They said it: “man this dude is Krazy!” “you sir are an idiot” “you are a lunatic” “are you really black?” “meanest, most divisive, most irrelevant blog I have ever read”
And you thought you had to tune in to MSNBC, or Ann Coulter, Phyllis Schlafly or Bill Maher to discover all the many ways that women are just plain stupid. No more. Now you can get your misogyny on the Op-ed page of the Washington Post:We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get? – by Charlotte Allen
When the anti-feminists raise their voices this loudly, it generally means they fear a feminist uprising is brewing. And, yes, if a similar piece about a racial minority group graced the pages of this esteemed newspaper, the Washington Post would be out of business.
Most females lie “more cleverly and successfully than men” about everything from infidelity and facelifts to barhopping and shopping binges, according to a new book.
Barash interviewed 500 women nationwide who answered her Craigslist ads seeking females to confide what they fib about. Among her findings:
* 75 percent lie about how much money they spend. For instance, they sneak purchases inside their homes after shopping or hide the price tags.
* 50 percent harbor “mixed feelings about mothering.” One told Barash, “I look at these children and I crave sleep and free time. They wear me out and make me jealous of working women who have no children, no husbands.”
* More than 60 percent cheated on their husbands. A 32-year-old mother conducted her trysts while telling her trusting husband she was working late. Even in asking for a divorce, she withheld the truth: “I didn’t say I had fallen for another man. He was better off with my lies.”
On Rush’s website he had the transcript from some talk shows with Cokie Roberts from ABC and Dee Dee Myers expressing their displeasure over the sexism that is killing Hillary’s campaign.
ROBERTS: The only group she still really has is white women, and I do think that there’s some possibility that you will see a sort of reaction among white women. I had the opportunity –STEPHY: Like New Hampshire.
ROBERTS: — to interview Billie Jean King this week. And she said, “You know, I feel like everything I’ve worked for all my life is going out the window,” and there is that sense. I mean, here is this woman who worked hard. She’s done it all the way you’re supposed to do it, and then this cute young man comes in and says a bunch of sweet, you know, nothings, and — and pushes you out of the way. And a lot of women are looking at that and saying, “There goes my life.”
ROBERTS: The truth is, is that for a Republican running against him he can put him, you know, just squarely on the left of the Democratic Party. You know, he’s got a very — very much, you know, ADA, Americans for Democratic Action-approved voting record. He, unlike Hillary Clinton, oddly enough, given the rhetoric, has not reached across the aisle and worked with people in the other party to get things done, which she has done.
***********
MYERS: Hillary Clinton’s options are limited in many ways because she’s a woman. It’s difficult for her to get angry; it’s difficult for her to be sarcastic; when she gets tough, she sounds like a scold; and I think we have a different standard for how women, umm, can approach going negative, getting tough, and making their point than we do for men.
MYERS: The public has different expectations for women, and I think the press has covered her different as a woman. I think one of the things we’ve learned in this campaign is that the playing field still isn’t level. I don’t think you can separate the fact that she’s a woman. I think it’s still easier to be critical of a woman. I think you can say almost anything about a woman, even if it’s based in gender stereotypes without much penalty, and I think we’ve seen that throughout this race.
Oh Boo fucken hoo!
I’ve said this before and will keep saying, I DON’T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A WOMAN PRESIDENT, IN FACT I BELIEVE A WOMAN IN MANY WAYS WILL DO A BETTER JOB.
My problem is the same problem millions of Americans have, Dee Dee, Cokie, we HATE Hillary!! She sucks; she is a socialist big gubment nut! The only reason she was a “major” candidate was because her husband was president and he screwed around on her and more than that she believed that she was entitled to the job and America is rejecting her.
I don’t give a fuck what race or gender a candidate is, for me political ideology will always trump a candidate’s race or gender.
If I had my own business, or ran a corporation, anything having to do with employee, departmental, cabinet hiring/selection, all things being equal, nine time out of ten, I’ll select a woman over a man.
Women are more loyal; I would tend to trust women more, and in many cases will work harder.
Message for Hillary; we don’t like you. Deal wit it!
“How exciting it must be for the Democrats these days; two minority candidates running for President of the United States of America. What must be especially pleasing to women and blacks in this country is the fact that neither of these presumed “Poster Children For Minorities Rising Above Their Stigma” candidates actually CARES to really fight for the causes of these minority demographics from whence they have arisen, satisfied in their presumption that their “peeps” will vote for them, “just because.”
We are women who support Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States. We do so because we believe that she will be the best president for the entire country. And as feminists, we also believe that Clinton is the best choice for attending to issues of special importance to women.
We write to you now because it’s time for feminists to say that Senator Obama has no monopoly on inspiration. We are among the millions of women and men who have been moved to action by her. Six months ago, some of us were committed to her candidacy, some of us weren’t, but by now we all find ourselves passionately supporting her. Brains, grace under pressure, ideas, and the skill to make them real: we call that inspiring. The restoration of good government after eight years of devastation, a decent foreign policy with ties to world leaders repaired, withdrawal from Iraq and universal health care: we call that exciting.
******
Earlier I was asked if I had to vote for one of the three stooges for president who would that be? I said Hillary. However after reading this nonsense from these websites HERE, HERE, and HERE and watching the sappy ass video above, I changed my mind, no true feminist could possible be inspired by Hillary. The only reason she is even in position to be president is because her husband screwed around on her and she was willing to be in the shadow of her man for political expediency.
Frankly, if Michelle Obama were running for president I’d vote for her WAY before I would Mrs. Bill Clinton.
Any woman who would try and sell you the merits of a Hillary Clinton presidency solely based on this ridiculous notion that she is somehow “inspiring” is quite frankly full of crap.
Oh don’t get me wrong, Obama is an equally empty vessel and my disdain for McCain is obvious. So who would I vote for, gun to my head, fuck it, go ahead and pull the damm trigger!
A swarm of biographers in miners’ gear has tried to plumb the inky depths of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s warren-riddled psyche. My metaphor is drawn (as Oscar Wilde’s prim Miss Prism would say) from the Scranton coalfields, to which came the Welsh family that produced Hillary’s harsh, domineering father.Hillary’s feckless, loutish brothers (who are kept at arm’s length by her operation) took the brunt of Hugh Rodham’s abuse in their genteel but claustrophobic home. Hillary is the barracuda who fought for dominance at their expense. Flashes of that ruthless old family drama have come out repeatedly in this campaign, as when Hillary could barely conceal her sneers at her fellow debaters onstage — the wimpy, cringing brothers at the dinner table.
Hillary’s willingness to tolerate Bill’s compulsive philandering is a function of her general contempt for men. She distrusts them and feels morally superior to them. Following the pattern of her long-suffering mother, she thinks it is her mission to endure every insult and personal degradation for a higher cause — which, unlike her self-sacrificing mother, she identifies with her near-messianic personal ambition.
It’s no coincidence that Hillary’s staff has always consisted mostly of adoring women, with nerdy or geeky guys forming an adjunct brain trust. Hillary’s rumored hostility to uniformed military men and some Secret Service agents early in the first Clinton presidency probably belongs to this pattern. And let’s not forget Hillary, the governor’s wife, pulling out a book and rudely reading in the bleachers during University of Arkansas football games back in Little Rock.
Hillary’s disdain for masculinity fits right into the classic feminazi package, which is why Hillary acts on Gloria Steinem like catnip. Steinem’s fawning, gaseous New York Times op-ed about her pal Hillary this week speaks volumes about the snobby clubbiness and reactionary sentimentality of the fossilized feminist establishment, which has blessedly fallen off the cultural map in the 21st century. History will judge Steinem and company very severely for their ethically obtuse indifference to the stream of working-class women and female subordinates whom Bill Clinton sexually harassed and abused, enabled by look-the-other-way and trash-the-victims Hillary.
I’m sorry but I could not resist the temptation of posting the exploits of yet another man who has simultaneous destroyed his political career and likely his family because his dick obviously ran his life. Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison resigns.
Let me say, being a man in all, that I certainly have come close to sacrificing what was good for me for what could be described as a little more than some cheap male ego massaging.
However, I have never been able to figure out why some seemingly well rounded dudes, dudes who have so much going for them either personally or professionally will destroy their lives all because of a marginal piece of ass. Not even a great piece of ass.
Let’s see; AG’s office, good gig, lots of respect, Democrat hero, good reputation, bright political future… er uh hmmmm…. marginal piece of ass…. good gig…. marginal piece of ass. wow.
It’s not like dudes are sacrificing business or political careers over chicks who look like Halle Berry or Jessica Biel, hell even a walking white trash tard like Brittany Spears.
Mrs. Snoop said the lady in question was described as a curvaceous blonde, flirty, who liked to wear tight clothes and liked the big Texas hairdos. Yup those women in those tight clothes they will fuck a brotha up every time.
So now Kansas Democrats are in mourning, they are devastated because Morrison jumped over to the Democrat side and won over the abortion Jihadist Phil Kline as did our Lieutenant Governor.
Basically here in Kansas we have three parties Democrats, Moderate Republicans, and the Extreme Right. This is why although I could unify the party, could restore order, would make a great candidate for damm near anything I stay clear of the Republicans here, they are just fucked up, hopelessly unorganized and unfocused and most would remind you of Sam Brownback, likely one of the top five politicians in America that I am totally embarrassed that they are in the Republican Party. Kansas has an entire state of these crazy zealot rednecks.
I remember going to the first Yearly Kos convention when the party switching was going down and the libs there were so curious about Kansas Politics and gleeful at the apparent demise of the Republican Party in Kansas.
But back to the sex thingy, this is a question for the dudes, is there actually pussy out there that is so great that you would sacrifice everything for a few minutes (well in Morrison’s case multiple few minute sessions) for a piece of ass?
I have see a lot of very pretty women in my lifetime, some with bangin bodies, tight asses, impressive sweater cows (or as one friend calls them “fun bags”) and the business suit clad chicks that stroll through airports (I love women in business
suits.)
But I swear, I have yet to see a woman that I thought was so incredible that I was willing to sacrifice everything to engage in some headboard destruction.
Now the libs are mortified. Check out this entry from a lib blogger: Link
I’m sick at heart, but I don’t see anything else Morrison could do.As one of the most visible Democrats in the state, Morrison was helping to lead the charge against the religious right. He was also helping to push the state out of more than a century of Republican domination and into the blue column.
Having Morrison associated with the Democratic Party would have given Republicans and social conservatives an issue to rally behind. It would have sucked the air out of the Democratic resurgence.
Right now, I just want to cry. I voted for Morrison. I defended him on this blog. I saw him as a leader who could turn Kansas away from the blindly incompetent, abortion-obsessed regime of Phill Kline. I saw him as someone who could make the office of attorney general work for all Kansans — not just those who shared one narrow religious viewpoint.
Ok now don’t you think I’m trying to be highbrow about this, I have had countless “god damm” moments after seeing a smoking female. But I have this weird tick; as turned on as I may be at that moment I’m thinking I bet that bitch is crazy. Especially here in Larryville when I see a nice looking female and some dude is draped all over her and won’t let go. I’m thinking “needy” and I bet she makes dude fix her breakfast in bed.
Anywho, another man bites the dust at the hand of another skank. (She was married and cheating on her husband) so skank is appropriate.
So if you dudes out there are going out this weekend, be careful, if you are in a relationship, don’t let a pair of impressive sweater cows cause you to lose focus and potentially cost you a good solid relationship, a bunch of dead presidents and good ole hard earned respect. Something that is so elusive for so many men these days.
“The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight … and one of the things they’re certainly going to jump on is his drug use,” said Shaheen, the husband of former N.H. governor Jeanne Shaheen, who is planning to run for the Senate next year. Billy Shaheen contrasted Obama’s openness about his past drug use — which Obama mentioned again at a recent campaign appearance in New Hampshire — with the approach taken by George W. Bush in 1999 and 2000, when he ruled out questions about his behavior when he was “young and irresponsible.”Shaheen said Obama’s candor on the subject would “open the door” to further questions. “It’ll be, ‘When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?’” Shaheen said. “There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It’s hard to overcome.”
Shaheen’s remarks were some of the most direct to date by Clinton campaign officials in addressing the issue of Obama’s past drug use as a potential problem in the general election. This week, the Clinton campaign has been focusing on the broader issue of Obama’s electability, arguing that Democrats would be better off nominating a tested candidate like Clinton.
This is such a bunch of bullshit, here you have this Hillary dickhead flunky calling out Obama on drug use when you know damm well anyone associated with the Clinton campaign past or present, or homies of the Clinton Klan I bet frequently fired up the weed.
You mean to tell me firing up the mean green is not a regular hobby in Democrat circles.
Oh don’t get wrong, high brow Republicans will give you that hypocritical smirk while they spout off about the ill legality of partaking in the ceremonial burning of some Mary Jane. The same people who drown their sorrows in daily Martini or Merlot binges.
Yes I’m sure the Republican drug czars may just try and attack Obama on the issue, certainly a cheap shot, but would not be shocking.
This crap coming from the Hillary camp tho just reeks of incredible desperation. This like everything else in her campaign will bite her in the ass.
Every damm day someone in her campaign come out with some bullshit. She needs to just tell her supporters and staff to “shut the fuck up.”
“they pray on unsuspecting women” Women as victims again…
Tuesday, December 11th, 2007
“they pray on unsuspecting women” Women as victims again…
Ok this is a Today segment from Monday. The segment entitled “The Serial Dater”
is another in a long series of show segments, talk shows, numerous articles portraying men as “playas” “dogs” because they toy with the emotions of vulnerable, unsuspecting, fragile, frail, women.
I just think it tis hilarious, when will we get to the day where women are not always the damm victims of relationships.
Instead of plying the victim role, get smarter when it comes to entering a relationship with a dude.
This dude could not be a successful playa, particularly someone interesting enough to be a segment on the Today Show unless there were not a string of bimbos who 1) bought his bullshit and 2) willingly screwed his brains out.
“oh he will change for me because I can give him what no other woman can”
Pure comic genius! LOL!
Instead of ranting again saying the same ole shit, here is an old post, originally posted in May 07. This post along with a couple of other somewhat related post on women issues has generate the most comments, e-mails of any topic I have ever posted on this blog.
First was a response to me from a commenter about something I had said earlier and them my response to her.
I’m recycling this post AGAIN because of more recently added comments***
Here is a comment I received on the post: “More issues concerning women”
I’ve always enjoyed your website and your articles until this one. Being a single woman who’s succesful and educated who’s been in dozens of happy healthy relationships with one bad ‘Jarrod’ on my record I found this pretty offensive. There is one big difference between men and women in relationships and that is women don’t want to fail a relationship and men don’t even view break-ups as failures nor do they really take it personally. I found myself in the same situation doing everything to keep my man happy while he was cheating on me and telling me he loved me. I loved him and stupidly thought he’d change for me. Women learn these things as they grow up and through experiences and it’s very unfair for you to lable this woman as someone who is a lunatic and might possibly raise more ‘Jarrods’. I highly doubt she will. The fact that she tried soo hard and still attempts to see good in him tells me that she’s going to take extra precautions to ensure her future son not grow up to be a ‘Jarrod’.
I think your story here should be aiming more towards how men do vs should treat women. Women may not be as ‘emotional’ or ‘psycho’ if they were treated a little better. Maybe you should offer a crash-course is treating women with respect rather than labeling someone as a lunatic who will raise a ‘Jarrod’.
I think it’s funny you blame this completely on the woman as being a lunatic. Do you know her or anything about her outside of an f’ed up relationship with this guy? I’ve been in dozens of very good and healthy relationships that didn’t work out for just general ‘going in different directions’ types of reasons but I’ve also been in ONE relationship just like the one described by this woman above. Being a single woman can be trying in this day for one thing. For two you never want to look into your past and have a ‘failed relationship’ and any woman who is in love will do all of these things and more to try and keep her man happy. Instead of accusing this woman of being a lunatic and potentially raising more ‘Jarrods’ why aren’t you getting down on men for being dogs to women? Why aren’t you getting down on men for taking advantage of women and lying to them? Women get soo emotionally wrapped up in relationships they honestly have no idea how far they’ve gone to keep a man until they finally withdraw themselves from the relationship, take some time and finally reflect on it. At that point they’re probably ashamed of how they behaved, irate they allowed a man to treat them soo terribly and completely jaded from having a healthy relationship anytime soon.
This is from Red State - Bill when he said this crazy shit was either on crack or he just had a mind blowing BJ.
I’m beginning to be a bit embarrassed by this continued nonsense that Hillary is somehow this great and brilliant woman.
This blog is not big enough to list all of the great women in this country both in business, politics, executive positions, community leaders, folks just Google the list of the top women executives not to forget the women around the world who are truly making a difference in all of our lives.
Forget my political leanings people; it would be almost impossible for anybody who looked closely at Hillary’s background and determine that she is the “”most gifted” person of our generation!?.” That is simply a criminally insane statement.
Bill Clinton lies like a silk sheet on a waterbed. Well, ok-he IS a silk sheet on a waterbed, but that’s not my point. I’m getting fairly accustomed to his nonsense-the great orator in modern times and all that. But really, MUST I be subjected to this?:
The former president opened a two-day swing through Iowa on behalf of his wife, packing nearly 500 people into a theater on the campus of Iowa State University.”She has spent a lifetime as a change agent when she had the option to do other things,” he said.
“I thought she was the most gifted person of our generation,” said Clinton, who said he told her, “You know, you really should dump me and go back home to Chicago or go to New York and take one of those offers you’ve got and run for office.”
OK-the urge to vomit has subsided…I can continue now.
“Most Gifted” person of our generation? Sorry, Hill…you don’t even come close babes.
Clinton spoke at Wellesley two days after a rocky debate performance in which she fought off criticism from six male presidential rivals. Thursday’s event had a decidedly “You go, girl” flavor, with reminders of the pioneering nature of her candidacy…At Wellesley, hundreds of students jammed a campus auditorium to see Clinton, many wearing T-shirts that said, “I can be president, too.” They danced in the aisles to songs like “Every Little Thing She Does is Magic” and a few shouted “We love you, Hillary!”
She’s playing the Poor Gal Card to the hilt, and her operatives are in full femme revenge mode:
Her comments at Wellesley and a new fundraising appeal from campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle suggested there was an element of sexism at play.
“On that stage in Philadelphia, we saw six against one. Candidates who had pledged the politics of hope practiced the politics of pile on instead,” Solis Doyle wrote. “Her opponents tried a whole host of attacks on Hillary. She is one strong woman. She came through it well. But Hillary’s going to need your help.”
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — Megan Williams thought she was going to a party. That’s why she tagged along with a woman she hardly knew, up a remote southern West Virginia hollow to a run-down trailer surrounded by beer cans and broken-down furniture.”But there wasn’t no party,” Williams said. “I realized I’d made a bad mistake.”
For at least a week, authorities say, the 20-year-old black woman was kept captive in a shed, tortured, beaten, forced to eat rat, dog and human feces, and raped by six white men and women who taunted her with racial slurs.
“They just kept saying ‘This is what we do to niggers down here,’” Williams told The Associated Press in one of her most extensive interviews since the shocking case made national headlines last month.
Seated in a rocking chair in her mother’s living room, about 50 miles from that shed, the slight woman with cocoa-colored skin says she was hopelessly outnumbered by people who just wanted to hurt a black person.
“I just hope they fry for what they did to me. That’s really all I got to say,” she said. “I hope they fry.”
NOW put up a website of offensive ads. I can’t believe it’s 2007 and we are still here. Seeing these images side-by-side was shocking to me and I am someone who thinks about gender and advertising. Do you think that people will understand sexism better by seeing these demeaning images side by side, with explanations as to their problems?Examples:
Recently, I was sent an email with a link to the pictures (slide show) of a young Atlanta gentleman’s elaborate (and expensive) proposal to his fiancé. It detailed the trouble and expense he went through to ask this young woman to marry him. He saved and planned for over 2 years (according to the internet lore) even moving in with his sister for 6 months. The end product involved renting 10 rooms at the Ritz Carlton, hundreds (if not thousands) of tea light candles, hundreds of roses (many of them hand dipped in gold leaf) and most of the family and friends of the two young people. She was surprised by it all, and it was beautifully taped as she went from room to room, reading what he’d written and being prayed for by every group of people she found in each room.The woman who sent it to me is a beautiful 40 something year old black woman, who has been single for 18 years and frequently bemoans her single state. I sent it onto my sister (also in her 40’s and single) and a few married women. The reaction to this young man’s efforts were divided directly in half, with the two factions being in two camps; married women and unmarried women.
All the unmarried women were mightily impressed. They were moved to tears. They sighed, pined, and wished. And they vowed to wait for a man who loved them like that.
The married women, however, were not impressed. To a woman they all reacted negatively in some fashion. One friend of mine pointed out that her FIRST husband (the one who cheated on her repeatedly and treated her with massive disrespect) had proposed to her with her father’s permission, with lots of cost and public display involved. Her 2nd and current husband’s proposal was spur of the moment in a car, alone together and after a fight; “So, I guess this means we shouldn’t get married? You wanted to marry me?! Of course! When? Next month!” Two beautiful daughters later, she will tell you that the man who spent all that money and time proposing peaked at that moment,. He only went down hill after that.
I personally thought this young man spent his money unwisely and probably did so for some less then romantic reason. But hey, what do I know; he may not be gay or desperate and she may not expect this kind of extravagance from now on.; However, I wouldn’t want a man to put on such a show for me. I’d doubt his sincerity (and gender) if I were wooed in this way. I dated millionaires and was “chased” by several men. The man that won my heart was not overtly romantic. Rather, he was real. He showed me he loved me, all the time, by being there and caring. He did not act like a woman with a penis.
I think that far too many women believe in Cinderella and Snow White. They have read the romance novels. And they believe that true love will prove itself by these public shows or romantic love. It is no wonder to me that women who buy into those versions of love are so often alone, or at least disappointed by men. They want a fantasy man – who will read their minds and love them in ways they can only imagine (and often do).
Now don’t get me wrong. I believe that true love makes sacrifices. No marriage or relationship can work if it’s too one-sided. But men, real men, are not women. They do not sit around crying over romantic commercials. The men who do cry that often/much are usually gay. Real men show their love by doing things like mowing the lawn, coming home after work instead of hitting the bars, putting dirty underwear in clothes hampers and not the floor, and rubbing a tired back once in awhile. Gifts are bought by thoughtful husbands. But the truly thoughtful husband (or potential husband) doesn’t spend the cost of one year’s rent (or mortgage payments) on a night of showy extravagance.
To me, this young man (who claimed God told him to do all these things) was afraid he’d not get a “yes” if he didn’t go “all out” for this young woman. And maybe he was/is right. Apparently there are women (grown women in their 30’s and 40’s) who want Prince Charming, and will not tolerate anything else but extravagant shows of affection. If a man has the patience and money for such displays, he might find women lining up for that princess treatment. But for all the women who are alone and hating it, here’s a hint; you may want to be more realistic. Mr. Perfect is waiting till he finds Ms. Perfect. And odds are high that you aren’t perfect. You may be perfect for some NORMAL man but you are liable to miss him if all your are doing is looking for that knight in shining armor.
I don’t want to be a princess. I want to be myself. And I want to be loved by someone who is real – not acting some part. Because for love to last it must be real. The people who want gifts and violins all the time aren’t going to like it when reality hits. . And even though this young man showed how much he loved this young woman by making a public show that was worthy of a Super Bowl half-time event, I have to wonder what he will have to do next to show his love? Has he, as my friend said, “Peaked” already?
My parents were married for 54 years and were soul mates of the first order. Dad was as romantic as any normal male; that is to say that he was not sappy. But he did cry, usually in private, with emotions too strong for verbal expression. He did not put his love or romantic side on display. They were too real and strong for that kind of crass exhibitionism. Just as the Bible counsels the wise to do their good deeds without public acclaim, so too should true love not require public displays of emotion or extravagant gifts.
My good friend Joe recently married my other good friend, Sharon. He IS a card carrying millionaire. Sharon will want for nothing that money can buy. And their wedding in Sante Fe was probably one of the most expensive and romantic ones I will EVER witness. And Joe had NOTHING to do with planning the details. He left that all to Sharon’s able hands. Joe will be a faithful, loving, devoted and attentive husband. But, like most heterosexual males, he did not give a fig about the details of planning the event. Does that mean he isn’t romantic? NO. However, he’s a MAN. A real one. He loves Sharon as much as any man can love a woman. But he’s not going to prove it Sharon by first proving it to other people. He’s too secure (AND MALE) to need that kind of help!
It is no wonder that the high-maintenance unrealistic women who hold out for the high romance kind of fantasy love evidenced in this internet piece of fluff do not find real love. They want a life that only exists in movies and books. It’s a scam. The people who want a proposal like this had better be ready to be married to a gay man, a pussy whipped man, or one who cheats on them.
Want true love? Find a real man! Learn how to spot them! Here’s a hint; they will NOT be dipping roses in gold leaf!
LAS CRUCES (link) – A 30-year-old Las Cruces woman was in custody Wednesday, charged with having sexual contact with an 8-year-old boy, Las Cruces police reported.
Michelle A. Tufts, 30, of the 2800 block of east Idaho Avenue, was arrested Monday and is charged with two felony counts of criminal sexual penetration of a child younger than 13 and one count of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.Last week, the boy’s grandmother notified police that Tufts might be having an inappropriate physical relationship with the boy, Las Cruces Police Department spokesman Dan Trujillo said.
Police detectives investigated the reports and concluded the allegations were accurate, Trujillo said.
Tufts is being held at the Doña Ana County Detention Center, and her bond is set at $50,000.
Wow I say Nancy Pelosi on the View this morning and was shocked. The leader of the most ethical congress in history has been in hiding for quite some time.
Yesterday, Nancy Pelosi was interviewed by Wolf Blitzer about why the Democratic Congress refuses to end the war they were elected to end. She said she needs two-thirds of the votes in each house to override a veto.Nancy, you can audit my class in the Constitution anytime.”All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives…”
That means that to end the war, the House must simply fail to pass a bill to continue funding it. That would take a tie vote!
They could also pass a bill to fund the withdrawal. The President could veto that but then would look like an ass and a liar if he later complained that he lacked the funds to withdraw the troops.
On CSPAN, Joe Biden mumbled out some scenario like “I won’t leave troops in the field without equipment.” Huh? Joe, when the Congress cuts off funding, the program must cease. If the President continues a federal program without authorization, he should be impeached. If his intentional disregard for the Constitution causes a single unnecessary death, he should be prosecuted.
All told, the Democratic proposal for an “Iraq tax” lasted about four hours. That’s roughly the amount of time from when House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) gave life to the idea with his endorsement to when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) strangled it.“Just as I have opposed the war from the outset, I am opposed to a draft and I am opposed to a war surtax,” Pelosi said in a statement issued this afternoon.
Pelosi continues to hide from the Moonbats who are still waiting for her to end this damm war!!!
Tonganoxie, Kansas (from Lawrence Journal World) — Tonganoxie Mayor Mike Vestal admitted Friday to sending an e-mail containing the picture of a naked woman and a racist joke to several individuals. He offered to resign his position as mayor, if that is what residents wish.“Oh my God, oh my God. You’ve got to be kidding me. Oh, Lord have mercy,” Vestal said this afternoon when a Journal-World reporter showed him a copy of the e-mail that was sent from his account.
The e-mail opened with the words, “Next Monday is National Female Breast Appreciation Day.” It then showed a picture of a woman and her naked breasts. Underneath the picture were the words, “Beats the fuck out of Martin Luther King Day! Doesn’t It?”
Vestal admitted to sending the e-mail Aug. 31 from his account to a “couple of guys.” He inadvertently sent it to a 6News reporter, and that is how the Journal-World obtained the e-mail.
Vestal apologized to Tonganoxie residents for any embarrassment, and said the e-mail’s content did not represent his beliefs.
“This is something I don’t usually do,” said Vestal, although he stopped short of saying this was the first time he had ever forwarded such an e-mail message. “I should have just deleted it.
“I apologize. I hope people will forgive me. I’m proud of what I do for the city. I don’t know how I’m going to make it up to the people. It will never happen again.
“If the citizens want me to resign, I will resign. It was a bad error in judgment.”
Tonganoxie Councilman Jim Truesdell said Friday that he was shocked by the e-mail.
“That’s obviously wrong,” Truesdell said of the e-mail’s content. “But it is even worse that it mocks Martin Luther King Day and women. It is obviously distasteful.”
Vestal, who was elected in April, works for an answering service that is owned by his wife. The service also has a contract with the city of Tonganoxie to function as the dispatch service for the Tonganoxie Police Department. Vestal sent the e-mail from a computer that he owns, and from an e-mail account that he pays for, he said. But it is the e-mail account that is listed as his official point of contact as the city’s mayor.
Tonganoxie city employees are required to sign an agreement that prohibits employees to “knowingly communicate, download, or forward anything that might be construed as harassing, hostile or offensive based on ethnicity, race, sex, disability, age, religion or national origin.”
Vestal said he never had seen the agreement before, and it was unclear whether he is subject to the agreement as either the city’s mayor or an employee of a contractor that does business with the city.
Vestal said he did not know how many people he sent the e-mail to. The e-mail obtained by the Journal-World did not list the addresses of the recipients, but used a function that hid the addresses from view. Vestal also declined to say who sent him the e-mail, although he said that person was not involved in city government.
Truesdell said the community now would have to decide whether to stand behind its mayor. Truesdell said he was inclined to support Vestal, whom he called a good leader that treated council members fairly.
“I would hate to see him resign or be removed from office. I think he has done a lot of good for the community,” Truesdell said. “But it probably will be up to the people. I could see a lot of people objecting on a lot of different fronts to having someone like that in office.
“But I really don’t think that is Mike Vestal. I don’t think that is who he is.”
Councilman Tom Putthoff declined to comment on the e-mail until he had a chance to discuss it with Vestal. Attempts to reach other council members were unsuccessful.
Distraught Mother Describes Forgotten Daughter’s Death in Hot SUV
Friday, September 7th, 2007
We can now hear, for the first time, Brenda Slaby’s emotional and personal account of what happened August 23. That’s the day Slaby left her two-year-old daughter in a hot car while working at Glen Este Middle School.
Slaby’s comments are contained in a two-hour interview done with Union Township police.
She wonders out loud, “How can I go on?” She frets, “Good mothers don’t do this!” She worries that she failed her daughter.
Clermont County prosecutor Don White didn’t prosecute Slaby because he found Cecilia’s death was an accident.
Union Township police had recommended a charge of child endangering.
Look if you are that damm self absorbed, selfish or scatterbrained to take parental responsibility, then do us all a favor, do not have fucken kids, don’t procreate your particular DNA frankly is not needed and not required.
All of you idiot people who leave babies in cars, back over them in driveways, leave them in stores, leave them in hotel rooms while you enjoy a nice dinner, drown them in bathtubs, smoke in your cars while they are held hostage in the back seat, refuse to change shitty diapers, keep them in the same fucken clothes for days on end, allow them to walk barefoot in Walmart, send them to the store to buy your cigarettes and lotto tickets, allow them to “play” with your pit-bull and beat them because your life is fucked up; do us all a favor why not lock yourself in a hot car with an exhaust hose.
Those stories would not bother me quite as much.
I bet these are some of the same people who were outraged at Michael Vick’s dog antics, funny how you people choose to be outraged by dog abuse but totally ignore when children are being abused by stupid ass parents.
Even the worst pickup lines — “You remind me of a parking ticket, because you’ve got FINE written all over you,” for instance — serve an evolutionary purpose, according to a team of psychologists in Scotland.
Researchers at the University of Edinburgh have conducted a study of opening lines uttered by would-be Casanovas, which appears in an October issue of the psychology journal Personality and Individual Differences.
Why a study on pickup lines? More than just another opportunity for embarrassment in the pursuit of love, opening remarks reveal volumes about character and also whom the user is trying to attract.
Peter Caryl, one of the study’s authors, figured this warranted a closer look.
Most people probably know that a bad pickup line will quickly end the encounter, he says, but “I don’t expect that most of them think they’re revealing anything about their genes or fitness by speaking to someone new in a bar.”
Pickup lines have long been a staple of pop culture, often mined for comedy. In VH1’s reality show “The Pickup Artist,” a fellow named Mystery (the self-proclaimed world’s greatest pickup artist) coaches down-on-their-luck schlubs on meeting women.
But Caryl and his team in Edinburgh have the pickup line down to a science, literally. For the study, 127 women completed a survey to determine their personality types. They were then asked to rate the effectiveness of 40 vignettes, each one describing a scenario of a man trying to strike up a conversation with a woman.
Individuals differed, but extroverted women tended to prefer funny opening lines, and nonconformist women resisted displays of wealth. Chivalry appealed widely; a scenario in which a potential suitor chides drunken louts who cut in line won the hearts of females in all personality categories.
In an earlier study, the researchers ranked the effectiveness of the same 40 vignettes, some written by the researchers and others culled from TV, movies and Web sites. Canned jokes and compliments did poorly, while remarks that reflected the specific situation or surroundings did best. Offering thoughts on a painting at a museum worked (though it helps to know something about art), as did asking for help in picking out a watch for a friend.
Opening lines with sexual innuendo — “What has 148 teeth and can hold back the Incredible Hulk? My fly,” for example — ranked toward the bottom of the list. But that doesn’t stop guys from using them. Caryl theorizes that these lines are the users’ way of zeroing in on more promiscuous women. If she’s still talking to you after your Incredible Hulk joke (which ranked 36 out of 40), there’s a better chance that she’s up for a one-night stand.
Generally, the 60 men surveyed did well predicting which remarks would work best but overestimated the effectiveness of the risqué lines.
“College women are at the highest risk for unintended pregnancy because they’re sexually active, they’re very fertile,and they are away from home,” says Dr. Shulman
I thought nappy headed project skanks or toothless tobacco chewing trailer bimbos were at the highest risk, imagine that.
See, talk about us right leaning types not reading, this is the kind of crazy shit I love reading. This is supposed to be a serious story, but it’s riddled with so much comedic material I swear that it must be satire and I’m being set-up.
See for yourself.
Paula Tran, a senior at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, relies on her school’s health center for affordable birth control pills. Even though she doesn’t have insurance, she bought a year supply from the clinic for only $7 per pack last fall. But when she goes back for more this September, she’ll be hit with a bill five times that amount, something she says will definitely affect her spending. “It will cut into the kinds of notebooks I buy to the kind of groceries I get to the cable package that I order,” she says.
See I told ya…what kind of fucken cable package she can order!!?
(link) For decades college campus health centers have been a resource for budget-conscious female students seeking birth control. Because of agreements with pharmaceutical companies, most campus clinics were able to distribute brand name prescription contraceptives, from pills to the patch to a monthly vaginal device like NuvaRing, for no more than a couple of bucks.That all ended earlier this year. Health experts say the price bump for college students was inadvertent — a byproduct of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, a federal law that went into effect in January. The law alters how drug makers calculate Medicaid-related rebates paid to states, but it ultimately made it expensive for companies to offer schools such deep discounts on birth control. As a result, brand name prescription prices for campus clinics rose from about the $3 to $10 range per month to the $30 to $50 range. Organon, the maker of Cyclessa and Desogen birth control pills and the NuvaRing, says the company is not happy about having to increase prices for colleges. But Nick Hart, Organon’s executive director of contraception, says they were forced to make “a business decision” after the law went into effect.
A 2006 survey conducted by the American College Health Association (ACHA) found that 39% of undergraduate women use oral contraceptives. Many providers are afraid that if the convenience of free or cheap birth control on campus is taken away, female students might just get turned off by prescription birth control methods altogether and use other less effective ones like condoms or Plan B, known as the morning after pill.
According to Planned Parenthood, and many worry if students skip out on it or move to a method they’re not as comfortable with, it can lead to more unwanted student pregnancies. “I think there are some who will just try to wing it and see how it goes. They’ll say ‘Well I go to school here, my boyfriend is in another city and I only see him once or twice a month and I won’t use anything’ rather than pay for something they can’t afford.
Tran: “I have friends who refuse to talk to their parents about it, they’re unable to get under their insurance, can’t afford to get their own insurance and are already working just to pay tuition,” she says. “Some have stopped already and are taking stock in Plan B and having that around because they don’t have regular intercourse.”
Oh Snoop now your not going to insult millions and millions of college skanks around the nation are you?
Well with this kind of logic:
Susan Maly, a 22-year-old student at the University of Iowa, says she struggled with switching pills recently,
She finds the dramatic price increase “unfair” to women who have come to rely on birth control, and feel comfortable with the brand they are on.
Sure why not. They sure as hell don’t read this blog…
Shit, I just got the NFL Sunday ticket and it is about $40 more than it was the last time I had it, I think the gubment should subsidize that price difference.
What is tougher, men giving up football or young college skanks giving up sex?
Tough one huh?
C’mon libs want the gubment out of their bedrooms, but when it’s time to engage in headboard banging activity you mean that these educated skanks want me to pay to keep them from fucking up their lives.
Let me think this one out, I’m in.. let’s say, med school or law school, not some bullshit major like liberal arts. I want to finish school and get that degree so I can make the big bucks and become successful, BUT that hunk Brad is looking might fine in those jeans and I could sure use a good pelvic ass clapping workout about now. Just throw down a few drinks and we can get busy!
Oh shit that evil G Dub took that money meant for my weekend skank activities and now how am I going to afford my cell phone, my (real) boyfriends cell phone, i-pod, tanning time, nail care, gas for my SUV (thanks mom and daddy), cable TV, dorm room stripper pole, batteries for my vibrator for between classes, tickets to Tori Amos, the mean green, shoes, purse….damm!
Yes the media is absolutely sure that university students are just too fucken stupid to stay out of such trouble. Shit, we can’t expect students to think of their future, finish school, get their degree and begin their lives in a planned and sensible way, can we?
We have to play nanny to hold their hands, er uh p..is, er uh contraception… for them.
Woman charged with kidnap, rape of 10-year-old student
Tuesday, August 14th, 2007
A former elementary school teacher in Tacoma, Wash., is behind bars for allegedly kidnapping and raping her 10-year-old student numerous times.Jennifer Rice, 31, is said to have met the fourth-grade boy shortly after being hired last year as a replacement teacher at McKinley Elementary School.
She was taken into custody Saturday and booked into the Pierce County Jail for investigation of kidnapping, five counts of first-degree child rape, and four counts of child molestation.
Rice pleaded not guilty yesterday as she’s being held on $500,000 bail.
Police documents indicate Rice took the boy with her when she left a party in his East Tacoma neighborhood around 3 a.m. Thursday. Authorities claim the two were headed for an amusement park in Idaho when they stopped at a rest area, napped and then had sex.
published by St. Martin’s Press this week…..
