VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY HILLARY COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘Religious nuts’ Category

Residents Angered by Group’s Distribution of Korans

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008


firepit.jpg
(Story Link) Some Houston residents are upset after Korans were left on the doorsteps of hundreds of homes in their neighborhood as part of a campaign to educate people about Islam.Residents of Braes Timbers in southwest Houston began finding the holy books two weeks ago, MyFOXHouston.com reported. The Korans came with a note saying they had been left by the Book of Signs Foundation, which claims to have distributed 30,000 free copies of the texts to residents throughout the city.

“If we went into a Muslim country and left a Bible, we would be in prison and then decapitated a few years later,”

Sue Ann Pieri, a resident who chose not to destroy the book, as other neighbors did, told.

DITTO Ms. Pieri!  

If someone left a fucken Koran on my doorstep I would immediately use it as kindling in my fire pit.
The easiest way for religious types regardless of religion to irritate yo boy Snoop is to shove your fucken religion and your way of thinking in my face and in this horrifying case to my doorstep!

Now on the other hand when Jehovah’s Witness folks use to slink around in my neighborhood I quickly got on their “do not visit” list because I would have some really poignant conversations with them. Just think of my blog commentary on steroids as I was particularly focused on making my true and honest feelings about them and their racist cult very clear.

Yes, I’m a cranky Negro bastard, Duh I know…

Sphere: Related Content

Phony Pflegerism

Friday, June 6th, 2008

1v.bmp

By George Neumayr at the American Spectator

The very left-wing Catholic clericalism from which Obama hopes to derive votes in the fall served as the pretext for his leaving the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Just as Jeremiah Wright’s over-the-top sermons could not have come as a surprise to Obama, so Father Michael Pfleger’s hyper-partisanship would have been known to him as well.

But Father Pfleger’s timing and choice of a target were poor: his antics hit the Internet just as the Wright furor had begun to dissipate and instead of attacking a Republican for racism he selected Hillary Clinton. Maybe at another moment in the campaign this wouldn’t have mattered — Geraldine Ferraro’s comments saying Obama had an unfair advantage due to race might have even lent the sermon some plausibility — but as Obama began his courting of Hillary’s support he found it all very annoying.

Yet normally the Democrats encourage priests and religious to misuse their office, to treat the binding teachings of their church as debatable while treating the platform and causes of the Democratic Party as doctrine; to put on their religious garb at political meetings, then take it off for catechesis.

The Drinans and Pflegers can’t muster up much enthusiasm for the magisterium of the Church but left-wing politics brings out their zeal. Disagree with Church teaching? That’s okay, they think.

But disagree with the Democratic Party’s specific proposals for this or that tricky, prudential issue on which reasonable people could disagree? That’s not. Dissenters inside the Church brook little dissent when it comes to left-wing politics.

READ THE REST HERE

Sphere: Related Content

Fried Squirrel Connoisseur on McCain’s VP Short List

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

More Republican Party lunacy. McCain I guess wants to present the old white fart and redneck as an alternate to anti-American faux Negro ticket.


huck6.jpg

Read the story at Hot Air

Sphere: Related Content

WTF!! McCain planning climate change tour

Friday, May 9th, 2008


retardmccain.JPG

From Examiner.com

Sen. John McCain really does want to tempt the Republican base. …We’ve gotten our hands on an advanced transcript of this weekend’s “The Chris Matthews Show” on NBC and the British Broadcasting Corporation’s Katty Kay offered this nugget during the show’s “Tell Me Something I Don’t Know” segment:

    “John McCain is going to be doing more of these themed tours of America, and one of them is going to be on energy and global climate change. It could get him into trouble with Republicans, of course, and with the base, who don’t think there is much climate change going on, but it is something that he’s very passionate about and he’s going to be talking about it.”

Sphere: Related Content

Apparently being a retarded negro, racist, Anti-American, Jew hating, Garlic nose dissing SOB can bring in the bling!

Thursday, March 27th, 2008

Found this on Gateway Pundit

Being an anti-American racist minister has its perks.
wrighthome.jpg

Rev. Jeremiah Wright is about to roost in a 10,340 square foor $1.6 million dollar home.
FOX News reported:

FOX News has uncovered documents that indicate Wright is about to move to a 10,340-square-foot, four-bedroom home in suburban Chicago, currently under construction in a gated community.

While it is not uncommon for an accomplished clergyman to live in luxury, Wright’s retirement residence is raising some questions.

“Some people think deals like this are hypocritical. Jeremiah Wright himself criticizes people from the pulpit for middle classism, for too much materialism,” said Andrew Walsh, Associate Director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life with Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.

“So he’s entitled to be tweaked here. So the question really is, how unusual is this? Somewhat unusual,” he said.

****

I’m shocked and very disappointed in you white people. How could you people have missed “Retard” J. Wright being able to afford a $1.6 million dollar home!

I though you “rich white people” were in control of this shit. Negros are not suppose to live such a lofty lifestyle. And this man was open about his disdain for American greediness and opulence.
Why was his phone not tapped? How come his tax records were not investigated?

Snoop and Uncle Ruckus are not amused!!!!

Could the police not pull this man over and Rodney King his sorry ass and beat the racist hatred out of him to keep him in check?

Sphere: Related Content

Recycle or go to Hell, warns Vatican

Monday, March 10th, 2008

Failing to recycle plastic bags could find you spending eternity in Hell, the Vatican said after drawing up a list of seven deadly sins for our times.


no_bullshit.jpg

MORE OF THIS CRAZY SHIT HERE!

Sphere: Related Content

Vatican lists “new sins,” including pollution

Monday, March 10th, 2008


sins1.jpg

VATICAN CITY (Reuters - via Drudge) - Thou shall not pollute the Earth. Thou shall beware genetic manipulation. Modern times bring with them modern sins. So the Vatican has told the faithful that they should be aware of “new” sins such as causing environmental blight.The guidance came at the weekend when Archbishop Gianfranco Girotti, the Vatican’s number two man in the sometimes murky area of sins and penance, spoke of modern evils.

Asked what he believed were today’s “new sins,” he told the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano that the greatest danger zone for the modern soul was the largely uncharted world of bioethics.

“(Within bioethics) there are areas where we absolutely must denounce some violations of the fundamental rights of human nature through experiments and genetic manipulation whose outcome is difficult to predict and control,” he said.

The Vatican opposes stem cell research that involves destruction of embryos and has warned against the prospect of human cloning.

Girotti, in an interview headlined “New Forms of Social Sin,” also listed “ecological” offences as modern evils.

In recent months, Pope Benedict has made several strong appeals for the protection of the environment, saying issues such as climate change had become gravely important for the entire human race.

Under Benedict and his predecessor John Paul, the Vatican has become progressively “green”.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

The Cruise Indoctrination Video Scientology Tried To Suppress

Thursday, January 17th, 2008


Crazy Bastard!!
 cruise.jpg

This is from the website Gawker

You have to watch this video. It shows Tom Cruise, with all the wide-eyed fervor that he brings to the promotion of a movie, making the argument for Scientology, the bizarre 20th-century religion. Making the argument is an understatement. The Hollywood actor, star of movies such as Mission Impossible, is a complete fanatic. “When you’re a Scientologist, and you drive by an accident, you know you have to do something about it, because you know you’re the only one who can really help… We are the way to happiness. We can bring peace and unite cultures.” There’s much much more. Let me put it this way: if Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah’s couch was an 8 on the scale of scary, this is a 10.

Click here to view video, the clip was pulled from You Tube

Sphere: Related Content

“Republicans” seem to me to be increasingly devoid of common sense

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

mccain3.jpgFolks I hope those of you who come a peep my little blog realize one thing, one of the main reasons I blog is for my own educational purposes.
This blog is hardly viewed by nor will it ever be viewed by enough people for it to be “influential” or relevant.
I am an obsessive blog reader, I have said countless times I love my homies on the right, even those with whom I may not agree with on every topic mainly because they are truly educated in the world of politics and most are passionate.

I am really pissed off this morning, partly because I’m a bit cranky since I have been on Mrs. Snoops South Beach diet. I am munching on celery, cherry tomatoes and cottage cheese for breakfast. She says the first two weeks are the hardest, it’s true. I have not had ANY alcohol in almost 3 weeks, no joke. Anywho, Snoop, anger… aimed at so-called Republicans. I usually keep the TV on in my office and I watch the pundit gab fests as background noise and I constantly get pissed at all of the networks including Fox who continue to prop up these fraud ass Republicans and intentionally leave Fred out of the election conversation and it has worked.

I listened to several radio talk shows, (not Rush, he was out yesterday) and the phone lines were filled with “republicans” saying that they did not know ANYTHING about Fred Thompson, and how he has failed to articulate his views on issues.
Forget abut Fred for a minute here, my problem is with these so called Republicans, bunch of old dumb ass ignorant fucks who continue to be so easily swayed by these jackass GOP phonies while at the same time say that “while I was excited about the possibility of a Thompson campaign, he just has not shown me anything.” What the fuck is he suppose to show you, does dude got to dance on his damm head and do magic tricks to get noticed?

rudyforpresident.jpgI’ve got to give it up to Ron Paul fans, although dude is frankly a political train wreck, his peeps got the word out about him and has forced people to pay some attention to him.
I won’t mention Paul’s treasure chest of issues including his racist past that his fans refuse to acknowledge.
But hey, dude got 7 percent of the vote last night, major props.
Libertarians should back their own, guy and they did it.
However the Republicans, at least the people I hear bitching and moaning are infinitely clueless.
At least the Democrats have a choice between liberal candidates’ number one, number two and number three, while the Republican field is being led by a bunch of closet liberal Democrat flunkies.
I’m angry at the party, and feel that the Republican Party is in deep trouble. I was sent another Republican Party questionnaire and this contribution form, I would not send the GOP a fucken dime, I need to even stop referring to myself as a Republican.
I understand that New Hampshire was not going to be competitive for Fred, but for him to get one fucken percent of the vote is just retarded beyond belief.

Rush talks about this scenario and I totally understand, I really get it, but my hopes for Fred are fading, not for him as a candidate, but that so-called Republicans either too stupid, or increasingly vulnerable to TV pundit yammering and are just too damm lazy to understand the difference between these candidates.
Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter two rock solid, plain spoken individuals without a hint of leftist pandering are nowhere to be found in the conversation, except for most of these politically educated right leaning blogs their message is obviously over most “so-called” Republicans heads.

Folks I would have not problem with people saying to me, I have studied all of the issues and looked at all of the candidates equally but I support candidate A.
But that is not what “Republicans” are doing and saying, they are claiming ignorance, something the party and it’s peeps are showcasing more and more each day.



RUSH: Now, I want to remind all my Republican friends that there are many states after Iowa and New romneyvane.jpgHampshire where the Republican populations are far more indicative of the conservative base, and to get caught up in what happened in Iowa, to get caught up in what’s going to happen in New Hampshire as though they’re the only two states that matter and that they’re going to determine the fallout on both parties is a little bit over the top.Iowa is a caucus; it’s a weird setup. New Hampshire allows independents to vote in the Republican primary, which is why McCain is doing as well as he is doing, and it’s why the media want this to be a bellwether against Romney. I mean, Pat Buchanan came in second. He came in a very strong second in New Hampshire in 1992. Now, I’m not saying that these contests are not to be taken seriously here, and that they’re not to be fought and to be won, but we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. New Hampshire is no longer the conservative barometer it used to be. The state has changed, it is now quite liberal. A lot of people who used to live in Massachusetts have moved into New Hampshire to escape New Hampshire’s high taxation and other problems. New England generally the northern states, states like Iowa, is not where the conservative base resides in large numbers. The Drive-By Media would love to destroy the conservative coalition. They would love to destroy the conservative base to the Republican Party. That’s why they are promoting Huckabee; it is why they are promoting McCain.

The Drive-By Media, ladies and gentlemen, will tell us each and every day who the true conservatives in the Republican primary are, and they will tell us by virtue of who they attack and also by virtue of who they prop up. They are propping up McCain; they are propping up Huckabee. The Drive-By Media hate conservatives. They want to destroy conservatism. It is the bulwark standing in their way of power and monopolistic control of all the apparatus of the country, government, media, and everything else. It’s one of the best indicators I can offer you. If you’re asking who is the genuine conservative out there or who is most conservative, who is most liberal on the Republican side, just take a look at who the Drive-Bys are enamored of and you will be able to answer the question yourself without me having to tell you. Why do you think that Senator McCain is making his big stand in New Hampshire? Because he did well there in 2000 and because he knows he runs really well with independents. He knows that New Hampshire is not a big conservative state.

jesterhuck.jpgIf McCain were running on a genuine conservative agenda he’d be focusing on South Carolina for example, but he’s not. He’s focusing in New Hampshire because he thinks conservatives can be outnumbered there by this new influx of independents. You know, he’s up there in New Hampshire, if you listen to McCain, touting his left-wing environmental agenda with Joe Lieberman, for crying out loud. Now, recently there has been an endorsement that have people scratching their heads. “Jack Kemp, supply-sider, endorsing McCain? What’s this all about?” I’ll give you two reasons, and I’m just hazarding my own guess here, but I think it’s the old boys club in Washington, the inside the Beltway establishment apparatus, and the dirty little secret: Congressman Kemp is an open borders guy. So is Senator McCain. Have you noticed that in these forums and debates, McCain doesn’t want to talk about immigration; he doesn’t want to talk about campaign finance reform; he doesn’t want to talk about the things that genuinely rile conservatives? He wants to sweep those issues under the rug, and try to redefine what those issues were all about and what his position was on both of them.

Sphere: Related Content

An Open Letter - From VodkaPundit, funny

Friday, January 4th, 2008

iowa.jpg

Dear Iowa Republicans,I’ll put this in language even your tiny little Iowa brains can understand: What the f*** is wrong with you people?

The news coming out of Des Moines (literally, French for “tell me about the rabbits, George”) tonight is distressing in the extreme. 32 years ago, your Democratic brethren took one look at Jimmy Carter — the worst 20th Century President bar Nixon, and the worst ex-President ever — and declared, “That’s our man!”

Three decades later, and along comes Mike Huckabee. Same moral pretentiousness, same gullibility on foreign affairs, only-slightly-less toothy idiot’s grin. Then you so-called Republicans took a look at Carter’s clone and said, “That’s our man, too!”

And by a pretty wide margin.

I’ll give you some credit where it’s due: you guys had sense enough to give Fred Thompson a breather, and Ron Paul a pretty solid kick in the (ahem) nuts. But Mike Huckabee? Really? We’ve seen this game before, and its name is… every other single stupid, un-winnable candidate you’ve ever picked — which is most of them.

So I repeat the question: What is wrong with you people?

All my love, you corn-sucking idiots,

VodkaPundit

PS You’re making Iowa Democrats look like Albert freakin’ Einstein. How’s that feel?

DITTO!!!!

Sphere: Related Content

Identity Politics and more Suckabee

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008


jesuspalshuck.jpg

I’m listening to Rush as usual and my head hurts listening to this one caller who claims that he is undecided as to what GOP candidate to endorse.
Then dude eventually comes clean and says that he supports Suckabee because he is the “most” conservative. He then says later that Giuliani would be a good alternative.

Now I understand that people are willing to go to great lengths to give props to their candidate of choice and even flat out lie about his or her credentials.
However those of you who claim to be Republicans and yet support the obvious liberal tendencies of a candidate like Suckabee or Romney, shit even John McCain is amazing to me.
I have said prior, it’s not like you can’t go to You Tube and listen to what these candidates have said before or read prior articles on legislative action taken by these individuals while they occupied former offices. You can go to countless websites and see specifically the records that many of the GOP candidates try to conceal or misrepresent.

Despite all of that, I hear to way too many callers talk shows, (exceedingly funny when they try to pull this bullshit on Rush), trying to redefine what conservatism really means and moving solid benchmarks that should be required of any good solid GOP candidate.

As Rush and countless other political pundits have pointed out, but Rush in particular, Republican candidates need not pander to the left to win elections.
Kissing the collective asses of liberal Democrats is not what any TRUE Republican candidate for president should be doing.

The fact that I keep reading and hearing supposedly Republican voters pimping for the likes of Suckabee, the lying fraud Romney and a cross dressing Rudy is somewhat disturbing.
Maybe these campaigns have adopted the guerrilla tactics of Ron Paul supporters and have been instructed to manipulate poll numbers, frequently call talk shows, write letters to the editor, spam websites and blogs completely ignoring the essential substance of their candidate of choice.

Here is a portion of a transcript of Rush’s show where he talks about “Identity Politics”
particularly talking about Sucakbee and his followers.
Basically tard Christian types who think that just because Suckabee is this former preacher man that he must be the “God” candidate. I can here the redneck accents as I type this, “I support Huckabee because he is an Evangelical Christian”
(remember to say that in your best hillbilly voice)
Never mind his actual record and the fact that well….Suckabee is a closet liberal tard!
Note to you die hard people pimping the fact that Suckabee was a former preacher and “man of God”, look I have several former classmates who back in the day said point blank that they were going to be preachers because of the money they could make.
Yes all are now pretty successful preachers, one pimping parishioners in one of the oldest and most prominent churches in Alabama.
The only difference between them and yours truly is I much rather play Xbox and chill than eying the collection plates while “entertaining” folks on Sundays.
That is what frankly way too many shyster bible wavers engage in. Suckabee has just chosen to take his carnival road show into politics.
It worked in coning the people of Arkansas; I just hope that the American people won’t get screwed into supporting another man from… Hope?

RUSH: Okay, folks, let me tell you what’s going on now. I sadly, and unfortunately, must make this point reacting to our last caller. What we have going on here is identity politics, I think, in a large swath of support for Governor Huckabee. Identity politics is what the left does. Do you know what I mean when I say “identity politics,” Rachel? Okay.

Identity politics is: You vote for the Christian. You vote for the black. You vote for the woman. This is traditionally how the left looks at people. We, as conservatives, don’t. We don’t see you, for example, in a political sense, and see a woman first. We might see a woman first because you’re beautiful, but we’re men and we can’t help it. In a political sense, we wouldn’t say, “You don’t qualify. You’re not smart because you’re a woman,” and we wouldn’t say you deserve anything special because you’re a woman. We wouldn’t look at a black and say, “Oh! Poor, disadvantaged, slavery heritage, presidential material!” without knowing anything about the guy.

We wouldn’t if there was the first admittedly open gay running, we wouldn’t say, “Oh, terribly discriminated against, really has had no chance! We’re going to vote for the gay guy because it makes us feel better about ourselves.”That’s identity politics, or a little strain of it, and that’s what’s happening in the Huckabee race. The identity of Huckabee is: “Christian, Southern Baptist minister,” and that identity is covering and is being translated by supporters as meaning whatever they want it to mean, as opposed to actually looking at how he’s governed. Like the pastor who just called and said Huckabee is a light at the end of the tunnel. Pastor, the light at the end of the tunnel is the oncoming train, and you can’t get off the track!

That’s the light at the end of the tunnel, and I think identity politics was a fundamental feature of the Perot campaign as well. People really didn’t even care what his policies were. He didn’t even have to articulate policies. Remember that? (classic Ross Perot impression) “I’ll tell you, Larry, here’s what we’re going to do! We’re going to get rid of all these 737s, going to hire a bunch of Lear 55s. We’re going to have smaller airplanes.” He cares so much! “You own this country! You own it. This is your country. We’re going to give this country back to you.” That’s identity politics, and this is traditionally not what conservatives and even Republicans, right-wingers, do.

Sphere: Related Content

Redefining Conservatism

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

rep.JPGDES MOINES, Iowa–Stepping out for a press conference here Monday, Mike Huckabee fielded the ultimate question. Just how conservative are you?”I’m as conservative as anyone could hope to be, or want to be, or needs to be,” replied the smiling former Arkansas governor, never missing a beat, and following up with a boilerplate summary of his belief in “lower taxes,” the “sanctity of human life” and a “strong military”–before moving ever so swiftly on to the next question.

It was trademark Huckabee: Sounds great, explains little. It’s a strategy that has so far served him well, rocketing his campaign in recent weeks to the top ranks of the Republican presidential field. The question is whether he can continue to pull off that trick, now that he’s receiving belated media scrutiny. A few days following the candidate on the Iowa campaign trail suggests it could prove tough. If Mr. Huckabee does turn out to be everything Republicans “want” or “need” in a conservative, it will only be because the definition of a conservative has morphed to include tax hiking, protectionism, corporate scolding and an unserious approach to foreign policy.

What aren’t in doubt are Mr. Huckabee’s social-values credentials. He has an undisputed record on questions of abortion and gay marriage, and he’s spent no small portion of his limited advertising money making sure Iowa voters know it. Christian conservatives make up an estimated 40% of the state’s GOP vote, and by all accounts he’s slowly locking up that vote. That alone accounts for a fair share of his recent rise in the polls.

Mr. Huckabee is the charisma candidate. Like another man from Hope, Ark., the onetime pastor is an extraordinary speaker. He’s self-deprecating and funny, has perfect timing, and never struggles for an answer. He has that rare ability to pull out just the right story in response to any situation, and to deliver it in a folksy, Southern way.

Read the rest of this article here, but let me first just say this; Folks I’m angry, as angry as someone can be on Lexapro, and drinking Irish Cream on the rocks at 9:00a.m.
As this piece points out we are allowing people to redefine conservatism, this article focuses on Huck but the same can be said for 3 faux Republicans and what is worse far too many of you are allowing it.

As of today, December 18, 2007 I still have the utmost confidence that Fred Thompson will be the Republican Party’s nominee for President of the United States.
One reason why I believe that is because the major networks are completely ignoring him. Snoop WTF? I’ll explain.
Virtually every pundit on Fox goes out of their way to dismiss him and call him irrelevant. Republican pundits on interviews won’t even mention him.
I have even heard a couple of Democratic strategist say if he does not win South Carolina he will be out of the race.
Ask yourself this, if Fred Thompson’s campaign is in its final days, they why go out of your way to mention that?
Basically the media and the pundits are working awfully hard to discredit “an irrelevant” candidate.

Lets get real here; the Democrats do not want to run against Thompson, because he is not a closet liberal, because he has never advocated for big government, opening our boarders to illegal immigrants, reducing our military, backing away from the war against Islamic terrorist pimps, granting clemency to murderers and the list goes on.
He is not flashy, not a smooth talker, he looks like a worn out grandpa on most days, has this annoying clearing of the throat thingy he does, and dude needs to STILL get some good designer to have his suites tailored to fit him better.
But most of all I respect and admire an individual who is one of the Thompson’s campaigns most important individuals. I have said this before and I will say again, he has said to me that Thompson is a good man and a sincere man and could make a great president. He believes in him. From this individual, that is enough for me.

Every Republican pundit pulling for one of the three frauds dismisses him, because they want to avoid the conservative comparisons.
My anger comes from the people who claim to be Republican and some TV and blog pundits who proclaim themselves to be on the “conservative” bandwagon touting the faux conservative credentials of candidates like Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Giuliani? What the fuck are you people drinking in the morning?

We need to stop trying to redefine conservatism, maybe some of you need to go back and understand what that actually means.
If you people who have given your support to these frauds don’t wake up this party will be on the outside looking in the next 8 plus years, because you allowed fictitious poll numbers, Sunday morning Baptist preaching rhetoric, New York shyster slick talking points, and a lying ass LDS fraud to redefine conservatism.

Unlike a great number of bloggers and pundits who pimp for these campaigns, I’m not in Thompson’s pocket, I’m not paid to put a bunch of banner bullshit on my site, I don’t work for his campaign, not a family member, a friend from back in the day, has never been invited to interview or spend time with a candidate, I don’t have exclusive access to a campaign, never been invited to a campaign rally or party, not a pimp for the Republican Party.
Not paid to post my opinions on my blog or any other blog, do not receive one dime of money from blogging.
I do it because I love blogging, I have fun doing it, and I love to share my opinions. What you read and see is what I am.

If Fred does not get the nomination, the world will not end, I will be greatly disappointed, and I will be forced to support one of these frauds.
The only thing I can hope for is a Republican majority in one or both of the chambers.
Hopefully some Republican discipline will be administered.
Bottom line I’m just a brotha tryin’ to make sense of this campaign bullshit and seriously is not liking what he is seeing.

Sphere: Related Content

Old Huck pimping his constituents, gettin that bling, bling

Friday, December 14th, 2007

huckpimp.jpgHuckabee took thousands in gifts, records show·

Presents belie humble image of former governor

· Businessman was donor to presidential frontrunner

A $1,000 pair of cufflinks from a supporter, tens of thousands of dollars of clothing from a wealthy Little Rock businessman and thousands in gift certificates and cash from staff and appointees were among the lavish gifts given to Republican presidential candidate and unexpected frontrunner Mike Huckabee while he was governor of Arkansas.
The gifts fell within Arkansas’s ethics rules but have raised questions among the governor’s political opponents and ethics analysts at a time when scrutiny of the candidate is intensifying, and are at odds with the humble persona Huckabee has adopted on the campaign trail.

A review of state records by the Guardian indicates that during his more than 10 years as governor, Huckabee received thousands of dollars in presents almost every year: gift certificates to sporting goods stores, clothing boutiques and Wal-Mart, a $3,695 pair of cowboy boots, a $500 belt and more.

In addition, some former Huckabee staff and appointees acknowledged to the Guardian that Huckabee’s chief of staff and a cabinet official solicited contributions from staff and appointees for Christmas gifts for the governor.

Huckabee’s chief source of largesse was Jennings Osborne, a Little Rock businessman who made his money in the medical testing business. In 1996, Huckabee’s first year as governor, Osborne bought furniture for the governor’s office and a fountain pen for the governor’s use, and regularly sent flower arrangements. In subsequent years Osborne bought Huckabee gift certificates to department stores and clothing boutiques, 200 copies of a book Huckabee wrote, ties, flowers and air travel.

There is more here, but you get the point. Honest humble Baptist preacher my ass.
Baptist preachers are some of the biggest pimps around.

Sphere: Related Content

Huckabee: The Intolerant Christian

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

jesuspalshuck.jpgThis from Riehl World View

Believe it or not, this latest on Huckabee can actually be used to shed light on the Dumond affair and his clemency issues. Think about it.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, asks in an upcoming article, “Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?”

Via Powerline we now know that Huckabee was aware of the impassioned pleadings of several victims of Dumond, yet his heart was not moved, someone involved claimed he was actually arrogant about it. And we also now know that his rationale for abetting the release of a convicted serial rapist and murderer was that said rapist had a jail house conversion.

The file contains 12 letters written by eight different women, three of whom reported being raped or sexually assaulted by Dumond.

What this all suggests is that Huckabee is a you’re with me, or against me type of guy. And the only way to be with Huckabee is to be born again. That may be fine for someone in their private affairs. It is unacceptable for a man seeking to lead a nation comprised of so many different faiths.
The final piece of evidence is the increasing number of revelations as regards his intolerant remarks regarding homosexuals.

Huckabee may be a Christian, but he is far from a tolerant man. And this diverse nation cannot afford such as its President. It simply can’t.

While you’re there also check out: Hillary: Bill???? - Huckabee Finally Mis-speaks?

Sphere: Related Content

Minister says Scientologists seek power in Germany

Tuesday, December 11th, 2007
BERLIN (Reuters) - German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble launched a verbal assault against the Church of Scientology on Sunday, accusing it in a newspaper interview of trying to secure political power and influence in Germany.

A spokeswoman for Scientology in Germany dismissed Schaeuble’s allegations as “insane”.

Schaeuble and the country’s 16 state interior ministers declared Scientology unconstitutional on Friday, opening the way for a possible ban on the organisation.

“Scientology is also working in Germany to secure political power and influence,” Schaeuble said in an interview with Bild am Sonntag newspaper published on Sunday.

“Fundamental rights, including human rights, like the right to equal treatment and human dignity are limited or abrogated. The democratic system is rejected,” he said.

Schaeuble was referring to the spiritual movement founded in 1953 by U.S. science fiction author L. Ron Hubbard.

Schaeuble and his state counterparts said Germany’s domestic intelligence agencies should continue gathering information on the legality of Scientology’s activities in Germany so that a decision could be made about a possible ban next year.

But German intelligence agencies have been closely monitoring Scientology’s operations for a decade and see little hope of amassing sufficient evidence to justify a ban, Der Spiegel magazine reported in its latest issue.

Germany does not recognise Scientology as a religion and regard it as a cult masquerading as a church to make money.

Read the rest, but why bother, Now I’m a guy who believes in freedom of religion, and maybe Germany is overreacting a bit, but any reasonable individual with a smidgen of common sense know damm well that Scientology is a bunch of lunatic made up bullshit cult crap and one of the most elaborate “religious” scams going.

The fact that people would actually gravitate to this bullshit cult just goes to show you how desperate people are to find comfort in a “god” higher power, spiritual awareness whatever, to mask the pain, emptiness, confusion that goes on in their daily lives.

The fact that idiot wealthy Hollywood types are the most prominent pimps of this cult should raise some serious red flags.

Today Show clip on the topic


Sphere: Related Content

More Crazy Huck

Tuesday, December 11th, 2007

From Hot Air Folks, there is a reason why the polls have Crazy Huck in the lead, the MSM is begging that this dude is the Republican nominee.
Some may remember a post where I said many months ago that a prominent blogger told me that Huckabee will become a force in the race, until his liberal government issues and crazy bible thumping rhetoric become public.
This dude said, don’t trust him, he is a nut!
Everything this dude said, even the fact that he will at some point lead in the polls is coming true, it’s almost scary.

Yesterday, Gov. Huckabee admitted that as governor of Arkansas, and indeed because he was governor of Arkansas, he didn’t know much about the decades-long cold war between the United States and Cuba. He wanted the trade embargo on Cuba lifted so that Arkansas could sell rice to Castro’s island prison. Huckabee didn’t seem to be aware of just how bad what he said sounded, that it made him sound ignorant and unqualified for the job he’s currently pursuing. Surely he does remember hearing about Elian Gonzalez, sent back to Castro’s Cuba by Huckabee’s fellow Arkansan, Bill Clinton? The Mareil boatlift? The Cuban Missile Crisis? The Spanish-American War?They do have schools in Arkansas, right? These schools do teach history? Mike Huckabee attended school and learned history at some point in his life? Then there is no excuse for him not to know about the decades-long and continuing cold war between the US and Cuba. No excuse at all.And there is also no excuse for him to flip flop on Cuba just because he’s running for president. His answer regarding this question last night on Hannity & Colmes is refreshingly honest, yet clueless.


Sphere: Related Content

Christian Conservatives Consider Third-Party Effort

Monday, October 1st, 2007

rudy3.jpgAlarmed at the chance that the Republican party might pick Rudolph Giuliani as its presidential nominee despite his support for abortion rights, a coalition of influential Christian conservatives is threatening to back a third-party candidate in an attempt to stop him.The group making the threat, which came together Saturday in Salt Lake City during a break-away gathering during a meeting of the secretive Council for National Policy, includes Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, who is perhaps the most influential of the group, as well as Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, the direct mail pioneer Richard Viguerie and dozens of other politically-oriented conservative Christians, participants said. Almost everyone present expressed support for a written resolution that “if the Republican Party nominates a pro-abortion candidate we will consider running a third party candidate.”
The participants spoke on condition of anonymity because the both the Council for National Policy and the smaller meeting were secret, but they said members of the intend to publicize its resolution. These participants said the group chose the qualified term “consider” because they have not yet identified an alternative third party candidate, but the group was largely united in its plans to bolt the party if Mr. Giuliani became the candidate.

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

Bishop accused in beating blames Satan for his woes

Monday, August 27th, 2007

I don’t particularly give a shit about these people. I however always find it amusing when religious scamster types get into trouble they always blame that “Satan” dude.
Seems to me that particular excuse would be played out by now.

satansouthpark.jpg

(Link) Bishop Thomas Weeks III, now charged with beating his estranged wife, the nationally known evangelist Juanita Bynum.Members of Global Destiny Church in Duluth urged people to cautious about taking sides in the dispute between Bishop Thomas Weeks III and his wife, Juanita Bynum.

Most congregants approached for interviews after Sunday’s 8 a.m. service declined to comment on the marital problems of Weeks, 40, and Bynum, 48.

Those who did urged caution in taking sides in the issue and passing judgment on two people they consider spiritual giants, but also human.

“There are three sides to every story,” said Clarkston’s Shannon Mayers, a frequent visitor. “Nobody has the right to judge anybody. God is in the midst of that and will work it out.”

Member Maurice Adams, 26, of Atlanta said he was disappointed to hear the news but still considers Weeks his bishop.

“We all make mistakes. He deserves another opportunity,” Adams said. “I’m hurt, but I do respect him for being man enough to show his face today.”

Weeks took the pulpit two days after his surrender to authorities in connection with the alleged attack on Bynum. His remarks included appreciation for the prayers and support that he said have come in for him and his wife and thanks to those in attendance in spite of the controversy.

Weeks sparked thunderous applause and cheers when he asked members to tell those seated next to them: “We’ve got certain things going on right now, but I refuse to stop coming to the house God built.”

Weeks, wearing a dark suit and his customary bow tie, blamed the devil for the accusation that has him facing two felony charges. He didn’t, however, offer any specifics before introducing a guest minister who preached in his stead, then exiting the room.

The bishop is charged with aggravated assault for allegedly choking, kicking and hitting Bynum on Tuesday night in a parking lot at the Renaissance Concourse Hotel and with making terroristic threats to kill her. Both are felonies.

After turning himself in, he spent six hours in the Fulton County Jail before being released on $40,000 bond Friday.

The couple reportedly met at the Renaissance to talk about reconciliation after having been separated for several months.

Bynum, known for her fiery sermons that empower women, has been in seclusion since the attack and was not present at Sunday’s 8 a.m. service.

Sphere: Related Content

Dutch Roman Catholic bishop: For the sake of harmony, let’s call God “Allah”

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

allahvsgod.jpg

Found on Sister Toldjah

Via Fox News:

A proposal by a Roman Catholic bishop in the Netherlands that people of all faiths refer to God as “Allah” is not sitting well with the Catholic community.

Tiny Muskens, an outgoing bishop who is retiring in a few weeks from the southern diocese of Breda, said God doesn’t care what he is called.

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn’t we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? … What does God care what we call him? It is our problem,” Muskens told Dutch television.

“I’m sure his intentions are good but his theology needs a little fine-tuning,” said Father Jonathan Morris, a Roman Catholic priest based in Rome. Morris, a news analyst for FOX News Channel, also called the idea impractical.

“Words and names mean things,” Morris said. “Referring to God as Allah means something.”

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington, D.C.-based Islamic civil liberties and advocacy group, backs the idea as a way to help interfaith understanding.

“It reinforces the fact that Muslims, Christians and Jews all worship the same God,” Hooper told FOXNews.com. “I don’t think the name is as important as the belief in God and following God’s moral principles. I think that’s true for all faiths.”

Much more here

Sphere: Related Content

L.A. Archdiocese to Pay $600M to Victims

Saturday, July 14th, 2007

priestsgonewild.jpgLOS ANGELES (AP) - The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles will settle its clergy abuse cases for at least $600 million, by far the largest payout in the church’s sexual abuse scandal, The Associated Press learned Saturday.Attorneys for the archdiocese and alleged victims are expected to announce the deal Monday, the day the first of more than 500 clergy abuse cases was scheduled for jury selection, according to two people with knowledge of the agreement. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the settlement had not been made public.

The archdiocese and its insurers will pay between $600 million and $650 million to about 500 plaintiffs—an average of $1.2 to $1.3 million per person. The settlement also calls for the release of confidential priest personnel files after review by a judge assigned to oversee the litigation, the sources said.

It wasn’t immediately clear how the payout would be split between the insurers, the archdiocese and several Roman Catholic religious orders. A judge must sign off on the agreement, and final details were being ironed out over the weekend.

Tod Tamberg, an archdiocese spokesman, did not immediately return a call for comment.

The settlement would be the largest ever by a Roman Catholic archdiocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002.

Among the largest total payouts was $100 million in 2004 by the Diocese of Orange, Calif., to settle 90 claims. The Diocese of Covington, Ky., last year agreed to pay $84 million for 552 cases. Facing a flood of abuse claims, five dioceses—Tucson, Ariz.; Spokane, Wash.; Portland, Ore.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego—sought bankruptcy protection.

Last month, the Archdiocese of Portland agreed to pay about $52 million to 175 victims, while setting aside another $20 million for anyone who comes forward in the future.

The Diocese of Spokane, Wash., also recently emerged from bankruptcy protection after agreeing to pay $48 million to settle about 150 claims.

Sphere: Related Content

Lindsey Graham On South Carolina Bigots

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

From Right Wing News
object width=”425″ height=”350″>

Opinion: How Falwell resembled Farrakhan

Tuesday, May 22nd, 2007
falwell.gifBy Clarence Page The Detroit News  Speak not ill of the dead. That’s easy advice to follow until you are remembering those who spoke a lot of ill while they were alive.

Yes, I am talking about the late Rev. Jerry Falwell.

The founder of the Moral Majority was found dead last Tuesday at age 73 in his Lynchburg, Va., office. Reports that his heart had failed were greeted with grim irony by those who thought it had failed years earlier.

This, after all, is the preacher who declared back in the 1980s that, “AIDS is the wrath of a just God against homosexuals.”

Of “feminists and all these radical gals,” he scoffed, “These women just need a man in the house. That’s all they need.”

After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, he said on Pat Robertson’s “The 700 Club” that, “The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this, because God will not be mocked.”

During South African Bishop Desmond Tutu’s rise as an antiapartheid leader, Falwell said, “I think he’s a phony, period, as far as representing the black people of South Africa.”

On Islam, “I think Mohammed was a terrorist.”

And the bleats go on.

Falwell was the sort of newsmaker who kept us wondering what he would say next, if only to find out whether it was nuttier than what he said in his previous eruption.

Yet although he may have said nutty things from time to time, he wasn’t nuts. He backed away from his imprudent Sept. 11 remarks, for example, when many of his fellow social conservatives thought he had gone too far.

And on those occasions when I encountered or interviewed him, Falwell seemed surprisingly friendly and gracious, compared to his bombastic TV image. After all, he did not build his Thomas Road Baptist Church into a megachurch with 24,000 members — plus Liberty University with 9,600 resident students and 17,250 distance-learning students — by acting like a grump or a goof. Even his fiercest adversaries learned better than to underestimate him.

In that sense his rise is instructive for students of politics, social movements and show business. He always had two Jerry Falwells to offer to the public. There were really two Jerry Falwells — one angelic, the other pugnacious. The face he presented to the public was whichever would do him the most good.

In that sense, I am stricken by his similarities to another conservative religious extremist I have known for more than two decades: Minister Louis Farrakhan.

At first glance, the Chicago-based Nation of Islam minister could hardly have less in common with the Lynchburg Baptist preacher. But look deeper. Farrakhan billed himself as “The Charmer” in his days as a calypso performer before he joined the Nation in the 1950s. And he can be quite charming in person or on the pulpit. Or he can sound like a hater, depending on whether he feels like making news.

Sen. John McCain touched on this ironic similarity during his 2000 presidential campaign. In a hot-blooded moment of candor that he later came to regret, he said, “Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance, whether they be Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left, or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right.”

Actually that’s not quite fair to Minister Farrakhan. He might be an agent of intolerance from time to time, but he does not belong on the left. The social, political and economic values of the 77-year-old Nation of Islam lines up remarkably close to those of Falwell’s conservatism. Both favor self-help, oppose big government and attract charges of thinly veiled bigotry toward other groups.
farra.jpg
Yet Farrakhan has never been invited to the White House and probably never will. Falwell became a featured visitor. McCain agreed to be last year’s commencement speaker at Falwell’s Liberty University. “Intolerance?” What intolerance? All is forgiven. This year’s speaker is former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who is considering a run for the Republican presidential nomination.

Actually McCain already did Falwell a big favor back in 2000. The senator made Falwell sound like someone who mattered. Falwell’s political influence had ebbed in recent years, partly because of his penchant for shooting from the lip. He was asked to address the Republican National Convention in 2000, but not again in 2004.

Yet if it is any consolation for those of us who seek a sensible political center, Minister Farrakhan’s brand of religious extremism seems to have limited appeal these days, too. He provided security for the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s first presidential campaign in 1984. But not many major candidates clamor to be photographed with him now.

If that means the politics of addition are rising up and the politics of division moving down, that’s a blessing for us all.

Sphere: Related Content

Video Captures Stoning of Kurdish Teenage Girl

Monday, May 7th, 2007

stoning.jpgThe video shows a 14-year-old girl being stoned to death by members of her own family! Her crime? She was in love with a Muslim boy. 

NOTE: One of commenter’s pointed out correctly that the girl and her attackers WERE NOT MUSLIM they were from a minority Kurdish religious group called Yezidi.

Yes Snoop tends to bash Muslims, many times deservedly so, but this is not the case.

This was suppose to be an Honor killing? There is anything honorable about this?

From Bortz:

“Listen very carefully today. Let’s hear how loud the cries of outrage and condemnation are from the Muslim community. Let’s all have another sip on our morning coffee while we wait for the Council on American-Islamic Relations to step forward and condemn this act of Islamic barbarism. Don’t wait too long. Your coffee will get cold.”

I know I know, if Bush did not invade Iraq……yada, yada.  

Mosul, Iraq — According to the Kurdish website Jebar.info up to 1000 men from the Yezidi Kurdish community of Mosul killed a teenager who’s only crime was running away to marry a Muslim man whom she loved and converting to his religion.

For four months the girl had been given shelter by a local Muslim Sheik. It was reported that in the last few days her family persuaded her to return home, convincing her that she had been forgiven by her parents and relatives for her mistake.

In a short mobile video clip which appears to have been taken by locals at seen of the murder, the girl is seen being ambushed on her way home by a group of up to 1000 men who were waiting for her to return; the men killed her in the most brutal way possible, by throwing large stones on her head. The following clips show that while she is alive and crying for help she is taunted and kicked in her stomach until someone finishes her off by throwing a large stone on her face.

Read more here  and here

Sphere: Related Content

Utah Republican Blames ‘The Devil’ For Immigration

Friday, April 27th, 2007

Yes I’m a Republican and as much as I hate posting this I can’t pass up idiot politicians regardless of the party affiliation, they are just so entertaining.

satan.gifIf you really want to blame someone for trying to destroy the United States, point the finger at… Satan?

The devil, Lucifer… whatever you want to call it, one Utah Republican says it is he who is trying to bring the USA down.

And Satan’s apparent weapon of choice: Allowing illegal immigrants to cross the border.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah County District 65 Chairman Don Larsen has submitted a formal resolution to oppose the devil’s plan to destroy the country — to be discussed this weekend at the Utah County Republican Convention.

“In order for Satan to establish his ‘New World Order’ and destroy the freedom of all people as predicted in the scriptures, he must first destroy the U.S.,” Larsen’s resolution states. “[It is] insidious for its stealth and innocuousness.”

Larsen’s proposal to defeat Satan? Close the borders to illegal immigrants to “prevent the destruction of the U.S. by stealth invasion.”

Shit, thanks dude get off the pipe!

Sphere: Related Content

Lutherans and Mighty Fortresses

Friday, December 1st, 2006

wall.jpg

 By Mark Tooley - The American Spectator

The 5 million member Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) recently hosted a conference in Berlin, Germany about sinister “walls.” The walls under examination were the former Berlin Wall, the security wall that Israel has constructed between itself and Palestinian territories, and the as of yet unbuilt partial wall to be erected along the U.S. southern border to inhibit illegal immigration.

“We insist that God calls us to be peacemakers,” explained ELCA missions executive Rev. Said R. Ailabouni. “We are committed to peace, not walls.” The conference was called “Mighty Fortresses and Mustard Seeds: Life in the Shadow of a Wall,” referencing, of course, Lutheranism’s flagship hymn: “A Mighty Fortress is our God.”

But in typical fashion for liberal Protestantism, which has largely forgotten the robust moral certitude of “Mighty Fortress” author Martin Luther, the conference was befuddled over any moral distinctions among these very different walls.

The Berlin Wall for nearly 30 years incarcerated East Berliners who chaffed under Communism. But liberal Protestantism, during almost all of those years, had little to nothing to say about that wall. At most, church liberals saw the wall at the time as merely a tragic symbol of misunderstanding and mistrust between East and West.

Only since the Berlin Wall fell have mainline church liberals, Lutheran or otherwise, been more willing to acknowledge the unpleasantness of Soviet-imposed Communism. In recent years, the Berlin Wall has become a useful metaphorical tool for condemning the Israeli security barrier and, even more recently, for assailing a security barrier along the southern U.S. border.

The moral distinctions among these walls should be obvious. The Berlin Wall was built by an oppressive government determine to imprison its own citizens. The Israeli security wall is intended to block Palestinian suicide bombers. The U.S. security barrier is meant to minimize the inflow of illegal immigrants. There is tragedy involved with each wall. But the intent behind the Israeli and U.S. walls is protection, not imprisonment of citizens. The Lutherans meeting in Berlin were nonetheless painfully disturbed and confused.

Read the rest at the American Spectator

Sphere: Related Content

Rep. Harris: Church-state separation ‘a lie’

Tuesday, August 29th, 2006

harris.jpgMIAMI, Florida (AP) — U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris told a religious journal that separation of church and state is “a lie” and God and the nation’s founding fathers did not intend the country be “a nation of secular laws.”
The Republican candidate for U.S. Senate also said that if Christians are not elected, politicians will “legislate sin,” including abortion and gay marriage.
Harris made the comments — which she clarified Saturday — in the Florida Baptist Witness, the weekly journal of the Florida Baptist State Convention, which interviewed political candidates and asked them about religion and their positions on issues.
Separation of church and state is “a lie we have been told,” Harris said in the interview, published Thursday, saying separating religion and politics is “wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers.”
Electing non-Christians allows ‘legislating sin’
“If you’re not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin,” Harris said.
Her comments drew criticism, including some from fellow Republicans, who called them offensive and not representative of the party.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, who is Jewish, told the Orlando Sentinel that she was “disgusted” by the comments.
Harris’ campaign released a statement Saturday saying she had been “speaking to a Christian audience, addressing a common misperception that people of faith should not be actively involved in government.”
The comments reflected “her deep grounding in Judeo-Christian values,” the statement said, adding that Harris had previously supported pro-Israel legislation and legislation recognizing the Holocaust.
Harris’ opponents in the GOP primary also gave interviews to the Florida Baptist Witness but made more general statements on their faith.
Harris, 49, faced widespread criticism for her role overseeing the 2000 presidential recount as Florida’s secretary of state.
State GOP leaders — including Gov. Jeb Bush — don’t think she can win against Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson in November. Fundraising has lagged, frustrated campaign workers have defected in droves and the issues have been overshadowed by news of her dealings with a corrupt defense contractor who gave her $32,000 in illegal campaign contributions.

Sphere: Related Content

Church Fires Teacher for Being A Woman

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006

buddyjesus.jpgThe minister of a church that dismissed a female Sunday School teacher after adopting what it called a literal interpretation of the Bible says a woman can perform any job outside of the church.The First Baptist Church dismissed Mary Lambert on Aug. 9 with a letter explaining that the church had adopted an interpretation that prohibits women from teaching men. She had taught there for 54 years.

The letter quoted the first epistle to Timothy: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” READ MORE OF THIS STUPID SHIT!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Sphere: Related Content