VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘WTF’ Category

Vatican lists “new sins,” including pollution

Monday, March 10th, 2008


sins1.jpg

VATICAN CITY (Reuters - via Drudge) - Thou shall not pollute the Earth. Thou shall beware genetic manipulation. Modern times bring with them modern sins. So the Vatican has told the faithful that they should be aware of “new” sins such as causing environmental blight.The guidance came at the weekend when Archbishop Gianfranco Girotti, the Vatican’s number two man in the sometimes murky area of sins and penance, spoke of modern evils.

Asked what he believed were today’s “new sins,” he told the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano that the greatest danger zone for the modern soul was the largely uncharted world of bioethics.

“(Within bioethics) there are areas where we absolutely must denounce some violations of the fundamental rights of human nature through experiments and genetic manipulation whose outcome is difficult to predict and control,” he said.

The Vatican opposes stem cell research that involves destruction of embryos and has warned against the prospect of human cloning.

Girotti, in an interview headlined “New Forms of Social Sin,” also listed “ecological” offences as modern evils.

In recent months, Pope Benedict has made several strong appeals for the protection of the environment, saying issues such as climate change had become gravely important for the entire human race.

Under Benedict and his predecessor John Paul, the Vatican has become progressively “green”.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Liberal analysis : “How Dumb Can Republicans Get?”

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Here is a portion of a piece found on the liberal blog Firedoglake, that I found amusing.
It was a response to We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get? - By Charlotte Allen in the WaPo
Typical liberal stereotypical evil right wing trash fest.

In case you forgot this is the blog that produced this photo:


blackface3.jpg

I am certainly not the only Republican flummoxed by this openly homoerotic hero worship by my fellow Republicans. An acquaintance plans to write a screenplay called “The Golf Course,” in which four Republican men drive around in an electric cart and salaciously fondle their five irons while discussing how to most effectively screw minorities out of their right to vote.

babyche.jpgWhat is it about us Republicans? Why do we always fall for the hyperbole, the ill-conceived ideas, the bulging flightsuit crotches? Just look at what’s #1 on the hardcover nonfiction best seller list of the New York Times: “Liberal Fascism,” by Jonah Goldberg, a paean to half-cocked research, terrible sentence structure, and a shocking paucity of logic! Why must Goldberg perpetuate the stereotype that Republicans are incapable of producing the facts to support our arguments? There’s also Glenn Beck, at #7, reinforcing the notion that Republicans are too dumb to understand evolutionary theory, and Newt Gingrich, weighing in at #8, reminding us that he is the human canker sore on the upper lip of Republican family values.

Television serves us no better. The Sunday morning news programs give Republicans plenty of air time to put our stupidity on display. We can publicly humiliate ourselves by salivating over John McCain with George Stephanopoulos. Tim Russert’s our go-to man when we want to shred a certain female Democratic presidential candidate. Create an echo chamber from the latest White House blast fax? Give Cokie Roberts a call; she’s quite the gifted parrot.

As sad as it may be, several of the alleged myths about 21st-century Republicanism have been proven true. We really do fetishize war and want to drown Medicare and Social Security in a bathtub. The size of our automobiles is inversely proportionate to our “manly characteristic.”

Moreover, a study published by Regent University revealed that Republican men are statistically more prone to closeted gay sex than Democratic men. (The only good news was that closeted Republican men tended to be single, so the revelations of their sex lives didn’t destroy entire families with twelve or more children.) And then there was that study that showed that protest121.jpgliberals are more adaptable than conservatives. Surely, the theory that Republicans are the dumber party is amply supported by the candidates they put forward for President.

READ THE FULL ENTRY HERE

I know I’m a bit nuts for occasionally reading retarded liberal shit like this, I’m hardly insulted by it I’m more amused when I read stuff like this.
I am keenly aware that there are a great many leftists who truly think like this retarded bastard.

I’m a conservative dude, always have been always will be, I grew up in the Bay Area in the 1970 and was around some of the most retarded mentally handicapped liberal nuts on the planet. My conservatism is a direct result of growing up and seeing and listening to the craziness of liberal nuts first hand. Not by reading any specific books, listening to talk radio, or absorbing speeches by old right wing icons, or being indoctrinated by some conservative guru I heard on the radio or watched on TV. My disdain for liberalism stems from direct observation of these socially retarded minions.

When I read entries like this I wonder, do individuals who write this 10.jpgkind of bullshit do so with a straight face?

I understand that there is this never ending battle of ideas and we all are part of it. Despite the calls for civility, I love these battles and believe that these political battles are necessary. Yes they can be nasty and bloody but the idea that “civil” political discourse is somehow possible is grossly naïve.

Both sides routinely borrow from the most extreme examples of social and political ignorance and intellectual vacancy exhibited by folks on the right and the left everyday.

In this piece this individual points out how those of us on the right don’t use facts to support our arguments, but it tis they who routinely gives us shining examples of liberal brilliance and logic everyday. Below are some examples of a few things, shit if I were to lay out every example of liberal nonsense this post would go on forever.
From global warming alarmism, to eco terrorism, race baiting politics, anti-American, socialist propaganda nonsense and the list goes on and on. And somehow this individual says that we on the right are the stupid ones. Seriously are these people really that blind to their own intellectual dishonesty?


codepinkfatlady.jpg


azrepubliceffigy.jpg


oly1.jpg

Sphere: Related Content

Oops! McCain Makes the Slip Conservatives Feared All Along

Friday, February 29th, 2008

Mccain proud
by dollarsandsense123

********
Gives credence to this commercial

Sphere: Related Content

Race-mongering Rep. Diane Watson channels Ray Nagin

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008


Tipster JP passes along audio from a Black History Town Hall meeting last night held by Congressional Black Caucus leaders at Howard University in Washington, D.C.California Democrat Rep. Diane Watson, in discussing D.C. representation, channeled New Orleans Mayor Ray “Chocolate City” Nagin. Partial transcript:


Did you know your representatives can not vote? They can only vote in the committee as a whole. So what you’re going to have to do is declare the District [of Columbia] something like a state so they can have a proportional representation who vote. But that would give this district two senators and there are a lot of people on that floor who don’t want to see that occur because if there’s a chocolate city, this is it.

More at Michelle Malkin

In case you have not heard of Watson, here is a clip.

Sphere: Related Content

Hope dims that Earth will survive Sun’s death

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

I started to comment, but then I thought fuck it, no comment necessary.
But don’t let me stop you from trying to figure this one out.


twilightzone1.jpgThe future looks bright for the Earth – but not in the way we’d hoped. The slim chance our planet will survive when the Sun begins its death throes has been ruled out.In a few billion years, the Sun will fuse the last of its hydrogen into helium, turn into a red giant and expand to 250 times its current size. At first, the Sun’s loss of mass will loosen its gravitational pull on Earth, which will allow the planet to migrate to a wider orbit about 7.6 billion years from now.

This process has led some to speculate that the Earth might escape destruction – but survival now seems impossible, says Peter Schröder of the University of Guanajuato in Mexico and Robert Smith of the University of Sussex in the UK.

They created the most detailed model to date of the Sun’s transition to a red giant, based on observations of six nearby red giant stars. Sure enough, they found that Earth’s orbit will widen at first. But Earth will also induce a “tidal bulge” on the Sun’s surface, with its own gravitational pull. The bulge will lag just behind the Earth in its orbit, slowing it down enough to drag it to a fiery demise.

There is one last hope for anybody still living on Earth, the researchers say. In the past, some have suggested that Earth’s orbit could be tweaked by arranging the fly-by of a nearby asteroid to tug at it. This method could potentially maintain Earth’s speed enough to keep it in a widening orbit, they say.

Also check out: The last place on earth to survive when the sun explodes

Sphere: Related Content

‘I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama….psych just kidding! UPDATE

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

larrysinclairfailed.jpgFrom the Cleveland Leader via Conservative Grapevine

The Minnesota man who claims to have had sex with and taken cocaine with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama voluntarily participated in a series of polygraph tests over the weekend.

Whitehouse.com initially offered Larry Sinclair $10,000 to take a polygraph test, and $100,000 if he passed it and was shown to be telling the truth.Whitehouse.com acquired the services of two expert polygraph examiners, who have examined Mr. Sinclair. The results of the first polygraph examination by Dr. Ed Gelb (Former President of the American Polygraph Association) indicate “deception” in regards to both the drug and sex claims by Sinclair.

The second expert’s conclusions have not yet been revealed, but should be early this week. These will either confirm or deny the first examiner’s results. Whitehouse.com has additionally promised to post video recordings of the examinations for complete disclosure and transparency.

MORE HERE

********************************************************************
Sinclair, who describes himself as “gay,” claims he “personally engaged in
 sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999″ with Obama
larrysinclair.jpg
Minnesota man takes his case to court, YouTube, $100,000 polygraph challenge..This is from World Net Daily, no shit, not from the National Enquirer.Now I know this is small by comparison, and more tabloid in scope, but as the Obama magic seemingly propels him closer to the Oval Office there will be more crazy shit said about him and more weirdness will manifest itself.Between the crazy shit the Clinton’s will unveil, the ever present racial strife that still plagues this country closet racists will stop at nothing to torpedo this man becoming president.
Hell the media is already circulating crazy shit like assassination plots against the dude.No amount of youthful exuberance will be able to overcome the painful reality of racist strife in this country and Obama will be the main target

WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama’s staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance – thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.

“My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest,” Sinclair told WND by telephone. “I didn’t want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999.”

MORE HERE

Sphere: Related Content

Moonbattery watch

Thursday, February 21st, 2008


liberalzone.jpg

Two stories from Moonbattery…I don’t know whether or not to be worried, pissed off or just completely annoyed.


(link) Moonbattery makes all things possible — except for good things. Professional bloviator Rhonda B. Graham, who is black, has called for the reinstitution of slavery.

Of course, it wouldn’t be called slavery, but rather “enforced community service.” She praises a plan by failed presidential candidate Chris Dodd to impose it. Reagan’s call for volunteerism was no good, because it was voluntary. But so long as it’s coerced, “volunteerism” will exemplify “the new American patriotism at work.” Clodd wants to sentence all high school students to performed 100 hours of community service, as though they were criminals.

*****

San Franfreakshow Eco-Nazis Root through GarbageTo advance its fanciful goal of recycling 75% of all waste by 2010, San Francisco bureauweenies are now rooting through people’s garbage in search of items that should have gone in the recycling bin.

Those who have failed to sort their garbage in accordance with the latest regulations first get a note, then a letter, then a knock on the door by the Garbage Police. Fines will soon follow.

CBS 5 has a video report, featuring a guy who claims to have been framed by someone else using his trash can. Tell it to the judge!

Sphere: Related Content

Feminists for Clinton?!?

Monday, February 18th, 2008


We are women who support Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States. We do so because we believe that she will be the best president for the entire country. And as feminists, we also believe that Clinton is the best choice for attending to issues of special importance to women.

We write to you now because it’s time for feminists to say that Senator Obama has no monopoly on inspiration. We are among the millions of women and men who have been moved to action by her. Six months ago, some of us were committed to her candidacy, some of us weren’t, but by now we all find ourselves passionately supporting her. Brains, grace under pressure, ideas, and the skill to make them real: we call that inspiring. The restoration of good government after eight years of devastation, a decent foreign policy with ties to world leaders repaired, withdrawal from Iraq and universal health care: we call that exciting.

******
Earlier I was asked if I had to vote for one of the three stooges for president who would that be? I said Hillary. However after reading this nonsense from these websites HERE, HERE, and HERE and watching the sappy ass video above, I changed my mind, no true feminist could possible be inspired by Hillary. The only reason she is even in position to be president is because her husband screwed around on her and she was willing to be in the shadow of her man for political expediency.

Frankly, if Michelle Obama were running for president I’d vote for her WAY before I would Mrs. Bill Clinton.

Any woman who would try and sell you the merits of a Hillary Clinton presidency solely based on this ridiculous notion that she is somehow “inspiring” is quite frankly full of crap.

Oh don’t get me wrong, Obama is an equally empty vessel and my disdain for McCain is obvious. So who would I vote for, gun to my head, fuck it, go ahead and pull the damm trigger!

Sphere: Related Content

Pathetic liberal pieces of shit in Berkeley

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

Also from Moonbattery, I have been reading about this all week and the more I pay attention the more it just pisses me the fuck off. This is exactly the reason why having a spineless tard Republican like McCain, someone who has no problem reaching across the aisle and working with the very bastards who have no problem with the conduct of these people and the city of Berkeley just makes me sick.
If McKein wants my vote he certainly would speak out against this bullshit, but I won’t hold my breath.

*********

Senator Jim DeMint couldn’t find a single Democrat who would back his bill to withhold earmarks from this cesspool until it shows some respect for the soldiers defending the country that provides those earmarks.

Sphere: Related Content

Snoop ranting about this Winehouse chick, popular culture… so what else is new?

Tuesday, February 12th, 2008


America’s next top model? Singing sensation? Trailer court junkie?
amy1.jpg

If you are an Amy Winehouse fan, don’t read, but then again I doubt that anyone who peeps this blog could possible be a fan of this white crackhead drug fiendI watched some of the Grammy Awards; Mrs. Snoop was able to tolerate far more of it than I could. I tried to watch the performance of this Amy chick; I have read some amusing stories about her recently.As I’m typing this I started to say the obligatory “I can’t understand how people, bla, bla bla, totally amazed bla bla bla that a person, bla bla bla who is a self destructive, ugly crackhead skank can be so celebrated in the music world.

She is exceedingly untalented, skinny, just ugly, and perpetually fucked up.
Our society continues to amaze me at the type of skanks, skeezers, ratheads, checkenheads and bums we prop up and make stars out of.

This Winehouse skank was initially denied a U.S. visa to perform live at the Grammy’s due to the “use and abuse of narcotics”. This was subsequently reversed but not in time for her to perform at the Grammy’s in person. Instead she was “forced” to perform from London.

She, as is Paris Hilton, is rewarded for her less than stellar behavior, basically letting her know that her abuses are fine and that she can and will become even more famous by simply snorting some more power and adding a few more tattoos to her bony ass body.

I read that during a recent concert of hers, the bitch spat at fans while they exited during the show. She got pissed, wacking her own head with the microphone when she kept forgetting the lyrics to her own damm songs!.

Wait, you mean fans of hers paid money to see this skank, knowing that she likely never performs sober or not drug induced and they got mad when she acted “normally” in her mind? I love it!

amy3.jpgAs this society continues to degrade I recognize that many artists do bizarre and different things to make a name for themselves, but bizarre and different is a long way from drunk, stoned and obnoxious.
But forget about that, the bitch is not even remotely talented yet we celebrate her lifestyle and mediocre talent by giving her awards and finding a way for her to perform before a national audience. Amazing!

It’s the same thing with this Heath Ledger dude. He assumes room temperature from an “accidental” overdose of drugs yet the public feels sorry for him. “He had such promise as an actor” or “We are going to miss him in the movies”. No we won’t, he was a fucken drug fiend too, and his demise was inevitable.
Making a goddamm saint out of some prescription junkie white dude yet he is no different than a crackhead in the hood who “accidentally” overdoses and ends up with a tag on his toe as Leroy or Lekisha Doe in the morgue.

However I guess it explains these young morons screaming and crying at Obama rallies or Hillary’s supporters who swear that her presidency will bring “change” or a “new direction.”
I guess that if you believe that some skank like Winehouse is “talented” then you too would think that Obama or Hillary is “qualified” to be president.
It makes you cringe when you think about the voting age being 18.

Sphere: Related Content

This is just sad… at least to me, but I’m a crankly cynical bastard…

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008


obamaauwinter.jpg

I found this picture while reading a post on THIS blog.
Now I’m hardly a playa hater, although I am not destined to be a wealthy, famous or infamous individual, it is increasing disturbing to me that human beings today seemingly more and more each passing day give such reverence to “star” figures in society.I totally understand that this is not new; I’m just astonished at these fawning star crazed Obama crowds, drooling over a man that has yet to accomplish a damm thing.
I have always believed that the loftier the status you grant an individual that you indeed become a lesser individual on the inside.

I remember reading a slightly disturbing article, at least to me, some time ago, here is a sample:

Thomas Jefferson’s famous “defining of America” phrase, “All men are created equal,” is not entirely accurate. While all Jefferson intended to state was that all people should be treated fairly with human rights (which is true), the statement itself has connotations which cannot be accepted. There are certain people who deserve more respect and authority than others. Society needs to know that there are boundaries and limits. We need to give our seat on the bus to an older person out of respect. We need to stand up for sages, elders, and even parents as they enter the room.If “everyone is equal,” then we run the risk of making no one equal. We will produce youngsters who laugh at the elderly and disobey their teachers and principals because they will feel “equal” with authority figures.

 If “everyone is equal,” we will lose respect for others since we are as equal as they. We will only be concerned with our own selves which will inevitably make it impossible to attain holiness. Holiness means refraining from indulgences and one cannot do that if he is self-centered.

Through revering parents, we learn to have a sense of awe. Once a person integrates respect for his parents into his personality, this attitude will serve as a springboard for revering God.

The words of some egotistical Baptist preacher, the words of someone who demands respect from his followers, give reverence to me because through me there is God!

Maybe some of you may agree with this premise, but I never have. As much as I loved and respected my parents I certainly was not “in awe” of them.
I respect the power, love and guidance that I believe God provides me.
God created all of us to strive to be “great” to use the gifts God provides us to be the best that we can be. In my estimation that can’t happen if we hold other human beings to such a lofty mental, emotional and psychological status.

I am mindful that my faith in God provides me some measure of mental and spiritual nourishment and comfort.
If as we Christians believe, that we are all indeed children of God then I believe that no man is above me.
Yes, I would grant a seat to an elderly person or treat a person of authority with respect. However that respect however must be earned.

Respect is certainly due to those who have through various educational, economic and societal achievements, personal sacrifice, and personal hardship or sacrificed a part of themselves to improving society seeking no public adoration.
Politics is an ego driven endeavor. Anyone who goes into politics claiming to want to “change” society for the better always does so with an agenda and their legacy in mind.
There is nothing noble about creating “change” in a society on the backs of the people and the forced extortion of taxpayer revenues.

Now if you had shitty parents and they never taught you any morals or basic human respect then you then are screwed.

I have never been able to comprehend individuals’ rabid obsession to singers, rappers and rock stars, movie icons and sports figures. I cringe at both parents and children’s’ obsession over that Hannah Montana girl.
I certainly grant the respect earned by some for either the work they have done and contributions they have made to the greater society at large, but to hold someone up to such a lofty status as these individuals have for Obama when he has accomplished nothing calls into question the mental stability and the self esteem of our overall society.

As I look at this photo and see these people clamoring over Obama as if he is some freaking messiah, I honestly wonder, where the reverence and adulation comes from.

Obama will never make a payroll; he will never create a single job, he can’t single handedly rebuild New Orleans, cure the world of terrorists or Cancer, he will never be able to prevent a single rape or murder, he will never be able to heat anybody’s home, educated a child or accelerate our exploration into space.

There are two things I know about Obama; 1) He campaigned and raised money for a white racist segregationist who still refer to black folks as Niggers. 2) He in his recent revelation that he will support granting drivers licenses to illegal Mexicans, he will pander to any racial demographic to get votes.

I was watching again the TV series Rome, and back in the day, the people subjected themselves to the worship of countless idols and gods, in one moment praying for spiritual healing and good fortune, the next praying for the death and dismemberment of their enemies.
We obviously still worship false idols today. You would think that with the advancement of our society and the speed of information this society would be impervious to hollow showy rhetoric or politically preachy oratory.

Seemingly everyday this world creates another fraudulent leader, another faux religion to worship, a new scheme to instantly provide wealth or weight loss or a new instant but certainly temporary singing sensation.

Far too many of us are looking to others for greatness and psychological fulfillment, tis a very sad time in this exceedingly crazy world indeed.

Sphere: Related Content

Recession, Ron Paul fans, Drama Queen Conservatives, still not voting for McCain

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008


The only political candidate worthy of my vote!

simpsonalien.jpg
From Sweetness & Light 

War News Good? Let’s Create A Recession - A search for the term “recession” in the pages of the New York Times turns up 210 results just in the past 30 days

***********

Ron Paul Nutbars Crow About Nevada - From Brainsters Blog

You know you’re pathetic when you point to a state where you got 14% of the vote in a state caucus where you ran the only TV ads. An LA Times blogger enthuses:

Boy, oh, boy! Hidden behind all the hoopla, headlines and the Nevada caucus victories of Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton is one little-noticed but stunning political development and number:Ron Paul, the one-time Libertarian candidate and 10-term Republican congressman from Texas, was in second place. That’s right, Second Place. The 72-year-old ob-gyn who’s always on the end of the line at GOP debates or barred altogether, was running ahead of John McCain, Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, in fact, ahead of….all other Republicans except Romney, who easily captured his second state in a week after Michigan.

Woooooot! The Ron Paul Love Revolution is surging!

************

Also from Brainster - Drama Queen Conservative Bloggers

Add Jeff Goldstein to the list: I will not, will not, vote for John McCain.Oh, and he won’t vote for Mike Huckabee, either, and would have to hold his nose to vote for Mitt Romney. If Fred doesn’t win the nomination then Jeff’s going to sit this one out. LOL! Funniest thing Goldstein’s ever written.One of John Hawkins’ weekend guests does a little DQ herself:Jeff captures my ennui perfectly. And this reminds me of what I’ve written before: bloggers are a different breed than the average American. The air we breath on the conservative side is as rarefied as the air breathed in newsrooms around America.No, it’s as rarefied as the air breathed in the liberal blogosphere. And I mean that seriously. The idiot lib-bloggers spent all of 2006 trying to beat a Democrat because he was an apostate on one issue. The conservative bloggers look like they’re going to be spending all of 2008 trying to beat a Republican because he was an apostate on one issue.And don’t try to convince me it’s more than that one issue. McCain-Feingold? Tell me that you’re seriously going to sit out an election because of campaign finance laws. Torture (which Goldstein mentions)? Hey, I disagree with the senator on that issue, but guess what? He actually knows what torture is like, unlike Jeff or me.

You know, everybody on the conservative side of the aisle got a big laugh out of the gag that Hillary’s new theme song was, “It’s My Party, and I’ll Cry If I Want To”, and now what happens? Less than two weeks later, they’re singing it too!

*****************
Oh what the hell, so I’m a drama Queen Conservative Blogger, I’m still not voting for McCain. John McCain can kiss my black ass and any blogger who is supporting him who wants to write this trifling bullshit chastising me for my political decision making can also kiss my black ass.

I said before and I will keep saying, the Democrats can have the fucken White House; I don’t give a shit anymore.
McCain all of these years has been comfortable with kissing the collective asses of Democrats and he is frankly more comfortable with them than he is with his right leaning homies.

The more posts like this I read from McCain pimps just makes me laugh.
Fucken people on these radio talks shows getting on the air and sounding off about these sorry ass candidates, it’s not only irritating it is downright embarrassing.
The political contenders in this election cycles, candidates on both sides of the political aisle are all idiots. I must admit that I frankly feel like a complete jackass for falling for Freds faux candidacy. It was clear that he did not want the gig, I knew this from the beginning but I was searching for something, anything to latch on to. I was a fool, particularly since I posted my support here.
That won’t happen again.

Nobody can convince me that any of these people are worthy of my vote, they all suck; America has successfully fucked the presidential selection process. I seriously doubt that we will ever have a candidate who is truly worthy of the position.
Anyone worthy of the position is too smart to run.
We will be forever left with sinister, lying ass, soulless, pandering slugs who are not even deserving of being mayor of Mayberry much less the most powerful position on the planet.
All these candidates need to do is bullshit (lie to) enough dolts, speak somewhat eloquently blurt out a few crap phrases and magically you have a candidate.

John McCain supporters keep bringing up his time in the Hanoi Hilton, like being a POW automatically shoots you to the front of the presidential line.
POW or not, if your political ideology is full of holes, then you won’t get my vote.
If that draws the ire of you McCain supporters then screw you.

Sphere: Related Content

Golfweek noose elicits strong reaction

Friday, January 18th, 2008



golfweek.jpg

This image released by Golfweek magazine shows the cover of the Jan. 19, 2008 issue. Dave Seanor, vice president and editor of the weekly magazine, said he was overwhelmed by negative reaction to the photo of a noose on the cover of this week’s issue, illustrating a story about the suspension of Golf Channel anchor, Kelly Tilghman , for using the word ‘lynch’ in an on-air discussion about how to beat Tiger Woods

Read article: Golfweek noose elicits strong reaction

Look out, soon will come ANOTHER hollow apology from some cracka.
I’m going to keep asking this until I stop reading these idiot ass stories.
You white folks out there STILL think that race is no longer an issue?

Why would the “former” editor of this magazine even consider putting a noose on the cover of a magazine, particularly since noose stories dominated the headlines just a few months ago? You simply must be a colossal retard not to process the ramifications of this. And the idiot bitch who used the “lynching” example as one way to beat Tiger Woods is equally a clueless dolt. This shit will not go away, it’s not like I’m searching for these fucken stories and yet as I search for reactions, more websites and blogs are filled with white folks annoyed at the fact that these stories keep coming to the forefront and that people (black folks) are overly sensitive about racism.
Now we will soon hear from Sharpton, and crackas will be pissed at him for ambulance chasing again, when its dumb ass white people who keep doing and saying stupid shit.

Sphere: Related Content

The Cruise Indoctrination Video Scientology Tried To Suppress

Thursday, January 17th, 2008


Crazy Bastard!!
 cruise.jpg

This is from the website Gawker

You have to watch this video. It shows Tom Cruise, with all the wide-eyed fervor that he brings to the promotion of a movie, making the argument for Scientology, the bizarre 20th-century religion. Making the argument is an understatement. The Hollywood actor, star of movies such as Mission Impossible, is a complete fanatic. “When you’re a Scientologist, and you drive by an accident, you know you have to do something about it, because you know you’re the only one who can really help… We are the way to happiness. We can bring peace and unite cultures.” There’s much much more. Let me put it this way: if Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah’s couch was an 8 on the scale of scary, this is a 10.

Click here to view video, the clip was pulled from You Tube

Sphere: Related Content

Huckabee Misleading Mailing on Immigration

Wednesday, January 16th, 2008

Found Story and You Tube Clip on Flopping Aces

Huckabee Misleading Mailing on Immigration
huckmin.jpg




***

While Minuteman Founder Gilchrist has endorsed Huckabee, the Minutemen who are actually building the border fence and manning border outposts has NOT! Confused?

Via Marc Ambinder, here’s the press release from the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps:

Real Minutemen Do Not Endorse Huckabee.

No National Minuteman Group has endorsed Mike Huckabee.
One individual Minuteman has personally endorsed him.

For the sake of clarity, it is important to note that the Minuteman
Civil Defense Corps (MCDC), the nation’s largest Minuteman organization,
is a 501(C)4 non-profit organization and cannot and does not endorse any
candidate for public office. MCDC is not associated with Mr. Jim
Gilchrist, who today endorsed Mike Huckabee for president.

Jim Gilchrist’s erstwhile Minuteman Project is itself an organization
which by its own representations as a non-profit civic group cannot
legally endorse candidates. It does not have any volunteers who observe
illegal border activity. It has no border fence building projects. Jim
Gilchrist here speaks only for Jim Gilchrist, he does not speak for the
Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, nor is he nationally representative of
most patriots in the “Minuteman movement” – who under no circumstances
could ignore the failed record nor endorse the duplicitous “plan”
recently rolled out by candidate Mike Huckabee. The national media needs
to recognize that Jim Gilchrist’s endorsement is his own personal
statement, nothing more.

This story also on Mike’s America Blog

In case you people forgot: Legality of Huckabee’s Mexican consulate deal questioned: Critics say Arkansas citizens, businesses financed office to draw illegal workers - Story Link

Financial inducements arranged by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to establish a Mexican consular office in Little Rock may have violated state law, according to an Arkansas attorney.
As WND reported yesterday, critics in Arkansas charge Huckabee, who lately has enjoyed a surge in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, worked with some of the state’s most prominent and politically powerful businesses to establish the consulate as a magnet for drawing illegal immigrants to the state to accept low-paying jobs.Huckabee, in an interview with WND, strongly denied the allegations.

Arkansas attorney Chip Sexton provided WND a written legal brief arguing the state government’s sublease to Mexico of office space for the consulate was illegal under Arkansas law. Sexton contended the deal raised questions about the appropriateness of private citizens and corporations in Arkansas providing financial incentives for the government of Mexico to locate a consulate office in Little Rock.

I know, I know, you people don’t care about this shit. Huckabee is a “conservative” man of God…

Sphere: Related Content

Hillary Minion Brings Up Obama’s Drug Use

Monday, January 14th, 2008

From the NY Times via Sweetness & Light


COLUMBIA, S.C. — Robert L. Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television, who is campaigning today in South Carolina with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, just made a suggestion that raised the specter of Barack Obama’s past drug use. He also compared Mr. Obama to Sidney Poitier, the black actor, in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.”At a rally here for Mrs. Clinton at Columbia College, Mr. Johnson was defending recent comments that Mrs. Clinton made regarding Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. She did not mean to take any credit away from him, Mr. Johnson said, when she said that it took President Johnson to sign the civil rights legislation he fought for.Dr. King had led a “moral crusade,” Mr. Johnson said, but such crusades have to be “written into law.”

“That is the way the legislative process works in this nation and that takes political leadership,” he said. “That’s all Hillary was saying.”

He then added: “And to me, as an African-American, I am frankly insulted that the Obama campaign would imply that we are so stupid that we would think Hillary and Bill Clinton, who have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues since Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood –­ and I won’t say what he was doing, but he said it in the book –­ when they have been involved.”

Moments later, he added: “That kind of campaign behavior does not resonate with me, for a guy who says, ‘I want to be a reasonable, likable, Sidney Poitier ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.’ And I’m thinking, I’m thinking to myself, this ain’t a movie, Sidney. This is real life.”

Gee, yet another Clinton hireling attacking Mr. Obama for his drug use and/or dealing.

(And just after attending church services, too.)

Still, why doesn’t Obama just explain how he “didn’t inhale” and put it all behind him?

Over at Michelle Malkin She brings up the Sidney Poitier remark:



This is how they view Obama–as the unbearably, too perfect, too presumptuous, accomplished black doctor character in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.”If Obama is Poitier, then Johnson and Hillary’s black demagogues are the real-life analogies of Spencer Tracey and Katharine Hepburn’s racist black maid, Tillie, who derides Poitier and treats him as a traitor to his race.

A bit of movie trivia:

The film also attempted to touch upon black-on-black racism, as when both the doctor’s father and the household cook Matilda ‘Tillie’ Binks, played by Isabel Sanford in a small but memorable role, take the young man to task for his perceived presumption……The original version of this film that played in theaters in 1967 contained the sarcastic one-liner “The Reverend Martin Luther King!”, issued by the sassy black maid Tillie in response to the question, “Guess who’s coming to dinner?”, which is the key line of dialogue from which the film got its title. However, after the assassination of Martin Luther King on April 4, 1968, this line was removed from the film, so by August 1968, almost all theater showings of this film had this line omitted. As early as 1969, the line was restored to many but not most prints, and the line was preserved in the VHS and DVD versions of the film as well.

Folks let me tell you, although I’m not a Democrat and have no intention on voting for either of these people Hillary fucked up. Black folks even ones who may not have voted for Obama will turn on her racist ass in a heartbeat. Black folks are not going to allow a white politician, even the Clintons, to drag another black man on the back of the figurative pick-up truck.
The Democrat Party is in serious trouble on this issue, all of these years the Democrats have bitched and moaned and distorted the fact that it was the Republicans who were the primary arbiters of racist and bigoted politics.
Hillary wants to be president badly, and like Dick Morris said she is not beyond destroying Obama on race issues to capture the White House.
Obama watch your back!!!

Sphere: Related Content

CNN Analyst: Republicans Are Conservative, Democrats Are Moderate

Friday, January 4th, 2008

This from Moonbattery
mtheuriau0251s1.JPG

A tip for the Clinton News Network: Whatever you’re paying Bill Schneider to be a political analyst, it’s too much. Here’s what Schneider discerned from the Hawkeye Cauci:

Republicans are very conservative. […] But Democrats are pretty moderate voters.

Schneider bases his claim on voter self-descriptions. It seems even some liberals realize they will be dismissed as cranks if they describe themselves as “very liberal.” So they call themselves moderate, for the same reason Schneider calls himself a “political analyst” instead of the more accurate “moonbat propagandist.”

Sphere: Related Content

US state of New Jersey mulls slavery apology

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008


newark.jpg

From The Raw Story

The US state of New Jersey is to weigh apologizing for its role in the slave trade, under a bill to be considered by lawmakers Thursday, more than 200 years after the state abolished the practice.If approved, the bill would make New Jersey the fifth US state to issue such an apology but the first among the northern anti-slavery states that formed the Union side in the US civil war from 1861-1865.

The text of the bill “expresses New Jersey’s profound regret for its role in slavery and apologizes for wrongs inflicted by slavery and its after effects in the United States.”

The “slave states” of Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia apologized last year for their slave-trading past. Maryland, however, fought on the northern side in the war.

New Jersey became the last northern state to abolish slavery in 1804, but the gradual law meant that the practice was not completely eradicated there until 1846, while slavery was not officially abolished nationwide until 1865.

Former (Black) president Bill Clinton expressed his “regrets” over the US role in the slave trade and President George W. Bush described it as “one of the greatest crimes of history,” but there has never been an official US government apology.

I’m sorry but I can’t pass up a chance to post ridiculous nonsense like politicians and gubments issuing these jackass apologies for slavery.
I found this particular proposed apology from New Jersey particularly amusing.
One of the most crime ridden, drug infested ghetto cesspools of Negrodom areas in the country will take the time to apologize for slavery while operating one of the most corrupt state gubments in the country.
Clean the fucken streets, educate and find black folks jobs. I’m so sick of these bullshit pandering apologies. I’m sure some crazy old Negro activist is pushing this, only old tired former civil rights retreads find these asinine slavery apologies heart warming.
Our own idiot fuck Senator Sam Brownback promised such a resolution if he were president.
Yes liberal black folks like to be pandered too, throw dem a few bones and some figurative political table scraps and any liberal politician can guarantee winning some votes.
But I still say if you people want to send me a gubment check for my “non” participation in slavery, shit I’ll take it. The Negro part of my background will appreciate it.

Sphere: Related Content

Clinton’s “don’t ask” policy

Friday, December 28th, 2007

hillary.jpg(link) As she races through Iowa in the days before next week’s caucuses, Hillary Clinton is taking few chances. She tells crowds that it’s their turn to “pick a president,’’ but over the last two days she has not invited them to ask her any questions.Before the brief Christmas break, the New York senator had been setting aside time after campaign speeches to hear from the audience. Now when she’s done speaking, her theme songs blare from loudspeakers, preventing any kind of public Q&A.

She was no more inviting when a television reporter approached her after a rally on Thursday and asked if she was “moved’’ by Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Clinton turned away without answering.

Her daughter, Chelsea, had the same reaction when a reporter approached her with a question.

Hillary Clinton’s no-question policy didn’t sit well with some of the Iowans who came to see her speak.

“I was a little bit underwhelmed,’’ said Doug Rohde, 46, as he left her a rally in a fire station in Denison. “The message was very generic — and no questions.’’

I’m actually going to side with Mrs. Bill on this one; I’m thinking what the fuck, how many times can you deal with taking the same stupid fucken questions over and over from a bunch of clueless rednecks.
I heard on the news last night that 1/3 of the folks in Iowa STILL say they are undecided!

Um people if you are still undecided about what person you are supporting for president then frankly you are either mildly retarded, or you really don’t give a shit.
In the age of You Tube and 24 hour news cycles, and millions of blogs what the fuck else do you have to know about a particular candidate.
How many times do you have to hear a Democrat say, “health care for everybody, bla, bla, bla” “out of Iraq” “welfare benefits for all, bla bla bla.” Get a clue!!!!

The fact that every damm time I see an audience of people in Iowa behind a candidate it’s a fucken blue hair, bingo crowd, lollapalooza fest.
Shit they can’t remember what Obama said the day before at the pancake breakfast or two days before at the Butter Cow Convention or two weeks before at the Miss Future Farmers of America Pageant, damm!!!

Sphere: Related Content

Rush responds to Huck peace offering

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

From The Politico

mike.jpgRush Limbaugh — responding to Mike Huckabee’s peace offering — said today that he doesn’t need to talk with the former Arkansas governor.

(I would tell Suckabee to kiss my ass!!!!)

“I saw his comments and accept them as honest, sincere and genuine,” Limbaugh wrote in an e-mail.    

Still, the conservative talk show host indicated his continued displeasure at the anonymous remarks  Thursday from a Huckabee backer suggesting he takes his cues from the ”D.C./Manhattan chattering class” that sparked this conflagration.

“What was somewhat stunning about all this is that NO ONE in the GOP field, including advisers and staff, could possibly misread my 19-plus-year career the way Gov. Huckabee’s D.C. supporter did,” Limbaugh said.  “Whoever said those things was essentially repeating the Democrat mantra of all these years: that I am just an entertainer, not an independent thinker, part of the Wall Street/D.C. axis. If it was someone on Gov. Huckabee’s staff or support team, it was just silly, uninformed and thus curious.”

Limbaugh, the most listened-to talk show host in America and an influential voice in the conservative constellation, devoted part of his show Friday to defending himself against the charges.

“I’m part of the Cape Girardeau-Middle America axis,” Limbaugh said on the program, alluding to his Missouri hometown.

He also struck back, calling the attacks “Clintonian” and accused Huckabee’s campaign of “trying to dumb down conservatism in order to get it to conform with his record.” 

In his e-mail, Limbaugh kept it up.  

“Gov. Huckabee’s campaign is engaged in identity politics at this moment, so I understand his adviser’s/supporter’s intent to put the focus on me rather than the substance of my commentary,” he tweaked.

And as for Huckabee’s plea for Limbaugh to get in touch, the man behind the golden EIB microphone said this: [T]here are people on his Arkansas staff who know full well how to reach me and they have not.  But that is not necessary to me. We’re not playing in a kindergarten sandbox here. We are all presumably adults.”

Limbaugh did, though, offer a timely coda: ”I wish Gov. Huckabee a Merry Christmas.”

Sphere: Related Content

Redefining Conservatism

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

rep.JPGDES MOINES, Iowa–Stepping out for a press conference here Monday, Mike Huckabee fielded the ultimate question. Just how conservative are you?”I’m as conservative as anyone could hope to be, or want to be, or needs to be,” replied the smiling former Arkansas governor, never missing a beat, and following up with a boilerplate summary of his belief in “lower taxes,” the “sanctity of human life” and a “strong military”–before moving ever so swiftly on to the next question.

It was trademark Huckabee: Sounds great, explains little. It’s a strategy that has so far served him well, rocketing his campaign in recent weeks to the top ranks of the Republican presidential field. The question is whether he can continue to pull off that trick, now that he’s receiving belated media scrutiny. A few days following the candidate on the Iowa campaign trail suggests it could prove tough. If Mr. Huckabee does turn out to be everything Republicans “want” or “need” in a conservative, it will only be because the definition of a conservative has morphed to include tax hiking, protectionism, corporate scolding and an unserious approach to foreign policy.

What aren’t in doubt are Mr. Huckabee’s social-values credentials. He has an undisputed record on questions of abortion and gay marriage, and he’s spent no small portion of his limited advertising money making sure Iowa voters know it. Christian conservatives make up an estimated 40% of the state’s GOP vote, and by all accounts he’s slowly locking up that vote. That alone accounts for a fair share of his recent rise in the polls.

Mr. Huckabee is the charisma candidate. Like another man from Hope, Ark., the onetime pastor is an extraordinary speaker. He’s self-deprecating and funny, has perfect timing, and never struggles for an answer. He has that rare ability to pull out just the right story in response to any situation, and to deliver it in a folksy, Southern way.

Read the rest of this article here, but let me first just say this; Folks I’m angry, as angry as someone can be on Lexapro, and drinking Irish Cream on the rocks at 9:00a.m.
As this piece points out we are allowing people to redefine conservatism, this article focuses on Huck but the same can be said for 3 faux Republicans and what is worse far too many of you are allowing it.

As of today, December 18, 2007 I still have the utmost confidence that Fred Thompson will be the Republican Party’s nominee for President of the United States.
One reason why I believe that is because the major networks are completely ignoring him. Snoop WTF? I’ll explain.
Virtually every pundit on Fox goes out of their way to dismiss him and call him irrelevant. Republican pundits on interviews won’t even mention him.
I have even heard a couple of Democratic strategist say if he does not win South Carolina he will be out of the race.
Ask yourself this, if Fred Thompson’s campaign is in its final days, they why go out of your way to mention that?
Basically the media and the pundits are working awfully hard to discredit “an irrelevant” candidate.

Lets get real here; the Democrats do not want to run against Thompson, because he is not a closet liberal, because he has never advocated for big government, opening our boarders to illegal immigrants, reducing our military, backing away from the war against Islamic terrorist pimps, granting clemency to murderers and the list goes on.
He is not flashy, not a smooth talker, he looks like a worn out grandpa on most days, has this annoying clearing of the throat thingy he does, and dude needs to STILL get some good designer to have his suites tailored to fit him better.
But most of all I respect and admire an individual who is one of the Thompson’s campaigns most important individuals. I have said this before and I will say again, he has said to me that Thompson is a good man and a sincere man and could make a great president. He believes in him. From this individual, that is enough for me.

Every Republican pundit pulling for one of the three frauds dismisses him, because they want to avoid the conservative comparisons.
My anger comes from the people who claim to be Republican and some TV and blog pundits who proclaim themselves to be on the “conservative” bandwagon touting the faux conservative credentials of candidates like Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Giuliani? What the fuck are you people drinking in the morning?

We need to stop trying to redefine conservatism, maybe some of you need to go back and understand what that actually means.
If you people who have given your support to these frauds don’t wake up this party will be on the outside looking in the next 8 plus years, because you allowed fictitious poll numbers, Sunday morning Baptist preaching rhetoric, New York shyster slick talking points, and a lying ass LDS fraud to redefine conservatism.

Unlike a great number of bloggers and pundits who pimp for these campaigns, I’m not in Thompson’s pocket, I’m not paid to put a bunch of banner bullshit on my site, I don’t work for his campaign, not a family member, a friend from back in the day, has never been invited to interview or spend time with a candidate, I don’t have exclusive access to a campaign, never been invited to a campaign rally or party, not a pimp for the Republican Party.
Not paid to post my opinions on my blog or any other blog, do not receive one dime of money from blogging.
I do it because I love blogging, I have fun doing it, and I love to share my opinions. What you read and see is what I am.

If Fred does not get the nomination, the world will not end, I will be greatly disappointed, and I will be forced to support one of these frauds.
The only thing I can hope for is a Republican majority in one or both of the chambers.
Hopefully some Republican discipline will be administered.
Bottom line I’m just a brotha t