VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY HILLARY COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘Stupid jackass elected folks’ Category

Hey Ferraro you are a stupid racist ass old white skank, unfortunately people like you are the biggest voting block

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

Before you read my rant watch Keith Olbermann go off on Ferraro and Hillary. This is the first time I actually agreed with this dude on anything.

This race shit if the Democrats don’t fix it will doom the party. Now nothing would make me happier, BUT, although I am a conservative I still function with the mindset that for America to be a strong nation both sides of the political divide must field quality competent individuals and let the battle of ideas decide the direction of the country.
Although watching the Clinton campaign circle the drain with their racial mudslinging and identity politics is amusing it is not good for the nation. 

Having this skank ass old white bitch Ferraro sounding off like David Duke is a further reminder of why my comments below are more correct than not.
***********

***********

I have to rant about this to remind myself why I named this blog Political Party Poop.
I read on some obscure blog by this dude trying to explain this racial mess the Democrats are in regarding the racial civil war between Hillary and Obama.
He states that we have three choices for president; a white dude, an aging white lady and a middle aged black dude and your choice basically lies with who you identify with the most.

Reading not only his statement but others basically babbling about the notion that we pick our political leaders simply based on physical characteristics is more than a little disturbing.
This particular dude is a Hillary supporter, but he does like Obama and he is trying to grasp (as is Geraldine Ferraro) how this relatively unknown black dude can be so close to the presidency. They wonder how did this Negro slip through the cracks of the Democratic Party machine.

Let me tell you why I find Ferraro’s comments over the top offensive.
First she used the same comment to describe the Jackson campaign years ago. Uppity ass white people - when trying to explain their racist tendencies towards black folks who manage to break through the racist haze - must somehow try to explain how that nigga was able to get that position, whether it is a political position, work or business related.

As Shelby Steele pointed out, all of us black folks must wear the survival masks to muck our way through society. Some of us are just better at playing the game then others.
I have been in countless situations where I have been the only black individual who was part of some major project, or chaired some committee or organization. And I have heard, via friends, that rednecks questioned my participation and my “standing.” They wanted to know what I brought to the table. Besides my blackness that is.

I mentioned in a post long ago that when I first got the job I now occupy, my predecessor who could not perform the job because he did not have the technical skills, asked me point blank when I met him, “what is your background, what are your qualifications for this position” before we even finished our handshake. I wanted to punch the mutherfucker.

What white person do you know, who has a job position, high paid or high profile, would be asked by someone “how’d the fuck did you get this gig?” I’m thinking “I don’t know, I FUCKEN APPLIED FOR THE POSITION.”
Unfortunately that would not be the last time individuals would take a double take when I told them my current job title.

Again it has nothing to do with anything other than perception. If I were a fucken delivery driver or some other common laborer, if I were sweeping the floors of my lovely facility nobody would blink and eye.
That is what this racist world expects of a black man.

Shit I work on a campus, your typical liberal bastion of educational endeavors and except for some black folks in such fields as African-American studies there are no black people around here. Hell there is only one black dude working in the entire campus maintenance department. Niggas can’t even get a job cutting the grass here. There are not even black folks working in the mess halls. I know we are a small percentage of the total population in Kansas, but I am convinced that there would be more blacks hired if the employers did not know our race before they made the decision.

I must say there is one black provost who is the head of campus technology. Must have been a quota hire. See, that is why people like Ferraro and her ilk assume that any black had help to get to a higher level.
Now keep in mind folks, my job don’t pay jack but I am responsible for the care for a high profile facility and they gave me the biggest fanciest office in the place, and perhaps in the whole town. When folks, particularly old white folks ask and when I tell them my job title more than a few people have asked me “how did you get this job?”
I have to wonder, would they ask that question if I were white? I don’t think so!

Shit if blacks are seen on college campuses white folks automatically think “affirmative action.” Same thing if we are in the corporate world. More than a few of us have endured the “quota” hire rant.
Every damn time black folks manage to achieve their little tiny piece of the pie, people like Ferraro, and especially old white people, need to attach the “well he or she must be a nigga quota hire or appointment.”

I have no plan to vote for Obama, because he is a closet Socialist and a flaming liberal. I don’t give a fuck what your color or background he is, if I find your particular brand of politics offensive I won’t vote for you and I damn sure can’t identify with you.

At Mrs. Snoops’ birthday dinner party the other night I was explaining to a friend, my still held belief that all of the Obama hype is fleeting, that white people when it comes time to vote will not pull the lever or tap the touch screen for a black dude particularly a black man.

Let me be even more specific, I seriously doubt that any Asian or relatively few Mexicans will vote for him, Mexicans don’t like black people, don’t get along with them. Most Mexicans would send black folks back to Africa faster than Robert Byrd.
That is why I have no problem voicing my disdain for illegal immigration. These Mexicans are not coming over here to become “American citizens.” They want their fucken country back and assimilating with the gringos, while stooping to mowing their lawns, making up hotel beds and building backyard decks for a few dollars an hour is just the ticket to keep the gringos at ease. Yea, I know, I’m stereo typing. I learned it from whitey!

I’m still not convinced, particularly with the heightened racial tensions that continue to boil over, that there is a significant enough number of white people who will put this nation in the hands of a black dude.
He needs 52 or 53 million people must win the majority of white men. He cannot win if no other racial or ethnic group is going to largely vote for a Negro.
Talks about racial identity! Scores of white people have little or no ongoing contact with black folks. Don’t work with any, don’t socialize with any, never dated a Negro, never went to grade school with one and more than likely never attend college with a Negro.
There are few if any positive black role models on TV and in the movies.
Sunday political talk shows are crammed with talking head old white people, all major radio broadcast talk shows on the right or left are by white folks.
Few influential black folks in the major news media and of course the majority of today’s decision makers are mostly white.
Still, today a white father’s worst nightmare is to have his lovely daughter marrying a Negro. That is still morally repugnant in the minds of way too many rednecks.

I’m black and my “Negro” friends all live on the east and west coasts. I can go days and not see another Negro in my humble little progressive (read liberal) town.
After all of that - you people want to still try and convince me that enough white people will say “fuck it” and hand the keys to the White House to a black dude? Oh I forgot to mention that a great number of white people are still trying to hand the Muslim tag around his neck.
“Gee won’t it be peachy keen to have a Negro as president?” Seriously folks I would need to smoke some really good weed to process that reality.

“But Snoop what about the primaries and the fact that he won white states like Vermont and Iowa” Look, I don’t discount Hillary hatred.
Obama is winning over the more educated and progressive white folks. The more education a given white person has the more likely they are to support Obama, because any rational thinking person would never consider Hillary, which is why she is most popular with lower middle class white folks particularly poor white women and old white women.

If on election night I am wrong I will have no problem admitting it.

Back to Obama. This black dude represents the hopes and dreams for black folks that somehow his presidency will transform niggas into more productive citizens when that is just a pipe dream. Yea. Right.
At the dinner party - and I have told Mrs. Snoop and others this many times - I said that nothing pisses me off more that to have someone tell me that Obama’s potential presidency will somehow transform me, I guess since I’m a black dude. On inauguration day somehow I will become a slightly better human being. I will suddenly be accepted for who I am without regard for my race. Fuck that. No magic negro is going to wave the magic wand and make the racists all think well of a black man!

Now I can see through the political crap and do often ridicule Obama’s ascendancy to the presidency, but when people like that fuck Ferraro feel that it is her obligation to remind the masses that your support of this unqualified Negro is “foolish” it is more than a bit insulting.
A nigger at the top of the Democratic ticket “that is just outrageous!”
It’s only because dude is black. Yup it tis funny that a great number of white people, mostly politically ignorant young people who see a vote for Obama as a vote against the man. Never mind that nobody reached the presidency has ever gotten there without dealing with “the man.” He will become “the man” and not much will really change!
Obama leading the Democrat presidential race was Howard Dean’s worst nightmare.
I would hope that black folks will continue to keep a close tab on the future racist statements that will come from the mouths of various Democrats. Hopefully black folks will finally start to comprehend that neither political party has a monopoly on your well being and by continuing to vote Democrat they give creative license to people like Ferraro.
When Ferraro was supposedly fighting for Negros as a politician, she saw herself as the slave master. All Democrats see black folks this way.
They are just simply tools to achieve political power. And how dare we not do things according to their master plan for us!?
They (the Ferraro’s of the world) never envisioned a time where some stray Negro would usurp their rightful place at the top of this countries political ivory towers.

Sphere: Related Content

Fred08!? - Some of y’all got played by that fake ass candidacy….

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008

fred1.jpgFound this via Wonkette 

Have you visited Fred Thompson’s campaign website lately? Probably not, what with how he was the world’s lamest candidate and nobody voted for him and he won nothing and then he woke up and quit. That explains why his website is now blank, except for the word “Success.” [Fred ‘08]

Sphere: Related Content

Men are pigs worldwide!

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008


 pigs2.jpg

From Gateway Pundit Another Prostitution Ring Busted… Tehran Police Chief Caught in Bed With 6 Hookers

 Player-Player…
The Tehran Police Chief, Reza Zarei, was caught in a bed with six- Yes SIX -hookers.
AKI reported:

Tehran’s police chief, Reza Zarei (photo), has been arrested after he was found nude in a local brothel with six naked prostitutes, according to report on the Iranian Farda News.

Be sure to check out: Spitzer Would Be Rare Democrat to Resign After Scandal

Sphere: Related Content

Calling all GOP Purists: It’s time to support John McCain

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008


298isi.jpg

(link to post from Red State) I realize, of course, that many of you have no intention of supporting John McCain, and no amount of rah-rah “Go Team!” rhetoric is going to persuade you otherwise. Once again, I get it. Lord knows that Senator McCain has torched many a bridge. But let’s get real for a moment, shall we? The Republican brand is about as popular right now as the kid with blue dye next to him in the swimming pool, and that fact isn’t going to change any time soon. The brutal truth of the matter is that John McCain may be our only hope this year. And while many of you no doubt have fantasies about how time in the wilderness will help bring about a restoration of the “Real Republican Party” (as I often did re: Rudy), the reality is that a great deal of damage can be done by a President Obama or Clinton in the next four years. Is that something you’re really willing to risk? Three to four Supreme Court appointments? Major tax increases? Implementation of a radical proabortion agenda? Dialing down the War on Terror? Perhaps you are willing to do just that. But as for me and my house, we will strongly support John McCain for president. He may not be perfect, but he’s a damn fine politician, and he’s light years better than Obama or Clinton.

I’m only posting because I find it more than a little amusing that bloggers are still posting shit like this in support of McCain.
I have said it before and I will say again, no “conservative” minded individual would write such drivel.
McCain is simply unacceptable. He will get some play from right leaning folks because as this dude does they will buy into the “fear” card, for example “Obama is this crazy liberal and will destroy the country.” Jimmy Carter sucked as a president, fucked up some things but anyone who say that any single individual can “destroy” this nation is either willfully ignorant or on the campaign payroll.

If someone from the McCain campaign wants to contact ole Snoop and pay to have me write positive shit about him or hell I’ll post vote McCain shit on my blog all day for enough money.

Yes, Snoop can be bought, but I’m not cheap! Hey I’m saving up for a hot tub for the back yard.

larryvillesnoop@hotmail.com

I’ll be waiting for a reply from Johnny!

Sphere: Related Content

Bitter lesson for McCain, never EVER trust liberals…

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

liberalmedia_animation_sm.gif

Rush in an e-mail to Politico:Well I’m one of those bloggers who does not give a shit about the McCain story. Rush’s quote basically sums it up;


“The story is not the story. The story is the Drive By media turning on its favorite maverick and trying to take him out. The media picked the GOP’s candidate, the NYT endorsed him while they sat on this story, and is now, with utter predictability, trying to destroy him.”“This is what you get when you walk across the aisle and try to make these people your friends. I’m not surprised in the least that the NYT would try to take out John McCain. Predicted this, in fact, way back in the early 2000s. Sen. McCain courted the media, cultivated them, even bragged that the media was his ‘base.’ I cringed when I heard it because the media turning on McCain was as predictable as the sun rising in the morning.”

In case y’all forgot: From the Times


We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for president. The leading candidates have no plan for getting American troops out of Iraq. They are too wedded to discredited economic theories and unwilling even now to break with the legacy of President Bush. We disagree with them strongly on what makes a good Supreme Court justice.

Still, there is a choice to be made, and it is an easy one. Senator John McCain of Arizona is the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe. With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation, he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field.

Man I still can’t read without laughing!

Sphere: Related Content

Frisco’s Mayor to pay “climate aide” $160,000 a year!

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008


2007-10-17globalwarming.jpg

The brilliant scam continues. I have said often, global warming is not about “saving the planet” it’s about money, jobs, research dollars, growing gubment.


In his quest to make San Francisco the greenest city in the nation, Mayor Gavin Newsom recently created a $160,000-a-year job for a senior aide and gave him the ambitious-sounding title of director of climate protection initiatives.

One might expect someone with such an exalted handle to solve global warming and save the rain forest all in a day’s work.

But the new climate protection initiatives director is just the latest person to join the city payroll in the name of tackling global climate woes, raising questions about whether environmentalism is becoming the latest excuse for a bloating government payroll.

San Francisco has at least two dozen other city employees already working directly on climate issues at a cost to taxpayers of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“Although it sounds very well intentioned, and perhaps even necessary, I’m concerned this is a case where eco-chic has gone out of control,” said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, the only Green Party member on the Board of Supervisors.

Newsom’s critics in City Hall have pounced on the amorphous “climate protection” title and have blasted the mayor for creating the new role - as well as for creating new jobs for other members of his senior circle and doling out hefty pay raises - while the city braces for a projected $233 million deficit next fiscal year and lawmakers contemplate reducing hospital operating room hours and delaying playground improvement projects to balance the budget.

READ THE REST

Sphere: Related Content

What’s in a Name? - John McCain: “the leader of the loyal opposition.”

Monday, February 18th, 2008


johnmccainpirate1.jpg

It’s easy to forget that the Arizona senator is not, in fact, a Democrat. In the past year he has stood against his party on so many prominent and contentious issues that his concurrences with GOP dogma have become more of an exception than a rule. In the conservative media, he has become a figure of vilification on par with Tom Daschle.

Last fall, when his name came up in a meeting of House Republicans, he was booed. And it is no exaggeration to say that he has co-sponsored virtually the entire domestic agenda of the Democratic Party. One prominent Democrat enthuses, “He’s the leader of the loyal opposition.” Typically that role falls to a leader of the opposition party. But the most popular and effective champion of the Democratic Party’s values isn’t Tom Daschle. It’s John McCain.

And at a moment when the party is casting about for a leader to define it against a popular president, and McCain is casting about for a home after his virtual expulsion from the GOP, there is an obvious solution to both dilemmas: John McCain ought to become a Democrat–and a presumptive front-runner for the party’s presidential nomination in 2004.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE -  by Jonathan Chait - The New Republic Post Date Thursday, April 29, 2002


Mark Levin on John McKein

********
mccain3.jpg

Sphere: Related Content

Obama — Ready To Use Your Money To Fight American Global Poverty

Monday, February 18th, 2008

I read this last week and forgot to post for y’all who might have missed. A look into an Obama administration.

shakedown.gif“Lowering the American standard of living will not solve world poverty. It will not increase America’s image and it will be quickly sucked into the coffers of every despot on the planet. The poor will remain poor and despots will be enriched. Anyone who doesn’t understand this is not worthy of government office. “

********

By Cliff Kincaid - From the website Conservative Truth 

A nice-sounding bill called the “Global Poverty Act,” sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.

The bill, which is item number four on the committee’s business meeting agenda,  passed the House by a voice vote last year because most members didn’t realize what was in it. Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require. According to the website of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, no hearings have been held on the Obama bill in that body.

A release from the Obama Senate office about the bill declares, “In 2000, the U.S. joined more than 180 countries at the United Nations Millennium Summit and vowed to reduce global poverty by 2015. We are halfway towards this deadline, and it is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day.”

The legislation itself requires the President “to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

The bill defines the term “Millennium Development Goals” as the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000).

The U.N. says that “The commitment to provide 0.7% of gross national product (GNP) as official development assistance was first made 35 years ago in a General Assembly resolution, but it has been reaffirmed repeatedly over the years, including at the 2002 global Financing for Development conference in Monterrey, Mexico. However, in 2004, total aid from the industrialized countries totaled just $78.6 billion—or about 0.25% of their collective GNP.”

READ THE REST

Sphere: Related Content

“Larry Elder Supports John McCain” - Now I will explain why I don’t give a shit!

Friday, February 15th, 2008


mccaincourage.jpg

With all due respect to my fellow blogger at Politik Ditto and any other “conservative, republican blogger or part time pundit, I’m stunned at the amount of limited political framework many of you people have.Now this particular quote is from Larry Elder, you can read the full quote here, but this is symptomatic of what I keep reading in the right blogsphere and from right leaning pundits who are either remarkable clueless or are simply trying to kiss John McCain’s tired ass because they don’t want to be thrown under the bus when the old bastard wins the presidency.

This is why, when you listen to pundits, either on the radio or on one of the increasingly annoying talk shows take that into consideration, what do they have to gain by dissing McCain? If you are a Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin who are steadfast in their disdain for McCain they don’t give a fuck about McCain and their success does not hinge on McCain blessing them or reaching out to them.

But before I continue, read the quote:

As to the Supreme Court, think of the many 5-4 decisions, including but not limited to, Bush v. Gore, the decision that put President Bush in the White House. McCain supported nominees like Justices Alito, Thomas, Scalia, and Roberts. Why, he even voted for the “reactionary” Judge Robert Bork. Justice John Paul Stevens is 87 years old, with four more justices near or over 70. One more conservative appointee, and Roe v. Wade could be history. Are principled conservatives truly willing to allow that decision to remain for at least another generation? To quote another John, this time McEnroe, “You cannot be serious!”

Now first ask yourself, why would Elder make this particular statement? I’m thinking no shit Sherlock, that would be one seemingly logical assumption. But Elder is on the lower rung of the talk show posse. Don’t you think that with Elder, being right leaning that he just might want McCain to appear on his talk show one of these days?

However as we will soon see pundits will keep this bullshit trying to browbeat folks into being more enthusiastic about McCain. I’m like fuck McCain, don’t like him, won’t vote for him and I have my little corner of the blogsphere to give my 100 percent honest assessment of him.
Just imagine us in a nice pub somewhere knocking down some shots of your favorite whisky chatting.

First McCain in his early days will no doubt rail about Iraq, the war on terror, national security, bla bla bla, Democrats will again be pissed at fucking up another run at the White House and will no doubt will be bitching that Bush stole the election AGAIN.
But remember more than being president these people run for the presidency to leave a legacy and McCain, someone who is already prone to working with idiot Democrats in order to “get things done” on the domestic front, he will no doubt throw out the olive branch for his domestic agenda.

This is where our friend Elder is either remarkable dense or he conveniently leaves it out of his little rant.

McCain likely will be facing a Congress with larger majorities of Democrats than it now has.
It is far more likely that there will be significant Democratic gains in the Senate. The House looks decent for them too. If President McCain wants legislative victories, he will have to turn to those majorities to get them enacted. And he will be happy to do so. That’s how McCain has always operated, and there is no reason to believe that if he becomes president, he will operate in any other manner.

The conservatives who have opposed McCain during the campaign have cited his positions on immigration, campaign finance, climate change, tax cuts, and legal rights for detainees where he has sided with Democrats.

When McCain decides to work with the Democrats, he is really with them full throttle.
McCain is not someone who simply reaches across the aisle to form coalitions with the other side. He walks across the aisle, and gets into the Democrat huddle.
Every president wants to accomplish shit, no matter how stupid; anyone with any measure of common fucken sense knows he will have to do so on the Democrats’ terms.
So people like Elder can run this “Supreme Court bullshit” all they want, but if you think McCain will be able to get away with nominating conservative leaning types to the court you are badly mistaken.

A John McCain presidency will be a huge disaster for Republicans, that statement is slight irrelevant now of course, if Obama is the Democrat nominee, McCain will be the prez unless he does something or says something stupid in a debate like, “we are going to be in Iraq for 100 years.” Old white people are the strongest voting block, old white people, now in their late 60’s or 70’s, the ones who either stood on the sidelines, pretended that it was not going on, or did not give a shit while black folks we being lynched, and denied access to public places and creating suburbia escaping from Negros are not likely to vote for a socialist Negro.

These Republicans like Romney who are now speaking up for McKein, are doing so out of party loyalty and possible future perks.
Political pundits who speak in favor of McCain are doing so because they want to get on his good side.
Jesus people when you read or hear about candidate endorsements ask yourself one simple question, what does that individual have to gain by pimping for candidate A or B?

If McCain is the prez, and you are a reporter or pundit you don’t think dude will have you sitting in the corner of the White House briefing room behind a support post?
Consider this the next time you read these blogs now as many of them are now political insiders and subject to perks.

Politics are not that difficult to figure out when you factor in the “what’s in it for me” element.

Sphere: Related Content

When Obama, Clinton and McCain Decisively Agreed

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

mccain01.jpgBy Terence P. Jeffrey - CNSNews.com Editor in Chief


One thing Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain all have in common is that they voted to give retroactive Social Security benefits to illegal aliens who committed document fraud.Indeed, McCain voted for it before he was against it.

On May 18, 2006, when the immigration reform proposal advocated by McCain was on the Senate floor, Sen. John Ensign of Nevada offered an amendment.

As written, the bill immunized illegal aliens from being prosecuted for document fraud, including using a stolen, or a fake, Social Security number. Additionally, the bill did not stop the current practice of allowing aliens who are eventually granted permanent legal residency to go back and claim credit with the Social Security Administration for work they did as an illegal.

Thus, the immigration reform proposal advocated by McCain in 2006 would not only have added millions of illegal aliens to Social Security rolls, it would have protected these aliens from being prosecuted for fraudulently using other people’s Social Security numbers.

READ THE REST HERE

Don’t mind this tho… because McKein will unite the conservatives…
There are obviously some folks who have been suckered into buying into McKein’s bullshit, but the operative question for you McKein supporters is ‘Who needs a weird old coot in the White House?’

Sphere: Related Content

John McCain funded by Soros since 2001

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008


sorosratsa.jpg

From World Net Daily


As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with left-wing donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros’ Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry’s Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

READ THE REST HERE

Sphere: Related Content

The White House wants a $1.4 billion stimulus/national security package…for Mexico!!!

Monday, February 11th, 2008

bushmexico.jpgFrom Michelle Malkin - Another reason why I need to stop reading the news/blogs because I read more and more shit like this that just pisses me the hell off!

****

A reader asked me to check into information that President Bush was pushing a massive foreign-aid package to Mexico to help them secure their southern border against the flow of illegal aliens from Central America.“We can’t even get our own border straight, and we are going to provide Mexico with funding so they can solve their problem,” the reader fumed. “I doubt the Central Americans are staying very long in Mexico anyway. We know where they are going!”

Too outrageously outrageous to be true?

Well, I checked it out and it’s even worse than the reader described. Far worse.

The plan is called “The Merida Initiative.” Seems that the White House has had this plan in the works for nearly a year with little congressional input on either side of the border.

READ MORE HERE

Sphere: Related Content

If I wanted to vote for a damm Democrat I would have joined the Democrat Party!

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

I’m reposting because I guess mutherfuckers are just to dense to “get it!”

*************
“ Sen. McCain overall is a moderate-conservative, or somewhat but not firmly in the conservative camp. More specifically, he is fiscal conservative, a social moderate-conservative, but a foreign policy moderate (e.g., he favors the War in Iraq, but also wants to shut down Gitmo and opposes torture). He is also a Republican Party loyalist. These ratings also tell me that Sen. Clinton is firmly in the liberal camp (i.e., not a moderate-liberal), and is a Democratic Party loyalist.”"many conservatives are allowing Sen. McCain’s 35% liberal ideology to override his 65% conservative ideology. Now conservatives could argue that Sen. McCain is “insufficiently” conservative for their tastes. However, to argue that he is a liberal is just plain ridiculous. I guess I am just too pragmatic and logical to be a partisan. I really don’t get these conservatives who are in blind dislike, emotionally-based meltdown mode over Sen. John McCain.”

*************

gop_elephant_flipoff.jpgOver the last several days I have been actively seeking blog posts and Columns containing the idea that (individuals like myself) need to “teach the Republicans a lesson.” This position is usually taken by those in the media and by paid blogs writers who are waving their nasty ass finger at those of us who refuse to play the political game of “crown the clown.” They want us to vote for someone simply because they have an (R) after their name. They want those of us who still insist upon conservative ideals and principals in our leaders to just “shut the fuck up” and do as we are told, support the presumptive nominee, forget about his (or her) past transgressions, and by all that is holy, “Don’t let the Democrats set America back and give us the dreaded socialism!”

I doubt that my little ranting tome here gets peeped by many of the sanctimonious types who are writing these types of posts. I do have some of their sites linked on my sidebar, because I have a basic measure of respect for the quality of their writing. But these series of posts on how we should all make sure that a Republican, any Republican, wins the Presidency are really pissing me the fuck off.

These people clearly have an agenda. And it’s not just “for the good of the Party.” It’s personal.

The vast majority of these blogers makes a modest income by advertising. Their blogs are littered with pointless ads targeted at conservative minded folks who may click on some bullshit with Newt or Ann Coulter in an ad.

I am very aware that many of these bloggers are political insiders. They probably are hired to do work for some Republican think tank, candidate, or governmental office. If they don’t work directly for campaign many are active with political action groups with agendas.

Blogging has evolved into an entertainment medium and some of these same people have enjoyed such a successful readership that they have now expanded into of all things, like “radio talks shows.” They love it.
It helps to create the illusion of influence. Their influence. And that means money in their pockets.

How else do you explain the fact that many of these bloggers have inside tracks on conferences with political leaders or personal meetings with the folks in Washington in the know? You don’t write the kind of bullshit many of these bloggers do if there were not some incentive to do so. Particularly when it comes to steering people to particular political candidates.

jello.jpgUnfortunately bloggers, many who have been granted some measure “status,”have now started to tell their audiences what to think and how to think.
Now don’t get my angst twisted, I’m all for folks pimping themselves for a few bucks and a few accolades, that tis the American way.
My office wall is full of folks with whom I have a basic measure of respect for because of what they have been able to achieve, but many are also those with who I have some serious political and philosophical differences with.

I have never written a post, nor will I ever, seeking to convince anybody as to what they should think or do. I express my opinions. And you can take them. Or leave them. I don’t care which!

The great thing about reading so many blogs is that I am not alone in my angst and anger at what I am seeing from the Republican establishment.
I am not alone when I write about my disdain at my choices for President of the United States.

However one thing I learned is that the quality of my life will never be dictated by who sits in the oval office. This country is too great for one person to completely wack it up in 4 years.

I am also aware that by me not voting, or should I say me choosing not to select from any of the current crop of sellout losers, that I am indeed making a choice.

I am aware that not all candidates may meet all my criteria, but there are some basic political character issues that must be exhibited by a candidate in order for them to win my trust. And my vote.

I voted for George Bush twice because, although frankly I was never impressed by him overall, I never doubted that he would NOT cave into liberal special interests. He could be counted upon to be firm and resolute on some core GOP issues. As his presidency is coming to an end that gut feeling has basically been proved true. Yes G Dub has issues, but the facts that liberals hate him so much means that he did exactly what I voted for his to do, stand and fight against Democrat tards. He took a firm stand on some key issues and put conservatives on the court.  He did what we conservatives counted upon him to do.

I don’t trust any of these current crop of Republicans to do that.
McCain is a politically appeasing fraud. Romney is a puppet candidate with absolutely no political soul. Huckabee is a joke with a cross.
Giuliani? Please; if there was no 9/11 we would not be talking about him. And what the fuck Ron Paul is confusing at best.

Let me address some specifics I found is some posts:


the people doing the most “enduring” would be our troops and their families, both of whom have sacrificed so much for a goal that is achieveable if only we are able to set aside our differences with whoever the Republican nominee is in order to make sure what we set out in Iraq to do from the get go has a chance at succeeding.

Let me be clear, Hillary if she becomes our leader, will not pull out of Iraq. Any notion that things will significantly change in Iraq because a Democrat is elected is ridiculous. Mark my words.

Medved chimes in:


From a conservative perspective, it’s easy to come up with, say, twenty-five issues areas in which McCain would be preferable to Barack/Clinton. How about the war on terror, taxes, socialized medicine, school choice, cutting government, gays in the military, tort reform, curbing abortion, second amendment rights, nuclear power, pork barrel spending, support for Israel, confronting Iran, affirmative action, appointing strict constructionist judges, and many, many more.

And this dude

. . . . Apparently, these anticipated conservative non-voters are annoyed with Republican imperfection. They are disheartened, disappointed, disillusioned, distempered, dismal — and thus plan to dis the party that better advances conservative principles in government.
They appear to have fallen victim to the false syllogism: 1) Something must be done; 2) not voting is something; therefore, 3) I will not vote.

Of course the fallacy of the syllogism is that the second category could be anything. For example, number two could as well read “eating dog excrement is something.” I rather suspect that they will feel about the same afterward, whether they chose the non-voting option or the scatological one. They are both equally illogical — and repulsive –
and would deserve the moniker, “Stupid.”


************
More

I refuse to let the desire for perfection be the enemy of good. No
candidate is going to give me all I want. I can find good in some of
them. I’d even hold my nose and vote for McCain if it came to that,
because I’d at least have done my
part to keep a hard core leftist like Hillary, Obama or Edwards from beating a so-so conservative and influencing my life for the next 4 years (minimum and that isn’t counting Supreme Court nominations). And in the case of McCain, he’s been steadfast for victory in Iraq which is of paramount importance to me. But he cannot be counted upon to stay the course when it comes to key conservative values. He’s shown much too often that he can “compromise” on almost anything (read sell out)
when it helps him keep or attain more power.I understand frustration. I’m frustrated as well. We can’t let frustration make us irrational?

Call me, Snoop irrational? Because I decide to make the conscious choice to stand on my principals and not reward the GOP for continuing to cave in to liberal interests and ill fated logic, I’m irrational? Fuck that!

Many of these bloggers posting this bullshit stood by and did not do or say shit when Republicans like McCain boldly thumb the GOP in the eye assuming that during his quest for the presidency we would all just lie down and kiss his old tired ass because our fear of a Democrat occupying the White House would be enough to grant him what was rightly his.

In addition this blogger criticism of people like me, and all the shots at Rush are also bullshit. I have far more respect for Rush now that I ever had because his refuses to compromise his conservative principals for political convenience.
I sincerely hope he chooses not to endorse a single tard Republican candidate, because none of them frankly have earned it. I doubt that the majority of his listening audience thinks that any of these frauds deserve his endorsement.

I said before and I will say it again: all of my life I have considered myself proud to be Republican. However, I must say the good thing about this election cycle is that I realized how silly and bogus it was for me to put on the figurative GOP uniform. It doesn’t mean what I thought it meant. Not any longer.

It is not enough for someone to simply proclaim themselves a Republican.
I want substance in any candidate I choose to vote for. I must believe that, although I may not agree with a given candidate on all issues, I must believe that a candidate is willing to stand on and uphold the basic principals that I hold dear.

Washington is full of conniving shady shyster rednecks on both sides of the political aisle. Most, particularly those on the Republican side are more afraid of losing their lofty status on the hill and are more willing to kiss the ass of Democrats to stay in power than fight against liberal Democrat ideals that certainly will steer this country in the wrong direction.

I don’t give a shit what you detractors say, there is no fundamental difference in voting for any of the current crop of Republicans than there is voting for Hillary or Obama.

If you people are so damm concerned that this nation will slip further left than you should have spoken out and voiced your concerns to the GOP and your particular political representatives and figuratively fired a shot over the bow and sent a message to the likes of John McCain that he is not the type of Republican we want representing the party.

Goddamm McCain should not even be among the choices anyway!

The fact that McCain is what we are left with is embarrassing. This silly old bastard is perfectly willing to compromise and kiss Democrat ass simply to cement his “legacy”, just like Hillary.
You would think that because the GOP party coffers locally (in my state of Kansas, the GOP is flat BROKE) and nationally are empty because folks like myself won’t donate and support these punk ass frauds would have gotten the message.
Democrats are rolling in the money because their national push to the left is working, and the base is vigilant and has made the Republicans open their collective legs are allowing themselves to be fucked by the Democrats like a two dollar an hour tramp.

You fucken people either have short memories, or you really don’t give a fuck, or you are on the payroll. We are not under any obligation to support this punk ass fake ass Republicans.

Before 2012 those of you who consider yourselves conservatives better speak up and be more vocal about the direction of the party or else there may be a long time before another Republican occupies the White House.

Aiming your attacks on those of us who choose to stand on principal is frankly stupid and misguided. When I find a Republican candidate who represents my core values - not just in words but in deeds - then and only then will he or she get my vote, otherwise they can go fuck themselves.

Sphere: Related Content

John McCain loves Hillary!

Tuesday, February 5th, 2008

mccain4.jpg

 Video Via The Jawa ReportBurning Hot, Moonbattery

Sphere: Related Content

Clinton Suggests Tapping Wages

Monday, February 4th, 2008


hillary_poster_needs.gif

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.

The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC’s “This Week,” she said: “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”

Sphere: Related Content

Race-hustler Maxine Waters endorses Hillary

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008


waters.JPG


From Michelle Malkin

Today’s birds of a feather entry: Race-hustler Maxine Waters is set to endorse Hillary Clinton in a conference call today. Maybe Hill will put a little Selma-style flavor in her voice today to celebrate. I came to know and loathe Waters when I lived and worked in Los Angeles. Here’s the column I wrote about Democrat pandering to Waters in August 2000. It still stands today:The Party of Maxine WatersShe is one of the most self-serving, hate-filled, race-obsessed politicians in America. The Democratic Party doesn’t just embrace her. It kneels at her feet.

Los Angeles Congresswoman Maxine Waters reigned supreme this week when Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman appeared before a black audience to “explain” himself. The Connecticut senator’s sins? Opposing affirmative action and supporting educational vouchers that benefit minority children. Lieberman, once a courageous voice for equal opportunity, has now been schooled: Pander hard and keep your dissenting thoughts to yourself.

After throwing a hissy-fit in the press because she had not been personally consulted about Al Gore’s veep picks (”I never had the opportunity to talk to anybody about it before he was decided on as the vice presidential choice,” she whined), Waters gave her benediction.

The skilled publicity hound dissed and then kissed Lieberman for the cameras; a cheek-to-cheek photo of the couple appeared in newspapers across the country.

Read the rest

Sphere: Related Content

The top liberal fishwrap, the New York Times likes McCain!

Friday, January 25th, 2008

mccain22.jpgThe New York Times backs McCain

We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for president. The leading candidates have no plan for getting American troops out of Iraq. They are too wedded to discredited economic theories and unwilling even now to break with the legacy of President Bush. We disagree with them strongly on what makes a good Supreme Court justice.Still, there is a choice to be made, and it is an easy one. Senator John McCain of Arizona is the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing from and on behalf of a small, angry fringe. With a record of working across the aisle to develop sound bipartisan legislation, he would offer a choice to a broader range of Americans than the rest of the Republican field.

We have shuddered at Mr. McCain’s occasional, tactical pander to the right because he has demonstrated that he has the character to stand on principle. He was an early advocate for battling global warming and risked his presidential bid to uphold fundamental American values in the immigration debate. A genuine war hero among Republicans who proclaim their zeal to be commander in chief, Mr. McCain argues passionately that a country’s treatment of prisoners in the worst of times says a great deal about its character.

Read the rest, but why bother. If the New York Times backs the dude, that should send HUGE red flags to any “republican” considering voting for him.

Sphere: Related Content

McCain’s the real flip-flopper

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

mccain1.jpgThis from Paul Campos - The Rocky Mountain News

One of the curiosities of American politics is the media’s ongoing infatuation with John McCain. A bit of this is based on things such as McCain’s opposition to torture (unfortunately we can no longer treat opposing torture like opposing child molestation, i.e., something one assumes is standard equipment in a presidential candidate rather than a luxury upgrade). Yet most of the journalistic love affair with McCain is based on other factors.Consider this typical endorsement from The Orlando Sentinel: While McCain “has stuck to his principles at the risk of sinking his campaign,” Mitt Romney “has abandoned positions that would have alienated his party’s conservative base.” (Indeed I checked a computer database and discovered that, in the national media, Romney is at least six times more likely to be described as a flip-flopper than McCain).

This does not merely ignore but actually inverts the truth. The fact is that no presidential candidate in either party has flip-flopped as egregiously as McCain on such a wide range of issues. Here’s just a small sample of Sen. Straight Talk’s recent series of remarkable conversions to politically convenient stances:

* On abortion rights, McCain has done a 180-degree turn, from favoring only the most minor restrictions and opposing the overturning of Roe v. Wade, to supporting an almost total ban, while advocating that the Supreme Court reverse Roe immediately.

* McCain has transformed himself from a deficit hawk who mocked supply-side economics, into someone who sounds like he’s drunk deeply from the wackiest vats of supply-side Kool-Aid, to the point where he now claims raising taxes decreases revenues (a claim so wildly in conflict with the facts - for example federal tax revenues almost doubled in real terms after the Clinton tax increases - that it’s either a shameless lie or a product of astounding ignorance).

* In regard to ethanol subsidies, McCain has gone from treating them as the worst sort of pork, to becoming a strong supporter of a program despised by economists, but beloved of Iowa farmers and the good people at Archer Daniels Midland.

* Six years ago McCain sternly condemned Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance.” Eighteen months ago he gave the commencement address at Falwell’s university, while openly embracing one of the most noxious figures of the religious right.

These are just a few examples from a far longer list. On topics ranging from immigration, to campaign finance reform, to gay marriage, to accepting support from various sleazy characters he previously shunned, McCain has either completely reversed his views, or seriously equivocated regarding what they are this week.

Yet the media continue to lavish him with worshipful paeans to his supposedly uncompromising commitment to principled leadership no matter what the political cost etc., etc.

Part of this is accounted for by lazy autopilot journalism, which stops people from bothering to check whether the story line they’ve repeated for years still has any relationship to reality.

But part of it is something worse. When it comes to McCain, many of the sophisticates at the top of the media pyramid are like a masochistic spouse who treats open infidelity as a twisted sort of faithfulness. They love McCain because when he lies to their face he doesn’t even pretend to be doing otherwise. According to the pretzel logic of a certain kind of journalism, that counts as candor.

All this would be merely amusing if McCain were not a genuinely tragic figure. The young man who showed such exemplary courage in the face of his North Vietnamese tormenters has become an old man whose courage abandoned him when subjected to the more subtle tortures of worldly ambition.

Sphere: Related Content

Recession, Ron Paul fans, Drama Queen Conservatives, still not voting for McCain

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008


The only political candidate worthy of my vote!

simpsonalien.jpg
From Sweetness & Light 

War News Good? Let’s Create A Recession - A search for the term “recession” in the pages of the New York Times turns up 210 results just in the past 30 days

***********

Ron Paul Nutbars Crow About Nevada - From Brainsters Blog

You know you’re pathetic when you point to a state where you got 14% of the vote in a state caucus where you ran the only TV ads. An LA Times blogger enthuses:

Boy, oh, boy! Hidden behind all the hoopla, headlines and the Nevada caucus victories of Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton is one little-noticed but stunning political development and number:Ron Paul, the one-time Libertarian candidate and 10-term Republican congressman from Texas, was in second place. That’s right, Second Place. The 72-year-old ob-gyn who’s always on the end of the line at GOP debates or barred altogether, was running ahead of John McCain, Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, in fact, ahead of….all other Republicans except Romney, who easily captured his second state in a week after Michigan.

Woooooot! The Ron Paul Love Revolution is surging!

************

Also from Brainster - Drama Queen Conservative Bloggers

Add Jeff Goldstein to the list: I will not, will not, vote for John McCain.Oh, and he won’t vote for Mike Huckabee, either, and would have to hold his nose to vote for Mitt Romney. If Fred doesn’t win the nomination then Jeff’s going to sit this one out. LOL! Funniest thing Goldstein’s ever written.One of John Hawkins’ weekend guests does a little DQ herself:Jeff captures my ennui perfectly. And this reminds me of what I’ve written before: bloggers are a different breed than the average American. The air we breath on the conservative side is as rarefied as the air breathed in newsrooms around America.No, it’s as rarefied as the air breathed in the liberal blogosphere. And I mean that seriously. The idiot lib-bloggers spent all of 2006 trying to beat a Democrat because he was an apostate on one issue. The conservative bloggers look like they’re going to be spending all of 2008 trying to beat a Republican because he was an apostate on one issue.And don’t try to convince me it’s more than that one issue. McCain-Feingold? Tell me that you’re seriously going to sit out an election because of campaign finance laws. Torture (which Goldstein mentions)? Hey, I disagree with the senator on that issue, but guess what? He actually knows what torture is like, unlike Jeff or me.

You know, everybody on the conservative side of the aisle got a big laugh out of the gag that Hillary’s new theme song was, “It’s My Party, and I’ll Cry If I Want To”, and now what happens? Less than two weeks later, they’re singing it too!

*****************
Oh what the hell, so I’m a drama Queen Conservative Blogger, I’m still not voting for McCain. John McCain can kiss my black ass and any blogger who is supporting him who wants to write this trifling bullshit chastising me for my political decision making can also kiss my black ass.

I said before and I will keep saying, the Democrats can have the fucken White House; I don’t give a shit anymore.
McCain all of these years has been comfortable with kissing the collective asses of Democrats and he is frankly more comfortable with them than he is with his right leaning homies.

The more posts like this I read from McCain pimps just makes me laugh.
Fucken people on these radio talks shows getting on the air and sounding off about these sorry ass candidates, it’s not only irritating it is downright embarrassing.
The political contenders in this election cycles, candidates on both sides of the political aisle are all idiots. I must admit that I frankly feel like a complete jackass for falling for Freds faux candidacy. It was clear that he did not want the gig, I knew this from the beginning but I was searching for something, anything to latch on to. I was a fool, particularly since I posted my support here.
That won’t happen again.

Nobody can convince me that any of these people are worthy of my vote, they all suck; America has successfully fucked the presidential selection process. I seriously doubt that we will ever have a candidate who is truly worthy of the position.
Anyone worthy of the position is too smart to run.
We will be forever left with sinister, lying ass, soulless, pandering slugs who are not even deserving of being mayor of Mayberry much less the most powerful position on the planet.
All these candidates need to do is bullshit (lie to) enough dolts, speak somewhat eloquently blurt out a few crap phrases and magically you have a candidate.

John McCain supporters keep bringing up his time in the Hanoi Hilton, like being a POW automatically shoots you to the front of the presidential line.
POW or not, if your political ideology is full of holes, then you won’t get my vote.
If that draws the ire of you McCain supporters then screw you.

Sphere: Related Content

Mark Levin On The John McCain Candidacy

Monday, January 21st, 2008


mccain6.gif

By Mark R. Levin - From via National Review: Found on Sweetness & Light

As I understand Victor Davis Hanson’s position, those of us who believe John McCain will cause severe damage to the conservative movement and the Republican party should hush up, or at least calm down, for this electoral juggernaut, who has managed to get 33 percent of the vote in South Carolina (despite backing by most of the establishment there) and is strong on the war in Iraq. And if we continue to bring attention to those issues that concern us — which are not insignificant to anyone who has worked in conservative circles for nearly 40 years — then we will destroy the party and Hillary Clinton will win, thereby losing the war on terror. VDH is neither the first nor will he be the last to make this case.

With all due respect, this is absurd on many levels. If John McCain is nominated and loses, it is because he doesn’t appeal to enough Americans, including the base that he has repeatedly betrayed (as Thomas Sowell puts it) over a long period of time. The suggestion that McCain and McCain alone is capable of fighting this war, given his experience, seems to be the core of the concern. Let me suggest that VDH and others who make this claim are wrong.

McCain never treated Bill Cohen, Clinton’s defense secretary, with the kind of personal animus he showed Donald Rumsfeld. McCain often confuses policy with personality affronts. He was social friends with Cohen so he didn’t admonish him about his hollowing out of the military. His attacks on Rumsfeld started before his disagreement over the surge. Their personalities clashed. And as before, McCain wanted to get even. The fact that he was right on the surge, which has now evolved into mythical proportions with the help of his campaign and supporters, goes high on the credit side of the ledger.

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content