Liberal angst: “I can’t vote for Obama”
Thursday, June 5th, 2008After posting the video below about the website by a Hillary supporter who wants folks to support McCain I just thought this was slightly interesting.
Sphere: Related ContentThey said it: “man this dude is Krazy!” “you sir are an idiot” “you are a lunatic” “are you really black?”
After posting the video below about the website by a Hillary supporter who wants folks to support McCain I just thought this was slightly interesting.
Sphere: Related ContentWhoever organized this crap should be shot. If I had been reading the blogs and was a Hillary supporter and I drove or flew to this event I would be pissed.
I’ll just say I have about 35-40 minutes of raw footage but I cut it of course because this little rally was so fucken lame.
After the one lady playing the guitar there was one other speech and then the rally was over.
They then marched from the park to the hotel and chanted in front of the Marriott where the DNC folks were meeting for a time. I left because I got bored and bad weather was rolling in. In fact by the time I got to my friends apartment all hell broke lose weather wise. If those people stayed there for much more than an hour they were fucked.
Anywho here it tis.
####
Sphere: Related Content
Sphere: Related ContentLast week Air America suspended Randi Rhodes for abusive, obscene language at a recent public appearance in San Francisco which was sponsored by an Air America affiliate station.
Air America Media was informed last night by Ms. Rhodes that she has chosen to terminate her employment with the company.
We wish her well and thank her for past services to Air America. We will soon announce exciting new talent and programming that will accelerate Air America’s growth in the future.
New “talent”… “growth”… at Air America? Are they fucken joking!?
Man I am feeling like shit and have not even been feeling well enough to scan my favorite blog spots.
I wrote this back during the Andrew Young foot in mouth episode some time ago, but I am reposting this with Obama’s retarded ass pastor in mind.
Obama is going to give some major speech on race tomorrow. It no doubt will be filled with a bunch of America loving platitudes and patriotic bullshit as he tries to explain his pastor’s nonsense.
Folks there is one thing I know and that is we all are a bunch of prejudice fucks some more than others. The problem is few are honest about them.
I have heard since these You Tube clips of pastor Wright came out that this kind of anti-American rhetoric is spoken in black churches around the country. Sure instead of explaining your own crap just say “well other Niggas is sayin the same thang.”
Just as Obama decided to raise money for a racist fuck, he decided on that krazy ass church. Typically the type of fiery hate whitey rants are reserved for congregations with low IQ’s and Negros with a permanent chip on their shoulders.
No reasonable black individual would tolerate sitting in that church listening to that bullshit unless they has some significant learning disabilities OR if you were a mixed race black dude trying to prove that you are “down” for the cause.
Now on the campaign trail posing for pictures with giddy young clueless white girls is good political PR but I wonder, how did he reconcile this with his militant pastor?
Obama has a lot of selling to do on this race shit, but the damage has been done.
All he can do now is lie his ass off and try to kiss whitey’s ass to the chagrin of Negros in the hood. Good luck!
*******************
Sphere: Related ContentFirst my customary warning to squeamish individuals who may have found my blog accidentally and therefore may have their heads explode after they read my diatribe.
I need to look into writing a book, or at least having some geek help me write one, maybe I can score movie rights and make a few bucks. What would the title be?
The Unapologetic Negro – My attempt at explaining Negro foibles to White America.I have sat all morning and afternoon trying to come up with something relatively original to try and explain Negros like Andrew Young and someone who most folks would consider a reasonable and thoughtful individual can spout off to a crowd full of other ignorant Negros and say what he did.
First, you must remember, this is the age of You Tube. I don’t care what any MSM journalist, politicians; political pundit says I think the You Tube is the greatest asset to Democracy ever. Simply because ignorant ass people like Young will never ever be able to get away with stunning examples of immense ignorance and get away with it.
It is no longer necessary to have some third party interpret stupidity for us, just post their unfiltered ignorance for the masses to digest.
People I said in an earlier post that what Young said is something that my father might say. Any old black dude 60 plus years of age is likely to have his mindset. Old black men are the most racist people on the planet because they (we) have anger and mistrust from every damm body from back in the day.
Let me come clean on some prejudice issues. As a young man I hated Japanese people. I read, I believe in high school, a speech given by the chairman of Toyota (not 100% sure) I know it was the chairman of one of the automobile manufactures where dude said basically that he did not like the idea of building automotive plants in the United States because they would be forced to hire blacks. Dude basically said that black people were lazy and corrupt and being forced to hire them would hurt the bottom line.
I carried my hatred towards Japanese people for quite some time, in fact, when I went into the Air Force I lobbied hard not to ever be sent to Japan because I did not want to live near them.I believed for the longest time the Japanese people were the most xenophobic mutherfuckers on the planet. One of the reasons why I love General Patton so much he hated and wanted to kill Germans and when he was done he wanted to do the same thing to Japs (as he put it)
Muslims; I mentioned on this blog an incident in high school where we jumped a bunch of Iranian students for burning the American flag; this was during the Iran hostage crisis.
I also mentioned the first kid I ever knew from a foreign country, Hagope who was from Iraq, I was in the fourth grade, so this was 1973 or so. Anywho this kid would go on and on about how crappy America was, and how stupid American were, all the time living in a kick ass house on the hill above mine, both of his parents were surgeons making big time money, but this kid when I first met him could not complete a sentence without ripping America. You think that was by accident!?As a result, for years, exaggerated by the flag burning incident in high school I really hated Muslims or anyone who looked like them. None of the earlier terrorists crap perpetrated by Muslims in the 80’s and early 90’s was hardly a shock to me. I said years ago that one day were would be forced into a war with these people. They will be blowing up buildings and reeking havoc here, led by my little friend Hagope.
I honestly carry much of that angst with me today. Remember this started at what age 9 or 10!
This is another reason why it pisses me off when politicians lie about them claiming that they “change their views on issues or people” fucken liars. Except for my extreme repulse for gay men, most of my basic prejudices are still in tact. I’m just completely honest about them.FYI, my repulse of gays came from my earlier field trips to San Francisco and seeing first hand those gay right parades first hand and watching these freaks jack each other off in public and do other tasteless shit for public amusement. Trust me when I tell you the parades were far worse back then 70’s and 80’s because at least today to some degree gays in their attempt to become more “mainstream” and not be pegged by intolerant people like me as being sexual freak deviant fucks try to keep that ridiculous behavior in check.
Ah Mexicans, growing up in Oakland, tensions between blacks and Mexicans were always at a fever pitch. Fights between Mexicans and blacks were common.
Mexicans were notorious for jumping blacks to intimidate them into staying out of certain parts of the city.
Until I met a good friend John Guiffre in the Air Force I never had a friend or an acquaintance who was Mexican, I could not stand any Spanish speaking individual.
I had Mexicans say to me back then that we “Americans” took their land from them and their goal was to eventually get it back. Now folks I’m 44 so this current outrage with illegal immigration is just amusing to me, Mexicans have been talking about taking shit over since I was a kid. So the prejudice carried on.
John use to joke about “we Mexicans are gonna take over, just wait.” I never took it as a joke, as we all know all humor has some semblance of truth behind it.White people; well my world was torn. When we first moved to our neighborhood in Oakland I had not spent any considerable time around any white people. My first time adventuring out into the hood I came across this little white girl Barbara, she was as curious about me as I was about her. She clearly has never been about any little black boys and asked me questions about everything from my favorite toys to how my hair did that Afro thing. Oh and peep this she even asked did I have to “vacuum” my hair? Seriously, no shit! You white people are so crazy, LOL!
At the time I did not care I was so smitten with her we became best buds. She introduced me to the other kids in the hood, mostly white girls, to the chagrin I of the white daddies in the hood.
All invited me into their homes at first; others strangely enough would never invite me into their homes as we grew older.
Some later admitted that their parents did not like black people and some were told not to associate with me, but they never followed their parents’ advice. They were good friends and I enjoyed talking to them I became their little Negro confidant, LOL!This was my dilemma, the majority of my friends in those early days were white, any I’ll admit something else, the major reason why most of my friends were white was because they never asked me for anything. We shared, our toys, our candy and friendship, we had conversations about all kinds of stuff. Even the racism stuff I and other black kids who would slowly populate the school experienced.
I started to live in two worlds, I would visit my black friends who lived on the other site of Mills College (at that time an all girl’s college) and when I wanted to remain close to home I hung with the white kids. Some other black kids would enter the circle of friends but they were noticeable uncomfortable being around white kids.
Some use to say, “my dad would kill me if he caught me in a white girls house.”My father would not forbid me from entering a white person’s house but he always advised extreme caution. He would say to me “don’t give these white folks a reason to call the police on you, cause they will do so in a minute”
I along with my middle brother were the perfect little Negro kids. I would help the moms carry in groceries and thank them for making me lunch and complement them on their cookies. My brother Chris was doing lawns for some of them, and was even asked to baby-sit one of my friends little babies. In fact they named their new son Christopher because they liked my brother so much.
We were polite, well behaved, respectful, non threatening.
Our yard was well maintained to white standards and no loud James Brown music could be heard coming from out home, LOL!I worked on keeping the good Negro perception because of what my father told me the first day I went to school in Oakland. “Unfair or not, you have to be the representative for black kids because many of these white kids have never been around black kids, their first and only impressions of black people may be a result of how you act and conduct yourself.” Not exactly the quote but damm close.
Others I have told this too just cringe at the notion that my father would put that kind of burden on me, but folks as a man of I dare say again 44, my father was correct.Ok Snoop, bla, bla, bla what does this have to do with Young? (Pastor Wright)
I was fortunate, my being able to slip in and out of the white world taught me a valuable lesson in how to deal with people and how I should deal with people on a person by person basis. I had none of these political victim filters that even someone as well known as Andrew Young (Wright and his followers) suffers from.Although I am a ranting bastard, and still hold some deep seeded prejudices all based on my experiences I relished the thought of learning from the new folks I encountered.
I was able to put away my narrow-minded oh woe is me simple Negro mindset.I dare say that Andrew Young being a former U.S. Ambassador and someone who has participated in far more meaningful stuff that I a whole host of interesting stuff in his career has STILL never been able to shake his old world Negro hostility towards white folks and see them as tools for Negros to use rather than colleagues and individuals who may or may not have good intentions when it comes to dealing with black folks.
Too many of these old guard black folks still see themselves as sitting in the back of the proverbial mental bus. This is why black folks who proclaim themselves to be Republicans or I dare say Conservatives are such an enigma to most of these old dog Negros.
How dare people like I give you evil white people a pass!?
Still far too many black folks think that we all us black folks need to belong to this imaginary “team.” Find some well meaning white person and ride the plantation wagon with them to success are prosperity, usually a Democrat (Bill and Hillary after all they are black).
Obama can’t be that individual because his plantation wagon is not ready for the road; it is not ready to take on the rigors of the rough road necessary for black politicians to succeed.What Young said to these folks was all too typical of what many old black folks say in private. They are enamored by the star political and economic power Negro Bill and Hillary represent.
However Young as are many old dudes still have not been schooled in the era of You Tube, and that you better be careful when divulging the old world Negro secrets to American success and prosperity.
However, despite Young’s ignorance, politics reflect the times, and the times, they are a-changin’. Increasingly, blacks are beginning to realize there is another truth about Negros loyalty to Democrats: It hasn’t been a resounding success.
Because the light is being shed on this type of Negro ignorance, Democrat Negro poverty pimps like Young are looked at with more scrutiny. You folks were never privy to this type of illogical nonsense. I can here some of you, “ah so that is why some black folks are fucked politically, they listen and absorb this lunacy.
It simply is not logical to process the notion the all white people are out to get me.
Yes a number of black pastors want to run this whitey is evil crap because it is beneficial for them to do so. It keeps the Negros in line.I see the airing of Young’s ignorance (Wright’s too) as a positive thing. I am (as of the time I bang this out on a keyboard) still curious as to what the other black rednecks will say about this.
I have searched high and low all day and not found jack. Negros are mysteriously silent, I guess they don’t want to bash a civil right icon too severely or will simple just hope it blows over.So why do some black folks say stupid shit, well you white folks are not suppose to be paying attention, it’s a black thang!
Here is a portion of a piece found on the liberal blog Firedoglake, that I found amusing.
It was a response to We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get? - By Charlotte Allen in the WaPo
Typical liberal stereotypical evil right wing trash fest.
In case you forgot this is the blog that produced this photo:

I am certainly not the only Republican flummoxed by this openly homoerotic hero worship by my fellow Republicans. An acquaintance plans to write a screenplay called “The Golf Course,” in which four Republican men drive around in an electric cart and salaciously fondle their five irons while discussing how to most effectively screw minorities out of their right to vote.
What is it about us Republicans? Why do we always fall for the hyperbole, the ill-conceived ideas, the bulging flightsuit crotches? Just look at what’s #1 on the hardcover nonfiction best seller list of the New York Times: “Liberal Fascism,” by Jonah Goldberg, a paean to half-cocked research, terrible sentence structure, and a shocking paucity of logic! Why must Goldberg perpetuate the stereotype that Republicans are incapable of producing the facts to support our arguments? There’s also Glenn Beck, at #7, reinforcing the notion that Republicans are too dumb to understand evolutionary theory, and Newt Gingrich, weighing in at #8, reminding us that he is the human canker sore on the upper lip of Republican family values.
Television serves us no better. The Sunday morning news programs give Republicans plenty of air time to put our stupidity on display. We can publicly humiliate ourselves by salivating over John McCain with George Stephanopoulos. Tim Russert’s our go-to man when we want to shred a certain female Democratic presidential candidate. Create an echo chamber from the latest White House blast fax? Give Cokie Roberts a call; she’s quite the gifted parrot.
As sad as it may be, several of the alleged myths about 21st-century Republicanism have been proven true. We really do fetishize war and want to drown Medicare and Social Security in a bathtub. The size of our automobiles is inversely proportionate to our “manly characteristic.”
Moreover, a study published by Regent University revealed that Republican men are statistically more prone to closeted gay sex than Democratic men. (The only good news was that closeted Republican men tended to be single, so the revelations of their sex lives didn’t destroy entire families with twelve or more children.) And then there was that study that showed that
liberals are more adaptable than conservatives. Surely, the theory that Republicans are the dumber party is amply supported by the candidates they put forward for President.
I know I’m a bit nuts for occasionally reading retarded liberal shit like this, I’m hardly insulted by it I’m more amused when I read stuff like this.
I am keenly aware that there are a great many leftists who truly think like this retarded bastard.
I’m a conservative dude, always have been always will be, I grew up in the Bay Area in the 1970 and was around some of the most retarded mentally handicapped liberal nuts on the planet. My conservatism is a direct result of growing up and seeing and listening to the craziness of liberal nuts first hand. Not by reading any specific books, listening to talk radio, or absorbing speeches by old right wing icons, or being indoctrinated by some conservative guru I heard on the radio or watched on TV. My disdain for liberalism stems from direct observation of these socially retarded minions.
When I read entries like this I wonder, do individuals who write this
kind of bullshit do so with a straight face?
I understand that there is this never ending battle of ideas and we all are part of it. Despite the calls for civility, I love these battles and believe that these political battles are necessary. Yes they can be nasty and bloody but the idea that “civil” political discourse is somehow possible is grossly naïve.
Both sides routinely borrow from the most extreme examples of social and political ignorance and intellectual vacancy exhibited by folks on the right and the left everyday.
In this piece this individual points out how those of us on the right don’t use facts to support our arguments, but it tis they who routinely gives us shining examples of liberal brilliance and logic everyday. Below are some examples of a few things, shit if I were to lay out every example of liberal nonsense this post would go on forever.
From global warming alarmism, to eco terrorism, race baiting politics, anti-American, socialist propaganda nonsense and the list goes on and on. And somehow this individual says that we on the right are the stupid ones. Seriously are these people really that blind to their own intellectual dishonesty?




From World Net Daily
The top donor to Sen. Hillary Clinton’s 2000 campaign has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission asking the agency to re-open an investigation into illegal contributions and to probe alleged continuing violations of the law by the Democratic presidential candidate.The complaint by business mogul Peter Franklin Paul also asserts the Clinton campaign’s 2005 conciliation agreement with the FEC – in which a finance aide was fined $35,000 – effectively let Clinton and other top aides off the hook.
Paul says that unless the FEC sets aside the agreement and rescinds immunity granted the senator, the agency itself will “have aided and abetted in the commission” of a felony.
As WND reported, Clinton is seeking dismissal from a $17 million fraud case filed by Paul in which her husband already is a defendant. Paul is appealing Sen. Clinton’s removal to the California Supreme Court, but whether or not she is a defendant, she will be required to testify as a material witness in a trial this year.
In May 2005, Sen. Clinton’s former finance director, David Rosen, was acquitted for filing false campaign reports that later were charged by the FEC to treasurer Andrew Grossman, who accepted responsibility in the conciliation agreement. Paul points out the Rosen trial established his contention that he personally gave more than $1.2 million to Clinton’s campaign for a lavish Hollywood fundraiser in August 2000 and that his contributions intentionally were hidden from the public and the FEC.
More from Rush, amazing
Sphere: Related ContentThere is a journalist by the name of David Hazinski. This guy’s a journalism professor, a former journalist, journalism professor at some out-of-the-way college.Here it is: He’s an associate professor of telecommunications and head of broadcast news at the University of Georgia’s Grady College of Journalism, University of Georgia journalism professor. He says: “Unfettered ‘Citizen Journalism’ Too Risky” YouTube, blogs, unregulated, it’s too risky. They gotta get rid of this stuff.
He thinks that regulation is the only way to have proper news. He thinks in this piece — it’s the Atlanta Urinal-Constipation on the 13th of December — he says that citizen journalism, like blogs or YouTube, isn’t really journalism, it opens the industry to “fraud and abuse,” as though there is no fraud and abuse!
NBC didn’t blow up the trucks for Dateline NBC. ABC didn’t dress people up like Muslims and send them into a pack of Christians and hope for the best. No, no, no! There’s no fraud and abuse in the Drive-Bys. CBS didn’t have Dan Rather on. Those fraudulent documents? Of course not, Mr. What’s Your Name — Hazinski.
No fraud and abuse in the Drive-Bys. Why do you think the New Media is rising? Because your precious journalism industry is crashing. Nobody trusts it! Well, more and more people don’t trust it. So, a typical lib: Rather than letting the public decide what they want to read or watch, the better idea is to regulate! Monitor and regulate this new industry, the Internet and blogs. Does “regulate” sound like a “mandate” to you? Regulate health care, mandate health care.
This professor wants what he considers to be the legitimate journalism outlets to find a way to regulate citizen journalism. This would include political blogs, which is basically what my website is, RushLimbaugh.com, except I’m not a journalist, but he wants to regulate it.
By the way, CNN is now using blogs. All the Drive-Bys are trying to incorporate YouTube and all these blogs. They’re having bloggers on as analysts. The genie is out of the bottle, Mr. Hazinski.
Dog Chapman comes back to bite ranting white liberal’s.
I was tipped off to this story (White Supremacist Sympathizer Sean Hannity Helps Duane “Dog” Chapman Rehabilitate His Racist Image) and had the same reaction I usually do when white liberal types seemingly come to the rescue of black folks.
The individual who hammered out this shining example of fake white liberal outrage, after posting this particular story, I bet felt vindicated in some way; proud and believing that by her shining a light on the disgraceful racist Dog Chapman and his racist support network (comprised of Sean Hannity and Roy Innis) we would no longer be fooled by the notion that this hateful racist can be rehabilitated and in particular that we would remain angry at the professional racist Hannity who provides safe sanctuary to racists everywhere. After all, she is sure that those of us on the right, and particularly networks like Fox, promote racist values.
Ah but let’s not forget that Ellen is likely part of the elitist social network of liberals who are the conveyers of truth, justice and the liberal way.
This hack sites tag line: “We watch FOX so you don’t have to.” Can you imagine anything as outrageous as a website devoted to telling you what to think about a given topic?
Anywho, Hannity and Innis in an attempt at rehabilitating Chapman’s image have obviously touched a nerve in the white liberal “protect a darkie” community.
First of all - do I personally think the Dog Chapman is a racist? I’m not sure, maybe, but frankly I don’t give a shit.
His tirade on the infamous answering machine audio is one that is symptomatic of how many white people feel privately. Chapman, in addition, has parental issues that far exceed most father and son relationships.
As strained as my relationship with my father has been over the years there is nothing that would drive me to release an audio of a private family moment for public consumption.
The “bring a Negro” home to mommy and daddy scenario is one that a growing number of families must struggle with. It was a struggle with Mrs. Snoop’s parents, her father in tears at the notion that his wonderful first born lawyer daughter would marry some rogue Negro. It drove the man to tears, and not tears of joy.
I’m sure I was not the first and won’t be the last Negro introduced to skeptical white parents.
As for Chapman’s tirade on his son’s relationship, I never found his N-word rants as objectionable as most people seem to.
Certainly if the majority of you white folks reading this particular piece were to have every private conversation scrutinized a great number of you would be guilty of what I would guess would be called racial insensitivity.
I spent a lot of time out on the front steps of many homes upon my arrival because I was not allowed in many homes in my new neighborhood in Oakland amongst the lily white commune who believed that they insulated themselves from those unacceptable Negros that populated the city.
These individuals were your typical white liberal types in the Bay Area that would proudly tell you that they gave their all in support of “black” causes. However, when it came to their families and personal lives they wanted to be as far away from these Negros as possible.
Kind of like the fake outrage liberals had for Katrina victims because they could pin the calamity squarely on George Bush, because it made good political theatre and would provide the necessary imagery needed to display Republicans racist contempt for black people.
For me personally, I was able throughout my life to dip in and out of the “white” world.
From parties given by friends and acquaintances, countless community and social settings and work environments from my interactions I always knew that not all white people were not out to get me, a good number frankly were too busy unraveling their own lives to worry about what your typical black person was doing.
Duane “Dog” Chapman lived and operated in a world where he routinely dealt with the most screwed up Negros in American society.
Chris Rock said in a memorable stand up routine that “there are black folks and there are Niggas” and like him I hate me some Niggas.
I’m certain that I would find most of the “Niggers” that Chapman dealt with as contemptible as he obviously did, hence his ambivalence towards “some” black people.
The individual who wrote the above article seems to take issue that anybody, particularly an individual like Roy Innis who was active in the civil rights movement, would so eagerly come to the Dog’s defense, not to mention that a “white supremacist sympathizer” like Sean Hannity would also come to his defense and try to make excuses for Dogs racist tirade.
Innis and Hannity teaming up to try and rehabilitate Dog’s image.
Can you rehabilitate a racist? Who knows, but can you rehabilitate a pompous white liberal? I would bet that would be far more difficult.
What most folks always forget when engaging in the discussion of race is that virtually all liberal white people see most minorities, and in particular black folks, as pets.
White liberals in power have a patronizing way when it comes to dealing with black people. They think they are setting an example for the uneducated and ignorant to see their caring way is the correct way, despite the fact that most of their present-day physical, intellectual, and political orbits remain mostly segregated.
Liberal racists, both white and black, focused on separatism and racial difference. Instead of subscribing to MLK’s belief in a color-blind society, they pushed for government policies that were color-coded. The further America progressed from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted that slavery was present throughout America’s social institutions and its personal interrelationships.
America was steeped in blood and guilt; it must pay for its crimes against Negros everywhere, so they are compelled to come to the rescue many times in the literary sense as did this Ellen character.
These are the individuals who populate the majority of America’s newsrooms and comprise websites like Newshound and Media Matters.
Her contempt for Hannity’s and Innis’s and their symbolic gesture of reaching out to this fallen soul was based upon feelings that this liberal chick could not stand. She obviously does not believe that every story has two sides to it.
However we all know that this particular piece is more about discrediting Hannity than anything else. We all know that Republicans are professional racists, and these on air racist media moguls need to be discredited because it fits into the desired plan of demeaning right leaning views simply for political gain.
How does fake outrage by some liberal chick benefit me? It doesn’t. It’s just one more example of someone who likely spends very little time around black folks and certainly someone who likely has little contact with Negros who simply are not obsessed with
the race based tirade of a Mullet pimping bounty hunter and in particular Negros who refuse to see themselves as victims.
I have never had this raced based anger at white folks that liberals feed off and think all smart blacks must feel. With the love and guidance of my parents I simply have never been ashamed of what I saw in the mirror. Most anger that black folks tend to have towards whites is more symptomatic of self hatred. So who better to blame than whitey. Liberal Democrats like to guide you towards a more specific beast, evil right wingers like Rush and Hannity.
For me I took to heart at an early age Dr. King’s notion that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Nevertheless, white liberal types have marginalized this notion as quaint and naive.
Far too many liberals hide behind the delusion that anyone who votes for Democrats and doesn’t have a pointy hood in the closet is “a good guy” in the movement toward greater social justice, as though the Democratic Party is some bastion of progressivism.
Ellen is your emblematic color-blind liberal whose menacing paternalism, dehumanizing tokenism, and cognitive indoctrination oozes out between superficially progressive words and deeds.
I bet that liberals like Ellen who read this will turn on the victimized act and bemoan the fact that a hostile Negro like I would attempt to burst their liberal racism free bubble. I’m certain she would be like most defensive liberals inexplicably bringing up their Negro friends, lovers, adopted children, relatives, ancestors; dismissing, belittling, misreading the substantive informed Negro analysis that someone like I would provide. In order for her to feel better, she has to pretend that I am some how not authentically black enough to have an informed opinion.
Now I must not be too harsh, not all white liberals are like this. There are some white liberals are actually interested in learning and understanding that not all of us black folks are still wearing shackles around our ankles, although some still symbolically wear shackles around the mind.
My message to Ellen simply would be this ” Frankly, we black folks don’t need you white liberals to come to our rescue.”
Although Chapman’s words, as disgraceful as they were, only reveals that he has a heart that obviously is filled with pain and anger - but most of all ignorance.
Only God can decipher his perceived racial hostility and only he can know if his rehabilitation is genuine, or if it is simply to get back the financial rewards that his popularity from his cartoonish persona provided him.
Mr. Chapman’s racial conundrum and reclamation project is hardly something that most Negros are concerned with, nor is Innis’s participation.
As I have said many times, the most dangerous racists in this society are not ranting mullet sporting Confederate flag waving neo-Nazi types.
The bigger dangers are more likely to come from race baiting, poverty pimping, social
engineering liberals who continue to view blacks and other minorities as political and ideological tools to obtain and remain in power. These types view blacks as lab rats on whom they can test their elitist sociological mad scientist experiments in their attempt to shape society in their liberal utopia image.
No flags or swastikas to identify them, but we can still spot them. Just look for more articles written by the Ellen’s of the world.
Sphere: Related Content
I was scanning through some of my blog link backs and came across this dude who apparently found my blog via BlogExplosion and was shocked by what he saw…
“this guy (who calls himself Snoop by the way) is one of the meanest bloggers I have come across. Nobody is off limits; I’m not sure where his anger comes from. He is a very bitter individual”
I started to link back, and I started to respond on his blog but I said why bother.
Someone, anyone… (I know I’m taking to a fucken wall here, only my buddies Melvin and Jason understand me… boo hoo!) …ok someone please explain to my why I have to be considered bitter, angry, nasty, mean because I have definite opinions?
Blogging is as good a medicine for me than the Lexapro I take.
C’mon I’m a nice sweet lovable guy, just ask any of my Teddy bears, LOL!
Sphere: Related ContentFrom Moonbattery
Clinton spinner Mark Penn dug himself into a ridiculous hole while trying to discredit a Zogby poll showing the top five Republican candidates all beating Shrillary (video, via NewsBusters).Sphere: Related ContentPenn’s claim that this was the first time Zogby had done an online poll is particularly absurd considering that Penn’s company has been requesting the results of their online polls for years. As Zogby Director of Communications Fritz Wenzel points out:
What is interesting is that no other campaign has made as many requests for Zogby polling data over the years than Penn has made on behalf of Clinton.
There is a line between spinning desperately and telling hysterical lies. Penn plunged across it.
Found via Hot Air, from the Daily Kos
We won’t wait anymore.
Since Congress, particularly the congressional leadership, refuses to do so, my wife and I are personally defunding the war and occupation of Iraq. We refuse for the foreseeable future to surrender the portion of our taxes that pays for U.S. imperialism and the militarization which backs it up. We’re inventing nothing, merely joining with thousands of other war-tax protesters whose history on the North American continent dates back to 1637 when the Algonquins refused to pay a Dutch tax levied to remodel a fort built in the midst of these Indians to control them on their own land.
Our action may seem pitiful in that it amounts to cutting off money to Iraq for about as long as it takes you to read half this sentence. Moreover, if it wishes, the government can extract even that pittance from us by force. But only if officials are willing to expend more money to collect from us than they will obtain in the process.
We take this action reluctantly, fully aware of the potential consequences. But Congress leaves us no choice.
Read the rest here and try not to laugh!
Sphere: Related ContentFolks I just got hit by a brick. Haters, wipe that smile off your face, not literally but figuratively.
I’m having a conversation with a young college student, nice young man, great guy, and smart, involved but very Democrat and liberal.
He pokes me about some e-mails I sent to a colleague about the myth of global warming, from my essential stack of stuff internet pile and blog archives.
Just as most bloggers I read so much material and I try to organize and bookmark articles on various topics so when leftists run the standard talking points on whatever topic I can bombard them with information until they cry uncle.
However as many of you on the right know when we present those on the left with information its called “propaganda.”
Anywho, I’m talking to this young man and we chat a bit on global warming and other topics and he make a startling statement “there simply aren’t two sides to every issue, and global warming is one of those issues.”
Yes I know some of you are like well duh Snoop, that’s how all leftists think, but I was taken aback by his candor.
We then started talking about a few other issues, school vouchers being one. I asked, do you believe that a parent has a fundamental right to send their kids to the school of their choice. He would not answer (I told him to stop playing Hillary and answer) ah, but he was steadfast and said “any voucher program would destroy the foundation of public education.”
Now keep in mind this is a very well (won’t say rich kid, but close) off soon to be a degreed higher education graduate, private school taught.
While switching to various topics he brings up Fox News, he says “I bet you like Fox News because you like the combative nature of their reporting.” I asked him to clarify and he says;
“I want my news to be straight forward, I trust the people out in the field to give me an honest assessment on what is going on, I don’t need to have multiple sides of issues thrown at me, it’s not necessary and it does not accomplish anything. On issues like the war in Iraq, there are not two sides of that issue; we simply should not be there.”
So we switch gears and I ask about Hillary and her promoting the issues of drivers licenses for illegal immigrants, he says;
“she’s right, they should have drivers licenses, I don’t see what is wrong with that. Mainstream media sources would simply report how immigrants having licenses would be a good thing, Fox News however would report on the sinister nature of immigrants having licenses and report on all of the negative instances where illegal immigrants did something bad and would spin the issue in a negative manner”
Now people again, this is not some earth shattering revelation, but this comes from a very smart, driven young man who likely will be a CEO somewhere in the future or someone who I believe will be a big time politician one day, no joke.
I found this conversation enlightening, I don’t openly talk politics with people because like this blog I’m VERY honest about my opinions and some my take my candor the wrong way and frankly many are uncomfortable.
When I put my conversation with the young dude with the chat with my global warming alarmist 40 something co-worker (who says she can’t understand how anyone can not believe that global warming is real) I still can’t help but be struck by the level of resoluteness on issues that even they admittedly know little about.
My global warming friends’ main resource for knowledge on the issue is Gore’s Powerpoint flick!
I’m just left wondering how do you develop that kind of a closed mindset.
Now don’t get me wrong, as I have said, I’m very opinionated, and have very definite views, but even at my age I would never proclaim that there can’t be two sides to some of America’s most complex issues.
These two individuals are symptomatic of today’s liberal Democrats, brainwashed by MSM misinformation, and resistant to any line of thinking that would challenge their realities.
I don’t know whether or not to be amused or frightened.
Sphere: Related ContentSphere: Related ContentThe human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist.
100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed.
The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.
These humans will be between 6ft and 7ft tall and they will live up to 120 years.
“Physical features will be driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility that men and women have evolved to look for in potential mates,” says the report, which suggests that advances in cosmetic surgery and other body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance.
Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men’s satellite TV channel Bravo.
Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless
skin, large eyes and pert breasts, according to Curry.
Racial differences will be a thing of the past as interbreeding produces a single coffee-coloured skin tone.
The future for our descendants isn’t all long life, perfect bodies and chiselled features, however.
While humans will reach their peak in 1000 years’ time, 10,000 years later our reliance on technology will have begun to dramatically change our appearance.
Medicine will weaken our immune system and we will begin to appear more child-like.
Dr Curry said: “The report suggests that the future of man will be a story of the good, the bad and the ugly.
“While science and technology have the potential to create an ideal habitat for humanity over the next millennium, there is the possibility of a monumental genetic hangover over the subsequent millennia due to an over-reliance on technology reducing our natural capacity to resist disease, or our evolved ability to get along with each other.
“After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’.”
Dr Curry’s theory may strike a chord with readers who have read H G Wells’ classic novel The Time Machine, in particular his descriptions of the Eloi and the Morlock races.
In the 1895 book, the human race has evolved into two distinct species, the highly intelligent and wealthy Eloi and the frightening, animalistic Morlock who are destined to work underground to keep the Eloi happy.
Ah I knew it was coming, well it’s not like you need a masters degree to decipher liberal logic. Right Wing News has the following:The Daily Kos Post Of The Day: George Bush Is Responsible For The California Wildfires.
I think everybody should read liberal blogs, it’s good medicine. I read that laughing increases your longevity:
Laughing reduces stress hormones like adrenaline (epinephrine) and cortisol. It also benefits your immune system by increasing the number and activity of Natural Killer T-cells.
It is almost impossible for me to read a liberal blog and not laugh. I sometimes think some of the shit I read on lefty blogs is just bullshit, a set-up, to tease us right thinking folks, like a bad joke, but you see it everywhere, it’s not a joke to them, just like this idiot responding to me below about Gore.
I just wonder, what in the hell are these crazy folks gonna do when Bush leaves office?
On to the post…
Sphere: Related ContentIf you regularly read liberal blogs, one thing you will quickly learn is that all roads inevitably lead to George W. Bush.If Bush supports a policy, it’s bad, merely by virtue of the fact that Bush supports it. If Bush says something, it’s a lie, merely by virtue of the fact that Bush said it. If something bad happens, Bush must be responsible somehow, because he is the root of all evil in the world.The latest tragedy that Chimpy McBushHitler is apparently the cause of is the California wildfires.Now you may be thinking, “Gee, those wildfires are terrible, but how can the Kos kids blame Bush for them? After all, wildfires in California aren’t exactly an unusual occurrence.”
If that’s where you’re coming from, have no worries, because the aptly named Daily Kos diarist, “The Wonder Moron” — no really, that’s his nickname — will explain it all to you,
And Now California: The disasters of the Bush Era…Now comes California’s turn. Unfortunately, all these locations happen to be areas where the poltics are mostly Democratic. So don’t expect much help. In the past, Bush takes the opportunity to show up, make a speech, make a bunch of promises, then moves on.
The pattern is established.
…Global warming appears to cause the subtropical highs that sit over the oceans to enlarge and intensify. On the east coast this means more intense tropical storms. On the west coast, this means that the sub-tropical highs that traditionally drifted north from below 30 degrees latitude during the summer - creating the Mediterranean climate of dry summers and wet winters - stay longer and maybe projecting themselves farther north during the winters. As a result the amount of rainfall in the west and snowfall in the rockies during the winter diminishes. In essence the desert that exist on the west coast of all continents below 30 degrees (the Sahara in North Africa, Kalahari Desert in South Africa, the Atacama in Chile, Great Sandy Desert in Australia) seems to be expanding northword.
(link) Several African-American leaders, including the Rev. Al Sharpton and Martin Luther King III, are expected to gather in Atlanta on Tuesday morning to announce a march on Washington, D.C., to demand that federal authorities intervene in the “huge outbreak” of hate crimes nationwide.The gathering will take place at 10 a.m. outside the Richard B. Russell building in downtown Atlanta.Charles Steele, the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, is scheduled to attend, as are representatives from the Nation of Islam and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
At the gathering, organizers will formally announce plans for the march on the nation’s capital that will take place Nov. 16.
“In the history of the civil rights movements, we have often had to appeal to the federal government to intervene. That was certainly the case during my father’s era of leadership,” King said Monday night. “[The march next month] is an appeal to the federal government to do something about the crimes, such as the nooses that seem to be popping up all over the nation.”
Since a noose-hanging case on a high school campus in Jena, La., made headlines, there have been a number of other nooses found in incidents across the country: in a black Coast Guard cadet’s bag, on a Maryland college campus and, earlier this month, on the office door of a black professor at Columbia University in New York.
In Atlanta last week, a worker at a construction site for Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport was fired for hanging a noose.
“Some people say it’s a prank or a joke. But there are some things you just don’t joke about,” King said.
Nooses are a symbol of the lynching violence of the segregation era.
Aw damm, more of this noose bullshit, I swear I’m getting really tire of this crap.
Regular readers already know what I’m about to say, but what the fuck, let’s make it official!
I’m not concerned about some idiot redneck hanging a noose as a joke, no more than I’m concerned about any neo-Nazi retards or Confederate flag pimping mullet heads.
I’ll tell you if you are a Negro growing up in the hood, Philadelphia, D.C., Detroit, NOLA dudes with sheets are not the ones conducting drive bys, pimping drugs, popin’ caps in the collective asses of other Negro residents and if you are in L.A black folks are the targets of illegal Mexican gangs.
What the hell nooses are in vogue now, I bet some enterprising dude will come up with runway fashions featuring nooses as a neckwear accessory.
Just think making the noose a fashion accessory would be like Negros using the word Nigger as a term of endearment between brothas.
Now just like the use of the word Nigger, you white people would not be allowed to wear the noose, you would be called a racist!
Sphere: Related ContentFrom the blog Gateway Pundit, via Sister Toldjah
Lie.
Nutrooters Crooks and Liars discovers that if you can’t possibly win an argument over the latest disgusting anti-military, anti-Bush remarks by a Democratic politician…
Then just lie about it. This is how Crooks and Liars reported the remarks by Rep. Pete Stark said on the House Floor on Thursday:“I’m just amazed that the Republicans are worried that we can’t pay for insuring an additional 10 million children. They sure don’t care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal War in Iraq.”
“President Bush’s statements about children’s health shouldn’t be taken any more seriously than his lies about the War in Iraq. The truth is that that Bush just likes to blow things up – in Iraq, in the United States, and in Congress.”
And… Here is what Rep. Pete Stark actually said on the House Floor on Thursday that was so outrageous and offensive:
“They sure don’t care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal war in Iraq. Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you’re telling us today? Is that how you’re going to fund the war? You don’t have money to fund the war or children but you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President’s amusement.”
Read the rest here on Gateway Pundit
Also while you’re there also check out: WaPo’s Ice Cap Report Is Snow Job
Sphere: Related Content
Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Wednesday the Senate should apologize for slavery and segregation, calling them “dark chapters in our history.”McCain said he would support a planned resolution by fellow Republican Sen. Sam Brownback, who is also seeking the presidency, to apologize for racist laws, some of which ended more than a century ago.“They were federal policies,” Brownback told the Boston Globe on Monday. “They were wrong. The only way for us to move forward . . . is at the end of the day acknowledging those, taking ownership for it, and asking for forgiveness.”McCain agreed with Brownback’s approach.
Read the rest, but why bother…
Oh it’s Friday, beautiful day outside, looking forward to the football games this weeken
d, scanning a few more blogs and I find several posting of this story.
What the hell people, if there are some of you white people out there that still feel guilty about WHAT YOUR PEOPLE DID TO OUR PEOPLE, then send that guilt my way, in the form of a check or credit card payment.
I’ll put one of those Pay Pal thingies on my site and you can contribute to the “Snoop Save A Negro Foundation” I of course will be the designated Negros you will be saving.
I will then send you a certificate absolving you of any more guilt from your ancestors horrendous treatment of Negros.
You will also be given a Negro Ghetto Pass, which will allow you safe passage through any hood in the country. Also tickets and red carpet passes to all of the Negro gala events like the BET Hip Hop Awards, The Source Awards and the NAACP Image Awards.
And don’t forget a coupon for a years supply of Popeye’s Chicken!
You will also get the Rosetta Stone Ebonics Edition, the best in Language Learning software.
And there is more!
You will also get your own personalized Pimp Juice Pimp Cup, collect the full set and show off to your other whitey friends at work or at your next dinner party.
And don’t forget…
You will also receive a special signed thank you letter from the Justus Brothers, Jessie and Al and a coomerative framed photo of the Jena 6.
Don’t continue to feel guilty, contribute to the Snoop Save a Negro Foundation and feel guilty, no more.
Sphere: Related ContentUPDATE: HARRY REID PRAISES AUCTION ON SENATE FLOOR…
UPDATE: $2,100,100 TOP BID FOR DEM LETTER BASHING LIMBAUGH…
Largest charity bid in the history of EBAY? Jay Leno’s Harley went for $800,000…
AND THE WINNER IS: BETTY CASEY…
Download the Harry Reid Letter (PDF)
Rush Discusses the Reid Auction This Morning on FNC’s Fox & Friends (WMP)
Sphere: Related ContentAs y’all know I’m a BIG Thompson supporter with a personal connection to the campaign.
I have a good vibe about him and I do believe he will make a fine Prez.
BUT…BUT this debate today is an important one, and I have to be honest it will be the first debate I will watch in total, not because any of the previous candidates are going to say anything worth a damm, but Thompson has to kick ass, he needs to bitch slap these other worthless candidates.
I am still pissed that losers like Brownback and Paul are participating it is a waist of time and energy to have to listen to them.
Paul should just drop out of these debates and run as a Libertarian candidate, shit he is raising the money and his crazy supporters are rabid enough to make him an effective vote stealer. Frankly, the fact that he says he will NOT run as a Libertarian shows me he is not as serious on the core issues that fires up his supporters as he says he is.
Anywho, Thompson must have a superior showing or else he may be doomed.
I may be wrong, (I DOUBT IT, I’M RARELY WRONG ON SUCH THINGS) I called on his candidacy long before rumors of it started flowing, a strong showing can all but eliminate Romney and McCain. As far as I’m concerned it’s between Rudy, Fred and Mike. YES MIKE.
A weak or lethargic performance by Thompson, will just cause more tumult within the GOP ranks.
I hope his campaign staff has him ready, I hope he is ready.
I’ll take aspirin or I will have a Long Island at lunch in order to deal with Chris Matthews irritating voice.
Here is what others are posting on Fred:
Fred Thompson — who starred with Albert Brooks in “Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World,” above — seems to have little trouble commanding the screen, but is having a few more problems commanding a campaign trail. He’s described as “low-key” on the campaign trail, but you can be too low-key — aka boring. I basically felt all the excitement over a Thompson candidate fizzle even before he officially announced he was running, when Thompson said, “I’ve never craved the job of president, but I want to do some things that only a president can do.” That just translated into really not giving a hoot. Or someone who wants power without a whole lotta responsibility. Or someone who’s just, well, boring. more
My problem with Fred Thompson is that I think he has been overhyped. He’s someone I wanted to like - I really did. And I don’t use past tense to suggest I never will like him, but at this stage in the game I don’t see him as presidential material, and I say that as someone who hasn’t warmed up to Romney or Rudy, either, although Romney initially sounded appealing. I’m still in the undecided camp.Thompson’s nice enough and I do believe he is bonafide conservative, but what he offers in speech after speech and interview after interview is little more than platitudes without specifics. Senior editor Quin Hilyer at the American Spectator is similarly frustrated - More
On Blogs for Thompson, live blogger conference call with Fred Thompson’s campaign manager, Bill Lacy
Lacy, speaking for himself, believes that the Republican Party is at a crossroads, and Thompson believes in taking in a “Goldwater direction,” with emphasis on government reform. He has done a number of mock debates and a lot of prep. He said that he learned in 1994 that one good thing about Thompson is that he was a very successful trial lawyer and knows how to prepare himself for debates.
Lacy doesn’t see him directly going after Giuliani or Romney tonight. It’s going to be focused on defining him, and may not be a time to throw darts.