VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

When Black America failed Black Americans

Thursday, August 24th, 2006

spike2.jpgWhen I first heard about Spike Lee’s documentary on the Katrina disaster, I expected it to be this anti-Bush bashing Michael Moore esk propaganda attack flick blaming whitey, I’ll admit, it was none of that.
The good thing was that Lee was virtually invisible throughout the program because the pictures and the testimonials is all that was needed to tell the story.
No fancy graphics, no music, no parade of leftist pretending to give a shit about black folks. His 100 interviews of subjects exploring the tragedy of the event was honest and rivetingly.
Make no mistake, what happened was off the charts fucked up for a number of reasons.
This disaster illustrated the colossal failures of big government and more than adequately displayed why big government is almost always doomed to failure.
This is a program everyone must see, there are some powerful images, but what I came away with was just how broken black America has become.
As sad as the images were I could not help to feel angry at how black America was portrayed.
Black folks were portrayed as weak, inferior, helpless and ignorant. This was not about strong, proud resilient folks, the type of individual traits that were from generations past.
All of the struggles suffered by Black Americans through slavery, segregation and constant and consistent racism many in this documentary kept asking the question, “where was OUR government.” katrina5.jpgI’m thinking you people already thought the government was racist and corrupt, what made them think they would be coming to their rescue?
More than that, black folks from around the country watched as events unfolded, I’m thinking during this documentary, where were these peoples families, their friends, their churches.
If we are going to look at this documentary as an indictment on America we as black folks sure as hell should be looking in the mirror.
Forget the government for a moment, I concede they screwed up, I’ll even take Nigga Nagin off the hook for his utter stupidity and lack of leadership, and I’ll take idiot Governor Blanco off the hook.
But back in the day, when black folks got in trouble, black folks rallied on their own to help their own.
Lets put the spotlight on just where the aid did not come from and why NOLA still looks like shit today despite more than $100 billion in aid sent to the area.
Who are some of our wealthiest athletes and some yearly earnings, keep in mind this is a little dated: Tiger Woods $76,673,413,  Shaquille O’Neal, $40,517,858, LeBron James  $39,018,920, Kevin Garnett, $36,000,000, Kobe Bryant Basketball L.A. Lakers $25,498,000.
What about some net worth for some hip hop artists and entertainers P. Diddy $346 Million, Jay-Z $340 Million, Russell Simmons $325 Million, Dr. Dre $150 Million
Ice Cube $145 Million, 50 Cent $100 Million, Nelly $60 Million.  
What about some wealthy black Women: Sheila Crump Johnson 1.5 Billion BET; Doris Fisher $1.4 billion Gap Inc.; Marian Illitch $1.3 billion Lil Caesar’s Pizza Inc.; Oprah Winfrey $1.0 billion Harpo Productions Inc.; Meg Whitman $800 million E-Bay Inc.; Marcey Carsey $610 million Carsey-Werner Marion Sandler and $550 million Golden West Financial.

There are thousands of people not on this listing of course. Not to mention the absence of groups like the NEW Black Panthers, The Urban League, NAACP, the Christian Leadership Conference, the members of the Congressional Black Caucus, all of the black newspapers, Magazines, media stars and headliners.  

My point is all of the people that want to point the finger at whitey for screwing those poor black folks stood around and let them do it. Well to do black folks could have come together and helped the situation before and after.
Some rich nigga could have sent a plane down there to get those people out. Shit they have no problem flying their entourages around on gambling, shopping and hoe fest parties.
You mean not one rich nigga who either lived, was from, or had ties to NOLA could not shell out some dollars to provide vehicles and busses to get those people out.
All of these black churches around the nation nobody was willing to step up to the plate and say “what do you need mayor”. Remember THEY HAD MORE THAN A WEEK TO PREPARE!    
If any of you, watched the events of Katrina unfold and stared at the pictures and sat on your ass and kept yelling at the TV saying “where is the government”, well you obviously wanted someone else to take responsibility for those poor souls.
Liberal Democrats following the disaster cried racism, but nobody has been down there to see the progress or lack thereof since.
katrina6.jpgHow come Hilliary, Kennedy, Jessie, Sharpton, Dean or any other Democrat have not been making regular trips to right the wrongs of the evil racist Republicans.
Former Presidents Bush 41 and Clinton did not immediately have some crusade for the victims, but then why should they, those are white guys, why would they give a fuck about some poor ignorant black folks.
But even more than that, the one dude who was interviewed who had to leave the body of his dead mother behind, where the fuck was his family?
If my mother lived in NOLA and I had MORE THAN A WEEKS NOTICE that a hurricane was coming, I’m down there getting my family and friends the fuck out of there.
When hurricane Ivan was coming towards Alabama, my brother flew from California and I drove from Kansas, secured the house, gathered their important papers, box some other items of importance, got my mother and grandmother to a shelter, the local church was prepared with a weeks worth of food and supplies, while my brother and I took watch at the house.
Where were the churches, any damm denomination, to come to the aid of those people?
Those people were not just let down by the government and whitey, they were fucked by a selfish society and selfish negros, and when your guilt got to you, folks started pointing fingers at the easiest scapegoat, the president and the government.
The other weakness of the documentary was not explaining that there was an evacuation plan, that hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars were sent to Louisiana over the years and those levees looked like they were constructed by some third world nation.
What the fuck did Louisiana do with OUR money?
All of the elected officials who have served in NOLA and the state of Louisiana katrina7.jpgover the past 35-40 years, (many of them black, including the crook congressman William “ice box” Jefferson knew of the pending doom and knew that the federal monies dedicated to the wetlands and the levee systems were being diverted to other uses, that is the tragedy. Niggas and rednecks were both complicit in the deception and corruption.
So while you might shed tears at the horrors depicted in Spike’s documentary, remember every damm body failed those people. And in true American style some people (black and white) will profit on the suffering of others.
Spike says someone should go to jail, shit, we don’t have enough jail space for all the folks who are guilty of wrongdoing. The politicians, the media, the families, city, county, state and federal governments, but neglectful families, friends, churches and the niggas with the dollars that could have come to the aid of those people.
But in today’s world it’s every nigga for themselves, just blame whitey. “I’ve gots to get my hair did.”  Niggas on rooftops can wait.

Sphere: Related Content

Black candidates paint new picture for GOP politics

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

African-American voters in Ohio, Pa. and Md. being asked to rethink Democratic allegiances
By Jill Lawrence
USA TODAY

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — Two years after the 2004 presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell still faces accusations that Bvote.jpghe made it hard for Democrats to vote. Here at a public housing community center, however, black ministers — many of them Democrats — are showering him with applause, laughter and amens.
The Republican candidate for governor, an imposing 6-foot-4 in this small, packed room, is sharing his experiences as a black person in America. His father was a meatpacker, he says. He grew up in public housing, selling peanuts and helping at a funeral home. He worked in the civil rights movement, and he challenged the lending practices of white bankers in Cincinnati.
He did not, he says, try to suppress minority turnout in 2004. (“Do you think Mrs. Blackwell raised a dumb child? Why would I suppress the black vote when I understood how well I do in the African-American community?”) In fact, he says, a record number of blacks voted in Ohio in 2004.
When he’s done, several Democratic pastors say they might vote for Blackwell for governor this fall over Democratic U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland. Henry McNeil, pastor of Alpha & Omega First Baptist Church, says Blackwell closed the sale. “I didn’t come with a made-up mind. It was made while he spoke,” says McNeil, who backed Democrat John Kerry for president in 2004.
Voters like these are making Democrats edgy this year. In Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland, some African-Americans are rethinking their party loyalties in light of black Republicans running for high office.

Black support for Republicans is normally so low that the GOP declared victory when President Bush won 16% of the black vote in Ohio in 2004 (5 percentage points above his national share). Now, three black Republican contenders could scramble the usual patterns:

•Michael Steele, 47, Maryland’s lieutenant governor and a former international investment lawyer, is running for an open U.S. Senate seat in a heavily Democratic state.

•Lynn Swann, 52, a broadcaster and member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, is trying to oust Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell.

•Blackwell, 58, a former Cincinnati mayor, diplomat, Cabinet undersecretary, state treasurer and two-time Ohio secretary of State, is up against Strickland.

Blackwell points out that of the three, only he has repeatedly won statewide office on his own. He does acknowledge a certain kinship, though: “We’re all in this historical moment, in a position to have breakthrough candidacies.”
That’s not to say they are shoo-ins. Swann in particular has a tough climb; recent polls show him 10 to 20 points behind Rendell. Even so, “I don’t want people thinking I’m only doing this to make the Republican Party look like it’s diverse,” he says. “My intent is to win.”
Blackwell is contending with a difficult climate for Republicans in Ohio, where GOP Gov. Bob Taft was convicted of four violations of state ethics laws, and the biggest public corruption probe in state history has ensnared other prominent GOP figures.
Though their candidates are leading in all three states, Democrats are stepping up outreach efforts and showcasing black candidates elsewhere on the ballot — among them nominees for state auditor and state Supreme Court in Ohio and a lieutenant governor hopeful in Maryland.
Political observers view the three GOP campaigns — win or lose — as a watershed. Republican outreach to minorities, a priority for national party Chairman Ken Mehlman, “has gone a good bit beyond just tokenism,” says John Green, director of the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron.
Green says black candidates perceive opportunity in the GOP, and the party sees them as potential winners. Parts of the growing black middle class “find the Republican Party congenial,” he says, as do black voters who have conservative religious or moral views.
Blackwell opposes abortion and gay marriage, says he wants to cut taxes and government spending, talks up the power of the free market to help the black community, and vows to defeat the “social, cultural and political forces that have tried to run God and faith and religion out of the public square.”
A University of Cincinnati poll on May 25 had Blackwell 6 points behind Strickland and pulling one-third of the black vote. The poll’s margin of error was +/-4 percentage points.
Steele faces token opposition in Maryland’s primary Sept. 12. Polls show Rep. Ben Cardin is ahead in the Democratic nomination race and does best against Steele. But Kweisi Mfume, a black former congressman and NAACP head, is also running. An Mfume loss could alienate black Democrats.
If that happens, “it’s going to be very dicey because blacks are going to have to choose between a white candidate and Steele,” says Ron Walters, director of the University of Maryland’s African American Leadership Institute. Blacks make up about a quarter of the electorate in Maryland.
A March poll for Maryland Democrats found that 22% of black voters supported “Republican Michael Steele” against “a Democrat,” and a majority of black voters were “open” to backing Steele.
Steele’s goal is 20%-25% of the black vote, and he’s going after it aggressively. He was a guest on a syndicated radio show hosted by former Democratic presidential candidate Al Sharpton. He even showed up at a fundraiser for a black Democratic congressman, his “good friend” Albert Wynn, to prospect for votes. “I turned a few heads,” Steele says, laughing.
A former state GOP chairman, Steele says he has been trying for years to ease “strained” relations between Republicans and African-Americans. “Sometimes you run into a great deal of resistance,” he says, but blacks are beginning to respond to the party’s focus on opportunity and ownership because “they are looking for those things.”
In Pennsylvania, Swann says of black voters that “you can’t win them if you don’t start talking to them.” Even so, he is running the most traditional GOP campaign of the three so far. “He is more likely to be seen at a chamber of commerce than an urban African-American church,” says political scientist Christopher Borick, director of Pennsylvania’s Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.
Terry Madonna, director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pa., says Swann’s rise from humble beginnings and opposition to abortion and gay marriage could appeal to black voters.
“Many of us are surprised that he’s not put on a full-court press,” Madonna says.
Swann spokesman Lenny Alcivar says that full-court press is “about to happen” after a period of intensive fundraising. He says Swann recently hired a deputy campaign manager for outreach and plans to “hit very hard” on black radio, visit black communities and speakmore about education and crime.
Here at the community center in Ohio, Blackwell is putting his own full-court press on three dozen black ministers. He speaks of new jobs, the promise of ethanol, the importance of two-parent families, homeownership and black-owned businesses. He appeals to them as leaders — “you have not been sideline sitters” — who deserve two parties competing for their votes.
“I have never, ever asked someone to vote for me just because of the color of my skin,” Blackwell says. “This is about performance. This is about who can best respond to your interests.”
Democratic candidate Strickland says Blackwell is not that person. “Ken Blackwell was purposefully involved in efforts to suppress the vote” in 2004, he says, and should let someone else supervise this fall’s election. He also says Blackwell’s support for mandated restrictions on state spending would cripple investment in areas such as education.
“I have great confidence,” Strickland says, that when African-Americans weigh his agenda against Blackwell’s ideas, “they’re going to do as they most often do, and that’s vote for the Democrat.”
In this room, some Democrats aren’t so sure. Tarone Claybrook, pastor of Heartreach Ministries, says he votes “about 70% Democratic,” but Blackwell is “the top possibility for me. I like his passion. I like his direction.” Carolyn O’Neil, associate minister of Tabernacle Baptist Church, says she’s impressed by Blackwell and his ideas about “how to get the black community into the economic race.”
Some of the Democrats may vote for Strickland in the end, but Blackwell has achieved his preliminary goal of getting them to think about their choices. “I’m still undecided,” says Democrat Robin Woodberry, youth pastor at New Bethel Baptist Church. “I will be in prayer.”

Sphere: Related Content

A Real Culture of Corruption

Tuesday, June 13th, 2006

67.jpg

What a moment for the Congressional Black Caucus to make a stand.

By Rich Lowry - National Review

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been outed. After a long and honorable career in public service, the truth has been revealed. She is motivated by racial animus.

That’s the conclusion we’re supposed to draw from her request that a Democratic congressman caught on videotape accepting $100,000 in bribes from an FBI informant should give up a plum committee assignment. The congressman in question is the infamous Rep. William Jefferson, the Louisiana Democrat who was discovered by the FBI to be keeping $90,000 in hard cash in his freezer along with his ice cream and TV dinners.

Ordinarily it would be unremarkable that a congressman stinking of bribery would earn such a rebuke. But Jefferson is black. So his allies naturally turn to the race card to defend him, even if it means playing it against Pelosi, about whom many critical things can be said — but not that she’s a racist.

Jefferson has said that her request is “discriminatory.” Many members of the Congressional Black Caucus — always a sucker for self-defeating race-based appeals — are backing Jefferson. A CBC aide summarized the sentiment thusly: “Congresswoman Pelosi, by pre-emption without any legal justification, has now created a new precedent for how members are going to be treated. Unfortunately, she’s chosen to single out an African-American for this honor.”

The suggestion is that, if only a white Democrat had been secreting tens of thousands of dollars in cash in his house, Pelosi would be looking the other way. What a disgusting slur. While it is true that usually members have to be indicted to be removed from committees, if common sense ever dictated an exception, this is it. Nonetheless, black-caucus members are murmuring that their voters are tired of being taken for granted by the Democrats, in a spectacularly bizarre ordering of priorities.

Rotten public schools are cheating black kids out of an education, but Democrats don’t want to do anything fundamental to fix them. The breakdown of the two-parent family is the gravest crisis facing urban black communities, but Democrats barely speak of it. The Democrats are pushing a liberal agenda on gay marriage and other cultural issues that runs counter to most blacks’ social conservatism. All of that, the CBC is happy to swallow. But discipline one of its members for a gross ethical lapse, and they aren’t going to take it anymore.

This puts the supposed GOP-fostered “culture of corruption” in Congress — a favorite Democratic campaign theme — in a different light. One place where you find literally a culture of corruption, in the sense of a deeply ingrained pattern of corrupt practices, is in black urban politics. That is so partly because it is tolerated. There apparently has never been a black politician in America accused of corruption who isn’t the victim of racism, according to civil-rights groups and other black politicians.

This is a profoundly enabling attitude, and the people hurt by it are generally poor blacks, who suffer from the resulting degraded governance. Jefferson says he won’t step aside because New Orleans, which he represents, needs him at this time of rebuilding. As if the residents of the Ninth Ward can be ably served only by a congressman venal enough to traffic in tens of thousands of dollars in cash and stupid enough to get caught.

Given the awful history involved, it is understandable that black politics sometimes is characterized by a prickly pride and an easily roused defensiveness. But those feelings should be properly channeled into a swift and angry rejection of unethical black politicians like Jefferson, as unworthy of the struggles that made black representation in Congress possible and of the black constituents who so need and deserve good leadership.

It is telling that Tom DeLay, the supposed poster boy for Republican corruption, is out of Congress without having ever gotten near a bundle of cash. Maybe the GOP caucus has higher standards, or maybe it just doesn’t like white people.
 

 

 

Sphere: Related Content

Jimmy Carter: Recovering Racist, Still a Bigot

Thursday, June 1st, 2006

 carter2.jpg

A TASTE OF THE ARTICLE:

Carter won the governorship of Georgia in 1970 via a race-baiting campaign. In his 2004 book The Real Jimmy Carter, Steven Hayward writes that Carter’s campaign staff sent an anonymous mailer “to barbershops, country churches, and rural law enforcement officers containing a grainy photo of [his Democratic opponent Carl] Sanders, part owner of the Atlanta Hawks NBA franchise, at an after-game locker room victory celebration. Two black players were pouring champagne over Sanders’s head. The Atlanta Constitution noted, ‘In the context of the sports pages, it was a routine shot … But in the context of this political campaign it was a dangerous smear that injected both race, alcohol, and high living into the campaign.’ Carter’s senior campaign aides Bill Pope, Hamilton Jordan, and Jerry Rafshoon were behind the mailing; Pope was even spotted passing out the flyers at a Ku Klux Klan rally … The Carter campaign also produced a leaflet noting that Sanders had paid tribute to Martin Luther King, Jr.
“… Carter also implied that he met privately with the head of the States Rights Council, a white supremacist group, and campaigned in all-white private schools that were known as ’segregation academies,’ where he promised that he would do ‘everything’ to support their existence. ‘I have no trouble pitching for [George] Wallace [segregationist] votes and the black votes at the same time,’ Carter told a reporter. Carter also said to another reporter, ‘I can win this election without a single black vote.’”

READ ENTIRE ARTICLE: From: Jewish World Review

Jimmy Carter A Racist? NO, REALLY NO WAY, WAY…..
Jimmy Carter courted segregationist groups when running as a candidate for governor of Georgia in 1966:

“He attributed this loss to a lack of support from segregationist whites, who had turned out in large numbers to vote for his opponent, a nationally known segregationist named Lester Maddox. In a bid to win their vote in the 1970 governor’s race, Carter minimized appearances before African American groups, and even sought the endorsements of avowed segregationists…”

“He wanted to appeal to the large middle class, blue collar type, predominantly white, and most of these people are going to be segregationists,” says historian E. Stanly Godbold. “Carter himself was not a segregationist in 1970. But he did say things that the segregationists wanted to hear.”

After winning the election, he declared the era of segregation over.

Oh really? 

 

Sphere: Related Content

Power corrupts both parties

Monday, May 29th, 2006

 
A rare bipartisan unity was achieved in the House of Representatives this week.
What was it that brought lawmakers together? A determination to win the war on terror? A plan to secure our borders? A compromise to save Social Security from bankruptcy?
Nah. Democratic and Republican leaders in the House joined together to protest the search the FBI made last weekend of the offices of Rep. William Jefferson (D., La.), who is under investigation for allegedly accepting a bribe from a Kentucky businessman.
Partisan differences are set aside when (and apparently only when) the privileges of lawmakers are threatened.
One would imagine, that in the wake of the Duke Cunningham and Jack Abramoff scandals, the GOP would be grateful for the attention devoted to Mr. Jefferson, because his case, and that of Rep. Alan Mollohan (D., W.Va.), make Democratic denunciations of the “Republican culture of corruption ” seem a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
But one would be wrong.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Good example of why Liberals irritate the hell out of me!

Sunday, May 28th, 2006

 Sniff Note:
I’m sure this post will be linked to all over blogland. This entry from the KOS is more tired chicken-hawk blogsterbation liberal rants.
You see folks this is not rocket science. Liberals hate the military and hate everything the military stands for. So when some 20-something punk ass fucken whiteboy dorm rat gets on blogs like the KOS and rails about those mean old white men and women who rail against liberalism somehow the fact that they either did or did not serve in the military has some sort of a credibility attached to it.
Having served in the military, I can testify that it certainly does not make you smarter, better and more loving of this nation and better able to make decisions for this nation than those who have not served.
We are now having serious conversations about the possibility of a woman serving as commander in chief. Many of these women will not have served in the military but that does not make them any less qualified.
To those liberals who will no doubt read this tired drivel and have an orgasm after reading it, just appreciate the hypocrisy of your glee.
What you do with your position in office once you have been given the privilege to serve there is what matters.
Our country has a voluntary military. The people there have not be threatened or bribed to join.
The men who died for this country made the ultimate sacrifice for this nation. But you know what, all through human history the various leaders always stood at the top and watched as those were sacrificed on the behalf of the kingdom or country.        

If you don’t like the direction of this nation, then opt to be a fucken leader or elect another one.
Simple premise to me.
All of the people this stupid jackass listed as not having served in the military is suppose to tell me what, that they have no opinion, they have no say, they can’t support a given cause or position. Because they are conservatives, Republicans or whatever that not having served in the military is license to silence them or even ME! Fuck that. Get your own damm talk radio show, or TV program, or run for office.
You liberals and this chicken-hawk bullshit is just over the top fucken retarded.
Liberal never cease to amaze me how they will malign the military and call them murderers when it is politically expedient, and on Memorial Day, while they get drunk out of their asses and watch a ball game or get on a blog and make political hay regurgitating the familiar virtues (or lack thereof) of evil Neocon and chicken-hawks everywhere.

Damm idiot pricks.
Hey you stupid liberal punk ass just what the fuck qualifies you to be the literary sounding board chastising us evil Neocons? Nothing, not a fucken thing. Other than thanks to those who died to give you the right and freedom to sit in your underwear, chug a Milwaukees’ Best and blogsterbate your colossal ignorance to the masses on KOS’s moronic world.
If the only standard is a keyboard or a microphone then Rush, Hannity and Coulter are equally as qualified you. Stupid idiot maggot!
BTW Have a nice Memorial Day.  From a Chicken-hawk, oh snap I wuz in the Air Force, does that count!? 

 

————————-

Requiem for a Nightmare by DarkSyde on KOS
Sun May 28, 2006 at 06:06:06 AM PDT
Tomorrow is the day we honor the fallen American heroes of so many wars. To avoid staining our national day of mourning, I felt it more appropriate to dedicate this post at this time to a very different kind of American. They may be clueless neocons, erroneous White House talking heads, or smear artists and their self-appointed town criers. But what they all have in common is that each one bravely ducked when called and later took part directly or indirectly in assaulting the reputation of those who stood in harm’s way. They are known, affectionately, as Chicken-hawks:
President George W. Bush - served four years of a six years Nat’l Guard commitment, some say after daddy’s friends pulled some strings to keep him out of Vietnam. The circumstances of his early separation from state-side service are still controversial (details)
Karl Rove, occasional Deputy Chief of Staff and alleged full time smear artist, escaped the draft and did not serve
VP Dick Cheney - several deferments, by marriage and timely fatherhood
Former VP Chief of Staff I. Lewis Scooter Libby - did not serve
Secretary of State and former NSA Condaleeza Rice - did not serve
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - did not serve.
Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert - did not serve.
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay - did not serve
House Majority Whip Roy Blunt - did not serve
Majority Whip Mitch McConnell - did not serve
Rick Santorum, third ranking Republican in the Senate - did not serve.
Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott - did not

—————

FEEL FREE TO READ MORE OF THIS BULLSHIT HERE 

Sphere: Related Content

Dobbs: Bush, Congress tell working folk to go to hell

Friday, May 26th, 2006

 

By Lou Dobbs

CNN NEW YORK (CNN) — President Bush says that the installation of the new Iraqi government was a “watershed event,” but at the same time warns Americans of the challenges and loss as we continue to prosecute the war against Iraqi insurgents. Sen. Harry Reid declares that legislation that would render English the national language is racist.

Thirty-seven Democrats vote for full amnesty for all illegal aliens in this country, even though nobody really knows whether the number is 11 million, 12 million or 20 million. The Senate Republican leadership demands that a “comprehensive immigration reform” plan must be passed before this Memorial Day weekend. And the president signs into law a tax cut that raises taxes on the educational funds of teenagers saving for college.

Never before in our country’s history have both the president and Congress been so out of touch with most Americans. Never before have so few of our elected officials and corporate leaders been less willing to commit to the national interest. And never before has our nation’s largest constituent group — some 200 million middle-class Americans — been without representation in our nation’s capital.

George W. Bush’s approval ratings have slumped to the lowest of his presidency. The approval rating for Congress is even lower, and nearly three-quarters of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction.
But what is our government doing about that? The president is staying the course in Iraq and apparently demanding little of his generals to create a new, far more effective strategy for urgent success. Of course, he also wants a guest-worker program and amnesty of millions of illegal aliens. And Congress, faced with midterm elections in just over five months, is intent on giving the president what he wants and telling working men and women and their families, American citizens all, to go to hell.

Illegal aliens are more important to this Congress than securing our borders and our ports, more important than those legal immigrants who have waited in line and who follow the law. The Senate has added to the litany of lunacy that makes up what it calls reform: Illegal aliens would only have to pay back taxes on three of the past five years, they will not be prosecuted for felonies such as identity theft or purchasing or using fraudulent Social Security cards, and unlike millions of visa holders who have to leave the country to have them renewed, they may simply remain in the United States while this Congress and this president give away all the benefits and privileges of American citizenship.

This is an outright assault in the elitist war on the middle class. And working men and women who’ve already borne the pain of losing good-paying manufacturing jobs and having middle-class jobs outsourced to cheap foreign labor markets are faced with the onslaught of more illegal immigration and cheap labor into the American economy. This president and Congress talk about bringing illegal aliens out of the shadows while they turn out the lights on our middle class.
President Bush and his most trusted advisers tell us how well our economy is doing, how many jobs have been created and how so-called free trade will enrich the lives of the same people whose livelihoods these policies are destroying.

It’s hard not to think of the trusted adviser to Catherine the Great who sought to hide from her the embarrassing and shoddy condition of Ukrainian and Crimean villages by having elaborate facades built to divert her attention and to mask an uncomfortable reality. I don’t know whether Karl Rove is President Bush’s Grigori Potemkin or whether George Bush has created Potemkin villages all by himself. But the facades are cracking, and phony fronts of failed policies are quickly crumbling.

Six thousand unarmed National Guardsmen working as adjunct rear support to our undermanned, under-equipped Border Patrol is not border security. Three million illegal aliens continue to cross our borders and depress wages by hundreds of billions of dollars every year. The millions of manufacturing and middle-class jobs lost over the last five years have been replaced by lower-wage employment.

The president’s faith-based commitment to so-called free trade will likely lead to a $1 trillion U.S. current account deficit this year and a trade debt of $4.5 trillion after 30 years of trade deficits. And while the president and Congress point to No Child Left Behind as a solution to our educational crisis, we’re failing an entire generation of Americans whose test scores continue to fall and whose high school dropout rates would be embarrassing to a third-world country.
And a third-world country is what we will be if our elected officials don’t soon come to their senses.

Sphere: Related Content

Rep. William Jefferson - DEMOCRAT Louisiana

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

 

Filing: Tape Shows Lawmaker Taking Money

By MATTHEW BARAKATAssociated Press Writer
ALEXANDRIA, Va.

A congressman under investigation for bribery was caught on videotape accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from an FBI informant whose conversations with the lawmaker also were recorded, according to a court document released Sunday. Agents later found the cash hidden in his freezer.
At one audiotaped meeting, Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., chuckles about writing in code to keep secret what the government contends was his corrupt role in getting his children a cut of a communications company’s deal for work in Africa. >As Jefferson and the informant passed notes about what percentage the lawmaker’s family might receive, the congressman “began laughing and said, ‘All these damn notes we’re writing to each other as if we’re talking, as if the FBI is watching,’” according to the affidavit.
Jefferson, who represents New Orleans, has not been charged and denies any wrongdoing.
As for the $100,000, the government says Jefferson got the money in a leather briefcase last July 30 at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Arlington. The plan was for the lawmaker to use the cash to bribe a high-ranking Nigerian official _ the name is blacked out in the court document _ to ensure the success of a business deal in that country, the affidavit said.
All but $10,000 was recovered on Aug. 3 when the FBI searched Jefferson’s home in Washington. The money was stuffed in his freezer, wrapped in $10,000 packs and concealed in food containers and aluminum foil.
Two of Jefferson’s associates have pleaded guilty to bribery-related charges in federal court in Alexandria. One, businessman Vernon Jackson of Louisville, Ky., admitted paying more than $400,000 in bribes to the lawmaker in exchange for his help securing business deals for Jackson’s telecommunications company in Nigeria and other African countries.
The new details about the case emerged after federal agents searched Jefferson’s congressional office on Capitol Hill Saturday night and Sunday. The nearly 100-page affidavit for a search warrant, made public Sunday with large portions blacked out, spells out much of the evidence so far.
The document includes excerpts of conversations between Jefferson and an unidentified business executive from northern Virginia. She agreed to wear a wire after she approached the FBI with complaints that Jefferson and an associate had ripped her off in a business deal.
Jefferson’s lawyer, Robert Trout, contended that the prosecutors’ disclosure was “part of a public relations agenda and an attempt to embarrass Congressman Jefferson. The affidavit itself is just one side of the story which has not been tested in court,” Trout said in a statement.
The affidavit says Jefferson is caught on videotape at the Ritz- Carlton as he takes a reddish-brown briefcase from the trunk of the informant’s car, slips it into a cloth bag, puts the bag into his 1990 Lincoln Town Car and drives away.
The $100 bills in the suitcase had the same serial numbers as those found in Jefferson’s freezer.
While the name of the intended recipient of the $100,000 is blacked out, other details in the affidavit indicate he is Abubakar Atiku, Nigeria’s vice president. He owns a home in Potomac, Md., that authorities have searched as part of the Jefferson investigation.
Jefferson assured the FBI informant in their coded conversations that he paid the money to the Nigerian official, even though the money was still in Jefferson’s possession when agents searched his home Aug. 3.
On Aug. 1, two days after Jefferson picked up the $100,000, the informant called Jefferson to ask about the status of “the package.”
Jefferson responded: “I gave him the African art that you gave me and he was very pleased.”
When Jefferson and the informant had dinner at a Washington restaurant on May 12, 2005, the FBI was listening, too. Jefferson indicates he will need an increased stake in the profits of one deal, the affidavit said. Instead of the 7 percent stake originally agreed upon, he writes “18-20″ on a piece of paper and passes it to the informant.
That is when negotiations move ahead and notes go back and forth, ending with Jefferson’s laughter about the FBI watching it all.
Throughout the conversations, Jefferson makes attempts to deflect direct connections to any bribes.
He tells the informant at one point that money should be paid to businesses operated by his children. “I make a deal for my children. It wouldn’t be me,” Jefferson said, according to the affidavit.
In a different conversation, Jefferson seeks to distance himself from bribes that must be paid to Nigerian government officials to facilitate transactions.
“If he’s gotta pay Minister X, we don’t want to know. It’s not our deal,” Jefferson told the witness, according to the affidavit. “We’re not paying Minister X a damn thing. That’s all, you know, international fraud crap. We’re not doing that. We’re not doing any of that that gets us (unintelligible).”
The affidavit also spells out “seven other schemes” in which Jefferson was involved; nearly all were blacked out in the document.
The Jefferson investigation has provided fodder for Republicans who have suffered black eyes in the investigations of current and former GOP lawmakers, including Tom DeLay and Randy “Duke” Cunningham.
Jefferson, who has pledged not to resign from Congress in the face of the bribery investigation, speculated about his political future in one of the recorded conversations.
When the informant asked Jefferson about his political plans, he responded: “I’m gonna get your deal out of the way … and I probably won’t last long after that.” 

Sphere: Related Content

2006 will be a major disappointment. So will 2008.

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

POST VIA THE NEWS BLOG AND THE DAILY KOS

LIBERALS ARE GETTING A BIT CRANKY. MY MAN WAR WILL HAVE TO ADDRESS THIS POST! 

 Color me pessimistic. Call me a chicken little. Tell me I’m a naysayer. Say I’m a buzzkill. But do hear me out.
We’re going to be in trouble: Markos can sense it. I can sense it. Joe Klein can sense it (but for all the wrong reasons). Nearly every prominent Democrat is extremely wary right now that, while the polls may look good now, we will be horribly disappointed come this November.We’re going to be in trouble because–to this day–WE REFUSE TO TAKE A STAND. We’re fighting back alright–finally–but we’re not taking a stand.
And what do I mean by taking a stand? I’ll tell you…
Even here on the blogosphere, we do not take a stand. Not really. Not most of the time.
Oh, yes, don’t get me wrong: we scream about the evils of Iraq War until our lungs give out; we decry the Imperial Presidency and the shredding of our beloved Constitution; we lambaste the incompetence born of heartless indifference that created the Katrina disaster; we vent over the mind-numbing corruption and salacious scandals; we fume at the depradations of the Christianist right; and we weep at the evils done in the name of America–in our name.
But that’s NOT called taking a stand. It’s called fighting back. It’s what a schoolkid does when he’s finally had enough of the neighborhood bully–and it’s good when it happens–but it’s not remotely enough to win over the country. And if we don’t do what it takes to really win over the country, we’re going to lose. Again. We won’t lose to Bush, but we’ll still lose.—————————————————-
We’re going to lose because PERSONAL TAINT IS EPHEMERAL in politics. Basic corruption and incompetence are bad, but not insurmountable. And personal dislike of a single, or even multiple politicians, may spell doom for them personally–but not for the ideology that put them there in the first place. Attempting to ride personal taint and corruption to victory at the ballot box is stupid, myopic and shortsighted–even if it works in the short-term.
For all the brouhaha and cheering celebrations here in the liberal blogosphere about Bush’s eternally sinking poll numbers, we seem to have forgotten something of extraordinary importance: Bush once had approval ratings of over 50%–even before 9/11. And the public voted overwhelmingly for Republican congressmen and congresswomen in 1994, 1996, 2000, 2002 and 2004. And that is important–it is a lesson forgotten at our peril.
For a lesson in contrast, one has only to look to Bill Clinton. Despite his personal foibles, Bill Clinton was and remained an extremely popular president–personally. But that personal admiration on the part of voters did not translate to an admiration of Democratic politics, and we lost seats. In the same way, voters can hate and reject Bush personally–and even many congressional Republicans–but they will not reject REPUBLICANISM.
———————————–
And what IS Republicanism? Any average voter can tell you: smaller government, stronger military, and “moral values.”
The fact that Republicans have failed entirely to shrink the government; the fact that they have wrecked our military; the fact that they have failed to foster anything but amorality; these things are irrelevant. The only thing that IS relevant is that the GOP machine has sold the idea of Republicanism to the average voter.
And the corollary of that premise is that, if a Republican fails to deliver on the promises of Republicanism, it can only be for one reason: he/she wasn’t Republican enough.
Or, to put it another way: When you look at Bush’s 32% approval rating, have you ever asked yourself how many of those people hate him because he’s not far enough to the right? I know I have–and the answer scares me.
Right now, the public is disgusted with their elected leaders. But as campaign season rolls around again, the sheeple will be inclined to forigve the actual practitioners of the greed and corruption, so long as they stay on message: the message of Republicanism. The message of smaller government, stronger military, and “moral values.”
And all the screaming in the world won’t change that.———————————————-
And what–pray tell–do WE stand for? What reason on earth does the public have to vote for a Democrat?
If you asked Joe Sixpack on the street how he thinks his life would change if Democrats controlled the House and Senate, do you think he would have a coherent answer?
If you asked Joe Sixpack on the street what the Democrats’ equivalent of Republicanism is, do you think he would have a coherent answer?
I certainly don’t see an answer. But I know what I DO see.
I see one wing of the party kowtowing to Republicans and playing at being Republican-lite: the DLC, Harman, Joe Lieberman wing.
And I see the other wing screaming bloody murder at the various depradations of this administration and its cronies–by sending message bills, threatening impeachment, and demanding investigations: this is the Conyers/Boxer wing. And of the two, this is FAR preferable.
But I see NO ONE actually taking a stand. I see NO ONE standing up for DEMOCRATISM.———————————–
And what would that even look like? I can tell what I think it would look like.
For starters, it would mean shaping our policies around Liberal Rhetoric again. In my diary A Memorial For What We Have Lost, I tried to remind people of the REAL values that American stands for–that are ingraved and tattooed onto its very being:
The Common Good.Equal Opportunity.The Right to Privacy.Accountable Government.Respect Abroad.
It would mean standing up for single-payer healthcare.
It would mean standing up for a SERIOUS increase in the minimum wage.
It would mean standing up for SERIOUSLY higher taxes on corporations and the extremely wealthy, in order to actually SHRINK the income gap in this country.
It would mean standing up for re-regulating all the corrupt, vampirous industries that were deregulated by Reagan and Bush.
It would mean standing up strongly for the separation of church and state, and heaping scorn on those who would tear it down, rather than running in fear of them.
It would mean standing up for SERIOUSLY higher pensions and funding for our military personnel, and for our veterans.
It would mean doing all these things and much more–AND MAKING SURE THAT JOE SIXPACK KNEW WE MEANT IT.
———————————————–
We can talk impeachments until we’re blue in the face. We can call for investigations until our hearts give out. And we can seek indictments unto our political graves. And these are things we MUST DO.
But until we actually make a stand–until we stand up for Democratism–we will ALWAYS be playing second fiddle to Republicans–even if they do end up hanging themselves with their own rope here and there.
Because, when push comes to shove, the disgusted voters may throw out individual Republicans from time to time–but they will eternally vote for Republicanism. Until and unless, that is, they are given a serious alternative. An alternative that grasps their imaginations and the better angels of their natures, rather than simply tapping into their frustration and disgust.
It’s time to do more than just fight back, folks. It’s time to take a stand–because I’m tired of losing.
And it would mean pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. Why? Because this isn’t a debate over issues, I wish it was, but it’s not.You pick a fight on these issues, Bush will change the subject and win, because he’s already defined the terms on which they will be fought.Raise those issues and the GOP has a rallying point. They’re attacking churches, they want socialized medicine. Nope, sorry, not this time. Trying to redefine issues in an election year is bad politics, when the issue is the other side’s utter incompetence.Kerry lost because Rove had gay marriage in his pocket. He could drop his code words, throw Kerry off and appeal to the base and they stormed into the polls to protect marriage and vote for Bush. Why hand them another issue at this point?You can’t win any of those fights until you hold office. But if you raise them, the GOP and friends will hand you your head and laugh.The place you stand is on ground you define, Bush’s failure, and Democratic competence. Bush has failed, and that is a powerful meme to frame an argument in. But you can’t roll back anything until you control Congress and saying you will changes the subject.I don’t worry about how many people think Bush isn’t conservative enough, those people aren’t going to change much, I worry about the Independents who must be convinced that this isn’t working any longer. Dems first have to stand for fighting back and resisting Bush, because that is what is on the table.It’s the people who could support Bush because they thought he agreed with them on any number of issues, who think they’re moderates, are the people who make the difference. The people who wanted to believe him after 9/11 and have been disappointed.People largely support the Dems on social issues and that hasn’t changed. What they don’t trust is Democratic weakness and appeasement. You hand the GOP a battleground on their issues, they win and if you frame it as single payer and reregulation, that’s their wet dream.Instead, you frame it as weakness, betrayal of common principles and failure. Americanshate failure, more than anything else. They cannot tolerate it.It sounds great to stand on real issues, but this time, I want them to defend failure and corruption, make them define where they stand.After they lose, then you fight about what the values are. But you have to win first.

Sphere: Related Content

Black-Republican Is Not An Oxymoron

Thursday, May 11th, 2006

In what the Washington Post calls ‘The Year of the Black Republican’, they minimally capture the story by limiting it to this year.  Not taking anything away from the three Black men in the story who are on statewide ballots and, all great candidates, but Blacks in the Republican party are not as much an anomaly as they would like to portray, especially in leadership positions .   

    • J. Kenneth Blackwell, Kenneth BlackwellOhio’s secretary of state, won the nomination challenge Democrat Rep. Ted Strickland in November for Governor of Ohio.

 

 

    • In Maryland, Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele Michael Steeleis the party’s nominee to fill the seat of retiring Democratic Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes.

 

 

    • In Pennsylvania, Lynn Swann, Lynn Swannof  Pittsburgh Steelers fame, is challenging Democratic Gov. Edward G. Rendell for that state’s top spot.

 

 

Without even looking as far as the current Republican administration, it should be obvious that Republicans focus more on the content of the character than skin color.  Instead, Democrats  focus on color as political capital, something to both pander and exploit.  What is puzzling to me is why they haven’t noticed a   paucity of blacks’, to borrow a phrase, in leadership positions in their own party? 

ENTRY FROM THE BLOG “THE LUNCH COUNTER”

Sphere: Related Content