Liberal Democrat racism hypocrisy exposed…. AGAIN!
Tuesday, May 13th, 2008
Shocker!… Dems Scream Racism Over Republican Ad Then Are Busted Passing Out Bogus KKK Flyers!
This is suppose to be a racist ad…
Now, the Democrats and their lackeys in the media are screaming “RACISM!”
The New York Times reported:
Hoping to hang on to a Congressional seat in a tight special election here on Tuesday, Republicans in this mostly white and very conservative district are trying to make the vote more a referendum on Senator Barack Obama than on the candidates themselves.
In advertisements and speeches, Republicans have repeatedly associated Travis Childers, the white Democrat threatening to take the seat away from the Republican Party, with Mr. Obama. Republicans say Mr. Obama’s liberal values are out of place in the district. But for many Democratic veterans here, the tactic is a throwback to the old and unwelcome politics of race, a standby in Mississippi campaigning.
Former Gov. William Winter, a Democrat, expressed shock at the current campaign.
“I am appalled that this blatant appeal to racial prejudice is still being employed,” said Mr. Winter, who lost the 1967 governor’s race after his segregationist opponent circulated handbills showing blacks listening to one of his speeches. Mr. Winter went on to win the governor’s office 12 years later.
MUCH MORE HERE…including the 411 on the flyer below being passed out by Democrats!
By Kathy Kiely and Jill Lawrence - LINKHillary Rodham Clinton vowed Wednesday to continue her quest for the Democratic nomination, arguing she would be the stronger nominee because she appeals to a wider coalition of voters — including whites who have not supported Barack Obama in recent contests.
“I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article “that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.”
“There’s a pattern emerging here,” she said.
Clinton’s blunt remarks about race came a day after primaries in Indiana and North Carolina dealt symbolic and mathematical blows to her White House ambitions. The Obama campaign, looking toward locking up the nomination, stepped up pressure on superdelegates who have the decisive votes in their race.
In both states, Clinton won six of 10 white voters, according to surveys of people as they left polling places.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton said that in Indiana, Obama split working-class voters with Clinton and won a higher percentage of white voters than in Ohio in March. He said Obama will be the strongest nominee because he appeals “to Americans from every background and all walks of life. These statements from Sen. Clinton are not true and frankly disappointing.”
Clinton rejected any idea that her emphasis on white voters could be interpreted as racially divisive. “These are the people you have to win if you’re a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that.”
Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, said Clinton’s comment was a “poorly worded” variation on the way analysts have been “slicing and dicing the vote in racial terms.”
However, he said her primary support doesn’t prove she’s more electable. Either Democrat will get “the vast majority” of the other’s primary election votes in a general election, he said.
Clinton lost North Carolina by 15 percentage points and won Indiana by 2 points after competing full-out in both states. She had loaned the campaign $6.4 million in the past month. She said she might lend more.
“We should finish the contests we have and see where we stand after they’re over,” she said, referring to the six remaining primaries that will end June 3.
There were signs of unrest Wednesday, even among Clinton allies. California Sen. Dianne Feinstein wondered to The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper, “whether she can get the delegates that she needs.” Former South Dakota senator George McGovern, whose 1972 presidential bid gave Clinton her first political experience, switched his support from Clinton to Obama.
“Do you know how difficult it is for women to stand up and say we are the best at anything? The Democratic Party has to know that women are the core, women have to be at the table and women are going to be heard as we continue in these contests until they finally end.”
– Hillary Rodham Clinton
She was speaking to a gathering of 1,500 at the “Generations of Women for Hillary” fundraiser at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington. The women gave her “a thunderous and extended standing ovation.” And why not? She is the women’s candidate. She represents us. She is opening doors for us. In the short span of her historic presidential campaign, Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken a lifetime of venomous misogyny and she has taken it for all of us. If she has not reawakened the long dormant feminist movement, no one can. If she wins, we win. If she loses, we lose:
“I’ve been counted out more than once. But thanks to all of you I’ve come back. When I was counted out in New Hampshire, it was the women of New Hampshire who came back and said, ‘No, she’s not finished yet.’ When I was counted out before Super Tuesday it was women from California to Massachusetts who came and said ‘No, we’re not finished yet.’ When I was counted out before Ohio, before Indiana, we have always come back.”And it’s not so much about my comeback it is about our comeback.
Donna Brazile is full of shit. She wants Obama and that’s that. She is working against Clinton. What makes me sad is when black women get that black male in charge they will find out just like white women have found out, that men, regardless of what race don’t give a damn about women. - Kitty Glendower
Kitty: You are insane. Your comment about black women and black men is out of bounds and offensive. - Angry Black Guy
Perhaps you should ask Kitty what color she is!!! - CarolynKB
ABG, you need to STFU! Calling a woman insane for having an opinion has been a misogynist trademark since the beginning of time. Study history moron. The black family has been split apart since slavery. (WTF!!) Black women have not had the opportunity en masse to live the dynamics of a patriarchal sanctioned husband/wife marriage. Not en masse. Look up the marriage rate for black men and black women. Black men are not marrying black women at the rate white men marry white women (or have been). Marriage has been sold as something favourable. Therefore many black women do transfer their struggles in life to not having a husband and imagine that life will be better with a husband. Black men are famous for attacking black women by accusing black women of not supporting black men. So it is a very strong possibility that black women are supporting Barack Obama somewhere in their subconscious to make amends to past accusations (the accusation of abandoning black men) and in a hope that if a black man is president other black men will follow by example. (WTF!!!) However, Obama is the wrong black man. He is an opportunist and he will lead by example exactly the way his community building has led in Southside Chicago. Which has been what? What exactly is the current murder count in Southside Chicago? What exactly is the current poverty level in Southside Chicago? What exactly is the unemployment rate for black men in Southside Chicago? That’s what I thought. Obama is a pipe dream. And I am sad for all the people who have placed all of their hopes and dreams into an empty suit. If he manages to swindle his way into the white house, we will just have four more years of George Bush. But yak all you want, I cannot bother with you, the racist accusations are getting old, especially when you don’t have a fucking clue who I am or what my life has been. Work with women trying to get their GEDs every day and then come back and tell me what many women’s hopes and dreams are and how promises have been made and broken by men hundreds and hundreds and thousands of times already. - Kitty Glendower
10) “I think with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, you can’t play, you know, hide the salami, or whatever it’s called.” –urging President Bush to make public Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers’s White House records
9) “You know, the Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people. They’re a pretty monolithic party. Pretty much, they all behave the same, and they all look the same. … It’s pretty much a white Christian party.” –speaking about the lack of outreach to minority communities by political parties
8) “I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks.”
7) “I’m a metrosexual.” –employing the buzz phrase for straight men who are in touch with their feminine sides, then later admitting he didn’t know what the term means
6) “We’ve gotten rid of (Saddam Hussein), and I suppose that’s a good thing.”
5) “The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong.”
4) “This president is not interested in being a good president.
He’s interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father.”
3) “Now that we’re on dog pee, we can have an interesting conversation about that. I do not recommend drinking urine…but if you drink water straight from the river, you have a greater chance of getting an infection than you do if you drink urine.” —teaching an eight-grade science class in La Crosse, Wisconsin
2) “You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever and get home and still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well Republicans, I guess can do that. Because a lot of them have never made an honest living in their lives.”
1) “Not only are we going to New Hampshire … we’re going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we’re going to California and Texas and New York! And we’re going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we’re going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaargh!” –Iowa concession speech
The reason why I reposted the white people won’t vote for black candidate article yesterday is to take y’all back to the beginning of Obama’s campaign and how the news media wanted to bully white folks into feeling guilty about their hidden racist views.Obama is in serious trouble; therefore the Democratic Party is in serious trouble.
Obama must be the Democratic Party nominee now. For all of Hillary’s bitching and moaning the party and the super delegates must reject her now. If Obama is not the nominee there will be a fucken war, revolt!So in the coming weeks, in fact TODAY, as this article below points out, the media will remind you white people that you are indeed racists. Every dollar going into the Hillary campaign are “racist” dollars. Obama is the only man that can unite the country, and anyone who conveys any other point of view will be seen as racist.
Soon I will post a short interview from MSNBC where the anchor chick is already laying out the ammo basically saying to RNC chair Mike Duncan “will you denounce future attacks on Obama using Rev Wright?” These attacks will be views by the media as racist!
Every fucken post or news article scrutinizing Obama will be seen as racist. More black pundits will be on the talk shows reminding Americans just how racist they are.
I must say today that I was wrong. I did say before Obama ran for president that white folks would never elect a black candidate for president.
I said this not knowing anything about Obama I was only going on skin color.
Oh Obama will not be president, he will lose, but not because of his color as I stated.
It will be because he is a shitty candidate and the more we learn about him we see that his flaws are as glaring as the sun.
However despite all of that, today, he is ahead of Hillary, and will win the nomination and that is a hell of an accomplishment.
Too bad the next few months the media in its zeal to prop up Obama will go all out on the race card, pointing the finger at evil, racist white America ignoring what he has accomplished by saying “Obama’s loss is America’s shame.”
The article below is just the beginning.
######
American Presidential elections have been compared with reality TV series or game shows, in which a gaggle of jumped-up nonentities aspiring to be celebrities are ritually humiliated in public and offered entertaining opportunities to self-destruct, until only one survivor remains. But this time round, a much more elevated analogy is sadly apposite.The 2008 US election has all the makings of a Greek tragedy, in which noble heroes and heroines are forced to follow a course to catastrophe, divinely preordained as punishment for sins and blunders committed by their forefathers in the dim and distant past. In acting out their ineluctable doom, the eloquent protagonists do not just destroy themselves but also their cities, their nations and even their entire civilisations.If this description sounds too grandiose, consider yesterday’s results from the Pennsylvania primary. The outcome seemed to be precisely calibrated by the gods to maximise the agony of the Democrats. It gave Hillary Clinton just the support she needed to stay firmly in contention, but not quite enough to turn the tide in her favour.
Worse still, this result underlined the fear that senior Democrats have long been aware of, but have never dared to express in public: America may not yet be ready to elect a black President. Worst of all, it has created conditions for the possible election victory of a militarily belligerent and economically unqualified Republican candidate who supports many of President Bush’s worst policies. Given the Bush Administration’s domestic and foreign failures, the disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan and, most recently, the slump in the economy, the possibility of a Republican victory in November would seem to overturn every principle of proper democracy - and also the hope of America and its system of government being rehabilitated in the eyes of the world after the Bush years. The fact that Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton are both such impressive candidates, intelligent, sincere, articulate and in command of the issues, while John McCain does not qualify on any of these criteria only makes matters worse.
That Mrs Clinton will now carry on with her campaign is not just probable but essential. For the voting in Pennsylvania confirms that she has a much better chance than Mr Obama of winning the White House for the Democrats. According to the Associated Press exit polls published yesterday, 16 per cent of white Democratic voters considered race an important factor in the Presidential election and 43 per cent of these said they would either vote Republican or not vote at all, if Mr Obama were the Democratic nominee.
Given that Mrs Clinton’s clear victory over Mr Obama in Pennsylvania followed similar results in other “must-win” states with large working-class constituencies, such as Ohio, Florida, New Jersey, Michigan and even New York and California, the conclusion would be fairly obvious, were it not for the political correctness makes it almost impossible for American politicians or commentators to express such a view: Mr Obama may by unable to carry large industrial states with socially conservative white working-class populations simply because of his race. This is especially true now that the televised rantings of Rev Jeremiah Wright and Mr Obama’s own gaffe about the “bitter” white working-class culture of “guns and God”, have reminded Americans that race is not just a matter of skin colour. Rev Wright embarrassingly revealed in his “God damn America” and “Chickens come home to roost” sermons that his African-American vision of America is be profoundly at odds with the white majority view.
The latest polls in the two most important swing states show Mr McCain easily beating Mr Obama in both Florida and Ohio, while Mrs Clinton comfortably beats the Republican in Ohio and is neck and neck in Florida.
Mr Obama has, of course, apologised for his condescension towards working-class church-goers and hunters - probably the most important group of floating voters in the electorally critical mid-Western states. He has tried even harder to dissociate himself from Rev Wright’s anti-American tirades, which really have to be seen (on YouTube) to be believed. And Mr Obama’s supporters have chastised Mrs Clinton for turning to “negative campaigning” and “scorched-earth” strategies in her desperation to stay in contention.
The trouble is that Mr Obama’s efforts to suppress the race issue are doomed to failure. For the influence of Rev Wright on him is a matter of public record. Indeed, the phrase “Audacity of Hope”, which is the title of Mr Obama’s political autobiography as well as his presidential leitmotif, is attributed in that book to a sermon by “my pastor, Rev Jeremiah Wright”. The Republican political machine, which demonstrated its mastery of the arts of character assassination in the two Bush presidential contests, will have no compunction in exploiting the Wright relationship and portraying Mr Obama as an anti-American in the general election, even if the Clinton campaign and the media observe a self-denying ordinance on the race and patriotism issues, as they broadly have so far.
The certainty of a no-holds-barred attacks by the Republicans brings us to the potentially most tragic aspect of this election. If ever there was an election the Democrats ought to win this is the one. Yet on the basis of the primary results so far, they are all too likely to lose it. Mr Obama may be marginally ahead of Mrs Clinton in the popular vote but the Democrats seem to have forgotten that all the votes cast so far have been by their own supporters. In the general election their candidate will have win over Republicans and right-leaning floating voters. Most of the evidence so far suggests that the Repulicans will find it much easier to frighten voters about the prospect of a President Obama than a President Clinton.
Professional Democratic politicians now have the casting vote in their party’s nomination and could yet force the two candidates into a “dream ticket” led by Mrs Clinton with Mr Obama as Vice President which would sweep all before it and would probable make Mr Obama unbeatable as a presidential candidate in 2012 or 2016. Yet the Democratic superdelegates who could now secure years of hegemony for their party seem to consider it “unfair” to use their professional judgment to overturn the “democratic” verdict of primary voters.
The Republicans will have no such compunctions about the fairness of launching personal attacks against a potentially vulnerable Democratic candidate. In this respect this Presidential contest may again manifest the tragedy of left-wing politics through the ages. Parties which care more about fairness than about power, end up achieving neither.
Plight Of The Black Conservatives: Negros must vote for Obama or else!
Monday, April 21st, 2008
This is a portion from the chronic Negro liberal Oliver Willis
“the vast majority of blacks engaged in politics are moving forward you have a miniscule few who for whatever the reason (I tend to think its for them to adopt a contrarian pose) will vote Republican. As a result, they are outliers within their own race and essentially position themselves against the tide of black history. The tried and true response of black conservatives is to look at themselves as some kind of hero or martyrs. The larger conservative movement, unable to attract a sizable percentage of black votes, trumpets these kinds of stories again and again. Like this blog post from the hard-right Human Events:
Blacks who will vote for McCain this fall are some of the most courageous people on the planet, because of the extreme social scorn they will face from their left-wing black counterparts.
It takes courage to challenge the dominant social order. It took courage for Elia Kazan to battle pro-Communist sentiment in the 1950s. It took courage for Martin Luther King to fight Jim Crow in the 1960s. It took courage for Ronald Reagan to confront institutionalized liberalism in the 1980s. Likewise, it will take courage for black Republicans like [Michael] Steele to combat “Obama-ism” in the late-2000s.
Of course, a black person supporting McCain is not courageous at all. If you want to truly compare it to the 1960s its the equivalent of seeing Bull Connor sic dogs on people and saying “Hey guys, let’s cool it on all this civil rights stuff, we may upset some people.”
This is another in the long line of clueless Negros who will stop at nothing at dissing Negros who exhibits any measure of independent thought.
Just for the record if asshole happens to read this, I am not planning on voting for McCain because he is a closet liberal sellout Republican weasel like a great many of current idiot fuck Republicans like the moron Governor of Indiana.
I do not vote for nor have I ever voted for “an individual” as much as I vote for principles, which is the primary reason why I will not waist my time voting for McCain in November.
I see him in the same mold as idiot fuck Newt pimping climate change bullshit with that liberal hack Nancy Pelosi. Newt is one of a growing crop if RINO’s who believes in compromising with idiot fuck liberals when I believe they should be doing the opposite.
As far as his post referring to anti-Obama Negros as “martyrs” and that fellow Negro conservative “prop up policies that hurt black America” is simply embarrassingly retarded and intellectually vacant.
As I have said many times on this blog, as a black man Obama’s ascension to the presidency is not high on my priority list nor will his presidency make me more of a man or a better black man. And just as any idiot liberal, Obama’s policies will no doubt keep way too many black folks, uneducated, unmotivated and impoverished. No amount of right wing Negro conservative bashing I hear from clueless Negros hacks will make me think otherwise.
This is why black folks are so fucked now because most are damm sheep and end up raising fucked up kids like the one in the “kill Bush” video below.
Instead of these stupid Niggas writing these fucken moronic posts castigating Negros who refuses to buy into Obama’s or any other Democrat bullshit try educating me on just how the Magic Negro plans to magically stop Niggas from killing each other, snorting child support payments up their noses, taking care of their kids and dropping out of school at an alarming rate. Then the ears may perk up.
Bill Clinton Flashback: “All These Economically Insecure White People…Are Scared To Death”
Monday, April 14th, 2008
Typical Democrats!
“The reason (George H. W. Bush’s tactic) works so well now is that you have all these economically insecure white people who are scared to death,” Clinton was quoted saying by the Los Angeles Times in September 1991.
A couple months later, Joe Klein, writing for the Sunday Times, reported that Clinton made the following remarks:
“You know, he [Bush] wants to divide us over race. I’m from the South. I understand this. This quota deal they’re gonna pull in the next election is the same old scam they’ve been pulling on us for decade after decade after decade. When their economic policies fail, when the country’s coming apart rather than coming together, what do they do? They find the most economically insecure white men and scare the living daylights out of them. They know if they can keep us looking at each other across a racial divide, if I can look at Bobby Rush and think, Bobby wants my job, my promotion, then neither of us can look at George Bush and say, ‘What happened to everybody’s job? What happened to everybody’s income? What … have … you … done … to … our … country?’”
A common theme of Clinton’s back then
Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton, trying to convince Alabama Democrats to support his presidential bid, accused Republicans of trying to woo white voters by preying on unfounded racial fears.
Clinton told a meeting of the Alabama Democratic Party black caucus that Republicans “find the most economically insecure white folks and go scare the living daylights out of them.” — AP, October 13, 1991
Why does the President refuse to let a civil rights bill pass? Because he knows that the people he is dependent on for his electoral majority — white working class men and women, mostly men, have had their incomes decline in the 1980s and they may return to their natural home, someone who offers them real economic opportunity. And so he is dredging up the same old tactic that the hard right has employed in my part of the country, in the South, since I was a child. When everything gets (hyped ?) and you think you’re going to lose those people, you find the most economically insecure white people and you scare the living daylights out of them. — Georgetown University, October 23, 1991
1,000 Illinois Democrats had gathered in Chicago for their annual fund-raising dinner. Clinton, 45, was determined to give them his best shot. And he did, vigorously attacking George Bush: ”You know, he wants to divide us over race. I’m from the South. I understand this,” Clinton croaked. ”This quota deal they’re gonna pull in the next election is the same old scam they’ve been pulling on us for decade after decade after decade. When their economic policies fail, when the country’s coming apart rather than coming together, what do they do? They find the most economically insecure white men and scare the living daylights out of them.” — Sunday Times, November 3, 1991
“If you were in the do-nothing faction and you were about to get voted out, you just found the most economically insecure white people and scared the living hell out of them. We were raised on his. . . What did it do for us? Nothing. Kept us down. Kept us flat. All the progress we’ve made in the South, we’ve made since we started working together again.” — Houston Chronicle, June 7, 1992
“Keep spinnin’, pal. You’re going to land right back into the gutter, with your bowling ball. Video of Obama’s response to Snob-gate is now posted on his YouTube channel:”
#########
This “Bittergate” controversy is one of the best examples of liberalism run amuck on the campaign trail.
It is so easy to process liberals. Not your old guard Democrats who voted for FDR types. I’m talking about the leaders, elected officials and people that work in Washington and these two assholes running for president on the Democratic side.
These fucks are no different than the typical European socialists’ assholes that look at the United States with disgust. They’re intellectual elitists. They think they are entitled to wealth and power because of their “superiority”.
These mutherfuckers believe in their soul that they should run the world.
They know better!
You… (or the bitter folks of Pennsylvania) are just a bunch of serfs that can’t manage your own lives.
As far as liberals are concerned they look at the United States as a mistake, an aberration. Socialism and communism is where it’s really at. It just hasn’t been given a fair shot.
This is what motivates folks like Obama.
Obama and liberal elitists think that average Americans are a bunch of uncivilized, dirty, embarrassing little people. We must be in charge to take care of you little slubs.
Obama was not just talking about folks in Pennsylvania; he was speaking to the folks in Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, and Mississippi, the heartland, the backbone of this nation.
You poor slobs have to be given everything.
The people of Pennsylvania are suffering because “we” the “Democrats”, are not reaching deep enough into the pockets of Americans to help make them feel better.
The Obama’s and the Hillary’s of the world don’t expect you to have the talent to do anything for yourself. Please vote for us. Let us set up a welfare system that will keep you poor for the rest of your life if you sign on to it. No need to be bitter, vote for me so I can take care of you!
That is this change shit he keeps ranting about.
######
Over the last five weeks, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has featured in her campaign stump speeches the story of a health care horror: an uninsured pregnant woman who lost her baby and died herself after being denied care by an Ohio hospital because she could not come up with a $100 fee.
The woman, Trina Bachtel, did die last August, two weeks after her baby boy was stillborn at O’Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio. But hospital administrators said Friday that Ms. Bachtel was under the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with the hospital, that she was never refused treatment and that she was, in fact, insured.
“We implore the Clinton campaign to immediately desist from repeating this story,” said Rick Castrop, chief executive officer of the O’Bleness Health System.
Linda M. Weiss, a spokeswoman for the not-for-profit hospital, said the Clinton campaign had never contacted the hospital to check the accuracy of the story, which Mrs. Clinton had first heard from a Meigs County, Ohio, sheriff’s deputy in late February.
A Clinton spokesman, Mo Elleithee, said candidates would frequently retell stories relayed to them, vetting them when possible. “In this case, we did try but were not able to fully vet it,” Mr. Elleithee said. “If the hospital claims it did not happen that way, we respect that.”
(link) Hip-hop star Snoop Dogg has launched a scathing attack on U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama, accusing him of gleaning support from the Ku Klux Klan.The rapper, real name Calvin Broadus Jr., insists the Democratic candidate has received funding from the KKK.
He tells the Guardian, “The KKK gave Obama money. They was (sic) one of his biggest supporters … Why wouldn’t they be? The media won’t tell you that. They don’t want you to know that. They just want you to know that this [bleep] befriended this other [bleep] who be (sic) threatening your values.
“But we all know all presidents lie to get into [bleep] office. That’s they (sic) job.”
But Snoop insists Obama will still emerge victorious in the upcoming presidential elections. He adds, “In America’s eyes, that mutha[bleep]’s gonna be president ‘cos (John) McCain can’t [bleep] with him. Hillary (Clinton) can’t [bleep] with him. He’s winning over white people, white ladies.”
“There may be many things that are marks on Obama.. but the claim that he is being supported by the KKK seems a bit out there and possibly only a position somebody totally wasted on drugs could come up with….”
Well not to knock good drugs, but the KKK supporting Obama is not a stretch. I have been questioning for a couple of years now why Obama back in the day would go campaign and raise money for Robert KKK Byrd. Hell if the KKK is sending dead presidents to Obama it’s the least they can do.
I have been bitching about this forever, despite overwhelming support from black folks for Obama, no black journalist, columnist, TV Pundit, somebody anybody ask him why he (Obama) would help raise money for a fucken racist!!
I bet still, today less than 1% of black folks who are supporting Obama know he campaigned for a former Klansman.
I don’t know if Snoop Dog knows it, but what’s that saying about politics and strange bedfellows…
This was from Moonbattery from 2005. In case you missed it!
Remember when the magic Negro went to West Virginia and pimped for Senator Robert “KKK” Byrd. Yes I know it’s an old story to us GOP types, but I thought it was a good time to recycle this old piece of 411.I was telling some friends about this and they did not believe me. I’m amazed at just how few people still don’t know about this, including Obama supporters.I know this is old, but just posting as a reminder since the media is continuing to prop up this articulate darkie. Just a reminder to Democrats as they push for change.
These folks are not sold on the Magic Negro; (Obama: No Cash From Denzel, Spike, Motown, Despite Oprah Backing) It tis going to be interesting the race gloves come off. Hillary is certain to start uttering code phrases in the coming weeks where she will basically say it tis not a good idea to elect someone with so little “experience,” she will add some code “can we take a chance of putting a “N-g-e-r at the top of the Democrat Party ticket?” But we will know what she really means. LOL!
Veteran racist Robert Byrd — the senile Senator who has spent his overlong career keeping blacks in “their place” by recruiting for the KKK, by filibustering the Civil Rights Act for 14 straight hours, by making a fool of himself by trying to block the nomination of the supremely qualified Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State, by participating in the “high-tech lynching” of Clarence Thomas as well as opposing the nomination of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court, by publicly calling people “niggers” as recently as 2001, by declaring that he would rather “die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels” — has a new advocate: Barack “Osama bin Osama” Obama, a fellow Senator and, as it happens, a “race mongrel.”Needless to say, any Republican with a resume like Byrd’s would be treated like a leper — especially by fellow Republicans. But the big D in “D-WV” deflects all sins from the Democratic Party’s point of view. There have been Democrats morally depraved enough to refer to Byrd as the “conscience of the Senate” without smirking. Obama is evidently shameless enough to go along with it.
Visit Ace of Spades HQ to read Obama’s letter to the true believers who make up MoveOn.org on behalf of the windy old ex-Kleagle’s reelection campaign. Obama lays it on pretty thick, crediting the bloviating obstructionist with upholding the highest of principles by using his favorite tactic — the filibuster — to circumvent the Constitution’s requirement that judges be approved by a simple majority. The original letter of course has a link where you can send money to buy Byrd a fresh set of sheets.
Meanwhile, for advocating a color-blind approach to justice, Clarence Thomas is often called an “Uncle Tom.” Colin Powell is characterized as a “plantation slave” for serving in a Republican Administration.
The Republican Party, as apparently too few people know, was founded largely on the issue of opposition to slavery — and has remained true to the principle of individual liberty regardless of race to this day. Last time I checked, there weren’t any ex-Kleagles on the Republican side of the aisle.
The punishment visited on Sen. Hillary Clinton for her flagrant, hysterical, repetitive, pathological lying about her visit to Bosnia should be much heavier than it has yet been and should be exacted for much more than just the lying itself. There are two kinds of deliberate and premeditated deceit, commonly known as suggestio falsi and suppressio veri. (Neither of them is covered by the additionally lying claim of having “misspoken.”) The first involves what seems to be most obvious in the present case: the putting forward of a bogus or misleading account of events. But the second, and often the more serious, means that the liar in question has also attempted to bury or to obscure something that actually is true. Let us examine how Sen. Clinton has managed to commit both of these offenses to veracity and decency and how in doing so she has rivaled, if not indeed surpassed, the disbarred and perjured hack who is her husband and tutor.I remember disembarking at the Sarajevo airport in the summer of 1992 after an agonizing flight on a U.N. relief plane that had had to “corkscrew” its downward approach in order to avoid Serbian flak and ground fire. As I hunched over to scuttle the distance to the terminal, a mortar shell fell as close to me as I ever want any mortar shell to fall. The vicious noise it made is with me still. And so is the shock I felt at seeing a civilized and multicultural European city bombarded round the clock by an ethno-religious militia under the command of fascistic barbarians. I didn’t like the Clinton candidacy even then, but I have to report that many Bosnians were enthused by Bill Clinton’s pledge, during that ghastly summer, to abandon the hypocritical and sordid neutrality of the George H.W. Bush/James Baker regime and to come to the defense of the victims of ethnic cleansing.
I am recalling these two things for a reason. First, and even though I admit that I did once later misidentify a building in Sarajevo from a set of photographs, I can tell you for an absolute certainty that it would be quite impossible to imagine that one had undergone that experience at the airport if one actually had not. Yet Sen. Clinton, given repeated chances to modify her absurd claim to have operated under fire while in the company of her then-16-year-old daughter and a USO entertainment troupe, kept up a stone-faced and self-loving insistence that, yes, she had exposed herself to sniper fire in the cause of gaining moral credit and, perhaps to be banked for the future, national-security “experience.” This must mean either a) that she lies without conscience or reflection; or b) that she is subject to fantasies of an illusory past; or c) both of the above. Any of the foregoing would constitute a disqualification for the presidency of the United States.
*****
Ya know unless Hillary is able to hire someone to assassinate Obama her chances of winning the presidency is pretty much zero.
Putting aside Rush’s “Operation Chaos” successfully fucking up the Democratic Party, after her sniper fire lie I have often thought about the mental acuity of people who still actually believe that Hillary Clinton should be president.
EVEN AFTER THIS MOTHER OF ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE LIES, how
could someone willingly show up at one of her campaign rallies and keep their integrity in check?
I have yet to find a blogger or columnist who is willing to bang out on a keyboard truthfully and honestly why Hillary, despite being a lying fuck should be president.
Only the fact that she is a woman and her name is Clinton. If she were a man named
Tom Richardson everyone including flaming lib tards would avoid her like the plague.
after reading this article, I’m just dumbfounded.
Observations of liar liar pants on fire fraud retard Democratic presidential candidates…
Thursday, March 27th, 2008
Obama’s Pastor Slurs Italians in Latest Magazine
By Penny Starr - CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
(CNSNews.com) - Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., pastor emeritus of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago where Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has been a member for two decades, slurred Italians in a piece published in the most recent issue of Trumpet Newsmagazine.
“(Jesus’) enemies had their opinion about Him,” Wright wrote in a eulogy of the late scholar Asa Hilliard in the November/December 2007 issue. “The Italians for the most part looked down their garlic noses at the Galileans.”
Wright continued, “From the circumstances surrounding Jesus’ birth (in a barn in a township that was under the Apartheid Roman government that said his daddy had to be in), up to and including the circumstances surrounding Jesus’ death on a cross, a Roman cross, public lynching Italian style. …
GREENSBORO, N.C. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Wednesday sought to quell concerns over anti-American remarks by his former pastor, saying people are paying too much attention to a small number of “stupid” comments.
Obama gave a sweeping speech on race last week in which he condemned incendiary remarks by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but the words of the former pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago continue to dog the candidate. Reflecting the campaign’s concern about the fallout, Obama used a question about religion at a town hall forum as an opportunity to address the issue.
“This is somebody that was preaching three sermons at least a week for 30 years and it got boiled down … into a half-minute sound clip and just played it over and over and over again, partly because it spoke to some of the racial divisions we have in this country,” Obama told an audience in this central North Carolina city.
“There are misunderstandings on both sides,” the Illinois senator said. “We cannot solve the problems of America if every time somebody somewhere does something stupid, that everybody gets up in arms and forgets about the war in Iraq and we forget about the economy.”
Obama is becoming Bill Clinton like. I mean in the “it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.
Remember:
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the–if he–if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not–that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement….Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”
So now we have a “small number of “stupid” comments” I guess it depends on what you would define as “small.”
Mrs. Clinton said that she says “millions of words each day” so “we were under sniper fire” so five small words out of a million, is indeed small. “God damm Americkkka” is just a blip on the radar.
Ya know I get the fact that politicians on both sides have some serious issues with honesty. And neither side has a monopoly on what may be the correct path to dealing with some of America’s issues but anybody paying attention has to be struck by just how incredibly deceitful and conniving Democratic politicians are.
A simple story about a foreign policy trip or whether or not (your church and pastor of CHOICE) is a raving racist America hating lunatic can produce the most bullshit rhetoric is just beyond belief.
One of my commenter’s Allen posted this and it describes Democrats perfectly;
“I can’t quite imagine what a conversation in that family must be like. The best I can figure:”
Neighbor: Your damn dog tore up my garden.
Bill: We have no dog. Hillary: Our dog was inside when the incident occurred. Chelsea: We have a dog?
Neighbor: Of course it’s your dog everyone knows it.
Lanny Davis: I find this focus on the dog to be irrelevant.
Hey Ferraro you are a stupid racist ass old white skank, unfortunately people like you are the biggest voting block
Wednesday, March 12th, 2008
Before you read my rant watch Keith Olbermann go off on Ferraro and Hillary. This is the first time I actually agreed with this dude on anything.
This race shit if the Democrats don’t fix it will doom the party. Now nothing would make me happier, BUT, although I am a conservative I still function with the mindset that for America to be a strong nation both sides of the political divide must field quality competent individuals and let the battle of ideas decide the direction of the country.
Although watching the Clinton campaign circle the drain with their racial mudslinging and identity politics is amusing it is not good for the nation.
Having this skank ass old white bitch Ferraro sounding off like David Duke is a further reminder of why my comments below are more correct than not.
***********
***********
I have to rant about this to remind myself why I named this blog Political Party Poop.
I read on some obscure blog by this dude trying to explain this racial mess the Democrats are in regarding the racial civil war between Hillary and Obama.
He states that we have three choices for president; a white dude, an aging white lady and a middle aged black dude and your choice basically lies with who you identify with the most.
Reading not only his statement but others basically babbling about the notion that we pick our political leaders simply based on physical characteristics is more than a little disturbing.
This particular dude is a Hillary supporter, but he does like Obama and he is trying to grasp (as is Geraldine Ferraro) how this relatively unknown black dude can be so close to the presidency. They wonder how did this Negro slip through the cracks of the Democratic Party machine.
Let me tell you why I find Ferraro’s comments over the top offensive.
First she used the same comment to describe the Jackson campaign years ago. Uppity ass white people - when trying to explain their racist tendencies towards black folks who manage to break through the racist haze - must somehow try to explain how that nigga was able to get that position, whether it is a political position, work or business related.
As Shelby Steele pointed out, all of us black folks must wear the survival masks to muck our way through society. Some of us are just better at playing the game then others.
I have been in countless situations where I have been the only black individual who was part of some major project, or chaired some committee or organization. And I have heard, via friends, that rednecks questioned my participation and my “standing.” They wanted to know what I brought to the table. Besides my blackness that is.
I mentioned in a post long ago that when I first got the job I now occupy, my predecessor who could not perform the job because he did not have the technical skills, asked me point blank when I met him, “what is your background, what are your qualifications for this position” before we even finished our handshake. I wanted to punch the mutherfucker.
What white person do you know, who has a job position, high paid or high profile, would be asked by someone “how’d the fuck did you get this gig?” I’m thinking “I don’t know, I FUCKEN APPLIED FOR THE POSITION.”
Unfortunately that would not be the last time individuals would take a double take when I told them my current job title.
Again it has nothing to do with anything other than perception. If I were a fucken delivery driver or some other common laborer, if I were sweeping the floors of my lovely facility nobody would blink and eye.
That is what this racist world expects of a black man.
Shit I work on a campus, your typical liberal bastion of educational endeavors and except for some black folks in such fields as African-American studies there are no black people around here. Hell there is only one black dude working in the entire campus maintenance department. Niggas can’t even get a job cutting the grass here. There are not even black folks working in the mess halls. I know we are a small percentage of the total population in Kansas, but I am convinced that there would be more blacks hired if the employers did not know our race before they made the decision.
I must say there is one black provost who is the head of campus technology. Must have been a quota hire. See, that is why people like Ferraro and her ilk assume that any black had help to get to a higher level.
Now keep in mind folks, my job don’t pay jack but I am responsible for the care for a high profile facility and they gave me the biggest fanciest office in the place, and perhaps in the whole town. When folks, particularly old white folks ask and when I tell them my job title more than a few people have asked me “how did you get this job?”
I have to wonder, would they ask that question if I were white? I don’t think so!
Shit if blacks are seen on college campuses white folks automatically think “affirmative action.” Same thing if we are in the corporate world. More than a few of us have endured the “quota” hire rant.
Every damn time black folks manage to achieve their little tiny piece of the pie, people like Ferraro, and especially old white people, need to attach the “well he or she must be a nigga quota hire or appointment.”
I have no plan to vote for Obama, because he is a closet Socialist and a flaming liberal. I don’t give a fuck what your color or background he is, if I find your particular brand of politics offensive I won’t vote for you and I damn sure can’t identify with you.
At Mrs. Snoops’ birthday dinner party the other night I was explaining to a friend, my still held belief that all of the Obama hype is fleeting, that white people when it comes time to vote will not pull the lever or tap the touch screen for a black dude particularly a black man.
Let me be even more specific, I seriously doubt that any Asian or relatively few Mexicans will vote for him, Mexicans don’t like black people, don’t get along with them. Most Mexicans would send black folks back to Africa faster than Robert Byrd.
That is why I have no problem voicing my disdain for illegal immigration. These Mexicans are not coming over here to become “American citizens.” They want their fucken country back and assimilating with the gringos, while stooping to mowing their lawns, making up hotel beds and building backyard decks for a few dollars an hour is just the ticket to keep the gringos at ease. Yea, I know, I’m stereo typing. I learned it from whitey!
I’m still not convinced, particularly with the heightened racial tensions that continue to boil over, that there is a significant enough number of white people who will put this nation in the hands of a black dude.
He needs 52 or 53 million people must win the majority of white men. He cannot win if no other racial or ethnic group is going to largely vote for a Negro.
Talks about racial identity! Scores of white people have little or no ongoing contact with black folks. Don’t work with any, don’t socialize with any, never dated a Negro, never went to grade school with one and more than likely never attend college with a Negro.
There are few if any positive black role models on TV and in the movies.
Sunday political talk shows are crammed with talking head old white people, all major radio broadcast talk shows on the right or left are by white folks.
Few influential black folks in the major news media and of course the majority of today’s decision makers are mostly white.
Still, today a white father’s worst nightmare is to have his lovely daughter marrying a Negro. That is still morally repugnant in the minds of way too many rednecks.
I’m black and my “Negro” friends all live on the east and west coasts. I can go days and not see another Negro in my humble little progressive (read liberal) town.
After all of that - you people want to still try and convince me that enough white people will say “fuck it” and hand the keys to the White House to a black dude? Oh I forgot to mention that a great number of white people are still trying to hand the Muslim tag around his neck.
“Gee won’t it be peachy keen to have a Negro as president?” Seriously folks I would need to smoke some really good weed to process that reality.
“But Snoop what about the primaries and the fact that he won white states like Vermont and Iowa” Look, I don’t discount Hillary hatred.
Obama is winning over the more educated and progressive white folks. The more education a given white person has the more likely they are to support Obama, because any rational thinking person would never consider Hillary, which is why she is most popular with lower middle class white folks particularly poor white women and old white women.
If on election night I am wrong I will have no problem admitting it.
Back to Obama. This black dude represents the hopes and dreams for black folks that somehow his presidency will transform niggas into more productive citizens when that is just a pipe dream. Yea. Right.
At the dinner party - and I have told Mrs. Snoop and others this many times - I said that nothing pisses me off more that to have someone tell me that Obama’s potential presidency will somehow transform me, I guess since I’m a black dude. On inauguration day somehow I will become a slightly better human being. I will suddenly be accepted for who I am without regard for my race. Fuck that. No magic negro is going to wave the magic wand and make the racists all think well of a black man!
Now I can see through the political crap and do often ridicule Obama’s ascendancy to the presidency, but when people like that fuck Ferraro feel that it is her obligation to remind the masses that your support of this unqualified Negro is “foolish” it is more than a bit insulting.
A nigger at the top of the Democratic ticket “that is just outrageous!”
It’s only because dude is black. Yup it tis funny that a great number of white people, mostly politically ignorant young people who see a vote for Obama as a vote against the man. Never mind that nobody reached the presidency has ever gotten there without dealing with “the man.” He will become “the man” and not much will really change!
Obama leading the Democrat presidential race was Howard Dean’s worst nightmare.
I would hope that black folks will continue to keep a close tab on the future racist statements that will come from the mouths of various Democrats. Hopefully black folks will finally start to comprehend that neither political party has a monopoly on your well being and by continuing to vote Democrat they give creative license to people like Ferraro.
When Ferraro was supposedly fighting for Negros as a politician, she saw herself as the slave master. All Democrats see black folks this way.
They are just simply tools to achieve political power. And how dare we not do things according to their master plan for us!?
They (the Ferraro’s of the world) never envisioned a time where some stray Negro would usurp their rightful place at the top of this countries political ivory towers.
Left-wing paternalists regard themselves as architects of racial progress, guarding and guiding blacks along the path of success — a role in which they assume to stand forever at the head of the march. But what happens when blacks overtake their enlightened white helpers? All hell breaks loose and the mask of progress drops to reveal the stricken faces of the white avant-garde .Geraldine Ferraro’s remarks confirm that beneath left-wing paternalism lurks considerable racism. “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” she said to the Daily Breeze. “He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”Since liberalism is not based upon natural justice but willfulness, it never fails to devour its supposed beneficiaries. Ferraro’s condescension captures the tone of paternalistic liberalism perfectly. Its “victims” should know their place and plot their ascent according to the progressive charts set up by the white liberal establishment.
We’ll let you know, Barack, when it is your time to win — that’s been the tacit theme of the Clinton campaign all along. Such is the generosity of Lady Bountiful she’ll even let him serve as her apprentice in the VP chair for eight years.
But chaos has erupted and the plantation progressives don’t know what to do,except to blurt out pent-up racial resentments. Then, the victims, whom they spent the last few decades training in hair-trigger racial sensitivity, turn on them in righteous fury, detecting nuances of racism in everything from Andrew Cuomo’s description of Obama’s press conferences as “shuck and jive” events to Bill Clinton’s belittling Jesse Jackson comparison to Ferraro’s sniffing at his “luck.”
IF, AS FERRARO SAYS, the country is “caught up in the concept” of embracing an unqualified black president, that’s because she and her friends propagandized Americans in that notion a long time ago. Ferraro’s whining is the grousing of a propagandist whose student has surpassed her.
Heard At Hillary Ohio Rally: “Obama Lies About Being Muslim”
Wednesday, March 5th, 2008
“The truth is he was born a Muslim, his father was a Muslim, his mother married a Muslim after divorcing his father. His grandfather was a Muslim. It doesn’t matter. But it does matter when Obama says he was never a Muslim. That matters because he lied… He lies when he says he was never a Muslim. He was a Muslim. He was born a Muslim. He was a Muslim for six years of his life.”
Hillary supporter Todd Elbaum Ohio Rally For Hillary Clinton
