VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY HILLARY COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for the ‘Crap Politics’ Category

Obama eyes active role in oil markets

Friday, March 21st, 2008



maxinebullshit1.PNG

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama would take an active role in U.S. oil markets as president, tackling concerns about the dominance of large oil companies and eyeing the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a potential weapon to combat high prices, his top energy adviser said.

Jason Grumet, the presidential hopeful’s key energy and environmental policy aide, told Reuters this week that an Obama administration would crack down on any competition lapses in the sector that have resulted from big corporate mergers.

Grumet also said Obama would seek to link a future U.S. carbon emissions trading system with the European Union’s scheme as soon as possible while focusing attention on China and India in forging a global warming pact…

More at Sweetness & Light

Sphere: Related Content

Pastor inspires Obama’s ‘audacity’

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

obama6a1.jpg

When he took over Trinity United Church of Christ in 1972, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. was a maverick pastor with a wardrobe of dashikis and a militant message.Six years later, he planted a “Free South Africa” sign on the lawn of his church and asked other local religious leaders to follow his lead.

None took him up on the invitation.

The sign stayed until the end of apartheid, –long enough to catch the eye of a young Barack Obama, who visited the church in 1985 as a community activist. Obama, was not a churchgoer at the time, but he found himself returning to the sanctuary of Trinity United. In Wright he had found both a spiritual mentor and a role model.

Wright, 65, is a straight-talking pragmatist who arrived in Chicago as an outsider and became an institution. He has built a congregation of 8,500, including the likes of Oprah Winfrey and hip-hop artist Common, by offering an alternative to socially conservative black churches that are, Wright believes, too closely tied to Chicago’s political dynasties.

Obama, too, also came to the city as a young unknown. Emerging from relative obscurity with his win in the Democratic U.S. Senate primary race for a U.S. Senate seat, he found a growing audience by preaching the politics of social justice and common ground. He has encouraged Democrats to acknowledge the power of faith in the lives of Americans. Now, he is positioning himself as a presidential candidate who can unify the American people.

Obama says that rather than advising him on strategy, Wright helps keep his priorities straight and his moral compass calibrated.“What I value most about Pastor Wright is not his day-to-day political advice,” Obama said. “He’s much more of a sounding board for me to make sure that I am speaking as truthfully about what I believe as possible and that I’m not losing myself in some of the hype and hoopla and stress that’s involved in national politics.”READ THE REST HERE

Obama: I never heard my pastor’s trash talk

Sphere: Related Content

Obama’s Memory Faulters On Rezko Cash

Monday, March 10th, 2008



rezko1.jpg

Following up on an Instapundit link to Ace here: The Rezko-Obama Payoff: The Property - I came across some other troubling quotes from Obama on Rezko.From the Sun Times, Nov, 2006:

Q: How many fundraisers has Mr. Rezko hosted for you? Were these all in his home? How much would you estimate he has raised for your campaigns?

A: He hosted one event at his home in 2003 for my U.S. Senate campaign. He participated as a member of a host committee for several other events. My best estimate was that he raised somewhere between $50,000 and $60,000.

But it turns out that number isn’t even close, and it’s now being reported as upwards of 200k….

READ IT ALL ON  - Riehl World View

 

Other stuff: Obama and Rezko: TPM’s Timeline

IN CASE YOU DID NOT KNOW….

Obama and Rezko

Brian Ross on Obama and Tony Rezko

Sphere: Related Content

Kos Kid: Women Have It Great Under Islam!

Monday, March 10th, 2008

Found via Ace of Spades


“Barbaric illiberal tyrannies are supplied with endless apologism because their hearts are in the right place (i.e., they are at war, hot or cold, with America).And America of course is castigated for every flaw, real or imagined.

But don’t question their patriotism. This particular chappie seems to think women have it better in Pakistan than in Pawtucket, but do not question his passionate love affair with the United States”.


************

Before 9/11/01, the media relegated stories about women in Islamic societies to page B27, below the fold. Ever since 9/12/01, those same stories have screamed from the front pages in 100-point type. The shift in discourse coincided with the launch of Bush’s global “War on Terror,” when various hawks began using the plight of women in Islam to illustrate the supposed perfidy of our “enemies,” and to justify a series of military “interventions” — invasions — by Western powers.

In the United States, there’s now an almost universally held belief that most women in Islamic societies face wretched persecution and that Islam itself is wholly to blame. But there’s scant empirical evidence to support the claim — mostly, we’re treated to detailed reports of horrific abuses in theocratic states like Saudi Arabia and Iran, despite the fact that just six percent of the Muslim world live in those two countries. If you ask average Americans how they came to their beliefs about how badly women suffer in Islamic societies, most will reply that “everyone knows it.”

But I’ve seen no empirical data to suggest that an Islamic majority itself correlates with the subordination of women better than other co-variables like economic development, women’s ability to serve in government, a political culture that values the rule of law or access to higher education. In other words, you can use a comparison of women’s status in Saudi Arabia and Sweden to make an intellectually weak argument for Western superiority, but there’s little support for the notion that women living in “traditional” Islamic cultures enjoy a lower social status than those in orthodox Christian, Jewish or Hindu communities, to name a few examples.

Read more of this here on Kos

Oppression, Mutilation, Murder of Women under Islam

Wife Beating in Islam - Only a rod will help!

Iranian Police Enforces “Islamic Dress Code” on Women

This is all propaganda, lies lies!!!

Sphere: Related Content

Ok……….

Friday, March 7th, 2008

Mayor of New Orleans: “I Am A Vagina-Friendly Mayor”

nigga_please.jpg

Liberal analysis : “How Dumb Can Republicans Get?”

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Here is a portion of a piece found on the liberal blog Firedoglake, that I found amusing.
It was a response to We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get? - By Charlotte Allen in the WaPo
Typical liberal stereotypical evil right wing trash fest.

In case you forgot this is the blog that produced this photo:


blackface3.jpg

I am certainly not the only Republican flummoxed by this openly homoerotic hero worship by my fellow Republicans. An acquaintance plans to write a screenplay called “The Golf Course,” in which four Republican men drive around in an electric cart and salaciously fondle their five irons while discussing how to most effectively screw minorities out of their right to vote.

babyche.jpgWhat is it about us Republicans? Why do we always fall for the hyperbole, the ill-conceived ideas, the bulging flightsuit crotches? Just look at what’s #1 on the hardcover nonfiction best seller list of the New York Times: “Liberal Fascism,” by Jonah Goldberg, a paean to half-cocked research, terrible sentence structure, and a shocking paucity of logic! Why must Goldberg perpetuate the stereotype that Republicans are incapable of producing the facts to support our arguments? There’s also Glenn Beck, at #7, reinforcing the notion that Republicans are too dumb to understand evolutionary theory, and Newt Gingrich, weighing in at #8, reminding us that he is the human canker sore on the upper lip of Republican family values.

Television serves us no better. The Sunday morning news programs give Republicans plenty of air time to put our stupidity on display. We can publicly humiliate ourselves by salivating over John McCain with George Stephanopoulos. Tim Russert’s our go-to man when we want to shred a certain female Democratic presidential candidate. Create an echo chamber from the latest White House blast fax? Give Cokie Roberts a call; she’s quite the gifted parrot.

As sad as it may be, several of the alleged myths about 21st-century Republicanism have been proven true. We really do fetishize war and want to drown Medicare and Social Security in a bathtub. The size of our automobiles is inversely proportionate to our “manly characteristic.”

Moreover, a study published by Regent University revealed that Republican men are statistically more prone to closeted gay sex than Democratic men. (The only good news was that closeted Republican men tended to be single, so the revelations of their sex lives didn’t destroy entire families with twelve or more children.) And then there was that study that showed that protest121.jpgliberals are more adaptable than conservatives. Surely, the theory that Republicans are the dumber party is amply supported by the candidates they put forward for President.

READ THE FULL ENTRY HERE

I know I’m a bit nuts for occasionally reading retarded liberal shit like this, I’m hardly insulted by it I’m more amused when I read stuff like this.
I am keenly aware that there are a great many leftists who truly think like this retarded bastard.

I’m a conservative dude, always have been always will be, I grew up in the Bay Area in the 1970 and was around some of the most retarded mentally handicapped liberal nuts on the planet. My conservatism is a direct result of growing up and seeing and listening to the craziness of liberal nuts first hand. Not by reading any specific books, listening to talk radio, or absorbing speeches by old right wing icons, or being indoctrinated by some conservative guru I heard on the radio or watched on TV. My disdain for liberalism stems from direct observation of these socially retarded minions.

When I read entries like this I wonder, do individuals who write this 10.jpgkind of bullshit do so with a straight face?

I understand that there is this never ending battle of ideas and we all are part of it. Despite the calls for civility, I love these battles and believe that these political battles are necessary. Yes they can be nasty and bloody but the idea that “civil” political discourse is somehow possible is grossly naïve.

Both sides routinely borrow from the most extreme examples of social and political ignorance and intellectual vacancy exhibited by folks on the right and the left everyday.

In this piece this individual points out how those of us on the right don’t use facts to support our arguments, but it tis they who routinely gives us shining examples of liberal brilliance and logic everyday. Below are some examples of a few things, shit if I were to lay out every example of liberal nonsense this post would go on forever.
From global warming alarmism, to eco terrorism, race baiting politics, anti-American, socialist propaganda nonsense and the list goes on and on. And somehow this individual says that we on the right are the stupid ones. Seriously are these people really that blind to their own intellectual dishonesty?


codepinkfatlady.jpg


azrepubliceffigy.jpg


oly1.jpg

Sphere: Related Content

Weather Channel Founder Blasts Network; Claims It Is ‘Telling Us What to Think’

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

TWC founder and global warming skeptic advocates suing Al Gore to expose ‘the fraud of global warming.’

The Weather Channel has lost its way, according to John Coleman, who founded the channel in 1982.

Coleman told an audience at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on March 3 in New York that he is highly critical of global warming alarmism.

“The Weather Channel had great promise, and that’s all gone now because they’ve made every mistake in the book on what they’ve done and how they’ve done it and it’s very sad,” Coleman said. “It’s now for sale and there’s a new owner of The Weather Channel will be announced – several billion dollars having changed hands in the near future. Let’s hope the new owners can recapture the vision and stop reporting the traffic, telling us what to think and start giving us useful weather information.”

The Weather Channel has been an outlet for global warming alarmism. In December 2006, The Weather Channel’s Heidi Cullen argued on her blog that weathercasters who had doubts about human influence on global warming should be punished with decertification by the American Meteorological Society.

Coleman also told the audience his strategy for exposing what he called “the fraud of global warming.” He advocated suing those who sell carbon credits, which would force global warming alarmists to give a more honest account of the policies they propose.

“[I] have a feeling this is the opening,” Coleman said. “If the lawyers will take the case – sue the people who sell carbon credits. That includes Al Gore. That lawsuit would get so much publicity, so much media attention. And as the experts went to the media stand to testify, I feel like that could become the vehicle to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming.”

More of this article and the video of his comments here

Here is Coleman on Glenn Beck,

(I said it)

I’m far from being an expert and I can nor will I ever claim to be a person who is completely versed on the scientific analysis concerning global warming, but I do know this: Global Warming is likely the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the world population.

My God I have read so many liberal blogs, and these idiot TV pundits who try to explain all of this global warming bullshit as if somehow they have been granted exclusive 411 (information) handed down by Jesus Christ himself.

Anybody who can’t see the great money making scam in perpetuating this global warming terrorist scare is simply a fool.

If I would have been smart enough to go into any science field, studying climatology or whatever field you need to go into to scam university or research grant monies, I would be screaming about global warming too.
Then you add that idiot socialist Hillary wanting to steal money from the oil companies and add it to Gubment pockets and you global warming folks can’t see what is happening?

No seriously, are you people playing stupid or is that Ferengi bartender slipping a Mickey in your morning coffee on a daily basis?

Old stuff:
Carbon Credit Fraud

GE Cashing in on Global Warming Hoax

Media Ignore Al Gore’s Financial Ties to Global Warming

Sphere: Related Content

Future liberal Media Headline…Rush Limbaugh says Obama looks like Curious George…

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

A caller said that Obama looked like Curious George and Limbaugh laughed. Limbaugh says he had no idea who Curious George was.

Look for this to be on every liberal blog and on the Drudge Report soon.


cg5.jpg
UPDATE
Predictable Liberals ABC Blog: Limbaugh Caller Says Obama Reminds Daughter of Cartoon Monkey

ABC News’ Tahman Bradley Reports: Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh issued an on-air apology to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., today after a caller said her daughter thought the Democratic presidential frontrunner looked like the cartoon character Curious George, a monkey.

Limbaugh, who laughed at the caller’s comments, later apologized explaining he didn’t know anything about Curious George.

There has been much discussion about whether the media is more aggressive with Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and a bit more polite and careful in dealing with Obama, which is what Limbaugh was alluding to today. But forty years removed from racist archetypes like Blackface, Limbaugh probably won’t get much sympathy by laughing at a child thinking a black man favors a monkey.

From Newsbusters: ABC Blogger Makes Rush Limbaugh Out A Racist Over Caller’s Comments - So, how is a Rush Limbaugh caller’s comments News?

God this is funny, Reason #9,456,112 why I think liberalism is a mental disease, LOL!

Oops found another lib tard…. (link)

Update: Ironically, after lambasting the RNC for being too easy on Obama, Limbaugh found it necessary to issue an on-air apology to the Senator:

“I’ve got to do something here to open this hour of today’s excursion into broadcast excellence. I need to apologize to both Sen. Obama and to Sen. McCain, ” said Limbaugh. “I had never heard of Curious George. Only now have staffers sent me little pictures of Curious George,” he continued.
“So I wish to apologize to both Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain. It was not my intent to bring dishonor and guttural utterances into this campaign. It happened. I laughed about it. It was a 12 year old kid’s reaction to Obama, it was told by his mother. I was laughing because I was being polite, but I had never heard of Curious George.”

In this instance, I have to commend Limbaugh for doing the right thing, but also feel compelled to point out that Rush might have known a little bit more about Curious George if he didn’t spend so much time carrying water for Incurious George.

Another lib tard….
Bored I-5 Radio Listening Confirms: Rush Limbaugh a Complete Tool


Things eventually turned ridiculous, though. A caller, discussing how Clinton and Obama are both terrifying or whatever, made the comment that “my 12-year-old says that Obama looks like Curious George!” As my jaw hit the steering wheel, Rush chuckled and they moved on to the next topic. Upon coming back from a commercial break, however, Rush made an announcement: he apologizes, he didn’t know who Curious George was, let alone the fact that he is a monkey, and to drive home the point proceeded to spend about 30 minutes denying any knowledge of pop culture in general, professing ignorance, in turn, of Snoopy, The Simpsons, and “cartoon monkeys” of any sort. He apologized multiple times to Obama and, inexplicably, to McCain, but it was all just so sad that I started to feel kind of ill, and I finally put on “104.1 It Just Rocks” until I neared the Bay Area and a staticky public radio signal, although they were broadcasting “Talk of the Nation,” which really isn’t that much better. But my trip through the valley of the shadow of death did at least confirm that while Limbaugh may have brief moments of internal logical consistency, eventually he’ll indict himself with hypocrisy so pathetic you’re willing to listen to Nickelback instead.



obama_george.jpg


Sphere: Related Content

Race Man

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

obama-and-clinton-31564-1.jpgby Sean Wilentz - The New Republic

How Barack Obama played the race card and blamed Hillary Clinton.


After several weeks of swooning, news reports are finally being filed about the gap between Senator Barack Obama’s promises of a pure, soul-cleansing “new” politics and the calculated, deeply dishonest conduct of his actually-existing campaign. But it remains to be seen whether the latest ploy by the Obama camp–over allegations about the circulation of a photograph of Obama in ceremonial Somali dress–will be exposed by the press as the manipulative illusion that it is.

Most of the recent correctives have concerned outrageously deceptive advertisements approved and released by Obama’s campaign. First, in Iowa, the Obama camp aired radio ads patterned on the notorious “Harry and Louise” Republican propaganda from 1993, charging falsely that Senator Hillary Clinton’s health care proposal would “force those who cannot afford health insurance to buy it, punishing those who won’t fall in line.” In subsequent primary and caucus campaigns, the Obama campaign sent out millions of mailers, also featuring the “Harry and Louise” motif, falsely claiming that Clinton favored “punishing families who can’t afford health care in the first place.” A few bloggers and columnists, notably Paul Krugman in The New York Times, described the ads as distorting, but the national press corps mainly ignored them–until Clinton herself, seeing the fraudulent mailers reappear in Ohio over the past weekend, publicly denounced them.

The Obama mass mailings also attempt to appeal to Ohio’s labor vote by claiming that Clinton believed that the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed in 1993 by President Bill Clinton, was a “‘boon’ to our economy.” More falsehood: In fact, Clinton had not said that; Newsday originally applied the word “boon” and has now noted the Obama campaign’s distortion. In this campaign, Clinton has called for a moratorium on all trade agreements until they are made consistent with labor and environmental standards–and account for the effect on jobs in the United States. Obama makes a big deal about how Bill Clinton signed NAFTA. But he fails to mention that, within the councils of her husband’s administration, Hillary Clinton was a skeptic of free trade agreements, and as a senator and candidate she has said that NAFTA contained flaws that need to be rectified. Ignoring all that, the Obama flyer features an alarming photograph of closed plant gates, having no connection to any action of Senator Clinton’s, as well as the dubious quotation about her from Newsday in 2006. Newsday has criticized “Obama’s use of the quotation” as “misleading … an example of the kind of slim reeds campaigns use to try and win an office.” Obama, without retracting the mailing (and while playing to protectionist sentiment in the party) said only that he would have his staff look into the matter–long after the ad has done its dirty work.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

Sphere: Related Content

‘I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama….psych just kidding! UPDATE

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

larrysinclairfailed.jpgFrom the Cleveland Leader via Conservative Grapevine

The Minnesota man who claims to have had sex with and taken cocaine with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama voluntarily participated in a series of polygraph tests over the weekend.

Whitehouse.com initially offered Larry Sinclair $10,000 to take a polygraph test, and $100,000 if he passed it and was shown to be telling the truth.Whitehouse.com acquired the services of two expert polygraph examiners, who have examined Mr. Sinclair. The results of the first polygraph examination by Dr. Ed Gelb (Former President of the American Polygraph Association) indicate “deception” in regards to both the drug and sex claims by Sinclair.

The second expert’s conclusions have not yet been revealed, but should be early this week. These will either confirm or deny the first examiner’s results. Whitehouse.com has additionally promised to post video recordings of the examinations for complete disclosure and transparency.

MORE HERE

********************************************************************
Sinclair, who describes himself as “gay,” claims he “personally engaged in
 sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999″ with Obama
larrysinclair.jpg
Minnesota man takes his case to court, YouTube, $100,000 polygraph challenge..This is from World Net Daily, no shit, not from the National Enquirer.Now I know this is small by comparison, and more tabloid in scope, but as the Obama magic seemingly propels him closer to the Oval Office there will be more crazy shit said about him and more weirdness will manifest itself.Between the crazy shit the Clinton’s will unveil, the ever present racial strife that still plagues this country closet racists will stop at nothing to torpedo this man becoming president.
Hell the media is already circulating crazy shit like assassination plots against the dude.No amount of youthful exuberance will be able to overcome the painful reality of racist strife in this country and Obama will be the main target

WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama’s staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance – thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.

“My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest,” Sinclair told WND by telephone. “I didn’t want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999.”

MORE HERE

Sphere: Related Content

Obama worked with terrorist… and other shady folks

Monday, February 25th, 2008

Senator helped fund organization that rejects ‘racist’ Israel’s existence


ayers.jpg

JERUSALEM – The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a “catastrophe” and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi’s wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.

Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund’s website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2001.

Obama served on the Wood’s Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.

Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama’s senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s. He is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Read the rest here at WND found via Conservative Grapevine

More reading: Obama’s ‘Weatherman’ Connection - WaPo

“William Ayers, in the age of terrorism, will be Barack Obama’s Willie Horton.”
–Former counterterrorism official Larry C. Johnson,

The Huffington Post, Feb. 16, 2008.


(Here is the last portion of the article)  There is a flickering presidential campaign analogy from the 1970s while you, Mr. McCain, were detained in Hanoi — while Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn were setting bombs, Mr. Rashidi was in the Mideast with the PLO, Mr. Auchi was in Baghdad with Saddam Hussein and Mr. Obama was eleven years old in Hawaii. In March and April 1972, Democratic primary voters elbowed aside Chicago Mayor Richard Daley’s favorite, Ed Muskie of Maine, in order to nominate for the presidency the self-described “people’s president,” George McGovern of South Dakota. The Daley team telephoned Rowland Evans and Robert Novak to complain, “anybody but McGovern.” The prescient quote from the Daley partisan: “I think the nomination of George McGovern would mean the end of the Democratic Party we have known.”

Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern, forty-nine states to one. Will the four horsemen of Mr. Obama’s November, Rezko, Ayers, Rashidi and Auchi, lead to a similar defeat for the spectacular candidacy of Barack Obama?

There is more:

Man all kinds of crazy stuff, I even found this site: Rezko Watch -

“Rezko Watch will follow the adventures — and misadventures — of indicted Chicago political friendster-fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko and his relationship with Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).”

Sphere: Related Content

Help spread the word: Obama has substance! LOL!!!!

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

Judge Him by His Laws - Charlie Peters

Consider a bill into which Obama clearly put his heart and soul. The problem he wanted to address was that too many confessions, rather than being voluntary, were coerced — by beating the daylights out of the accused.Obama proposed requiring that interrogations and confessions be videotaped.This seemed likely to stop the beatings, but the bill itself aroused immediate opposition. There were Republicans who were automatically tough on crime and Democrats who feared being thought soft on crime. There were death penalty abolitionists, some of whom worried that Obama’s bill, by preventing the execution of innocents, would deprive them of their best argument. Vigorous opposition came from the police, too many of whom had become accustomed to using muscle to “solve” crimes. And the incoming governor, Rod Blagojevich, announced that he was against it.

***********
Remember the dude on Chris Matthews….


Well, after the fact, Watson actually tried to come up with a list of Obama’s “accomplishments” after the fact. So, imagine it: Watson is highly motivated because he has made his candidate look bad on TV, so he does heavy research, he talks to his fellow Obama supporters, and he probably even called Obama’s campaign.

(Right Wing News - Obama’s “Accomplishments“)

 after the fact, Watson actually tried to come up with a list of Obama’s “accomplishments” after the fact. So, imagine it: Watson is highly motivated because he has made his candidate look bad on TV, so he does heavy research, he talks to his fellow Obama supporters, and he probably even called Obama’s campaign.  So, what did Watson manage to come up with? This is it


* Senator Obama’s fight for universal children’s health care in Illinois.* His success bringing Republicans and Democrats together (a huge selling point for me in general) on bills such as the one in Illinois requiring police interrogations and confessions to be videotaped.* His leadership on ethics reform in Washington (the bill that lobbyists and special interests are complaining about right now has his name on it).

* His bill to make the federal budget far more transparent and accessible to Americans via the Internet – we could use that openness in Texas.

* And his vital work with Republicans to lock down nuclear weapons around the world.


No wait, Jack and Jill Politics blog unhappy with us conservative leaning folks trashing their man has a bunch of stuff.

OBAMA HAS SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATIVE ACHIEVEMENTS both in the Illinois and US Senate.You should be able to discuss his groundbreaking work to reform the Illinois death penalty by getting confessions videotaped against the objections of a Republican governor plus police and prosecutors.

You should be able to discuss his groundbreaking work to create an easily searchable database of federal spending, the Google for Government, bill.

You should be able to discuss his nuclear non-proliferation law co-sponsored with Republican Dick Lugar.

That’s all Watson had to know. But wait, there’s more. So. Much. More.

He says:

“you need to visit barackobama.com NOW. Seriously. It is your duty as a citizen to be informed and no one is preventing you. Go to the issues page. Click on any issue (e.g. Civil Rights). This may sound hard, but I want you to read it. Jump to the bottom where it says “Barack Obama’s Record” and you’ll see” for example:

Record of Advocacy: Obama has worked to promote civil rights and fairness in the criminal justice system throughout his career. As a community organizer, Obama helped 150,000 African Americans register to vote. As a civil rights lawyer, Obama litigated employment discrimination, housing discrimination, and voting rights cases. As a State Senator, Obama passed one of the country’s first racial profiling laws and helped reform a broken death penalty system. And in the U.S. Senate, Obama has been a leading advocate for protecting the right to vote, helping to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act and leading the opposition against discriminatory barriers to voting.

Media Matters also has:

In a February 12 article in The Politico on Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) “peevish” comments “accus[ing] the media of ignoring his substantive record and falsely depicting him as a lightweight,” senior political writer Ben Smith claimed that Obama “hasn’t sponsored any legislation that would affect the way Americans live their daily lives.” Yet, as Media Matters for America has noted, Obama was the primary sponsor of 152 bills and resolutions introduced in the last Congress. These included bills to create a federal standard for renewable diesel fuel (S.1426), to improve benefits and services for members of the armed forces and veterans (S.3988), and to direct the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to establish guidelines for tracking spent fuel rods (S.1194).

more at the above link… BUT BUT BUT Media Matters end the piece by informing you of the following:



Smith did not note that between the time Obama took office and January 4, the Republican Party was the majority party in the Senate and thus controlled the legislative agenda. In such a situation, the oportunities for a bill sponsored by a member of the minority party to see legislative action are particularly limited.

Lets be fair, people!

OK believe it or not people I check out a great number of these links, so who else on the left is trying to pimp for B Hussein Obama?   

Finally from Gov Track - Barack Obama Voting History

Statistic: Barack Obama missed 185 of 1098 votes (17%) since Jan 6, 2005 (Extremely Poor relative to peers).

Bill Sponsorship & Cosponsorship

Statistics: Barack Obama has sponsored 129 bills since Jan 4, 2005, of which 120 haven’t made it out of committee (Poor) and 1 were successfully enacted (Average, relative to peers). Obama has co-sponsored 545 bills during the same time period (Average, relative to peers).

Some of Obama’s most recently sponsored bills include… (View All)

S. 2030: A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require reporting relating to bundled contributions made by persons other than registered lobbyists.

S. 2111: Positive Behavior for Effective Schools Act

S. 2066: Back to School: Improving Standards for Nutrition and Physical Education in Schools Act of 2007

S.Con.Res. 46: A concurrent resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Sickle Cell Disease Awareness Month.

S. 2044: Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007

I have now properly educated myself on Obama’s “greatness.” Wow I bet you Obama supporters must be beaming and just oozing at the possibility of electing the next MLK? Kennedy? Carter? LOL!

Chris Matthews did the Obama people a huge favor, all of these tards were going around gushing about Obama’s speaking eloquence and his bullshit message of change and hope.
Matthews embarrassing that moron from Texas put the Obama fans on notice.

I doubt it, bloggers tend to be far more educated about political issues and the true substance of candidates, but the average person on the streets will always be more smitten by a politicians, looks, charm/charisma, speech giving ability, bottom line a bunch of bullshit.

Wizbang Blue had these clips from that dude who does the focus group thing on Fox and asked these clueless people if they could name any Obama accomplishment. Well without watching the video, you already know the answer.
I was particularly amused at one dudes response:

and

Sphere: Related Content

Obama and his lobbyists homies

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

FIRST HIS WORDS….

From Sister Toldjah -  Barack Obama’s ties to lobbyists and special interests

“I think it is imperative that the whole truth and nothing but the truth gets out about the man who could be our next president. He’s not being completely upfront with the American people, and we all know his devotees in the press will faithfully continue to carry his water, so it’s up to “citizen journalists” to help spread the word.The Washington Post fact check article I linked to noted a few examples, but here are some more:  On August 9, 2007, The Boston Globe reported on Barack Obama’s meteoric rise in politics, and just what types of groups helped make that possible: PACS and lobbyists (emphasis added by me):

A Globe review of Obama’s campaign finance records shows that he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from lobbyists and PACs as a state legislator in Illinois, a US senator, and a presidential aspirant.In Obama’s eight years in the Illinois Senate, from 1996 to 2004, almost two-thirds of the money he raised for his campaigns — $296,000 of $461,000 — came from PACs, corporate contributions, or unions, according to Illinois Board of Elections records. He tapped financial services firms, real estate developers, healthcare providers, oil companies, and many other corporate interests, the records show.

READ FULL POST HERE


***********mORE oBAMA sTUFF****

  • One of Sen. Obama’s biggest donors is the energy giant Exelon:

Exelon is the sixth largest donor to Sen. Obama’s presidential campaign and the fourth largest career donor to Obama’s federal campaigns. Exelon employees have donated over $269,100 to his federal campaigns and over $194,750 in 2008. [opensecrets.org, 2008, 2004-2008]

Central to Obama’s message of change are claims that he is free of lobbyist influence. But in fact, he has been, and still is being funded by some of the same sort of interests and corporate interests as Clinton and other candidates through big corporate donors known as bundlers.

In fact, he’s received so much funding, an estimated $30 million per month, that his campaign appears to be backpedaling on a November pledge where he said if he was the Democratic nominee, he would aggressively pursue and agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.

“The Washington Post” said in a February 16 editorial that “this kind of backtracking and parsing is’t what the millions of voters who have been inspired by Mr. Obama are looking for.”

More telling, a November 2006 Harpers article “The Making of a Washington Machine” by Ken Silverstein quoted an anonymous Washington lobbyist, “big donors would not be helping out OBama if they didn’t see him as a player.”

Article: Sen. Obama finesses his lobbyist ties - Posted Posted: 04/19/07

In a fundraising e-mail sent to supporters at the beginning of March, the candidate wrote that Washington’s special-interest industry is trying “to own our political process and dictate our policies in Washington.

“We’re not going to play that game. We’re not taking any contributions from Washington lobbyists or political action committees. We’re going to transform the political process by bringing together hundreds of thousands of ordinary Americans to build a campaign.”

Sphere: Related Content

Blog Watch John McCain

Thursday, February 21st, 2008


mccain_cop.jpg
Y’all know I don’t think much of McCain so any blog post that put him under the microscope will always be of interest to me. Check it out: From the blog (No More Incumbents Blog) I like the title, KILL INCUMBENTS!!!  

The Post: John McCain Connecting the Dots Career, Scandals and Affairs

Sphere: Related Content

Michelle Obama said it! No seriously she did, I heard her!

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

obamas.jpgI’m just scanning sites and blogs peeping the buzz on Michelle Obama. No rhyme or reason to these quotes. Mostly posing as reference and to kinda catalogue. I’m just noting that her quote is sparking a tremendous amount of discussion on the web and talk radio.
As I told this gentleman, I left a brief remark on his site; he has since left me a brief note. Anywho as I have already said oft, she better clarify this remark and quickly or she better lay low for a few weeks. Obama can’t have any more bimbo eruptions.


(link)  - “My God, who can sit here and say, ‘I’m ready to be president and first lady?’ ” she asked. But like her husband, she is running on biography, suggesting that her most important qualifications are her life experiences. Daughter of a Chicago city pump operator who had multiple sclerosis, she graduated from Princeton and Harvard and juggles her job as a hospital executive with motherhood and civic work.Mrs. Obama dislikes politics, friends and family confirmed, but not as much as she dislikes losing. Craig Robinson, her brother and the Brown University men’s basketball coach, said his sister did not enjoy organized sports when she was younger because she so hated defeat and even now pouts when a board game does not go her way.

His sister is brainy and warm, he said, but also a force to be reckoned with.“Everyone in the family is afraid of her,” he said with a smile. Asked if Mr. Obama used a nicotine patch to quit smoking, Mr. Robinson cracked up. “Michelle Obama!” he said. “That’s one hell of a patch right there!”

********

Vanity Fair quoted this statement, which seems resentful toward her husband and men in general:

“Mrs. Obama has a long history of speaking out about the ways in which men’s choices-particularly their professional ambitions-often leave their wives to pick up the slack, even when they have their own careers. “What I notice about men, all men, is that their order is me, my family, God is in there somewhere, but me is first,” she told the Chicago Tribune in 2004.

“And for women, me is fourth, and that’s not healthy.”

********


“I also have a strong disdain for Mrs. Obama. What bugs me is her bitchy attitude. She seems to have adopted a persona similiar to what you might see on a sitcom. On sitcoms, the husband is invariably a bumbling halfwit, whose hijinks are endured by an intelligent, long-suffering wife. Think “Everybody Loves Ramond” or “The Simpsons” for just two prominent examples.

 I’ve seen interviews with Michelle Obama where she badmouths her husband, making him seem just as much of a hapless fool as Homer Simpson or Al Bundy. Affirmative Action candidate or not, her husband has a shot at the White House, and she’s going around telling people that he can’t dress himself without her?Damn, woman, show some respect for your man! I really don’t want that America-hating shrew as First Lady”

*******

(link)  - I’m sure it’s hard to campaign and speak frequently without misspeaking or conveying something other than you mean. It’s certainly true with blogging, and public speaking is even more prone to errors. I would also understand a young person like Michelle Obama who might be enthusiastic about American politics for the first time, but she sounded like she really meant this is the first time in her adult life she has been proud of America.

*****


(link)  - As some have pointed out, Obama’s message of hope is based primarily on the assumption that the United States is a miserable country where no one can prosper, succeed, and be happy. His wife apparently feels the same way.

********

From Media Matters:

In a discussion of recent comments made by Michelle Obama, Bill O’Reilly took a call from a listener who stated that, according to “a friend who had knowledge of her,” Obama ” ‘is a very angry,’ her word was ‘militant woman.’ “

O’Reilly later stated: “I don’t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama (odd choice of words from Mr. O) unless there’s evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that’s how she really feels — that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever — then that’s legit. We’ll track it down.”

Sphere: Related Content

Pro Hillary 527 Formed to Hit Obama

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008


barack21.jpg

Democratic insiders have set up a new independent 527 organization called the American Leadership Project (ALP) to help Hillary Clinton beat Barack Obama in Ohio — and possibly Texas and Pennsylvania as well.The group will use TV ads, mail, and phone communications to target white women under 50 in several Ohio cities, including Cleveland, Columbus, and Youngstown.

If there are any excess funds, ads will also target Latinos in Texas and middle-class families in Pennsylvania, ABC News reports.

ALP has developed three ads promoting the idea that Obama is a talker and not a doer. The ads are called “If speeches could solve problems” — and while they don’t specifically mention Obama, they will contrast Obama and Clinton on issues of importance to middle-class voters, such as the economy, health care, and the mortgage crisis.

More on Newsmax

Sphere: Related Content

First Chuck Barkley, now Michelle Obama, who will be the next idiot Obama supporter to insert foot in mouth?

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

UPDATE - When I wrote this rant at the time I did not know this: Bill O’Reilly

Now, the problem with that statement is the words “for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country.” Perhaps Michelle Obama simply misspoke. That happens all the time when you give speeches. But Mrs. Obama said it twice in two different speeches.
Now I’m willing, I’m willing to give Mrs. Obama the benefit of the doubt if she wants that benefit. The problem is she’s been silent, letting others speak for her.

Keep that in mind, when (or if) Michelle goes on a “I DIDN’T MEAN IT” talk show tour, starting with Oprah. She clearly meant it.

************Original Post***********
I’ve been pondering all day that stupid ass remark Michelle Obama made and I tried like hell to come up with something relevant, something worthy of inquisitive eyes. You know what I could not come up with anything to say, her comments, so outlandish and repugnant there is no explaining her either colossal stupidity or she has already learned that there will always be a segment of the American population, where playing the victim makes you somehow noble, cool, aware, a proud non conformist.
Politics is already a cesspool of corruption made up of the most egotistical manipulative people on the planet. Michelle fits in nicely.

I think about my own life, I’m as Middle American as they come, ridiculously simple, wanting for nothing, I have a nice job, one where I can easily work until I’m 70 or more in relative comfort.
I have a great wife, a loving family, some issues, but certainly nothing that causes me any great concern.
I have been virtually around this entire nation, and had the opportunity to travel Europe.
I have been involved in some great endeavors, had the opportunity to meet and work with some extraordinary people.
Mrs. Snoop and I are not wealthy folks, not will we ever be, unless we hit the lotto, but I’m cool with that.

I have never climbed towering peaks, rode the great wave, or sought the adrenalin rush of lets say bungee jumping off a picturesque bridge or skydiving into a beautiful valley.
I have never had the opportunity to either speak to or perform before a crowd of thousands with adoring applauses afterwards.
I have never made it big on Wall Street, nor have I closed a multi-million dollar real estate or business deal.
I have never owned a business, never with my own two hands constructed my own home.

Although I have many times experienced racism, been treated less than fair on some occasions, and have been frustrated at some of the decisions I have made that caused me to take a less than desirable path. Good, bad or otherwise I have never questioned the greatness of this nation nor oblivious to the fact that if I desired to achieve greatness that being an American gives me a distinct advantage millions come here to take advantage of each year.
This nation provides an abundance of opportunities to those that CHOOSE to take advantage of it.

Michelle Obama the wife of a man in a very exclusive club, United States Senator.
Friend of and political partner of arguable the richest and most influential woman in the world Oprah Winfrey.
This woman, hugely successful with more money that I will ever see, I guess is not proud or our American standard of living compared to people throughout the world.
Even in some of America’s most impoverished areas our poor are not living in grass huts, without running water. Let not forget most likely drive decent automobiles, has multiple TV’s (with cable) and most of their lives paid for on the backs of hard working Americans.

I’m sure in the next day or so, she will qualify her remarks and try to brush them aside.
To me this little incident only outlines just how far politics has fallen in this nation.
To think that by disparaging a nation that has provided her with so much is in her mind “necessary” to court the political favor of those who would just assume this nation be brought to its knees is frankly sickening.

What the hell, all I can say is we simply need to make damm sure that individuals like Michelle Obama and her ilk are not bestowed the honor of representing this nation as first lady.

I’m sure one of those diseased ravaged, war torn, AIDS infested African countries will make her queen.
But ya know the funny thing is one of her first acts as African queen would be to meet with evil American leaders to beg for money.

Yes, America sucks until you need our damm money, or the blood of our soldiers to liberate you.

******

Sphere: Related Content

In election 2008, don’t forget Angry White Man

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

hillary31.jpgRush shared this on his show today, so I’m passing it on.

By Gary Hubbell - February 9, 2008 - Aspen Times News


There is a great amount of interest in this year’s presidential elections, as everybody seems to recognize that our next president has to be a lot better than George Bush. The Democrats are riding high with two groundbreaking candidates — a woman and an African-American — while the conservative Republicans are in a quandary about their party’s nod to a quasi-liberal maverick, John McCain.Each candidate is carefully pandering to a smorgasbord of special-interest groups, ranging from gay, lesbian and transgender people to children of illegal immigrants to working mothers to evangelical Christians.

There is one group no one has recognized, and it is the group that will decide the election: the Angry White Man. The Angry White Man comes from all economic backgrounds, from dirt-poor to filthy rich. He represents all geographic areas in America, from urban sophisticate to rural redneck, deep South to mountain West, left Coast to Eastern Seaboard.

His common traits are that he isn’t looking for anything from anyone — just the promise to be able to make his own way on a level playing field. In many cases, he is an independent businessman and employs several people. He pays more than his share of taxes and works hard.

The victimhood syndrome buzzwords — “disenfranchised,” “marginalized” and “voiceless” — don’t resonate with him. “Press ‘one’ for English” is a curse-word to him. He’s used to picking up the tab, whether it’s the company Christmas party, three sets of braces, three college educations or a beautiful wedding.

He believes the Constitution is to be interpreted literally, not as a “living document” open to the whims and vagaries of a panel of judges who have never worked an honest day in their lives.

The Angry White Man owns firearms, and he’s willing to pick up a gun to defendhillarymarines.JPG his home and his country. He is willing to lay down his life to defend the freedom and safety of others, and the thought of killing someone who needs killing really doesn’t bother him.

The Angry White Man is not a metrosexual, a homosexual or a victim. Nobody like him drowned in Hurricane Katrina — he got his people together and got the hell out, then went back in to rescue those too helpless and stupid to help themselves, often as a police officer, a National Guard soldier or a volunteer firefighter.

His last name and religion don’t matter. His background might be Italian, English, Polish, German, Slavic, Irish, or Russian, and he might have Cherokee, Mexican, or Puerto Rican mixed in, but he considers himself a white American.

He’s a man’s man, the kind of guy who likes to play poker, watch football, hunt white-tailed deer, call turkeys, play golf, spend a few bucks at a strip club once in a blue moon, change his own oil and build things. He coaches baseball, soccer and football teams and doesn’t ask for a penny. He’s the kind of guy who can put an addition on his house with a couple of friends, drill an oil well, weld a new bumper for his truck, design a factory and publish books. He can fill a train with 100,000 tons of coal and get it to the power plant on time so that you keep the lights on and never know what it took to flip that light switch.

Women either love him or hate him, but they know he’s a man, not a dishrag. If they’re looking for someone to walk all over, they’ve got the wrong guy. He stands up straight, opens doors for women and says “Yes, sir” and “No, ma’am.”

He might be a Republican and he might be a Democrat; he might be a Libertarian or a Green. He knows that his wife is more emotional than rational, and he guides the family in a rational manner.

He’s not a racist, but he is annoyed and disappointed when people of certain backgrounds exhibit behavior that typifies the worst stereotypes of their race. He’s willing to give everybody a fair chance if they work hard, play by the rules and learn English.

Most important, the Angry White Man is pissed off. When his job site becomes flooded with illegal workers who don’t pay taxes and his wages drop like a stone, he gets righteously angry. When his job gets shipped overseas, and he has to speak to some incomprehensible idiot in India for tech support, he simmers. When Al Sharpton comes on TV, leading some rally for reparations for slavery or some such nonsense, he bites his tongue and he remembers. When a child gets charged with carrying a concealed weapon for mistakenly bringing a penknife to school, he takes note of who the local idiots are in education and law enforcement.

He also votes, and the Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him of a shovel scraping a rock. He recoils at the mere sight of her on television. Her very image disgusts him, and he cannot fathom why anyone would want her as their leader. It’s not that she is a woman. It’s that she is who she is. It’s the liberal victim groups she panders to, the “poor me” attitude that she represents, her inability to give a straight answer to an honest question, his tax dollars that she wants to give to people who refuse to do anything for themselves.

There are many millions of Angry White Men. Four million Angry White Men are members of the National Rifle Association, and all of them will vote against Hillary Clinton, just as the great majority of them voted for George Bush.

He hopes that she will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, and he will make sure that she gets beaten like a drum.


hillarytaxes1.jpg

Sphere: Related Content

Obama Caught Plagiarizing 2006 Speech?

Monday, February 18th, 2008
Big Head DC  - has discovered alarming similarities between a speech made by Sen. Barack Obama on February 16 while campaigning for president in Wisconsin and an October 2006 speech made by Deval Patrick, the current Democratic governor of Massachusetts. The coincidences would seem to indicate that Obama copied several lines and linguistic speech patterns from Patrick’s “Just Words” speech for Obama’s own “Words Matter” speech. Indeed, words do matter. And they matter even more when they are one’s own words.

The two speeches can be compared, in all their eerie detail, via YouTube:

Plagiarizing a speech during a presidential campaign was enough to end Sen. Joe Biden’s first bid for the presidency. From Wikipedia:

In 1987, Joe Biden ran as a Democratic presidential candidate. When the campaign began, he was considered a frontrunner because of his moderate image. However, the campaign ended when he was accused of plagiarizing a speech by Neil Kinnock, then-leader of the British Labour Party. Though Biden had correctly credited the original author in all speeches but one, the one where he failed to make mention of the originator was caught on video. In the video Biden is filmed repeating a stump speech by Kinnock, with only minor modifications.

Sphere: Related Content