politicalpartypoop.com

Found on the blog Ian Schwartz

Maybe because I’m a little tired and a bit out of it today, I’m trying to come up with something to say about this incredible example of liberal stupidity.
This liberal skank, obviously not afraid that her credibility would go into the tank said on Hardball, that Republican “rent a Negro”, Alan Keys won the debate the other day.
This is why these talking pothead political pundit shows are becoming increasingly moronic.
There are a lot of these guests on these shows who are so-called experts but clearly most of them are just warm bodies needed to fill time voids.
Far too many exhibit signs of mental retardation as did this Maddow chick.

If indeed these shows truly want serious dialogue and reputable folks to be on their programs then you should never, EVER see this crazy bitch again on anybody’s show.

CLICK HEAR TO WATCH THE VIDEO

I’m slightly, but guardedly starting to believe that America may indeed survive and not have to endure a Hillary “ worlds smartest woman” Clinton presidency.
I figured long ago that she would have the best and brightest surrounding her and advising her during the campaign. It is increasingly clear she has a bunch of fucken idiots throughout her campaign team.
It’s funny because she can’t fire all of them, she is poised to have a personal meltdown real soon.

JOHNSTON, Iowa, Dec. 13 — On a day when her campaign advisers had hoped the final debate before the Iowa caucuses would help Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton reestablish herself as the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, Clinton offered a formal apology to Sen. Barack Obama and accepted the resignation of a prominent campaign organizer who had raised questions about her rival’s use of drugs.Bill Shaheen, Clinton’s New Hampshire co-chair and the husband of former governor Jeanne Shaheen, said in a statement announcing his resignation that his remarks to The Washington Post on Wednesday were “in no way authorized” by the senator from New York or her campaign.

“I made a mistake,” Shaheen said, adding that it was a “personal decision” to step aside as co-chairman of Clinton’s New Hampshire operation.

Obama advisers were reluctant to let the issue drop, asserting that Shaheen, a close friend of the Clintons, had deliberately put the drug issue into play in the primary in an effort to stem Obama’s rise in early-voting states. In his autobiography, the senator from Illinois acknowledged experimenting with marijuana and cocaine in his younger days.

Even after seeking to play down Shaheen’s comments, Mark Penn, Clinton’s chief strategist, used the word “cocaine” in a television appearance late Thursday. Obama officials seized on it as evidence that the Clinton team was intentionally trying to associate Obama with drug use.

“The issue related to cocaine use is not something the campaign is in any way raising,” Penn said on MSNBC’s “Hardball.”

More from the Washinton Post

This clip has the 411 on all of this stuff…

CLINTON APOLOGIZES TO OBAMA OVER DRUG HIT: Hillary makes it clear there will be no negative personal attacks by her campaign going forward…

Found via Moonbattery

Not all Democrats in Congress bother to be subtle about their hostility toward our culture, and their eagerness to pander to those who share that hostility.A few weeks ago Congress passed a resolution recognizing the brutal terrorist cult Islam as “one of the great religions of the world” and honoring Ramadan. It passed unanimously.

Then came a resolution with similar wording, honoring Christmas, and decrying violence against Christians around the world. Nine Congresskooks were bold enough in their depravity to vote against it:

• Gary Ackerman (D-NY)
• Yvette Clarke (D-NY)
• Diana DeGette (D-CO)
• Alcee Hastings (D-FL)
• Barbara Lee (D-CA)
• Jim McDermott (D-WA)
• Robert Scott (D-VA)
• Pete Stark (D-CA)
• Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)

Ten others voted “present”; here’s a surprise: one of them (Mike Pence of Indiana) isn’t a Democrat.

Presumably all of these characters have more Christians in their districts than Muslims. Whoever they’re representing, it isn’t the misguided voters who put them in office.

On tips from V the K and Cheetah. Hat tip: Michelle Malkin.

Y’all know I’m very much a Republican and I have ranted often about how screwed up Democrats are and why all of us Republicans need to work hard at keeping as many of these Democrat jackasses out of office as possible.

I heard Tom Brokaw on a radio interview talking about how we need to abandon partisan politics and come together in peace and harmony put our political positions aside for the sake of the nation.
Is Tom on crack? Seriously, is there anyone out there reading this post that actually thinks that abandoning YOUR political ideology and core principals is a good thing? And substitute them for what?

Let me tell you, the notion that I could somehow, alter my political leaning to become more “tolerant” of Democrats and their views “for the sake of the nation” is just retarded.

The post above is one of many examples of why I find the majority of liberal Democrats repugnant.
Democrats routinely sacrifice the safety, security and core American values that make this nation great, simply for political gain. Democrats actually take pride in; bashing and maligning our military, attacking core Christian values, catering to elements that actively seek to destroy this nation i.e. wiping the collective asses of radical Islamic types.
Democrats are proficient in promoting race baiting politics, poverty pimping, loathing capitalism; they fight harder to protect American trees rather than the American people, they actually believe we are not taxed enough and they are successful at promoting the notion that they and only they are the champions of promoting civil rights and
Democrats have a perpetual hard on for increasing bureaucracy.

I don’t know about you, but I want Democrats to lose, I want them relegated to the back of the political ideological bus forever.
Tom Brokaw and anyone else preaching this political reconciliation bullshit needs to start paying attention to the stupid shit Democrats say and do every damm day.

Aw damm, I was reluctant to post this, but since Fred 08 put it on their site I guess I’ll flash a little MSM love for Fred.

The fact that this debate was called by some as the most boring, and now have been called by some as the Nurse Ratched debate, (because of that crazy moderator) (more about her here) I don’t know that Fred getting props for his performance is that great. But hey, we will take what we can get.

Chuck Todd: “the candidate who had the best afternoon I think was Fred Thompson”

“The winner: Thompson” (American Spectator, 12/12)

“Winner: Thompson” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“Frankly, the candidate who had the best afternoon I think was Fred Thompson. This was easily his best debate performance and he seemed to shine in this subdued format.” (Chuck Todd, NBC First Read, 12/12)

“Winner: Fred Thompson. Good substance, good personality, and his I won’t raise my hand for an answer question reminded me of Reagan say ‘I paid for this microphone.’ Fred definitely won.” (Right Wing News, 12/12)

“He had the sharpest tone and sounded like a leader” (NBC First Read, 12/12)

“This guy looks like he could eat most of the rest of the field for lunch.” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“Seriously, it’s like Thompson came to the debate in Des Moines today to do two things: Kick butt and chew gum. And it appears he’s all out of gum.” (Mark Hemingway, NRO, 12/12)

“Fred Thompson is easily having his best debate; the format suits him well; it’s very issue oriented and doesn’t allow for too many back-n-forths and gives Fred a chance to shine.” (Chuck Todd, NBC First Read, 12/12)

“Fred the Truth Teller….That’s been his emphasis today, and a compelling one.” (Rich Lowry, NRO, 12/12)

“Fred Thompson was smart, funny, irascible and consistent, and probably helped his standing here.” (Ambinder, The Atlantic, 12/12)

“Judging by This Debate So Far… Romney’s main threat in Iowa should be Fred Thompson.” (Rich Lowry, NRO, 12/12)

“Thompson is sounding like he’s decided this debate’s format stinks, and so he’s going to protest by mocking the mockery it has become. It’s the most life he’s shown in a while.” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“He seems, so far, a bit more rejuvinated than prevous ones.” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“‘I want to take a chance on telling the truth to the American people.’ Very nice line from Fred.”

(Rich Lowry, NRO, 12/12)

“Finally, Fred wakes up and shows a little passion: ‘When the enemies of this country are at the negotiating table, who do you want representing you? Whoever that guy is, that’s the guy you ought to vote for for President.’ One of his stronger moments.” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“Asked for a show of hands on global warming, Thompson finally stands up. ‘I’m not doing any hand shows today.’ A few folks applaud. Fred: You gonna give me a minute to answer it? Moderator: No. Fred: Then I’m not gonna answer it. This gets a smattering of applause. And yup, I’m applauding at home.” (Jim Geraghty, NRO, 12/12)

“NEA…Another ‘good for Fred’ moment.” (Kathryn Jean Lopez, NRO, 12/12)

“‘The biggest obstacle is the NEA’….Another good Fred line…” (Rich Lowry, NRO, 12/12)

“Fred does come off as a sincere, solid man, with good instincts, who you want to see more of on more than Law & Order repeats.” (Kathryn Jean Lopez, NRO, 12/12)

But first my 3 cents!

Yup I know there was a debate, and I don’t give a shit, and I did not even bother reading my trusted blog collection of pundits to decipher the action.Debates are 100% useless, not to mention that it was in Iowa! I’m fucken sick of Iowa.
I’m just dumbfounded that Americans have not more vigorously questioned the validity of the Iowa caucuses. Is there anyone else out there that see this as a huge scam?

In Iowa you have a bunch of people trying to pretend that they are absorbing the information provided by the candidates and that they are “taking their time” deciding. Who are they fucken kidding?
To force the candidates to spend money in Iowa they have to “act” interested.
This Iowa first bullshit is one of the biggest scams in politics.

It is exceedingly unconscionable that the country and the campaign process is being held hostage by a bunch of redneck farmers, figuratively holding the candidates political ballz in their collective hands. “C’mon Hillary, pet my cow or I won’t support you” – “Hey Obama try my road kill meat pie” – “Hey Huck, ya know how to milk a cow, here lemmie show ya.” Stepping through cow manure I guess gives you political vitality.

I’ll be glad when they revamp the presidential election process and stop making these candidates spend millions of dollars in this loathsome meaningless state. This is just bullshit.
The process should be regional, have regional caucuses so the candidates can be allowed to go to multiple states and campaign throughout a time zone for example, to maximize their exposure and better manage their budgets and speaking appearances. Give folks in a number of states the opportunity to take advantage of this campaign cash cow.

Anywho, below is a clip from what I understand was the highlight of what most have called one of the worst and most boring debates in history.

OH! By the way, how the hell did that idiot flunky Nigga Alan Keys sneak his ashy black ass on the stage?
Damm, you white folks manage to keep Niggas away from places where they aren’t invited everywhere else; somebody in security should be fired!

This from the Mother Jones Blog

Scientists recently determined how to make gay fruit flies straight, and vice versa. The findings published in Nature Neuroscience this week conjure up disturbing images of big pharma manufacturing drugs that erase homosexual desire while the religious right markets them.

This discovery makes Gary Greenberg’s “Gay By Choice?” published in Mother Jones in September/October 2007 all the more relevant. The gay rights movement has been hoping science would vindicate it for far too long.

But what if science proves that gayness is not an immutable trait, or worse, finds a way to “cure” it? Isn’t it time, as Greenberg argues, “to find reasons other than medical science to insist that people ought to be able to love whom they love”?

If you woke up one morning and looked in the mirror and saw those images above, I’m thinking if there is a pill to keep me from looking like this I’m takin’ it!

I don’t give a shit if someone is gay, but I have never been able to figure out the whole weird circus clown drag queen fetish gay dudes are so fond of.
What part of the gay DNA makes dudes long for ostentatiously tacky outer wear?
Can that be cured? Just askin…

This from The Washington Post

“The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight … and one of the things they’re certainly going to jump on is his drug use,” said Shaheen, the husband of former N.H. governor Jeanne Shaheen, who is planning to run for the Senate next year. Billy Shaheen contrasted Obama’s openness about his past drug use — which Obama mentioned again at a recent campaign appearance in New Hampshire — with the approach taken by George W. Bush in 1999 and 2000, when he ruled out questions about his behavior when he was “young and irresponsible.”Shaheen said Obama’s candor on the subject would “open the door” to further questions. “It’ll be, ‘When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?’” Shaheen said. “There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It’s hard to overcome.”

Shaheen’s remarks were some of the most direct to date by Clinton campaign officials in addressing the issue of Obama’s past drug use as a potential problem in the general election. This week, the Clinton campaign has been focusing on the broader issue of Obama’s electability, arguing that Democrats would be better off nominating a tested candidate like Clinton.

This is such a bunch of bullshit, here you have this Hillary dickhead flunky calling out Obama on drug use when you know damm well anyone associated with the Clinton campaign past or present, or homies of the Clinton Klan I bet frequently fired up the weed.

You mean to tell me firing up the mean green is not a regular hobby in Democrat circles.
Oh don’t get wrong, high brow Republicans will give you that hypocritical smirk while they spout off about the ill legality of partaking in the ceremonial burning of some Mary Jane. The same people who drown their sorrows in daily Martini or Merlot binges.

Yes I’m sure the Republican drug czars may just try and attack Obama on the issue, certainly a cheap shot, but would not be shocking.
This crap coming from the Hillary camp tho just reeks of incredible desperation. This like everything else in her campaign will bite her in the ass.
Every damm day someone in her campaign come out with some bullshit. She needs to just tell her supporters and staff to “shut the fuck up.”

From the blog Planck’s Constant

The phrase “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” is often used by lazy minds to make moral equivalencies where none exist. You might as well say, “One man’s beef is another man’s chicken.” This last would only be true if you had lousy taste buds or a sloppy dictionary.
When the historical expert Mos Def was last on the Bill Maher show he said, “You know, when the Revolutionary War was going on, George Washington and all them dudes was terrorists…“.

Of course, Mos Def confuses treason with terrorism. As far as the King was concerned, George Washington and his fellow separatists were traitors, not terrorists since the Continental army never attacked civilians, as far as I know, to achieve their political ends.

And since Mos Def gets his info from the local barbershop…

(oh God I almost choked I laughed so hard)

… it is unlikely he ever read the pamphlets of Thomas Paine or he would have read the arguments for separation from England were based on reason and the rights of man and not on violence against innocent women and children. Conflating Islamic terrorists with George Washington as if they operated in the same manner only shows Mos Def’s ignorance of this country’s history and lack of appreciation for the deadly threat posed by Islamic terrorists.

Continue reading “The Difference Between Jewish and Muslim Terrorists” »

Curious article and title considering Bill has been the one fucking up her campaign.
Dude can’t give a speech without mentioning himself a million times.

WASHINGTON - Link- Bubba to the rescue!

Alarmed by his wife’s slide in the polls and disarray within her backbiting campaign, a beside-himself Bill Clinton has leaped atop the barricades and is furiously plotting a cure - or coup.

“She’s in big trouble and he knows it,” a top Democratic operative and Hillary Clinton booster told the Daily News.

Sources familiar with the ex-President’s thinking say he doesn’t believe his wife’s situation is desperate. But he’s unhappy with her operation - once hailed as a juggernaut - and concerned she could lose the Democratic nomination without major alterations in strategy and staffing.

Bill Clinton is mulling “a lot of different ideas and a lot of different scenarios to fix this,” an official who regularly speaks with him said. “He will come up with literally dozens of ideas. The trick will be to figure out the most important one or two to get her out of this downtrend.”

Another Democrat with close connections to the Clinton campaign describes Bill Clinton as “very engaged and very agitated. He’s yelling at [chief strategist] Mark Penn a lot.”

Penn laughed off the idea that he’s on the hot seat. “That’s funny,” he said. “I’ve been working with Bill Clinton through thick and thin for 10 years, exchanging views.”

A source close to the former First Couple criticized recent campaign ads as lacking focus, faulting Penn the most for failing to fine-tune the message: “The key problem is not the spots, but what they’re saying.”

Sources close to the former President say he and the candidate are talking constantly but sharing very little of what they’re discussing with subordinates.

Several other Hillary Clinton partisans, however, aren’t so shy about critiquing the performance of her campaign - and predict a major staff purge is inevitable.

Campaign officials and a source close to both Clintons flatly denied the head-rolling buzz. “Can this change by the end of the week? Yes,” the source said. “But at this point, everyone’s on solid footing.”

Another Hillary Clinton operative told The News, “Nothing will happen until after Iowa,” referring to the Jan. 3 Hawkeye State caucuses. The candidate last night rejected the scuttlebutt.

“These stories are false. I have the best staff in the country, and I have total and complete confidence in them,” she said.

Campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle is the biggest target, sources said. She recently took over personal command of the Iowa operation, and a Clinton defeat there could damage her future.

As Barack Obama has steadily narrowed Hillary Clinton’s once-impregnable lead, friction inside her headquarters has flared. One post-Thanksgiving meeting erupted into finger-pointing over the loss of her advantage.

“They all want to kill each other,” said a source aware of the closed-door meeting.

The backstabbing involves several high-level people in the campaign, including Penn, Mandy Grunwald, Ann Lewis and Howard Wolfson, sources said.

Penn maintained, “It’s a totally false story.”

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton’s campaign abruptly shifted gears Tuesday, arguing Obama can’t beat a Republican. Until now, her attacks targeted Obama’s experience, not his electability.

Pouncing on a report that revealed Obama staked out stridently liberal positions in a 1996 candidate questionnaire, Hillary Clinton’s campaign argued his past record is easy ammunition for the GOP.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton fired back, “For a candidate who 50% of the country says they won’t consider voting for, raising questions about electability is a curious strategy.”

Dude is an attention whore, he wants to be “loved and liked.” He has this major delusion that the entire country is enamored by him so when he goes on the road his speeches always comes back to him.
Now this sort of illusions of grander as far as he is concerned only comes into play when he is around a bunch of sycophant Negros who see him as some sort of messiah.

If I’m controlling the campaign, I would just send his crazy ass to speak to ghetto Negros or speak at Negro colleges where ignorant ass young black chicks would be prone to paw all over him and stroke that massive ego, maybe other stuff as well.

(Oh wipe that look off yo face, you know I’m right, I’m just the only blogger who will say it.)

Here is an interesting discussion this morning on The View and the subject taxes.
Whoopi basically says it bullshit that she can’t leave her “stuff” to her kids without the gubment jacking it (taxing it) again.

Joy (the ultimate bimbo), God this lady is such a retarded fuck, between her and Sherri the I.Q level on that show, not to mention the audience, should apply for gubment intelligence benefits.

Anywho Joy, the typical liberal thinks the Gubment taking your money is ok, shit, she thinks they need to take more!

I love to listen to liberal talk about taxes and the playa hating mentality that goes along with it.
I’m a broke ass median income Negro, and although I would love to have so much money that I could wipe my ass with it, I have never understood the moronic mindset of some liberals who think that it tis perfectly ok for the Gubment to jack your hard earned dollars.

Anywho if your bored and frozen in, watch the clip tis amusing.

Oh the tax 411 below is from Rush’s essential stack of stuff pile, slightly dated, but useful.

This is the data for calendar year 2003 just released in October 2005 by the Internal Revenue Service. The share of total income taxes paid by the top 1% of wage earners rose to 34.27% from 33.71% in 2002. Their income share (not just wages) rose from 16.12% to 16.77%. However, their average tax rate actually dropped from 27.25% down to 24.31%

Think of it this way: less than 3-1/2 dollars out of every $100 paid in income taxes in the United States is paid by someone in the bottom 50% of wage earners. Are the top half millionaires? Noooo, more like “thousandaires.” The top 50% were those individuals or couples filing jointly who earned $29,019 and up in 2003. (The top 1% earned $295,495-plus.) Americans who want to are continuing to improve their lives, and those who don’t want to, aren’t. Here are the wage earners in each category and the percentages they pay:

The top 1% pay over a third, 34.27% of all income taxes. (Up from 2003: 33.71%) The top 5% pay 54.36% of all income taxes (Up from 2002: 53.80%). The top 10% pay 65.84% (Up from 2002: 65.73%). The top 25% pay 83.88% (Down from 2002: 83.90%). The top 50% pay 96.54% (Up from 2002: 96.50%). The bottom 50%? They pay a paltry 3.46% of all income taxes (Down from 2002: 3.50%). The top 1% is paying nearly ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! And who earns what? The top 1% earns 16.77% of all income (2002: 16.12%). The top 5% earns 31.18% of all the income (2002: 30.55%). The top 10% earns 42.36% of all the income (2002: 41.77%); the top 25% earns 64.86% of all the income (2002: 64.37%) , and the top 50% earns 86.01% (2002: 85.77%) of all the income.

This from Riehl World View

Believe it or not, this latest on Huckabee can actually be used to shed light on the Dumond affair and his clemency issues. Think about it.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, asks in an upcoming article, “Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?”

Via Powerline we now know that Huckabee was aware of the impassioned pleadings of several victims of Dumond, yet his heart was not moved, someone involved claimed he was actually arrogant about it. And we also now know that his rationale for abetting the release of a convicted serial rapist and murderer was that said rapist had a jail house conversion.

The file contains 12 letters written by eight different women, three of whom reported being raped or sexually assaulted by Dumond.

What this all suggests is that Huckabee is a you’re with me, or against me type of guy. And the only way to be with Huckabee is to be born again. That may be fine for someone in their private affairs. It is unacceptable for a man seeking to lead a nation comprised of so many different faiths.
The final piece of evidence is the increasing number of revelations as regards his intolerant remarks regarding homosexuals.

Huckabee may be a Christian, but he is far from a tolerant man. And this diverse nation cannot afford such as its President. It simply can’t.

While you’re there also check out: Hillary: Bill???? - Huckabee Finally Mis-speaks?

From Sister Toldjah

The Politico’s Mike Allen and Ben Smith report today that a questionnaire filled out by then-candidate for state Senate Barack Obama (or his campaign manager) back in 1996 notes some solidly liberal tendencies:

When Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was seeking state office a dozen years ago, he took unabashedly liberal positions: flatly opposed to capital punishment, in support of a federal single-payer health plan, against any restrictions on abortion, and in support of state laws to ban the manufacture, sale and even possession of handguns.

Here’s part 1 and part 2 of the questionnaire.

More from the Politico article:

The questionnaire, which was provided to Politico with assistance from political sources opposed to Obama’s presidential campaign, raises questions of whether Obama can be painted as too liberal and whether he is insufficiently consistent.

A week after Politico provided the questionnaire to the Obama campaign for comment, an aide called Monday night to say that Obama had said he did not fill out the form, and provided a contact for his campaign manager at the time, who said she filled it out. It includes first-person comments such as: “I have not previously been a candidate.”

The campaign said his views have been consistent, and points out that his positions have always been more nuanced than can be conveyed in yes-or-no answers.

More of her entry here 

Mormon Mitt on the Today Show…today

Passed-Out Catholic Priest Busted for Crack Cocaine in Pocket

Wanted to post something funny. Besides I missed this episode and can watch while I think of some rants. LOL!

.NATIONAL REVIEW ENDORSES: MITT…

Fucking idiots, my opinion of National Review just went into the toilet.

Mitt Romney, the classic political opportunist, on the abortion alone willing to take one side of a life and death issue when seeking liberal votes and quite willing to take the other side of the same issue when seeking conservative votes.

Mitt Romney at one point in his political career would have to run to the LEFT of Ted Kennedy, who so much symbolizes the catchphrase “big government.”

Romney once stated; “If we are to achieve the goals we share, we must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern,” Romney wrote. “My opponent cannot do this. I can and will.”

Years later, the same liberal Ted Kennedy who actually supports “equality for gays and lesbians” as he has been a forthright backer of gay marriage and an outspoken opponent of the Federal Marriage Amendment. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, made himself the poster boy for conservative opposition to gay marriage, conveniently positioned himself at the geographical epicenter of the debate. The thought of Romney attending a gay pride parade today is unthinkable.

Hypocrisy as far as I’m concerned is an unforgivable sin in American politics. Romney plays this role better than any Republican in the field. From guns, abortion, stem cell research, fidelity to Reagan, tax pledges-all Romney positions reversed, modified, “evolved” or faked.
This is a man adept to faking his views to polish his “conservative” credentials.

If that isn’t bad enough, this jackass even has a change of positions when it comes to his favorite book saying in an interview on national TV that his favorite novel is Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard’s “Battlefield Earth.”
Forget that he told Fox News his favorite book was the Bible but his favorite novel was the science fiction tome “Battlefield Earth.”
On his My Space page the Mark Twain novel “Huckleberry Finn” topped his book list.

Imagine someone so fucked up and lacking in conviction that he can’t even come clean on something as simple as his favorite book.
Frankly I would even question his commitment on his Mormon convictions.

Folks who peep this blog know I’m a Thompson supporter, so this is not just me using my personal format to attack a Thompson opponent. But what I want in a candidate is someone with integrity, someone willing to open the curtain to reveal his or her personal and political convictions AND someone willing to stand resolute by those convictions.

Any true Republican and certainly any true conservative could not possible support Romney.
Like I said National Review in my mind has lost considerable credibility. Romney has deep $$$ pockets and it looks as though National Review has slipped their hands into them.

“they pray on unsuspecting women” Women as victims again…

Ok this is a Today segment from Monday. The segment entitled “The Serial Dater”
is another in a long series of show segments, talk shows, numerous articles portraying men as “playas” “dogs” because they toy with the emotions of vulnerable, unsuspecting, fragile, frail, women.
I just think it tis hilarious, when will we get to the day where women are not always the damm victims of relationships.
Instead of plying the victim role, get smarter when it comes to entering a relationship with a dude.
This dude could not be a successful playa, particularly someone interesting enough to be a segment on the Today Show unless there were not a string of bimbos who 1) bought his bullshit and 2) willingly screwed his brains out.
“oh he will change for me because I can give him what no other woman can”
Pure comic genius! LOL!
Instead of ranting again saying the same ole shit, here is an old post, originally posted in May 07. This post along with a couple of other somewhat related post on women issues has generate the most comments, e-mails of any topic I have ever posted on this blog.

First was a response to me from a commenter about something I had said earlier and them my response to her.

I’m recycling this post AGAIN because of  more recently added comments***

Here is a comment I received on the post: “More issues concerning women”

I’ve always enjoyed your website and your articles until this one. Being a single woman who’s succesful and educated who’s been in dozens of happy healthy relationships with one bad ‘Jarrod’ on my record I found this pretty offensive. There is one big difference between men and women in relationships and that is women don’t want to fail a relationship and men don’t even view break-ups as failures nor do they really take it personally. I found myself in the same situation doing everything to keep my man happy while he was cheating on me and telling me he loved me. I loved him and stupidly thought he’d change for me. Women learn these things as they grow up and through experiences and it’s very unfair for you to lable this woman as someone who is a lunatic and might possibly raise more ‘Jarrods’. I highly doubt she will. The fact that she tried soo hard and still attempts to see good in him tells me that she’s going to take extra precautions to ensure her future son not grow up to be a ‘Jarrod’.
I think your story here should be aiming more towards how men do vs should treat women. Women may not be as ‘emotional’ or ‘psycho’ if they were treated a little better. Maybe you should offer a crash-course is treating women with respect rather than labeling someone as a lunatic who will raise a ‘Jarrod’.

I think it’s funny you blame this completely on the woman as being a lunatic. Do you know her or anything about her outside of an f’ed up relationship with this guy? I’ve been in dozens of very good and healthy relationships that didn’t work out for just general ‘going in different directions’ types of reasons but I’ve also been in ONE relationship just like the one described by this woman above. Being a single woman can be trying in this day for one thing. For two you never want to look into your past and have a ‘failed relationship’ and any woman who is in love will do all of these things and more to try and keep her man happy. Instead of accusing this woman of being a lunatic and potentially raising more ‘Jarrods’ why aren’t you getting down on men for being dogs to women? Why aren’t you getting down on men for taking advantage of women and lying to them? Women get soo emotionally wrapped up in relationships they honestly have no idea how far they’ve gone to keep a man until they finally withdraw themselves from the relationship, take some time and finally reflect on it. At that point they’re probably ashamed of how they behaved, irate they allowed a man to treat them soo terribly and completely jaded from having a healthy relationship anytime soon.

My response

(more…)

BERLIN (Reuters) - German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble launched a verbal assault against the Church of Scientology on Sunday, accusing it in a newspaper interview of trying to secure political power and influence in Germany.

A spokeswoman for Scientology in Germany dismissed Schaeuble’s allegations as “insane”.

Schaeuble and the country’s 16 state interior ministers declared Scientology unconstitutional on Friday, opening the way for a possible ban on the organisation.

“Scientology is also working in Germany to secure political power and influence,” Schaeuble said in an interview with Bild am Sonntag newspaper published on Sunday.

“Fundamental rights, including human rights, like the right to equal treatment and human dignity are limited or abrogated. The democratic system is rejected,” he said.

Schaeuble was referring to the spiritual movement founded in 1953 by U.S. science fiction author L. Ron Hubbard.

Schaeuble and his state counterparts said Germany’s domestic intelligence agencies should continue gathering information on the legality of Scientology’s activities in Germany so that a decision could be made about a possible ban next year.

But German intelligence agencies have been closely monitoring Scientology’s operations for a decade and see little hope of amassing sufficient evidence to justify a ban, Der Spiegel magazine reported in its latest issue.

Germany does not recognise Scientology as a religion and regard it as a cult masquerading as a church to make money.

Read the rest, but why bother, Now I’m a guy who believes in freedom of religion, and maybe Germany is overreacting a bit, but any reasonable individual with a smidgen of common sense know damm well that Scientology is a bunch of lunatic made up bullshit cult crap and one of the most elaborate “religious” scams going.

The fact that people would actually gravitate to this bullshit cult just goes to show you how desperate people are to find comfort in a “god” higher power, spiritual awareness whatever, to mask the pain, emptiness, confusion that goes on in their daily lives.

The fact that idiot wealthy Hollywood types are the most prominent pimps of this cult should raise some serious red flags.

Today Show clip on the topic

---

Sphere: Related Content

Found this on the blog IMAO, great idea, made me laugh! Found via Conservative Grapevine

On Sunday, the Clinton campaign requested the resignation of a second Iowa volunteer coordinator who forwarded a hoax e-mail saying Barack Obama is a Muslim possibly intent on destroying the United States.Is that all it takes to get fired by the Clintons? Forwarding juicy gossip e-mails that paint negative pictures of her political opponents?

Heck, if it’s that easy, I’m thinking we could speed up the process by flaunting temptation in their direction.

So, in your spare time, forward an internet rumor e-mail to your local Clinton campaign office, with some breathless header like “I’ve been a Hillary fan for a long time, but after finding out this information about [political opponent], now I *know* I’m backing the right person for the job of President. Please pass this along to as many other loyal Hillarists as possible!”

If you don’t want to pick on Barack’s Muslimicity, there’s always:

“John Edwards: Neighbor From Hell“

“John Edwards Made My Grandpa Die From the Flu“

“Hillary Clinton - Proudly Marxist, Just Like Me!”

“Obama places hand over crotch during National Anthem“

“John Edwards - Faaaaaabulous!“

Now, I hear some of you doubters saying “this plan would never work! Hillary volunteers are FAR too savvy to fall for obvious right-wing treachery”.

To which I reply, these people are doing unpaid work for a woman with a net worth of $40 million dollars. Figuring out that they’re being suckered is obviously not their forte.

Also check out while you’re there: lolterizt! Part 27 - Ron Paul Doesn’t Translate Well

Oh I almost forgot: John Hawkins has an interview with Fred Thompson’s campaign manager. Peeping around IMAO reminded me. My bad.

This is from Red State - Bill when he said this crazy shit was either on crack or he just had a mind blowing BJ.

I’m beginning to be a bit embarrassed by this continued nonsense that Hillary is somehow this great and brilliant woman.
This blog is not big enough to list all of the great women in this country both in business, politics, executive positions, community leaders, folks just Google the list of the top women executives not to forget the women around the world who are truly making a difference in all of our lives.
Forget my political leanings people; it would be almost impossible for anybody who looked closely at Hillary’s background and determine that she is the “”most gifted” person of our generation!?.” That is simply a criminally insane statement.

Bill Clinton lies like a silk sheet on a waterbed. Well, ok-he IS a silk sheet on a waterbed, but that’s not my point. I’m getting fairly accustomed to his nonsense-the great orator in modern times and all that. But really, MUST I be subjected to this?:

The former president opened a two-day swing through Iowa on behalf of his wife, packing nearly 500 people into a theater on the campus of Iowa State University.”She has spent a lifetime as a change agent when she had the option to do other things,” he said.

“I thought she was the most gifted person of our generation,” said Clinton, who said he told her, “You know, you really should dump me and go back home to Chicago or go to New York and take one of those offers you’ve got and run for office.”

OK-the urge to vomit has subsided…I can continue now.

“Most Gifted” person of our generation? Sorry, Hill…you don’t even come close babes.

Read the rest

From Hot Air Folks, there is a reason why the polls have Crazy Huck in the lead, the MSM is begging that this dude is the Republican nominee.
Some may remember a post where I said many months ago that a prominent blogger told me that Huckabee will become a force in the race, until his liberal government issues and crazy bible thumping rhetoric become public.
This dude said, don’t trust him, he is a nut!
Everything this dude said, even the fact that he will at some point lead in the polls is coming true, it’s almost scary.

Yesterday, Gov. Huckabee admitted that as governor of Arkansas, and indeed because he was governor of Arkansas, he didn’t know much about the decades-long cold war between the United States and Cuba. He wanted the trade embargo on Cuba lifted so that Arkansas could sell rice to Castro’s island prison. Huckabee didn’t seem to be aware of just how bad what he said sounded, that it made him sound ignorant and unqualified for the job he’s currently pursuing. Surely he does remember hearing about Elian Gonzalez, sent back to Castro’s Cuba by Huckabee’s fellow Arkansan, Bill Clinton? The Mareil boatlift? The Cuban Missile Crisis? The Spanish-American War?They do have schools in Arkansas, right? These schools do teach history? Mike Huckabee attended school and learned history at some point in his life? Then there is no excuse for him not to know about the decades-long and continuing cold war between the US and Cuba. No excuse at all.And there is also no excuse for him to flip flop on Cuba just because he’s running for president. His answer regarding this question last night on Hannity & Colmes is refreshingly honest, yet clueless.

I’m a lazy ass this morning, damm Ice storm, dragging out of bed so here are some headlines. I’ll find something to rant about later.
Giuliani now says he wanted to deport all 400,000 illegals from NYC…

First my customary warning to squeamish individuals who may have found my blog accidentally and therefore may have their heads explode after they read my diatribe.

I was thinking, I need to look into writing a book, or at least having some geek help me write one, maybe I can score movie rights and make a few bucks. What would the title be?
The Unapologetic Negro – My attempt at explaining Negro foibles to White America.

I have sat all morning and afternoon trying to come up with something relatively original to try and explain Negros like Andrew Young. How someone who most folks would consider a reasonable and thoughtful individual can spout off to a crowd full of other ignorant Negros and utter the stupid shit he did.

First, of course you must remember, this is the age of You Tube. I don’t care what any MSM journalist, politicians; political pundit says I think that You Tube is the greatest asset to Democracy ever. Simply because ignorant ass people like Young will never,  ever be able to get away with stunning examples of immense ignorance and get away with it.

It is no longer necessary to have some third party interpret stupidity for us, just post their unfiltered ignorance for the masses to digest.

People I said in an earlier post that what Young said is something that my father might say. Any old black dude 60 plus years of age is likely to have his mindset. Old black men are the most racist people on the planet because they (we) have anger and mistrust from every damm body from back in the day.

Let ole Snoop come clean on some prejudice issues.

As a young man I hated Japanese people. I read, I believe in high school, a speech given by the chairman of Toyota (not 100% sure) I know it was the chairman of one of the automobile manufactures where dude said basically that he did not like the idea of building automotive plants in the United States because they would be “forced” to hire blacks. Dude basically said that black people were lazy and corrupt and being forced to hire them would hurt the bottom line.
I carried my hatred towards Japanese people for quite some time, in fact, when I went into the Air Force I lobbied hard not to ever be sent to Japan because I did not want to live near jap folks.

I believed for the longest time the Japanese people were the most xenophobic mutherfuckers on the planet. One of the reasons why I love General Patton so much because he hated and wanted to kill Germans and when he was done he wanted to do the same thing to Japs (as he put it)

Muslims; well I mentioned on this blog an incident in high school where we jumped a bunch of Iranian students for burning the American flag; this was during the Iran hostage crisis.
I also mentioned the first kid I ever knew from a foreign country, Hagope who was from Iraq, I was in the fourth grade, so this was 1973 or so. Anywho this kid would go on and on about how crappy America was, and how stupid American were, all the time living in a kick ass house on the hill above mine, both of his parents were surgeons making big time money, but this kid when I first met him could not complete a sentence without ripping America. You think that was by accident!?

As a result, for years, exaggerated by the flag burning incident in high school I really hated Muslims Middle Eastern folks or anyone who looked like them. None of the earlier terrorists crap perpetrated by Muslims in the 80’s and early 90’s were hardly a shock to me. I said years ago that one day we would be forced into a war with these people. They will be blowing up buildings and reeking havoc here, led by my little friend Hagope.

I honestly carry much of that angst with me today. Remember this started at what age 9 or 10!
This is another reason why it pisses me off when politicians lie about them claiming that they “change their views on issues or people” fucken liars. Except for my extreme repulse for gay men, most of my basic prejudices are still in tact. I’m just completely honest about them.

FYI, my repulse of gays came from my earlier field trips to San Francisco and seeing first hand those gay rights parades first hand and watching these freaks jack each other off in public and do other tasteless shit for public amusement. Trust me when I tell you the parades were far worse back then 70’s and 80’s because at least today to some degree gays in their attempt to become more “mainstream” and not be pegged by intolerant people like me as being sexual freak deviant fucks try to keep that ridiculous behavior in check.

Ah Mexicans, growing up in Oakland, tensions between blacks and Mexicans were always at a fever pitch. Fights between Mexicans and blacks were common.
Mexicans were notorious for jumping blacks to intimidate them into staying out of certain parts of the city.
Until I met a good friend John Giuffre in the Air Force I never had a friend or an acquaintance who was Mexican, I could not stand any Spanish speaking individual.
I had Mexicans say to me back then that we “Americans” took their land from them and their goal was to eventually get it back. Now folks I’m 44 so this current outrage with illegal immigration is just amusing to me, Mexicans have been talking about taking shit over since I was a kid. So the prejudice carries on to some extent.
John use to joke about “we Mexicans are gonna take over, just wait.” I never took it as a joke, as we all know all humor has some semblance of truth behind it.

White people; well my world was torn. When we first moved to our neighborhood in Oakland I had not spent any considerable time around any white people. My first time adventuring out into the hood I came across this little white girl Barbara, she was as curious about me as I was about her. She clearly has never been about any little black boys and asked me questions about everything from my favorite toys to how my hair did that Afro thing. Oh and peep this she even asked did I have to “vacuum” my hair? Seriously, no shit! You white people are so crazy, LOL!

At the time I did not care I was so smitten with her we became best buds. She introduced me to the other kids in the hood, mostly white girls, to the chagrin of the white daddies in the hood.
All invited me into their homes at first; others strangely enough would never invite me into their homes as we grew older.
Some later admitted that their parents did not like black people and some were told not to associate with me, but they never followed their parents’ advice. They were good friends and I enjoyed talking to them I became their little Negro confidant, LOL!

This was my dilemma, the majority of my friends in those early days were white, and I’ll admit something else, the major reason why most of my friends were white was because they never asked me for anything. We shared, our toys, our candy and friendship, we had conversations about all kinds of stuff. Even about the racism stuff I and other black kids who would slowly populate the school experienced.

I started to live in two worlds, I would visit my black friends who lived on the other side of Mills College (at that time an all girl’s college) and when I wanted to remain close to home I hung with the white kids. Some other black kids would enter the circle of friends but they were noticeable uncomfortable being around white kids.
Some use to say, “my dad would kill me if he caught me in a white girls house.”

But even back then, damm near every black kid who came to my house would always ask for something, “got anything to eat?” “can I borrow your records?” (45’s, albums for the old style technology ignorant) “got any money?” It wasn’t like these mutherfuckers came from the ghetto or were poor, but they damm sure were prolific about asking for shit.
Most of the black folks I dealt with as a kid always wanted something; it wasn’t until I met my good friends while in the Air Force that I met black folks that were smart, thoughtful, true friends not a bunch of needy mutherfuckers.
This is why so many black folks make good Democrats.

Now my father would not forbid me from entering a white person’s house but he always advised extreme caution. He would say to me “don’t give these white folks a reason to call the police on you, cause they will do so in a minute”

I along with my middle brother were the perfect little Negro kids. I would help the moms carry in groceries and thank them for making me lunch and complement them on their cookies. My brother Chris was busy mowing lawns for some of them, and was even asked to baby-sit one of my friends. In fact this family the Bauer’s named their new son Christopher because they liked my brother so much.
We were polite, well behaved, respectful, non threatening.
Our yard was well maintained to white standards and no loud James Brown music could be heard coming from our home, LOL!

I worked on keeping the good Negro perception because of what my father told me the first day I went to school in Oakland. “Unfair or not, you have to be the representative for black folks because many of these white kids have never been around black kids, their first and only impressions of black people may be a result of how you act and conduct yourself.” Not exactly the quote but damm close.
Others I have told this too just cringe at the notion that my father would put that kind of burden on me, but folks as a man of I dare say again 44, my father was correct.

Ok Snoop, bla, bla, bla what does this have to do with Young?
I was fortunate, my being able to slip in and out of the white world taught me a valuable lesson in how to deal with people and how I should deal with people on a person by person basis. None of these political victim filters that even someone as well known as Andrew Young suffers from.

Although I am a ranting bastard, and still hold some deep seeded prejudices all based on my experiences I relished the thought of learning from the new folks I encountered.
I was able to put away my narrow-minded oh woe is me simple Negro mindset.

I dare say that Andrew Young being a former U.S. Ambassador and someone who has participated in far more meaningful stuff that I, a whole host of interesting stuff in his career has STILL never been able to shake his old world Negro hostility towards white folks and see them as tools for Negros to use rather than colleagues and individuals who may or may not have good intentions when it comes to dealing with black folks.

Too many of these old guard black folks still see themselves as sitting in the back of the proverbial mental bus. This is why black folks who proclaim themselves to be Republicans or I dare say Conservatives are such an enigma to most of these old dog Negros.

Still far too many black folks think that we all us black folks need to belong to this imaginary “team.” Find some well meaning white person and ride the plantation wagon with them to success are prosperity, usually a Democrat (Bill and Hillary after all they are black).
Obama can’t be that individual because his plantation wagon is not ready for the road; it is not ready to take on the rigors of the rough road necessary for black politicians to succeed.

What Young said to these folks was all too typical of what many old black folks say in private. They are enamored by the star political and economic power Negro Bill and Hillary represent and they want a piece of the action. Bill and Hillary is one of us, they will “hook us up” needy Negros!

However Young as are many old dudes still have not been schooled in the era of You Tube, and that you better be careful when divulging the old world Negro secrets to American success and prosperity.

However, despite Young’s ignorance, politics reflect the times, and the times, they are a-changin’. Increasingly, blacks are beginning to realize there is another truth about Negros loyalty to Democrats: It hasn’t been a resounding success.

Because the light is being shed on this type of Negro ignorance, Democrat Negro poverty pimps like Young are looked at with more scrutiny. You folks were never privy to this type of illogical nonsense. I can here some of you, “ah so that is why some black folks are fucked politically, they listen and absorb this lunacy.

The word that Democrats simply take most ethnic group, more notably black folks for granted shows signs of catching on.
I believe the ideological momentum is shifting to the right. As more people, particularly young blacks are exposed to more and more black intellectuals like Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams and John McWhorter, Larry Elder, they will come to understand why the ignorance of people like Young are so divisive and detrimental to the success of blacks everywhere.
Despite al of Young’s experience and opportunities he still leads the charge in what is known in some circles as the ‘victicrat’ mindset.

I see the airing of Young’s ignorance as a positive thing. I am (as of the time I bang this out on a keyboard) still curious as to what the other black rednecks will say about this.
I have searched high and low all day and not found jack. Negros are mysteriously silent, I guess they don’t want to bash a civil right icon too severely or will simple just hope it blows over.

So why do some black folks say stupid shit, well you white folks are not suppose to be paying attention, it’s a black thang Mr. Young would say, for black consumption only!!

From the Blog California Yankee

Hillary has earmarked more than $2.3 billion in federal appropriations for projects in her state:

Since taking office in 2001, Clinton has delivered $500 million worth of earmarks that have specifically benefitted 59 corporations. About 64% of those corporations provided funds to her campaigns through donations made by employees, executives, board members or lobbyists, a review by the Los Angeles Times shows.[. . .]

Clinton is not the biggest earmarker in Congress; senior congressional leaders and members of the appropriations committees can and do write many more such provisions into the huge spending bills they draft. But Clinton does significantly more earmarking than most others with her relatively low level of seniority.

Read the rest