politicalpartypoop.com

DENVER — Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) told convention-goers Monday that Barack Obama is like baseball pioneer Jackie Robinson — enduring jeers without the ability to hit back.

“Barack Obama has the capacity to hit,” Jackson said a breakfast panel just before the opening of the Democratic National Convention. “But he is in the situation where he can’t hit back, which Jackie Robinson could not do. … He had to be able to run the bases, even though the crowd was jeering the first African-American on the field.”

Jackson, son of the civil rights leader, said Obama is in the same situation: “He has to keep smiling, because no one wants an angry African-American man in the White House.”

READ THE REST OF YOU CARE

Folks I started to go off on this but I just said to myself Snoop calm down and chill out.
This is just so insulting and stupid I’m actually at a loss for words. Another example of why I can’t stand ignorant ass Democrat Negros.

Sphere: Related Content

“What you saw in the Congress this week was the war dance of the handmaidens of the oil companies. That’s what you saw on the Republican side of the aisle. We have a planet to save. We have an economy to grow. And we can do that if we keep our — our balance in all of this and not just say, but for drilling in unprotected — in these protected areas offshore, we would have lower gas prices.”

-Nancy Pelosi

Sphere: Related Content

From the Rottweiler Empire

In response to the “speech” given by Liar McCain that apparently has Shit Sandwich Republicans in the throes of orgasm with renewed hope and fervor, we have very little to say.Other than: You really, honestly expect us to give a rancid turd when the dog who didn’t like Samuel Alito because he was “too conservative” and “wore his conservatism on his sleeve” suddenly starts barking about the kind of judges he wants to nominate as opposed to his opponents?

You really, honestly expect us to pay attention when the same guy who ripped out the First Amendment of the Constitution with his “Campaign Finance Reform”, shat on the paper and smeared the smelly, old fart, runny load in our faces talks about how he opposes “activist judges bypassing the legislative branch?”

You do? Are you fucking NUTS???

MORE HERE

Also check out: “But He Still Won’t Give Conservatives the Time of Day”

McShitSandwich decides to sprinkle a healthy dollop of diarrhea on the sandwich that he’s expecting voters to eat in November

Sphere: Related Content

This is a portion from the chronic Negro liberal Oliver Willis

“the vast majority of blacks engaged in politics are moving forward you have a miniscule few who for whatever the reason (I tend to think its for them to adopt a contrarian pose) will vote Republican. As a result, they are outliers within their own race and essentially position themselves against the tide of black history. The tried and true response of black conservatives is to look at themselves as some kind of hero or martyrs. The larger conservative movement, unable to attract a sizable percentage of black votes, trumpets these kinds of stories again and again. Like this blog post from the hard-right Human Events:

Blacks who will vote for McCain this fall are some of the most courageous people on the planet, because of the extreme social scorn they will face from their left-wing black counterparts.

It takes courage to challenge the dominant social order. It took courage for Elia Kazan to battle pro-Communist sentiment in the 1950s. It took courage for Martin Luther King to fight Jim Crow in the 1960s. It took courage for Ronald Reagan to confront institutionalized liberalism in the 1980s. Likewise, it will take courage for black Republicans like [Michael] Steele to combat “Obama-ism” in the late-2000s.

Of course, a black person supporting McCain is not courageous at all. If you want to truly compare it to the 1960s its the equivalent of seeing Bull Connor sic dogs on people and saying “Hey guys, let’s cool it on all this civil rights stuff, we may upset some people.”

READ FULL POST HERE

######

This is another in the long line of clueless Negros who will stop at nothing at dissing Negros who exhibits any measure of independent thought.
Just for the record if asshole happens to read this, I am not planning on voting for McCain because he is a closet liberal sellout Republican weasel like a great many of current idiot fuck Republicans like the moron Governor of Indiana.

I do not vote for nor have I ever voted for “an individual” as much as I vote for principles, which is the primary reason why I will not waist my time voting for McCain in November.
I see him in the same mold as idiot fuck Newt pimping climate change bullshit with that liberal hack Nancy Pelosi. Newt is one of a growing crop if RINO’s who believes in compromising with idiot fuck liberals when I believe they should be doing the opposite.

As far as his post referring to anti-Obama Negros as “martyrs” and that fellow Negro conservative “prop up policies that hurt black America” is simply embarrassingly retarded and intellectually vacant.

As I have said many times on this blog, as a black man Obama’s ascension to the presidency is not high on my priority list nor will his presidency make me more of a man or a better black man. And just as any idiot liberal, Obama’s policies will no doubt keep way too many black folks, uneducated, unmotivated and impoverished. No amount of right wing Negro conservative bashing I hear from clueless Negros hacks will make me think otherwise.
This is why black folks are so fucked now because most are damm sheep and end up raising fucked up kids like the one in the “kill Bush” video below.

Instead of these stupid Niggas writing these fucken moronic posts castigating Negros who refuses to buy into Obama’s or any other Democrat bullshit try educating me on just how the Magic Negro plans to magically stop Niggas from killing each other, snorting child support payments up their noses, taking care of their kids and dropping out of school at an alarming rate. Then the ears may perk up.

Sphere: Related Content

From Boston.com

(link) WASHINGTON - Republicans in Congress, trying to appear tightfisted with taxpayer dollars this election year, found yesterday that some in their ranks led a list of “pork” spenders in a watchdog group’s analysis of government waste.The annual survey by Citizens Against Government Waste contends that 11,610 special-interest projects were stuffed into spending bills approved by the Democratic-led Congress last year at a $17.2 billion cost to taxpayers.But according to the survey, individual Republicans pushed the most pork last year. In addition, the three House Republicans sponsoring legislation calling for a moratorium all engaged in the practice, the report said.

For months, House Republican leader John Boehner has been leading a crusade against such projects, known as earmarks, which benefit lawmakers’ districts. Boehner, of Ohio, has called for suspending pork spending and has criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, for not yet agreeing to do so.

Republicans have attacked Democratic Representative John Murtha for delivering a pile of special-interest funds to his western Pennsylvania district.

According to the report, however, two House Republicans bested Murtha: Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who recently became a senator, and Representative Bill Young of Florida. The two scored $176.3 million and $169.5 million in earmarks respectively, beating Murtha’s $159.1 million.

In the Senate, the top three big spenders were Republicans, who together scored about $1.8 billion in home-state projects. Those senators were Thad Cochran, the senior Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, Richard Shelby of Alabama, and Ted Stevens of Alaska, who was roundly criticized a few years back for winning approval of a “bridge to nowhere” and has been reported to be the target of a federal corruption probe.

All the top spenders are members of the House and Senate Appropriations committees, which dole out federal dollars.

Opponents of the special-interest projects argue that they do not receive adequate oversight.

Among the pork outlined in the group’s report was $188,000 by Maine’s Republican senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and Democratic Representative Thomas Allen to help the Lobster Institute, which the report said is working on a “Lobster Cam” and developing lobster dog biscuits.

Sphere: Related Content

This article by Marty Peretz from The New Republic

Bill Clinton dozed off at the Convent Avenue Baptist Church in Harlem just as his wife was receiving the endorsement (or, more properly, the blessing) of Calvin Butts at Abyssinian Baptist Church, eight or so blocks away.  This church had been the pulpit of Adam Clayton Powell Jr. — “Mr. Jesus” to his congregation, member of Congress and husband to the politically fearless lefty (just one instance: as a witness before the House Un-American Activities Committees) and staggeringly sexual songstress of my youth, Hazel Scott, like Lena Horne.  A randy fellow. I don’t think that black preachers have the sway they once had. Or white ministers, for that matter, except for those who are evangelicals and fundamentalists operating out of humongous mall churches.But back to the black ministers and their diminished sway.  The decline of preacher power is a coming of age of the African-American population, much as it is among Irish and Italian Catholics or Jews or, for a demographically near-fatal shift, mainstream Protestants, who mostly and at best think their ministers are irrelevant.  The black clerisy cannot any longer instruct its parishoners about their voting.  It is an irony, of course, that the Harlem pastorate’s last swing at real political influence over their congregations is for a white woman and against a black man.  Yet it also emphasizes their reactionary cast.  No one since Martin Luther King has anyone so inspired and energized young whites as Barack Obama.  This, then, is a real cross-racial alliance built on the cultural and educational achievements of African-Americans and on the true openness of whites and Asians to their black brothers and sisters. The bond between every Calvin Butts in America and Hillary is the old fix, pliant for the former, patronizing for the latter. And, as for the latter and her husband, it is also ugly.  An article in this morning’s Financial Times by Edward Luce and Stephanie Kirchgaessner makes clear how perilous this is for the Clintons — and for the Democrats, in general.  The most significant trap is that Bill risks making himself the prime issue of his wife’s campaign, two nasty and unimaginably calculating folk baying at Barack Obama whom almost everyone finds gracious. Me too.

There is a calculus to the Clintons trying to make Obama run as the black candidate.  It is to stir up fear in one part of Hillary’s constituency, white women and particularly older white women.  The other goal for Hillary is to turn Obama into a taunt for Hispanic Americans.   After all, there was not one significant black figure in the Clinton administration, except on what you’d have to call the black reservations like Housing.  Yes, there was the supreme fixer outside the administration, probably because he couldn’t get confirmed for anything or no plausible appointment was high enough for him, Vernon Jordan. The Clintons did not offend Hispanic Americans, not at all.  For instance, they made Bill Richardson U.N. ambassador.

One of the largely unexamined frontiers in American politics is the one between African-Americans and Hispanic Americans, and it is at best a frosty frontier.  There are more voting Latinos than there are voting blacks in the electorate, and probably more in the larger states that are soon to have primaries.  Like New York and California on Super Tuesday.  Watch for malicious mischief. 

Sphere: Related Content

Video Via Amy Proctor

Sphere: Related Content

UPDATE: “I wanted to say that I thought Romney was excellent on “Meet the Press” - Folks I’m speechless, fucking amazing!

Romney on Meet the Press: Gun rights/immigration positions under fire

Then of course there are the clueless blind supporters

Evangelicals for Mitt

---

Folks I have been a political junkie for a long time. At 44 years of age, I have followed politics fairly closely since I was in Junior High. Not obsessively or anything, but I grew up around a number of individuals who were well known in political circles in the Bay Area back in the day and I have mentioned these individuals before.My political “give a shit meter” went up significantly during the Reagan presidency and I got to the point of actually studying candidates and scrutinizing them more and more particularly individual on the other side of the political aisle.My political views have not changed much, but I have seen a change in the quality of politicians.

Having said that, I often wonder - could the politicians of yesteryear survive the white hot spotlight of today’s campaigns with You Tube, podcasts, blogs, and all the legions of political pundits who pimp their fictitious knowledge to any interested media outlet eager to fill program time?

I know I’m naïve in saying it, but I would have thought that today’s politicians would have a basic understanding of the media magnifying glass that hovers above them on a daily basis.

Mitt Romney is either totally clueless about this fact or he just does not give a fuck.
He is counting on the fact that the average American citizen is a complete idiot and is not paying attention to the political grind; because he hopes that they are much too busy raising their children, working hard on getting that degree, hard at that nine to five just trying to make ends meet.

Maybe voters aren’t paying attention. Not paying attention because of that long subway ride home, or that tiring bumper to bumper traffic on the 405 or the 95.

Not paying attention because they are focused on that new relationship, or maybe preparing that award wining menu for the upcoming Christmas Party.

Not paying attention because mom or dad may be sick, there has been an untimely death in the family, grief from depression, not being able to get your kids all they want this Christmas.

Not paying attention because they are too busy scheming, trying to figure out the story to tell the wife, while the mistress makes the hotel reservation or busy finding that perfect dress to wear on the town because her friend has found the perfect one for you.

Mitt Romney is counting on the fact that there is just so much to occupy our time and so precious few hours in the day.

Oddly enough there are people like me paying way too much attention to liars like Romney and in addition we are willing to devote some of those precious moments that could be devoted to giving my wife a kiss and a big hug to thank her for being the perfect wife. Or playing with the grandchildren or playing my favorite video game. All of the attention being paid to politicians over the years and I have NEVER ever witnessed a politician that was a big a liar as Mitt Romney.

With apologies to Hillary and Bill Clinton, Mitt Romney is by far the best trained monkey politician I have ever seen.

None of my disdain for Romney should matter. His appearance on Meet the Press this morning should kill his run for the presidency. If it does not, people are simply not paying attention.

I have never heard a politician change a position on a topic in the middle of a sentence as many times as Mitt. What makes this morning’s performance more incredible is that I’m sure he was prepared for what Russert was going to ask him and he still failed miserably.
I had a clip of a recent appearance by Michael Dukakis where he called Mitt Romney a huge fraud. I don’t think that goes far enough. This is a man without any political soul whatsoever. His is incapable of telling the truth on where he stands on an issue, because he doesn’t know where he stands; it depends on who he is trying to convince.
Is it a bunch of Iowa farmers, Christians in South Carolina, the NRA, a group of left leaning types in New Hampshire or an anti-abortion group in Pennsylvania? His position shifts to fit his audience.

He is the most deceitful sack of shit in American politics today.

Now those of you who have been peeping this blog for awhile, should already know that I have never ever given Romney any chance in receiving the Republican nomination, mainly because he was Mormon and I have been ranting about that for awhile.
But I will finally admit that his Mormon, Oops…. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints background will have NOTHING to do with him not receiving the nomination.

He will not receive the nomination because he is a fucken chronic liar. He is more then a chronic flip-flopper. He is a trained monkey, crediting his parents for all his thoughts and motivations, and he truly has no core beliefs of his own.

Oh I did not forget folks the line in the interview where he said that he “literally wept” in 1978 when he heard that the Mormon church had finally decided that blacks could be equal members of that faith.

This has to go down as one of the biggest lies ever told in presidential campaign history.

Almost a bigger load of crap than William Jefferson’s “depends on what the meaning of (is) is”

Although I may disagree with a person’s choice for president during this campaign cycle I can understand the support of virtually all of the candidates on both sides of the political divide. I clearly don’t understand how anybody who is paying attention can support Romney’s candidacy.
This man completely devoid of any core principals should not appeal to any relatively rational voter.

Anybody who after watching “Meet the Press” this morning who would still say that they can support this man for president of the United States is frankly either not wrapped too tight or is an individual who believes that saying whatever needs to be said to get you to your desired goals is a noble endeavor.

People who support Mitt Romney; but don’t want to work for such an individual, be married to or in a relationship with such an individual or raising such an individual, are hypocrites. Chronic lying is wrong and would not be tolerated in any relationship particularly and especially the relationship between this nations president and the American people.

Watch program

---

Romney: I don’t flip-flop, I learn from experience:

Here’s a key quote from Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s appearance this morning on NBC-TV’s Meet the Press, during which most of host Tim Russert’s questions focused on whether Romney has flip-flopped on issues such as abortion, gun control, taxes and health care. Romney said the only issue he’s changed much on is abortion — from effectively “pro-choice” to his current “pro-life” stance. Then, he had this to say:

“Tim, if you’re looking for someone who’s never changed any positions on any policies, then I’m not your guy. I do learn from experience. If you want someone who doesn’t learn from experience — who stubbornly takes a position on a particular act and says ‘well, I’m never changing my view based on what I’ve learned’ — that doesn’t make sense to me.”

Some other things Romney said:

• In his recent speech about religion, his Mormon faith and the role of faith in public life, Romney said “freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom.” Pressed by Russert, Romney said that does not mean atheists cannot also be moral persons.

“On an individual basis you have many individuals of great morality that don’t have a particular faith,” he said. He also said he would not require that Supreme Court nominees be men or women of faith.

• He wept with joy the day in 1978 when he heard that the Mormon church had finally decided that blacks could be equal members of that faith. “You can see what I believed and what my family believed,” he said. “My dad (former Michigan Governor George Romney) marched Martin Luther King. … Those are my fundamental core beliefs.” He was driving when he heard the news and “I pulled over and literally wept.”

• As president he would not seek to outlaw the use of so-called “surplus embryos” for stem-cell research.

• He continues to believe that rival Republican contender Mike Huckabee “owes the president an apology” for saying the Bush administration has been arrogant and has a bunker mentality when it comes to foreign policy. That’s different, Romney insisted, from his criticism of the administration’s handling of the post-combat operations phase of the war in Iraq.

“It is a mess,” he said of the situation in Iraq. “If you’re suggesting that it’s equivalent to say we’ve made a lot of errors … and that the president is arrogant and has a bunker mentality … that’s where (Huckabee) went over the line.”

Russert, by the way, said his guest next week will be Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul. Meet the Press is archiving its interviews with the presidential contenders here.

---

What I was thinking… 

From Wonkette  

My Bullshit Meter — the standards for which Mitt Romney had already raised dramatically — is blinking furiously:

I can remember when, when I heard about the change being made. I was driving home from, I think, it was law school, but I was driving home, going through the Fresh Pond rotary in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I heard it on the radio, and I pulled over and, and literally wept.

Awww, It gave him an opportunity to get fathers for all those immoral Negroes and their gunshootingness.

In case you forgot:
Ann Romney Doesn’t Recall Contribution to Abortion Group

Romney: Gay couples raising kids is the American way

Romney, self-described lifelong hunter, has hunted on two occasions

Sphere: Related Content