politicalpartypoop.com

REMEMBER: Kerry Belittles U.S. Troops

Fucking asshole Steven King insults soldiers - Yup his message board is closed

#######

I don’t want to sound like an ad–a public service ad on TV–but the fact is that if you can read you can walk into a job later on. If you don’t then you got the Army, Iraq, I don’t know, something like that. It’s not as bright. So that’s my little commercial for that.

King thinks the troops stationed in Iraq are illiterate, uneducated people who couldn’t get jobs in the U.S. Nice. Real nice.

In 2005 a Pentagon official addressed the myth of the stupid soldier [via Gateway Pundit]:

“They are so clearly a cut above America,” Bill Carr, acting deputy undersecretary of defense for military personnel policy, said of today’s recruits.

Carr bristles when he hears unfounded charges that the men and women entering the military are less educated, less affluent or less likely than other 18- to 24-year-olds to have alternatives to military service. Rather, a combination of volunteerism and commitment to service is prompting young people to enlist, Carr said, noting that a measure of shrewdness plays into their decision. “They are planning their future and considering what part we can play in it,” he said.

Carr likes to think of himself as a “myth buster,” helping break stereotypes he said are flat-out wrong and cheat servicemembers out of the pride they’ve earned and deserve.

MORE ON THE BLOG The American Mind

########

 From Newsbusters: Horror Author Tells Fans to Email NB, Shuts Down Discussion of Anti-military Remarks

The saga of horror novelist Stephen King’s disgraceful comments about America’s military took an interesting turn Monday when shortly after instructing visitors to his website to send me a message stating “Hi, Noel—Stephen King says to shut up and I agree,” his own message boards were shut down.

This followed the creation of a number of threads by members that wanted to comment about King’s remarks.

The cover-story for shutting down the boards came from the Moderator in a thread entitled “Stephen King Insults Soldiers“:

Another post: Stephen King Pulls a John Kerry

Sphere: Related Content

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said Sunday that Republicans are using “hate and divisiveness” to win elections.

Dean argued that the use of Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) former pastor Jeremiah Wright in GOP ads in local races is “race baiting.”

 MORE HERE

 

####

10 Mind-Numbingly Stupid Quotes by Howard Dean

10) “I think with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, you can’t play, you know, hide the salami, or whatever it’s called.” –urging President Bush to make public Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers’s White House records

9) “You know, the Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people. They’re a pretty monolithic party. Pretty much, they all behave the same, and they all look the same. … It’s pretty much a white Christian party.” –speaking about the lack of outreach to minority communities by political parties

8) “I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks.”

7) “I’m a metrosexual.” –employing the buzz phrase for straight men who are in touch with their feminine sides, then later admitting he didn’t know what the term means

6) “We’ve gotten rid of (Saddam Hussein), and I suppose that’s a good thing.”

5) “The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong.”

4) “This president is not interested in being a good president.

He’s interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father.”

3) “Now that we’re on dog pee, we can have an interesting conversation about that. I do not recommend drinking urine…but if you drink water straight from the river, you have a greater chance of getting an infection than you do if you drink urine.” —teaching an eight-grade science class in La Crosse, Wisconsin

2) “You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever and get home and still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well Republicans, I guess can do that. Because a lot of them have never made an honest living in their lives.”

1) “Not only are we going to New Hampshire … we’re going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we’re going to California and Texas and New York! And we’re going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we’re going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!” –Iowa concession speech

 

Sphere: Related Content

This is a portion from the chronic Negro liberal Oliver Willis

“the vast majority of blacks engaged in politics are moving forward you have a miniscule few who for whatever the reason (I tend to think its for them to adopt a contrarian pose) will vote Republican. As a result, they are outliers within their own race and essentially position themselves against the tide of black history. The tried and true response of black conservatives is to look at themselves as some kind of hero or martyrs. The larger conservative movement, unable to attract a sizable percentage of black votes, trumpets these kinds of stories again and again. Like this blog post from the hard-right Human Events:

Blacks who will vote for McCain this fall are some of the most courageous people on the planet, because of the extreme social scorn they will face from their left-wing black counterparts.

It takes courage to challenge the dominant social order. It took courage for Elia Kazan to battle pro-Communist sentiment in the 1950s. It took courage for Martin Luther King to fight Jim Crow in the 1960s. It took courage for Ronald Reagan to confront institutionalized liberalism in the 1980s. Likewise, it will take courage for black Republicans like [Michael] Steele to combat “Obama-ism” in the late-2000s.

Of course, a black person supporting McCain is not courageous at all. If you want to truly compare it to the 1960s its the equivalent of seeing Bull Connor sic dogs on people and saying “Hey guys, let’s cool it on all this civil rights stuff, we may upset some people.”

READ FULL POST HERE

######

This is another in the long line of clueless Negros who will stop at nothing at dissing Negros who exhibits any measure of independent thought.
Just for the record if asshole happens to read this, I am not planning on voting for McCain because he is a closet liberal sellout Republican weasel like a great many of current idiot fuck Republicans like the moron Governor of Indiana.

I do not vote for nor have I ever voted for “an individual” as much as I vote for principles, which is the primary reason why I will not waist my time voting for McCain in November.
I see him in the same mold as idiot fuck Newt pimping climate change bullshit with that liberal hack Nancy Pelosi. Newt is one of a growing crop if RINO’s who believes in compromising with idiot fuck liberals when I believe they should be doing the opposite.

As far as his post referring to anti-Obama Negros as “martyrs” and that fellow Negro conservative “prop up policies that hurt black America” is simply embarrassingly retarded and intellectually vacant.

As I have said many times on this blog, as a black man Obama’s ascension to the presidency is not high on my priority list nor will his presidency make me more of a man or a better black man. And just as any idiot liberal, Obama’s policies will no doubt keep way too many black folks, uneducated, unmotivated and impoverished. No amount of right wing Negro conservative bashing I hear from clueless Negros hacks will make me think otherwise.
This is why black folks are so fucked now because most are damm sheep and end up raising fucked up kids like the one in the “kill Bush” video below.

Instead of these stupid Niggas writing these fucken moronic posts castigating Negros who refuses to buy into Obama’s or any other Democrat bullshit try educating me on just how the Magic Negro plans to magically stop Niggas from killing each other, snorting child support payments up their noses, taking care of their kids and dropping out of school at an alarming rate. Then the ears may perk up.

Sphere: Related Content

A great example of how stupid and racist liberals are…

Here’s another thing I don’t like about this primary: now that there are only two Democratic candidates, it’s suddenly horribly absolutely crystal-clear that this is an election about gender and race. This may have always been true, but weeks ago it wasn’t so obvious — once upon a time there were eight candidates, and although six of them withered away, their presence in the campaign managed to obscure things. Even around the time of Ohio, when there were primarily three candidates, the outlines were murky, because Edwards was still in there, picking up votes from all sectors.But now there are two and we’re facing Pennsylvania and whom are we kidding? This is an election about whether the people of Pennsylvania hate blacks more than they hate women. And when I say people, I don’t mean people, I mean white men.

 How ironic is this? After all this time, after all these stupid articles about how powerless white men are and how they can’t even get into college because of overachieving women and affirmative action and mean lady teachers who expected them to sit still in the third grade even though they were all suffering from terminal attention deficit disorder — after all this, they turn out (surprise!) to have all the power. (As they always did, by the way; I hope you didn’t believe any of those articles.)

Read the rest on the Huffington Post by Nora Ephron

Sphere: Related Content

 I’m a day late on this because of my KU victory hangover, anywho in case you missed it this first video clip is yesterday’s Today Show segment on some sort of revenge attack exacted for gossiping about the suspects on MySpace. The victim suffered a concussion and damage to the left eye and ear, out of which she currently can’t hear. Each of the eight suspects are facing two felonies and three of them are facing a third. 

###########
The second clip is a discussion on the rise of these cyber bully crimes committed by teens.
#######

################

This morning I was watching Mike and Mike in the Morning and there was a discussion on fan behavior and how rude and obnoxious people are at sporting events.
It’s obvious that civility is lacking in our society, DUH!
I was considering writing something with this entire sports fan civility twist but I figured why bang the keyboard revealing the obvious, fans are rude and screwed up but we in society have a much bigger problem.

How long has there been really fucked up people in human society? I would guess since humans began to communicate and walk upright.
Thanks to You Tube people are perfectly willing to air their sick, twisted mentally deficient behavior to starving voyeurs around the globe.

But hey we have lying ass politicians “misspeaking” on a daily basis with little or no repercussions knowing these lies will be highlighted on You Tube and knowing that their political fans will completely ignore their verbal gaffs.

On blog/websites we have shit loads of racial hostility directed at those who have opposing societal views.
We have political hostilities directed at those who differ on stances from “climate change” to the war in Iraq. The hatred frankly is overwhelming.

I sometimes think of how folks perceive me on this blog. I do come off as brash, angry, pissed off. Now I’m an opinionated bastard and what I say here I’m honest about and if I were having a conversation with someone I would still express myself in a very opinionated manner, but I’m not mean about it. I don’t have anything going on in my life that would cause me to be constantly mean and hostile about.

Back to the teens, why the hell would these teens videotape the “animalistic” beating of this girl? As far as I’m concerned instead of bitching and moaning about My Space and You Tube you have to focus on the families of these kids.

Look at the mom in the first clip typical white trash piece of shit almost blaming the victim while brushing aside the responsibility of her own daughter.

Let’s get real here if you are in a fucked up marriage/relationship, family, fucked up job, you look in the mirror and don’t like what you see or you see yourself as a failure you will take that frustration out on anybody and everybody.
That could be a fan shouting obscenities at a player, jealous at the millions of dollars that athlete is making.
Road rage because you are driving an hour to work in shitty traffic to a job where you hate your boss and your boss treats you like dirt.
THEN you have to go home and deal with your “idiot” spouse and Bart Simpson like kids.
What happens from all of that anger, you pass off your rude, obnoxious, socially repulsive fucked up behavior to your kids and what results are these socially repulsive teens. This is not rocket science.

Best example below, the text is from a website called Radar Online there is an article Meet the Web’s 10 most hated people.
Check out the story of the most hated person Lori Drew. After reading that ask yourself how big a piece of shit individual must you be to pull off this level of callousness.
This lady clearly has issues. Just watch any reality show. These shows are full of the most retarded self absorbed folks on the planet. Treating your fellow man like shit is a spectator sport.
In this lady’s case how the fuck is My Space to blame for the behavior of this piece of human trash?

From shouting obnoxious fans in a sports stadium, to overcrowded highways, to cyberspace, I swear I’m not sure if people are getting more fucked up.
However for me thank God I’m not around such angry piece of shit examples of human debris.
I have a loving family, Mrs. Snoop, my grandkids, love my job, satisfied with my life and existence.

I guess I’m sick of these calls again blaming internet sites, text messaging or some sort of technological aspect for why people or kids are fucked up.
Frankly people need to find God, or some religion (not some cult crap). Family counseling, intact families, I don’t know but the “is society getting worse” question is a never-ending debate. Heck I’m just a blog dude what do I know!?

############

1. LORI DREW

You know you’ve struck a nerve with the Internet masses when your saga has been covered breathlessly by media outlets big and small, yet the first Google hit involving your name is titled “People You’ll See in Hell.” But that’s what happens when you’re an adult who maybe drove an adolescent girl to suicide. A fantastic account of the whole sordid mess can be found in the New Yorker, but for the uninitiated, the story goes something like this: A 13-year-old girl named Meghan Meier hung herself in the upstairs closet of her suburban Missouri home after receiving a bunch of nasty MySpace messages from a boy she had been corresponding with. Except the boy in question, “Josh Evans,” wasn’t actually a boy: He was the fictional creation of a woman named Lori Drew, the mother of a girl with whom young Meier had once been friends. Meghan and the friend had a falling out, as adolescent girls are wont to do, which prompted the girl’s mom to punish Meghan by “friending” her as a 16-year-old hottie named “Josh Evans.” Seemingly, Drew planned on toying with Meghan’s emotions to teach her some sort of life lesson, failing to realize that 13-year-old girls are fragile creatures who don’t take well to that style of teaching. Granted, it later came out that Drew knew Meghan had battled depression, making her cold “This isn’t my fault and I had no idea this would happen” defense ring somewhat hollow. (To make matters worse, she even enlisted the help of another young girl to make the ruse more plausible.)

Interestingly enough, the St. Charles Journal, the paper that originally broke the story, didn’t mention Drew by name, but a bunch of pissed-off bloggers eventually outed her. Drew hasn’t yet been charged with a crime, but prosecutors are looking to see if her creating the fake MySpace account can be grounds for fraud. In the interim, congratulations, Lori! You are officially the most despised person in the whole wide web!

Sphere: Related Content

WASHINGTON — Senator John McCain never fails to call himself a conservative Republican as he campaigns as his party’s presumptive presidential nominee. He often adds that he was a “foot soldier” in the Reagan revolution and that he believes in the bedrock conservative principles of small government, low taxes and the rights of the unborn.

What Mr. McCain almost never mentions are two extraordinary moments in his political past that are at odds with the candidate of the present: His discussions in 2001 with Democrats about leaving the Republican Party, and his conversations in 2004 with Senator John Kerry about becoming Mr. Kerry’s running mate on the Democratic presidential ticket.

There are wildly divergent versions of both episodes, depending on whether Democrats or Mr. McCain and his advisers are telling the story. The Democrats, including Mr. Kerry, say that not only did Mr. McCain express interest but that it was his camp that initially reached out to them. Mr. McCain and his aides counter that in both cases the Democrats were the suitors and Mr. McCain the unwilling bride.

More here

Sphere: Related Content

With all due respect to my fellow blogger at Politik Ditto and any other “conservative, republican blogger or part time pundit, I’m stunned at the amount of limited political framework many of you people have.Now this particular quote is from Larry Elder, you can read the full quote here, but this is symptomatic of what I keep reading in the right blogsphere and from right leaning pundits who are either remarkable clueless or are simply trying to kiss John McCain’s tired ass because they don’t want to be thrown under the bus when the old bastard wins the presidency.

This is why, when you listen to pundits, either on the radio or on one of the increasingly annoying talk shows take that into consideration, what do they have to gain by dissing McCain? If you are a Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin who are steadfast in their disdain for McCain they don’t give a fuck about McCain and their success does not hinge on McCain blessing them or reaching out to them.

But before I continue, read the quote:

As to the Supreme Court, think of the many 5-4 decisions, including but not limited to, Bush v. Gore, the decision that put President Bush in the White House. McCain supported nominees like Justices Alito, Thomas, Scalia, and Roberts. Why, he even voted for the “reactionary” Judge Robert Bork. Justice John Paul Stevens is 87 years old, with four more justices near or over 70. One more conservative appointee, and Roe v. Wade could be history. Are principled conservatives truly willing to allow that decision to remain for at least another generation? To quote another John, this time McEnroe, “You cannot be serious!”

Now first ask yourself, why would Elder make this particular statement? I’m thinking no shit Sherlock, that would be one seemingly logical assumption. But Elder is on the lower rung of the talk show posse. Don’t you think that with Elder, being right leaning that he just might want McCain to appear on his talk show one of these days?

However as we will soon see pundits will keep this bullshit trying to browbeat folks into being more enthusiastic about McCain. I’m like fuck McCain, don’t like him, won’t vote for him and I have my little corner of the blogsphere to give my 100 percent honest assessment of him.
Just imagine us in a nice pub somewhere knocking down some shots of your favorite whisky chatting.

First McCain in his early days will no doubt rail about Iraq, the war on terror, national security, bla bla bla, Democrats will again be pissed at fucking up another run at the White House and will no doubt will be bitching that Bush stole the election AGAIN.
But remember more than being president these people run for the presidency to leave a legacy and McCain, someone who is already prone to working with idiot Democrats in order to “get things done” on the domestic front, he will no doubt throw out the olive branch for his domestic agenda.

This is where our friend Elder is either remarkable dense or he conveniently leaves it out of his little rant.

McCain likely will be facing a Congress with larger majorities of Democrats than it now has.
It is far more likely that there will be significant Democratic gains in the Senate. The House looks decent for them too. If President McCain wants legislative victories, he will have to turn to those majorities to get them enacted. And he will be happy to do so. That’s how McCain has always operated, and there is no reason to believe that if he becomes president, he will operate in any other manner.

The conservatives who have opposed McCain during the campaign have cited his positions on immigration, campaign finance, climate change, tax cuts, and legal rights for detainees where he has sided with Democrats.

When McCain decides to work with the Democrats, he is really with them full throttle.
McCain is not someone who simply reaches across the aisle to form coalitions with the other side. He walks across the aisle, and gets into the Democrat huddle.
Every president wants to accomplish shit, no matter how stupid; anyone with any measure of common fucken sense knows he will have to do so on the Democrats’ terms.
So people like Elder can run this “Supreme Court bullshit” all they want, but if you think McCain will be able to get away with nominating conservative leaning types to the court you are badly mistaken.

A John McCain presidency will be a huge disaster for Republicans, that statement is slight irrelevant now of course, if Obama is the Democrat nominee, McCain will be the prez unless he does something or says something stupid in a debate like, “we are going to be in Iraq for 100 years.” Old white people are the strongest voting block, old white people, now in their late 60’s or 70’s, the ones who either stood on the sidelines, pretended that it was not going on, or did not give a shit while black folks we being lynched, and denied access to public places and creating suburbia escaping from Negros are not likely to vote for a socialist Negro.

These Republicans like Romney who are now speaking up for McKein, are doing so out of party loyalty and possible future perks.
Political pundits who speak in favor of McCain are doing so because they want to get on his good side.
Jesus people when you read or hear about candidate endorsements ask yourself one simple question, what does that individual have to gain by pimping for candidate A or B?

If McCain is the prez, and you are a reporter or pundit you don’t think dude will have you sitting in the corner of the White House briefing room behind a support post?
Consider this the next time you read these blogs now as many of them are now political insiders and subject to perks.

Politics are not that difficult to figure out when you factor in the “what’s in it for me” element.

Sphere: Related Content

I shall put myself in “timeout” for falling for such a fucken fraud, Fred Thompson and his phony “conservative” campaign.

Found Via Hot Air  - (full post here)  - The Bolton endorsement and the Fred endorsement on the same day. 

While campaigning in Wichita, this afternoon with KS senator and former presidential candidate Sam Brownback, John McCain announced that he had recently received the support of another former candidate. “I also spoke again yesterday to my friend Fred Thompson who assured me he is ready to do whatever it takes to help me win the election in November,” McCain said. “I’m very proud to have the friendship and support of Fred Thompson as well.”

Sphere: Related Content

Michelle Malkin Live from CPAC: McCain into the lion’s den; Armey disses Coulter, George Allen, Tom Coburn endorse McCain; Mac: “We should do this more often;” to shamnesty opponents: “I respect your opposition”

I watched his speech and still was not impressed. Although GOP party insiders, desperate to keep the party intact, will pimp for him as much as possible.

I believe that he feels that all of this opposition to him is manufactured, that we will eventually come around and support him for the good of the party.

So the smug bastard spoke a CPAC and received some bogus applause from paid campaign groupies. Big deal!!

Let me focus on one thing he keeps saying and why I don’t trust his ass for one minute.
“we need to secure the borders” no you don’t, you don’t need a damm fence to keep Mexicans from crossing over. If this man were serious about convincing us conservatives that he is serious about illegal immigration, this is what he would have said;

I understand the seriousness of illegal immigration and the threat it poses to this nation.
As president I will do the following:
1) I will stop the flow of federal dollars to cities that harbor illegal aliens.
2) I will oppose giving automatic citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and foreign visitors.
3) I will work to establish a universal system for checking welfare and work eligibility.
4) I will propose that stiff fines be levied at companies that hire illegal or undocumented immigrants.
5) I will oppose any legislation that seeks to grant drivers licenses to illegal immigrants.
6) I will instruct local authorities to report to federal authorities any criminal offense perpetrated by an illegal immigrant.
7) I will end all public benefits for illegal aliens.
8) I will make alien smuggling and document fraud a federal offense.

But who am I kidding McCain won’t say that shit. He will just keep repeating “border security first” and hope that the public will buy into his bullshit.

Don’t forget that his running mate will likely be Mike “Mexican consulate in Arkansas” Huckabee. McCain seriously must think we all have jackass stamped on our foreheads.

Sphere: Related Content

Remember the possibility of a McCain John Kerry ticket?
From The Daily Oakland Press [2004]:
McCain has said he would not run with Kerry, but last month he renewed speculation when he was asked on ABC’s “Good Morning America” whether he would consider running with Kerry. He replied, “Obviously, I would entertain it.”

From The Hill:
“Look,” McCain said on the radio show, “I was approached by Democrats, sure. I was approached by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to run as his running mate in 2004 and I rejected it out of hand.”Laughing, McCain added, “It was the smartest thing I ever did.”
**********
John McCain Hillary Clinton Best Friends

Sphere: Related Content

This is an old post from Think Progress in 2006, just in case you did not catch before…

John McCain has made clear that he doesn’t like the blogosphere.Now he has introduced legislation that would treat blogs like Internet service providers and hold them responsible for all activity in the comments sections and user profiles. Some highlights of the legislation:

– Commercial websites and personal blogs “would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000.”

– Internet service providers (ISPs) are already required to issue such reports, but under McCain’s legislation, bloggers with comment sections may face “even stiffer penalties” than ISPs.

— Social networking sites will be forced to take “effective measures” — such as deleting user profiles — to remove any website that is “associated” with a sex offender. Sites may include not only Facebook and MySpace, but also Amazon.com, which permits author profiles and personal lists, and blogs like DailyKos, which allows users to sign up for personal diaries.

Kevin Bankston of the Electronic Frontier Foundation notes that this proposal may be based more “on fear or political considerations rather than on the facts.” When he introduced his legislation to the Senate, McCain offered no evidence that children are being victimized by people who post comments on blogs.

McCain’s legislation could deal a serious blow to the blogosphere. Lacking resources to police their sites, many individual blogs may have to shut down open discussion.
Original post from The Liberty Papers

Red State had this post: The Regulator

Sphere: Related Content

This is from Erick at Red State

I have sad news to report.While the Republicans in the United States House of Representatives are willing to fight for conservative principles, particularly those that divide the Democratic caucus in the House, the Republicans in the United States Senate have agreed to capitulate to the Democratic agenda.

Yesterday, I obtained internal Senate emails from Senator Lamar Alexander’s staff. Senator Alexander is in charge of setting the GOP agenda. The emails, which you can read here, signal an intention to cave in to Democratic “bipartisan” initiatives and abandon all efforts to rein in earmarks and spending.

What makes this more troubling is that at yesterday’s GOP Senate retreat, pollster David Winston told the Republicans that one reason they lost the Senate was because of spending. Senator Alexander and the Republican leadership have decided to reject that data and, instead, embrace their minority status.

Rather than push bold conservative issues, the Senate GOP Leadership will instead enjoy the table scraps Harry Reid, Teddy Kennedy, and Hillary Clinton throw them from the leadership table.

Please call your Republican Senator at (202) 224-3121 and tell him to reject bipartisan expansions of government and fight for conservative ideas that stop wasteful spending on bridges to nowhere and Hippie museums.

Sphere: Related Content

From Michelle Malkin -  I hope my absolute disdain for John McCain is not too obvious, LOL!

After spearheading a disastrous, security-undermining illegal alien amnesty bill last year with Teddy Kennedy, “straight-talking” GOP Sen. John McCain claims he has seen the light. In TV appearances, he vows to put immigration enforcement first.

On the campaign trail, he offers a perfunctory promise to strengthen border security and emphasizes the need to restore Americans’ trust in their government’s ability to defend the homeland. Not all of us have forgotten how the short-fused Arizona senator cursed good-faith opponents in his own party (“F**k you!” and “Chickensh*t” were the choice words he had for Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn during a spat over enforcement provisions).

Not all of us have forgotten that he voted against barring felons from receiving amnesty benefits under his plan. Not all of us have forgotten the underhanded, debate-sabotaging manner in which McCain/Kennedy/Graham/Harry Reid conspired to ram their package down voters’ throats.

For all his supposed, newfound enlightenment about what most Americans want—protection against invasion, commitment to the rule of law, meaningful employer sanctions, an end to sanctuary cities, enforcement-by-attrition plus deportation reform, and an end to special illegal alien benefits that invite more law-breaking–The Maverick remains a Geraldo Rivera Republican. Like the ethnocentric cable TV host who can’t string a sentence about immigration together without drowning in emotional demagoguery, McCain naturally resorts to open-borders platitudes when pressed for enforcement specifics.

Read the full post here

Sphere: Related Content

The only political candidate worthy of my vote!


From Sweetness & Light 

War News Good? Let’s Create A Recession - A search for the term “recession” in the pages of the New York Times turns up 210 results just in the past 30 days

***********

Ron Paul Nutbars Crow About Nevada - From Brainsters Blog

You know you’re pathetic when you point to a state where you got 14% of the vote in a state caucus where you ran the only TV ads. An LA Times blogger enthuses:

Boy, oh, boy! Hidden behind all the hoopla, headlines and the Nevada caucus victories of Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton is one little-noticed but stunning political development and number:Ron Paul, the one-time Libertarian candidate and 10-term Republican congressman from Texas, was in second place. That’s right, Second Place. The 72-year-old ob-gyn who’s always on the end of the line at GOP debates or barred altogether, was running ahead of John McCain, Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, in fact, ahead of….all other Republicans except Romney, who easily captured his second state in a week after Michigan.

Woooooot! The Ron Paul Love Revolution is surging!

************

Also from Brainster - Drama Queen Conservative Bloggers

Add Jeff Goldstein to the list: I will not, will not, vote for John McCain.Oh, and he won’t vote for Mike Huckabee, either, and would have to hold his nose to vote for Mitt Romney. If Fred doesn’t win the nomination then Jeff’s going to sit this one out. LOL! Funniest thing Goldstein’s ever written.One of John Hawkins’ weekend guests does a little DQ herself:Jeff captures my ennui perfectly. And this reminds me of what I’ve written before: bloggers are a different breed than the average American. The air we breath on the conservative side is as rarefied as the air breathed in newsrooms around America.No, it’s as rarefied as the air breathed in the liberal blogosphere. And I mean that seriously. The idiot lib-bloggers spent all of 2006 trying to beat a Democrat because he was an apostate on one issue. The conservative bloggers look like they’re going to be spending all of 2008 trying to beat a Republican because he was an apostate on one issue.And don’t try to convince me it’s more than that one issue. McCain-Feingold? Tell me that you’re seriously going to sit out an election because of campaign finance laws. Torture (which Goldstein mentions)? Hey, I disagree with the senator on that issue, but guess what? He actually knows what torture is like, unlike Jeff or me.

You know, everybody on the conservative side of the aisle got a big laugh out of the gag that Hillary’s new theme song was, “It’s My Party, and I’ll Cry If I Want To”, and now what happens? Less than two weeks later, they’re singing it too!

*****************
Oh what the hell, so I’m a drama Queen Conservative Blogger, I’m still not voting for McCain. John McCain can kiss my black ass and any blogger who is supporting him who wants to write this trifling bullshit chastising me for my political decision making can also kiss my black ass.

I said before and I will keep saying, the Democrats can have the fucken White House; I don’t give a shit anymore.
McCain all of these years has been comfortable with kissing the collective asses of Democrats and he is frankly more comfortable with them than he is with his right leaning homies.

The more posts like this I read from McCain pimps just makes me laugh.
Fucken people on these radio talks shows getting on the air and sounding off about these sorry ass candidates, it’s not only irritating it is downright embarrassing.
The political contenders in this election cycles, candidates on both sides of the political aisle are all idiots. I must admit that I frankly feel like a complete jackass for falling for Freds faux candidacy. It was clear that he did not want the gig, I knew this from the beginning but I was searching for something, anything to latch on to. I was a fool, particularly since I posted my support here.
That won’t happen again.

Nobody can convince me that any of these people are worthy of my vote, they all suck; America has successfully fucked the presidential selection process. I seriously doubt that we will ever have a candidate who is truly worthy of the position.
Anyone worthy of the position is too smart to run.
We will be forever left with sinister, lying ass, soulless, pandering slugs who are not even deserving of being mayor of Mayberry much less the most powerful position on the planet.
All these candidates need to do is bullshit (lie to) enough dolts, speak somewhat eloquently blurt out a few crap phrases and magically you have a candidate.

John McCain supporters keep bringing up his time in the Hanoi Hilton, like being a POW automatically shoots you to the front of the presidential line.
POW or not, if your political ideology is full of holes, then you won’t get my vote.
If that draws the ire of you McCain supporters then screw you.

Sphere: Related Content

This image released by Golfweek magazine shows the cover of the Jan. 19, 2008 issue. Dave Seanor, vice president and editor of the weekly magazine, said he was overwhelmed by negative reaction to the photo of a noose on the cover of this week’s issue, illustrating a story about the suspension of Golf Channel anchor, Kelly Tilghman , for using the word ‘lynch’ in an on-air discussion about how to beat Tiger Woods

Read article: Golfweek noose elicits strong reaction

Look out, soon will come ANOTHER hollow apology from some cracka.
I’m going to keep asking this until I stop reading these idiot ass stories.
You white folks out there STILL think that race is no longer an issue?

Why would the “former” editor of this magazine even consider putting a noose on the cover of a magazine, particularly since noose stories dominated the headlines just a few months ago? You simply must be a colossal retard not to process the ramifications of this. And the idiot bitch who used the “lynching” example as one way to beat Tiger Woods is equally a clueless dolt. This shit will not go away, it’s not like I’m searching for these fucken stories and yet as I search for reactions, more websites and blogs are filled with white folks annoyed at the fact that these stories keep coming to the forefront and that people (black folks) are overly sensitive about racism.
Now we will soon hear from Sharpton, and crackas will be pissed at him for ambulance chasing again, when its dumb ass white people who keep doing and saying stupid shit.

Sphere: Related Content

Tasteless and disgraceful Ron Paul Ad

My self imposed moratorium on Ron Paul post has come to an abrupt halt.
While searching for another video I came across this piece of shit Ron Paul promotional piece as he does what so many other fake ass white people do, praise a dead black icon for political gain.
This is why frankly I wish there were no longer MLK holidays, because every damm year and it irritates the shit out of me, I have to hear white people heap this fake ass praise on King and talk about how great he was knowing damm well that back when black folks were being fire hosed, and attacked by dogs and being harassed by segregationist pimps the majority of these white folks did not give a shit about what King was doing.
As far as I’m concerned this is as distasteful as the white kids throwing the MLK black stereotype parties, promoting a Ron Paul fundraising on of all days MLK day.
Fucken racist fraud fuck, by all means keep throwing your damm paychecks into this dudes pocket, he is not going to fucken become president, so you people will simply become broke ass white trash!

I don’t want to hear shit else about this fraud retard!!

Sphere: Related Content

Found on the blog Blue Tide Rising, leftist blog…

The Kansas Republican Party begins 2008 with a paltry $4,000 cash on hand in the non-federal account. $4,100 isn’t enough to cover payroll and keep the lights on February, and it’s certainly not enough to do the kind of Partybuilding Republicans need to do if they ever hope to rise from the ashes.They raised $53,000 in 2007 but only have $4,100, so what happened to all the money? Answers can be found deeper in the report:

• They finally stopped treating Ron Freeman’s service like slave-labor and honored their contract with him, ponying up nearly $6,000 for his string of failures in 2006. This ate up more than 10% of their already broken budget.
• $5,080 was paid to Singularis (web consultants) to launch two new GOP websites, while the Party’s homepage stagnates. An outsourced website might explain why this prominent misspelling remains online.
• $2,600 was spent of a “Kline for Attorney General” mailing from 2006. How many more debts are out their waiting to be collected on?
• Nearly $6,000 dollars was spent on postage. Caging, apparently, ain’t cheap.

When it rains it pours. The finance reports for a accounts established by the KS GOP to contest the 2nd and 3rd Congressional Districts are looking more a little threadbare as well. Their 2nd District account has less than $500.00 dollars in it. The GOP filed an exemption for the 3rd District account because they were unable to find a single donor willing to give at least 50 dollars.

For contrast, the Kansas Democratic Party filed with $82,000 cash on hand at the beginning of 2008. That’s more than Kobach & Co raised and spent in all of 2007. Democrats raised a whopping $560,000 in 2007. Their Congressional accounts are doing well, too; $11,000 in the 2nd District and $50,000 in the 3rd District.

Republicans are going to need alot o’ luck to reclaim these seats, because they haven’t got alot o’ money.

I only post because there is nothing out there today that excites or interests me.
So when I’m bored I troll leftist blogs.
I found this piece somewhat interesting because one its local and two I find it odd that a liberal blog would waist time snickering at the financial woes of Republicans.
I don’t know do you do this because it makes you feel better ranting about broke ass Republicans?

Then I read further and dudes post touts that the Democrats have raised a whopping $82,000! Oh shit, these mutherfuckers are rollin’ in the dough! Big deal, 82k to borrow a Negro term “ain’t jack.” Typical Democrats, kinda like saying that people are “rich” and when you ask your typical Democrat what “rich” means they can’t tell you, basically anyone not on welfare means rich.
The fact that both parties have paltry fund raising success is because the same old tired ass people are at the head of the ship, no leadership nor cohesiveness, no goals, no call to action.

Anywho being racially sensitive (or overly sensitive) I focused on the line, “They finally stopped treating Ron Freeman’s service like slave-labor” Ron Freeman is a black dude, Democrats can’t help but to inject race into every damm thing.

I have said many times that Kansas Republicans are just fucked, they keep sending me fund raising literature and I have no intention on ever sending these people a dime for the reasons stated above.

I did find the paying of web consultants amusing because I mentioned how shitty and outdated the GOP website was to a number of people and volunteered to work on the site FREE.
I at one time wanted to get more involved in the state GOP party and offered assistance on several issues, website, communication, putting together programs ect but was given the obligatory cold shoulder Negros get when you attempt to stick your toes into the whites only pool.

Oh don’t get me wrong, I’m sure Democrats would have done the same thing.
Someone asked me awhile back if I would be interested on serving on some African-American affairs group. After thinking about it, I though what the heck but was given the cold shoulder by this bunch of old Negro flunkies.
One of the reasons why I’m ranting on this blog, I said fuck it, why involve myself with a bunch of do nothing bastards because most people who serve on these various committees do it for show, and not to actually accomplish anything and if you are an outsider or not willing to conform or ass kiss to participate in these various groups you are not welcomed.
And both of these political parties wonder why people keep ranting about “change.”

Sphere: Related Content

Folks I hope those of you who come a peep my little blog realize one thing, one of the main reasons I blog is for my own educational purposes.
This blog is hardly viewed by nor will it ever be viewed by enough people for it to be “influential” or relevant.
I am an obsessive blog reader, I have said countless times I love my homies on the right, even those with whom I may not agree with on every topic mainly because they are truly educated in the world of politics and most are passionate.

I am really pissed off this morning, partly because I’m a bit cranky since I have been on Mrs. Snoops South Beach diet. I am munching on celery, cherry tomatoes and cottage cheese for breakfast. She says the first two weeks are the hardest, it’s true. I have not had ANY alcohol in almost 3 weeks, no joke. Anywho, Snoop, anger… aimed at so-called Republicans. I usually keep the TV on in my office and I watch the pundit gab fests as background noise and I constantly get pissed at all of the networks including Fox who continue to prop up these fraud ass Republicans and intentionally leave Fred out of the election conversation and it has worked.

I listened to several radio talk shows, (not Rush, he was out yesterday) and the phone lines were filled with “republicans” saying that they did not know ANYTHING about Fred Thompson, and how he has failed to articulate his views on issues.
Forget abut Fred for a minute here, my problem is with these so called Republicans, bunch of old dumb ass ignorant fucks who continue to be so easily swayed by these jackass GOP phonies while at the same time say that “while I was excited about the possibility of a Thompson campaign, he just has not shown me anything.” What the fuck is he suppose to show you, does dude got to dance on his damm head and do magic tricks to get noticed?

I’ve got to give it up to Ron Paul fans, although dude is frankly a political train wreck, his peeps got the word out about him and has forced people to pay some attention to him.
I won’t mention Paul’s treasure chest of issues including his racist past that his fans refuse to acknowledge.
But hey, dude got 7 percent of the vote last night, major props.
Libertarians should back their own, guy and they did it.
However the Republicans, at least the people I hear bitching and moaning are infinitely clueless.
At least the Democrats have a choice between liberal candidates’ number one, number two and number three, while the Republican field is being led by a bunch of closet liberal Democrat flunkies.
I’m angry at the party, and feel that the Republican Party is in deep trouble. I was sent another Republican Party questionnaire and this contribution form, I would not send the GOP a fucken dime, I need to even stop referring to myself as a Republican.
I understand that New Hampshire was not going to be competitive for Fred, but for him to get one fucken percent of the vote is just retarded beyond belief.

Rush talks about this scenario and I totally understand, I really get it, but my hopes for Fred are fading, not for him as a candidate, but that so-called Republicans either too stupid, or increasingly vulnerable to TV pundit yammering and are just too damm lazy to understand the difference between these candidates.
Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter two rock solid, plain spoken individuals without a hint of leftist pandering are nowhere to be found in the conversation, except for most of these politically educated right leaning blogs their message is obviously over most “so-called” Republicans heads.

Folks I would have not problem with people saying to me, I have studied all of the issues and looked at all of the candidates equally but I support candidate A.
But that is not what “Republicans” are doing and saying, they are claiming ignorance, something the party and it’s peeps are showcasing more and more each day.

---

RUSH: Now, I want to remind all my Republican friends that there are many states after Iowa and New Hampshire where the Republican populations are far more indicative of the conservative base, and to get caught up in what happened in Iowa, to get caught up in what’s going to happen in New Hampshire as though they’re the only two states that matter and that they’re going to determine the fallout on both parties is a little bit over the top.Iowa is a caucus; it’s a weird setup. New Hampshire allows independents to vote in the Republican primary, which is why McCain is doing as well as he is doing, and it’s why the media want this to be a bellwether against Romney. I mean, Pat Buchanan came in second. He came in a very strong second in New Hampshire in 1992. Now, I’m not saying that these contests are not to be taken seriously here, and that they’re not to be fought and to be won, but we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. New Hampshire is no longer the conservative barometer it used to be. The state has changed, it is now quite liberal. A lot of people who used to live in Massachusetts have moved into New Hampshire to escape New Hampshire’s high taxation and other problems. New England generally the northern states, states like Iowa, is not where the conservative base resides in large numbers. The Drive-By Media would love to destroy the conservative coalition. They would love to destroy the conservative base to the Republican Party. That’s why they are promoting Huckabee; it is why they are promoting McCain.

The Drive-By Media, ladies and gentlemen, will tell us each and every day who the true conservatives in the Republican primary are, and they will tell us by virtue of who they attack and also by virtue of who they prop up. They are propping up McCain; they are propping up Huckabee. The Drive-By Media hate conservatives. They want to destroy conservatism. It is the bulwark standing in their way of power and monopolistic control of all the apparatus of the country, government, media, and everything else. It’s one of the best indicators I can offer you. If you’re asking who is the genuine conservative out there or who is most conservative, who is most liberal on the Republican side, just take a look at who the Drive-Bys are enamored of and you will be able to answer the question yourself without me having to tell you. Why do you think that Senator McCain is making his big stand in New Hampshire? Because he did well there in 2000 and because he knows he runs really well with independents. He knows that New Hampshire is not a big conservative state.

If McCain were running on a genuine conservative agenda he’d be focusing on South Carolina for example, but he’s not. He’s focusing in New Hampshire because he thinks conservatives can be outnumbered there by this new influx of independents. You know, he’s up there in New Hampshire, if you listen to McCain, touting his left-wing environmental agenda with Joe Lieberman, for crying out loud. Now, recently there has been an endorsement that have people scratching their heads. “Jack Kemp, supply-sider, endorsing McCain? What’s this all about?” I’ll give you two reasons, and I’m just hazarding my own guess here, but I think it’s the old boys club in Washington, the inside the Beltway establishment apparatus, and the dirty little secret: Congressman Kemp is an open borders guy. So is Senator McCain. Have you noticed that in these forums and debates, McCain doesn’t want to talk about immigration; he doesn’t want to talk about campaign finance reform; he doesn’t want to talk about the things that genuinely rile conservatives? He wants to sweep those issues under the rug, and try to redefine what those issues were all about and what his position was on both of them.

Sphere: Related Content

From NewsBusters

During MSNBC’s live New Hampshire primary night coverage, former NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw warned that poll results getting ahead of the voters could turn the public against the media, but then blamed the inaccurate polling on how “people probably are not as honest with pollsters.” Chris Matthews, who urged an “inquest” on the polls which all had Barack Obama well ahead of Hillary Clinton in the Granite state when Clinton actually won, saw “an ethnic factor here.” Matthews extrapolated on his theory involving “Archie Bunker,” the bigoted 1970s TV character:I’ve always thought that pollers, people, pollsters who call people up and ask them how they’re going to vote, speak in perfect English, and standard English, they speak with a kind of a politically correct manner and it encourages a politically correct answer. I’ve often thought that if an Archie Bunker voice were to come over the phone, and ask people how they’re going to vote, you’d get a more honest answer.

During the 11pm EST hour, Brokaw warned: “I think that the people out there are going to begin to make judgments about us — if they haven’t already — if we don’t begin to temper that temptation to constantly try to get ahead of what the voters are deciding…” He soon, however, blamed the voters: “I think people probably are not as honest with pollsters when they get called anymore because they’re called constantly and they do change their minds. We’re in a culture now, Chris, in which attention spans are very short, which people make quick decisions and change them equally quickly.”

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content