Some people need to get a life
Here is an e-mail comment from a You Tube user who was persistent and kept e-mailing me so that I would commit to debate her about Rosie’s video diatribe or anything else political.
I received countless e-mails from individuals like her, who are offended by my offensive language and name calling and “juvenile” responses.
Ever since I have had this damm blog up and my You Tube videos I get these e-mail responses from people as if they have some responsibility to God almighty to reform or sensor me.
People, I don’t get it, I don’t understand the need for people to send me responses to complain about what (I) am saying.
Do I not have freedom of speech? Am I not entitled to say whatever the fuck I want on my own blog?
If this were my house, am I not entitled to scratch my balls, fart, belch, pee in the shower if need be without being micromanaged by a bunch of sad sack people who don’t have shit else to do besides try to shape the people of the world in their own image.
I have NEVER e-mailed anybody because I wanted them to change their opinion, to change the way they said something, to suggest that the “should have not said that” or maybe you should look at your position another way, because frankly I don’t dive a fuck why you came to the conclusion you did on anything because I don’t know you, I don’t know your particular view of life, what you have experienced, your trials and tribulations.
Do I not have the right to be wrong? Do I not have the right to make a fucken idiot out of myself as long as it does not affect anyone or cause them harm?
Am I not allowed to use the screen name Snoop, can I indeed be black, can I indeed be conservative? Am I not allowed to call people I disagree with a fucken idiot until they have proven otherwise, even if it does not meet your approval?
I am posting the response of this individual who obviously did not have shit else to do but to bother me. All the fucken people on You Tube, all the fucken people who have blogs for some reason I solicited the pestering responses.
So I had Mrs. Snoop respond to her, but that still was not enough as she claimed I did not like or was scared of strong women.
You know what examples of strong women she gave (Hillary, Rosie, Janeane Garofalo, Martha Stewart).
Lets review shall we Hillary trying to become president on the momentum of her husband. Rosie a fat retard with the mental capacity of a 10 year old, Garofalo? A comic hack and liberal activist who failed as did every other liberal on Air America.
Martha Stewart, she is a damm decorating queen, why would I give a damm!?
Does this individual not get how egotistical, elitist and self centered she must be as to try and lecture me on my decorum and my way of thinking and my way of expressing myself?
This blog is not to win over people or try to influence them; this blog is about ME, my feeling and opinions. If you have a problem with it, then fuck off, seriously people get a clue.
If you want to change the world for the better, go feed the homeless, go tutor some children, join Habitat for Humanity, work in an after school program, go call a long lost relative, write a letter to your mother or father.
If you for a second believe that writing some dude name Snoop and chastising him for his online demeanor is the best use of your time, then you really have a screwed up life and professional help is in order.
Read the e-mail below
Good to hear from you, Mrs. Snoop. You appear to be a reasonable and well spoken woman. A strong woman indeed to tolerate Mr. Snoop’s caustic and discriminatory views of much of society. You made a comment that I feel I need to address first off - you wrote” carry on with the name calling if that is how have fun” - I’m not sure if your husband shared with you my previous emails but I can assure you I’m not about assaulting someone with vulgar names and obscenities - it really doesn’t prove much does it?… just a tactic often used by hot-tempered people who can’t conjure up an intelligent thought to support their so called beliefs…
Now, I’m sure you have stood over your husband’s shoulder to skim over what he is typing on his blog from time to time and I’m sure you have come across such barnyard comments such as…
“So cheers to the idiot fuck, from your friendly 43 year old, Nigga who calls himself Snoop!”
“These fucken jackasses are a bunch of lunatics.”
“I swear you damm liberals are a bunch of retarded asses, what the fuck.”
“Hey jackass, ” - that was your husband’s first response to me…
(Sigh)…well, Mrs.. Snoop…I think you get the idea…you mentioned in your response to me “If you’d like to actually discuss something, try to give FACTS (not opinions or wild conjecture based upon incomplete information) that can be double checked.” I beleive I just gave you some hard core facts…from the horse himself…it can even be double checked…
Listen, I have done my homework…I have read through many of his blog entries and I haven’t been won over by his ranting. His statements are abusive and really don’t have a very solid factual basis…even on the few things I do agree on with Mr. Snoops. Look, I don’t agree with everything Rosie discusses…but that is just it - at least she discusses ideas and has some sort of knowledge into the very core of the matter - whether she is right or wrong.
Here’s another example: I don’t agree with Mary Matlin’s political issues but I admire her for her intellectual integrity and asute insights. She is well spoken and tactful, no matter how hot the topic of discussion is. Mr. Snoops could learn a lot from Mary Matlin on how to debate an issue fairly and to be respectful at the same time.
Mr.. Snoops treats politics like a sport - show up at the game and see who can be the most obnoxious and cuss at the offensive team the loudest. All poise and no tact.
I’m not even quite sure why I decided a couple days ago to reply to his youtube comment on Rosie “you suck” - I should of known not to expect much…
So, you are an attorney…well, then I would assume you would know what a good debate requires…facts, intellect, acuteness, shrewdness, and the willingness to take risks…not to bombard your opponent with vulgarities - they too would soon grow tried with your juvenile bullying…correct?
Well, I have spent too much time on this already - Good Luck to you Mrs. Snoops.
janepepper - You Tube Profile
Sphere: Related Content



![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://politicalpartypoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png)
April 10th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
“…assaulting someone with vulgar names and obscenities…just a tactic often used by hot-tempered people who can’t conjure up an intelligent thought to support their so called beliefs…”
Bitch.
April 10th, 2007 at 2:09 pm
For the record, Mr. Snoop, your responder does not appreciate that your blog is a place where fire melts steel. Like, throughout history and all.
..
April 10th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Sigh. Poor woman. How frustrating it must be to keep losing the babies with the bath water….
I didn’t say that I didn’t understand how someone might like like Mr. Snoop’s way of expressing himself, let alone his views. However, she apparently jumped the logic train tracks by jumping from the fact that HE engages in name calling to the point where SHE could change his mind by doing like-wise. If all she and he want to do is exchange “pleasantries” (i.e. engage in name calling), God Speed to all concerned. Not my style, but I “get” my husband’s humor.
However, since it appeared (somewhat) that she intended to convince him of his errors and her correct opinions, then it would have behooved her to conduct herself in a manner different then his “sport” of baiting the liberals. So typical; pick out one tiny flaw and pretend that IT was the real or whole message. Sigh.
Her main point - to which I was responding - was that he did not like strong women. I refuted that comment pretty thouroughly. So to what did she reply? Not that issue, you can be sure!
April 10th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
Here’s some factual and reasonable debate for you, JanePepper—how long have you *been* on the Internet? Have you not yet deduced that there are many varying degrees of content on said ‘net? One can, quite literally, customize one’s browsing experience to yield only that content which one finds acceptable, civil, and in line with one’s views both politically and in matters of conduct. When one stumbles across content that one finds unacceptable, well, they are perfectly free to go elsewhere.
The Internet is not a continent of cannibal heathens, and the Reader is not a Bible-waving missionary. Those who treat both it and themselves in such a manner will inevitably be frustrated, if not thrown in the pot and served for brunch.
Twat.
April 10th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
Sure, but can she cook?
April 12th, 2007 at 7:54 pm
“Strong women”, my ass. For one, being a complete asshat =! being strong or even confrontational. Rosie, Hillary, Garafalo, etc. are just asshats. And Mrs. Snoop and JanePepperare just above and beyond asshattery.
Try Condaleeza Rice or Michelle Malkin instead. Or not…according to Malkin: “Some women are more equal than others, in the eyes of the “progressive” female blogosphere…Because we have “betrayed” feminism, because we hold unorthodox political views on abortion, government race/gender preferences, education, the war, and taxes, and because we reject identity politics, we’re not “authentic” women, we deserve what we get, and we just don’t count.”
Girls, just so you know: the Internet is not High School. There is no such thing here as In-Crowd/Out-Crowd, where the In-Crowd have to be carbon copies of each other. (And even the Out-Crowd, at times…all the dedicated weirdos in high school (”feminist-vegan-bicurious-punk-goth-whatevers) all seem to look and act and think the same, for that matter) Different people really are different, not just one cheerleader wears Sketchers while another wears Prada. Now quit whining, put on your big-girl panties, and deal with it.