<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moonbat watch</title>
	<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2007/10/03/moonbat-watch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chris De La Cruz</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2007/10/03/moonbat-watch/#comment-32044</link>
		<author>Chris De La Cruz</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2007/10/03/moonbat-watch/#comment-32044</guid>
					<description>I find it difficult to believe that anyone could think that global warming is not a reality. I can admit that good 'ol mother earth has the occassional hot flashes--it's not like the "el nino" phenomenon is caused by global warming, however, no one can claim that the emissions from our cars, factories, etc. don't have a detrimental effect on the environment. Perhaps the concern is not as urgent as our good friend Albert Gore seems to think--but the timeline is irrelevant. The facts are significant. I think that there are corporate influences on both sides. Corn farmers want ethanol (when ethanol from sugar is cleaner) OPEC wants to avoid that. No one wants to produce a COMPLETELY environmentally safe vehicle.  I've read a lot of the blogs concerning the global warming business, and I contend that simply because environmental products from "green" corporations are a farce, one cannot assume that the premise that they are working from is also a farce. We're all smarter than that. Such arguments are entirely straw man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it difficult to believe that anyone could think that global warming is not a reality. I can admit that good &#8216;ol mother earth has the occassional hot flashes&#8211;it&#8217;s not like the &#8220;el nino&#8221; phenomenon is caused by global warming, however, no one can claim that the emissions from our cars, factories, etc. don&#8217;t have a detrimental effect on the environment. Perhaps the concern is not as urgent as our good friend Albert Gore seems to think&#8211;but the timeline is irrelevant. The facts are significant. I think that there are corporate influences on both sides. Corn farmers want ethanol (when ethanol from sugar is cleaner) OPEC wants to avoid that. No one wants to produce a COMPLETELY environmentally safe vehicle.  I&#8217;ve read a lot of the blogs concerning the global warming business, and I contend that simply because environmental products from &#8220;green&#8221; corporations are a farce, one cannot assume that the premise that they are working from is also a farce. We&#8217;re all smarter than that. Such arguments are entirely straw man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
