Mitt version 2.0: Protecting Traditional Marriage
Hmmm was checking out some random blogs and found this about Mitt on Pandagon
Surfing over at Mitt Romney’s campaign web site, I came across the former Massachusetts governor’s proud statement of his goal of protecting marriage (he doesn’t believe in civil unions now, either.
“I will work with the people in this room, as I have for the past four years, to champion a federal marriage amendment to protect marriage as the union of a man and a woman. … Make no mistake: a federal amendment is the only way we can protect marriage from liberal, unelected judges.” - Gov. Mitt Romney
(Gov. Mitt Romney, Address To The Family Research Council’s Values Voter Summit, 10/19/07)
In A 2006 Letter To All 100 U.S. Senators, Gov. Romney Stressed Traditional Marriage As “The Ideal Setting For Nurturing And Developing Children.” GOV. ROMNEY: “Our society, like all known civilizations in recorded history, has favored the union of a man and a woman with the special designation and benefits of marriage. In this respect, it has elevated the relationship of a legally bound man and woman over other relationships. This recognizes that the ideal setting for nurturing and developing children is a home where there is a mother and a father.”
(Gov. Mitt Romney, Letter To United States Senators, 6/2/06)
Strange, though, I didn’t see this up at the site —
I still say way too many people would simply not vote for a Mormon anyway and they damm sure won’t vote for a politically challenged flip floppin’ Mormon.
Sphere: Related Content
![[Valid RSS]](http://politicalpartypoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
November 5th, 2007 at 10:08 pm
To quote my favorite philosopher:
“These are my principles; if you don’t like them, I have others.” -Groucho Marx