VIEW MY LATEST SLIDE SHOW

VIEW THE OBAMA COLLECTION

VIEW MY HILLARY COLLECTION

VIEW MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY COLLECTION





Archive for December, 2007

Shelby Steele On White Guilt, The Obama Phenomenon

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

whiteguilt.jpg

From Jeremayakovka
Watch Video Here

Steele’s …Why Obama Can’t Win — the book; the interview
What I said before: Left Obsessed with Obama’s Blackness…but I feel like ranting!



Found this on Hot Air : Video: ABC’s Chris Cuomo plays the race card with Barack Obama

Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama appeared on Good Morning America today. Most of the interview consisted of standard boilerplate political fare, but GMA host Chris Cuomo asked Obama one question that says more about Cuomo’s beliefs than anything else. He asked Obama what is the greater obstacle for him in the presidential contest, Hillary’s political machine or “America’s inherent racism.” Nice. To his credit, Obama doesn’t pick up the card and play it himself.

Sphere: Related Content

Shocker: Hillary Faked A Tender Moment

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

hillfake.jpgFrom Sweetness & Light

Clinton gets “surprise” visit from Sunday school teacherDONNELLSON, Iowa (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton got a surprise visit from her past today.

At a stop in Donnellson, someone asked about her faith. Clinton said she’s a practicing Methodist.

Someone then pointed out that Clinton’s childhood Sunday school teacher was in the audience.

Clinton rushed over to hug her teacher, Rosalie Bentzinger.

Bentzinger gave Clinton a picture of the New York senator’s confirmation class from 1959.

Campaign aides say they were unaware that Bentzinger, who was with a friend of Clinton’s, was in the crowd.

Someone had to “point her out”? Hillary couldn’t remember her teacher from having seen her again just a few months ago?

From WireImage:

Read the rest

Sphere: Related Content

Neo-Nazis have deep pockets, pimping for Ron Paul

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

ronpaul08.jpgFound this on Wonkette, made me laugh!

Despite all the trumpeting of (and spamming about, and commenting on) Ron Paul’s money-making tea party last weekend, it turns out that, somehow, Ron Paul needs all the money he can get. So while Obama and Edwards openly turn away contributions from lobbyists and everyone else seemingly finds a way to send back money from those they find personally distasteful, Ron Paul’s campaign has confirmed that they will keep the $500 donation from Don Black of the neo Nazi pig fucker website Stormfront. Because, as spokesman Jesse Benton said, that’s $500 more for Ron Paul and $500 less for neo Nazi pig fuckers that want to see Ron Paul elected. Um, Jesse? The standard thing to do, for both Republicans and Democrats caught with money with the stench of pig-fucking on it, is to donate it to a charity. Can we recommend some? The NAACP, or the Anti-Defamation League, or the Southern Poverty Law Center? I’d bet they’d do at least equally well spreading “the message of freedom” and making sure that the pig fucker had $500 less dollars. Not that you, you know, actually care. I just thought I’d make a suggestion. [Washington Post]

I have not said anything about Ron Paul in awhile, I figure why alienate my Ron Paul homies because hopefully they will come to their senses and get behind a real candidate Fred Thompson.

Despite raising a record number of dead presidents in one day, Ron Paul has a snowballs chance in hell of surviving past a couple of primaries.
This post points out what I said long ago, Paul obviously does not give a shit about PR.
Accepting money from Neo-Nazi fucks is perfectly ok with him.
I’m just wondering Ron Paul fans, particularly those of you who have given money to the campaign, does it not occur to you that for every dollar Ron Paul accepts from these racist fucks, three gets pissed away because of the negative publicity. Basically lost credibility costs you money in a campaign and you can’t get that back.
Paul’s campaign is still scoffed at by most observers, because these links to Neo-Nazis won’t go away. I won’t mention his woeful debate performances. YUK

Maybe he sees the handwriting on the wall, knows he is out of it so he is simply trying to stay somewhat relevant and is trying to hold on to the cheers and accolades of his supporters for as long as he can. So who cares where the dollars come from.
Because once he drops out of the race he will disappear into the political haze like so many other failed politicians.

At least he will be able to use some of the money to take some cool vacations, buy himself a nice red sports car or buy himself a shit load of lap dances.

BAD SNOOP! LOL! Oh get a sense of humor people!



Vanguard News Network, the leader of the American National Socialist Workers Party says Ron Paul Lies About Lack Of Involvement With White Nationalists.

Ron Paul Lies About Lack Of Involvement With White NationalistsComrades:

I have kept quiet about the Ron Paul campaign for a while, because I didn’t see any need to say anything that would cause any trouble. However, reading the latest release from his campaign spokesman, I am compelled to tell the truth about Ron Paul’s extensive involvement in white nationalism.

Both Congressman Paul and his aides regularly meet with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review, and others at the Tara Thai restaurant in Arlington, Virginia, usually on Wednesdays. This is part of a dinner that was originally organized by Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis and Joe Sobran, and has since been mostly taken over by the Council of Conservative Citizens.

I have attended these dinners, seen Paul and his aides there, and been invited to his offices in Washington to discuss policy.

For his spokesman to call white racialism a “small ideology” and claim white activists are “wasting their money” trying to influence Paul is ridiculous. Paul is a white nationalist of the Stormfront type who has always kept his racial views and his views about world Judaism quiet because of his political position.

I don’t know that it is necessarily good for Paul to “expose” this. However, he really is someone with extensive ties to white nationalism and for him to deny that in the belief he will be more respectable by denying it is outrageous — and I hate seeing people in the press who denounce racialism merely because they think it is not fashionable.

Bill White, Commander
American National Socialist Workers Party



“Ron Paul disavowed any racist support on the PBS NOW interview.”

Sphere: Related Content

Edwards on infidelity

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Shop at Zales….

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Damm this Edwards affair mess has been bubbling for awhile. Who knew!

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Will another Democrat be screwed allowing his dick to run his life?

edwardsbimbo2.jpg

edwardsbimbo1.jpg

Blog Watch on this:

Doug Ross and Death by 1000 Papercuts

Ace of Spades

From Right Wing News  - What the tabloid’s readers, in politics and out, may not know is that a key owner of the Enquirer is a prominent New York investment banker and one of Hillary Clinton’s key backers, Roger Altman. Altman was an official in the first Clinton administration, and his name is often mentioned as a possible Clinton Treasury Secretary.

The investment boutique which Altman founded and chairs, Evercore Partners, bought a controlling stake in American Media, which publishes the Enquirer, in 1999, which it still holds with a partner. Evercore’s president, Austin Beutner, sits on American Media’s Board of Directors, according to Evercore’s website.

 MoJoBlogMarc Ambinder, Outside The BeltwayTim Worstall Tabloid Edition, The Daily Dish, THE REACTIONRiehl World View, Vox Popoli and Fausta’s blog


Found on the Huffington Post from September 2007: Edwards Mystery: Innocuous Videos Suddenly Shrouded In Secrecy

In the summer of 2006, former North Carolina Senator John Edwards commissioned a series of web-based documentary shorts for his pre-announcement leadership PAC, the One America Committee. Within political circles, the videos were regarded as innovative, having successfully painted Edwards in a sympathetic, down-to-earth light.Now, however, nearly all traces of the webisodes - as they became known - are gone. Links to them on the Internet no longer work. The Edwards campaign won’t release the videos, and the production company behind the films is citing confidentiality agreements in refusing to talk.

This closed-off approach naturally aroused my interest. In the world of politics, rare is the candidate who passes on a chance for publicity. The campaign’s explanation for stonewalling, moreover, struck me as dubious and at times evasive.

I had come to the Edwards’ videos in a haphazard way: the byproduct of a story I was writing on new technology and politics. The webisodes were not, in any regard, a secret. Edwards’ “behind the scenes” portrait had earned rave reviews in the blogosphere and even a small feature in Newsweek. But nothing had been written about the films since Edwards announced his presidential aspirations, and I wanted to know how the footage would play on the campaign trail.

What followed was a lesson in the profound irritations of political reporting. A call to Edwards’ press shop led to an email to his One America Committee representative, which led, in turn, to a mind-bending exchange about campaign finance law, which culminated in a separate conversation with Edwards’ deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince. Each time I was told that the One America Committee could not use “material that could be considered promoting the presidential campaign,” and that Edwards’ camp “no longer had access to most of the content.”

Thwarted, I tried my hand with the movie’s producers. A search for the filmmaker, Rielle Hunter, proved that Google does, in fact, have its limitations. No hits. The same held true with Facebook and Myspace - a bizarre level of anonymity for someone in the movie business.

The production company responsible for the webisodes, Midline Groove Productions, had a minimalist website. Through it, however, I was able to email Mimi Hockman, Rielle Hunter’s partner, to ask if I could screen the tapes. She directed me to a Business Week website where the last remaining webisode link still functioned. But beyond that, I was rebuffed. Once again, the reasons seemed strangely artificial.

“Our contract expired last year,” Hockman emailed, “and the Edwards camp owns all of the webisodes and footage.”

(Hmmm…. The campaign had said it couldn’t access the footage.) Could we at least talk off the record about the filming process?

“Nope,” she wrote. “Not a chance.”

My reportorial curiosity thoroughly piqued, I decided to dig further.

Who is Rielle Hunter? The Newsweek item said Edwards met the aspiring actress and filmmaker in a New York City bar. A call to the Screen Actors Guild elicited the following exchange:

Screen Actors Guild: “This performer chooses not to list her contact information in the membership database.”

HuffPost: “So if I wanted to contact her about her work with web video?”

SAG: “Well, I don’t know what to tell you. It’s up to the performer to choose whether they are listed or not.”

A check of the movie database IMDB.com listed her as a director and actor in the short Billy Bob and Them. And an Internet write up of a 2005 interview she apparently gave to Breathe Magazine described her as a “formerly hard-partying girl who claims that she found enlightenment.”

How much did the videos cost? According to campaign finance reports, the One America Committee made four payments of $12,500 and two of $25,000, for a total of $100,000 to Midline Groove Productions in the second half of 2006.

If you don’t have shit else to do check this out: Scrubbed: Edwards Filmmaker’s Deleted Website Raises Questions or

 John Edwards’s Docudrama: The Anatomy of Innuendo

Here is a bit of the post: I know y’all have heard “where there’s smoke….” Hmmm Juicy!

October 10, 2007. The National Enquirer reports that Edwards is having an affair with a mystery woman who had traveled with the campaign and met the candidate at a bar. An Edwards rep calls the allegations “false, absolute nonsense.”

• October 10, 2007. That same day, Stein posts a follow-up to his original Huffington Post piece. He questions why Rielle Hunter’s production company was paid upwards of $100,000 for her work, and points out that she used to be a party girl who dated writer Jay McInerney in the eighties and inspired the main character in his book Story of My Life.*

October 10, 2007. Ann Coulter, late in the day, mentions the Enquirer story on Tucker Carlson’s MSNBC talk show. Daily Kos once again picks up on it and lists the reasons why Stein and the Huffington Post are irresponsible journalists for digging into it.

October 11, 2007. Mickey Kaus on Slate writes a post headlined “Emerging Edwards Scandal?” in which he notes the previous coverage, mulls what would happen to Edwards’s campaign if the story were true, especially since he’s been “tacitly and effectively used Elizabeth and her struggle” with cancer (the struggle with cancer no doubt being a large part of why the “mainstream media seems to be strenuously trying to not report it”), and wonders who might benefit. Obama?

October 11, 2007. Jezebel.com doesn’t mince words, with a headline that screams, “Is John Edwards Cheating on His Cancer-Stricken Wife?” “Who the fuck sleeps with a married man whose wife has terminal cancer and THE ENTIRE WORLD FUCKING KNOWS ABOUT IT?”

October 11, 2007. Washington, D.C., gossip blog Wonkette.com picks up on the Enquirer story, too. After Ann Coulter (who once called John Edwards a gay slur) mentions it, they query: “But, um, Ann? Why would Edwards have a lady-affair when he’s a ‘faggot’?”

Watch mystery video - You Tube Link - http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=MissingVideos

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Rush to Judgment

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

rodham2.jpgBy Maureen Dowd, New York Times

One of my male colleagues was explaining why men age better than women.“It’s evolutionary,” he said. “As we wear out our wives, who are running around taking care of the kids, we know we’re going to have to get another younger wife, so we stay good-looking.”

He was kidding. (I think.) We were discussing Hillary’s latest hurdle: the Old Hag routine.

When men want to put down a powerful woman in a sexist way, they will say she’s a hag or a nag or a witch or angry or hysterical.

First, the Republicans tried to paint Hillary as angry, but that didn’t work because she has shown a steady composure and laughed a lot (even if the laughter isn’t always connected to people saying anything funny). She has kept her sense of humor — which has a tart side — mostly under wraps, so she won’t be accused of being hillold1.jpgwitchy.

But some conservative pundits who disagree with a woman on matters of policy jump straight into an attack on the woman’s looks or personal life.

And so the inevitable came to pass this week when Rush Limbaugh began riffing about an unflattering picture of Hillary in New Hampshire that Matt Drudge put up on his Web site with the caption, “The Toll of a Campaign.”

“So the question is this,” the radio personality said. “Will this country want to actually watch a woman get older before their eyes on a daily basis?”

Observing that Hillary is stuck with a looks-obsessed culture and that the presidency ages its occupants, including W., Limbaugh observed that “men aging makes them look more authoritative, accomplished, distinguished. Sadly, it’s not that way for women, and they will tell you.”

And Hillary, he noted, “is not going to want to look like she’s getting older, because it will impact poll numbers, it will impact perceptions.” So, he added, “there will have to be steps taken to avoid the appearance of aging.”

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

Pro Huck clip, Humor

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Ok, y’all know I’m not a Huck supporter, but this is pretty good, I’ll always gives props to a clip that makes me laugh.

Sphere: Related Content

Endorsement bullshit

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

toon6.pngAh crap Snoop needs something to bitch about. Yes people I’m checking out some news stories and blog posts on some political endorsements and I’m becoming a little cranky because I’m just incredulous that candidates are falling all over themselves, (like Hillary beaming because of the Des Moines Register’s endorsement of her campaign) over these celebrity and editorial board ego strokes.

I realize y’all that I may be a little slow not fully comprehending the magnitude that a celebrity blessing can provide. Yes, this may stroke the ego of some candidates but can an individual voter be influenced because of a particular endorsement by a “noteworthy” person of interest?
Who Cares that Barbra Streisand endorsed Hillary, or that Oprah Winfrey endorsed Obama, or the Boston Globe editorial board loves Obama, or the New York Times loves Hillary.
Ah but the big celebrity endorsements have not begun to roll in just yet. I fucken can’t wait to hear who super skanks like Lindsay Lohan, Brittany Spears or Paris Hilton will back for president.

I may be wrong, but I doubt it, but the only people I can think of who would give a shit about these political pat on the backs are primarily political junkies, habitual newspaper readers and the candidates themselves.

I find it a wee bit odd that while newspapers continue the tradition of endorsing one political candidate or another, you don’t see other media stepping out to voice an opinion.
It would be somewhat interesting what candidate would be chosen by most of the major news outlets. Who do you think FOX News would endorse for President? What about Brian Williams or Keith Olberman? Yes the obvious pimping of some retard liberal would result but how many dead presidents would it take to nail down a NBC Nightly News presidential blessing.

Now I understand that celebrities, like the rest of us, have the right to their opinion, and can state who they wish to vote for, and so forth, but once they take that extra step and begin joining someone in a campaign, then they are just using their name and star power to try and get votes, and by definition, meaning not focusing on the issues at hand.

Oprah said as she announced her backing of Obama “I’m sick of politics as usual,” Winfrey also said. “We NEED Barack Obama.”
Ok, that’s nice. But frankly I don’t give a fuck what Oprah Winfrey says I NEED. Besides how does she fucken know “what I need?” Can you begin to process the utter arrogance of Ms. Winfrey?

Hey Oprah, peep this; what I give a fuck about is what Barack Obama has to say, and what his positions are on various issues. What would he do about illegal immigration? What about his comments saying he would attack targets in Pakistan without consent? What about the hundreds of other things that take importance over what Oprah Winfrey says?

I just find annoying as hell that these bullshit endorsements are the biggest talk around during such an important campaign. Cheap gimmicks (floating cross, hint hint) and big name endorsements, hey Oprah, get a fucken clue, THAT would be politics as usual.

Besides most of these big name celebrities tend to lean toward Democrats, but wait, ole Chucky Norris, both a Christian and Conservative by the way, came out in one of his commentaries supporting former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. Since that time, Huckabee has squeezed it for all its worth, with Norris appearing in ads for Huckabee, and is now traveling with him. He even went to the CNN You Tube debate and got quite a lot of attention.

But again why? And who cares?

This is what makes Americans even more disconnected with the political process than to support celebrities standing up and saying “vote for him because we need him,” rather than looking into things themselves, which is a rarity among the majority of the population unfortunately.

It seems as though this woefully lazy and ignorant voting public consumed by the more pressing aspects of life figure hey, I’m too busy to give a shit where the candidates stand on issues. If someone like Oprah likes Obama he must be a good dude.
But someone like Chucky Norris, seriously people, do we really need a mediocre actor and lame internet sensation pushing for a political candidate? What makes them more qualified about politics than other people?
Again the same can be said of newspaper editorial boards, hack political pundits or former failed politicians.

Oh wait let’s not forget our man Ron Paul’s endorsement….from a pimp. Nevada brothel owner Dennis Hof was so impressed with Ron Paul he even decided to raise money for him.
In a glaring example of political endorsements that can screw you, having fucktards like 9/11 “truthers” and former KKK member and rabid antisemite David Duke pimping for you can certainly have some impact I would guess.

Maybe it’s just me ranting, but question for y’all. Would you have Oprah choose your husband or wife, or Chuck Norris deciding what home you should buy, or the editorial board of a newspaper deciding on your financial investment portfolio, of course not.
But Snoop that’s just silly, these are important personal matters.
 Hmmm, then electing an individual to lead this nation is not important? Silly me, all of this campaigning crap, hundreds of millions of dollars raised, countless hours volunteering for, endless coverage on TV, millions of articles written about something as unimportant as a presidential campaign. My bad, I thought you folks gave a damm, silly Snoop. LOL!

Sphere: Related Content

Are you listening? Fred! Will. Not. Pander.

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

fred.jpgThis from The Society of Independent Thinking

A lot of media people and a couple of special interest groups are not all that fond of Fred Thompson. Fred’s most recent media smackdown, in which he informed a moderator that he would not be “doing any hand-shows today” surely did not endear him to the Des Moines Register. Although, judging by the way she moderated the debate, I’d be willing to bet there are many on the School Marm’s staff who have links the the YouTube vid of this moment saved on their home favorites list.Bill O’Reilly doesn’t like Thompson because he’s reportedly asked him “six times” to come on the O’Reilly show. Fred essentially responded by saying he was too busy (which pompous blowhard O’Reilly took to mean ‘lazy’). Thompson instead invited O’Reilly to join him on the campain trail — at least 15 times. O’Reilly got his revenge for this slight on his ego by subtracting Fred from his recent poll regarding GOP favorites. Pretty infantile, Bill. I mean that.

Grover Norquist, as I mentioned here another time, also dislikes Thompson because of a slight on his ego. Anyone sensing a pattern?

And, of course, there’s the AP dog-and-pony show, wherein they ask the candidates stupid yearbook questions, instead of dealing with substance. Thompson’s responses, while certainly not pleasing to the AP (that is, they wouldn’t have been had the AP gotten the joke) were sure-fire crowd-pleasers to those of us who understood where Thompson was coming from:
What’s your favorite joke? Presidential debates.

What’s your favorite keepsake? Trophy wife.

What’s your favorite nickname? Mr. President.

And, of course, there’s my new favorite poke in the eye: What do you like to do on a ‘lazy day’? Campaigning.

Note to Associated Press: we’re electing the Leader of the Free World — not choosing the next American Idol. Thompson understands this, and gives these idiotic questions all the attention they deserve, while simultaneously taking some well-deserved shots back at the press.

Fred Thompson does not pander. He doesn’t pander to special interest groups, and he doesn’t pander to the media. Why? Because the President is not beholden to lobbyists or reporters. He is beholden to the American People.

Fred Thompson is a man who respects the Presidency. He respects the job, and he respects the office. He does things his way, and his way is to maintain the dignity of the White House, and of the United States. People can complain that he doesn’t do things their way, and that’s all right. But he’s not out there to please the pundits by jumping through particular hoops.

Frankly, I can respect the opinion of somebody who has thoroughly gone through the white papers and policy recommendations of the candidates, gets to know them on the issues, and chooses not to vote for Fred. I don’t agree with them, but I respect them. I have no respect at all for people who refuse to vote for a man because he won’t demean the office of the Presidency by pandering. You want pandering, go vote for a Democrat, or watch American Idol. If you’re interesting in picking the best person for the job of President of the United States, brush up on policy, learn about the individuals.

Thompson is, and remains, a Conservative leader and, I humbly submit, the absolute best choice for President.

Sphere: Related Content

???????????????????????????????????

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

ne.jpg

Sorry Mike!

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

The Moonbattery Report

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

moonbat2a1.JPG

A few things to check out on Moonbattery



DC Building Deemed Too Ugly to Demolish
A Washington congregation is not permitted to demolish or even alter their own crumbling church precisely because it is hideous.
*
Global Warming Hysteria Is Leading to Food Shortages
Environmental extremism, potentially the worst threat facing civilization, is already resulting in food shortages. Shamelessly, the moonbat media uses this crisis to promote the same global warming hoax that caused it.
*
Moonbat Minister Says Jesus Was a Communist
While some liberals try to suppress Christianity at Christmastime, others try to hijack it for their own unholy ends. WaPo’s Religion Watch includes a short review of The Scandalous Gospel of Jesus by publicly homosexual minister Peter Gomes of Harvard.

Sphere: Related Content

New Fred Thompson Video: Kill the terrorists. Protect the border. Punch the hippies

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

Found this on Wizbang, who found it on Right Wing News. Unofficial Fred Thompson ad, but I love it. Finally found something to pick up the mood a bit today.

Sphere: Related Content

Romney attended Planned Parenthood house party in 1994

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

While trolling some liberal blogs I found this from the blog Blue Mass Group

romneypp.JPG

BMG has obtained a photograph showing Mitt Romney at a house party to benefit Planned Parenthood that was held in June of 1994, during his campaign for US Senate against Ted Kennedy.  And, BMG has learned, Ann Romney’s $150 check to Planned Parenthood that was in the news a few months back was related to this event.

In case you forgot; ABC quoted [Romney spokesman Kevin Madden] as saying that “[t]he governor has not donated to Planned Parenthood or abortion-rights groups.”

Read the rest here, y’all already know what I think about this fraud ass!

Sphere: Related Content

Revisiting the Clinton Record

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

polygraph.jpg 

John Hawkins: 14 Questions I’d Ask Hillary After I Hooked Her Up to a Lie Detector

Journalist Says Internet Must be Regulated for Fraud

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

mediabias.JPG

More from Rush, amazing

There is a journalist by the name of David Hazinski. This guy’s a journalism professor, a former journalist, journalism professor at some out-of-the-way college.Here it is: He’s an associate professor of telecommunications and head of broadcast news at the University of Georgia’s Grady College of Journalism, University of Georgia journalism professor. He says: “Unfettered ‘Citizen Journalism’ Too Risky” YouTube, blogs, unregulated, it’s too risky. They gotta get rid of this stuff.

Article link here

He thinks that regulation is the only way to have proper news. He thinks in this piece — it’s the Atlanta Urinal-Constipation on the 13th of December — he says that citizen journalism, like blogs or YouTube, isn’t really journalism, it opens the industry to “fraud and abuse,” as though there is no fraud and abuse!

NBC didn’t blow up the trucks for Dateline NBC. ABC didn’t dress people up like Muslims and send them into a pack of Christians and hope for the best. No, no, no! There’s no fraud and abuse in the Drive-Bys. CBS didn’t have Dan Rather on. Those fraudulent documents? Of course not, Mr. What’s Your Name — Hazinski.

No fraud and abuse in the Drive-Bys. Why do you think the New Media is rising? Because your precious journalism industry is crashing. Nobody trusts it! Well, more and more people don’t trust it. So, a typical lib: Rather than letting the public decide what they want to read or watch, the better idea is to regulate! Monitor and regulate this new industry, the Internet and blogs. Does “regulate” sound like a “mandate” to you? Regulate health care, mandate health care.

This professor wants what he considers to be the legitimate journalism outlets to find a way to regulate citizen journalism. This would include political blogs, which is basically what my website is, RushLimbaugh.com, except I’m not a journalist, but he wants to regulate it.

By the way, CNN is now using blogs. All the Drive-Bys are trying to incorporate YouTube and all these blogs. They’re having bloggers on as analysts. The genie is out of the bottle, Mr. Hazinski.

Sphere: Related Content

I missed this…

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

obamachar2.jpgFrom Rush: Did you hear what former Senator Bob Kerrey had to say about Obama? He said, “I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and that his father was a Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim,” Bob Kerrey said to the Washington Post.

After the Clinton campaign says, “We’re going to get rid of all these kind of references to his being a Muslim and drug dealer and all this,” here comes Bob Kerrey using the middle name! I keep getting accused of calling him “Osama Obama.” Ted Kennedy called him that! We just made a joke out of it in the parody, but Ted Kennedy called him that in answer to a question at the National Press Club.

“There’s a billion people on the planet that are Muslims, and I think that experience is a big deal,” Bob Kerrey said.

The New York Post headline is this: “Kerrey’s Praise of Barack a Big O-Bombo.”

Sphere: Related Content

Redefining Conservatism

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

rep.JPGDES MOINES, Iowa–Stepping out for a press conference here Monday, Mike Huckabee fielded the ultimate question. Just how conservative are you?”I’m as conservative as anyone could hope to be, or want to be, or needs to be,” replied the smiling former Arkansas governor, never missing a beat, and following up with a boilerplate summary of his belief in “lower taxes,” the “sanctity of human life” and a “strong military”–before moving ever so swiftly on to the next question.

It was trademark Huckabee: Sounds great, explains little. It’s a strategy that has so far served him well, rocketing his campaign in recent weeks to the top ranks of the Republican presidential field. The question is whether he can continue to pull off that trick, now that he’s receiving belated media scrutiny. A few days following the candidate on the Iowa campaign trail suggests it could prove tough. If Mr. Huckabee does turn out to be everything Republicans “want” or “need” in a conservative, it will only be because the definition of a conservative has morphed to include tax hiking, protectionism, corporate scolding and an unserious approach to foreign policy.

What aren’t in doubt are Mr. Huckabee’s social-values credentials. He has an undisputed record on questions of abortion and gay marriage, and he’s spent no small portion of his limited advertising money making sure Iowa voters know it. Christian conservatives make up an estimated 40% of the state’s GOP vote, and by all accounts he’s slowly locking up that vote. That alone accounts for a fair share of his recent rise in the polls.

Mr. Huckabee is the charisma candidate. Like another man from Hope, Ark., the onetime pastor is an extraordinary speaker. He’s self-deprecating and funny, has perfect timing, and never struggles for an answer. He has that rare ability to pull out just the right story in response to any situation, and to deliver it in a folksy, Southern way.

Read the rest of this article here, but let me first just say this; Folks I’m angry, as angry as someone can be on Lexapro, and drinking Irish Cream on the rocks at 9:00a.m.
As this piece points out we are allowing people to redefine conservatism, this article focuses on Huck but the same can be said for 3 faux Republicans and what is worse far too many of you are allowing it.

As of today, December 18, 2007 I still have the utmost confidence that Fred Thompson will be the Republican Party’s nominee for President of the United States.
One reason why I believe that is because the major networks are completely ignoring him. Snoop WTF? I’ll explain.
Virtually every pundit on Fox goes out of their way to dismiss him and call him irrelevant. Republican pundits on interviews won’t even mention him.
I have even heard a couple of Democratic strategist say if he does not win South Carolina he will be out of the race.
Ask yourself this, if Fred Thompson’s campaign is in its final days, they why go out of your way to mention that?
Basically the media and the pundits are working awfully hard to discredit “an irrelevant” candidate.

Lets get real here; the Democrats do not want to run against Thompson, because he is not a closet liberal, because he has never advocated for big government, opening our boarders to illegal immigrants, reducing our military, backing away from the war against Islamic terrorist pimps, granting clemency to murderers and the list goes on.
He is not flashy, not a smooth talker, he looks like a worn out grandpa on most days, has this annoying clearing of the throat thingy he does, and dude needs to STILL get some good designer to have his suites tailored to fit him better.
But most of all I respect and admire an individual who is one of the Thompson’s campaigns most important individuals. I have said this before and I will say again, he has said to me that Thompson is a good man and a sincere man and could make a great president. He believes in him. From this individual, that is enough for me.

Every Republican pundit pulling for one of the three frauds dismisses him, because they want to avoid the conservative comparisons.
My anger comes from the people who claim to be Republican and some TV and blog pundits who proclaim themselves to be on the “conservative” bandwagon touting the faux conservative credentials of candidates like Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Giuliani? What the fuck are you people drinking in the morning?

We need to stop trying to redefine conservatism, maybe some of you need to go back and understand what that actually means.
If you people who have given your support to these frauds don’t wake up this party will be on the outside looking in the next 8 plus years, because you allowed fictitious poll numbers, Sunday morning Baptist preaching rhetoric, New York shyster slick talking points, and a lying ass LDS fraud to redefine conservatism.

Unlike a great number of bloggers and pundits who pimp for these campaigns, I’m not in Thompson’s pocket, I’m not paid to put a bunch of banner bullshit on my site, I don’t work for his campaign, not a family member, a friend from back in the day, has never been invited to interview or spend time with a candidate, I don’t have exclusive access to a campaign, never been invited to a campaign rally or party, not a pimp for the Republican Party.
Not paid to post my opinions on my blog or any other blog, do not receive one dime of money from blogging.
I do it because I love blogging, I have fun doing it, and I love to share my opinions. What you read and see is what I am.

If Fred does not get the nomination, the world will not end, I will be greatly disappointed, and I will be forced to support one of these frauds.
The only thing I can hope for is a Republican majority in one or both of the chambers.
Hopefully some Republican discipline will be administered.
Bottom line I’m just a brotha tryin’ to make sense of this campaign bullshit and seriously is not liking what he is seeing.

Sphere: Related Content

House guts border fence

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

fence2.JPG

From Michelle Malkin, oh this pisses me off!

The fence gets robbed, but the spending bill gives $10 million in “emergency” funding for attorneys of illegal immigrants?!!?!I’ve warned several times that the border fence expansion was gesture politics. (See here, here, here, and here.) We’ve watched Democrats and Republicans undermine the Secure Fence Act repeatedly since it was passed. Open-borders zealots joined with Big Business types to stall and protest construction. It ain’t a fence. It’s a FINO: Fence in Name Only. Here’s more confirmation of the fence farce via the Washington Times:

Congress last night passed a giant new spending bill that undermines current plans for a U.S.-Mexico border fence, allowing the Homeland Security Department to build a single-tier barrier rather than the two-tier version that has worked in California…The 2006 Secure Fence Act specifically called for “two layers of reinforced fencing” and listed five specific sections of border where it should be installed. The new spending bill removes the two-tier requirement and the list of locations.House Democrats said they were just adopting the Senate version, which was backed by a bipartisan group of border-state senators and passed the Senate several times this year.

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, the Texas Republican who has led the charge to change the 2006 law, said she wants to give Homeland Security more flexibility and wants local officials and landowners to be consulted.

“Senator Hutchison believes that Customs and Border Protection can better decide how to utilize limited resources to secure the border than a congressman from Maine,” said Matt Mackowiak, Mrs. Hutchison’s spokesman. He said double-tier fencing has worked in San Diego, but it might not be the right solution for the entire fence.

But Rep. Peter T. King, who sponsored the Secure Fence Act, said if the goal was to give DHS flexibility, the senators have failed.

“This is either a blatant oversight or a deliberate attempt to disregard the border security of our country,” the New York Republican said. “As it’s currently written, the omnibus language guts the Secure Fence Act almost entirely. Quite simply, it is unacceptable.”

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

More fake liberal outrage: The Rehabilitation of Duane “Dog” Chapman

Monday, December 17th, 2007

nigo.jpgDog Chapman comes back to bite ranting white liberal’s.
I was tipped off to this story (White Supremacist Sympathizer Sean Hannity Helps Duane “Dog” Chapman Rehabilitate His Racist Image) and had the same reaction I usually do when white liberal types seemingly come to the rescue of black folks.

The individual who hammered out this shining example of fake white liberal outrage, after posting this particular story, I bet felt vindicated in some way; proud and believing that by her shining a light on the disgraceful racist Dog Chapman and his racist support network (comprised of Sean Hannity and Roy Innis) we would no longer be fooled by the notion that this hateful racist can be rehabilitated and in particular that we would remain angry at the professional racist Hannity who provides safe sanctuary to racists everywhere. After all, she is sure that those of us on the right, and particularly networks like Fox, promote racist values.

Ah but let’s not forget that Ellen is likely part of the elitist social network of liberals who are the conveyers of truth, justice and the liberal way.

This hack sites tag line: “We watch FOX so you don’t have to.” Can you imagine anything as outrageous as a website devoted to telling you what to think about a given topic?

Anywho, Hannity and Innis in an attempt at rehabilitating Chapman’s image have obviously touched a nerve in the white liberal “protect a darkie” community.

First of all - do I personally think the Dog Chapman is a racist? I’m not sure, maybe, but frankly I don’t give a shit.

His tirade on the infamous answering machine audio is one that is symptomatic of how many white people feel privately. Chapman, in addition, has parental issues that far exceed most father and son relationships.
As strained as my relationship with my father has been over the years there is nothing that would drive me to release an audio of a private family moment for public consumption.

The “bring a Negro” home to mommy and daddy scenario is one that a growing number of families must struggle with. It was a struggle with Mrs. Snoop’s parents, her father in tears at the notion that his wonderful first born lawyer daughter would marry some rogue Negro. It drove the man to tears, and not tears of joy.
I’m sure I was not the first and won’t be the last Negro introduced to skeptical white parents.

As for Chapman’s tirade on his son’s relationship, I never found his N-word rants as objectionable as most people seem to.

Certainly if the majority of you white folks reading this particular piece were to have every private conversation scrutinized a great number of you would be guilty of what I would guess would be called racial insensitivity.

I spent a lot of time out on the front steps of many homes upon my arrival because I was not allowed in many homes in my new neighborhood in Oakland amongst the lily white commune who believed that they insulated themselves from those unacceptable Negros that populated the city.

These individuals were your typical white liberal types in the Bay Area that would proudly tell you that they gave their all in support of “black” causes. However, when it came to their families and personal lives they wanted to be as far away from these Negros as possible.
Kind of like the fake outrage liberals had for Katrina victims because they could pin the calamity squarely on George Bush, because it made good political theatre and would provide the necessary imagery needed to display Republicans racist contempt for black people.

For me personally, I was able throughout my life to dip in and out of the “white” world.
From parties given by friends and acquaintances, countless community and social settings and work environments from my interactions I always knew that not all white people were not out to get me, a good number frankly were too busy unraveling their own lives to worry about what your typical black person was doing.

Duane “Dog” Chapman lived and operated in a world where he routinely dealt with the most screwed up Negros in American society.
Chris Rock said in a memorable stand up routine that “there are black folks and there are Niggas” and like him I hate me some Niggas.
I’m certain that I would find most of the “Niggers” that Chapman dealt with as contemptible as he obviously did, hence his ambivalence towards “some” black people.

The individual who wrote the above article seems to take issue that anybody, particularly an individual like Roy Innis who was active in the civil rights movement, would so eagerly come to the Dog’s defense, not to mention that a “white supremacist sympathizer” like Sean Hannity would also come to his defense and try to make excuses for Dogs racist tirade.
Innis and Hannity teaming up to try and rehabilitate Dog’s image.
Can you rehabilitate a racist? Who knows, but can you rehabilitate a pompous white liberal? I would bet that would be far more difficult.

What most folks always forget when engaging in the discussion of race is that virtually all liberal white people see most minorities, and in particular black folks, as pets.

White liberals in power have a patronizing way when it comes to dealing with black people. They think they are setting an example for the uneducated and ignorant to see their caring way is the correct way, despite the fact that most of their present-day physical, intellectual, and political orbits remain mostly segregated.

Liberal racists, both white and black, focused on separatism and racial difference. Instead of subscribing to MLK’s belief in a color-blind society, they pushed for government policies that were color-coded. The further America progressed from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted that slavery was present throughout America’s social institutions and its personal interrelationships.

America was steeped in blood and guilt; it must pay for its crimes against Negros everywhere, so they are compelled to come to the rescue many times in the literary sense as did this Ellen character.
These are the individuals who populate the majority of America’s newsrooms and comprise websites like Newshound and Media Matters.

Her contempt for Hannity’s and Innis’s and their symbolic gesture of reaching out to this fallen soul was based upon feelings that this liberal chick could not stand. She obviously does not believe that every story has two sides to it.

However we all know that this particular piece is more about discrediting Hannity than anything else. We all know that Republicans are professional racists, and these on air racist media moguls need to be discredited because it fits into the desired plan of demeaning right leaning views simply for political gain.

How does fake outrage by some liberal chick benefit me? It doesn’t. It’s just one more example of someone who likely spends very little time around black folks and certainly someone who likely has little contact with Negros who simply are not obsessed with
the race based tirade of a Mullet pimping bounty hunter and in particular Negros who refuse to see themselves as victims.

I have never had this raced based anger at white folks that liberals feed off and think all smart blacks must feel. With the love and guidance of my parents I simply have never been ashamed of what I saw in the mirror. Most anger that black folks tend to have towards whites is more symptomatic of self hatred. So who better to blame than whitey. Liberal Democrats like to guide you towards a more specific beast, evil right wingers like Rush and Hannity.

For me I took to heart at an early age Dr. King’s notion that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Nevertheless, white liberal types have marginalized this notion as quaint and naive.

Far too many liberals hide behind the delusion that anyone who votes for Democrats and doesn’t have a pointy hood in the closet is “a good guy” in the movement toward greater social justice, as though the Democratic Party is some bastion of progressivism.

Ellen is your emblematic color-blind liberal whose menacing paternalism, dehumanizing tokenism, and cognitive indoctrination oozes out between superficially progressive words and deeds.

I bet that liberals like Ellen who read this will turn on the victimized act and bemoan the fact that a hostile Negro like I would attempt to burst their liberal racism free bubble. I’m certain she would be like most defensive liberals inexplicably bringing up their Negro friends, lovers, adopted children, relatives, ancestors; dismissing, belittling, misreading the substantive informed Negro analysis that someone like I would provide. In order for her to feel better, she has to pretend that I am some how not authentically black enough to have an informed opinion.

Now I must not be too harsh, not all white liberals are like this. There are some white liberals are actually interested in learning and understanding that not all of us black folks are still wearing shackles around our ankles, although some still symbolically wear shackles around the mind.

My message to Ellen simply would be this ” Frankly, we black folks don’t need you white liberals to come to our rescue.”

Although Chapman’s words, as disgraceful as they were, only reveals that he has a heart that obviously is filled with pain and anger - but most of all ignorance.

Only God can decipher his perceived racial hostility and only he can know if his rehabilitation is genuine, or if it is simply to get back the financial rewards that his popularity from his cartoonish persona provided him.
Mr. Chapman’s racial conundrum and reclamation project is hardly something that most Negros are concerned with, nor is Innis’s participation.

As I have said many times, the most dangerous racists in this society are not ranting mullet sporting Confederate flag waving neo-Nazi types.
The bigger dangers are more likely to come from race baiting, poverty pimping, social
engineering liberals who continue to view blacks and other minorities as political and ideological tools to obtain and remain in power. These types view blacks as lab rats on whom they can test their elitist sociological mad scientist experiments in their attempt to shape society in their liberal utopia image.

No flags or swastikas to identify them, but we can still spot them. Just look for more articles written by the Ellen’s of the world.

Sphere: Related Content

Clintons Have 3 Cayman Island Accounts

Monday, December 17th, 2007

clinton.jpgFound on the blog Sweetness & Light

By Timothy J. Burger and Ryan J. Donmoyer

Dec. 17 (Bloomberg)

— Former President Bill Clinton’s decision to reconsider a business relationship with California billionaire Ron Burkle reflects concern those financial dealings may embarrass his wife’s presidential candidacy.

Securities and Exchange Commission documents and financial- disclosure forms filed by Hillary Clinton show that Bill Clinton, 61, has a financial stake in three investment entities registered in the Cayman Islands by Burkle’s Yucaipa Cos. LLC.

In 2004, Hillary Clinton, a New York senator, said she wanted to close the “loopholes” for “people who create a mailbox, or a drop, or send one person to sit on the beach in some island paradise and claim that it is their offshore headquarters.”

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

Operation Rescue Hillary

Monday, December 17th, 2007

DAMM WTF!?
hillold.jpgFrom Michelle Malkin

Ah, the whiff of desperation in morning. Can you smell it? It’s Hillary Clinton’s new perfume. She’s on a whirlwind media tour this morning to rescue her crumbling campaign. “You can look inside her mouth, if you want.” Eww.However flabbergastingly stupid her missteps have been, though, it would be a mistake to count her out. (Case in point: See The Real Oprah Effect.) She may be as transparent as glass to most of us, but she does have legions of blind followers, supporters, and fence-sitters who will be swayed by maudlin efforts like the new likeability project and “The Hillary I Know” website:

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, trying to warm up an image some voters perceive as cold, starts a drive Monday to showcase her personal side with testimonials from friends, associates and constituents she has helped.
The online and in-person campaign, complete with a website called TheHillaryIKnow.com, comes a day after Clinton won a key endorsement from The Des Moines Register and her chief rival in the Democratic nomination race, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, was endorsed by The Boston Globe…

Read the rest here

Sphere: Related Content

Romney: The biggest political liar I have ever witnessed.

Sunday, December 16th, 2007

UPDATE: “I wanted to say that I thought Romney was excellent on “Meet the Press” - Folks I’m speechless, fucking amazing!

Romney on Meet the Press: Gun rights/immigration positions under fire

Then of course there are the clueless blind supporters

Evangelicals for Mitt


romneyvarmint-md.jpgFolks I have been a political junkie for a long time. At 44 years of age, I have followed politics fairly closely since I was in Junior High. Not obsessively or anything, but I grew up around a number of individuals who were well known in political circles in the Bay Area back in the day and I have mentioned these individuals before.My political “give a shit meter” went up significantly during the Reagan presidency and I got to the point of actually studying candidates and scrutinizing them more and more particularly individual on the other side of the political aisle.My political views have not changed much, but I have seen a change in the quality of politicians.

Having said that, I often wonder - could the politicians of yesteryear survive the white hot spotlight of today’s campaigns with You Tube, podcasts, blogs, and all the legions of political pundits who pimp their fictitious knowledge to any interested media outlet eager to fill program time?

I know I’m naïve in saying it, but I would have thought that today’s politicians would have a basic understanding of the media magnifying glass that hovers above them on a daily basis.

Mitt Romney is either totally clueless about this fact or he just does not give a fuck.
He is counting on the fact that the average American citizen is a complete idiot and is not paying attention to the political grind; because he hopes that they are much too busy raising their children, working hard on getting that degree, hard at that nine to five just trying to make ends meet.

Maybe voters aren’t paying attention. Not paying attention because of that long subway ride home, or that tiring bumper to bumper traffic on the 405 or the 95.

Not paying attention because they are focused on that new relationship, or maybe preparing that award wining menu for the upcoming Christmas Party.

Not paying attention because mom or dad may be sick, there has been an untimely death in the family, grief from depression, not being able to get your kids all they want this Christmas.

Not paying attention because they are too busy scheming, trying to figure out the story to tell the wife, while the mistress makes the hotel reservation or busy finding that perfect dress to wear on the town because her friend has found the perfect one for you.

Mitt Romney is counting on the fact that there is just so much to occupy our time and so precious few hours in the day.

Oddly enough there are people like me paying way too much attention to liars like Romney and in addition we are willing to devote some of those precious moments that could be devoted to giving my wife a kiss and a big hug to thank her for being the perfect wife. Or playing with the grandchildren or playing my favorite video game. All of the attention being paid to politicians over the years and I have NEVER ever witnessed a politician that was a big a liar as Mitt Romney.

With apologies to Hillary and Bill Clinton, Mitt Romney is by far the best trained monkey politician I have ever seen.

None of my disdain for Romney should matter. His appearance on Meet the Press this morning should kill his run for the presidency. If it does not, people are simply not paying attention.

I have never heard a politician change a position on a topic in the middle of a sentence as many times as Mitt. What makes this morning’s performance more incredible is that I’m sure he was prepared for what Russert was going to ask him and he still failed miserably.
I had a clip of a recent appearance by Michael Dukakis where he called Mitt Romney a huge fraud. I don’t think that goes far enough. This is a man without any political soul whatsoever. His is incapable of telling the truth on where he stands on an issue, because he doesn’t know where he stands; it depends on who he is trying to convince.
Is it a bunch of Iowa farmers, Christians in South Carolina, the NRA, a group of left leaning types in New Hampshire or an anti-abortion group in Pennsylvania? His position shifts to fit his audience.

He is the most deceitful sack of shit in American politics today.

Now those of you who have been peeping this blog for awhile, should already know that I have never ever given Romney any chance in receiving the Republican nomination, mainly because he was Mormon and I have been ranting about that for awhile.
But I will finally admit that his Mormon, Oops…. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints background will have NOTHING to do with him not receiving the nomination.

He will not receive the nomination because he is a fucken chronic liar. He is more then a chronic flip-flopper. He is a trained monkey, crediting his parents for all his thoughts and motivations, and he truly has no core beliefs of his own.

Oh I did not forget folks the line in the interview where he said that he “literally wept” in 1978 when he heard that the Mormon church had finally decided that blacks could be equal members of that faith.

This has to go down as one of the biggest lies ever told in presidential campaign history.

Almost a bigger load of crap than William Jefferson’s “depends on what the meaning of (is) is”

Although I may disagree with a person’s choice for president during this campaign cycle I can understand the support of virtually all of the candidates on both sides of the political divide. I clearly don’t understand how anybody who is paying attention can support Romney’s candidacy.
This man completely devoid of any core principals should not appeal to any relatively rational voter.

Anybody who after watching “Meet the Press” this morning who would still say that they can support this man for president of the United States is frankly either not wrapped too tight or is an individual who believes that saying whatever needs to be said to get you to your desired goals is a noble endeavor.

People who support Mitt Romney; but don’t want to work for such an individual, be married to or in a relationship with such an individual or raising such an individual, are hypocrites. Chronic lying is wrong and would not be tolerated in any relationship particularly and especially the relationship between this nations president and the American people.

Watch program


romney2.JPG
Romney: I don’t flip-flop, I learn from experience:

Here’s a key quote from Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s appearance this morning on NBC-TV’s Meet the Press, during which most of host Tim Russert’s questions focused on whether Romney has flip-flopped on issues such as abortion, gun control, taxes and health care. Romney said the only issue he’s changed much on is abortion — from effectively “pro-choice” to his current “pro-life” stance. Then, he had this to say:

“Tim, if you’re looking for someone who’s never changed any positions on any policies, then I’m not your guy. I do learn from experience. If you want someone who doesn’t learn from experience — who stubbornly takes a position on a particular act and says ‘well, I’m never changing my view based on what I’ve learned’ — that doesn’t make sense to me.”

Some other things Romney said:

In his recent speech about religion, his Mormon faith and the role of faith in public life, Romney said “freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom.” Pressed by Russert, Romney said that does not mean atheists cannot also be moral persons.

“On an individual basis you have many individuals of great morality that don’t have a particular faith,” he said. He also said he would not require that Supreme Court nominees be men or women of faith.

• He wept with joy the day in 1978 when he heard that the Mormon church had finally decided that blacks could be equal members of that faith. “You can see what I believed and what my family believed,” he said. “My dad (former Michigan Governor George Romney) marched Martin Luther King. … Those are my fundamental core beliefs.” He was driving when he heard the news and “I pulled over and literally wept.”

As president he would not seek to outlaw the use of so-called “surplus embryos” for stem-cell research.

He continues to believe that rival Republican contender Mike Huckabee “owes the president an apology” for saying the Bush administration has been arrogant and has a bunker mentality when it comes to foreign policy. That’s different, Romney insisted, from his criticism of the administration’s handling of the post-combat operations phase of the war in Iraq.

“It is a mess,” he said of the situation in Iraq. “If you’re suggesting that it’s equivalent to say we’ve made a lot of errors … and that the president is arrogant and has a bunker mentality … that’s where (Huckabee) went over the line.”

Russert, by the way, said his guest next week will be Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul. Meet the Press is archiving its interviews with the presidential contenders here.


What I was thinking… 

From Wonkette  

My Bullshit Meter — the standards for which Mitt Romney had already raised dramatically — is blinking furiously:

I can remember when, when I heard about the change being made. I was driving home from, I think, it was law school, but I was driving home, going through the Fresh Pond rotary in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I heard it on the radio, and I pulled over and, and literally wept.

Awww, It gave him an opportunity to get fathers for all those immoral Negroes and their gunshootingness.

In case you forgot:
Ann Romney Doesn’t Recall Contribution to Abortion Group

Romney: Gay couples raising kids is the American way

Romney, self-described lifelong hunter, has hunted on two occasions

Sphere: Related Content

I’m sorry but I love Kansas Politics

Friday, December 14th, 2007

I’m sorry but I could not resist the temptation of posting the exploits of yet another man who has simultaneous destroyed his political career and likely his family because his dick obviously ran his life.
Kansas Attorney General Paul Morrison resigns.

The KC Buzz Blog has Morrison’s full statement. I did not read it, but c’mon you know what dude said, wanna bet how many times he uses God? LOL! 

Let me say, being a man in all, that I certainly have come close to sacrificing what was good for me for what could be described as a little more than some cheap male ego massaging.

However, I have never been able to figure out why some seemingly well rounded dudes, dudes who have so much going for them either personally or professionally will destroy their lives all because of a marginal piece of ass. Not even a great piece of ass.

Let’s see; AG’s office, good gig, lots of respect, Democrat hero, good reputation, bright political future… er uh hmmmm…. marginal piece of ass…. good gig…. marginal piece of ass. wow.

It’s not like dudes are sacrificing business or political careers over chicks who look like Halle Berry or Jessica Biel, hell even a walking white trash tard like Brittany Spears.

carter.jpgThe first thing I wanted to know when this story broke in the Topeka Capital Journal last week, was I want to see a picture, man she better be slammin’ LOL!

This is her in the photo. Yawn…

Mrs. Snoop said the lady in question was described as a curvaceous blonde, flirty, who liked to wear tight clothes and liked the big Texas hairdos. Yup those women in those tight clothes they will fuck a brotha up every time.

So now Kansas Democrats are in mourning, they are devastated because Morrison jumped over to the Democrat side and won over the abortion Jihadist Phil Kline as did our Lieutenant Governor.
Basically here in Kansas we have three parties Democrats, Moderate Republicans, and the Extreme Right. This is why although I could unify the party, could restore order, would make a great candidate for damm near anything I stay clear of the Republicans here, they are just fucked up, hopelessly unorganized and unfocused and most would remind you of Sam Brownback, likely one of the top five politicians in America that I am totally embarrassed that they are in the Republican Party. Kansas has an entire state of these crazy zealot rednecks.

I remember going to the first Yearly Kos convention when the party switching was going down and the libs there were so curious about Kansas Politics and gleeful at the apparent demise of the Republican Party in Kansas.

Kline is vilified here in Kansas you can check out more about that in this post by El Borak. Here is more stuff

But back to the sex thingy, this is a question for the dudes, is there actually pussy out there that is so great that you would sacrifice everything for a few minutes (well in Morrison’s case multiple few minute sessions) for a piece of ass?

I have see a lot of very pretty women in my lifetime, some with bangin bodies, tight asses, impressive sweater cows (or as one friend calls them “fun bags”) and the business suit clad chicks that stroll through airports (I love women in business
suits.)
But I swear, I have yet to see a woman that I thought was so incredible that I was willing to sacrifice everything to engage in some headboard destruction.

Now the libs are mortified. Check out this entry from a lib blogger: Link

I’m sick at heart, but I don’t see anything else Morrison could do.As one of the most visible Democrats in the state, Morrison was helping to lead the charge against the religious right. He was also helping to push the state out of more than a century of Republican domination and into the blue column.

Having Morrison associated with the Democratic Party would have given Republicans and social conservatives an issue to rally behind. It would have sucked the air out of the Democratic resurgence.

Right now, I just want to cry. I voted for Morrison. I defended him on this blog. I saw him as a leader who could turn Kansas away from the blindly incompetent, abortion-obsessed regime of Phill Kline. I saw him as someone who could make the office of attorney general work for all Kansans — not just those who shared one narrow religious viewpoint.

Ok now don’t you think I’m trying to be highbrow about this, I have had countless “god damm” moments after seeing a smoking female. But I have this weird tick;  as turned on as I may be at that moment I’m thinking I bet that bitch is crazy. Especially here in Larryville when I see a nice looking female and some dude is draped all over her and won’t let go. I’m thinking “needy” and I bet she makes dude fix her breakfast in bed.

Anywho, another man bites the dust at the hand of another skank. (She was married and cheating on her husband) so skank is appropriate.

So if you dudes out there are going out this weekend, be careful, if you are in a relationship, don’t let a pair of impressive sweater cows cause you to lose focus and potentially cost you a good solid relationship, a bunch of dead presidents and good ole hard earned respect. Something that is so elusive for so many men these days.

Sphere: Related Content