VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘Ron Paul’ Category

Ron Paul Retracts Endorsement Of Racist Nut

Thursday, May 8th, 2008


ronpaul08a.jpg

Found this on Wonkette

The glorious Paultard Freedom Train rolls on, but without Bill Johnson, a racist nut who is running for Superior Court judge in Los Angeles. Johnson wrote the (as yet unratified) “Pace Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution, which would’ve limited American citizenship to white people and octoroons. Ron Paul’s people say “Whoopsy, didn’t notice that,” and have now un-endorsed Johnson. More »

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul Supporters For John McCain? WTF!!

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008


bullshit-bag.jpg

Found this on Wired

Texas congressman Ron Paul is still officially in the presidential race, despite Arizona Republican John McCain winning enough delegates to become the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.But with Paul’s long shot bid for the White House now a no-shot bid, a few of Paul’s supporters appear to have started a new web project called Join, or Die 08. They’re rallying behind McCain.

Given many of Paul supporters’ staunch and vocal opposition to the war in Iraq, and some supporters’ rocky relationship with much of the of the Republican party, this call for unity to support McCain is surprising.   

The group’s site uses Benjamin Franklin’s famous cartoon to rally support around McCain, and has posted its first YouTube video:

I may not be the brightest bulb on the Jesus tree, but I do know that this is a bunch of bullshit. TRUE Ron Paul fans would never support John McCain. Unless they say to themselves fuck it, a closet liberal like John McCain is better than a communist big gubment freak like Obama.

Sphere: Related Content

Free At Last (Ron Paul, MLK) - More white political candidates pimping a dead black icon

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

Tasteless and disgraceful Ron Paul Ad

My self imposed moratorium on Ron Paul post has come to an abrupt halt.
While searching for another video I came across this piece of shit Ron Paul promotional piece as he does what so many other fake ass white people do, praise a dead black icon for political gain.
This is why frankly I wish there were no longer MLK holidays, because every damm year and it irritates the shit out of me, I have to hear white people heap this fake ass praise on King and talk about how great he was knowing damm well that back when black folks were being fire hosed, and attacked by dogs and being harassed by segregationist pimps the majority of these white folks did not give a shit about what King was doing.
As far as I’m concerned this is as distasteful as the white kids throwing the MLK black stereotype parties, promoting a Ron Paul fundraising on of all days MLK day.
Fucken racist fraud fuck, by all means keep throwing your damm paychecks into this dudes pocket, he is not going to fucken become president, so you people will simply become broke ass white trash!

I don’t want to hear shit else about this fraud retard!!

Sphere: Related Content

Black and White Lies: Ron Paul and Martin Luther King

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

Mr. Dance sent me a comment where he disputed the claim in an earlier post I had that Ron Paul did not vote for the MLK holiday.
Melvin if your out there, I said I was not going to post Ron Paul stuff so I’m only posting this to be “fair.”

mlkingphoto75.jpgBy George Dance from The Daily Paul

The attempt to discredit Ron Paul as a racist, anti-semite, and homophobe has had some success. It’s received some MSM coverage, and undoubtedly planted a bug in some voters’ minds. But it looks as though it failed to accomplish its major task: to drive away the campaign’s grassroots support.In the politically correct world of the Paulophobes, the mere accusation of the above three sins is the kiss of death; and many did expect the Ron Paul RevolUTION to immediately die. Some supporters (mainly, it seems, Beltway Libertarians) have been duly shocked and appalled, and withdrawn their sanction in good Ayn Rand style. But many others have risen to defend Dr. Paul - so many that bloggers carrying the story are complaining about being mobbed.

Briefly, for anyone who’s been on Mars this week, that story is: On the day of the New Hampshire primary, Jamie Kirchik of /The New Republic/ printed a story recycling the allegations of racist etc. comments in the early-1990’s /Ron Paul Survival Report/. Paul responded that he was not the author, repudiated them all, and expressed his commitment to individualism, to judging people on their own characters rather than collective attributes like race. Which seems to have satisfied those in the MSM who know him, and have first-hand knowledge of his integrity.

Hence those pushing the story have changed tactics. In the past few days, they’ve begun telling the world that Ron Paul is not only a racist, but a blatant liar to boot. Which is a far more vicious meme, which can do much more damage.

For the one thing that unites all polyglot elements of the RevolUTION - anti-war, pro-life, pro-sovereignty, fiscal conservative, hard money, constitutionalist, libertarian, et al - is trust in Ron Paul’s integrity. Those who’ve known, and known of, Dr. Paul for years know of his integrity: He says what he believes, no matter who finds it offensive (like his opposition to the Iraq war) or nutty (like his opposition to the Civil War). He does not flip-flop, he does not pander, and most importantly, he does not lie.

That’s how his supporters see him; and those who see that will follow him anywhere. The only way to make his supporters desert him would be to shatter that image of integrity. Hence the new campaign to portray him as a liar and dissembler, hiding his real agenda from us all.

The claim is that Dr. Paul is lying when he says he did not write all of his newsletter; in particular that he did not write the passages TNR calls racist, homophobic, etc. Prove that claim and, they hope, the RevolUTION dies.

I know that works for me. I don’t care who Ron Paul really hates, so long as his commitment is to liberty; that alone would prevent him from doing harm to them. But convince me that he’s a liar, and therefore maybe not committed to liberty - and I’m outta here.

How to destroy Ron Paul’s reputation for integrity? How to make him appear to be a liar and a hypocrite? Well, let;s see: here are all these Ron Paul newsletters, with articles he says he didn’t write. What if Ron Paul did write those articles? Then he’d be not only a liar, but (in his public statments about racism) a hypocrite; and it’s goodbye integrity. So that’s the new direction of the anti-Paul campaign.

I first noticed that last week when (googling as usual for news of everything Paul) I came upon this brief screed at the notorious Little Green Footballs blog:

“In response to the New Republic article on the “Ron Paul Political Report,” Ron Paul stated that he did not write the newsletter and was unaware of the content.
“But in this December 1990 issue of the newsletter, which labels Martin Luther King a child molester, there’s some pretty good evidence that Dr. Paul himself wrote at least this entry:
[.pdf]
“Ron Paul’s wife is named Carol, and in 1990 he did have grandchildren.”
http://littlegreenfootbal…

Well, OK. But that’s not exactly a scoop. Carol Paul’s name is well known, and all America got to see the Paul progeny sing “Deck the Halls.” Presumably anyone working for Ron Paul & Associates would know those facts as well; so that’s really no evidence that Paul wrote even that little squib.

On Jan. 10, LGF reported further revelations:

“ The January 1991 newsletter features the author mentioning another congressman as “my successor” and talking about his experience as “a flight surgeon in the air force” and then afterward launching into another tirade about Martin Luther King. Again this is Ron Paul’s record, not someone else. The author is clearly Ron Paul.
“ In that same newsletter the author writes about his time running for President in 1988 on the Libertarian Party ticket. Ron Paul ran for President in 1988 on the Libertarian Party ticket. Here it is completely unambiguous that the author is Ron Paul and that he is expressing his own views about Martin Luther King.
“ In Feb of 1991 the author writes that he voted against “an expensive federal holiday for this man” referring to King. Of course Ron Paul famously voted against recognizing MLK day as a holiday.”
http://www.littlegreenfoo…

Well, now, this is the proverbial death by 1000 cuts. With each of these claims, Ron Paul is meant to look more and more like a liar and a hypocrite. And they must be true; look, they’re even cited.
Of course, when I went to the cited source, http://sultanknish.com, I found only the same words uncited; but never mind that … the same objection applies. Any ghostwriter would be expected to know about Dr. Paul’s service and congressional records, his first presidential campaign, his voting record …

No, not his voting record; I know all the rest, but I didn’t know that. And it’s an easily checked fact; just google “Ron Paul” “Martin Luther King”.

Which brought me to the Politifact website. Politifact is a project of the St. Petersburg Times, which debunks politicians’ campaign claims. In no way can it be called a Ron Paul site. In this case it was picking nits with Ron Paul’s claim that he votes only for “legislation expressly authorized by the Constitution.” Says the site:

“An examination of Paul’s record shows that although he usually adheres to his principle, he has sometimes voted for programs that aren’t “expressly authorized” in the Constitution.
“For example, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, he voted to authorize the continuing operation of NASA and to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday on the third Monday in January.”
http://www.politifact.com…

Hold on, there. According to LGS, “Ron Paul famously voted against recognizing MLK day as a holiday.” But according to Politifact, Ron Paul “voted to authorize the continuing operation of NASA and to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday on the third Monday in January.”

Bear in mind that the above was not written by a “Paultard”, but by a reporter who actually investigated Dr. Paul’s voting record. Unless that reporter somehow made a mistake, or lied, then LGF made a mistake (in trusting sultanknish.com) and sultanknish.com either made a mistake or lied. In any case, neither one can be trusted as a source of information in the future.

The fisticuffs between Ron Paul and his critics can only be judged by each individual personally, on the basis of whom that individual trusts. For this individual, this round goes to Dr. Paul.

- George Dance
——————

PS - I posted this information to both LGF and Sultanknish.com. It looks like the first didn’t print my reply. The second site, to its credit, did post my first reply. That in turn drew a response from the Sultan itself, which is so incredible that I’ll quote it in full:

/quote/

actually i also noted that the author was a flight surgeon and ran for president in 88 on the libertarian ticket

now it could all just be somebody impersonating Ron Paul but that brings us into the realm of conspiracy theories and if Ron Paul wants to claim that, he’s going to have to prove it

as to your claim about Ron Paul voting for MLK Day, that’s a blatant lie

http://ronpaulsurvivalrep…

/q/

That link didn’t work, but I’ll try to repair it. I’m also writing Politifact, to let them know that sultanknish.com calls their claim a “blatant lie” - I’ll post that response if I get one.

More: Vicious Ron Paul Hit Piece Scrapes The Barrel Of Yellow Journalism
Kirchick claims Congressman thinks Martin Luther King a “gay pedophile” amongst other ludicrous smears


Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.

Ron Paul - Link

Sphere: Related Content

More Ron Paul, response Melvin…

Friday, January 11th, 2008

From Melvin:

All that may be true. (he’s talking about the post below: More Ron Paul kicking, “if he’s lying he’s a closet racist and if he’s telling the truth he’s disturbingly incompetent”)He is still the ONLY candidate who is truly embracing the arguments of our founding fathers.

It’s a shame your obsession with race is distracting from what should be a valid topic of conversation.

The RINO Republicans sneer and make jokes like the cool kids picking on the class geek in high school. You obsess about some old comments you find offensive.

Meanwhile the Republicans go down the crapper and we live in an increasingly racist bankrupt socialist state. Yay.


*****
Melvin, you’re a good man and a sincere one, but you have stated that I am obsessed about race more times than I can count.
Yes I’m a Negro, a proud one, and I have this blog to express my rants and opinions that without blogging I would be ranting to Mrs. Snoop and even she would get tired of it. Love you Boo!

However, I post Ron Paul content that I find, other than my rants nothing is original, I post what interests me. There are few black conservative dudes out there, still fewer on TV, radio or elsewhere. If you were to tune into a black radio station you would find an even more obsessive “I am black hear me roar” tone that the vast majority of white people might find annoying.

There is much about black folks that white folks find offensive, odd, unusual, annoying whatever. From the way some of us dress, to how some pronounce ax instead of ask, to the consuming of pickled pigs feet and Collard Greens.
The bass line in music annoys the shit out of you white folks so does the saggy pants and do-rags.

Me, yours truly Snoop is none of that, outside my eating of collards and my love of cornbread, and yes I still love to groove with some hip hop and rap, I’m not your typical Negro maybe except for my large afro I sport these days.
As annoying as it may be, I focus on race shit because it is relevant, but me being obsessed about it, not at all.
All of these links to Ron Paul and these newsletters are from WHITE BLOGGERS. Not a single black blogger or black website is talking about Ron Paul, because they don’t give a shit. Reporting on the latest rapper scandal or ghetto fashion trend Ron Paul is hardly on the radar of black folks.

So then why Snoop do you keep bringing up and posting this racist newsletter shit? 1) Ron Paul is running for President of the United States 2) he has raised over $20 million for his campaign and 3) He flatly denies that he ever had anything to do with the content, which is a bold face lie, which goes to his true character and mindset.

You Ron Paul fans can talk all you want about this Constitution crap all day and how he is this champion. If Ron Paul was such a guru for the Constitution then why did he not have libraries of material on the web and resource networks touting his positions long before this particular campaign? He ran for president TWENTY YEARS AGO! And he sounds as confused, boneheaded and wacky as he did on the Morton Downey Jr. show back in the day.

Twenty years of polishing and refining and articulating his views for the masses obviously did not work. He has repeated these tired constitutional and conspiracy theory rants so much he does not even bother to listen to others in a debate. (see video below).

Ron Paul fans are getting crucified and rightfully so because you folks refuse to get that before you can go back to constitutional principals or bring back fiscal responsibility to Washington or lead this nation in peace talks or diplomacy around the world, even before you start uttering campaign rhetoric people need to have an innate sense that their particular candidate of choice is a “leader.” Someone who without saying a word represents someone you would go into battle with, who will stand tall, speak with conviction and do so with confidence and swagger. Someone who will give you a firm handshake, look you in the eye, someone who walks into a room and attention is immediately drawn to them. That sure as hell is not Ron Paul, hell I would take a bitchy Hillary going into battle than Paul.
That seems cold, and you would be right, but most of the problem is with Paul supporters, they are the ones trying to create this fictitious imagery.

From fixing internet polls, to spamming websites, to sending hate mail to anyone who does not like nor promote Paul, his affiliation to racist sites and being photographed with these people.

But Melvin let me get to the bottom line. I posted something about Ron Paul some time ago and I was sent the text of the initial racist newsletter from a Ron Paul fan in an attempt to I guess try to bitch slap me, saying that us black folks were a bunch of drug dealing, fast running thugs and was sent e-mails with some of that content.
Later I was sent e-mails and some comments from people pretending to be black (with your ridiculously stereotypical sounding black names) saying how they supported Mr. Paul.
Also I read, in particular Stormfront and Vangard and I read what these Ron Paul supporters have to say and no Melvin, these folks don’t like black people.

So Melvin before the next time you accuse me of being obsessed with race and ignoring the much more important constitutional issues that should be addressed, don’t address them with me go to these fucken Ron Paul sites and chastise them for their ridiculous and outrageous behavior.

I said from day one that Ron Paul has ZERO chance of being the Republican nominee, but his main problem has been and will always be his retarded supporters who are from everything I read far more obsessed with race and hating Jews and Israel that I.
Ron Paul’s fans have turned him into a laughing stock on the campaign trail and in the blog world and no amount of constitutional blather coming from his mouth will ever fix that.
***
Ron Paul from last nights debate, via Michelle Malkin

Sphere: Related Content

More Ron Paul kicking, “if he’s lying he’s a closet racist and if he’s telling the truth he’s disturbingly incompetent”

Thursday, January 10th, 2008
Ron Paul “I dont know nothing about no skinkin’ newsletters!” needs to explain clearly about those years of racist, conspiracy-mongering newsletters that went out under his name, with many personal details in the articles that strongly suggest Paul was the author.Sultan Knish has this: Proof: Ron Paul Lied About Not Being the Author of the Newsletters

The January 1991 newsletter features the author mentioning another congressman as “my successor” and talking about his experience as “a flight surgeon in the air force” and then afterward launching into another tirade about Martin Luther King. Again this is Ron Paul’s record, not someone else. The author is clearly Ron Paul.In that same newsletter the author writes about his time running for President in 1988 on the Libertarian Party ticket. Ron Paul ran for President in 1988 on the Libertarian Party ticket. Here it is completely unambiguous that the author is Ron Paul and that he is expressing his own views about Martin Luther King.

In Feb of 1991 the author writes that he voted against “an expensive federal holiday for this man” referring to King. Of course Ron Paul famously voted against recognizing MLK day as a holiday.

Bryan at Hot Air jumps in Paul’s shit…

If his spin is true, then take it for what it is: Ron Paul is so incompetent that he’s not only not fit to run the executive branch or a Dairy Queen, he’s not even fit to write a check. That is what he was doing all those years, writing checks to people who were publishing nonsense in his name, people he can’t identify now who he now claims were writing things that he didn’t even believe. But he was such a hands-off guy that he never bothered to take an editorial look at what they were writing, across a decade. Talk about an easy boss.
On the other hand, if his spin is not true, then he’s lying now and he really did believe all that back when it was published and may still believe it. And if he’s lying, he’s not quite the principled patriot that his fans believe he is.

This comment sums it up for me: “if he’s lying he’s a closet racist and if he’s telling the truth he’s disturbingly incompetent”

DITTO

Sphere: Related Content

Attack Of The Paulies

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

Press Releases › Ron Paul Statement on The New Republic Article Regarding Old Newsletters

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008
(From Hot Air) Here’s Kirchick’s interview with Tucker Carlson, who has been supporting Paul and traveling with him. Note Carlson’s reluctance to believe that this garbage came from Paul even though it was printed by Paul under his name. Tucker will probably come around in a day or two, but will most of Paul’s supporters? Not without some ugliness, imho.



ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA - LINK – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:

“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person’s character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’

“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It’s once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”

###

Sphere: Related Content

The Problem with Paul

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

ronpaul2a.jpgThis is from Hot Air and they deal with the Ron Paul newsletter revelation. Frankly much of this y’all already know, I just continue to get a kick out of posting Ron Paul stuff, but I am shocked that most of the Ron Paul fans have been dead silent on this. Not even the conspiracy theory crap I usually read from them.
***********

Paul’s defense of these newsletters has EVOLved over time, from the offending lines having been “taken out of context” to having been ghost-written by some unknown, not to him but to us, figure. Eric Dondero, who was Paul’s employee for years, says the ghost writer was Lew Rockwell. That’s very plausible; Paul and Rockwell are ideologically similar. Rockwell’s site is one of many online bastions for defenses of All Things Paul.But here’s the thing about all of this. To borrow Paul’s spin on the 1993 WTC bombing, it actually does matter little if Paul wrote the crazy himself or had it ghostwritten under his own name. There’s a pattern developing with the Paul campaign that’s become too obvious to ignore. We have a pile of newsletters containing the more than occasional crazy. We have Paul being photographed with members of Stormfront, from whom he accepts donations. And we have Paul supporters celebrating terrorist Guy Fawkes on their big Ron Paul fundraiser day. And we have a mob of Paul supporters harassing Sean Hannity with obscenities. And despite the fact that Paul says he’s not a Truther, he has undeniably courted the Truther vote by hanging out with uber Truther Alex Jones.

Anything in the above paragraph, seen in isolation, is disturbing. But taken all together, it’s clarifying. Ron Paul isn’t just a “small government, constitutionalist libertarian.” I wish he was; that’s how he has long sold himself to the good people who have supported him all these years. But the truth is that he’s bad and many of his friends are worse. A vote for him is a vote for them. Yet Andrew Sullivan and his fellow prominent Paul supporters like NRO’s John Derbyshire remain blissfully unconcerned about it. This is serious stuff, but it hasn’t made a difference to them at all.

Read it all here

Sphere: Related Content

Angry White Man

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

ronpaul08a.jpgHey y’all already know I thought Ron Paul was a closet racist, duh, but this is good reading, except for Ron Paul fans, LOL! Sorry could not help that!

I know, I know lies… all lies!!

A sample of the article, go to link for full article

by James Kirchick
The bigoted past of Ron Paul.

Article Link - The New Republic
 

This “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism” was hardly the first time one of Paul’s publications had raised these topics. As early as December 1989, a section of his Investment Letter, titled “What To Expect for the 1990s,” predicted that “Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities” because “mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’” Two months later, a newsletter warned of “The Coming Race War,” and, in November 1990, an item advised readers, “If you live in a major city, and can leave, do so. If not, but you can have a rural retreat, for investment and refuge, buy it.” In June 1991, an entry on racial disturbances in Washington, DC’s Adams Morgan neighborhood was titled, “Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo.” “This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s,” the newsletter predicted. In an October 1992 item about urban crime, the newsletter’s author–presumably Paul–wrote, “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.” That same year, a newsletter described the aftermath of a basketball game in which “blacks poured into the streets of Chicago in celebration. How to celebrate? How else? They broke the windows of stores to loot.” The newsletter inveighed against liberals who “want to keep white America from taking action against black crime and welfare,” adding, “Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems.”Such views on race also inflected the newsletters’ commentary on foreign affairs. South Africa’s transition to multiracial democracy was portrayed as a “destruction of civilization” that was “the most tragic [to] ever occur on that continent, at least below the Sahara”; and, in March 1994, a month before Nelson Mandela was elected president, one item warned of an impending “South African Holocaust.”

Martin Luther King Jr. earned special ire from Paul’s newsletters, which attacked the civil rights leader frequently, often to justify opposition to the federal holiday named after him. (”What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!” one newsletter complained in 1990. “We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”) In the early 1990s, a newsletter attacked the “X-Rated Martin Luther King” as a “world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours,” “seduced underage girls and boys,” and “made a pass at” fellow civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy. One newsletter ridiculed black activists who wanted to rename New York City after King, suggesting that “Welfaria,” “Zooville,” “Rapetown,” “Dirtburg,” and “Lazyopolis” were better alternatives. The same year, King was described as “a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.”

While bashing King, the newsletters had kind words for the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke. In a passage titled “The Duke’s Victory,” a newsletter celebrated Duke’s 44 percent showing in the 1990 Louisiana Republican Senate primary. “Duke lost the election,” it said, “but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment.” In 1991, a newsletter asked, “Is David Duke’s new prominence, despite his losing the gubernatorial election, good for anti-big government forces?” The conclusion was that “our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom.” Duke is now returning the favor, telling me that, while he will not formally endorse any candidate, he has made information about Ron Paul available on his website.

Also check out - Ron Paul Bigotry Revolution

Sphere: Related Content

“Screw You Snoop!!”

Friday, December 28th, 2007
paul6.JPG

David Armor  ronpauldelaware.wordpress.com 

Can I take “you people” to include the overwhelming majority of military contributors? A vote for Ron Paul isn’t a vote for Ron Paul. It’s a vote against a system where not a majority, but a near-totality of politicians are bought by corporations. Say what you like about him, even call him a hypocrite if you believe that about him. But one thing he is NOT, is BOUGHT. That’s at least 60% of the reason why I support this man.

Sphere: Related Content

The Dr. Snoop Ron Paul fan therapy session of the day

Thursday, December 27th, 2007



Ok here is my obligatory Ron Paul post of the day.
God I fucken love You Tube!!Someone actually posted a clip of Ron Paul on the Morton Downey Jr show from 1988.
Funny shit, you have to watch.

Ok Ron Paul fans pay close attention.

Think for a moment, here is Ron Paul almost 20 years ago ranting about the same old bullshit he is ranting about today.
This dude, a seemingly crackpot candidate for president in 1988, is still scamming you people ranting about shit that frankly he really is not all that serious about.
Why else would he appear on the 80’s version of the Jerry Springer show?

Fast forward to his interview on Meet the Press last Sunday, you would think that a man who has been spouting off these political views for more than 20 years would have his theories and rants straight by now, but he doesn’t. His interview was reminiscent of a young confused child, giving an oral report to a grade school class.

How could an individual, who had been seemingly articulating the Libertarian point of view all these years is still incapable of articulating this point of view with any amount of clarity. Why? Because he doesn’t truly believe in them, or does not care. All of this libertarian crap he rants about is just for show, its bullshit.

Ah but let ole Snoop come clean about one thing, he is not a dufus, or a buffoon, or an idiot. This dude is shrewd, cunning, and clever.
He knows that there is no way in hell he could possible win the presidency, but he has developed this bogus libertarian persona that he know all too well that a certain percentage of rabid political junkies will buy into.
This year he has managed to turn that into a cash cow, $19 million worth, thanks to the internet and a bunch of unsuspecting astonishingly naïve people.

This video and many more that are available on You Tube shows a man who has perfected this bumbling, ranting Barney Fife political persona.
The details of his political leanings are irrelevant, it’s all about continuing to grab additional 15 minutes here and there during this presidential political cycle.

With his fundraising successes and rabid fan support he knows that although he won’t be anything more than just another congressman, he will go down in presidential political lore as this old folk hero with this new brand of political realism. When we all know it’s not all that real, and certainly not that new.

Wanna bet dude makes one or more presidential runs if he lives long enough.
Why the hell not, if you people are so eager to part with your hard earned money to support a presidential comic act I’m sure Dr. Paul will oblige you.

Sphere: Related Content

How dare those nasty blogers question the brilliance of Ron Paul?

Wednesday, December 26th, 2007

ronpaul2008.jpg

In between blogging and practicing my new NCAA 2008 and X-Box 360 I figure I will search for Ron Paul blog postings.
Since Ron Paul continues to lead my PPP presidential poll I can’t ignore him can I, so I’ll present the latest Ron Paul news and commentary to prove that I am not the only blogger who thinks dude is a total tard.

Sphere: Related Content

Paul Defends Asking for Special Projects

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

laughing1.JPG“I’ve never voted for an earmark in my life,” the Texas congressman said under questioning on NBC’s “Meet the Press” about reports that he has requested hundreds of millions of dollars for special projects in his home district.”

I put them in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back,” said Paul, who likened it to taking a tax credit. “I’m against the tax system, but I take all my tax credits. I want to get their money back for the people.”

Read the rest after you finish laughing!!

The great thing about posting Ron Paul stuff is you don’t have to write anything. Just post whatever crazy shit he happens to say and wait for someone to come to his defense.
He has surpassed Ross Perot in the loony politician category.
If it were not for the shit loads of money dude has raised I would think that Ron Paul would be some comic playing a politician, another Borat or something.

I still continue to read crazy shit like this:

(link) I have seen polls where 49% of those polled said under no circumstance would they vote for Paul. How ignorant they must be to not realize they are also saying that they are against the Constitution, against freedom, and for big government if they are against Paul.

And this:

Ron Paul Shines on Meet the Press
It was the absolutely most aggressive interview I have ever seen by Russert on “Meet the Press” He dredged up every slimy thing he could find to attack Dr. Paul. Yet, Dr. Paul was able to rebut EVERY SINGLE ONE!!!

Clearly dude did not see the Romney interview or Giuliani’s grilling.

He clearly does not want to be president; he is enamored with all the internet love he is getting, and I think he knows he can say this crazy shit and people will still send him money.
Despite raising $19 million he is still in the single digits in the polls.

No sane candidate for president would come out with shit like:

  • Admitting that he supports decriminalizing drugs at a national level.
  • That he would vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 if it were brought up again. (I’m sure this is why the Neo-Nazi crowd loves him)
  • Pointed out that he though Ronald Reagan was “a dramatic failure”
  • Abraham Lincoln should have bought the slaves and freed them instead of going to war over them.

You Ron Paul fans worry me, well not really…. I have never seen such blind loyalty for a guy that is a complete laughing stock. I swear to God, I don’t get it. This is unlike anything I have ever seen in politics.

If he were a smart, charismatic, good looking, friendly, articulate guy maybe I could see the love, but he is none of that. All he has to do is utter “Constitution” and people get a hard on. So none of you people gave a shit about the Constitution until Ron Paul made it an issue, what the fuck!?

Let’s see… “get rid of the IRS”, and do what exactly?

Sure bring all of our troops home, get rid of a shit load of gubment bureaucracy and do what? Oh he hasn’t got that far yet.

He is like so many liberals who live in fantasy land and thinks only in “theory.”
We have an entire fucken world of eggheads, who are in their little bubbles and when they get the opportunity to make their inner thoughts known, they spout theory bullshit all fucken day.

Lincoln should have brought the slaves? Hey Paul, Lincoln did not want those niggers over here in the first place, so ya think dude was gonna buy a few darkies and do what with them?

I’m as guilty as spreading this Ron Paul dreamland philosophy mess, but as a person who loves to study people, I can’t help but to be fascinated by his fans.

What will you people do when he drops out of the race? God I hope y’all will be ok.
Don’t be mad at Snoop for pointing out the obvious. I don’t play favorites; I’m an equal opportunity attacker.

However it’s clear that far more American’s think like I do, but the legions of Ron Paul fans stand poised to strike.
Did you notice that Russert did not even grill dude for the full hour?

Could it be that either Paul is not interesting enough to fill the hour or was Russert was giving him a break? You fans should be thanking Russert for not exposing him to any more embarrassment.

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul, I’m like wow… people actually takes what he says seriously…

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007



I said I was throwing in the towel on Ron Paul posting, but I had to put his remarkable dismal performance on Meet the Press because it is pure comedy.Russert: “If you eliminate the income tax do you know how much lost revenue that would be”

Ron Paul: “a lot”

Russert: “over a trillion dollars”

Paul: “that’s good”

Russert: “would you replace the income tax with anything else”

Paul: “not if I could help it”

Pure fucken genius! Sure sign me up!!



His fans Celebrate his performance, I’m like WOW!

awesome! let us see another stand up to these questions. yes, Dr. Paul gets a bit flustered, yes, he hesitates…. but.this is the first time Tim Russert has asked questions this tough to a canidate. No other has faced this tough a “grilling” on Meet The Press.
lets see romney or hillary deal with this with as much grace.
Ron Paul 2008!!!!
***
We give three times as much to Arab nations as we do Israel, Israel would be stronger if we did not have a foreign policy in which we constantly are involved with other nations. Lets take care of ourselves and not other nations, we live in the land of the free and if you want to fund other nations and groups you freely can. Lets keep it that way.
Ron Paul ‘08
***
There hasn’t been such a brokered convention for more than 60 years! This means that with no clear frontrunner, the GOP nomination is up for grabs by ANYONE! So your delegate vote will count that much more; In other words, Ron Paul can secure the GOP nomination with your vote!
G00gle: become a delegate (1st link!)
***
I have already changed to Republican for this election. I will be voting for Dr. Ron Paul.
For the first time in my life, I have sent cash money to a politician. Israel is our greatest enemy.
NO war for Israel!
***
Great job by Dr. Paul. So far I’ve watched the first 17 minutes of this Meet the Press, and Ron Paul gets a solid A in his handling of Russert’s efforts to prevent Dr. Paul from communicating the liberty message to the millions of people watching.
***
Knocked it out of the Park! Russerts lame attempt with the ear-mark Smear was shot down in flames… Ron PAul VOTED against each BILL! Its amazing to see Russert grasping at such non-issues. I guess that’s all he could “get” on Ron Paul to make him look bad! To bad it didn’t work for Russert…Russert needs to find a new job…HA HA Hee!
****
Ron Paul is just too intelligent to bring down. His arguments are sound
and his policies are consistent. He knows his ideas are too radical for
America to accept in one term. But I believe he has the exact policies we need to save this
world from uncontrolled domination(foreign and domestic).
***
I fear this interview was over too many American’s heads. I have trouble imagining he gained many supporters after this interview. Because Russert attacked him so hard, he probably made people afraid of the horrible things that Ron Paul’s ideas could mean. Just because Ron Paul’s ideas can bring controversy doesn’t mean he’s wrong though. It just means some people can’t fathom the truth about all the other politicians.
***
Ron Paul is Paul Revere updated! On his mighty steed of truth his hoofbeats are resounding through the land. The horrible ugly mirror image of ourselves that he is forcing us to look at and that we must not turn away from, is that we have become a people, a nation dependant upon huge corporations who’s primary product is selling death and destruction to the world. The military-industrial complex needs a war, any war to keep schlepping bombs and bullets.
***
Russert came to this interview with an agenda. He has treated Dr Paul as a joke from the beginning and was trying to prove himself right. He acted bored, avoided all eye contact, asked loaded questions, and quibbled over details rather than focusing on broad policy. Dr. Paul held his own, but I expected more professionalism out of Russert.
****
Call this what you will but I turned on Meet the Press in Boston at exactly 10:30 only to find that the station was having “technical difficulties”. Its funny that I probably could have left this channel running on my TV for a month and there would have been no interuptions. Funny how that happened exactly at that time….just enough time to allow for a few thousand New Hampshire primary voters to switch to another station.
***
The Neo Cons have put Israel first for far too long. It is time for a real patriot like Ron Paul to become president. With Dr. Paul as president, we would be sure to have someone who put America first, second and third. Continued welfare to an apartheid state like Israel is against US national security interests. Nelson mandella, Desmond Tutu.. people who know say Israel is an apartheid state. RP 08′
***
Ron Paul is now being attacked by the zionist controlled mass media. They are going after him because he does not want to continue giving welfare to Apartheid Israel. They are going after him because he will not sell American interests out to anyone for any reason. Ron Paul is a true American who wants to bring the Constitution back. He wants to uphold the ideals of the founders. RP 08′

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul Snapshot

Friday, December 21st, 2007

ronpauldonblack.jpg

Paul has rejected the support of white supremacists openly and firmly. He has called their ideology “immoral” and “small”. Paul has also openly denounced racism, calling it “an ugly form of collectivism”.

Ron Paul with Don Black an American white nationalist neo-Nazi. He is the founder and current webmaster of the “Stormfront” forum and former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).

Read more from the blog Texas Fred’s

Sphere: Related Content

Neo-Nazis have deep pockets, pimping for Ron Paul

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

ronpaul08.jpgFound this on Wonkette, made me laugh!

Despite all the trumpeting of (and spamming about, and commenting on) Ron Paul’s money-making tea party last weekend, it turns out that, somehow, Ron Paul needs all the money he can get. So while Obama and Edwards openly turn away contributions from lobbyists and everyone else seemingly finds a way to send back money from those they find personally distasteful, Ron Paul’s campaign has confirmed that they will keep the $500 donation from Don Black of the neo Nazi pig fucker website Stormfront. Because, as spokesman Jesse Benton said, that’s $500 more for Ron Paul and $500 less for neo Nazi pig fuckers that want to see Ron Paul elected. Um, Jesse? The standard thing to do, for both Republicans and Democrats caught with money with the stench of pig-fucking on it, is to donate it to a charity. Can we recommend some? The NAACP, or the Anti-Defamation League, or the Southern Poverty Law Center? I’d bet they’d do at least equally well spreading “the message of freedom” and making sure that the pig fucker had $500 less dollars. Not that you, you know, actually care. I just thought I’d make a suggestion. [Washington Post]

I have not said anything about Ron Paul in awhile, I figure why alienate my Ron Paul homies because hopefully they will come to their senses and get behind a real candidate Fred Thompson.

Despite raising a record number of dead presidents in one day, Ron Paul has a snowballs chance in hell of surviving past a couple of primaries.
This post points out what I said long ago, Paul obviously does not give a shit about PR.
Accepting money from Neo-Nazi fucks is perfectly ok with him.
I’m just wondering Ron Paul fans, particularly those of you who have given money to the campaign, does it not occur to you that for every dollar Ron Paul accepts from these racist fucks, three gets pissed away because of the negative publicity. Basically lost credibility costs you money in a campaign and you can’t get that back.
Paul’s campaign is still scoffed at by most observers, because these links to Neo-Nazis won’t go away. I won’t mention his woeful debate performances. YUK

Maybe he sees the handwriting on the wall, knows he is out of it so he is simply trying to stay somewhat relevant and is trying to hold on to the cheers and accolades of his supporters for as long as he can. So who cares where the dollars come from.
Because once he drops out of the race he will disappear into the political haze like so many other failed politicians.

At least he will be able to use some of the money to take some cool vacations, buy himself a nice red sports car or buy himself a shit load of lap dances.

BAD SNOOP! LOL! Oh get a sense of humor people!



Vanguard News Network, the leader of the American National Socialist Workers Party says Ron Paul Lies About Lack Of Involvement With White Nationalists.

Ron Paul Lies About Lack Of Involvement With White NationalistsComrades:

I have kept quiet about the Ron Paul campaign for a while, because I didn’t see any need to say anything that would cause any trouble. However, reading the latest release from his campaign spokesman, I am compelled to tell the truth about Ron Paul’s extensive involvement in white nationalism.

Both Congressman Paul and his aides regularly meet with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review, and others at the Tara Thai restaurant in Arlington, Virginia, usually on Wednesdays. This is part of a dinner that was originally organized by Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis and Joe Sobran, and has since been mostly taken over by the Council of Conservative Citizens.

I have attended these dinners, seen Paul and his aides there, and been invited to his offices in Washington to discuss policy.

For his spokesman to call white racialism a “small ideology” and claim white activists are “wasting their money” trying to influence Paul is ridiculous. Paul is a white nationalist of the Stormfront type who has always kept his racial views and his views about world Judaism quiet because of his political position.

I don’t know that it is necessarily good for Paul to “expose” this. However, he really is someone with extensive ties to white nationalism and for him to deny that in the belief he will be more respectable by denying it is outrageous — and I hate seeing people in the press who denounce racialism merely because they think it is not fashionable.

Bill White, Commander
American National Socialist Workers Party



“Ron Paul disavowed any racist support on the PBS NOW interview.”

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul’s Statement on Racism

Wednesday, November 21st, 2007

3101906j.jpgFrom the blog QandO

Ron Paul, as we’ve mentioned several times, has garnered some attention due to the support that white supremacist groups have given to his campaign. (more 411 here) 

Apparently, this attention has caused to issue a forthright official statement about the evils of racism.

But, while it a statement against racism, it’s kind of an…odd one. Let’s go through his statement in its entirety.

A nation that once prided itself on a sense of rugged individualism has become uncomfortably obsessed with racial group identities.

Well, that’s an interesting start. I seem to remember that way back in the good ol’ Rugged Individualism days, the rugged individualists in about half the country owned slaves. Black slaves, to be precise. That seems to me like the rugged individualists were sort of obsessed with racial group identities, at least insofar as they determined which group could be legally owned by other groups.

As I remember, they even promulgated very specific laws about how much black blood (one drop, basically) one could posesss and be considered a potential slave. Many of the rugged individualists also frowned on sexual relations between racial groups. And, by “frowned on”, I mean “hung the offending member of the disfavored group”.

I don’t think that being “uncomfortably obsessed with racial group identities” is a particularly new phenomena in American cultural life.

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul Excluded from Iowa Debate

Tuesday, November 13th, 2007

Found this on the blog Liberal Values. Not sure why he has a post on Ron Paul but hey I think even some anti-war liberals like the dude, who knows.
Anywho I read this and thought “oh my God, someone’s gonna blow somethin’ up”
Paul supporters are not going to tolerate this shit, LOL!

Ron Paul, along with Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter who also have less than 5% support in the polls, are being excluded from a December 4 Republican debate. Needless to say, Paul’s supporters are angry. On the surface it might make sense to limit the debates to those who appear to have a chance at winning the nomination. The problem is that using the polls to decide who is electable in this manner gives the polls an excessive influence in the final outcome.paul5.JPG

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul Raises More Than $4.2 Million

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) - Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, aided by an extraordinary outpouring of Internet support Monday, hauled in more than $4.2 million in nearly 24 hours. Paul, the Texas congressman with a libertarian tilt and an out-of-Iraq pitch, entered heady fundraising territory with a surge of Web-based giving tied to the commemoration of Guy Fawkes Day.

Fawkes was a British mercenary who failed in his attempt to kill King James I on Nov. 5, 1605. He also was the model for the protagonist in the movie “V for Vendetta.” Paul backers motivated donors on the Internet with mashed-up clips of the film on the online video site YouTube as well as the Guy Fawkes Day refrain: “Remember, remember the 5th of November.”

Paul’s total deposed Mitt Romney as the single-day fundraising record holder in the Republican presidential field. When it comes to sums amassed in one day, Paul now ranks only behind Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton, who raised nearly $6.2 million on June 30, and Barack Obama.

Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said the effort began independently about two months ago at the hands of Paul’s backers. He said Paul picked up on the movement, mentioning in it speeches and interviews.

“It’s been kind of building up virally,” Benton said. The $4.2 million represented online contributions from more than 37,000 donors, fundraising director Jonathan Bydlak said Monday night.Paul has been lagging in the polls behind Republican front-runners. But he captured national attention at the end of September when he reported raising $5.2 million in three months, putting him fourth among Republican presidential candidates in fundraising for the quarter.Paul as of Monday had raised more than $7 million since Oct. 1, more than half his goal of $12 million by the end of the year, according to his Web site.

Paul advocates limited government and low taxes like other Republicans, but he stands alone as the only GOP presidential candidate opposed to the Iraq war. He also has opposed Bush administration security measures that he says encroach on civil liberties.

I think it’s cool that Paul’s supporters are doing more than spamming internet polls, and trolling websites adding “vote for Ron Paul” to random comments sections.

I know you people, just won’t listen to ole Snoop but, what the fuck, it bears repeating.

Ron Paul can raise 100 million dollars in one day, it won’t matter. Unless Paul can get a miraculous makeover, make him look like Tom Brady on the Patriots or something he simply will not be able to convince a significant number of people to invest in him via the vote.
I know many of you Ron Paul fans are enamored by his “message” but his message is not neatly wrapped in a persona package people can rally around.

But lets cast that aside, forget that, Snoop you are full of it, ok. So again, what is Paul’s number one obstacle…… (regular readers need not read, I have been sayin’ this shit over and over)

His number one obstacle is his idiot supporters!
I have never in all the time I have been following politics seen and read such moonbat shit oozing out of the minds of these people.
I swear if I were Ron Paul, I would release a You Tube video, and I would say basically:

“While I appreciate the outpouring of support for my candidacy, we must show respect for opposing viewpoints. Although we may disagree with our fellow Republican opponents on the critical issues facing this nation, we must resist the temptation to engage in name calling and behaviors that would cast a negative light on our campaign.
Our goal is to make our vision for America a clear one. If we succeed in doing that, I feel the American people will in the end see past the superficial aspects of this campaign and make the right choice, choosing our vision for America”

This is an example of what I am talking about:

i believe he will win ,next Reagan :D
just most of people are stupid ass-holes
and they will vote on socialist :)
if you want next Europen Union :D vote on socialists if you want healthy free market vote on Ron Paul !!!Turn on FOX for just a few minutes to watch ALL THE CRAP they’re reporting on — TO AVOID TALKING ABOUT RON PAUL’S AMAZING FEAT IN FUND-RAISING!

ronpaulcult.jpgFox news is a Zionist controlled media outlet design to misinform and brainwash the American people about the truth of their situation. They are against Ron Paul because he want’s to shut down their criminal Federal Reserve and IRS operations.

The time to grab our country back into our hands is now! The road is difficult, as we have created much negative momentum. But the fact that we have this one man Ron Paul bringing a message that is crystal clear to everyone who wants a TRUE upward spiral for our country shows that we are awakening to the profound realization of a better tomorrow.

It’s not over yet. People are catching the news on TV and the net and are deciding Ron Paul can win. It has reached the tipping point. Also Fred Thompson had a headline for having a cocaine dealer in his staff a la Giuliani’s Ravel scandal. That will help Ron Paul as well.

If you Ron Paul followers would just chill out, stop the lunatic ranting, stop posting on racist websites like Stormfront, stop creating multiply online personas and going on You Tube posting the same shit in the comments section on every Ron Paul video, stop saying the world is against Ron Paul and you will avoid having websites posting entries like:
Watch Out! The Ron Paul Acolytes are Coming.

American’s will never take Ron Paul seriously if his supporters scare the shit out of people!

More stuff here: Ron Paul and Alex Jones

Sphere: Related Content

“The Ron Paul cult”

Thursday, November 1st, 2007

Found the post below on the blog Haiku for You, LOL!

Folks I’m not even going to say it, been down that road before. However I’m finding Ron Paul fans more and more amusing as Paul has gained some traction and raised more money recently.
I find it fascinating that his fans are oblivious to the fact that THEY, (the cult followers) are actually getting more attention than Paul is.
I’m reading countless stories about how his cult followers are doing and saying crazy shit, I can’t remember an article where Ron Paul himself has said anything of substance.
Oh well… Examples of the craziness!! - Link

*Do patriotic White Americans finally have a candidate they can vote for without fear of being sold out again?*Ron Paul would collapse the Jewish infrastructure in this country.
Christian Identity is the belief that the Jews have usurped the identity and heritage of the white race. We believe that Europeans, not the Jews, are the true Chosen of the one and only God, and that Jesus came only for our people.

*I was having a discussion with my friend the other day and I was trying to explain to him that America is too submissive to the media right now to have a revolution. But after learning more about Ron Paul and about his supporters, I am starting to change my mind.

Wins Every Straw Poll. He practically wins every internet straw poll that includes himself as a candidate. But in the national polls he never polls more than 3% of the vote. How can that be possible. The majority of Americans have internet access. They have access to all of the polls just like everybody else. Then why does Ron Paul command so much attention. You may say that Ron Paul supporters are the only ones so crazy as to vote in these straw polls.

Dominates in All Areas of the Internet. Well, its not only straw polls that he dominates. He dominates in YouTube subscribers, myspace friends. He is also tops of all the second tier candidates in terms of fundraising even though it is clear he gets far less press attention. His supporters are the most vocal. Maybe they do not resonate with the rest of America but maybe that is because the rest of America has not heard of him yet. It all depends on what happens once they all hear of him, what will happen.

Supporters Impacting the Campaign Positively. We recommend all you Ron Paul supporters out there to continue doing what you are doing. You guys are having an impact on the political process. And if the media coverage is less than spectacular, do not fear. Because in 100 years, we are going to be looking back at this time and wondering how naive and selfless the media was to try to silence all the Ron Paul supporters.



Yikes! White Supremacists Endorse Ron Paul

Yawn: Snoop responding to another racist jackass Ron Paul fan!

“Oh Snoop, you’re wrong about Ron Paul”

Ron Paul’s campaign trying to find out how to cheat in online poll?
 

THE POST

paul3.jpg

Obsessively, compulsively spamming Digg and any other online forum with open comments, busily mobbing every single online poll so they can declare themselves “TEH WINNARS!!”  of unscientific internet polls.Can often be found in the cesspools of the intarweb, such as 9/11 “truther” sites (i.e. Prison Planet) and white supremacist forums (i.e. Stormfront).

When obnoxiousness is confronted by the rare reasonable RP supporter, one usually is subjected to a massive display of verbal diarrhea, such as “F*CK THAT THIS IS OUR REVOLUTION AND THERE’S NO TIME FOR CIVILITY YOU NEOCOMMUNIST!!!11!”

For webmasters of every stripe, the Ron Paul Cult phenomenon has provided, along with the general headache of having to smack spammy trolls, much amusement as provoking them with even the mildest criticism or disagreement results in a torrent of site traffic. (Trust me, it’s true.)”

Sphere: Related Content

Ron Paul…

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

911.jpgOk, I found this one Red State.  The headline, RON PAUL RULES[,] YOU [Expletive deleted] FASCIST[,] BUSH[-]SUPPORTING[,] RED STATE[,] INBRED MORONS[!!!!!]
Apparently a Ron Paul supporter does not like Red State or any other individual not supporting Ron Paul.

GO BACK TO ALABAMA[,] YOU [expletive involving sexual relations deleted] [expletive involving oral-genital contact deleted] [expletive alleging incest deleted] RED STATE[,] NO[-]BRAIN IDIOTS[!!!!!] KEEP GOING TO IRAQ AND DYING SO [that] BUSH AND HIS FRIENDS CAN GET RICH OFF [of] YOUR CORPSE[s*]. KEEP WATCHING NASCAR AND DRINKING BUD LIGHT[**]. KEEP SCARFING [up] THE MCDONALD[’]S. KEEP MAKING AD HOMINEM ATTACKS ON LIBERALS AND RON PAUL SUPPORTERS. KEEP BEING TOO STUPID TO KNOW WHAT AD HOMINEM MEANS. KEEP BEING IDIOT NEO[-]FASCIST REPUBLICANS. KEEP HELPING BUSH AND CHENEY DESTROY THE CONSTITUTION WHILE [still] CALLING YOURSELVES PATRIOTS.RON PAUL RULES[,] AND YOUR FASCIST TACTICS WILL ACCOMPLISH NOTHING!!![*Presumably, he’d like more than one of us to go.]

[**I would like to note for the record that I do not. This is also the closest that I’ve gotten to being personally offended by any of these guys.]

[Remember, kids: Ron Paul supporter. One of the smarter ones, too: he can spell “fascist.” - Moe Lane]

See this is why I said many times, the biggest obstacle for Ron Paul is his own supporters. This idiocy is more the norm than not. Don’t believe me, go to You Tube and find any video clips about Ron Paul. Very humorous reading.

Sphere: Related Content

Yikes! White Supremacists Endorse Ron Paul

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

Ok folks ya know on some days I turn on the computer scan my news and blogs and nothing really grabs me to post and I’m like, this is not a good day to blog.

Then I know it should be a good day when the first thing I check out in my links section is some gay web site defending what I called a leather freak fest, then on my first blog scan I find this piece on the blog Citizen Against Lies, where my favorite white racist hate site Stormfront.org has an endorsement for president for my favorite candidate
Ron Paul. Oh God all I can do is laugh. Man I hope the posts continue to get better as the day rolls along. I was kinda out of it arriving at my office now I’m in a much better mood. Blogging can do that sometimes!

First the Video:

Disturbed by the Ron Paul Cult of ‘white nationalists’ yet? I will add this first of all: I’m not a big fan of AIPAC, and that’s putting it mildly. But I sure don’t want some freaky white supremacist chick pointing out any of my thoughts on YouTube.

If Ron Paul has a hope in Hades of raising any more money for his campaign, he’d better renounce this endorsement. Why? Because who endorses you speaks to your character. There’s something they see in you that they like.

If David Duke saw something in my character to like enough to endorse me, I’d be worried. And his acceptance of that endorsement speaks even more to his character. Stormfront is a vile right-wing supremacist web site that I won’t link to, it’s so vile. Yet here they are endorsing the good doctor. I don’t understand the appeal of Stormfront or of Ron Paul as a candidate for president.

Read the rest of this post here

Ah what the heck lets visit Stormfront and see what lunacy I can find on Ron Paul.
Damm it’s hard to blog when you are too busy laughing!

not one politician in this country even comes to close to the stature of this man. part of the NWO agenda is to destroy the US, they can not afford to let Ron Paul get into power but he is gaining ground everywhere he goes and on every debate he takes part in.if Ron Paul gets in there will be no going into Iran which is why i believe that the NWO-elite will cause a war to happen before the US election is over.

LOL!

Haha. Absolutely awesome. It’s fantastic to read of such success for Paul, but of course I am realistic enough to know that sadly, he will never be allowed to actually win. If there was any chance of Paul actually winning, then he had better have some very good security, because I can tell you right now, someone would kill him in order to prevent him becoming US president.
A single truth can shatter a thousand lies.

LOL!

Ron Paul 100% i do not support anyone else. tancredo’s only damn issue is immigration which granted is a good issue but he turns every question into something about immigration its very irritating the rest are politicians ron paul on the other hand is a statesman!
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children!

Sphere: Related Content

Romney loses Nevada Straw Poll…TO RON PAUL!!

Monday, October 15th, 2007

paul2.jpgFrom NBC/NJ’s Erin McPike

SPARKS, Nev. – Ron Paul won the GOP presidential straw poll conducted by organizers at the Conservative Leadership Conference held at the Nugget Casino this weekend “by a large margin,” according to an organizer.

Paul won with 33 percent, Romney came in second with 16 percent and Duncan Hunter was just behind with 15 percent. “Undecided” was fourth with 11 percent, and Thompson and Giuliani were next and ahead of the rest of the pack — all in single digits. Raw numbers haven’t been provided, but there were approximately 430 registrants at the opening of the conference.

Although many of the Republican presidential teams had surrogates representing them at the conference, Mitt Romney and Duncan Hunter were the only candidates to speak at the conference, and the victor himself was not there.

Libertarian sentiment dominated the conference, and a number of attendees expressed disappointment with the Republican Party for not catering to many of their views. Several speakers explained that they were looking to move on, echoing much of the discontent that came out of the meeting of the Council for National Policy in Salt Lake City late last month.

Read the rest, but why bother, Romney, DUDE,  I think it tis time you packed up the tent and went home.