Clinton: $5,000 for Every U.S. Baby - What the hell is this crap?
Saturday, September 29th, 2007
Ok folks I usually don’t post on the weekends, I try to take a break and chill and avoid politics and other crap on the weekends.
I’m here on a lazy Saturday evening, fresh off of helping my daughter move and seeing the grandbaby, browsing the net, checking college football scored before I call it a night to prepare for football day and my Niners big game against Seattle.
I accidently click onto the Drudge Report bookmark and I see the headline:
Clinton: $5,000 for Every U.S. Baby , I click on the link and read;
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 “baby bond” from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.
Clinton, her party’s front-runner in the 2008 race, made the suggestion during a forum hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus.”I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that down payment on their first home,” she said. You can read the rest here if you want.
Folks let me tell you something, she is pulling out this card mighty early in the campaign, Democrats are usually more selective about when to pull out the government freebies card to ignorant ass greedy fucks.
However this is a clear sign of just how far we have fallen in the political arena. The leading candidate for the Democrats is already pulling out the socialist distribution of wealth play and I bet the tards in the audience said “yeah honey, show me the money.”
(Just picture the black woman head shifting side to side as you say that, wagging the finger then clapping loudly)
This is a remarkably sad time when votes are determined by who has the bigger tin cup.
This country is becoming overrun by a bunch of freeloading trolls salivating at the chance to have their pockets stuffed by other people’s money.
If you think the welfare mom syndrome is bad now, just imaging the dollar signs filling the eyes of skanks if you see Hillary celebrating a presidential victory.
Never mind the minor detail of their kids having to actually finish high school (don’t worry Negros ain’t finishing junior high school much less high school) and actually go to college, all the greedy ass skanks will see is another get gubment dollars scheme courtesy of the Democrats while flat on their backs.
I don’t know who is the bigger whore, the liberal skanks salivating at the potential gubment dollars for their chilren or Mrs. Bill for proposing it.
I was already nervous when I saw the woman. There was nothing intimidating about her, just a woman in her mid-30s in a pair of sweatpants and an oversized T-shirt, on an evening hike in early August. Still, when she passed me, I looked away from her. It was my first time distributing KKK fliers, and I didn’t want to be noticed.I’d purposely dressed as anonymously as possible: white shirt and jeans, with an 11-day beard, glasses and a ball cap for a university I never attended. My partner for the evening, Adrian Trentadue, was a bit more noticeable, thanks to his T-shirt with a cartoon gladiator declaring war against the hordes of uncircumcised Edomites (a biblical people who went to war with the Jews). I was clutching a thin stack of fliers. Trentadue had the staple gun in his pocket. At each telephone pole we came to, I would hand Trentadue a flier, and he would post it with a staple in each corner.
The front of the flier gave only half the intended message. Under the heading “Grizzly Bloody Murder” was a description of a young, white Tennessee couple allegedly raped and murdered by a gang of five black men. Walking past it, you might assume that it offered a reward for evidence in the case. The point was on the back side of the page, which was the side against the post. It directed you to a white-power online news broadcast and the national mailing address of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, or the Knights Party.
Trentadue looked back at the woman who had passed. “I don’t think she’s reading it,” he said. “You get a lot of people that just walk right by and don’t read it.”
Trentadue, 28 years old, father of two, is a fully accredited Knight. Though only two years older than me, he kept calling me a young guy. He had the type of slim, fit physique you often see on farm kids or anyone who has spent his life working outdoors. His scalp was recently shaved, and beneath the dark stubble I could see an S.S. tattoo on one side and what looked like a motorcycle on the other. His only other visible tattoos were the words Italian on one forearm and German on the other — representing his heritage, he explained, from his grandfathers.
After papering utility poles on a few blocks, we went to the other side of the street and headed back toward the car, which we had left in a Walgreens parking lot. We had started distributing literature almost three hours before, and the sun had set. The utility poles were the final bit of the routine. Trentadue always began by putting the fliers in boxes of the Pitch.
Edwards: ‘Pretty Soon We’re Not Going to Have a Young African-American Male Population in America.’
Asked about what he could do about “inner-city kids partaking in violence” at the MTV/MySpace Forum yesterday, Democratic candidate John Edwards offered an apocalyptic prediction for young black males:
“We cannot build enough prisons to solve this problem. And the idea that we can keep incarcerating and keep incarcerating — pretty soon we’re not going to have a young African-American male population in America. They’re all going to be in prison or dead. One of the two.”
Hyperbole much? Despite popular misperception and those who find it a convenient talking point to illustrate inescapable racism, there are more young African-American men in college than in prison. In 2005, according to the Census Bureau, there were 864,000 black men in college. According to Justice Department statistics, there were 802,000 in federal and state prisons and jails; between the ages of 18 and 24, however, black men in college outnumber those incarcerated by 4 to 1.
UPDATE: Some readers are finding the numbers above confusing. The first set of numbers (comparing 864,000 to 802,000) refers to all black men of all ages. The 4 to 1 ratio is among black men between the ages of 18 to 24. In other words, a large percentage of that 802,000 are black men above the age of 24.
Have you heard about the latest “controversy” involving Rush Limbaugh that has been made up from scratch by Media Matters and relentlessly promoted by the left side of the blogosphere? Well, no worries, I’ll tell you all about it.Here’s what Media Matters is claiming Rush Limbaugh said, Limbaugh: Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are “phony soldiers.”
Now, you might actually conclude from reading that headline that Rush Limbaugh said that, Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are “phony soldiers.”
Actually, he didn’t.
Once again, here’s the headline, from Media Matters,
Limbaugh: Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are “phony soldiers.”
Continue reading here what Rush Limbaugh actually said, during a conversation with a caller. Also go to his site Rushlimbaugh.com if you REALLY give a shit.
Ah hell I was not sure I wanted to post this, but since dude on Right Wing did a piece on this “phony” outrage, I figured my Poop readers should get the 411.
You know while on one hand I really getting tired of Media Matters and their blatant distortion of the facts on shit they have on their site, I kinda understand why they do what they do and why they are so successful at smear.
I heard on Rush’s show some of the comments made by some liberal Democrats denouncing what Rush said, I always have to remind myself that Democrats and liberals are never interested in truth, it’s simply about winning and Media Matters knows that the majority of their kook constituents only priority is getting their people in office at all costs.
Now don’t get me wrong, the purpose of this blog is to post stuff that interests me and my political views and yes, I want “my side to win.”
But I have never knowingly posted 411 here that I knew was bullshit just so I can make a fucking cheep political point.
Democrats must use deception to stay in power, but the scary thing is it works like a charm.
I’m dumbfounded at how many websites posted bullshit about O’Reilly and how they took his comments out of context when after reading further, few if any actually read or heard the comments themselves.
I’m perplexed at the vast differences in simple logic between the right blogsphere and the left.
Blogger on the right, in most cases go out of their way to get to the bottom of a story or issue and actively seek to get as much firm details on an issue as possible and the rarely comment and post shit unless they have their fucken facts straight.
Media Matters has these crackpot liberals by the mental ballz. It’s apparent that liberals can’t process information unless it has been pissed on by Media Matters.
Here are a few examples:
(link) Media Matters for America is calling attention to a Rush Limbaugh rant from his show on Wednesday in which he dismisses U.S. troops, including those now serving in Iraq, who disagree with President Bush’s stay-until-victory strategy as “phony soldiers.” And my colleague Jeff Fecke at Blog of the Moderate Left wonders whether those, including Sen. Norm Coleman, who were outraged by the MoveOn.org ad that was insufficiently respectful toward Gen. David Petraeus, will bring equal energy to denouncing Limbaugh for being insufficiently respectful toward some of the troops.
*********
(link) Following the MoveOn non-controversy, some of our local dingbats went on a largely unnoticed mini-crusade to get WA-08 Congressional candidate Darcy Burner to condemn the anti-war organization’s ad. Now that Rush Limbaugh has said something that was considerably more offensive to our men and women in uniform, we’re certain that Mark Gardner and the rest of the fair and balanced wingnutosphere will demand WA-08 Congressman Dave Reichert condemn Limbaugh’s remarks.
Earlier today Republican hero and recovering drug addict Rush Limbaugh slandered thousands of American soldiers who are risking their lives overseas as “phony soldiers.” Why? Solely because they question the rationale for the Iraq War.
*****
(link) How about leading conservative host Rush Limbaugh, a man who has regularly interviewed the president, vice-president, and numerous other conservative Republican luminaries?
During the September 26 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh called service members who advocate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq “phony soldiers.”
From the DCCC:
Chairman Chris Van Hollen Condemns Rush Limbaugh’s Outrageous Comment that Soldiers Who Support Withdrawing From Iraq Are “Phony Soldiers”
“Rush Limbaugh’s personal attack on our men and women in uniform is reprehensible. It minimizes the sacrifice our troops in Iraq and their families are making and has no place in the public discourse. Rush Limbaugh owes our military and their families an apology for his hurtful comments that minimize their service to our country.”
******
(link) John Amato: “I’m calling on the Senate to pass an amendment or uphold their latest one and condemn Rush Limbaugh’s cowardly acts on our troops! Soldiers from the 82nd Airborne in Iraq wrote a NY Times op-ed—criticizing the war in Iraq, and had the bravery to suggest that it was time to develop an exit strategy. Two of them just died. Are they phonies, Rush? Where’s the “sense of the Senate” on this outrage?
Let me be clear, I don’t give a shit that you oppose the U.S. being in Iraq, or oppose our Middle East policy, or how we use our troops or what our military priorities should be.
When I read lefty blog I’m interested in the discourse many provide and of course I don’t agree with much of it, but I think it’s important for me to be knowledgeable on issues and to remain grounded in my viewpoints I have an obligation (to myself) to be informed, understand and comprehend opposing viewpoints without filters. Whether it’s Media Matters or the MSM, John Stewart, Keith Olberman on the left, Newsbusters, Rush, O’Reilly on the right.
Especially since I dedicate so much time keeping up this paltry blog
Through my extensive blog reading on the right and left, watching the MSM, watching a lot of You Tube and taking in countless other political information sources I have a pretty fair grasp on the world around me and one thing that Rush taught me when I first started listening to his show (from day one) and why no other on air pundit comes close to him is he encourages his listeners to seek out the truth. Don’t simply take his word on issues, read and hear the bullshit on the left for yourself.
You should never be afraid at seeking opposing viewpoints and listening to opposing viewpoints.
This is why people who say they don’t watch Fox News are cowards and tells you everything you need to know about them intellectually.
I would never EVER, encourage anyone NOT to listen to a MSM network, a liberal talk show host, or a source like the NY Times, it’s not even logical.
Far too many people are just too fucken lazy to seek the truth on issues and choose to allow their minds to be filtered.
This is not about “standing up for” Rush, dude is a fucken multi-millionaire, he could care less what I think.
This is about simple honesty. If the goal of the left and lefty blogsphere is simply to WIN then by all means distort, lie, manipulate, conceal. Ignorance is obviously bliss in the liberal world.
Steve Gilbert of Sweetness & Light has been digging into Soros’Open Society Institute, backer of so much anti-Israeli and anti-US activities throughout the world, and in his first look(2005) finds that it received substantial sums from the Palestinians and the U.S. Government.The Palestinian contribution is understandable. But the U.S. Government?
Where was the ACLU? How come Congressman Ellison isn’t screaming about profiling. Here we go again with another example of how the PC police only cares when things are convenient for them. According to Israel National News. The US State Department was funding a business training course for middle east residents, run by the University of California (no surprise there). This program was initially open to citizens of “Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Israel (limited to Israeli Arab citizens), Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, West Bank/Gaza and Yemen.”That was of course until an Israeli Jew you checked the program out. When she saw the biased criteria, she took action via emails, and publicized this issue enough that individuals and journalists became interested too, leading to the changes made by the Beyster Institute.
Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King had a scheduled speech at an Iowa high school cancelled due to her anti-abortion stance. King insists that is not the primary focus of her message. At the same time, per link below, Martin Luther King’s youngest daughter launched a program she plans to make her life’s work in Montgomery, Alabama. Given her focus, she may also run into some trouble with Liberal groups.
DES MOINES, Iowa — The speech for an anti-abortion activist at Roosevelt High School was canceled.
Alveda King, the niece of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., spoke Wednesday about the decision.
Roosevelt’s principal canceled King’s speech after some parents complained about the message. Principal Kathie Danielson said it was a tough decision.
Here are a couple of clips from this evenings O’Reilly, the first clip had Bernard Goldberg getting to the root of the real problems facing blacks today.
The second clip you have to watch this fatass Negro hack Boyce Watkins smears Juan Williams and refers to him as a “happy Negro.” HERE and HERE are a couple of websites featuring the ghetto pimp.
Juan responds to this dude in the clip. This is what happens when you don’t conform
to the black redneck view of America
I’m telling you folks that this whole race thing is boiling over big time. I don’t know what is driving it; all I know is the Democrats are desperate and for the Democrats to take the White House that can’t leave any votes on the table.
There are some black folks who are beginning to question the white liberal Democrat establishment and the Democrats can’t stand that.
This is going to get worse before it gets better, hold on this shit is going to spin out of control and real quick.
Republicans Skip “Tavis’s” debate, do you really care?
Thursday, September 27th, 2007
Do you folks really give a shit that Republicans are not attending tonight’s debate?
Black folks vote 90% Democrat, ain’t a damm thing any Republican candidate can say that will make the race hustling pimps happy, so what would you do, go to a friendlier environment where you know people will be writing checks or go to a venue where you not only are going to get dissed, but have to hear the same ole sad black ranting bullshit, plez.
You know I have changed my stance on this, as far as I’m concerned if black folks are too fucken stupid to see that you use your vote to support your interests not to support a goddamm political party.
Yes of course I reject Democrats always have and always will, because they are a bunch of phony bastards to would rather mislead than LEAD!
Black people must find their own voice and not be lead by the nose by people like Sharpton, Jessie, Tavis.
The Republicans not attending this debate is a smart move, and I don’t expect any of them to waist their fucken time trying to appease people who already hold them in contempt.
Read these few articles below and Google the topic yourself, I’m black and if I were a Republican presidential candidate I would not attend either!
Tell the fucken Democrats to attend a debate on Fox and them we can discuss just who is dissing who. This crap just pisses me off, Negros and the liberal media are just so damm stupid!
BALTIMORE (AP) — The top four Republican presidential candidates have set off a debate over whether the GOP is paying enough attention to blacks and Hispanics by skipping Thursday night’s debate on minority issues.The four leading Republican candidates — former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Arizona Sen. John McCain and Mitt Romney — cited scheduling conflicts in saying they could not attend the debate at Morgan State University, a historically black college.
The forum, moderated by talk show host Tavis Smiley and featuring black and Hispanic journalists as panelists, was to air live on PBS.
The candidates expected to attend are all long shots for the nomination: Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, Mike Huckabee, Reps. Duncan Hunter of California, Ron Paul of Texas and Tom Tancredo of Colorado. Conservative activist Alan L. Keyes, who announced his candidacy last week, also said he would attend.
Among the Republicans who have criticized the candidates for skipping the forum are former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the first black official elected statewide.
“I’m puzzled by their decision. I can’t speak for them. I think it’s a mistake. I wish they would change their minds — they still have a few days — and I wish they would in fact go to the debate Thursday night,” Gingrich, who is considering entering the race for the GOP nomination, said earlier this week.
Smiley moderated a debate in June among the Democratic presidential candidates at Howard University in Washington, D.C., another historically black school.
Earlier this month, seven of eight Democratic candidates participated in a debate aired by Univision, the Spanish language TV network. A Univision-sponsored GOP debate was canceled after only McCain agreed to participate.
In response to complaints from Christian groups, Miller has asked for its logo to be removed. And the Folsom organizers are now disingenuously arguing that they neeeever meant to offend:
There was no intention to be particularly pro-religion or anti-religion with this poster; the image is intended only to be reminiscent of the ‘Last Supper’ painting. We hope that people will enjoy the artistry for what it is - nothing more or less. Many people choose to speculate on deeper meanings.
Democrats Will Not Leave Iraq; Their Kook Base Has Been Duped
Thursday, September 27th, 2007
There are countless blog entries commenting on the useless Democrat debate last night and I have been glancing at the news networks as well.
People these Democrat debates are pointless; it is pointless to continue to try and psychoanalyze the mindset of Democrats. None of those candidates’ exhibits the characteristics of a leader, not one of them are willing to tell the American people their true core beliefs. Democrats are completely incapable of running a campaign without massive deception.
I have been telling people for years, Mrs. Snoop can verify, not only are we NEVER leaving Iraq even if a Democrat is elected president they won’t leave either.
Now that has been confirmed, these pussy whipped Democrats see the writing on the wall, now they must change the strategy and now they must explain to the loony Democratic base this change in philosophy and mindset.
I thought Bush lied and millions dies, I thought Bush mislead the Democrats, I thought Bush lied to the American people and got us into a meaningless war.
Anywho the text below is a transcript from Rush as he goes into more details.
If I did not dislike liberals and Democrats so much, I would feel sorry for them.
RUSH: I have the San Francisco Chronicle in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers here today. It’s a story by their Washington bureauette reporter Carolyn Lochhead: “Even if Democrats Win White House, Troops Likely to Remain in Iraq.” Now, where did you first hear that, and how long ago? You first heard it on this program back in March or April. The light bulbs are starting to go off there in the Drive-By Media and with the rest of the Democrats. They’re slowly getting around to seeing the point that I was making since Monday about Mrs. Clinton’s comments about staying in Iraq after she is elected president, when she said it on George Stephanopoulos’ show. “The leading Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, steadfastly refused as recently as Sunday’s round of talk shows to promise that all U.S. forces would be withdrawn if she is elected. … Charles Kupchan, who worked in the National Security Council under President Bill Clinton…”People ask, “Rush, what’s so important about this? Of course it’s true. Why do you keep harping on it?”
My friends, let me explain why I keep harping on this to you and why it is crucial. I’m glad for the question. Sometimes I assume everybody’s on the same page with me. This is not Social Security. This is not the SCHIP program. This is not some domestic policy thing. This is about the national security of our country. It is about the defense of the United States of America. For the last four years, the Democrat Party — aided and abetted by its insane, deranged, and delusional base — has been trying to undermine US victory. They have invested in — and as you’ve heard me say, now own — the concept of defeat. All along, it has been a lie. Now, they have been trying to secure it. They have been trying to secure defeat, primarily to destroy the Bush presidency, to enable their easier ascension to the White House 2008 — and they don’t care if they destroy the country in the process. Ah, they’ll fix it when they get back in power. They have been lying to the American people, and their lies have shown up throughout the Drive-By Media, and the Drive-By Media and the fringe base have all bought the notion that the Democrats in the ‘06 election was about getting out of Iraq.
The Democrats are not going to take us out of Iraq. The reason why this is important is they have been lying to their own voters, they have been lying to the American people, and their lies have been amplified across the Drive-By Media, on an issue that matters. US national security is at the top of the list. It’s more important than Social Security reform or anything, because all that stuff’s academic if the country isn’t adequately defended against future attacks. And they have not been on the same page. They have been actively undermining that, knowing full-well that if they were in power they would do nothing different than what Bush has done, in the sense they wouldn’t pull troops out of there. They wouldn’t pull an immediate withdrawal. They wouldn’t put a date certain on it. They wouldn’t do any of this. They never have when they’ve been in the White House. Clinton never met his promised withdrawal dates out of Bosnia. FDR didn’t fight World War II this way. Well, yeah, you could say Bay of Pigs, but that was a botched operation when we got out of there. This is not a botched operation.
They’ve been trying to say that it is. So that’s the only reason I’m harping on this. I’m interested in truth, and especially on an issue like this, and if the Democrat Party is going to lie to the country and is going to have their willing accomplices in the Drive-By Media lie to the country about what Democrats actually want to do, then it’s important — because if they’re lying about this, what else are they lying about? And it’s irresponsible. So now, for some reason, Mrs. Clinton has been forced into the open and asked the question, “What will you do as president?” She could not say, “Well, I’m pulling them out of there.” She could, but it wouldn’t work. Because the bottom line is she’s not going to. She would have to pull a stunt shortly after her inauguration. “I had no idea what the Bush administration hid from me, and all of us. Why, I have been privy to information that I didn’t know. It is much, much too serious. I was in the dark. We can’t pull out,” and that would be tough.
Plus, you know, she can’t get elected if all she does is make a play for these kooks, these delusional freaks that make up the Democrat Party base. These people cannot be happy. MoveOn.org has been thrown overboard. Now Mrs. Clinton’s basically thumbed her nose at the anti-war movement and said, “Ah, we can’t pull out.” So where does the anti-war movement go? Hopefully, they will create riots at the next Democrat National Convention, like they did in 1968. And that’s not out of the realm of possibility, because these people are delusional and they are deranged, and their sole reason for existence has been to get out of Iraq and secure US defeat. And they’ve been told by their elected Democrats that that’s exactly what the Democrats are going to do, and now Mrs. Clinton just said, “You know what? I’ve been lying to you all along. I have no intention of pulling the troops out of there. Ha-ha-ha.” Now, they’re aged — these are the Sixties relics from Jurassic Park still hanging on. They can’t recruit any younger members. But we’ll see.
Recently, the ACLU set their doomsday clock at six minutes before midnight! Once it reaches the ‘dark hour’ of midnight…we will be slaves to the ominous and evil ’surviellance society’. This isn’t science fiction. This is typical scare tactics from the ACLU.They prey upon the paranoid. This is how they get donations to fund their machine. They cry about “American citizens being spied upon” when in fact there is no evidence that anyone has been hurt by the government’s terrorist surviellance program.
While the ACLU cry that they are the guardian’s of liberty, and that privacy is one of those liberties….they have been exposed as being violators of that very liberty. They have a massive database of their own member’s private financial information they use for soliciting donations.
The group’s new data collection practices were implemented without the board’s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU’s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group’s Biennial Conference in July.He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group’s Web site was changed. “They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,” Meyers said. “In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.”
Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, caused a stir at a Senate hearing Wednesday when he said he believes homosexual activity is immoral and should not be condoned by the military. Pace, who retires next week, said he was seeking to clarify similar remarks he made in spring, which he said were misreported.”Are there wonderful Americans who happen to be homosexual serving in the military? Yes,” he told the Senate Appropriations Committee during a hearing focused on the Pentagon’s 2008 war spending request.
“We need to be very precise then, about what I said wearing my stars and being very conscious of it,” he added. “And that is, very simply, that we should respect those who want to serve the nation but not through the law of the land, condone activity that, in my upbringing, is counter to God’s law.”
Anti-war protesters sitting behind Pace jeered the four-star general’s remarks, prompting Committee Chairman Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., to abruptly adjourn the hearing and seal off the doors.
The hearing resumed about five minutes later in which Pace said he would be supportive of efforts to revisit the Pentagon’s policy so long as it didn’t violate his belief that sex should be restricted to a married heterosexual couple.
“I would be very willing and able and supportive” to changes to the policy “to continue to allow the homosexual community to contribute to the nation without condoning what I believe to be activity — whether it to be heterosexual or homosexual — that in my upbringing is not right,” Pace said.
Pace’s lengthy answer on gays was prodded by Sen. Tom Harkin, who said he found Pace’s previous remarks as “very hurtful” and “very demoralizing” to homosexuals serving in the military.
In March, the Chicago Tribune reported that Pace said in a wide-ranging interview: “I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way.”
Harkin, D-Iowa, said he wanted to give Pace a chance to amend his remarks in light of his retirement.
“It’s a matter of leadership, and we have to be careful what we say,” Harkin said.
Pace noted that the U.S. Military Code of Justice prohibits homosexual activity as well as adultery. Harkin said, “Well, maybe we should change that.”
Ja Rule Challenges Congressional Meeting On Hip-Hop,
Wednesday, September 26th, 2007
“Let’s Talk About These Fucking Shows Promoting Homosexuality”
Ah another article with another ranting mad rapper talking about race, violent lyrics yada yada, yada, shit is getting uglier these days. I added the colorful words back to the article, I hate censorship! If you are offended then you sure as hell should not be reading this fucken blog! Article Link
Ja Rule recently spoke out about the upcoming U.S. Congressional hearing set to discuss the lyrical content and imagery of African-American women in hip-hop. As SOHH previously reported, the aforementioned hearing entitled “From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degradation” will take place on September 25 and will investigate media “stereotypes and degradation” of black women in hip-hop and the entertainment industry.Top industry executives including Philippe Dauman of Viacom, Doug Morris of Universal Music Group, Edgar Bronfman, Jr. of Warner Music Group and music mogul Master P are expected to appear as witnesses in the hearing.
In a recent interview with Complex magazine, Ja Rule offered his objections to the hearings.
“They got my man Doug Morris under fire and shit, they got him going down to go speak to Congress about hip-hop lyrics, are you fucking serious?” Ja said. “There’s a fucking black kid right now about to get 25 years for having a fight with some white kids over hanging the nooses over the white tree, let’s get to that. Let’s get into shit like that, because that’s what’s tearing up America, not me calling a woman a bitch or a hoe on my rap songs.”"And if it is, then we need to go step to Paramount, and fucking MGM, and all of these other motherfuckers that’s making all of these movies and we need to go step to MTV and Viacom, and lets talk about all these fucking shows that they have on MTV that is promoting homosexuality, that my kids can’t watch this shit,” he continued. “Dating shows that’s showing two guys or two girls in mid-afternoon. Let’s talk about shit like that! If that’s not fucking up America, I don’t know what is.”
“There’s a lot of issues we can address besides hip-hop, but they want to put everything on us like we’re the problem,” Ja added. “This is going to be a shameless fucking plug, but I said, ‘when everyone wants to point the finger, and ask why there’s so much corruption, they only need to look in the mirror.’ It starts with themselves.”
Ok now I don’t want y’all to get the wrong idea here but in defense of rap, dude is correct on some of this. The porn industry, run by white people takes in billions of dollars, we have a show on Showtime called “Weeds”, a white suburban chick who sells weed to her white friends, in her white community. The BAD people are all of the minorities. The drug dealers are the blacks and the Mexicans! Dexter a white dude who is a fucken serial killer, on Oprah yesterday she had this crazy ass couple talking about open marriage, again the majority of these people engaging in this crazy shit is white folks.
Many shows now feature a gay character and 9 times out of 10 the gay character is a minority!
Few shows even attempt to cast a NORMAL black man or woman as the main character.
The majority of rap and hip hop music is purchased by white kids; you think there are enough young black kids out there able to buy enough music to make these crazy bastards as wealthy as they are?
All of these nasty ass sadistic slasher movies and shows like Jackass featuring the most repugnant and ignorant crazy shit you can think of and people love that retarded shit.
Yes, rappers need to take some responsibility but to single them out is just fucken disingenuous.
Black people don’t own shit, black folks don’t even own BET, name the network, radio broadcast network, delivery system, video game production, internet broadcast, movie production studio, porn production, they are all own by white people hellooooooo!
Putting all of this degradation of society on a few rappers is just bullshit, but we need a scapegoat and who better than a bunch of loud, gold tooth ranting faux street thugs.
Since race is at the forefront this week, here is something I found this on one of the Negro gossip blogs. I was in tears laughing at this shit. Negros are pissed at this skank. Ya see white folks you need to leave this kinda stuff to me, you just can’t say this shit. LOL!
Adrianne Curry, winner of America’s Next Top Model Cycle one, said she is boycotting BET and Black History Month in a recent post to her MySpace blog.
In the rambling post, Curry said she loved BET but ” I do not believe in separating ANY race in America. We are Americans! How dare we have Black History Month.”
Unaware of the months dedicated to Asian Americans, Hispanics, and American Indians, Curry added “I think by having a month dedicated to one race, and not one for any other, is RACIST. Every fund set up only help people of one race is SICK and RACIST.”
Here are Adrianne Curry’s exact words:
This is gonna be hard guys. I LOVE the comedians on BET. I also LOVE the fact that they play my favorite show of all time, In Living Color. However, I do not believe in seperating [sic] ANY RACE in America. WE ARE AMERICANS! How dare we have Black History Month! In my eyes, the Native Americans deserve it MUCH more, seeing how we destroyed their ENTIRE SOCIETY. There are hardly any of them left! They also have been proven to have the WORST living conditions on their reservations. I want AN AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH. One where we learn about EVERY race, ALL OF OUR LEADERS, EVERYONE! I think by having a month dedicated to one race, and not one for any other, is RACIST. Every fund set up to only help people of one race is SICK and RACIST.
Yes, I get it. Black people were slaves here once. You know what? That does suck some major b*lls, however, it is time to move the f*ck on. Do we hear the Jews crying that they were made slaves for thousands of years? Do we hear them whine that they should OWN the pyramids in Egypt because THEY broke their backs making them? Do we hear them bitch and moan about Hitler, etc? (my hubby is a Jew) Nope, we dont. It’s time for us to UNITE AS ONE. I do not think that singling out one race, giving one race opportunities to go to college (I know a TON of poor white.asian, indian, american indian, etc etc that could use that too!), giving one race the EXCUSE to blame things on others for being whatever nationality they are, is a good way at making sure we NEVER kill racism.
I am over this shit. WE ALL CAME FROM ONE BLACK WOMAN FROM AFRICA, THAT is our EVE! It has been proven by science, and I stand by it. If any other race had a chanel [sic] dedicated to just them, we would think it was racist. If any other race demanded a month be set aside for ONLY them, they would be considered racist. I am NOT living by this double standard any longer.
Think I am racist? I am not. I know what racism is. I dated a guy named “Justin” in Junior high. Nothing serious, but I really liked him. He was the blackest of black. …BEAUTIFUL skin, kinda like Alex Wek’s. He was handsome, and athletic, etc. I was called a [N Word] lover. But you know what? I was called that by a whole 2 people out of a school with HUNDREDS of students. THAT is why I am NOT buying this racist shit anymore. Let us teach or children that there is NO DIFFERENCE! We are all human. I hope one day aliens land and try to kill us. Maybe THEN we would finally realize that WE are ONE.
So, I will no longer tune into BET. This is going to suck, but I do NOT like the idea of having a chanel for only 1 race. In the year 2007 in a country that is supposed to be the most advanced and equal. This is unexceptable! [sic] I will also no longer acknowledge Black History Month. Instead, I will see it the way that Morgan Freeman does (I have the quote at the bottom of my last blog on Obama/jesseJackson, and OJ). AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH! I will read/watch/and learn about ALL the people who made a difference in this country.
I am asking you ALL to join me. Black, White, Indian, Asian, Russian, Australian, etc etc…..lets be AMERICANS together! What happened to the African American community was AMERICAN HISTORY, not BLACK HISTORY. If you want to celebrate in a way that excludes others and singles one race out, count me the FUCK out! I am soooo proud to be an American. I am SO proud that I have friends of every race, and none of us see each other as anything but what we are..people. Lets change Black History Month to 2 months of AMERICAN HISTORY. We will still learn about all the black leaders and people who made a difference….just not with the racist name of “Black History Month”. It has to start somewhere. I am going to do my part in making sure we are all treated EQUAL in a country that CLAIMS we are. NO MORE SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR ANYONE WITH ANYTHING!
It will never happen. At least, that is what many of you will say…FINE! My number one priority here is being able to die and know that I stood up for what I believed in, and that I did not add to the SEPERATION OF AMERICANS!! I love my country, I love the people in it. I love our history, good and bad. We should LEARN from it,not dwell in it and not move forward. That’s why I am done with this shit. You are all my brothers and sisters…..even if I think you suck ; ) As Bono said, “One life, with each other..sisters…brothers!”
Found this article via a link on Instapundit. Yes the MSM and PAID “journalists” hates the fact that crazy people like myself, simple working stiffs, with a degree from the University of Lexapro may have something the say and although my audience is small and likely to be as mentally deranged as I am for reading my rants just pisses them off to no end.
Let’s face it bloggers are fucking with their livelihood er uh money!
I love blogging and I love checking out what working stiff like me have to say. When I want more seasoned commentary I go to the Thomas Sowell’s the Mona Charen’s the Walter William’s of the world.
Bloggers and journalists can co-exist; the problem with journalists is because of the rise of blogging that can’t get away with being the lazy partisan (mostly liberal) fucks they have been in the past.
Bloggers regardless of political persuasion or interest have one thing journalists lack PASSION!
Bloggers are not guided by the fairy tale notion that young journalists cling to; “I want to be a journalist to change the world.” GAG!
I’m not trying to change the world; I just need to vent about a few things to keep from running you people off the road! LOL!
I was to present the Pew Center’s findings about the future of the Internet this week, but it will have to wait.Instead I must address the misbegotten musings of author Andrew Keen, who appeared on the PBS “Newshour” a week ago Monday, promoting his new book “The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture.”Keen, a British-American, has criticized Web 2.0 — the so-called second generation of popular Web-based communities and services — as something that “worships the creative amateur: the self-taught filmmaker, the dorm-room musician, the unpublished writer. It suggests that everyone — even the most poorly educated and inarticulate amongst us — can and should use digital media to express and realize themselves. Web 2.0 ‘empowers’ our creativity, it ‘democratizes’ media, it ‘levels the playing field’ between experts and amateurs. The enemy of Web 2.0 is ‘elitist’ traditional media.”
For me, the most outlandish thing Keen said in his appearance on the “Newshour” was, “The Internet has 70 million blogs … no one cares what you had for breakfast.”
This dismissal of blogging is wildly off the mark.
I understand where he is coming from. Lately many elite journalists have been attacking blogs, especially politically liberal blogs, as “vitriolic,” “rabid” and “crude.” Keen went to great pains to offer the “real” journalism of the Wall St. Journal, the New York Times, and the Washington Post as examples of what blogging is not.
He said on the “Colbert Report” last month that “I think we need objective, professional journalists who responsibly collect the news rather than anonymous bloggers often in the pay of corporations and foreign governments. That’s the crisis.”
Keen here is being disingenuous and paranoid, as many are who criticize blogging. Successful bloggers are far from anonymous.
What’s more, Keen is conflating the anonymous blog commentators with the well-known blog authors who run the Web sites. He derides the democratization of this freewheeling commentariat, considering it drivel.
Here I have to agree with him. Many of the comments posted on blog sites can be inane, but on some of the finer blogs the comments are well worth wading through. Not only can they be intelligent, but they also often draw the original authors back into the fray to defend their positions.
When Andrew Keen attacks bloggers, saying, “No one wants to know what you had for breakfast,” he’s ignoring the fact that many bloggers are professional journalists, and many others come to the party perfectly well-equipped to promulgate an idea or construct an opinion. Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo has been published in Time; Duncan Black of Eschaton has a Ph.D. in Economics; Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos is an Army veteran, an accomplished pianist, and boasts a law degree from Boston College; libertarian Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit teaches law at Tennessee; Glenn Greenwald of Salon is a veteran constitutional lawyer; and conservative Atlantic Monthly blogger Andrew Sullivan is the former editor of the New Republic.
Often these bloggers not only add to the debate but also provide fact filters that catch our “professional” journalists when they’re lazy, inaccurate or just plain dishonest. Andrew Keen and the rest of the elitists can’t abide this and want the hoi polloi to be kept in its place.
The Internet adds to our wealth of information. We simply need to assess it critically, as we should any information source.
A Los Angeles man is showcasing what he considers the city’s worst drivers on his website.
After visiting LA a few months ago, I astonished by the not only the rudeness of L.A drivers but the level of utter stupidity of a great many of them.
This place is just fucked, with the mass amounts of clueless foreign drivers not to mention illegal drives and lets not forget the road full of So. Cal bimbos and of course the over abundance of narcissistic psych ward candidates it’s a recipe for disaster.
Oh don’t hate on ole Snoop for the criticism, I was born there. I thank God all the time that my parents were smart enough to get the fuck away from there.
This is a brief segment on a program via BET called Hip Hop vs America. I was going to write something on this, but I’m tired. As I said before I feel beat down. I can’t explain the logic of Negros you figure it out.
Our race baiting hero Al Sharpton is on here and basically he says fuck what whitey thinks of you. If you want to portray yourself as a bunch of ignorant ass ghetto minstrels, screw white America, you just be yourself.
I’m like fuck it, whatever.
Here is the initial segment on O’Reilly tonight (Tuesday) he talks about how he was hammered by Media Matters as being racist.
I’m posting this mainly because I listened to the segment he talks about and the fact that Media Matters and CNN are again doing news race baiting crap is reprehensible.
You know there are a significant number of liberal blogs who use Media Matters as sources for much of the bullshit you read on liberal blogs. As a watcher and listener of O’Reilly and of Rush I find much of the bullshit I see on Media Matters as simply amusing and absurd.
I have said this countless times and I will continue to say until one day Lord willing I have a national format to express my views. The problem of race in this country stems from liberalism and it’s in the best interest of liberals that race continue to be at the forefront to be used as a political tool to keep people ignorant, confused and angry.
Also I watched this evening a forum on ESPN, a town hall meeting discussing Michael Vick. Mostly the same old retread bullshit mostly.
Now if this forum were held in a locale with an intelligent and respectful audience that would be one thing.
However what you had was a bunch of ignorant ass Negros in the audience and showing out many wearing Michael Vick jerseys cackling at any voiced opinion that basically called out Michael Vick for committing a FELLONY and acting like another ignorant ass clueless black athlete and doing what way too many black rednecks do and say, “well what about whitey?”
The reason why many of you white people on the left are clueless about race issues in this nation is exactly because you get your information and talking points from sources like CNN and Media Matters, you only receive one part of the story and unless you read blogs or opinion columns by righteous black folks willing to tell it like it is you remain in the dark and you will no doubt make the assumption that all Negros think the same.
But let me be real here, although race issues have greatly improved in this nation, idiot ass liberal crackas on the left will do whatever they can to keep racism on the front burner for political gain and precisely because O’Reilly, Rush and countless other conservative commentators are on the top of the ratings heap they need racial angst and tensions high.
Homosexuals Mock ‘Last Supper’ With Sex-Toys Twist
Tuesday, September 25th, 2007
.
(CNSNews.com) - Organizers of San Francisco’s Folsom Street Fair — sponsored by Miller Brewing Co. — have portrayed Christ and his disciples as half-naked homosexual sadomasochists in the event’s promotional advertisement, and the conservative group Concerned Women for America is complaining about the hypocrisy of it.”The bread and wine representing Christ’s broken body and lifegiving blood are replaced with sadomasochistic sex toys in this twisted version of Da Vinci’s The Last Supper,” CWA said on its Web site.
“‘Gay’ activists disingenuously call Christians ‘haters’ and ‘homophobes’ for honoring the Bible, but then lash out in this hateful manner toward the very people they accuse,” said said Matt Barber, CWA’s policy director for cultural issues.
“In their version of The Last Supper, Christ, Who gave His life for our sins, is despicably replaced by sin itself as the object of worship.”
CWA is calling on California politicians — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sens. Feinstein and Boxer among them — to “publicly condemn this unprovoked attack against Christ and His followers.
“We further challenge the media to cover this affront to Christianity with the same vigor as recent stories about cartoon depictions of Mohammed and other items offensive to the Muslim community,” CWA said.
The Folsom Street Fair describes itself as “the world’s largest leather event.”
“We hope to see the fairgrounds filled with people in their most outrageous leather/rubber/fetish attire enjoying the worlds largest and best loved Leather fair,” the Web site says.
Concerned Women for America called it “shocking and offensive” that California taxpayers are forced to foot part of the bill for the Folsom Street Fair. The City of San Francisco sanctions the event by shutting down several city blocks and providing police for security.
The Folsom Street Fair Web site says young people are welcome: “While we don’t have any age restrictions at the gates we do inform attendees of the adult oriented nature of our events.” The fair organizers say beer and liquor age restrictions are strictly enforced.
San Francisco drove the Marines away, but the latest attempt to kick out the Blue Angels has failed:
San Francisco Supervisor Chris Daly’s hopes of halting the U.S. Navy’s Blue Angels show from performing its aerial acrobatics over the city during Fleet Week crashed today when the board of supervisors failed the resolution.
Supervisors voted down the resolution just before 2:30 p.m. Newly appointed interim Supervisor Carmen Chu, who attended her first meeting today as the representative for District 4, voted against the resolution.
It is painful — and dangerous — how little we learn from history, even when it is recent history.Just a year ago, “rape” charges spread lynch-mob hysteria on the campus of Duke University and in much of the liberal media, while professional race hustlers descended on the town of Durham, North Carolina, and mindless tribalism was stirred up by extremists in the local black community.This year, we have all learned what a total fraud that case was, from beginning to end. Yet now we see a similar outburst of mindless tribalism and another attempt at mob rule, promoted by such veterans of last year’s hysteria as Jesse Jackson.
This time the scene is in Jena, Louisiana. The issue is the prosecution of a black high school student accused of stomping on an unconscious white student — and the lack of criminal prosecution of white students who hung a noose on a tree, who were disciplined by the school.
Liberals’ skills at moral equivalence have been so finely honed during the long years of the Cold War that they have turned this into a case of “unequal treatment,” based on race — as if putting a noose on a tree is equivalent to stomping somebody who is unconscious.
The black student was found guilty but the verdict was overturned on appeal — not on grounds that he was not guilty, but on grounds that the appellate court did not think he should have been tried as an adult.
The usual legal procedure would be to try the student again, but this time not as an adult. However, the usual legal procedures are not good enough for those who have once again seized the opportunity to hype race — and to hell with questions of guilt or innocence or legal procedures.
The immediate demand of the mobs that have been mobilized around the country to descend on the small town of Jena is that the young man found guilty of a serious crime of violence should be free on bail pending a second trial.
The legal question is whether letting someone accused of such a crime go free on bail is likely to mean that he will not be around long enough for a second trial. But no one is seriously debating that.
Racial hype has replaced all rational discussion. Moreover, the Jena episode has shown that two can play the racial hype game. Neo-Nazis have published the names and home addresses of all the young blacks involved in the school incident.
The slogan “No justice, no peace” has been used to justify settling legal issues in the streets, instead of in courts of law.
Neo-Nazis have now helped demonstrate what a dangerous slogan that is, since different people have opposite ideas of what “justice” is in a given situation.
Long after the imported demonstrators have left, and the national media have lost interest, the families of the black youngsters involved in the school altercation will have to live with the knowledge that their privacy and security have both been lost in a racially polarized community, with vengeful elements.
The last thing the South needs is a return to lynch-mob justice, whatever the color of whoever is promoting it.
Back in the 1950s, when the federal courts began striking down the Jim Crow laws in the South, one of the rising demands across the country was that the discriminators and segregationists obey “the law of the land.”
But, somewhere along the way, the idea also arose and spread that not everybody was supposed to obey “the law of the land.”
Violations of law by people with approved victim status like minorities, or self-righteous crusaders like environmentalists, were to be met with minimal resistance — if any resistance at all — and any punishment of them beyond a wrist-slap was “over-reacting.”
College campuses became bastions of the new and sanctified mob rule, provided that the mobs are from the list of groups approved as politically correct. Otherwise, even an injudicious remark could bring swift and certain punishment under “speech codes.”
The politics of condoned law-breaking is part of the moral dry rot of our times. So is settling issues in the streets on the basis of race, instead of in courts on the basis of law.
Let’s say you’re at Logan International Airport, the very same airport in which half of the 9-11 hijackers met on that fateful day to begin their carnage. You’re minding your own business when someone walks by holding something in their hand that looks like C4 that is hooked up to something that looks like a circuit board on the back of their hoodie by a bunch of wires. The words “Socket To Me” are written on the back of the hoodie. She’s also making a spectacle of herself while at the airport.
What would your first reaction be?
MIT’s Star Simpson did just that, for “Career Day” at school (she had been wearing the ensemble to campus for the previous few days). She was then shocked when she was promptly surrounded by airport security wielding machine guns, and then found herself in jail.
Simpson told authorities she was “surprised” she landed in jail. After all, she wrote on her Web site that she spends her free time “saving the planet from evil villains” and loves “crazy ideas.”There is absolutely nothing artistic about scaring people in public places, even if her father, Hugh Simpson, told the Maui News in Star’s native Hawaii that he was “proud” of his daughter. Then he boasted that his daughter went to a park after she was freed on $750 bail to “stretch her arms because she had been in a small room for hours and hours.”I hope she gets used t
Ok folks I usually don’t post on the weekends, I try to take a break and chill and avoid politics and other crap on the weekends.
