politicalpartypoop.com

UPDATE: MALKIN HAS MORE LINKS BELOW

The retired general who asked about gays and lesbians serving in the military at the CNN/YouTube Republican debate on Wednesday is a co-chairman of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s National Military Veterans group.Retired Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr was named a co-chair of the group this month, according to a campaign press release.

He was also active in John F. Kerry’s 2004 campaign for president.

Kerr asked candidates “why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.”

Ok first I did not watch the debate; I have said often that I NEVER watch debates because they are pointless.
You can put me on stage and I can play the role of any presidential candidate and answer a question exactly as they would, well maybe not Hillary because she is such a fucken liar politician she always talks out of her ass.

Now as for this “Clinton Plant” I am finally beginning to see the “inevitability” wall starting to crumble with Mrs. Bill and I don’t blame her so much as I do the people who supposedly support her. She is the ultimate control freak but she can’t keep a tight reign on her idiot supporters who do this stupid shit.
The people in her campaign apparently are not as smart as we all once believed. Her campaign is a public relations disaster and if I were running her campaign I would put my foot up some folks asses.

This question was so unnecessary, the military policy on gays like it or not is working.
I’m trying to understand just what point he was trying to make. Now in the next debate Hillary must now address another issue that was not on her radar and do PR damage control because the focus will again be on the “plant” and not the substance of the question.

What is fascinating to me was a few people trolling the net was able to uncover all these plants within an hour or two, but the Clinton News Network with its world wide resources, liberal fact geeks, editors, reporters either didn’t find that out or didn’t think it was relevant. I mean does CNN think that the average citizen is a retarded dolt? They must think that way.

Now that CNN’s credibility has been pissed on again and we now have this new slate of Democratic flunkies and activists asking questions of Republicans, the new Democrat tactic now seems to be “who gives a shit, they were valid questions, so it really doesn’t matter who asked them.” This is what one dude said on a talk show this morning as I was driving to work. Then what is this “undecided voter” bullshit, why hide your identity?

Let’s use some fucken common sense here if we are not suppose to give a shit about who asked the questions then why didn’t the homo general ask about the economy, lead in toys, or global warming, or the mom with her kids ask about gays in the military?
Because it was convenient for the Democrats to have this decorated fraud ask the question, who is saying something is just as important, if not more important than what is actually being said.

Notice all of the deception deceit, fraud, flip flopping on the Democrat side, reason number 4,210,763 I thank God I’m not a Democrat.

Update: New - Muslim questioner was a former CAIR intern.

Update: CNN on the defensive. CNN’s Glenn Beck comments here.

Update: The foliage keeps blooming…a questioner working with Dick Durbin’s staff and a Richardson supporter masquerading as a Paulbot… and a former Jane Harman intern…and the “Blind Black Republican satirist” (a milder species, but still, all in the same family).

*
From Hot Air: Video: The disappearing Hillary plant; Update: Does it matter who the questions come from?
*
From Sweetness & Light: The Clinton News Network Does It Again

(CNSNews.com) - Former Vice President Al Gore, who recently won the Nobel Peace Prize for his crusade against global warming, thanked NBC’s Today show on Monday for going to the ends of the earth to explore the issue of climate change.In what the Today show billed as a “first,” anchor Matt Lauer — shivering in the bitter cold — reported live from the Arctic Circle, correspondent Ann Curry reported live from Antarctica and weatherman Al Roker was live at the equator.”An incredible broadcast from three extreme locations,” Matt Lauer said at the top of the show. He also admitted he was “freezing my you-know-what off,” as he reported live from a boat off Greenland.Lauer said the Today show would bring viewers “stunning images” as well as information “that’s going to make you stop and think about the state of our planet — how we’re treating it and how it’s going to treat us.”Later on the program, anchor Meredith Vieira interviewed Al Gore about what he called a “planetary emergency.”

“I’ve been trying to tell the story for more than 30 years…and I congratulate the Today show on going to the Artic and Antarctic and the Equator and really going all-out to tell this story,” Gore said.

Gore said winning the Nobel Peace Prize will allow him to “communicate more effectively about the climate crisis.”

He said the climate crisis “is by far the biggest challenge human civilization has ever faced,” and he said 70 million tons of global warming pollutants are flowing into the earth’s atmosphere every day — “as if it’s an open sewer.”

The pollution, Gore said, is trapping the sun’s heat, raising temperatures, melting polar ice, making storms stronger, lengthening and deepening both droughts and floods, and moving tropical diseases into temperate latitudes.

He hailed the “very strong scientific consensus” that the climate crisis is real, that human beings are responsible for it, and that there is still time to solve it.

“The good news is, we can stop it, and solving this crisis will lead to positive changes that improve the quality of our lives,” Gore insisted.

Gore brushed aside criticism from those who question whether human activity is to blame for global warming.

He also criticized the news media for its “old habit” of giving both sides of the story: “There are still people who believe that the earth is flat. But when you’re reporting on a story like the one you’re covering today…you don’t search out someone who still believes the earth is flat and give them equal time.”

Sound familiar…..yup! My post on Friday, from my young liberal friend  “The Liberal Mind”

“I want my news to be straight forward, I trust the people out in the field to give me an honest assessment on what is going on, I don’t need to have multiple sides of issues thrown at me, it’s not necessary and it does not accomplish anything.”
Just the type of freak brainwashed liberal Al Gore targets.

At the end of the interview, Gore repeated that he has “no plans to go back into government service” in any position, but calls for him to run for president persist nevertheless.

At a climate change rally in San Francisco on Saturday, activists carried signs reading, “Draft Gore.”

How much money did the Rudy campaign pay this rag to make him NUMBER 1!??
I won’t be alone in saying this but any poll like this that does not make Rush Limbaugh Number 1 is a joke.

The fact that Rush has been mentioned by name on more occasions (on the floor of the House and Senate no less) than I can count by the top political leaders in this country from Bill Clinton to Harry Reid is evidence enough.

Also if you don’t think there is something really fishy making General Petraeus NUMBER 2 then you’re not paying attention.

With a year to go before voters across the United States go to the polls to elect their 44th president, The Daily Telegraph unveils its list of the 100 most influential conservatives and 100 most influential liberals in America.

Top conservatives: 1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-80 | 81-100 | Your choices

Top liberals: 1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-80 | 81-100 | Your choices

1. RUDY GIULIANI
Republican presidential candidate

2. GENERAL DAVID PETRAEUS
Commander of coalition forces in Iraq

3. MATT DRUDGE
Internet journalist and talk radio host

4. NEWT GINGRICH
Former Speaker of the House of Representatives

5. RUSH LIMBAUGH
Talk radio host

A national phenomenon, Limbaugh’s influence is massive and has endured the test of time. His recent contretemps with Senator Harry Reid was indicative of Limbaugh’s continued power – he raised $2.1 million for military and police families by selling on eBay a letter from the Democrats attacking him. As far back as 1996 he won the ultimate conservative accolade by having Al Franken, a left-wing comedian, pen a volume about him entitled: Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot.

For three hours each day, Limbaugh ranges from waxing philosophical to sounding off about political issues of the day. His theatrical style belies an erudition and painstaking research that his detractors often underestimate. His show began in 1988 and still tops the listenership lists. Often accused of going OTT, he courts controversy and relishes a battle. Any conservative Republican would chew off his own arm to appear on the Limbaugh show.

Previously posted on June 30, 2006
 

rob of wilmington, del. said…
one problem is that you have sites like media matters pointing out use of conservative jargon, but most people only know media matters through the eyes of bill o’reilly and his ilk — trying to suggest that it’s a liberal propaganda site, misrepresenting its purpose.

unless you listen to al franken’s show on air america, you probably won’t get a fair use of (or even frequent mention of) sites like media matters.

———————————————————- 

Soros funded ‘Media Reform’ conference
Featured charges U.S. troops targeting journalists in Iraq
Posted: May 23, 2005 - On World Daily NetTwo of the speakers at the Media Reform conference were David Brock of Media Matters and Andrew Jay Schwartzman of the Media Access Project. Together with Thomas Athans of Democracy Radio, they are backing a “Renew the Fairness Doctrine” campaign to have the FCC monitor and regulate conservative media sources.

Their website is registered to Nicco Mele, the webmaster for Howard Dean’s 2004 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Mele started the Internet strategy group EchoDitto along with several other former members of the Dean Internet team. It now is a consulting firm with close to 20 full-time employees and a variety of high-profile clients and projects.

Those projects include Air America Radio, Alliance For Security, Barack Obama’s U.S. Senate campaign, Campaign For America’s Future, Defenders of Wildlife, Democracy For America, Democracy Radio, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Miramax Books, NoIraqDraft.com, Service Employees International Union and the U.N. World Food Program.

While the Soros-funded “media reform” movement seeks to stifle or mute conservative voices, evidence has emerged that Soros is underwriting journalists who promote his own point of view on major issues.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

———————————-

David Brock Group Backpedals on Soros Funding
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
March 03, 2005(CNSNews.com) - Media Matters for America, the group headed by conservative turned liberal writer David Brock, has changed course on its stated association with billionaire liberal financier George Soros.
After initially claiming on Dec. 1, 2004 that “neither Media Matters nor its president and CEO David Brock has received any money from Soros or from any organization with which he is affiliated,” the group is no longer disavowing any connection with groups “affiliated” with Soros.
The Media Matters shift came after Cybercast News Service questioned the group’s financial ties and demonstrated that there were numerous and extensive links between Media Matters and several Soros “affiliates” like MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress and Soros ally Peter Lewis.
Media Matters for America (MMA) spokeswoman Sally Aman responded to Cybercast News Service’s questions with an e-mail. “In response to your query regarding donor funding Media Matters for America has never received funding directly from George Soros,” Aman stated, no longer denying any relationship with organizations affiliated with Soros.
She went on to reference the “early support from Moveon.org, and the New Democrat Network,” that Media Matters had received.
In its role as a liberal media watchdog, Media Matters for America takes on some of the biggest names in media. Brock also authored the 2002 book, “Blinded by the Right, The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative,” in which he denounced the conservative movement where he first gained fame and disclosed his homosexuality.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

THERE IS MORE…………

Established in May 2004, Media Matters for America is a “web-based, not-for-profit … progressive research and information center” seeking to “systematically monitor a cross-section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation.” But in addition to “news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible,” the organization’s concept of “misinformation” includes anything that “forwards the conservative agenda.” Thus political differences of opinion are often portrayed by Media Matters as lies or worse.Media Matters’ founder and CEO is David Brock. A reporter for the conservative magazine The American Spectator in the 1990s, Brock (in the aftermath of his biography of Hillary Clinton that brought disastrous reviews) engaged in a public self-denunciation, characterizing all his past writings critical of liberal figures as a confection of lies and slanders. In Brock’s present judgment, the mainstream media have fallen under the sway of conservative ideology. He believes that conservatives have moved the mainstream media “to the right and therefore they’ve moved American politics to the right. … I wanted to create an institution [Media Matters] to combat what they’re doing.” 

Standing behind Brock was John Podesta, a former chief of staff in the Clinton administration and the head of the “progressive” Washington, DC think tank, the Center for American Progress. In 2004 Podesta provided Brock with office space for his fledgling enterprise. Soon after, Media Matters received over $2 million in seed donations from a roster of affluent donors including Leo Hindery Jr., a former cable magnate; Susie Tompkins Buell, a co-founder of the fashion company Esprit and a close ally of Senator Hillary Clinton; James Hormel, a San Francisco philanthropist who nearly served as ambassador to Luxembourg during the Clinton administration; Bren Simon, a Democratic activist and the wife of shopping-mall developer Mel Simon; and New York psychologist and philanthropist Gail Furman. Media Matters, which can accept tax-deductible contributions under section 501(c)(3) of the tax code, has also benefited from the patronage of Peter Lewis, chairman of Progressive Corporation and a longtime consort of leftist financier George Soros.

Media Matters has not always been forthcoming about its high-profile backers. In particular, the group has long labored to obscure any financial ties to George Soros. But in March 2003, the Cybercast News Service (CNS) detailed the copious links between Media Matters and several Soros “affiliates”—among them MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, and Peter Lewis. Confronted with this story, a spokesman for the organization explained that “Media Matters for America has never received funding directly from George Soros” (emphasis added), a transparent evasion.

Nor were groups cited by CNS the only connection between Media Matters and Soros. As investigative journalist Byron York has noted, another Soros affiliate that bankrolled Media Matters was the New Democratic Network. In addition, Soros is reported to be involved in the newly formed Democracy Alliance, a partnership of some 80 affluent financiers who each have vowed to contribute $1 million or more in order to build up an ideological infrastructure of leftist thinks tanks and advocacy groups. News reports list Media Matters as a main beneficiary of the Alliance’s funding. By August of 2004, Media Matters’ operating budget had already doubled to $4 million.

Prior to founding Media Matters, David Brock met with a number of leading Democratic Party figures, including Senator Hillary Clinton, former Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, and former Vice President Al Gore. Today, more than a few of the organization’s roughly 30 staff members are Democratic operatives. Among these are Media Matters’ chief communications strategist Dennis Yedwab, who is also the Director of Strategic Resources at Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Brock’s personal assistant, Mandy Vlasz, is a Democratic pollster and a veteran consultant to Democratic campaigns, including the 2000 Gore/Lieberman campaign. Katie Barge, the Director of Research at Media Matters, formerly presided over opposition research for Senator John Edwards‘ unsuccessful 2004 presidential campaign.

In 2004 Media Matters reported that its website had elicited some 150,000 comments in its discussion forums and that over 22,000 subscribers had registered to receive its e-mail alerts. Brock has also become a regular feature on leftist radio stations like Air America.

Media Matters receives financial support from the Tides Foundation, the Arca Foundation, the Peninsula Community Foundation, and the San Francisco Foundation.

Even more here from the blog: Sweetness & Light

Soros/Media Matters Wants Censorship Of Airwaves

Drudge Report:

DAVID BROCK WAS COMMITTED TO MENTAL WARD; BESTSELLING AUTHOR SUFFERED BREAKDOWN WHILE WRITING TELL-ALL, SAY SOURCES

Tuesday May 21, 2002

Controversial author David Brock suffered a breakdown last summer and was committed to the psychiatric ward of Sibley Hospital in Northwest Washington, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

The breakdown came just months before Brock finalized production of his bestselling book BLINDED BY THE RIGHT — a book that has been widely challenged on points of accuracy!

“He had delusions, he thought people were trying to kill him,” reveals a source who befriended Brock last July at the hospital.

Brock told fellow patients that he did not feel safe — even inside of the hospital’s secure medical setting!

“He spent time in the ”The Quiet Room’, there was just a mattress on the floor, and he had some books. He was so tired and stressed.”

Reached by phone in Washington late Tuesday Brock strongly denied the hospitalization and breakdown in any way affected his ability to recall events depicted in BLINDED BY THE RIGHT. Brock strongly denied that any portion of the book was written at the hospital while he was under medical treatments, as is claimed by one source.

Publisher CROWN could not be reached late Tuesday.

Brock’s book of personal observations and first-hand accounts involving various Clinton scandals and scandal players generated divided opinion.

Former President Clinton chatted up Brock’s effort in Los Angeles last weekend.

“Clinton, who seems to have practically committed passages to memory, told his former aides that whenever they feel down, they should read Brock’s book to illuminate anew what they were all fighting against for eight years, and as a reminder of what ‘unhappy’ people their counterparts on the right truly are,” the LOS ANGELES TIMES reported.

But one source familiar with Brock’s breakdown questioned: “With all of this, how can he be considered credible?”

Brock said by phone, “I am not going to comment on private medical matters.”

So it would seem that the gentleman who once famously called Anita Hill “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty” might share some of those characteristics.

Found the following video and 411 on Ed Driscoll dot com

In the above video, James Taranto discusses the difference between what goes on at the typical “peace protest” versus the staggeringly sanitized version that’s reported in the newspaper. Or as I’ve written before, just compare the photos in Zombietime of any Bay Area protest versus how the event is written up by the Victorian gents in your local newspaper. Of course, it was much easier to keep the gates closed on this sort of thing before the Blogosphere, as Sheila Gribben Liaugminas writes in a terrific piece found via Bob Owens.

Of course, occasionally, a paper gets it right. In his Best of the Web column today, Taranto spots a Sacramento alternative weekly with what sounds like–from the headline on–a pretty accurate description of the left’s busywork activities in DC this weekend. “It’s the feel-good story of the season”, Taranto quips.

From the blog WILLisms

Bob Woodward in the Washington Post debunked claims today that Alan Greenspan’s new memoir says the War in Iraq is about an oil grab by the U.S. The article states that oil was indeed a major national security concern of the administration prior to the invasion of Iraq, and rightly so:

a top-secret National Security Presidential Directive, titled “Iraq: Goals, Objectives and Strategy” and signed by Bush in August 2002 — seven months before the invasion — listed as one of many objectives “to minimize disruption in international oil markets.”

Greenspan supported the invasion of Iraq, for much the same reasons:

His main support for Hussein’s ouster, though, was economically motivated. “If Saddam Hussein had been head of Iraq and there was no oil under those sands,” Greenspan said, “our response to him would not have been as strong as it was in the first gulf war. And the second gulf war is an extension of the first. My view is that Saddam, looking over his 30-year history, very clearly was giving evidence of moving towards controlling the Straits of Hormuz, where there are 17, 18, 19 million barrels a day” passing through.

Read the rest here

From Sister Toldjah

Why did the NYT slash $116,000 off the normal rate of a full page ad for MoveOn.org’s disgraceful ad which essentially called General Petraeus a traitor? Charles Hurt from the NY Post reports:

September 13, 2007 — WASHINGTON - The New York Times dramatically slashed its normal rates for a full-page advertisement for MoveOn.org’s ad questioning the integrity of Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq.

Headlined “Cooking the Books for the White House,” the ad which ran in Monday’s Times says Petraeus is “a military man constantly at war with the facts” and concluded - even before he testified before Congress - that “General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us.”

According to Abbe Serphos, director of public relations for the Times, “the open rate for an ad of that size and type is $181,692.”

More

This is one article where I don’t have to even comment on because after you read it you too will roll your eyes and say to yourself “what the fuck!?”

It’s clear that the dude who wrote this article was on crack. No seriously, he was. Besides he is not even original.

Pick your typical idiot Negro superstar athlete and insert name in place of Vick’s.

Poor black kid, yada, yada, yada… single mother, high school dropout, growing up in da hood, around crime, gangs, drugs lots of gold teeth, baggy pants, pit bulls, hair weaves, gin and juice…er uh crunk juice. Yawn.

Reason #4,115 it’s whiteys fault Vick is going to jail.

By Shaun Powell - NY Newsday

Michael Vick is not guilty. No, really, in one sense, despite his plea yesterday, this is the wrong guy.

For months, investigators circled their wagons around the Falcons quarterback with the intensity of blitzing linebackers and implied that Vick masterminded the slaughtering of dozens of dogs who couldn’t cut it in the ring. They cut deals with members of Vick’s posse, who snitched about those brutal dogfights held on his spread in Virginia. Vick, the feds believe, created this.

But who created Vick?

Who gave power and money and influence to someone who has done nothing, other than sling a football, to deserve it?

Who failed to teach him right from wrong, or the importance of making good choices, when they had the chance?

Who unleashed, pardon the expression, Vick on those dogs and turned him into a national disgrace?

Those are the real guilty people. If the feds are correct about Vick’s role, then those people also helped strangle and shoot and drown animals that in essence were poisoned by a man who was poisoned himself long ago.

Personal accountability is definitely in order here, make no mistake. What Vick did was heartless and he should do time. But he’s a symptom of something larger and troubling: a young man led down the wrong path by an upbringing that wasn’t exactly “Leave It to Beaver”; by his “boyz” who leeched off him instead of living their own lives; by a celebrity-inhaling society that elevated him to a god and by a sports league loaded enough to give him a $130-million contract.

Vick didn’t build a cruel kennel with just the help of a couple of buddies; he had help from tons of people, the ones who made him who he is, the ones who shaped his character.

He wasn’t a spoiled, immature and misguided animal abuser from birth. Actually, he was exactly like your child: an innocent sponge, ready to absorb the world around him. Except his world was probably a lot different from the one you exposed to your child.

He was born to a mother who was still in high school, and by the time Brenda Vick was 21, she had four kids. She was a baby with babies, not unusual in poor black America today. How could she teach them about life when she hadn’t experienced life herself? How could she watch her kids when she had to work enough jobs to feed them? Plus, she raised them in the projects, where too many influences are bad.

This was the incubator where Vick’s values and morals were shaped. These were the circumstances that also ruined his younger brother, Marcus, who later would be kicked off the team at Virginia Tech for stomping on another player’s leg and who once was charged with pointing a gun at a group of kids.

Vick was a great athlete in high school and a superstar at Virginia Tech, where football fever runs high and football players - especially the special ones - are treated like they’re, well, special. The coddling of Michael Vick intensified when he arrived in Atlanta as the savior of the Falcons. Interestingly, during a “Monday Night Football” promo a few years ago, Vick was asked what was the best thing about being Michael Vick.

“V-I-P wherever I go,” he exclaimed.

The Falcons gave him a monster contract and essentially handed him the keys to the organization, if not the city. But being rich and famous doesn’t necessarily hide all the character flaws, and Vick had a few. He used his middle fingers to salute the home fans last season. He was charged by a woman with giving her a disease. There was the water bottle incident at the Miami airport this year. He showed a pattern of irresponsibility. And in every misstep until now, the Falcons covered for him, excused his behavior, looked the other way.

Vick also loved the gangsta culture that uses pit bulls as status symbols. He surrounded himself with buddies from back home, some with rap sheets, and bankrolled them. They played by their rules and amused themselves with dogfights that claimed plenty of canine victims.

But you tell me:

Born to a teenage mother, raised in the projects, consumed by a negative culture, back-slapped by vulture “friends” and elevated by a sports-mad society, who’s the real Vick-tim here?

And who’s really guilty?

From Mediabistro.com, funny, you know all of those Negros look alike, LOL!

“As anchor Charles Gibson teased a Tuesday World News story, about DC administrative law judge Roy Pearson’s $54 million lawsuit against a Korean family’s Washington, DC dry cleaning establishment over losing a pair of his pants, viewers saw video of what clearly appeared to be ex-DC Mayor Marion Barry,” NewsBusters says.

ABC quickly apologized. “We immediately recognized the error and corrected all subsequent feeds of the broadcast,” ABCNews.com says. “We are deeply sorry for this mistake and apologize to Mr. Barry, Mr. Pearson, and to our viewers for the error.”

Although Marion Barry is hardly worthy of an apology and this idiot filing this bullshit lawsuit is a crazy ass nigga, this was not a “harmless” mistake.

Broadcast networks claim they work overtime to make sure their news broadcasts are “correct and accurate.”
People who work in this trade are a bunch of anal retentive types who closely monitor shit like this. How the fuck do you mistake Marion “bitch set me up” Marion with this Pearson dude?
Do MSNBC, Fox and now ABC all have idiot (white) interns edit their broadcasts?

No wonder they make so many fucken mistakes, particularly when it comes to identifying darkies on the air. Damm!

I found this clip via a blog post on Lawrence.com our local blog hub here.

This was my two cents….

I peep so many You Tube clips, but few leave me speechless. This is the most embarrassing and one of the most ignorant ass commercials I have ever seen.
However even more amazing is that someone actually finds this shit funny, but who am I to critique someone’s humor index.

I could go the “this is racist” road but that is way too easy. Clearly some idiot white advertising execs thought the ad was “amusing.” and likely some token Negro in the company said “yesa boss that is funny”, think of Uncle Ruckus on the Boondocks.

However, black folks have been producing equally offensive rap videos and other ghetto minstrel shows for BET, VH1, MTV and they obviously don’t care about that, Oh unless some redneck white dude on a radio show, utters “nappy headed hoes”

That idiot show, the Flava of Love I think it’s called and that stupid reality TV show, College Hill, shows the typical ghetto behaviors celebrated in the black community, weaves and grammar hacking in full glory.

One episode in the Flava Flav drama actually had this one chicken head black girl accidentally taking a dump on the floor and many black websites simply yucked up the incident to funny television.

It’s always amusing to ghettoize black folks particularly in advertising. How many times do you see a McDonalds commercial with black folks singing some rap jingle while chomping down on a Big Mac.

Amusing white folks is what we do best.

If Fox News racist, of course not. Now liberals will say something different because they hate the fact that Fox is even on the air because they of course want to control who delivers your news.

Now Snoop has a long memory. Remember this incident:

Monday, 4 February 2002, MSNBC conducted an interview about the “Enron mess” with Niger Innis, national spokesman for the Congress of Racial Equality and political commentator.

During the broadcast, MSNBC mistakenly put up a graphic identifying Mr. Innis as “Nigger Innis”:

According to the Associated Press:

Shortly after [the graphic] appeared, correspondent Gregg Jarrett offered Innis a “profuse apology.”
“Oh, God, I thought you guys thought I was a rapper or something,” Innis replied. “Media bias continues. Just kidding. It’s not the first time it’s happened, but hopefully it’s the last.”

It was strictly a typographical mistake, network spokesman Mark O’Connor said Thursday. He wouldn’t say whether any disciplinary action was taken against the person who made the blunder.

Was MSNBC racist? No. Is it possible that the dude who created the graphic was a racist fuck, yes!

Now I suck at typing, I make a shit load of typos on this blog. I wish I had someone who could edit my rants. However, any individual who is familiar with video production would know that people who put together these graphics and does any editing are almost overly cautious about making mistakes on the air because the embarrassing feedback is immediate and anyone typing the word NIGGER, if he thought that was dudes name would be sweating bullets and asking anyone and everyone, is that REALLY dudes name?

Now, my main problem with the media (ALL THE MEDIA) is the fact that on issues that concerns blacks the media does not even take the time to find black folks to address those issues, and when they do find black folks to comment on topics that are exclusively liberal retard black folks.

Could you imagine yours truly, on Fox or MSNBC commenting on…oh lets say Paris Hilton. My problem with Paris Hilton is not that she is a bimbo skank, my problem with her is that she is a fucken racist bitch, people don’t bring that shit up, only people like me.

The media is a closed club, they only want Barbie and Ken doll media types commenting on serious news and only old white men I guess are qualified to address serious political issues and other important topics.

There are countless days where I have Fox and MSNBC on the tube while at work and I can go an entire day and NEVER see a single black face on TV all damm day.

Now on this particular issue, a good percentage of our population could not recognize the Vice President or even know who their Senator is.
Even if there were a black intern working a Fox, that is no guarantee that they would know who “Dollar” Bill Jefferson was vs Conyers.

Frankly I don’t give a damm because they are both idiot Negro elected crooks anyway. As far as I’m concerned they are one in the same.

I never agree with Oliver Willis on anything, but this subject I have to agree…

NEW YORK, NY - With over 65% of precincts reporting, Al Sharpton has been re-elected as the spokesman for black Americans.

Every four years representatives from broadcast and cable news, newspapers, local television and a few conservative bloggers go to the ballot box and vote to see who will represent “the blacks”. Harry Throckmorton, editorial director for Fox News Channel said “A lot of people say we should look for more black voices in the media, that when a racial issue comes up we shouldn’t just always run to Al Sharpton. To those people I say: I couldn’t make my tee time if I did that.”

“I’m a loudmouth who just says any old thing that comes to my head”, Sharpton told the throng of microphones that follow him 24-7, “and that means the media loves me. Sure, coming to me all the time gives many Americans a warped perspective of what all blacks believe, but hey, what am I going to do - not talk? Better God strike me down dead.”

For his second place finish in the election, Rev. Jesse Jackson will serve as Vice Official Voice Of The Black Man.

Caution Snoop rant:

Let me tell you white folks something in case you were mistaken, Al Sharpton does not speak for me and he is not the spokesman for Black America.

Sharpton is a fucken idiot and an ambulance chaser. However the people who continue to
give Al Sharpton his biggest audience is O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck and the host of other RIGHT WING TV and talk show hosts.

I said before the media the filled with racist bastards on both sides of the political isle how else can you explain why Al Sharpton continues to get so much airtime.

The same house nigga who can’t manage to find a fucken barber, makes his way onto the RIGHT WING talk shows virtually ever damm day, saying the same old tired race baiting bullshit he is famous for.

Putting this bastard, along with Jessie Jackson on TV further illustrates how little most media types think of black people and in particular right leaning black folks like me.

It is almost embarrassing that people like Hannity would engage in conversation with a man who is legendary in his disdain for the American people, and in particular white people while at the same time eroding the credibility of black voices in America.

Out of all of the black people in this country you mean to tell me Fox, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and other can’t possible find a decent, clean, articulate, respectful black person to comment on the news of the day or topics that directly concern black people?

The simple fact that white journalists don’t even bother to hide the fact that they flaunt this ignorant ass Negro clown is even more insulting.

I wish more black folks would speak out on this; unfortunately too many black people are sheep and accept that Sharpton has been dubbed “official nigger spokesman”.

I can hear Hannity saying: “those Negros love this guy, how else can we get them to watch Fox?”

I missed this factor episode…jut FYI if you missed too.

Three years ago, David Brock prepared to launch Media Matters for America. The former conservative and admitted liar had collected $2 million from wealthy liberals, consulted Hillary Clinton and her allies, and set out to decimate conservative media.

As Brock’s nonprofit organization approached its third-year anniversary, the group had its biggest get. They taped radio personality Don Imus making racist and sexist remarks about Rutgers’ University women’s basketball team. Media Matters quickly sent press releases to friendly media and special interest groups.

Brock’s group magnified his language in an attack that would help kill Imus’s radio and TV gigs. Media Matters’ henchmen pounded their chest like schoolyard bullies. Next on their list: Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Ann Coulter and anybody else who dares to embrace conservatism. Even those who report fair articles about conservatives face the maniacal wrath of Brock’s stable of researchers and writers, a group whose majority is culled from left-leaning groups, journalists, students and staffers from former legislators’ offices.

After three years of tax-exempt operation, Media Matters’ credibility as a media watchdog is questionable. Its leader, Brock, is a self-proclaimed liar who strong-armed sources that didn’t agree with him. While writing his mea culpa, “Blinded by the Right,” Brock was hospitalized in a mental facility (scroll down) where he spent time in a “quiet room” and “had delusions, he thought people were trying to kill him,” according to the Drudge Report.

Media Matters stars, including Brock, Eric Alterman and Ryan Chiachiere, are hypocrites who have used the very sexist, bigoted and racist language for which they crucify others, including Imus. They appear to care more about taking out the kneecaps of conservatives than pursuing truth or accuracy in the media. After all, Media Matters certainly allows bigoted posts on their web site — as long as they are directed toward conservatives.

Read the rest of this article here, but my two cents…I always thought it was funny that the left would have to have a website exclusively devoted to “monitoring” talk shows TV shows and any other media activities on the right to provide “insight” on what was said and what YOU should think of what was said and how you should be outraged by what was said.

Do you know how intellectually lazy you must be for you to say to yourself, “I hate that Limbaugh guy, but I’m too lazy and stupid to actually listen to his show so I’m just gonna read Media Matters so they can tell me why I should be hacked off a him”

Maybe it’s just me but I think that is sooooo stupid.

Also check out this article: DNC’s Media Matters Wants Censorship Of Airwaves

From Sister Toldjah 

The online tabloid website TMZ has the scoop:

There is a strong buzz in Hollywood that Rosie O’Donnell will announce Wednesday (April 25th) that she is leaving “The View.”

If it happens, it’s likely Rosie will stick it out through the end of the season.

TMZ has spoken with multiple industry people who say the word is spreading and the info emanated from inside the show itself.

Rosie’s rep could not be reached for comment.

Just a hot rumor at this point, but how much do you want to bet Baba Wawa is hoping it’s true? Despite her public defending of Rosie, someone of Walter’s journalistic caliber has to be secretly embarassed by all the unnecessary attention Big Mouth has drawn to a show most people used to view as of the casual coffee klatch variety.

Read the rest here

I found this piece on Newsbusters. I particularly found it interesting in light of numerous comments I have received on You Tube regarding some of the videos I posted via Fox news.
Many of these crazy ass liberals saying that Fox News is all lies, yada, yada, yada.
Also at my place of business there have been numerous presentations where “respected members of the media” have visited and stated countless numbers of times that blogs are not credible because they ONLY circulate false material.

One nationally recognized columnist said “blogs are like the tabloids, you will never find credible information on them, that’s why I pay no attention to them”

I wish I could give you the name of this retard, but anywho I thought this article was interesting.
So since ABC is a “credible” news source, what was the excuse here?

ABC News tries its hand at sensationalism with a story on the VT killer buying “ammo” on the auction site Ebay, but muffs it badly getting all the relevant facts wrong. But it sure is a good headline…  Ammo from eBay? VT Killer May Have Used Site

ABCNews has learned that in the months before his shooting spree at Virginia Tech, Seung-Hui Cho may have purchased 20 rounds of ammunition through the online auction site eBay.

An eBay account holder who appears to be Cho purchased a two-pack of 10-round ammunition clips for a Walther P22 on March 22, 2007, less than a month before Cho killed 32 people and himself at Virginia Tech. The ammunition was purchased on eBay from Elk Ridge Shooting Supplies for the same type of weapon used by Cho in his bloody rampage last week.

Problem is, Ebay doesn’t sell ammunition… it doesn’t even sell guns. What the VT killer bought were clips (magazines), not “ammo”– if it was even him .
Will ABC News correct itself? Will ABC News admit it was not only misinformed on an easily checked issue, but acted with tabloid journalism to boot?

Keep watching and let’s see.

This from Neal Bortz, what is it with CBS and deception?

 There’s problems at CBS….and it seems all that is old is new again.  CBS must’ve thought when they replaced Dan Rather with Bob Schieffer and then Katie Couric that they would have none of the problems they had with Rather’s forged National Guard documents story.  Unfortunately, they were embarrassed yesterday when it was announced that a CBS producer had been fired for plagiarizing a story Katie Couric posted in her blog and read on the air.  There they go again….blaming the producer.

So we’re told that Couric just posted and read what the producer wrote…not her fault.  Nice cop out there…the media might even let her get away with it.  But doesn’t she check what’s written?  Isn’t she the editor in charge of her own broadcast?  Apparently not….the Wall Street Journal noticed what she was reading was almost exactly what was written in a piece in the Journal.  Oops.  The producer in question was fired and the Journal writer was given credit.

It took a little while for people to notice…seems the CBS Evening News is in third place.  In fact, their ratings are lower than they were with the creaky Bob Schieffer holding up the anchor desk.  But notice the lack of outrage here…..a major network news telecast plagiarizes a story and hardly anyone cares.  Ann Coulter is accused of copying something…and well, that’s a national emergency.

Media bias…this time about the media itself. Amazing, isn’t it?

This by Michael David Smith on NCAA Fan House 

CBS basketball announcer Billy Packer has made his first public comments regarding his use of the word “fag” in an interview with Charlie Rose last week, and he’s not backing down. In fact, while CBS said Packer made a “bad choice of words,” Packer says he’ll say it again.

“I can assure you I will use that phrase again and I won’t think twice about it,” Packer told the Philadelphia Inquirer.

“I said he fagged out on me, and it had nothing to do with sexual connotation,” Packer, 67, said Wednesday in a phone interview. “I got to know Charlie a number of years ago and have great admiration for his program and intellect.”

I initially defended Packer, but I have a harder time doing that now. Packer’s defiance runs in stark contrast to what a CBS spokeswoman said (”I’m confident that he would agree that it was a bad choice of words.”) And by saying he has great respect for Charlie Rose, is he implying that he would feel free to call someone a “fag” if he didn’t have great respect for him?

Clearly Imus has been rattled by a bunch of Negros wanting his removal from MSNBC.

No commentary from me but dude clearly does not “get it” I want to see if someone else has any problems with this clumsy explanation.

Imus: ‘I’ve Learned’ From Remark About Rutgers Team

By Ken Blackwell - Townhall.com 

New York Congressman Maurice Hinchey is on a mission. His Website prominently quotes the congressman’s call to arms, “A diverse American media that presents a wide array of ideas from all sides of the political spectrum is essential to the maintenance of our democracy. If the media becomes corrupted then we’ve begun the erosion of the American political system and the American democracy.”

Before we begin the chorus of amens, it’s important to note the congressman isn’t talking about the evening news on ABC, CBS and NBC. He isn’t talking about the New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, San Francisco Chronicle or even the Cleveland Plain Dealer. And no, he doesn’t care about CNN and MSNBC either. They don’t bother the good representative. He is talking about Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Prager and Michael Medved.

You see, Congressman Hinchey is a liberal and liberals are good at several things. They make entertaining movies and write catchy toe-tapping songs. They even make delicious all natural ice cream. But they can’t figure out talk radio. In fact, they are terrible at it. Al Franken never really competed with Rush Limbaugh as he had promised. And Air America Radio became a better punch line than bottom line.

While liberals hold a virtual monopoly on broadcast television and print news, many on the left just can’t stomach the reality of a dominant conservative presence on talk radio. They want to give Mr. Franken and his pessimism and rage-filed talk radio comrades something they could not obtain on their own – market share.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

 So does that make the “Savage Nation” a nation of idiots?

 (link) On the February 7 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Michael Savage claimed that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice “was chosen by George Bush as part of an affirmative action program in order to make his Cabinet look like America” and called her “a schoolmarm who has been pushed up the ladder all of her life because of social engineering.”

I’ll let that sink in…LOL! what a dope! 

Savage also stated that President Bush’s secretary of state “should have been a man because he would have more respect in the Middle East than does a woman to begin with.”

Later in the same program, after reading the headline of an Associated Press article – “Israeli dig at holy site stirs anger of Muslims” — Savage said: “What doesn’t upset a Muslim? Tell me what doesn’t upset a Muslim somewhere in the world. They have nothing to do but throw bombs and cut people’s throats.”

The Savage Nation reaches more than 8 million listeners each week, according to Talkers Magazine, making it the third most-listened-to talk radio show in the nation, behind only The Rush Limbaugh Show and The Sean Hannity Show.

From the February 7 edition of Talk Radio Network’s The Savage Nation:

SAVAGE: How can a schoolmarm like Condoleezza Rice conceptually deal with the complex problems of this world? She was appointed to the chancellorship at Stanford because of affirmative action. She was chosen by George Bush as part of an affirmative action program in order to make his Cabinet look like America. I mean, do we have to mince words for the rest of our life? She’s over her head. She’s way over her head. Now, you could have picked an African-American person, if you want to call people of color that, but it wouldn’t have been Condoleezza Rice. It should have been a man, it should have been a man who speaks Arabic, it should have been a man because he would have more respect in the Middle East than does a woman to begin with. It has nothing to do with race, it has to do with the fact that she is a schoolmarm who has been pushed up the ladder all of her life because of social engineering.

SAVAGE: “Israeli dig in holy land upsets Muslims.” What doesn’t upset a Muslim? Tell me what doesn’t upset a Muslim somewhere in the world. They have nothing to do but throw bombs and cut people’s throats.

This is from Media Matters and if I’m posting something from Media Matters you know it’s real bad.
I’m trying to force myself to give a shit about what Savage says. I don’t listen to his show all that often. I can’t take him seriously because frankly he is intellectually imbalanced and he caters to the lowest common REDNECK Denominator.
Everything he says is to get ratings; he is the radio equivalent to Keith Olbermann.

He was such an outspoken dude on illegal immigration. So before the elections to show off his so called “independence,” he refused to endorse Republicans.
Then the day after the election it finally occurred to him that a Democratic Congress is now empowered to work with Bush on his amnesty program for illegal immigrants! 
What kind of fucking jackass could not figure that out “before” the election?
He basically sat on his ass and did nothing when it counted most to help stop illegal immigration, because he spent his time bitching about Republicans to gain ratings. 

His attacks on Rush are just retarded and he called Rush Limbaugh a shill for the Republicans, but Rush figured out “before” the election that Bush is not on the ballot, and if the Republicans don’t win Congress, the Democrats will. In other words, Rush passed politics 101 it was obvious that Savage flunked that course.

This dickhead actually wrote a book calling liberalism a mental illness, but dude clearly has a mental illness of his own. He has become another shrill, angry, redneck white guy.

“Senator Mary Landrieu’s outrageous outburst this morning in which she remarked that

“we would have been better off if the terrorists had blown up our levees”

is the latest episode in a stream of recent Democratic blame-shifting and accusations.  Landrieu appears to be joining with Governor Blanco among the ungrateful Louisiana Democrats that seem to have forgotten the federal government has already appropriated billions and billions of dollars of aid to the state and its citizens, only to have Blanco’s Road Home Program set a new standard in bureaucratic inefficiency.  The notion that Louisiana would be better off if terrorists attacked our state should be unthinkable to an elected Senator.  Did she forget the terrorist attacks on our country a few years ago and the suffering that the people of New York and the country as a whole felt?” stated Republican Party of Louisiana Chairman, Roger Villere, Jr.

Read the rest here, but why bother..

Perfect example of absolute mental masturbation. What was that Hussein Obama said in the post Reality vs Perception:

“The arguments of liberals are more often grounded in reason and fact,” 

I swear liberals make blogging so easy, they are incapable of saying anything rational. You just have too close your eyes and pick a news site or a blog and you will find a liberal saying something amazingly stupid.

Matt Lauer on the Today show said this morning on a segment talking about Global Warming:

“A controversy in Washington about what literally could be the end of the world as we know it” - Matt Lauer, Today Show - Segment - Scientists claim pressure on warming

Oh man all I can do is laugh and enjoy. Liberals are so entertaining.  

This is from Newsbusters, I watched this crazy lying ass cow as she scowled at O’Reilly.
If you have a talking head show, if you are