They said it: “man this dude is Krazy!” “you sir are an idiot” “you are a lunatic” “are you really black?”
This bitch is psychotic. The people who support this nutty retarded skank for president should be ashamed of themselves.
I’m seeing way too many people making excuses for her comment just like they did when she lied about the “sniper fire” crap.
I swear if something happens to Obama she would have to be at the top of the list of suspects.
Shocker!… Dems Scream Racism Over Republican Ad Then Are Busted Passing Out Bogus KKK Flyers!
This is suppose to be a racist ad…
Now, the Democrats and their lackeys in the media are screaming “RACISM!”
The New York Times reported:Hoping to hang on to a Congressional seat in a tight special election here on Tuesday, Republicans in this mostly white and very conservative district are trying to make the vote more a referendum on Senator Barack Obama than on the candidates themselves.
In advertisements and speeches, Republicans have repeatedly associated Travis Childers, the white Democrat threatening to take the seat away from the Republican Party, with Mr. Obama. Republicans say Mr. Obama’s liberal values are out of place in the district. But for many Democratic veterans here, the tactic is a throwback to the old and unwelcome politics of race, a standby in Mississippi campaigning.
Former Gov. William Winter, a Democrat, expressed shock at the current campaign.
“I am appalled that this blatant appeal to racial prejudice is still being employed,” said Mr. Winter, who lost the 1967 governor’s race after his segregationist opponent circulated handbills showing blacks listening to one of his speeches. Mr. Winter went on to win the governor’s office 12 years later.
MUCH MORE HERE…including the 411 on the flyer below being passed out by Democrats!
By Kathy Kiely and Jill Lawrence - LINKHillary Rodham Clinton vowed Wednesday to continue her quest for the Democratic nomination, arguing she would be the stronger nominee because she appeals to a wider coalition of voters — including whites who have not supported Barack Obama in recent contests.
“I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article “that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.”
“There’s a pattern emerging here,” she said.
Clinton’s blunt remarks about race came a day after primaries in Indiana and North Carolina dealt symbolic and mathematical blows to her White House ambitions. The Obama campaign, looking toward locking up the nomination, stepped up pressure on superdelegates who have the decisive votes in their race.
In both states, Clinton won six of 10 white voters, according to surveys of people as they left polling places.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton said that in Indiana, Obama split working-class voters with Clinton and won a higher percentage of white voters than in Ohio in March. He said Obama will be the strongest nominee because he appeals “to Americans from every background and all walks of life. These statements from Sen. Clinton are not true and frankly disappointing.”
Clinton rejected any idea that her emphasis on white voters could be interpreted as racially divisive. “These are the people you have to win if you’re a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that.”
Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said Clinton’s comment was a “poorly worded” variation on the way analysts have been “slicing and dicing the vote in racial terms.”
However, he said her primary support doesn’t prove she’s more electable. Either Democrat will get “the vast majority” of the other’s primary election votes in a general election, he said.
Clinton lost North Carolina by 15 percentage points and won Indiana by 2 points after competing full-out in both states. She had loaned the campaign $6.4 million in the past month. She said she might lend more.
“We should finish the contests we have and see where we stand after they’re over,” she said, referring to the six remaining primaries that will end June 3.
There were signs of unrest Wednesday, even among Clinton allies. California Sen. Dianne Feinstein wondered to The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper, “whether she can get the delegates that she needs.” Former South Dakota senator George McGovern, whose 1972 presidential bid gave Clinton her first political experience, switched his support from Clinton to Obama.
LISTEN HERE:
“No: the high percentage of blacks behind bars reflects crime rates, not bigotry.”
by Heather Mac Donald on City Journal
The race industry and its elite enablers take it as self-evident that high black incarceration rates result from discrimination. At a presidential primary debate this Martin Luther King Day, for instance, Senator Barack Obama charged that blacks and whites “are arrested at very different rates, are convicted at very different rates, [and] receive very different sentences . . . for the same crime.” Not to be outdone, Senator Hillary Clinton promptly denounced the “disgrace of a criminal-justice system that incarcerates so many more African-Americans proportionately than whites.”
If a listener didn’t know anything about crime, such charges of disparate treatment might seem plausible. After all, in 2006, blacks were 37.5 percent of all state and federal prisoners, though they’re under 13 percent of the national population. About one in 33 black men was in prison in 2006, compared with one in 205 white men and one in 79 Hispanic men. Eleven percent of all black males between the ages of 20 and 34 are in prison or jail. The dramatic rise in the prison and jail population over the last three decades—to 2.3 million people at the end of 2007 (see box)—has only amplified the racial accusations against the criminal-justice system.
The favorite culprits for high black prison rates include a biased legal system, draconian drug enforcement, and even prison itself. None of these explanations stands up to scrutiny. The black incarceration rate is overwhelmingly a function of black crime. Insisting otherwise only worsens black alienation and further defers a real solution to the black crime problem.
Racial activists usually remain assiduously silent about that problem. But in 2005, the black homicide rate was over seven times higher than that of whites and Hispanics combined, according to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. From 1976 to 2005, blacks committed over 52 percent of all murders in America. In 2006, the black arrest rate for most crimes was two to nearly three times blacks’ representation in the population. Blacks constituted 39.3 percent of all violent-crime arrests, including 56.3 percent of all robbery and 34.5 percent of all aggravated-assault arrests, and 29.4 percent of all property-crime arrests.
The advocates acknowledge such crime data only indirectly: by charging bias on the part of the system’s decision makers. As Obama suggested in the Martin Luther King debate, police, prosecutors, and judges treat blacks and whites differently “for the same crime.”
Let’s start with the idea that cops over-arrest blacks and ignore white criminals. In fact, the race of criminals reported by crime victims matches arrest data. As long ago as 1978, a study of robbery and aggravated assault in eight cities found parity between the race of assailants in victim identifications and in arrests—a finding replicated many times since, across a range of crimes. No one has ever come up with a plausible argument as to why crime victims would be biased in their reports.
Moving up the enforcement chain, the campaign against the criminal-justice system next claims that prosecutors overcharge and judges oversentence blacks. Obama describes this alleged postarrest treatment as “Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others.” Jena, Louisiana, of course, was where a D.A. initially lodged attempted second-degree murder charges against black students who, in December 2006, slammed a white student’s head against a concrete beam, knocking him unconscious, and then stomped and kicked him in the head while he was down. As Charlotte Allen has brilliantly chronicled in The Weekly Standard, a local civil rights activist crafted a narrative linking the attack to an unrelated incident months earlier, in which three white students hung two nooses from a schoolyard tree—a display that may or may not have been intended as a racial provocation. This entrepreneur then embellished the tale with other alleged instances of redneck racism—above all, the initial attempted-murder charges. An enthusiastic national press responded to the bait exactly as intended, transforming the “Jena Six” into victims rather than perpetrators. In the seven months of ensuing headlines and protests, Jena became a symbol of systemic racial unfairness in America’s court system. If blacks were disproportionately in prison, the refrain went, it was because they faced biased prosecutors—like the one in Jena—as well as biased juries and judges.
Backing up this bias claim has been the holy grail of criminology for decades—and the prize remains as elusive as ever. In 1997, criminologists Robert Sampson and Janet Lauritsen reviewed the massive literature on charging and sentencing. They concluded that “large racial differences in criminal offending,” not racism, explained why more blacks were in prison proportionately than whites and for longer terms. A 1987 analysis of Georgia felony convictions, for example, found that blacks frequently received disproportionately lenient punishment. A 1990 study of 11,000 California cases found that slight racial disparities in sentence length resulted from blacks’ prior records and other legally relevant variables. A 1994 Justice Department survey of felony cases from the country’s 75 largest urban areas discovered that blacks actually had a lower chance of prosecution following a felony than whites did and that they were less likely to be found guilty at trial. Following conviction, blacks were more likely to receive prison sentences, however—an outcome that reflected the gravity of their offenses as well as their criminal records.
Another criminologist—easily as liberal as Sampson—reached the same conclusion in 1995: “Racial differences in patterns of offending, not racial bias by police and other officials, are the principal reason that such greater proportions of blacks than whites are arrested, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned,” Michael Tonry wrote in Malign Neglect. (Tonry did go on to impute malign racial motives to drug enforcement, however.) The media’s favorite criminologist, Alfred Blumstein, found in 1993 that blacks were significantly underrepresented in prison for homicide compared with their presence in arrest.
This consensus hasn’t made the slightest dent in the ongoing search for systemic racism. An entire industry in the law schools now dedicates itself to flushing out prosecutorial and judicial bias, using ever more complicated statistical artillery. The net result? A few new studies show tiny, unexplained racial disparities in sentencing, while other analyses continue to find none. Any differences that do show up are trivially small compared with the exponentially greater rates of criminal offending among blacks. No criminologist would claim, moreover, to have controlled for every legal factor that affects criminal-justice outcomes, says Patrick Langan, former senior statistician for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prosecutors and judges observe the heinousness of a defendant’s conduct, for example, but a number-crunching researcher has no easy way to discover and quantify that variable.
Some criminologists replace statistics with High Theory in their search for racism. The criminal-justice system does treat individual suspects and criminals equally, they concede. But the problem is how society defines crime and criminals. Crime is a social construction designed to marginalize minorities, these theorists argue. A liberal use of scare quotes is virtually mandatory in such discussions, to signal one’s distance from primitive notions like “law-abiding” and “dangerous.” Arguably, vice crimes are partly definitional (though even there, the law enforcement system focuses on them to the extent that they harm communities). But the social constructivists are talking about all crime, and it’s hard to see how one could “socially reconstruct” assault or robbery so as to convince victims that they haven’t been injured.
Sphere: Related ContentFound this on Olbermann Watch
Olbermann is such a fucken moronic jackass…
Deplorable Keith Olbermann attacked Rush Limbaugh for a supposed racial “insult”, dutifully parroted from one of Olby’s usual blue blog “news” sources (Think Propaganda). Krazy Keith was up in arms, making Limbaugh “worst person in the world” for his heinous, racist slur against a Hispanic office holder. Oralmann seems to have forgotten his own history, like when he called the Hispanic Attorney General a “house boy”. Unfortunately for Bathtub Boy, Olbermann Watch didn’t forget:
Dean argued that the use of Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) former pastor Jeremiah Wright in GOP ads in local races is “race baiting.”
####
10) “I think with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, you can’t play, you know, hide the salami, or whatever it’s called.” –urging President Bush to make public Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers’s White House records
9) “You know, the Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people. They’re a pretty monolithic party. Pretty much, they all behave the same, and they all look the same. … It’s pretty much a white Christian party.” –speaking about the lack of outreach to minority communities by political parties
8) “I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks.”
7) “I’m a metrosexual.” –employing the buzz phrase for straight men who are in touch with their feminine sides, then later admitting he didn’t know what the term means
6) “We’ve gotten rid of (Saddam Hussein), and I suppose that’s a good thing.”
5) “The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong.”
4) “This president is not interested in being a good president.
He’s interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father.”
3) “Now that we’re on dog pee, we can have an interesting conversation about that. I do not recommend drinking urine…but if you drink water straight from the river, you have a greater chance of getting an infection than you do if you drink urine.” —teaching an eight-grade science class in La Crosse, Wisconsin
2) “You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever and get home and still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well Republicans, I guess can do that. Because a lot of them have never made an honest living in their lives.”
1) “Not only are we going to New Hampshire … we’re going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we’re going to California and Texas and New York! And we’re going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we’re going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!” –Iowa concession speech
Sphere: Related Content
A great example of how stupid and racist liberals are…
Here’s another thing I don’t like about this primary: now that there are only two Democratic candidates, it’s suddenly horribly absolutely crystal-clear that this is an election about gender and race. This may have always been true, but weeks ago it wasn’t so obvious — once upon a time there were eight candidates, and although six of them withered away, their presence in the campaign managed to obscure things. Even around the time of Ohio, when there were primarily three candidates, the outlines were murky, because Edwards was still in there, picking up votes from all sectors.But now there are two and we’re facing Pennsylvania and whom are we kidding? This is an election about whether the people of Pennsylvania hate blacks more than they hate women. And when I say people, I don’t mean people, I mean white men.
How ironic is this? After all this time, after all these stupid articles about how powerless white men are and how they can’t even get into college because of overachieving women and affirmative action and mean lady teachers who expected them to sit still in the third grade even though they were all suffering from terminal attention deficit disorder — after all this, they turn out (surprise!) to have all the power. (As they always did, by the way; I hope you didn’t believe any of those articles.)
Read the rest on the Huffington Post by Nora Ephron
Sphere: Related ContentI found this on Barking Moonbat -
(link) Hip-hop star Snoop Dogg has launched a scathing attack on U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama, accusing him of gleaning support from the Ku Klux Klan.The rapper, real name Calvin Broadus Jr., insists the Democratic candidate has received funding from the KKK.
He tells the Guardian, “The KKK gave Obama money. They was (sic) one of his biggest supporters … Why wouldn’t they be? The media won’t tell you that. They don’t want you to know that. They just want you to know that this [bleep] befriended this other [bleep] who be (sic) threatening your values.
“But we all know all presidents lie to get into [bleep] office. That’s they (sic) job.”
But Snoop insists Obama will still emerge victorious in the upcoming presidential elections. He adds, “In America’s eyes, that mutha[bleep]’s gonna be president ‘cos (John) McCain can’t [bleep] with him. Hillary (Clinton) can’t [bleep] with him. He’s winning over white people, white ladies.”
“There may be many things that are marks on Obama.. but the claim that he is being supported by the KKK seems a bit out there and possibly only a position somebody totally wasted on drugs could come up with….”
Well not to knock good drugs, but the KKK supporting Obama is not a stretch. I have been questioning for a couple of years now why Obama back in the day would go campaign and raise money for Robert KKK Byrd. Hell if the KKK is sending dead presidents to Obama it’s the least they can do.
I have been bitching about this forever, despite overwhelming support from black folks for Obama, no black journalist, columnist, TV Pundit, somebody anybody ask him why he (Obama) would help raise money for a fucken racist!!
I bet still, today less than 1% of black folks who are supporting Obama know he campaigned for a former Klansman.
I don’t know if Snoop Dog knows it, but what’s that saying about politics and strange bedfellows…
#########
Remember when the magic Negro went to West Virginia and pimped for Senator Robert “KKK” Byrd. Yes I know it’s an old story to us GOP types, but I thought it was a good time to recycle this old piece of 411.I was telling some friends about this and they did not believe me. I’m amazed at just how few people still don’t know about this, including Obama supporters.I know this is old, but just posting as a reminder since the media is continuing to prop up this articulate darkie. Just a reminder to Democrats as they push for change.
These folks are not sold on the Magic Negro; (Obama: No Cash From Denzel, Spike, Motown, Despite Oprah Backing) It tis going to be interesting the race gloves come off. Hillary is certain to start uttering code phrases in the coming weeks where she will basically say it tis not a good idea to elect someone with so little “experience,” she will add some code “can we take a chance of putting a “N-g-e-r at the top of the Democrat Party ticket?” But we will know what she really means. LOL!
Sphere: Related ContentVeteran racist Robert Byrd — the senile Senator who has spent his overlong career keeping blacks in “their place” by recruiting for the KKK, by filibustering the Civil Rights Act for 14 straight hours, by making a fool of himself by trying to block the nomination of the supremely qualified Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State, by participating in the “high-tech lynching” of Clarence Thomas as well as opposing the nomination of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court, by publicly calling people “niggers” as recently as 2001, by declaring that he would rather “die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels” — has a new advocate: Barack “Osama bin Osama” Obama, a fellow Senator and, as it happens, a “race mongrel.”Needless to say, any Republican with a resume like Byrd’s would be treated like a leper — especially by fellow Republicans. But the big D in “D-WV” deflects all sins from the Democratic Party’s point of view. There have been Democrats morally depraved enough to refer to Byrd as the “conscience of the Senate” without smirking. Obama is evidently shameless enough to go along with it.
Visit Ace of Spades HQ to read Obama’s letter to the true believers who make up MoveOn.org on behalf of the windy old ex-Kleagle’s reelection campaign. Obama lays it on pretty thick, crediting the bloviating obstructionist with upholding the highest of principles by using his favorite tactic — the filibuster — to circumvent the Constitution’s requirement that judges be approved by a simple majority. The original letter of course has a link where you can send money to buy Byrd a fresh set of sheets.
Meanwhile, for advocating a color-blind approach to justice, Clarence Thomas is often called an “Uncle Tom.” Colin Powell is characterized as a “plantation slave” for serving in a Republican Administration.
The Republican Party, as apparently too few people know, was founded largely on the issue of opposition to slavery — and has remained true to the principle of individual liberty regardless of race to this day. Last time I checked, there weren’t any ex-Kleagles on the Republican side of the aisle.
Sphere: Related ContentAn anti-white and virulently anti-Semitic black supremacist party has once again endorsed Sen. Barack Obama on the presidential candidate’s own website, WND has learned.
Following criticism earlier this month of an online endorsement from the New Black Panther Party, or NBPP, Obama’s campaign removed the controversial organization from the presidential candidate’s official website. The NBPP had been a registered team member and blogger on Obama’s “MyObama” campaign site.
But the NBPP endorsement was reposted on Obama’s official website today.
“Obama is capable of stirring the ‘melting pot’ into a better ‘molten America,’” states the NBPP endorsement posted on Obama’s site.
The NBPP is a controversial black extremist party whose leaders are notorious for their racist statements and for leading anti-white activism.Malik Zulu Shabazz, NBPP national chairman, who has given scores of speeches condemning “white men” and Jews, confirmed his organization’s endorsement of Obama in a recent interview with WND.“I think the way Obama responded to the attack on him and the attempt to sabotage his campaign shows true leadership and character. He had a chance to denounce his pastor and he didn’t fall for the bait. He stood up and addressed real issues of racial discord,” stated Shabazz.
Shabazz boasted he met Obama last March when the politician attended the 42nd anniversary of the voting rights marches in Selma, Ala.
“I have nothing but respect for Obama and for his pastor,” said Shabazz, referring to Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s pastor of nearly 20 years.
The President appointed four members today to the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board, which selects students, scholars, teachers, and trainees to participate in educational exchanges as Fulbright scholars. It also finances educational activities for Americans abroad and for foreign citizens in the United States and promotes American studies in foreign countries and foreign language training and area training in the United States. The Board is comprised of 12 members, appointed by the President. The new members appointed today are Victoria Murphy of Maine, Hoyt Purvis of Arkansas, Robert Rose of Connecticut, and Lee Williams of Arkansas.“Like many Arkansans, I have long regarded Senator William Fulbright as both a role model and a mentor,” said the President. “The Fulbright scholarships are his most lasting achievement.
Bill Clinton
For most of his life and public service, Fulbright was a supporter of racial segregation. He signed The Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision. He subsequently joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as voting against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
411 Video - (no audio)
[Clinton’s] Dancing with Segregationists - By Mark Levin - December 20, 2002 - In case y’all did not know or forgot…
Some disturbing historical facts.
1. Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67, when Fulbright was still a segregationist. Fulbright became Clinton’s “mentor.” By comparison, Lott worked for a segregationist congressman.
2. In April 1985, Governor Bill Clinton signed Act 985 into law, making the birthdates of Martin Luther King Jr. (the preeminent leader of the civil-rights movement) and Robert E. Lee (the general who led the Confederate army) state holidays on the same day. Of course, the word “segregation” never passed Clinton’s considerable lips, but the (uncoded) message he was sending to certain of his white constituents could not have be clearer. His support for the Lee day seems as bad — if not worse — than a gaffe at an old man’s birthday party and Lott’s opposition to an MLK day.
Lott’s 1983 vote against making King’s birthday a national holiday — which he opposed for reasons other than race (as did Warren Rudman) — is now said by some to be further evidence of his racism or insensitivity to race.
3. Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue of his own. Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
(a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
(b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
(c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law. And we know why, don’t we? He didn’t want to offend certain of his constituents.
4. Newsmax.com recently reminded us that in her 1998 book, Lift Every Voice, Lani Guinier wrote of another disturbing event involving Clinton. She stated, in part:
In the late 1980’s, in a particularly tense meeting in southeastern Arkansas — a section of the Mississippi Delta region where antebellum social relations are still in many respects the order of the day — Dayna [Cunningham] and a local [NAACP Legal Defense Fund] cooperating lawyer were part of a handful of black people there to discuss remedies for a highly contentious [Legal Defense Fund] voting rights suit.
The meeting turned sour when one of the local whites demanded to know why, in his view, the whites were always made to pay for others’ problems. Other whites in the group began to echo his charge. . . .
Bill Clinton, the lead defendant in the case, took to the podium to respond. In a tone of resignation, Clinton said, “We have to pay because we lost.”
“Clinton had so irresponsibly pandered to the backwards feeling of the white constituency,” Cunningham told Guinier.
Clinton’s “we lost” comment referred to the South losing the Civil War. Let’s imagine if the South had won the Civil War. Among other things, was Clinton endorsing segregation, or much worse? Yes, I know, what a “dumb” suggestion, albeit made to demonstrate the selective moral outrage surrounding Lott’s comments.
The truth is that during much of his political career, Clinton has been dancing with segregationists. But Mr. Beinart assumed Clinton hadn’t, so he didn’t bother to investigate, or he simply didn’t want to know, or he simply dismissed the evidence. And herein lies the hypocrisy.
Sphere: Related ContentFrom Moonbattery
From yesterday’s Anchorage Daily News:
Vandals dumped a bucket of red paint on a downtown veterans memorial this morning, the fifth anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, in what police suspect was a symbolic act of protest. Passers-by spotted the blood-toned paint on the Anchorage Veterans Memorial, in the Delaney Park Strip off I Street, during the morning commute and reported it to police. The soldier’s helmet was blood red, with the paint dripping down to the ground below. […]
The statue was cleaned off by early afternoon, with only a hint of a reddish hue staining the greening copper shaped into a soldier holding a carbine. The blood-colored paint stained the snow beneath a placard that is part of the monument: “To those Alaska veterans whose eyes have seen what the protected will never know.”
Another one to file under “But They Support the Troops.”
*********
Also check out: New Black Panthers Endorse Obama
I have read Chris’s response to me several times and I will freely admit I am not processing it as well as I should.
He does not understand my resistance to Obama and I can’t help but think, “why would he or anybody else care about my resistance to Obama?”
So, I’ll muddle through this as best I can, but it will no doubt seem disjointed to some. You can blame it on the lingering effects of my ass kicking flu or my increasing irritation with the news media and America’s new found racial enlightenment all because Barrack Hussein Obama was feeling the pressure of anti-American backlash because he decided to attend a church to give him street credibility while at the same time embracing an over the top whitey-America hating Pastor. Folks maybe it tis just me, being a black dude, conservative minded, independent thinking, beat of thy own drummer cranky ranting fuck who just sees the mud and dirt all over every damn aspect of American politics.
Chris won’t listen to me as much as Obama, because I don’t agree with him. I marvel at how much knowledge white folks seem to absorb when they are lectured by a “favorable” and acceptable darkie with whom they agree and want to grant some sort of Jesus status.
My resistance to Obama is no different than my resistance of damn near any presidential candidate. I just don’t hold the office of president as high a regard as the vast majority of Americans.
While speaking to one of my student interns the other day he asked me what I looked for in a president. Basically I told him, nothing, not a damn thing. I don’t want my president to do a damn thing, I don’t want he or she to say anything, I want them to just occupy the space, don’t fuck shit up, don’t push any red buttons or try to fix anything. I want them to vacation hard and long. Bottom line; just keep you fucken mouth shut and try not to do anything too stupid. Is that asking too much?
For as long as I can remember I have regarded the presidency as a middle management position basically because the smarter the president tended to be the more likely they were to fuck shit up.
I don’t want my president to fix health care, I don’t want my president trying to “create” jobs. That tis not what they do. I don’t want my president trying to fix race relations, or trying to cure world hunger, or spreading democracy or being the world’s fucken police.
What about Iraq, Snoop, (sigh). Well being in Iraq and the Middle East was inevitable. Being in Iraq is a necessary evil and folks on both sides of the political divide are on the same page about how badly it got screwed up. However, to appease the monkeys on both sides of the political animal cages politicians throw out withdrawal timetables on one hand while the other growls about “finishing the job” and “keep
America safe.” We are in Iraq because we needed a place to park troops
– To keep a closer eye on the oil and the many nut jobs in the region.
My resistance to Obama is the same resistance I would have to any Democrat. I don’t care what race the candidate is, he’s still a Democrat.
Democrats believe in their soul that their destiny is to “fix” America and its citizens and to “fix” society. Candidates like Obama and Hillary are caught up with this inherent need to shine a light on American society’s dark underbelly and expose the wretched evils of our society.
So what if I don’t think it is all the evil, when compared to the rest of the world and history? It’s not perfect, but it is sure not nearly as evil or broken as the Democrats want us to believe!
People like my friend Chris are caught up in the “Hope-nosis” (patent pending) that Democrat campaigns tend to engage in. They are buying the snake oil and do not even want to discuss the ingredients.
I am keenly aware that I am far more critical of Negros and Obama than I am of whitey. This is because I genuinely care more about what happens to Negros. That is, I care whether or not they’re valuing education as highly as they should, whether they’re pushing themselves and their children to be the best and not wallowing in excuses or hurling unfounded 
charges of racism. Whether a person actually suffered from
racial discrimination or not, there are those who urge conduct that will always “keep whitey on the hook.” It seems to serve Negros well to blame whitey and say “see what you did to us?” That’s a handy excuse and I for one am sick of it being used all the time for everything.
Negros have this unwritten rule that we are not allowed to let whitey forget our historical grievances, whether an individual white person was guilty of discrimination or not. Most whites seem intimidated by blacks who do this. This race hustle perpetuated by the Sharpton’s of the world is profitable and effective. It is the one card we can play from cradle to grave and it gives Negro pundits a voice on liberal media talk shows.
Folks although I have given my examples of racism and unfairness I just can’t sit here all the fucken time and rant all the fucken time about whitey and the evils processed in their minds or the ignoble deeds done to Blacks. Why use this blog to bitch and moan about slavery, institutional racism and other crap?
I would rather use my blog to keep Negros on the hook. It just suits me.
I hate weakness and self loathing. It just irritates the shit out of me. And it does nothing to improve individual’s lives.
People want to blame other people for the mess they find around them. It is easier to look outward instead of working on self. Just look at the cheering from the crowd at Pastor Wrights sermons. I’m thinking “what the fuck were they cheering about?” For me, telling each other (or whites) how racist whites have been and still are is, in my estimation, just counterproductive and silly.
Just as the cheering was after the O.J. Simpson verdict, “we beat whitey hooray,” like a bunch of silly ass ghetto clowns. I remember being so utterly embarrassed after the announcement of the verdict I wanted to crawl in a hole for a week.
I just may be totally off base on this but if there are whites out there who are actively trying to fuck black people just for the hell of it then they are suffering from massive retardation. No matter how prejudiced you might be, you will WANT black folks to succeed if for no other reason then it helps you! If you have any sense you will want
the least of those in our beloved society to succeed or else YOU will be paying for them either through welfare or the criminal justice system.
True conservative minded folks will not systematically try to fuck those on the lower tiers of society, it is just stupid. Only the literacy and mentally challenged redneck inflicted persons in our society seek to specifically dis Negros and other minorities.
I don’t grant too much give a shit status to idiot fuck white people who want to perpetuate racial divisions so I choose not to engage in Rev J. Wright nigga speech calling out whitey dissing them on the one hand while investing your money with them.
His hatred was phony, just as most Nigga hatred is.
If I wanted Niggas to come to this blog all I would have to do is rant about honkey this and honkey that and spitting out black power platitudes to get welfare monkeys all fired up while at the same time voting for Democrats and bowing to them like a bunch of ignorant slaves.
Like it or not we are all in this together. I just think that Negroes need to be reminded, constantly, of our responsibility in this mess.
For example, as we all know, black crime statistics are outrageous, especially considering our proportion of the population. Rarely, if ever, do you hear black people expressing disgust for out-of-control crime rates or lecturing other blacks about their responsibility to stay out of the criminal justice system. (As Chris says finger wagging) Why?
Why have Pastor Wright bitch about the fact that blacks make up a disproportionate percentage of the prison population when the simple thing to do is to stay the fuck out of jail. I’m sorry people, but I have little of no sympathy for criminal Negros. I won’t be stealing from my neighbors, I’m not selling crack to your kids, and I have no interest in stealing your car or flat screen TV. If I can avoid that conduct, so can you!
I have yet to hear in my 44 years on this earth how whitey is the blame for a Negro stealing a case of Heineken while the streets of New Orleans floods. Black New Orleans police officers were stealing from Walmart, on camera! How is whitey to blame for that bit of human frailty?
Obama wants us to buy into the fact that your only path to success is the have Gubment bigger, better and unchecked. He - as do all Democrats — panders to parasites. Democrat power is directly derived from how many people he can keep under his wing.
Democrats believe in segmenting America his speech outlined it perfectly skin color preferences. Affirmative action was intended to include more blacks in the candidate pool, and keep racist white people in check. Now it has become the biggest entitlement program ever conceived. It has nothing to do with so-called racial discrimination and everything to do with 
lowered standards. What it does is tell people they can succeed without jumping through the same hoops everyone else must go through. With that mind set, Negros see no need to attend school. Which in turn prevents them from qualifying for jobs that they could do!
We freely give whitey the ammunition to say, “you niggers are too dumb to get a job on your own, you need gubment help.” Negros are not embarrassed by this. I don’t get. I have never been able to comprehend it. Negros celebrate “victimhood” and are gleeful when whitey is forced to atone for 400 years of racist tendencies. But they won’t do
whatever it takes to improve their own lives, without anyone else’s or Democrats help.
Shit, I have been fucked by employment discrimination numerous times because there were just some white people who were too stupid to see a good employment candidate when they saw one. It happens.
Apparently, it’s difficult to find black job candidates and potential university students with credentials comparable to whitey. On the one hand, some blacks claim that credentials are comparable, but whites need a “push” to hire or admit. On the other hand, some blacks claim that “comparable” is relative. Just because a black person has a lower score, it doesn’t mean he’s not qualified for a job or admission. It is reasonable, however, to set hiring and admissions criteria, and if your score is below the threshold, you are, by those standards, not qualified. Unfortunately, some blacks, not all thank goodness, see racial motives behind every damn thing. I still see affirmative action as simply immoral, unconstitutional, embarrassingly unfair, and undignified.
If blacks with comparable credentials are being passed over, blanket skin color preference policies are not the remedy. If blacks are passed over because they don’t have comparable scores, we need to address the problem at a much earlier stage. We all know what idiot owned government schools have become. Get the socialist fucks out of the front offices and demand better for your kids. Fight for school choice, support rigorous standards, and advocate excellence, not mediocrity, but stop making excuses. Beat your bad ass children; turn off your TV and study.
Embrace and reward studious behavior and penalize stupidity and laziness.
I have a daughter and a nephew who are gleaming examples of kids, who were raised in two parent households who were raised with morals and a basic American work ethic, and both gleaming examples of personal “individual” failure. It was not whitey fucking them over, whitey did not chain the school doors shut; whitey did not prevent them from learning and completing their education. The Klan did not force my daughter to get pregnant or made my nephew’s teacher give him multiple F’s on his report card. BUT Obama and Democrats and J Wright will lead you to believe that whitey doomed these kids, plez!
Despite government policies designed to “force” equal outcomes, thanks to human nature, that shit ain’t going to happen. We each have different or varying degrees of talent, drive, and motivation. This is where “diversity” bites liberals on the ass.
In a society as diverse as America, individuals will never have equal shit. You won’t find equal outcomes within the same biological family, so how can you expect to find it within a diverse country?
I have said often that far too many black people have this fucken team mentality when it comes to living in American society. I’m not on some fucken “Negro” team! Sure, I want the best for some of my brothas as sistas! But black folks act like just because a mixed race Negro is running for president I should be supportive.
In case some of you liberals who gushed over Obama’s speech did not know, all of us Negroes here in America are of “mixed heritage,” with the blood of slaves and slave owners. There is not a Black in America (who has slave ancestors) that is not mixed race. And more whites then you know probably have Black relatives! So we need to stop focusing on skin tone or the mother country of people and start looking at the character of the person. That’s what MLK advised us to do.
Despite Obama’s bullshit, I don’t think its America’s collective responsibility to take the lead in pulling up Negroes out of this perceived societal racist haze; it starts with the man or woman in the mirror. Whether you choose to be a lazy dependent retard or some homeless slug your individual choices determine your path.
I will always reject out of hand any presidential candidate who promotes himself or herself as an agent of change and “hope,” and sees themselves as some self proclaimed instrument of God. God is God. Not any human being. OB is not a rock star or the savior of the country. He is just one more politician running for President. And those who can’t get past his race to see what he really stands for (which is not much different from most other politicians) is guilty of discrimination themselves. They are treating him better then he deserves simply because they are aware of his race. And I object to that.
Sphere: Related Content
Have you heard? There’s a black man on the cover of the April 2008 Vogue. (Richard Gere and George Clooney are the only other men ever to be on the cover, reports Time magazine.)Vogue does not have a history of embracing African-Americans on its covers. Back in November, Portfolio’s Jeff Bercovici pointed out that while 4 out of 12 covers of Men’s Vogue had black men; when Jennifer Hudson hit the cover of Vogue last March, she was only the third African-American celebrity to do so, though the magazine was founded in 1914.
But on the cover of new issue, Cleveland Cavaliers forward LeBron James seems to be embodying ugly stereotypes about black men: The wild, savage, white-woman-obsessed beast.
Sphere: Related Content
Senator Hillary Clinton has apologized to black voters due to the controversy surrounding the widely-condemned comments of now-resigned unapologetic campaign official Geraldine Ferraro, who basically said Obama is where he is because he is black.News reports say Clinton’s speech was an uncharacteristically long and heartfelt apology.
But some are bound to note that it once again shoves the issue of Obama as an African-American into the news cycle. There have been accusations that this is why there have been so many instances of Clinton campaign associates raising the issue, then apologizing and resigning: to raise the issue and keep it in the news cycle. Either that or it’s an issue they simply can’t help hinting at or– in Ferraro’s case — all but discussing it complete with Al Gore-style slide show.
Before you read my rant watch Keith Olbermann go off on Ferraro and Hillary. This is the first time I actually agreed with this dude on anything.
This race shit if the Democrats don’t fix it will doom the party. Now nothing would make me happier, BUT, although I am a conservative I still function with the mindset that for America to be a strong nation both sides of the political divide must field quality competent individuals and let the battle of ideas decide the direction of the country.
Although watching the Clinton campaign circle the drain with their racial mudslinging and identity politics is amusing it is not good for the nation.
Having this skank ass old white bitch Ferraro sounding off like David Duke is a further reminder of why my comments below are more correct than not.
***********
***********
I have to rant about this to remind myself why I named this blog Political Party Poop.
I read on some obscure blog by this dude trying to explain this racial mess the Democrats are in regarding the racial civil war between Hillary and Obama.
He states that we have three choices for president; a white dude, an aging white lady and a middle aged black dude and your choice basically lies with who you identify with the most.
Reading not only his statement but others basically babbling about the notion that we pick our political leaders simply based on physical characteristics is more than a little disturbing.
This particular dude is a Hillary supporter, but he does like Obama and he is trying to grasp (as is Geraldine Ferraro) how this relatively unknown black dude can be so close to the presidency. They wonder how did this Negro slip through the cracks of the Democratic Party machine.
Let me tell you why I find Ferraro’s comments over the top offensive.
First she used the same comment to describe the Jackson campaign years ago. Uppity ass white people - when trying to explain their racist tendencies towards black folks who manage to break through the racist haze - must somehow try to explain how that nigga was able to get that position, whether it is a political position, work or business related.
As Shelby Steele pointed out, all of us black folks must wear the survival masks to muck our way through society. Some of us are just better at playing the game then others.
I have been in countless situations where I have been the only black individual who was part of some major project, or chaired some committee or organization. And I have heard, via friends, that rednecks questioned my participation and my “standing.” They wanted to know what I brought to the table. Besides my blackness that is.
I mentioned in a post long ago that when I first got the job I now occupy, my predecessor who could not perform the job because he did not have the technical skills, asked me point blank when I met him, “what is your background, what are your qualifications for this position” before we even finished our handshake. I wanted to punch the mutherfucker.
What white person do you know, who has a job position, high paid or high profile, would be asked by someone “how’d the fuck did you get this gig?” I’m thinking “I don’t know, I FUCKEN APPLIED FOR THE POSITION.”
Unfortunately that would not be the last time individuals would take a double take when I told them my current job title.
Again it has nothing to do with anything other than perception. If I were a fucken delivery driver or some other common laborer, if I were sweeping the floors of my lovely facility nobody would blink and eye.
That is what this racist world expects of a black man.
Shit I work on a campus, your typical liberal bastion of educational endeavors and except for some black folks in such fields as African-American studies there are no black people around here. Hell there is only one black dude working in the entire campus maintenance department. Niggas can’t even get a job cutting the grass here. There are not even black folks working in the mess halls. I know we are a small percentage of the total population in Kansas, but I am convinced that there would be more blacks hired if the employers did not know our race before they made the decision.
I must say there is one black provost who is the head of campus technology. Must have been a quota hire. See, that is why people like Ferraro and her ilk assume that any black had help to get to a higher level.
Now keep in mind folks, my job don’t pay jack but I am responsible for the care for a high profile facility and they gave me the biggest fanciest office in the place, and perhaps in the whole town. When folks, particularly old white folks ask and when I tell them my job title more than a few people have asked me “how did you get this job?”
I have to wonder, would they ask that question if I were white? I don’t think so!
Shit if blacks are seen on college campuses white folks automatically think “affirmative action.” Same thing if we are in the corporate world. More than a few of us have endured the “quota” hire rant.
Every damn time black folks manage to achieve their little tiny piece of the pie, people like Ferraro, and especially old white people, need to attach the “well he or she must be a nigga quota hire or appointment.”
I have no plan to vote for Obama, because he is a closet Socialist and a flaming liberal. I don’t give a fuck what your color or background he is, if I find your particular brand of politics offensive I won’t vote for you and I damn sure can’t identify with you.
At Mrs. Snoops’ birthday dinner party the other night I was explaining to a friend, my still held belief that all of the Obama hype is fleeting, that white people when it comes time to vote will not pull the lever or tap the touch screen for a black dude particularly a black man.
Let me be even more specific, I seriously doubt that any Asian or relatively few Mexicans will vote for him, Mexicans don’t like black people, don’t get along with them. Most Mexicans would send black folks back to Africa faster than Robert Byrd.
That is why I have no problem voicing my disdain for illegal immigration. These Mexicans are not coming over here to become “American citizens.” They want their fucken country back and assimilating with the gringos, while stooping to mowing their lawns, making up hotel beds and building backyard decks for a few dollars an hour is just the ticket to keep the gringos at ease. Yea, I know, I’m stereo typing. I learned it from whitey!
I’m still not convinced, particularly with the heightened racial tensions that continue to boil over, that there is a significant enough number of white people who will put this nation in the hands of a black dude.
He needs 52 or 53 million people must win the majority of white men. He cannot win if no other racial or ethnic group is going to largely vote for a Negro.
Talks about racial identity! Scores of white people have little or no ongoing contact with black folks. Don’t work with any, don’t socialize with any, never dated a Negro, never went to grade school with one and more than likely never attend college with a Negro.
There are few if any positive black role models on TV and in the movies.
Sunday political talk shows are crammed with talking head old white people, all major radio broadcast talk shows on the right or left are by white folks.
Few influential black folks in the major news media and of course the majority of today’s decision makers are mostly white.
Still, today a white father’s worst nightmare is to have his lovely daughter marrying a Negro. That is still morally repugnant in the minds of way too many rednecks.
I’m black and my “Negro” friends all live on the east and west coasts. I can go days and not see another Negro in my humble little progressive (read liberal) town.
After all of that - you people want to still try and convince me that enough white people will say “fuck it” and hand the keys to the White House to a black dude? Oh I forgot to mention that a great number of white people are still trying to hand the Muslim tag around his neck.
“Gee won’t it be peachy keen to have a Negro as president?” Seriously folks I would need to smoke some really good weed to process that reality.
“But Snoop what about the primaries and the fact that he won white states like Vermont and Iowa” Look, I don’t discount Hillary hatred.
Obama is winning over the more educated and progressive white folks. The more education a given white person has the more likely they are to support Obama, because any rational thinking person would never consider Hillary, which is why she is most popular with lower middle class white folks particularly poor white women and old white women.
If on election night I am wrong I will have no problem admitting it.
Back to Obama. This black dude represents the hopes and dreams for black folks that somehow his presidency will transform niggas into more productive citizens when that is just a pipe dream. Yea. Right.
At the dinner party - and I have told Mrs. Snoop and others this many times - I said that nothing pisses me off more that to have someone tell me that Obama’s potential presidency will somehow transform me, I guess since I’m a black dude. On inauguration day somehow I will become a slightly better human being. I will suddenly be accepted for who I am without regard for my race. Fuck that. No magic negro is going to wave the magic wand and make the racists all think well of a black man!
Now I can see through the political crap and do often ridicule Obama’s ascendancy to the presidency, but when people like that fuck Ferraro feel that it is her obligation to remind the masses that your support of this unqualified Negro is “foolish” it is more than a bit insulting.
A nigger at the top of the Democratic ticket “that is just outrageous!”
It’s only because dude is black. Yup it tis funny that a great number of white people, mostly politically ignorant young people who see a vote for Obama as a vote against the man. Never mind that nobody reached the presidency has ever gotten there without dealing with “the man.” He will become “the man” and not much will really change!
Obama leading the Democrat presidential race was Howard Dean’s worst nightmare.
I would hope that black folks will continue to keep a close tab on the future racist statements that will come from the mouths of various Democrats. Hopefully black folks will finally start to comprehend that neither political party has a monopoly on your well being and by continuing to vote Democrat they give creative license to people like Ferraro.
When Ferraro was supposedly fighting for Negros as a politician, she saw herself as the slave master. All Democrats see black folks this way.
They are just simply tools to achieve political power. And how dare we not do things according to their master plan for us!?
They (the Ferraro’s of the world) never envisioned a time where some stray Negro would usurp their rightful place at the top of this countries political ivory towers.
Left-wing paternalists regard themselves as architects of racial progress, guarding and guiding blacks along the path of success — a role in which they assume to stand forever at the head of the march. But what happens when blacks overtake their enlightened white helpers? All hell breaks loose and the mask of progress drops to reveal the stricken faces of the white avant-garde .Geraldine Ferraro’s remarks confirm that beneath left-wing paternalism lurks considerable racism. “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” she said to the Daily Breeze. “He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”Since liberalism is not based upon natural justice but willfulness, it never fails to devour its supposed beneficiaries. Ferraro’s condescension captures the tone of paternalistic liberalism perfectly. Its “victims” should know their place and plot their ascent according to the progressive charts set up by the white liberal establishment.
We’ll let you know, Barack, when it is your time to win — that’s been the tacit theme of the Clinton campaign all along. Such is the generosity of Lady Bountiful she’ll even let him serve as her apprentice in the VP chair for eight years.
But chaos has erupted and the plantation progressives don’t know what to do, except to blurt out pent-up racial resentments. Then, the victims, whom they spent the last few decades training in hair-trigger racial sensitivity, turn on them in righteous fury, detecting nuances of racism in everything from Andrew Cuomo’s description of Obama’s press conferences as “shuck and jive” events to Bill Clinton’s belittling Jesse Jackson comparison to Ferraro’s sniffing at his “luck.”
IF, AS FERRARO SAYS, the country is “caught up in the concept” of embracing an unqualified black president, that’s because she and her friends propagandized Americans in that notion a long time ago. Ferraro’s whining is the grousing of a propagandist whose student has surpassed her.
Read full article By George Neumayr on the American Spectator
Sphere: Related Content