politicalpartypoop.com

An anti-war protestor, with red paint on her hands, jumps up in front of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice before Rice testifies before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington October 24, 2007. At right is the committee Chairman Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA).

Folks I’m gonna say something that may offend some (Yes, I know it has not stopped me yet) but, if a bunch of black folks were to bust in a meeting with a WHITE Secretary of State, man or woman, they would be shot!

I get dirty looks from rednecks coming into my own damm building when I’m dressed casually.
How the fuck does a bunch of crazy ass white ladies continue to interrupt and disrupt these meetings and come nose to nose with a high ranking official?!

I have been the chair of several civic boards, and my first order of business at any “controversial meetings” was to tell any crazy mutherfuckers… true shit, “if you interrupt my meeting acting crazy, I’ll have your ass arrested and banned from any further meetings, you have a responsibility to act like a civilized human being.”

Whoever runs security at these congressional meetings needs to be fucken fired, this is a damm joke.
 Like I said a bunch of Negros could not go around disrupting congressional meeting with a bunch of white folks.

These crazy white bitches should be ashamed of themselves acting like ignorant fucks.
They need to be in jail or on Meds!

ok time for a drink….

From Hot Air, Snoop, why do you think all liberals are fucked up in the head? This video is just another of many examples…

So self-parodic is this all the way around the horn that I can’t muster the requisite outrage. Of course David Crosby thinks American soldiers are out to kill women. Of course Graham Nash thinks “dialogue” is the answer to suicidal jihadism. Of course Chris Matthews doesn’t think he’s a Marxist even as he’s mouthing rhetoric straight from the Daily Worker. Of course, of course.
A lot of golden moments packed into 130+ seconds but if I have only one to take with me to the grave, it’s the knowing look Nash shoots Matthews after he very smartly suggests opposing the war as a good way for the Church to distract people from that nasty business with the altar boys. You’re nobody’s fool, Nashy!

From Moonbattery

The latest skirmish in the moonbat war on Christianity is taking place at East Brunswick High School in New Jersey, where school officials have declared that football coach Marcus Borden cannot so much as bow his head in reverence when his team prays.Although totalitarian moonbats have not yet been able to take away the right of players to pray, coaches are alleged to be public officials not entitled to the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. According to the ACLU of New Jersey, Borden’s silent show of respect for God fosters a “destructive environment.” This satanic organization has taken the case to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Wars have been fought over far less than what the ACLU is doing to this country.

Ok, I’m scanning through various sites and I find this article by the BBC entitled: Che: The icon and the ad.

Here is the first portion of the article:

Che Guevara, his eyes framed by heavy brows, a single-starred beret pulled over his unruly hair, stares out of the shot with glowering intensity.It’s now 40 years since the Argentine-born rebel was shot dead, so any young radicals who cheered on his revolutionary struggles in Cuba and Bolivia are well into middle age.

But the image has been infinitely repeated - emblazoned on T-shirts and sprayed on to walls, transformed into pop art and used to wrap ice-creams and sell cigarettes - and its appeal has not faded.

“There is no other image like it. What other image has been sustained in this way?” asks Trisha Ziff, the curator of a touring exhibition on the iconography of Che.

“Che Guevara has become a brand. And the brand’s logo is the image, which represents change. It has becomes the icon of the outside thinker, at whatever level - whether it is anti-war, pro-green or anti-globalisation,” she says.

Read the rest of the article here if you wish.

Now after I finished laughing at another example of liberals never ending search for symbolic images to inspire themselves and to present a “cool” image to others, I could not help but to be inspired by the gospel according to Chris, now I’m not picking on him, but frankly his words inspire me. I wish I had more participants on this site that would be more participatory and express more heart felt opinions. As Mrs. Snoop can attest nothing motivates me more that to be challenged on my principles.

What few people know outside those who frequent this blog is my views on the world have changed very little since I was very young. I got to my way of thinking by observing and paying attention to the world around me, by being a realist about how to interpret what I see, what people say, how they say it, what I read and WHY was it written.

Ah I miss the days on Lawrence.com and the heated political and societal exchanges that took place for a time.
More constant rants were followed up by my dear daughter-in-law suggesting that I start my own blog and more than two years later here I am ranting, news aggregating but most of all learning.

Back to Mr. Che; the link to the Che article was accompanied by a picture of Jay-Z on stage performing proudly wearing “Che fashion” designs. Frankly any black person wearing Che garb is exceedingly clueless, but who am I to judge.

I am reminded back in the day when clueless black folks would wear Malcolm X fashions, t-shirts, necklaces, ball caps, ect and when I first noticed the trend I use to think to myself are some of these fools wearing this stuff particularly when it was highly unlikely that many of the people wearing the garb even know who the hell Malcolm X was or what he stood for.
Black folks also were fond of African fashions as well, the fact that Africa comprises 46 countries is of course irrelevant, not to mention that most black “Africans” have little respect and show contempt for black folks here in America.
Yes I know, “Snoop we is just connecting with our homeland!”

Funny thing tho, you rarely saw folks sporting Martin Luther King merchandise, but he was a peaceful soul, refused to blame whitey, saw a future where we will be judge not by the color of our skin but the content of our character.

However according to Chris; “anyone who denies their own ethnic identity is denying themselves.”
Not to go into why I found that line of thinking irrelevant years ago, but way too many of us need some sort of symbolism to define ourselves. Whether it’s our particular faith, our political leanings or something as superficial as what sports team we cheer for or what body part we need to tattoo or pierce. Others use the flag (U.S.) , or a flag (confederate) other use their ethnicity.
The problem with black folks is we deny the other parts of who we are and ONLY promote the pigment portion of who we are.

Never mind that, again, back to Che; I find is an exceedingly ridiculous symbol, nevertheless his image is prominently displayed at virtually every liberal protest or anti-American rally.
As I am hammering this post out I’m thinking do the people who wear the Che icon even know who the fuck he was?
Now I know the people who can tolerate my grammatically flawed rants here are exceedingly educated, however in case someone read this who is not familiar with our friend Che…

“Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!”
“Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become … “Che Guevara

I find it fascinating that liberals believe that “Man” is innately good. The good just has to be encouraged by unrestrained personal license and therapy. So, evils like (Che),  crime and terrorism cannot be simply condemned as evil. Liberals have to look for a “politically-correct” root cause for wrongdoing.

Popular scapegoats for Liberals are: “Poverty” (even when that poverty is the fruit of a dysfunctional society unwilling to adapt to new realities), “Racism”(which might limit one’s opportunities but doesn’t lead directly to criminal behavior), “Zionism” (the Jews always make a convenient scapegoat), “Colonialism” (even though most of the colonial empires educated their subjects and built enough infrastructure for said former subjects to make a better go at modern statehood than they otherwise could have), or “Alienation” ( a convenient dodge for those who lack ambition, a work ethic, or any sense of personal responsibility).

Therefore, the United States, being relatively rich, powerful, and the world’s policeman must be the cause of all the world’s ills. The solution is to hand our American sovereignty and military over to the Che’s of the world.

Supporting Che was just about making a statement - of sticking it to companies, America and the West.
Making Che Guevara into someone worthy of admiration is the most successful thing the ‘Left’ has managed to do in the past fifty years. Forget the fact that this is the man, who had no shame in murdering innocent civilians, was a major human rights violator, and put gays (who were ‘deviants’), religious minorities and other undesirables into concentration camps.
I can hear some of you ranting “Oh but Snoop you clearly don’t understand”; ok I’m trying to write this piece with a straight face.

How can Liberals make such a morally ignorant symbol? It’s really quite simple. First off, to a liberal, history is mutable. History to be valid has to be reinterpreted by each generation and by each “oppressed minority”. You end up with no history at all, unless it is in the Orwellian sense of constant reinvention to suit the causes of the immediate present.

Facts don’t matter much either. Facts are hard and cold, results don’t matter, only intentions. How else can a bloody-handed murderer like Che Guevara still remain a cool lefty icon? So what if Castro runs real gulags and Guevara was his hangman? Castro brought free health care and education to Cuba.

It’s all about emotions. Liberals have to be constantly outraged,  they feel the need to express their outrage by outraging others. Why else would a picture of a crucifix and a beaker of piss be considered great art and a murderous human being is considered a fashion statement.

However I am scolded once again because I foolishly believe that my political ideals and values are manufactured and I engage in “conservative negro hysterics.” I just don’t have a suitable symbol for my hysterics.

Well then I guess I need a “symbol” that I can wear to proudly show the world my conservative Negro hysterics, maybe a Booker T. Washington t-shirt!

From the blog Amy Proctor, I’m telling you these women in Code Pink have some serious mental health issues.
It’s almost sad to watch them make complete asses of themselves in very public forums.****

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who last week said ”We must prepare for the worst” against Iran (referring to war), addressed Center for Strategic and International Studies where he was interrupted by (sigh, who else..) Code Pink.

*********       

This from WorldNetDaily

 .

Muslim terrorist leaders are “thankful” for the efforts of activist and congressional candidate Cindy Sheehan, stating in a new book Sheehan’s anti-Iraq war activities and her statements against President Bush “give us hope” the U.S. will change its Mideast policies.

“You [Sheehan] give us hope and you show us that there are different Americans than those whom we know,” stated Ramadan Adassi, chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group in the West Bank’s Anskar Refugee Camp.

“This sincere woman says what we’ve been saying all these last years – Saddam never threatened America or its security. Now Iraq is being decimated and America is losing. Voices like Sheehan’s show things can change,” said Adassi.

Read the rest here

By Cathy Beers - National Ledger

Barry Manilow performed at ‘The Today Show 2007 Summer Concert Series’ on NBC held at the Rockefeller Plaza on Monday. But the cowardly singer slash songwriter won’t be making a scheduled appearance on the ABC morning gab fest ‘The View.’ It appears the washed up singer is afraid he may get the Rosie O’Donnell treatment.

Who is he afraid of - the resident and token Republican on the show Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Can you believe it? Elisabeth was once the meek voice overpowered by blowhards like Rosie O’Donnell until she finally stood up to her towards the end of last season.

After an explosive on screen fiery debate, Rosie ran way never to return to the program. Now it appears that Barry is as big of a coward. In a predictable and an exclusive statement to TMZ, Barry says, “I strongly disagree with her views. I think she’s dangerous and offensive. I will not be on the same stage as her.”

Manilow is currently on a press tour promoting the release of his new album, “Greatest Songs of the Seventies.” One must wonder if Barry will sack it up and return any money from people that think like Elisabeth and still buy his album.

Here’s an idea - it’s already thee or four to one on every show against Hacklebeck, maybe Barry could go on and hide behind Whoopi Goldberg’s skirt.

Fucken piece of shit liberal coward, are you serious!?
Elizabeth is seriously outnumbered on that damm show and this old musical hack retard wants to make some bullshit political statement.
Good luck on promoting your suck ass album. Sure, alienate half the country, and the small percentage who may consider buying your elevator music.
I don’t listen to your shity ass music anyway.

First the Flying Nun goes ballistic and now this.
Who will be the next retard Hollywood limousine liberal to say something stupid?

Hey Barry get a clue: Offenders forced to listen to Barry Manilow

A COLORADO judge has sentenced people busted for noise pollution to one hour of listening to unpopular or unusual music.Mostly young adult offenders were kept in a room and made to listen to Dolly Parton’s I Will Always Love You, Karen Carpenter and Barry Manilow with the volume up loud, CBS4Denver.com reported.

Most offenders, who were not allowed to eat, drink, read or sleep, found the punishment funny at first. But then the boredom set in.

“At about 20 minutes into it, I was trying not to fall a sleep,” offender Luis Cano said.

Judge Paul Sacco, who carries out the punishment about four times per year, said the sentenced fit the crime.

“When you have a person playing rap at extreme volumes all over the city, and they have to sit down and listen for an hour to Barry Manilow, its horrible punishment,” he said.

.

In a December 9, 2004 e-mail to supporters, MoveOn.org leaders Eli Pariser and Justin Ruben wrote, “In the last year, grassroots contributors like us gave more than $300 million to the Kerry campaign and the DNC, and proved that the Party doesn’t need corporate cash to be competitive. Now it’s our Party: we bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back.”The September 10 full-page MoveOn.org ad in the New York Times – and the Dems’ reaction to it — apparently proved the point.

Appearing on the first day of Gen. David Petraeus’ congressional testimony, the MoveOn ad featured a half-page picture of Petraeus above the headline, “General Petraeus or Betray Us?” It said, “General Petraeus is a military man consistently at war with the facts…Today, before Congress and before the American people, General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us.”

Americans’ reaction to the ad – at least Americans who aren’t Democrats seeking national office — has been hugely negative. The outpouring of anger at MoveOn has the MoveOners scared. Late last week, Pariser sent out another e-mail asking supporters if they were ‘on the same page’ with the MoveOn leaders, and the MoveOn website posted this whiny “explanation” which says, in part: “MoveOn is a member-driven organization. There will always be moments where consensus is impossible, but if MoveOn members don’t feel good in general about what we’re all doing together, MoveOn simply can’t function. That’s why we take the concerns of every member very seriously.” More seriously than they take the facts.

If Republicans can capitalize on America’s reaction, the MoveOners will have made a mistake that costs the Democrats the White House.

Read the rest by Jed Babbin on Human Events

Found this on the blog: Politik Ditto

Hat Tip: Gateway Pundit

THIS IS JUST SCARY!
On the radio last night (actually a few days ago) John Gibson compared the words of the world’s most wanted terrorist, Osama Bin Laden, with the words of Keith Olbermann.

Ah hell I can’t resist posting shit about loony idiot ass liberals.

Good reads from Michelle Malkin

The tale of Army Private Scott Thomas Beauchamp, the discredited “Baghdad Diarist” for the discredited New Republic magazine, is an old tale:Self-aggrandizing soldier recounts war atrocities. Media outlets disseminate soldier’s tales uncritically. Military folks smell a rat and poke holes in tales too good (or rather, bad) to be true. Soldier’s ideological sponsors blame the messengers for exposing anti-war fraud.Beauchamp belongs in the same ward as John F. Kerry, the original infectious agent of the toxic American disease known as Winter Soldier Syndrome. The ward is filling up.

U.S. military investigators concluded this week that Beauchamp concocted allegations of troop misconduct in a series of essays for The New Republic. “The investigation is complete and the allegations from PVT Beauchamp are false,” Major Steven Lamb, a spokesman for Multi National Division-Baghdad, told USA Today. The New Republic is standing by Beauchamp’s work. But Michael Goldfarb, online editor and blogger at The Weekly Standard who first challenged Beauchamp’s writing, reported Monday that Beauchamp had “signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in The New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods — fabrications containing only ‘a smidgen of truth,’ in the words of our source.”

Read the rest here

This from Atlas Shrugs

Gateway has been following it all here. 

The Weekly Standard Blog has been leading the efforts to find the truth behind the disgusting anti-military hit pieces at The New Republic.

Today, Multi-National Force Iraq responded to the horrific allegations of war crimes at the liberal magazine. It is more evidence that the writer who goes by the name “Scott Thomas” at The New Republic is slandering the troops in Iraq:

Read the rest here

***** 

Michelle Malkin has more anti military from Daily Kos: “KILLITARY” and the Daily Kos Update: Who is “liquidman?” 
The diary has now been deleted. It was cross-posted here and now that post has also been deleted. Ace had a correspondent who was able to save and capture the post’s text. Here’s the intro:

KILLITARY: Are America’s Armed Forces Creating Serial Killers and Mass Murderers?

This article in no way is meant to suggest that all miltary members will become serial killers or mass murderers. It does point out a serious problem with what is happening in our armed forces and seeks a solution to help the brave men and women on their return back home.

According to the July 30, 2007 issue of The Nation magazine, damning photos of a U.S. Soldier using a spoon to literally scoop out the brains of a dead Iraqi and pretending to eat the gray matter were recently acquired.

Of course, everyone is appropriately appalled and make all claims of disgust and finger-wagging. Research shows, however, that such unacceptable behavior happens more often than the United States military wants you to know.

When it comes to training killing machines, the military really does create “an Army of one.”

The list of serial killers and mass murderers borne from the military is astounding.

Read more at Michelle Malkin

U. of Colorado President: Fire Ward Churchill
***

Below is an old article by Victor David Hansen on National Review from March 24, 2005
I find it remarkable that this fool is allowed to teach at a major University. The bigger fools are the people who take his classes.
Good for the CU president for speaking out and exposing this fraud.

Churchill, Rosie and Ron Paul can start a new show “A Fools View.” What is kind of disturbing is that the show would do pretty well, there are a lot of moronic people who agree with these Moonbats.

*****

(Article Link) Does Ward Churchill even exist?

Dr., Native American, original artist, serious scholar, combat veteran, highly recruited and sought-after academic, ex-Weatherman mentor: How many — if any — of these seven faces of our real-life Dr. Lao are true?

Professors outside the arts at major research universities are supposed to have Ph.D.s. The phantom Ward Churchill does not. How he was hired, promoted, and tenured without a doctorate is a mystery — the equivalent of a high-school teacher credentialed with an AA degree, or a medical doctor operating without an M.D.

Ward Churchill proclaimed that he is a Native American of various tribal affiliations; he is not. Even his ridiculous costumes, occasional threats, and puerile rants cannot disguise that fact.

He seems to be a pop artist of sorts, but his canvasses are not quite his own either. Those of like political mind have praised his scholarship, but much of what he writes seems derivative, or misrepresents or outright plagiarizes others.

Churchill has spoken of the firsthand trauma of battle service as a combat veteran, both as a paratrooper and as a sniper — among the most hazardous of corps in the United States military. Once again, there is no such evidence that he served in any capacity other than what his official duties in a motor pool and as a projectionist entailed.

Embarrassed officials claim Churchill was sought after by other universities — so they had to reel in this trophy catch before he got away — but no one can find any proof other than Churchill’s own mendacious claims.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Found on the Blog:  Stop the ACLU: Crossposted at Church and State

The ACLU is challenging an elective Bible history class, which was approved by the Ector County School Board in December 2005, that it is “promoting religion.” Quick question: do science classes “promote science?” Just wondering. Another question: Are electives optional?

The course [called “The Bible in History and Literature“] is now taught in two high schools in Odessa, Texas — Permian High School and Odessa High School. Rather than teaching about the Bible objectively in a historical or literary context, the course promotes religion, as well as a particular religious viewpoint, that is not shared by Jews, Catholics, Orthodox Christians and many Protestants. The course uses the King James Version as its main textbook, which is not the Bible of choice for a wide range of Christian denominations, nor for members of the Jewish faith.

Read the rest

Found article via Conservative Grapevine 

By Norman Podhoretz

In spite of what the polls supposedly tell us, I strongly suspect that the Democrats may already have blown the 2008 election. Unlike the late Senator Aiken of Vermont, who proposed that we declare victory and get out of Vietnam, the Democrats want us to declare defeat and get out of Iraq. This, they imagine, is what the American people were demanding in the congressional election of 2006.

But it seems far more likely that the message of that election was not “Get out,” but rather “Win, or get out.” In any case, the position the Democrats are now taking can only have the effect of revivifying and reinforcing the sense of them as weak on national security. And this was the very factor that led to the ignominious defeat of their presidential candidate, George McGovern, in 1972, when they also misread the public temper by paying too much attention to the left wing of their party.

Read the rest here

Someone sent this video response to me, I’m just amazed, well maybe not. Good Democratic/liberal propaganda crap.

If you want to know why Niggas today are so fucked up, because I bet countless numbers of ignorant ass black folks watch this video and said, “yo dudes are speaking the truth.”

Fucken comedians, actors and rappers getting paid by Democrats to write some bullshit ghetto ass tune to get skulls full of mush to get worked up at the notion that ONE MAN is capable of such a catastrophic event.

Since black rappers are the ones behind this, I would love to ask them is the enemy Bush or white folks in general? And instead of writing liberal propaganda jingles how come they are not out educating ghetto kids on this country and what is going on.

Ya know why because after they have written the latest “bitches and hoes” tune or another liberal propaganda clip they are layin up in their million dollar cribs, driving Bentleys and Escalades drinking pimp juice and getting fucked up.
Many of the Negros this video is targeting are reading Ebony or Jet, planning their night at the club hanging out at the barber shop talking about Kobe’s latest 50 point night and getting their hair did. Plez.

These crazy niggas want to run all of this anti-American bullshit knowing damm well that they could never make as much money nor be as successful anywhere else in the world.
Try You Tubing some anti-Iraqi, anti Muslin, better yet anti Vladimir Putin rap they would be dead.
Anywhere else they would be broke or in prison. Bunch of fake ass idiots niggas need to shut the fuck up.

Reason number 4,996,202 why Democrats want to keep people stupid and ignorant, it’s the best way to manipulate people who do know any better that way they stay in power.

I can see the DNC strategy session, let’s see write a catchy tune (you know black folks will dance to anything with a good beat) and repeat something stupid, something anti-Bush and anti-Republican. Amazing!

Jimmy Carter likes it, too.

“Terrorists endorse Pelosi’s ‘good policy of dialogue’: Militants call House speaker’s visit ‘brave’ and hope for talks with Iran,” by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily, with thanks to Davida:

Editor’s note: Listen to audio of terrorists endorsing Nancy Pelosi’s visit by Clicking here.JERUSALEM – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit today to Syria – in which she called for dialogue with Damascus – was “brave” and “very appreciated” and could bring about “important changes” to America’s foreign policy, including talks with “Middle East resistance groups,” according to members of terror organizations here whose top leaders live in Syria.

Check out the rest from Right Wing News 

Click on photo to view, this is a nice subtle info piece highlighting the products that are advertised during “The View.”
If Rosie wants to run her fat ass mouth on network television she is free to do so but people who are sick of listening to her fat ass should know who is paying her salary.
She is looking at trying to get a $40 million dollar contract renewal, that is insane that Disney and ABC would pay that terrorist pimp hog that kind of money.

When The View comes off of vacation, I’m going to record the commercials of every advertiser and add them to my You Tube collection to l et folks know who is supporting her anti-American bullshit, I hope others do the same.

More discussion on O’Reilly

Found on the blog Moonbattery , via  BelchSpeak. Amazing!

Enraged over the removal of a beautiful two-foot gold cross from William and Mary’s Wren Chapel on the grounds that a cross in a chapel might offend Muslims and moonbats, a donor has nixed a $12 million pledge to the university.

GOOD, THE IDIOT BASTARDS!

That’s a high price to pay for an opportunity to poke Christians in the eye, but educrats at William and Mary — which was founded by a church — remain stoic. President Gene Nichol announced that the money withheld “only hurts our students” and piously crowed:

Diversity, including religious diversity, remains a core value of this institution. The core values of the college cannot be for sale.

By “diversity,” he means suppressing Christianity — and hosting obscene sex shows.

Click on Photo to View

Gathering of Eagles
ANSWER: Behind the placards
Move America Forward
March 17 Moonbat March I’m in DC that weekend, YIPEE!

AP: ACLU defends terror supporters’ right to U.S. access

NEW YORK (AP) — A civil rights group asked a judge Friday to find it unconstitutional for the federal government to exclude a prominent Muslim scholar or anyone else from the United States on the grounds that they may have endorsed or espoused terrorism.

In case it didn’t sink in the first time:

NEW YORK (AP) — A civil rights group asked a judge Friday to find it unconstitutional for the federal government to exclude a prominent Muslim scholar or anyone else from the United States on the grounds that they may have endorsed or espoused terrorism.

Got it?

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the papers attacking the policy in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The group included in its submissions a written declaration in which the scholar, Tariq Ramadan, said he has always “opposed terrorism not only through my words but also through my actions.”

The ACLU said schools and organizations who want to invite Ramadan and others into the United States are concerned about what is known as the ideological exclusion provision.

It said an entry in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual says that the provision is directed at those who have voiced “irresponsible expressions of opinion.”

As a sovereign nation, the United States has the right to bar anyone for any reason entry to our country. Advocating Islamic terrorism is probably at the top of the list of good reasons.

Read the rest at Stop the ACLU

Henryk Broder, one of Germany’s few contrarian journalists, recently wrote a book decrying the weakness of the free West in the face of Islamic fanaticism. Tongue firmly in cheek, he called it: Hurra, Wir Kapitulieren, (Hurray! We’re Capitulating). Broder was primarily addressing Europe’s political class. But if the machinations of the Democratic Congress last week are any indication, the tendency toward gleeful submission before enemy forces cannot be dismissed as an exclusively Continental phenomenon.

Exhibit A in this tendency was the passage on Friday of the “non-binding” House resolution condemning President Bush’s strategy of boosting troop levels in Baghdad. If Democrats had the courage of their antiwar convictions, they would have taken a page from their predecessors in 1973 and exercised the power of the purse to deny any further funding for the war effort. But this would require principle, however misguided, and Democrats are primarily interested in political posturing.

The result? Even as American troops were marching into battle, House Democrats, abetted by 17 Republican defectors, were prejudging their mission a failure. How to reconcile last week’s vote with the fact that just weeks ago the Democrat-led Senate unanimously approved Army Gen. David Petraeus to command that same mission is anyone’s guess. Time may yet prove the House skeptics right about the wisdom of the surge. But it won’t alter the fact that at a dire time for the country they have acquitted themselves abominably.

And they were just getting started. As a sequel to last week’s resolution, House Democrats are working on what the Politico.com website described as a “slow-bleed strategy.” Cynicism on a spectacular scale, it works like this: Into a forthcoming bill on supplemental spending for the war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Democratic leadership intends to insert prohibitive restrictions that will make it all but impossible to deploy additional troops into the military theater.

Read the rest at FrontPageMag.com

Found this post on Right Wing News, refering to an article on the Daily Kos. amazing, you need to check out: 

Over the world’s most popular liberal blog, the Daily Kos, Diarist bluedogtxn says what so many other liberals actually think — he wants to lose the war in Iraq. Here’s the clincher quote from, “The Case for Losing”:

 

“…We need to lose this war and not start the next one so that we can remain a free people. Diminished on the world stage? Perhaps, like Great Britain was diminished when it surrendered its colonial empire. But free.”

 

Can I question his patriotism now?

and why they are not as serious about the war as they say.

Tens of Thousands March Against Iraq War - BIG FUCKEN DEAL!

WASHINGTON (AP) - Convinced this is their moment, tens of thousands marched Saturday in an anti-war demonstration linking military families, ordinary people and an icon of the Vietnam protest movement in a spirited call to get out of Iraq.

Celebrities, a half-dozen lawmakers and protesters from distant states rallied in the capital under a sunny sky, seizing an opportunity to press their cause with a Congress restive on the war and a country that has turned against the conflict.

Marching with them was Jane Fonda, in what she said was her first anti-war demonstration in 34 years.

“Silence is no longer an option,” Fonda said to cheers from the stage on the National Mall. The actress once derided as “Hanoi Jane” by conservatives for her stance on Vietnam said she had held back from activism so as not to be a distraction for the Iraq anti-war movement, but needed to speak out now.

Read the rest (here) but why bother
I was in DC for six days, was in the Capital area on numerous occasions.
The entire time only one lone dude with a sign saying “Bush just purchased 90,000 acres in Paraguay” was the only representative of the loony left on display, what the hell!
Also remember I was there the day of the State of the Union Address.
If these mutherfuckers on the left are were outraged at the war and troop increases, then where the fuck were they on State of the Union Tuesday?

The area around the mall was full of satellite trucks, a couple of the network evening news programs were done live from there that day.
There were reporters all over the damm place and that does not include the folks covering the Libby mess.

So where the fuck were the protesters? On a day where you could have received shit loads of attention and coverage you choose to stay away?

So today they have some bullshit protest with what 10,000 idiots lead by Hanoi Jane and Sean Penn? Where is the goddamm outrage, where are the hundreds of thousands of people?

It only tells me that either there is not as much momentum on the left as the media says there is or you people on the left have punked out.
All of your bitching before the election is now down to a dull roar.
Your designated representatives who were suppose to go to Washington and bitch slap Bush and take back Washington from the evil GOP are now looking like a bunch of punk ass pussies passing “non-binding” resolutions and making bullshit trips to Iraq.

Why didn’t these bastards take their asses to Iraq before the elections?

This is why I’m almost glad the idiot Democrats won in November, because they look like a bunch of ignorant, confused dolts, confused about what direction they want to go in and unable to come to a consensus about any damm thing.

The Republican Party is kinda jacked right now, but with the Democrats fumbling their opportunities, the GOP will hopefully have time to get their shit together before “08.” 

Where too was Cindy Sheehan? I brought my camera just to get that idiot bitch on tape.
Even she was too damm lazy to protest. Snoop was soooo disappointed!

 Found this on Front Page Mag via Little Green Footballs.

If you ever want to know what the term “blogsturbation” means read this crap.
I tried to read twice and my face hit the keyboard each time because of boredom.

When I read diatribes like this from liberals it reminds me of an old Southern Baptist preacher who goes on and on repeating himself to rile up the congregation but more than that to hear himself talk as if he is spouting off some profound unexplored untapped knowledge.  

*** 

One of the more malevolent “diary” posts at Daily Kos that I have seen: Daily Kos: Iran Has A Right To Attack Israel. (Hat tip: marsl.)

Yes, that’s right. A long diatribe/pseudo-logical “thought exercise” that makes the case for Iran to launch a preemptive attack on both Israel and the United States, out of “respect for the basic moral principle of universality.”

Concluding with a quote from Noam Chomsky. 

By Ann Coulter - Human Events

Fortunately for liberals, the Iraqis executed Saddam Hussein the exact same week that former President Ford died, so it didn’t seem strange that Nancy Pelosi’s flag was at half-staff. Also, Saddam’s death made it less of a snub when Harry Reid skipped Ford’s funeral.

The passing of Gerald Ford should remind Americans that Democrats are always lying in wait, ready to force a humiliating defeat on America.

More troops, fewer troops, different troops, “redeployment”—all the Democrats’ peculiar little talking points are just a way of sounding busy. Who are they kidding? Democrats want to cut and run as fast as possible from Iraq, betraying the Iraqis who supported us and rewarding our enemies—exactly as they did to the South Vietnamese under Ford.

Liberals spent the Vietnam War rooting for the enemy and clamoring for America’s defeat, a tradition they have brought back for the Iraq war.

They insisted on calling the Soviet-backed Vietcong “the National Liberation Front of Vietnam,” just as they call Islamic fascists killing Americans in Iraq “insurgents.” Ho Chi Minh was hailed as a “Jeffersonian Democrat,” just as Michael Moore compares the Islamic fascists in Iraq to the Minute Men.

During the Vietnam War, New York Times scion Arthur “Pinch” Sulzberger told his father that if an American soldier ran into a North Vietnamese soldier, he would prefer for the American to get shot. “It’s the other guy’s country,” he explained.

Now, as publisher of the Times, Pinch does all he can to help the enemy currently shooting at American soldiers.

After a half-dozen years of Democrat presidents creating a looming disaster in Vietnam—with Kennedy ordering the assassination of our own ally in the middle of the war and Johnson ham-handedly choosing bombing targets from the Oval Office—in 1969, Nixon became president and the world was safe again.

Nixon began a phased withdrawal of American ground troops, while protecting the South Vietnamese by increasing the bombings of the North, mining North Vietnamese harbors and attacking North Vietnamese military supplies in Cambodia—all actions hysterically denounced by American liberals, eager for the communists to defeat America.

Despite the massive anti-war protests staged by the Worst Generation, their takeovers of university buildings and their bombings of federal property to protest the bombing of North Vietnamese property, Nixon’s Vietnam policy was apparently popular with normal Americans. In 1972, he won re-election against “peace” candidate George McGovern in a 49-state landslide.

In January 1973, the United States signed the Paris Peace accords, which would have ended the war with honor. In order to achieve a ceasefire, Nixon jammed lousy terms down South Vietnam’s throat, such as allowing Vietcong troops to remain in the South. But in return, we promised South Vietnam that we would resume bombing missions and provide military aid if the North attacked.

It would have worked, but the Democrats were desperate for America to lose. They invented “Watergate,” the corpus delicti of which wouldn’t have merited three column-inches during the Clinton years, and hounded Nixon out of office. (How’s Sandy Berger weathering that tough wrist-slap?)

Three months after Nixon was gone, we got the Watergate Congress and with it, the new Democratic Party. In lieu of the old Democratic Party, which lost wars out of incompetence and naiveté, the new Democratic Party would lose wars on purpose.

Just one month after the Watergate Congress was elected, North Vietnam attacked the South.

Even milquetoast, pro-abortion, detente-loving Gerald R. Ford knew America had to defend South Vietnam or America’s word would be worth nothing. As Ford said, “American unwillingness to provide adequate assistance to allies fighting for their lives could seriously affect our credibility throughout the world as an ally.” He pleaded repeatedly with the Democratic Congress simply to authorize aid to South Vietnam—no troops, just money.

But the Democrats turned their backs on South Vietnam, betrayed an ally and trashed America’s word. Within a month of Ford’s last appeal to Congress to help South Vietnam, Saigon fell.

The entire world watched as American personnel desperately scrambled into helicopters from embassy rooftops in Saigon while beating back our own allies, to whom we could offer no means of escape. It was the most demeaning image of America ever witnessed, until Britney Spears came along.

Southeast Asia was promptly consumed in a maelstrom of violence that seems to occur whenever these “Jeffersonian Democrats” come to power. Communist totalitarians swept through Laos, Cambodia and all of Vietnam. They staged gruesome massacres so vast that none other than Sen. George McGovern called for military intervention to stop a “clear case of genocide” in Cambodia.

Five years after that, Islamic lunatics in Iran felt no compunction about storming the embassy of what was once the greatest superpower on Earth and taking American citizens hostage for 14 months. To this day, al Qaeda boosts the flagging morale of its jihadists by reminding them of America’s humiliating retreat from Vietnam.

In addition to being wrong about Ford’s pardon of Nixon, liberals were wrong about a few other things from that era. Democrats haven’t admitted error in rejecting Ford’s pleas on behalf of South Vietnam because there are still dangerous foreigners trying to kill Americans. Nixon is safely interred in the ground, but the enemies of America continue to need the Democrats’ help.

 Ya know growing up in the Bay Area did me a huge favor.
It was growing up around in an area overflowing with intellectually damaging liberalism that shaped my conservative politics today.
I watched first hand as these mentally handicapped morons would carry on in their countless protests of one issue or another.
Not to mention watching sick gay activist fucks make fools of themselves marching down the street tonguing and grab assing all for the cause of “civil rights”.
I say fuck San Francisco, pull our federal dollars from the city and let these bunch of degenerate freaks fend for themselves.

*********

Click on Photo to watch latest Vent on this subject

*********

 

Carl Nolte, SF Gate Staff Writer 

Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter vetoed plans to commission the Makin Island, the Navy’s newest and most powerful warship, in San Francisco in 2008 because of a perception that the city is anti-military.

Retired Marine Corps Maj. Gen. J. Michael Myatt, chairman of a high-powered committee that was to support a commissioning ceremony for the Makin Island, said he has been informed that the ship would not be commissioned in San Francisco, as scheduled, but in San Diego.

Myatt said he had been told that the Navy was concerned about San Francisco’s refusal to provide a homeport for the retired battleship Iowa, which would be turned into a museum, and for the city school board’s decision to abolish junior ROTC training in San Francisco high schools.

One of the factors that turned the Pentagon against San Francisco, he said, was widely quoted anti-military remarks made by various city politicians. Some of the remarks got considerable at