politicalpartypoop.com

A comment I received on this post: McCain Gaffes, Volunteering Wife For Topless Contest

I Peters Says:

August 8th, 2008 at 1:29 am e

Obviously none of you know what you are talking about, because the Miss Buffalo Chip Contest is not and not even near to a toppless contest. It is truely a beauty contest, put on by hawaiian tropics.

Larry, what is wrong with long haired guys with loud pipes, Most of these guys have served our country. Obviously you have no idea what Sturgis is about.

OH REALLY!

Ok I have never been to the annual Sturgis Rally in South Dakota. Everywhere I have read is that skank biker chicks go topless or do the wet T-shirt thing in the contest.
I don’t have a fucken idea but people if you are going to come here to fucken correct me and what I post give me some links some information SOMETHING anything to show that what I posted is inaccurate or misleading otherwise don’t bother posting a goddamm mutherfucken comment!!!!!!!!! SHIT!

I have absolutely no problem being corrected and if I’m wrong I’ll admit it but don’t come here with a stick up your ass and act like some smart ass.
“Obviously none of you know what you are talking about”
If I’m wrong then all of these fucken links are wrong as well! Every damm body is trashing this peaceful wholesome gathering of clean cut upstanding citizens and her you have a fucken presidential candidate so ridiculously out of touch and desperate for any type of attention decides to bring his wife to this cesspool of human depravity and drunkenness and offer her hot body to a bunch of drunken biker rednecks.
But Nooooooooo I or (we) don’t know what the fuck we are talking about.
Are you fucken serious?

McCain, Drogin relates, told his rowdy listeners “that he had encouraged his wife to enter the annual Sturgis beauty contest, one in which nudity is not uncommon

John McCain’s “do anything for a vote” strategy takes him today to the anything-goes town of Sturgis, South Dakota, where the candidate will court the biker vote amid naked beauty pageants, nude mud wrestling events, public nudity and drunken fights.

The “Miss Buffalo Chip Beauty Pageant - Bikinis on the Beach” was described by Jim Caple of EPSN as “essentially a topless beauty pageant. And occasionally bottomless, too.”

Getting an eyeful in biker heaven

McCain goes to Sturgis: because 50,000 fat guys in leather can’t be wrong

Sphere: Related Content

(AP - Via MediaTakeOut.com )

Keep in mind as you read the same young lady was featured in this positive article: Women Drive NASCAR’s Fast Lane

###

As an aspiring racing official, Mauricia Grant had grown used to working in a man’s world.

When she finally made it into NASCAR, Grant was appalled at the way she says she was treated beginning from her first day on the job until her firing last October.

Now she’s suing NASCAR for $225 million, alleging racial and sexual discrimination, sexual harassment and wrongful termination.

“I loved it. It was a great, exciting, adrenaline-filled job where I worked with fast cars and the best drivers in the world,” Grant told The Associated Press. “But there was an ongoing daily pattern (of harassment). It was the nature of the people I worked with, the people who ran it, it trickled down from the top.

“It’s just the way things are in the garage.”

The 32-year-old Grant, who is black, worked as a technical inspector responsible for certifying cars in NASCAR’s second-tier Nationwide Series from January 2005 until her termination. In the lawsuit, she alleged she was referred to as “Nappy Headed Mo” and “Queen Sheba,” by co-workers, was often told she worked on “colored people time,” and was frightened by one official who routinely made references to the Ku Klux Klan.

In addition, Grant said she was subjected to sexual advances from male co-workers, two of whom allegedly exposed themselves to her, and graphic and lewd jokes.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, lists 23 specific incidents of alleged sexual harassment and 34 specific incidents of alleged racial and gender discrimination beginning when she was hired in January 2005 through her October 2007 firing.

NASCAR spokesman Ramsey Poston said the organization had not yet reviewed the suit.

“As an equal opportunity employer, NASCAR is fully committed to the spirit and letter of affirmative action law,” Poston said, adding NASCAR has a zero tolerance policy for harassment.

In the lawsuit, Grant said she complained numerous times to her supervisors about how she was treated, to no avail. On one occasion, Grant said Nationwide Series director Joe Balash, her immediate supervisor, was dismissive of her complaints, explaining her co-workers were “former military guys” with a rough sense of humor. “You just have to deal with it,” she says Balash told her.

On another occasion, she alleged Balash participated in the harassment.

“Does your workout include an urban obstacle course with a flat-screen TV on your back?” she claimed Balash asked her during the week of July 28, 2007 while working in Indianapolis.

Grant told the AP her two younger sisters witnessed racial discrimination against the official while visiting her at Daytona International Speedway in 2006 and encouraged her to document every incident going forward.

The lawsuit details a series of those alleged incidents:

• Grant was forced to work outside more often than the white male officials because her supervisors believed she couldn’t sunburn because she was black.
• While riding in the backseat of her car pool at Talladega Superspeedway, co-workers told her to duck as they passed race fans. “I don’t want to start a riot when these fans see a black woman in my car,” she claims one official said.
• When packing up a dark garage at Texas Motor Speedway an official told Grant: “Keep smiling and pop your eyes out ’cause we can’t see you.”
• When she ignored advances from co-workers, Grant was accused of being gay. She also claimed co-workers questioned the sexual orientation of two other female officials.

After her termination, Grant said she went over her notes and recognized “a pattern of retaliation and discrimination.”

“It didn’t diminish my love for the sport of auto racing, but the job wasn’t always the easiest thing to go to every day,” she said.

Grant said she routinely complained to her supervisors. Two weeks after her final complaint, Grant said she was warned during the week of August 18, 2007 at Michigan International Speedway that she had engaged in “conduct unbecoming of a NASCAR representative” and would be fired unless she changed her behavior. She said the warning stemmed from a confrontation with a track official who stopped her as she passed through a gate to use the restroom.

Roughly two months later, Grant was fired, and NASCAR cited a poor work performance in ending her employment. The lawsuit claims other than a previous warning for using “street” language, Grant had never been disciplined for job performance and routinely received positive reviews.

“It is time for NASCAR to realize that not everbody is going to be bought off and not file a complaint,” said Grant’s attorney, Benedict P. Morelli of Morelli Ratner PC. “Not everybody is going to be intimidated and not file a complaint. Not everybody is going to be blackballed and not file a complaint.”

In addition, the suit claims official Heather Gambino was fired in 2006 for complaining about a sexually hostile work environment. The suit also claims former official Dean Duckett, who is black, was reprimanded and ultimately fired last November for using “aggressive language toward a white co-worker.”

Among those identified in Grant’s suit are Balash, assistant series director Mike Dolan, supervisors Alan Shephard and Dennis Dillon, NASCAR’s senior manager for business relations, the human resources director and 17 of Grant’s fellow officials. All of the defendants are white.

“My supervisors all praised me. I was hanging in there with the guys,” she said. “I am an athletic person. I went over the wall and faced malicious crews and competitive crew chiefs, and I was right there and held it down and was never lazy about it.

“And I knew that once I was terminated, there wasn’t going to be an opportunity for me to find another industry like NASCAR to practice my craft.”

Sphere: Related Content

Found link via Politik Ditto - Post from the LA Times Blog

Shocking Fox News video: Guest chuckles over killing Osama, Obama

Does this Fox News contributor, Liz Trotta, really suggest what it sounds like she suggests — the assassination of both Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama? And then laughs!

Where is the outrage?  And the apology?

(UPDATE: Finally, it came and abject it was. (See below, a good ways into the tape.)

(UPDATE TO THE UPDATE: Over at WakeUp America, Susan makes a powerful point. Jeffrey Feldman of HuffingtonPost has a strong denunciation of the Trotta gaffe and a call for greater broadcast scrutiny and care about such language because the public does not want it. Though as of late Monday he had not posted Trotta’s apology.

(Yet, on the same HuffPost site there’s an apparently satirical piece by Guy Saperstein quoting a hopefully fictitious Clinton campaign strategy memo saying, “Assassination is still on the table, but it is still only one of many possibilities.” This is funny stuff on one page but legitimate outrage on another?

(And does anyone remember outrage a while back when Sen. Ted Kennedy called the Illinois senator Osama bin Laden?)

#########

#########

Let me just say I think Obama is a jackass, he is not very bright, if elected he would make a HORRIBLE president, he is a closet socialist and a flaming liberal, having said that I’m really getting tired of these fucken stupid ass white redneck racist pundits mispronouncing his name and joking about this assassination shit.

If John Edwards or any other white candidate were the Democratic front runner you would not be hearing these assassination gaffes. These gaffes are intentional and serve a purpose to perpetuate the notion that the only way to keep this nigger from running the country and save America is to put a fucken bullet in his head.

As a black dude I don’t find this shit funny, not even a little bit and despite my polar opposite political leanings dude has a chance to make history and continuing to put the ideas in the heads of some trigger happy toothless hillbilly Hillary supporter is simply not cool.

This idiot bitch in the video and others like her need to be more forcefully called out and TV pundits, news agencies, blogs need to be more outspoken about this shit and the next time someone “jokes” about an Obama assassination they need to be run off of TV.

If Obama becomes president he will fail because he is a liberal and America will reject his socialist ways.
Joking about the possibility of harm being “aimed” his way is simply not acceptable.
I don’t have a large enough audience to make any impact on this issue. But I hope the next time someone jokes about an Obama assassination attempt someone will speak out forcefully and expose these racist bastards.

The fact that these people making these assassination jokes simply give some less than convincing apology is just outrageous.
This bitch should not be appearing on Fox news or any other TV news show.
Next we will hear about some racist coming up with a video game, “Kill the Negro President.”

Sphere: Related Content

Marietta bar owner Mike Norman says the T-shirts he’s peddling, featuring a look-a-like of cartoon chimp Curious George peeling a banana, with Obama in ‘08 underneath, are not meant to offend. Norman acknowledged the imagery’s Jim Crow roots but said he sees nothing wrong with depicting a prominent African-American as a monkey

Oh great when I saw this clip and saw this fucken redneck I’m thinking, sure you weren’t thinking racist thoughts when you printed those t-shirts. Who is he fucken kidding?

Hey I’m all for good humor, shit anyone who has been to this blog knows that, but redneck dudes like this remind me of when I went to the Pentagon March last year and I was checking out the festivities recording what was going on and a few of these Vietnam Vet redneck biker types walked up on me and was eye ballin’ me, I finally told one mutherfucker to back off of me, I reminded the racist fuck that I was former military and was he walking up on me because I’m black, assuming that I was part of the liberal protest contingent?

This was one of the few times I vehemently disagreed with Michelle Malkin on her coverage of the event. Yes the liberals were annoying chanting the typical anti Bush shit, but most of the problems I witnessed were of these Vietnam Vets taking signs out of the hands of old ladies and shouting obscenities.
One old lady I bet in her 70’s got her purse snatched and tossed down the steps of the Lincoln Memorial because she was one the “wrong side” of the protest line. Several others were ganging up on young teens girls like a bunch of punk asses. One dude with a bullhorn was shouting racist bullshit while the other “pro American” folks stood by and said nothing.

So every time I see these redneck, confederate flag, biker toads, fake ass war heroes, closet racists trying to be funny like the owner of this bar, I look at it just a little differently.

Again, I’m hardly a fan of Obama, but if dude happens to win the presidency (not likely tho) you will see more racist bullshit like this from these types of trailer trash whites who will claim “we didn’t mean anything by it, we really like Nigras and some coons.”

The clip just had to mention that this dude has “conservative” views and you wonder why black folks vote 90 percent Democrat because this redneck fuck is unfortunately the poster child for “racist Republicans.”

Sphere: Related Content

Like most people in Mingo County, West Virginia, Leonard Simpson is a lifelong Democrat. But given a choice between Barack Obama and John McCain in November, the 67-year-old retired coalminer would vote Republican.“I heard that Obama is a Muslim and his wife’s an atheist,” said Mr Simpson, drawing on a cigarette outside the fire station in Williamson, a coalmining town of 3,400 people surrounded by lush wooded hillsides.Mr Simpson’s remarks help explain why Mr Obama is trailing Hillary Clinton, his Democratic rival, by 40 percentage points ahead of Tuesday’s primary election in the heavily white and rural state, according to recent opinion polls.

A landslide victory for Mrs Clinton in West Virginia will do little to improve her fading hopes of winning the Democratic nomination, because Mr Obama has an almost insurmountable lead in the overall race.

But Tuesday’s contest is likely to reinforce Mrs Clinton’s argument that she would be the stronger opponent for Mr McCain in November, and raise fresh doubts about whether the US is ready to elect its first black president.

Occupying a swathe of the Appalachian Mountains on the threshold between the Bible Belt and the Rust Belt, West Virginia is a swing state that voted twice for George W. Bush but backed Democrats in six of the eight prior presidential elections.

No Democrat has been elected to the White House without carrying West Virginia since 1916, yet Mr Obama appears to have little chance of winning there in November. Recent opinion polls indicate that Mrs Clinton would narrowly beat Mr McCain in the state but Mr Obama would lose by nearly 20 percentage points.

West Virginia is hostile territory for Mr Obama because it has few of the African-Americans and affluent, college-educated whites who provide his strongest support. The state has the lowest college graduation rate in the US, the second lowest median household income, and one of the highest proportions of white residents, at 96 per cent.

A visit to Mingo County, a Democratic stronghold in the heart of the Appalachian coalfields, reveals the scale of Mr Obama’s challenge – not only in West Virginia but in white, working-class communities across the US. With a gun shop on its main street and churches dotted throughout the town, Williamson is the kind of community evoked by Mr Obama’s controversial comments last month about “bitter” small-town voters who “cling to guns or religion”.

“If he is the nominee, the Democrats have no chance of winning West Virginia,” said Missy Endicott, a 40- year-old school administrator. “He doesn’t understand ordinary Americans.”

West Virginia, ordinary Americans? Is she fucken kidding. Ordinary Americans are not cooking up possum pie for dinner and serving road kill cuisine at the church picnic!

Sphere: Related Content

By Kathy Kiely and Jill Lawrence - LINKHillary Rodham Clinton vowed Wednesday to continue her quest for the Democratic nomination, arguing she would be the stronger nominee because she appeals to a wider coalition of voters — including whites who have not supported Barack Obama in recent contests.

“I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article “that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.”

“There’s a pattern emerging here,” she said.

Clinton’s blunt remarks about race came a day after primaries in Indiana and North Carolina dealt symbolic and mathematical blows to her White House ambitions. The Obama campaign, looking toward locking up the nomination, stepped up pressure on superdelegates who have the decisive votes in their race.

In both states, Clinton won six of 10 white voters, according to surveys of people as they left polling places.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said that in Indiana, Obama split working-class voters with Clinton and won a higher percentage of white voters than in Ohio in March. He said Obama will be the strongest nominee because he appeals “to Americans from every background and all walks of life. These statements from Sen. Clinton are not true and frankly disappointing.”

Clinton rejected any idea that her emphasis on white voters could be interpreted as racially divisive. “These are the people you have to win if you’re a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that.”

Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said Clinton’s comment was a “poorly worded” variation on the way analysts have been “slicing and dicing the vote in racial terms.”

However, he said her primary support doesn’t prove she’s more electable. Either Democrat will get “the vast majority” of the other’s primary election votes in a general election, he said.

Clinton lost North Carolina by 15 percentage points and won Indiana by 2 points after competing full-out in both states. She had loaned the campaign $6.4 million in the past month. She said she might lend more.

“We should finish the contests we have and see where we stand after they’re over,” she said, referring to the six remaining primaries that will end June 3.

There were signs of unrest Wednesday, even among Clinton allies. California Sen. Dianne Feinstein wondered to The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper, “whether she can get the delegates that she needs.” Former South Dakota senator George McGovern, whose 1972 presidential bid gave Clinton her first political experience, switched his support from Clinton to Obama.

LISTEN HERE:

Sphere: Related Content

(link) As she races through Iowa in the days before next week’s caucuses, Hillary Clinton is taking few chances. She tells crowds that it’s their turn to “pick a president,’’ but over the last two days she has not invited them to ask her any questions.Before the brief Christmas break, the New York senator had been setting aside time after campaign speeches to hear from the audience. Now when she’s done speaking, her theme songs blare from loudspeakers, preventing any kind of public Q&A.

She was no more inviting when a television reporter approached her after a rally on Thursday and asked if she was “moved’’ by Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Clinton turned away without answering.

Her daughter, Chelsea, had the same reaction when a reporter approached her with a question.

Hillary Clinton’s no-question policy didn’t sit well with some of the Iowans who came to see her speak.

“I was a little bit underwhelmed,’’ said Doug Rohde, 46, as he left her a rally in a fire station in Denison. “The message was very generic — and no questions.’’

I’m actually going to side with Mrs. Bill on this one; I’m thinking what the fuck, how many times can you deal with taking the same stupid fucken questions over and over from a bunch of clueless rednecks.
I heard on the news last night that 1/3 of the folks in Iowa STILL say they are undecided!

Um people if you are still undecided about what person you are supporting for president then frankly you are either mildly retarded, or you really don’t give a shit.
In the age of You Tube and 24 hour news cycles, and millions of blogs what the fuck else do you have to know about a particular candidate.
How many times do you have to hear a Democrat say, “health care for everybody, bla, bla, bla” “out of Iraq” “welfare benefits for all, bla bla bla.” Get a clue!!!!

The fact that every damm time I see an audience of people in Iowa behind a candidate it’s a fucken blue hair, bingo crowd, lollapalooza fest.
Shit they can’t remember what Obama said the day before at the pancake breakfast or two days before at the Butter Cow Convention or two weeks before at the Miss Future Farmers of America Pageant, damm!!!

Sphere: Related Content

I’m trolling the blogsphere and I come across this article: Confederate flag supporters upset by Romney, Thompson and I read this blog entry from this dude who is upset that Thompson and Romney dissed the Confederate Flag.

Folks I can’t help but to laugh at the ridiculously stupid shit. Just as I find individuals obsession with symbolic nonsense like “the noose” “gang colors” Nazi symbols and other bullshit I find this amusing.
Think about it, this guy would on a dime change his political support for any individual because they find a racist symbol, the Confederate Flag, repulsive and divisive.

Here is a portion of his post: You can read the full entry here

Thursday (11-29-2007), with remarks they made during a Republican debate that evening… which was televised, Governor Mitt Romney, and former Senator Fred Thompson, joined McCain as confirmed losers in their attempts to gain the office of President of the United States.As of this date, IoF will no longer support Fred Thompson’s campaign for the Presidency. I cannot, in good conscious, support a man who holds my heritage in contempt. And I certainly cannot support a fellow Southerner who has no more respect for his own heritage than that displayed by Thompson in his remarks Thursday night.

My family fought, bled, and died beneath that flag! Knowing, as I do, their reasons for offering up their lives in defense of their homes and families I cannot be disrespectful of their sacrifices, including the ultimate sacrifice, made for me! I cannot… and I WILL NOT!

Now, to those of you who may think I, and my fellow Southerners, are over re-acting to something that happened 146 years ago, may I remind you, it was the election of an anti-southern candidate to the office of the Presidency, in 1860, which turned out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back and forced the South to leave the Union… and brought on this continent the bloodiest conflict in the history of the North American Continent. If you have read this far, then you now know, if you had doubts, the scars are not yet healed from that conflict.

This was a bitter, bitter, decision for those of us here at IoF. But, in the end, it was the only decision I could make. Life is simply too short to compromise one’s core belief(s) and I shall not do it.

Oh boo fucken hoo! The very reason why CNN put that stupid ass question on the debate was to do what all liberals seek to do and that is continue to portray the Republican Party as a bunch of racist rednecks who are more concerned with racist symbolic nonsense that real issues that fact this country.

Folks, let me be clear, and I have said this on numerous occasions, I don’t give a fuck about the Confederate Flag in general, if people want to fly the flag off their balconies, or in the rear window of their cars, hand these stupid flags in their dorm rooms or whatever. But don’t try and pretend that your sensibilities are being trampled upon because people who know better, particularly politicians are smart enough to avoid a racist symbol like the plague and choose to distance themselves from it.

“Oh but Snoop the Confederate flag is not a racist symbol,” bullshit, then why every time I see some redneck wearing it or I go to a website promoting it, or I see some neo-Nazi protest it all up in my face.
The people did not adopt this symbol for the hell of it. Young kids like the moron in the dorm room at the You Tube debate try and run the line of “heritage” because there is now this PR campaign to push racist symbolism underground in an attempt to make it more palatable to the masses.

When “symbols” govern your life and is used in helping you prioritize what is important in your life, then frankly you need to take a good look in the mirror and do some self reevaluation and analysis.

---

If you have not seen this movie I highly recommend it. Very Funny

Sphere: Related Content

This was amusing, found on Little Green Footballs.

Sorry folks but this won’t work. People who are Neo-Nazi’s and devout racist fucks have a mental disorder, you can remove all of the symbolic shit you want but you still have the hatred shit bubbling in the head and the heart.

Hmm. Neo-Nazis toning down the rhetoric and getting rid of hate symbols, to appear more palatable to the masses.

Anti-Semitic church drops Nazi symbols.

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - An anti-Semitic church formed by white supremacists has abandoned its neo-Nazi imagery, such as swastikas, to make its message more palatable, a change that a leading Jewish group called an attempt to “sanitize hatred.”The group banned the use of Nazi uniforms, red arm bands and similar regalia because they were an instant turnoff to people who might otherwise be open to the church’s teachings, including the belief that white Anglo-Saxons — not Jews — are God’s chosen people in the Bible.“We don’t like the swastikas. We don’t like the negativity,” said Jonathan Williams, the leading pastor of the United Church of YHWH. “The majority of people see all that as pure evil.”

Williams was formerly involved with Aryan Nations, which was once the best-known neo-Nazi organization in the United States. It was led by Richard Butler, who was acquitted in 1989 on charges of attempting to create a new Aryan country through assassinations, robberies, guerrilla bands and a race war. In 2000, the group had to give up its compound in Hayden, Idaho, after Butler lost a $6.3 million judgment for an attack on a mother and son. After Butler died in 2004, followers relocated to Talladega in east Alabama, and earlier this year renamed themselves the United Church of YHWH. The initials are a reference to Yahweh, the Hebrew word for God.

Bill Nigut, the regional director of the Anti-Defamation League, said the group was attempting to “sanitize hatred” by appearing to be more mainstream. “We find it very disturbing. They can begin a conversation now with people they could not have before,” he said. “They can get in the door.”

Sphere: Related Content

Read more here at Hot Air, or go to any number of blogs, but I’m wondering who gives a fuck?
We need to rid the GOP of these old school rednecks so the party can get more credibility.
He can join that racist fuck Democrat who lost her seat in Louisiana and they can start a redneck image consulting firm.

Sphere: Related Content

“The NAACP is going to do all it can to see that she is not re-elected,” he said. “At this point, the NAACP is not concerned about the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. If a Republican is elected because of her racist remarks, that’s her responsibility.” Dartez did not immediately return a call Monday.”I made an insensitive comment, and I regret my choice of words,” she said Friday. “I have apologized to both Hazel and Jerome Boykin. The Boykin family has been a huge help in my campaign for re-election, and I did not mean to offend them.”But Hazel Boykin said Dartez still has not personally apologized.

---

I’m sorry regular readers, but I’m still pissed about this. Hell I expected to go through my news site progressions and see more about this and I don’t. Fucken figures! All of the bullshit outrage about nooses and Dog Chapman ranting to his son in a private conversation, remember MACACA!

---

But nooooo, a racist bastard Democrat, an elected representative, says this to someone who helped her cracka ass cracka ass get elected and so why is the media not all over this shit!?
This bitch is so lucky I’m not one of those big time million hit per day blogs and or someone with lots of dead presidents in the bank. I would personally make damm sure her ass is not reelected.
So all I have is this little sounding board so I’ll just have to deal with it.
I found this comment below on the website The Steel Deal: we are on the same page, I’m so pissed I figure post his rant without my customary typos…. calm down Snoop…AArggh!!!

---

Aside from the fact that this Dartez ‘person’ is far too stupid to be running water, much less for public office, this tableau illustrates, what to me, is the very saddest aspect of the Left in general and liberals and Democrats specifically. If it were not for minorities, there would be no Democratic party. It would’ve disappeared in the 50s, when the Democratic party was the segregationist party and the party of ‘State’s rights.’ The party of Lester Maddox and George Wallace. The party of KKK Grand Wizard Robert Byrd (Sen D-WVa.). The Dixiecrat Party.John F. Kennedy saved the Democratic party from itself - in spite of itself. And in so doing, in his short tenure, he was able to convince minorties, primarily blacks, that the Democrats had their best interests at heart. LBJ saw the light and the wisdom of that strategy and the ‘New Democratic’ party was born. Only one problem - the only thing that changed was that the racism, paternalism, and patronizing went underground. By no means did it go away.

I’ve heard so many black folks say they prefer overt and blatant racism to what comes from the Left. The Left pays lip service to your face, but you ain’t nothin’ but a nigger when they sit around and talk and think nobody’s listening. Why minorities do not, cannot or refuse to grasp that is beyond me. I suppose they may actually believe that hand outs equate to hand shakes. Those few dollars may seem like something in the short run, but in the grand scheme of things, the Left, the Democratic party, can only survive if they keep minorities begging. And that they do so very well.

There is nothing so repulsively hypocritical as a liberal. They will spend YOUR money to buy votes from people they’ll only speak to when there’s something in it for them. As soon as they’ve gotten whatever they wanted - be it power, votes or ego strokes - liberals scuttle back to their own, like so many cockroaches. The one thing they fear most is the light of day. This ugly little story exposes them to that light.

But, you won’t be hearing about this tomorrow. They’ll still be up in arms about “Dog’ Chapman, Don Imus or whoever the hapless non-liberal who gets caught making a real or perceived slur might be tomorrow. As long as the race baiters can keep the focus on ‘da man’ and not on themselves, they’ll continue to win elections. And the dirty little secret of their hypocrisy will go unoticed and unconfronted for yet another generation. With apologies to Martin Luther King, I have a dream, too. I dream that someday we’ll all wake up and recognize what the Left has perpetuated on this society for over 60 years and see it for what it is - contrived classism, invented racism and manufactured economic disparity for the sake of their own political power.

Just remember this, nothing’s as bad as the Left would have you believe - they can only thrive in misery. Their very existence requires unrest, instability, racial strife, economic uncertainty, class disparity and general malaise - perceived or manufactured. Without those things there’d be no reason to consider granting them power. Who in their right mind would vote for someone who promised to take more of their hard-earned money unless they’d been scared sufficiently by the constant repetition of ‘how bad things are?’

After awhile, you start believing it. Or …

“A lie told often enough becomes truth” Vladimir Lenin.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. Joseph Goebbels.

Sphere: Related Content

The Headline was in RED at the top of Drudge, OMG, I was in tears laughing when I saw this! I should just stop posting for the rest of the day LOL!!!!

WASHINGTON –NASCAR fans might seem rabid, but are they actually contagious?Getting a hepatitis shot is standard procedure for travelers to parts of Africa and Asia, but some congressional aides were instructed to get immunized before going to Lowe’s Motor Speedway in Concord and the racetrack in Talladega, Ala.

The House Homeland Security Committee planned a fact-finding trip about public health preparedness at mass gatherings and decided to conduct the research at two of the nation’s most heavily attended sporting events, NASCAR’s Bank of America 500 event this weekend and the UAW-Ford 500 last weekend.

Staff who organized the trips advised the NASCAR-bound aides to get a range of vaccines before attending — hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria and influenza.

Rep. Robin Hayes, a Republican from Concord, took umbrage when he heard about it.

“I have never heard of immunizations for domestic travel, and as the representative for Concord, N.C., I feel compelled to ask why the heck the committee feels that immunizations are needed to travel to my hometown,” Hayes said in an Oct. 5 letter to Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who chairs the Homeland Security panel.

“I have been to numerous NASCAR races, and the folks who attend these events certainly do not pose any health hazard to congressional staffers or anyone else,” Hayes added.

Lauri Wilks, vice president of communications for Speedway Motorsports, which owns Lowe’s Motor Speedway and other tracks, said Wednesday that immunizations aren’t needed for the race.

“There’s no health risk that we know of,” she said, laughing. “We have never had any disease outbreak during one of our weekends.”

The four aides were asked to explore public health issues at events involving large gatherings, such as how law enforcement and medical personnel would respond to an act of terrorism or other emergency. Lawmakers weren’t part of the trip.

The staffers traveled to Talladega last weekend, and are scheduled to be at Lowe’s Motor Speedway this weekend.

Thompson said the immunizations are commonly recommended for people working in hospitals, holding centers and similar locations.

“Since committee staff members are visiting hospital and other health-care facilities available at or near these venues, including areas where groups of people are detained before being transferred to other off-site facilities, I believe that the recommendation (not requirement) that our congressional staff receive these same immunizations was sound,” Thompson said in a letter responding to Hayes issued Wednesday.

“I am sure you would agree that providing immunizations to personnel involved in public safety is good public health policy, and there is no need to exclude staff from taking the preventative measures that the public health community recommends — regardless of why and where mass gatherings are taking place,” Thompson said in the letter.

Jim Walker, Alabama’s director of homeland security, said the congressional committee aides who visited Talladega worked hard. He said they were trying to determine whether the state and federal emergency response system was adequate to handle a situation at such a large event.

“I might have been a little skeptical about this visit coming in, but these folks worked,” Walker said.

He said the aides went on patrols with law enforcement, toured facilities and interviewed first responders, hazardous materials teams and other officials.

Walker said he hadn’t recommended the immunizations, nor were they necessary. He suggested a possible health risk to them was the voluminous notes they took.

“I’m sure they needed to soak their wrists, they wrote so much,” he said.

Sphere: Related Content

A response to a comment I received.

I would respectfully suggest that your gross error on this issue is due to the giant hysterical racial chip on your shoulder causing you to be overly critical in any matters relating to Paul. While that’s your choice to make, it tarnishes your credibility on other issues.

I don’t get it, I don’t get why so many people are giving me such grief over a “nobody” like Ron Paul.
In case reality has not hit some of you people Ron Paul has as much a chance to receiving the Republican bid to be president of these United States as I do.
Something else I don’t get, why folks keep assuming that I have a “hysterical racial chip’ on my shoulder? Blogs are public forums, and the proprietor of any blog is more likely than not to post items presenting a slightly biased view.

I have said before but it’s worth repeating, I have NEVER, ever visited another individuals blog and chastised the blogmaster over what he or she decides to post and rail against their particular viewpoints.

I am a black man, so despite the bitches and gripes from pigment challenged individuals I will continue to focus on race issues and call attention when racist ass fucks like Ron Paul want to degrade and put black people on the back of the societal bus.

I scan hundreds of blogs a day, watch cable news in the office most of the day, visit a number of news sites so I’m pretty dialed in to what is going on.

However out of the hundreds of sites I may visit few if any deal with minority issues particularly issues affecting blacks.
Why is that, because most of the blogsphere is white, so why would I expect white folks to give a fuck about what is going on in the Negro world.

I am a conservative and I focus on right leaning issues, however I’m not going to deny and ignore race issues because some want to put a positive spin on some idiot political hack.

Being racist and racism is not ties to one particular party. Despite liberal Democrats continuing to spin the “Republicans are racist” tag line I have never fallen for that empty and baseless propaganda.

As we all know words mean things, whether it’s Ron Paul pimping the “beware, Negro behind the Bush” racist rant or Mitt Romney’s religion trying to reverse racist teachings, or Hillary Clinton changing vocal tones to speak down to blacks, or Obama temporarily abandoning his “articulate” tendencies to also speak down to black folks or idiot John Kerry raising his fist in a mock black power salute to a black audience, it’s all silly, stupid and self destructive particularly coming from people who seek to run this nation and that can’t be ignored, period.

For me, from being put into a police car because they (the cops) did not believe me when I told them where I lived, to a teacher actually segregating my classroom, separating the blacks from the whites (black kids were assigned to sit up front), rocks, and eggs thrown at my home (only black family) being routinely called nigger before I finally found out what the heck it meant, to being “uninvited” from a neighborhood birthday party.

Fast forward to having interviews cancelled after interviewers found out what race I was, to STILL in 2007 going to places where white people reign and getting looks like they have not seen a fucken Negro before. Oh and don’t let me be with Mrs. Snoop, interracial marriage is a sin ya know.
My life is all good, despite dealing with a recent revelation of type II diabetes, a bum knee, a troubled but improving daughter, but great grandkids, decent job, although a HD flat screen would be nice (football season is coming up) but I digress.
C’mon, you think I’m going to ignore race issues to make some of you white folks comfortable or to placate to people pushing a particular political candidate?

Jesus H. Christ, there are literarily millions of blogs out there and you come hear questioning my credibility?

If you want to read crap kissing Ron Paul’s ass, then this is not the place to be.
If hearing about race issues makes you squeamish then this is not the site for you.
But make no mistake I’ll tell you exactly what I think. I don’t pull punches in real life so why do it here.

Between my old blog and this one I have been blogging for more than two years, so folks have to know by now, if you want to read the rants of a right wing conservative Negro then welcome to PPP.
If you don’t like what you see then step off, hell I’m not getting paid for this.
I choose to forgo the ads because I don’t want a bunch of shit I would never buy or crap I would never read inundating my blog. Besides every damm blog has the same crappy ads I don’t get it.
Maintaining a blog is fun and I enjoy doing it, because I get to vent, it’s in many ways therapeutic.

Bottom line, frankly, I don’t give a fuck what people think. This blog is about MY opinions and that ain’t changing anytime soon.

Sphere: Related Content

“What the hell Snoop this picture has nothing to do with earmarks”
Read below… In case y’all forgot

Guaranteed 100% pork. The media has noted, though many libertarians have ignored, that the allegedly “libertarian” Republican, Ron Paul, has been bringing home the bacon to his district, just like every other vote-seeking politician. The PR hype is that Paul is different. Judge for yourself.Paul says he only votes for spending authorized by the US Constitution. But when it comes to using his Congressional position, to request pork for projects in his own district, apparently anything goes. Whether the spending is Constitutionally legitimate, or no,t Paul brings home the bacon.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Paul:

…leads the Houston-area delegation in the number of earmarks, or special funding requests, that he is seeking for his district. He is trying to nab public money for 65 projects, such as marketing wild shrimp and renovating the old movie theater in Edna that closed in 1977 — neither of which is envisioned in the Constitution as an essential government function.

Paul’s arguments for using pork barrel projects in his own district is that, “if they take it, we should ask for it back.” Of course, on that basis, there is little spending which is not justified.

Paul also argued that these special earmarks, used by Congressman to increase their own popularity at home, don’t add anything to the budget. The funding is already in the budget he says and the budget is not increased to compensate for them. But spending $400 million on pork, as Paul requested, still means the $400 million is spent. And, under the current budget, if it is spent, it contributes to the deficit that will, no doubt, mean higher future taxes. While agencies try to spend their full budget so they can request more the next year. There is some slim chance that funding allocated will not be spent. Earmarking makes sure the funds are spent.

Read more at Classically Liberal

Also: Ron Paul wants $8 million earmarked for marketing of wild American shrimp

Ron Paul: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Yawn, so Ron Paul is a fraud like most politicians, big deal. C’mon folks is this like shocking to you? I always thought that dude was a dickhead and should have never been taken seriously, but noooooo, some of you in the audience said Ron Paul makes sense and is a great candidate, plez.
Now in case you forgot may issue with him is much bigger, he is a racist fuck!

• Texas congressional candidate Ron Paul’s 1992 political newsletter highlighted portrayals of blacks as inclined toward crime and lacking sense about top political issues.
• “Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action,”Paul wrote.
• ’ I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal,” Paul said.
• Paul also wrote that although “we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.”
• We don’t think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such.”

From: “Oh Snoop, you’re wrong about Ron Paul”

This is another reason why we need more black bloggers because white bloggers won’t point this shit out.
If you are a racist bastard you are disqualified from running for president, period.
How this idiot is getting elected in his particular district is beyond me. But hey, one man’s racist is another man earmark pimp.
Even if you wear the hood and sheets as long as you bring the district money, who cares!

Sphere: Related Content

(Story Source) Leaders at Riverdale Christian Academy (California) are accused of racism after a themed graduation party on Friday, June 1st.

The theme was southern plantations during the Civil War. Students and staff dressed up in period costumes for the event.

Controversy arose when some school employees dressed up as slaves and wore black make-up on their faces, arms and legs.

Pictures from this party ended up on the internet and have caused controversy. One photo shows a scene of a runaway slave as he is taken away. Other photos show slaves working in the field and at a lemonade stand. The scenes were part of a graduation party skit.

Douglas Spencer, Principal, Riverdale Christian Academy said “The point of the skit it to roast the graduates and poke a little fun at their mannerism and different things like that.”

Spencer said the school holds a themed graduation party every year for the students. Pictures from this year’s skit were posted on the internet which caught the attention of local blog writer Tate Hill.

Hill claims he is offended by the skit as an African American and as a Christian, saying “It really concerned me that other individuals that share that same faith would allow themselves to be involved in such circumstances that only portray hatred prejudice and racism.”

Principal Spencer has apologized for the pictures and the offensive skit. He said they did not mean to offend anyone and it was all a big misunderstanding.

All the photos have been taken down from the internet.

There are about 130 students enrolled in Riverdale Christian Academy and many of them attended the party.

What is it with white people and this blackface bullshit? Do we still have the secret society of rednecks who still do this shit behind closed doors and on occasion get caught.
Not to beat a dead horse, but this is why the Imus’s, the KKK, skinheads of the world has never bothered me because they have the balls to simply say, “we hate niggers.”
Here you have educators at a “Christian” school claiming “ignorance” and issuing hollow apologies. Mr. Tate points out what should be the obvious:

“This is not merely a theatrical production emulating fictional characters, but a purposeful demonstration of disregard for the seriousness of the black American slave experience. It trivializes slavery, it celebrates the ungodly and unfounded Biblical justification of this Era”

This is just amazing that in 2007 in the midst of all of the racist crap eroding our society ignorant ass racist redneck fucks still don’t get it. Blackface is not cool, “but we was just playin.’ we love darkies!

Sphere: Related Content

Update: These idiot bastards now are apologizing? What the hell for, for being fucken redneck idiots!?
I’m just wondering what kind of social misfit listens to this stupid ass show?

Sphere: Related Content

Talk show host Don Imus’ derogatory comment about the Rutgers women’s basketball team might remind some listeners of a remark he made about “Washington Week” moderator Gwen Ifill, reportedly referring to the black journalist at a “cleaning lady.”

In 1993, Ifill was covering the White House for the New York Times when colleagues began asking her why Imus “seemed to have a problem with me,” she recalls in Tuesday’s Times.

“I had no idea what they were talking about because I never listened to the program.”

But five years later, New York Daily News columnist Lars-Erik Nelson clued her in.

“Isn’t the Times wonderful,” Nelson quoted Imus as saying on the radio. “It lets the cleaning lady cover the White House.”

Ifill writes in the Times: “I haven’t talked about this much. I’m a big girl. I have a platform. I have a voice. I’ve been working in journalism long enough that there is little danger that a radio D.J.’s juvenile slap will define or scar me.

“Yesterday, he began telling people he never actually called me a cleaning lady. Whatever. This is not about me. It is about the Rutgers Scarlet Knights.”

Sphere: Related Content

Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-Mich.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, questioned whether Imus fully understood how he hurt black women. That’s when Imus lost it.

“I do understand that. How do you assume that I don’t understand that? Of course I understand that! It’s like the old country song, ‘God may forgive you, but I won’t. Jesus loves you but I don’t.’ So I can’t get any place with you people, but I can get some place with Jesus,” ranted Imus, whose show regularly attracts political and media elite as guests.

The “you people” comment, a racial touchstone made infamous by Ross Perot in a 1992 address, ignited a heated exchange.

“Who is ‘you people,’ Mr. Imus?” asked Sharpton, who wants Imus fired from his morning show.

NBC News Senior Vice President Phil Griffin, who oversees MSNBC, sat behind Imus in the studio throughout the Sharpton interview, but couldn’t stop the I-Man from imploding.

Read full article

Sphere: Related Content

What the hell is he going to apologize for, he is nothing but a redneck racist jackass.

It’s like telling the grand dragon of the Klan to apologize for lynching someone, what the hell?

If MSNBC wants to make a statement they will remove his redneck ass off the air, otherwise any hollow apologizes are just that, hollow and meaningless. Cracka ass cracka!

***NEW YORK — The radio station that produces Don Imus’ talk show pledged to keep tabs on its content after he apologized for calling the players on Rutgers University women’s basketball team “nappy headed hos.”

“We are disappointed by Imus’ actions earlier this week which we find completely inappropriate,” WFAN-AM said in a statement Friday. “We fully agree that a sincere apology was called for and will continue to monitor the program’s content going forward.”

Imus apologized Friday for the comments made earlier this week on his nationally syndicated program.

The National Association of Black Journalists demanded the immediate firing of the “Imus in the Morning” host. Imus questioned the players’ looks, describing them as tattooed “rough girls.” His producer compared the team — which has eight black members — to the NBA’s Toronto Raptors.

Near the start of Friday’s show, Imus said he wanted to “apologize for an insensitive and ill-conceived remark we made the other morning referring to the Rutgers women’s basketball team.”

“It was completely inappropriate, and we can understand why people were offended. Our characterization was thoughtless and stupid, and we are sorry.”

Gregory Lee, an NABJ officer and senior assistant sports editor at The Boston Globe, said the mea culpa did little to atone for the comments.

“You can apologize, but what does that mean when you have a history of making disparaging remarks about people?” Lee asked about the acid-tongued Imus. “This kind of behavior must be punished. I hope the company and sponsors he has take some sort of action … to educate him.”

NABJ President Bryan Monroe asked Thursday if Imus had “lost his mind” and called for the veteran radio host’s dismissal. Rutgers coach C. Vivian Stringer was also incensed by the comments about her team.

“I am deeply saddened and angered by Mr. Imus’ statements,” said Rutgers coach C. Vivian Stringer. “To serve as a joke of Mr. Imus in such an insensitive manner creates a wedge and makes light of these classy individuals, both as women and as women of color.”

Imus was speaking with producer Bernard McGurk when the NCAA title game between Rutgers and Tennessee came up.

“That’s some rough girls from Rutgers,” Imus said.

Read the rest

Sphere: Related Content

By Wayne Washington - Link

Political considerations color the divergent views of presidential candidates on whether the Confederate flag should be moved from the State House grounds.

For Republicans competing in the Feb. 2, 2008, GOP primary, where white voters will hold sway, the flag is a state issue that the candidates are not eager to discuss.

On the Democratic side, where half or more of the voters in the Jan. 29, 2008, primary will be black residents, candidates have no qualms about calling for the flag’s removal.

“Each side is playing to its basic constituency,” said Blease Graham, a political science professor at USC.

A 2000 legislative compromise moved the flag from the State House dome to the grounds, sparking questions about whether it should be removed entirely.

Among six top GOP contenders reached by The State, only U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., offered more than a suggestion that the issue should be decided by South Carolinians.

A Hunter spokesman, Roy Tyler, said his boss thinks South Carolinians should decide the issue, adding the congressman thinks the flag is fine where it flies.

“We’re talking about history here,” Tyler said. “We don’t think we should be slapping anybody’s history in the face.”

MCCAIN’S CHANGING POSITIONS

No candidate has been as wary of the flag issue as U.S. Sen. John McCain, the Arizona Republican whose 2000 campaign bus was dubbed the Straight Talk Express because he bluntly held forth on a number of issues, no matter how delicate.

But the Straight Talk Express took a detour when it ran into the flag. As he campaigned in the crucial S.C. Republican primary against then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush, McCain declined to be drawn into the flag debate, saying it was a matter for state officials to decide.

After he lost, McCain said he didn’t address the issue fully because “I feared that if I answered honestly, I could not win the South Carolina primary.”

McCain said he should have been more direct when asked about the flag, issuing a detailed statement noting his Confederate ancestry.

“Those ancestors of mine might have fought honorably, but they fought to sever the union of our great nation,” he said. “They fought on the wrong side of American history. That, my friends, is how I personally feel about the Confederate battle flag. That is the honest answer I never gave to a fair question. I believe the flag should be removed from your Capitol.”

Fast-forward seven years: McCain is no longer the maverick challenger. As his deep well of big-time GOP support in the state indicates, he is the establishment’s candidate this time.

Danny Diaz, a McCain spokesman, gave a brief statement when asked if the senator thinks the flag should be moved to a different location or remain where it flies.

“A bipartisan solution to this issue was developed by the General Assembly, and the senator applauds their efforts,” Diaz said.

Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, said the response of McCain and his fellow Republicans reflects the views of white GOP primary voters.

“Among white Republican primary voters, they either support the flag strongly or they don’t think it’s a big deal,” Sabato said. “It’s a classic case of a constituency driving candidate positions.”

Of McCain’s changing position, Sabato said: “That was when John McCain was running to win the media primary. Now, he’s running to win the Republican primary.”

‘FLAG IS NOT DIABETES’

Sabato and other political experts said the Confederate flag is a much easier issue for Democratic presidential candidates.

Seven top Democratic candidates reached by The State favor removing the flag from the State House grounds.

Lonnie Randolph, S.C. NAACP president, has argued for the flag’s removal, saying its location is an insult.

But some say other issues are more crucial.

Kendall Corley, a black staff worker for the Richland County Democratic Party, agrees with Randolph. But he wants the presidential candidates to address other pressing concerns.

“That flag is not high blood pressure,” Corley said. “That flag is not diabetes. That flag is not a lot of things that kill us every day.”

Still, some candidates may try to use the flag issue to score points with black voters, said Cleveland Sellers, head of USC’s African-American Studies program.

“But we have a sophisticated African-American electorate,” Sellers said. “They will be looking to learn how the candidates will address a variety of issues.”

WARNING SNOOP RANT!

This is such a silly topic.
Although I think flying the confederate flag on top of any building including the fucken state capital building is just retarded.
Nobody can convince me that the confederate flag is anything more than an idiot racist redneck symbol, period.
And I don’t want to hear any “heritage” bullshit either.
Back in the day black folks would wear African symbols and Africa necklaces in addition to Malcolm X stuff, having never been to Africa and not knowing a damm thins about Malcolm X.
White rednecks sporting the flag do it only as a fashion accessory.
 
Shit we might as well be flying communist flags or Japanese battle flags over capitals.
But it’s obvious to me that the black folks down there can’t do shit about it.
The state is I believe 38% black, you mean they can’t put together enough political and economic pressure to remove the damm thing? That says to me that there are not enough black folks who give a shit about the issue.

But having said all of that presidential candidates who weigh in on the issue and say anything other than IT THE STATES RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE, are full of shit.
Nothing points out the utter bullshit mentality of Democrats than those who say the flag should be removed.
Talk about playing politics and being totally insincere.
Do any of you really believe that any white presidential candidate or any white person outside the state of South Carolina really gives a shit, c’mon. 

Sphere: Related Content

WELLINGTON, Ohio - An artist who was forced to remove his Nazi gingerbread men from the window of a hardware store has set up the display in an empty storefront in another town.

“The Secret Lives of Gingerbread Men” depicts a small gat