More fake liberal outrage: The Rehabilitation of Duane “Dog” Chapman

nigo.jpgDog Chapman comes back to bite ranting white liberal’s.
I was tipped off to this story (White Supremacist Sympathizer Sean Hannity Helps Duane “Dog” Chapman Rehabilitate His Racist Image) and had the same reaction I usually do when white liberal types seemingly come to the rescue of black folks.

The individual who hammered out this shining example of fake white liberal outrage, after posting this particular story, I bet felt vindicated in some way; proud and believing that by her shining a light on the disgraceful racist Dog Chapman and his racist support network (comprised of Sean Hannity and Roy Innis) we would no longer be fooled by the notion that this hateful racist can be rehabilitated and in particular that we would remain angry at the professional racist Hannity who provides safe sanctuary to racists everywhere. After all, she is sure that those of us on the right, and particularly networks like Fox, promote racist values.

Ah but let’s not forget that Ellen is likely part of the elitist social network of liberals who are the conveyers of truth, justice and the liberal way.

This hack sites tag line: “We watch FOX so you don’t have to.” Can you imagine anything as outrageous as a website devoted to telling you what to think about a given topic?

Anywho, Hannity and Innis in an attempt at rehabilitating Chapman’s image have obviously touched a nerve in the white liberal “protect a darkie” community.

First of all - do I personally think the Dog Chapman is a racist? I’m not sure, maybe, but frankly I don’t give a shit.

His tirade on the infamous answering machine audio is one that is symptomatic of how many white people feel privately. Chapman, in addition, has parental issues that far exceed most father and son relationships.
As strained as my relationship with my father has been over the years there is nothing that would drive me to release an audio of a private family moment for public consumption.

The “bring a Negro” home to mommy and daddy scenario is one that a growing number of families must struggle with. It was a struggle with Mrs. Snoop’s parents, her father in tears at the notion that his wonderful first born lawyer daughter would marry some rogue Negro. It drove the man to tears, and not tears of joy.
I’m sure I was not the first and won’t be the last Negro introduced to skeptical white parents.

As for Chapman’s tirade on his son’s relationship, I never found his N-word rants as objectionable as most people seem to.

Certainly if the majority of you white folks reading this particular piece were to have every private conversation scrutinized a great number of you would be guilty of what I would guess would be called racial insensitivity.

I spent a lot of time out on the front steps of many homes upon my arrival because I was not allowed in many homes in my new neighborhood in Oakland amongst the lily white commune who believed that they insulated themselves from those unacceptable Negros that populated the city.

These individuals were your typical white liberal types in the Bay Area that would proudly tell you that they gave their all in support of “black” causes. However, when it came to their families and personal lives they wanted to be as far away from these Negros as possible.
Kind of like the fake outrage liberals had for Katrina victims because they could pin the calamity squarely on George Bush, because it made good political theatre and would provide the necessary imagery needed to display Republicans racist contempt for black people.

For me personally, I was able throughout my life to dip in and out of the “white” world.
From parties given by friends and acquaintances, countless community and social settings and work environments from my interactions I always knew that not all white people were not out to get me, a good number frankly were too busy unraveling their own lives to worry about what your typical black person was doing.

Duane “Dog” Chapman lived and operated in a world where he routinely dealt with the most screwed up Negros in American society.
Chris Rock said in a memorable stand up routine that “there are black folks and there are Niggas” and like him I hate me some Niggas.
I’m certain that I would find most of the “Niggers” that Chapman dealt with as contemptible as he obviously did, hence his ambivalence towards “some” black people.

The individual who wrote the above article seems to take issue that anybody, particularly an individual like Roy Innis who was active in the civil rights movement, would so eagerly come to the Dog’s defense, not to mention that a “white supremacist sympathizer” like Sean Hannity would also come to his defense and try to make excuses for Dogs racist tirade.
Innis and Hannity teaming up to try and rehabilitate Dog’s image.
Can you rehabilitate a racist? Who knows, but can you rehabilitate a pompous white liberal? I would bet that would be far more difficult.

What most folks always forget when engaging in the discussion of race is that virtually all liberal white people see most minorities, and in particular black folks, as pets.

White liberals in power have a patronizing way when it comes to dealing with black people. They think they are setting an example for the uneducated and ignorant to see their caring way is the correct way, despite the fact that most of their present-day physical, intellectual, and political orbits remain mostly segregated.

Liberal racists, both white and black, focused on separatism and racial difference. Instead of subscribing to MLK’s belief in a color-blind society, they pushed for government policies that were color-coded. The further America progressed from the dark days of slavery, the more they insisted that slavery was present throughout America’s social institutions and its personal interrelationships.

America was steeped in blood and guilt; it must pay for its crimes against Negros everywhere, so they are compelled to come to the rescue many times in the literary sense as did this Ellen character.
These are the individuals who populate the majority of America’s newsrooms and comprise websites like Newshound and Media Matters.

Her contempt for Hannity’s and Innis’s and their symbolic gesture of reaching out to this fallen soul was based upon feelings that this liberal chick could not stand. She obviously does not believe that every story has two sides to it.

However we all know that this particular piece is more about discrediting Hannity than anything else. We all know that Republicans are professional racists, and these on air racist media moguls need to be discredited because it fits into the desired plan of demeaning right leaning views simply for political gain.

How does fake outrage by some liberal chick benefit me? It doesn’t. It’s just one more example of someone who likely spends very little time around black folks and certainly someone who likely has little contact with Negros who simply are not obsessed with
the race based tirade of a Mullet pimping bounty hunter and in particular Negros who refuse to see themselves as victims.

I have never had this raced based anger at white folks that liberals feed off and think all smart blacks must feel. With the love and guidance of my parents I simply have never been ashamed of what I saw in the mirror. Most anger that black folks tend to have towards whites is more symptomatic of self hatred. So who better to blame than whitey. Liberal Democrats like to guide you towards a more specific beast, evil right wingers like Rush and Hannity.

For me I took to heart at an early age Dr. King’s notion that people should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Nevertheless, white liberal types have marginalized this notion as quaint and naive.

Far too many liberals hide behind the delusion that anyone who votes for Democrats and doesn’t have a pointy hood in the closet is “a good guy” in the movement toward greater social justice, as though the Democratic Party is some bastion of progressivism.

Ellen is your emblematic color-blind liberal whose menacing paternalism, dehumanizing tokenism, and cognitive indoctrination oozes out between superficially progressive words and deeds.

I bet that liberals like Ellen who read this will turn on the victimized act and bemoan the fact that a hostile Negro like I would attempt to burst their liberal racism free bubble. I’m certain she would be like most defensive liberals inexplicably bringing up their Negro friends, lovers, adopted children, relatives, ancestors; dismissing, belittling, misreading the substantive informed Negro analysis that someone like I would provide. In order for her to feel better, she has to pretend that I am some how not authentically black enough to have an informed opinion.

Now I must not be too harsh, not all white liberals are like this. There are some white liberals are actually interested in learning and understanding that not all of us black folks are still wearing shackles around our ankles, although some still symbolically wear shackles around the mind.

My message to Ellen simply would be this ” Frankly, we black folks don’t need you white liberals to come to our rescue.”

Although Chapman’s words, as disgraceful as they were, only reveals that he has a heart that obviously is filled with pain and anger - but most of all ignorance.

Only God can decipher his perceived racial hostility and only he can know if his rehabilitation is genuine, or if it is simply to get back the financial rewards that his popularity from his cartoonish persona provided him.
Mr. Chapman’s racial conundrum and reclamation project is hardly something that most Negros are concerned with, nor is Innis’s participation.

As I have said many times, the most dangerous racists in this society are not ranting mullet sporting Confederate flag waving neo-Nazi types.
The bigger dangers are more likely to come from race baiting, poverty pimping, social
engineering liberals who continue to view blacks and other minorities as political and ideological tools to obtain and remain in power. These types view blacks as lab rats on whom they can test their elitist sociological mad scientist experiments in their attempt to shape society in their liberal utopia image.

No flags or swastikas to identify them, but we can still spot them. Just look for more articles written by the Ellen’s of the world.

Sphere: Related Content

5 Responses to “More fake liberal outrage: The Rehabilitation of Duane “Dog” Chapman”

  1. mondoreb Says:

    snoop,

    words fail me.

    This is powerful, really good and true.

    wow.

    wow.

    ….

    wow to the max.

  2. mitzibel Says:

    One more reason why I’m so damned glad we married the right people so that I get to claim the priviledge of calling you “family”.

    I hearts me some Snoop, yes I does.

  3. Jeremayakovka Says:

    Way to go, Snoop.

  4. Rebellious Pastors Wife Says:

    Your comment on how Dog Chapman has to deal with the scum of the earth in the job that he does, and how that influences his perspective on blacks is very insightful. My dad was a cop. My best friend was a black guy whose father owned a respectable business and they could afford a nicer house than we could. But my dad couldn’t handle me hanging out with him in our front yard. I still cringe at the stuff that he says, and he won’t believe me when I say that a lot of the entitlement attitudes are socio-economic class, not racial — because I am a social worker that has to deal with the attitudes that he decries all the time, and all my clients are white. But he’s never gone out of the way to socialize with blacks, and so the only ones he knows are the ones he’s arrested. I still am appalled at some of the crap that comes out of his mouth, but I at least partially understand where it comes from.

    I love your site. I found it last week and doubt that I will be missing any of this anytime soon! Thanks for your insight!!

  5. dotdot Says:

    When I heard about this tape, I tried not to listen to it. The selling of a family argument to the press is shows a lower scumbag element than anything that was said by either party. Why was it even recorded? Scumbag son obviously had plans and knew he could bait daddy.

    But, whatever, I listened to it at some point. The thing that gets me, and that you touched on, was that this sad excuse for a father has deeper problems than hating niggers. Maybe I heard the tape wrong. What I heard was not a father resisting his son’s girlfriend because she is black, he is raising hell because her presence in the family could cost him his career. If you take a man and villify him in public, why is hating niggers worse than having your son pick his women based on your career.

    Besides, his main complaint was that they use the word “nigger” in the house, and the girl might get offended. Jesus Christ. What a pussy.

    I agree that the whole racial angle here is just a diversion from the deeper problems going on in this shallow soul. I can only say that if I was black, I would be proud that this shallow motherfucker hated niggers.

    Most of these Neo-Nazi types are equally as stupid. Harmless? Probably so, but damn, I get sick of hearing how they somehow in any way, shape or form, represent me or my “heritage”.

Leave a Reply