politicalpartypoop.com

Damm I don’t know how I missed this, below is an article that was published in an Asian publication about why this dude hates black folks.
People are getting bent out of shape about this piece but I’m like who gives a shit. This is America, you are free to hate whoever the hell you want, DAMM!

Let me let you in on a secret, a good many black folks don’t like Asian folks, and many Asian folks don’t like black folks.

Some of what dude says in this article was told to me by some Asian dudes back when I was in grade school.
I remember reading an article many years ago about this Japanese executive who wanted to build an auto plant but was afraid that he would be forced to hire uneducated and unqualified blacks. So for a few years black folks stopped buying Japanese cars.

Most Asians a xenophobic as hell, but this is not new but on the other hand black folks would be quick to throw out the ching, chong, ching bullshit i.e Rosie O’Donnell.
Because of the clashes with black folks and Koreans in the hood that bitterness is not likely to go away any time soon.

I grew up in the Bay Area I had a few “Asian” friends, (yes it sounds silly) Eugene Lee, Clifford Fong and my man Richard Chinn one of the funniest dudes growing up. 
There were several girls growing up in my neighborhood that I wanted to date but their dads would have none of that shit. BASTARDS!

But as much as they may hate each other, black folks still will buy from Asian folks and likewise Asian folks are quick to set-up shop in the hood too. Green is the more important color.

Hell now Japanese folks are dressing up like rap stars wearing FUBU and gold chains.
Crazy ain’t it. 
 

****

By Kenneth Eng, Feb 23, 2007

Here is a list of reasons why we should discriminate against blacks, starting from the most obvious down to the least obvious:

• Blacks hate us. Every Asian who has ever come across them knows that they take almost every opportunity to hurl racist remarks at us.

In my experience, I would say about 90 percent of blacks I have met, regardless of age or environment, poke fun at the very sight of an Asian. Furthermore, their activity in the media proves their hatred: Rush Hour, Exit Wounds, Hot 97, etc.

• Contrary to media depictions, I would argue that blacks are weak-willed. They are the only race that has been enslaved for 300 years. It’s unbelievable that it took them that long to fight back.

On the other hand, we slaughtered the Russians in the Japanese-Russo War.

• Blacks are easy to coerce. This is proven by the fact that so many of them, including Reverend Al Sharpton, tend to be Christians.  ah man that’s cold, linking me with Al “Thurmond” Sharpton

Yet, at the same time, they spend much of their time whining about how much they hate “the whites that oppressed them.”

Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t Christianity the religion that the whites forced upon them?

• Blacks don’t get it. I know it’s a blunt and crass comment, but it’s true. When I was in high school, I recall a class debate in which one half of the class was chosen to defend black slavery and the other half was chosen to defend liberation.

Disturbingly, blacks on the prior side viciously defended slavery as well as Christianity. They say if you don’t study history, you’re condemned to repeat it.

In high school, I only remember one black student ever attending any of my honors and AP courses. And that student was caught cheating.

It is rather troubling that they are treated as heroes, but then again, whites will do anything to defend them.

Here are some links talking about this issue:

Asian weekly’s “Why I Hate Blacks” columnist suspended

Act Against Racist AsianWeek Article

Asian American Leaders Criticize AsianWeek

From the blog Conservative Thought 

The African-American support of Barak Obama is either positive or negative; depending on which MSM report you read.  First we have this from CNN today written by Candy Crowley and Sasha Johnson.  

Obama getting a cool reception from black America.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Polls suggest whites are more likely than blacks to say America is ready for a black president, which may be part of why much of the African-American community is cool to the presidential candidacy of Sen. Barack Obama.

On the very same day we find this in Washington Post.

Keep reading →

But first… Let me peep you white folks on something.
Anytime you see any poll talking about black folks views or support on anything just flat dismiss it.

First of all if some pollster called a black household, we all think it s bill collector so we ain’t answering the phone.

Second, if some white person were to come up to our door (pollster) and we don’t know who they are or where they are from we ain’t answering the door and even if someone does we sure as hell are not going to give you our REAL thoughts on any issue.
Unless some pollster takes their asses to a barber or beauty shop you will never know what black folks are thinking about any given issue and we sure as hell won’t give the straight scoop to any white person we don’t know.

ANY media story talking about blacks are favoring one candidate over another is just plain bullshit, pay no attention.
Black folks are gonna vote Democrat period so who they support now is pointless. But I can tell you this Obama has no shot at being president, this country is not ready for a black president I don’t give a shit what TV pundits, newspapers and other white “so-called” political gurus say. 
Black folks know this, so what would be the point of telling some white pollster or news reporter that they are supporting his candidacy for president?
Hell, I’m still reading crazy shit on some black news sites that dude is not “black” enough, so all of this is just plain stupid, hence the confusion with the coverage.

I’m a 40-something black Republican, have been registered Republican since I was 18, and I have NEVER been polled or asked my opinion on any topic, issue or political candidate. So I sure as hell don’t give much credence to some bullshit poll numbers.  

Click on Photo to View

Gathering of Eagles
ANSWER: Behind the placards
Move America Forward
March 17 Moonbat March I’m in DC that weekend, YIPEE!

Top World Net Daily story: ACLU exec busted for child porn in court today

A former American Civil Liberties Union executive, who once argued that Internet filters in libraries that limited children’s access to pornography would interfere with their ability to learn and communicate, is facing a federal court hearing today on charges he possessed child pornography.

The preliminary hearing is scheduled in court in the Eastern District of Virginia for Charles Rust-Tierney, 51, of Arlington, Va., who has been held in custody in the case since his arrest. According to report on the case, Rust-Tierney admitted to investigators he had downloaded videos and images from child pornography websites onto CD-ROMS, which reportedly depicted graphic forcible assaults on young girls.

Rust-Tierney, who served as president of the Virginia ACLU chapter for several years, was the lawyer who argued against Internet filters in libraries in the early 2000s when the ACLU was opposing the Children’s Internet Protection Act, which later was approved by Congress.

Big Bubba, everyone’s favorite cellmate is fluffing your pillow, sicko.

more at Stop the ACLU

AP: ACLU defends terror supporters’ right to U.S. access

NEW YORK (AP) — A civil rights group asked a judge Friday to find it unconstitutional for the federal government to exclude a prominent Muslim scholar or anyone else from the United States on the grounds that they may have endorsed or espoused terrorism.

In case it didn’t sink in the first time:

NEW YORK (AP) — A civil rights group asked a judge Friday to find it unconstitutional for the federal government to exclude a prominent Muslim scholar or anyone else from the United States on the grounds that they may have endorsed or espoused terrorism.

Got it?

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the papers attacking the policy in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The group included in its submissions a written declaration in which the scholar, Tariq Ramadan, said he has always “opposed terrorism not only through my words but also through my actions.”

The ACLU said schools and organizations who want to invite Ramadan and others into the United States are concerned about what is known as the ideological exclusion provision.

It said an entry in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual says that the provision is directed at those who have voiced “irresponsible expressions of opinion.”

As a sovereign nation, the United States has the right to bar anyone for any reason entry to our country. Advocating Islamic terrorism is probably at the top of the list of good reasons.

Read the rest at Stop the ACLU

A couple of posts via Conservative Grapevine

Right Thinking Girl: Lesbian adopts lover as her daughter in gay marriage loophole.

***

Redstate: Global warming: A picture is worth 10,000 long winded explanations.  

***

Oh and this funny video (below) made by some wacko liberals, this from Hot Air

***

Yeah, Patty Murray. Who once said the reason Bin Laden’s such a rock star in the Muslim world is because of his famous daycare-building initiatives. Who also, of course, voted against the war in 2002, but who isn’t doing everything she can now to defund the war immediately. Which brings us to our video.

It was shot a few days ago at a public appearance she made with some local police chiefs. The Sheehan crowd’s energized because a bill calling for Bush’s impeachment has been introduced in the Washington state senate and will be given a public hearing on Thursday. The moonbats are expected to be out in force to pressure the legislature into passing it and hopefully start a chain reaction in other blue states cuminating in the mother of all political headaches for Nancy Pelosi (and Hillary, Obama, etc). If she thinks she has a problem with the Blue Dogs now, imagine trying to remove the C-in-C in the middle of the surge.

As for our Patty, she’s as bright as ever:

Murray spokeswoman Alex Glass confirmed that Murray told Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown last week that the impeachment resolution was a bad idea:

“Senator Murray’s message was, ‘I have two words for anyone who wants to impeach the President: Dick Cheney.’”

Um, the Washington bill calls for Cheney’s impeachment, too.

Read the article if you care, but this silliness is getting way out of hand

WASHINGTON (AP) — National Democrats on Tuesday urged Republican Party chairman Mel Martinez to stop the independent College Republicans from holding “Catch an Illegal Immigrant” events around the country.

Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean and Ramona Martinez, chair of the Democratic National Committee’s Hispanic caucus, sent a letter to the GOP chairman asking him to put a halt to the events.

“These despicable tactics have no place in our public discourse or on our college campuses,” the letter said.

The game is a variation of hide and seek, with one player posing as an illegal immigrant and everyone else trying to find the person. The winner usually gets a prize.

Tracy Schmitt, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, said “we find these activities both egregious and offensive and condemn them wholeheartedly.” But she noted the College Republicans are independent of the RNC: “We do not control their activities.”

Democrats sent a similar letter to chairman Martinez’s predecessor Ken Mehlman in September last year, noting that College Republicans were holding similar “catch an illegal immigrant” events in Pennsylvania and Texas. The RNC condemned the activities at the time.

The DNC noted that the game was recently played at New York University and drew several hundred students. Students at other colleges also have played the game.

NKorea capable of building a missile ‘that can hit the USA’… 

By Dawn Kawamoto
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
 

A variant of the Trojan horse attacks known as Storm Worm emerged Monday, targeting people who post blogs and notices to bulletin boards.

Storm Worm emerged in January and raged across the globe in the form of e-mails with attachments that, when opened, loaded malicious software onto victims’ PCs, commandeering the machines so they could be used for further attacks.

The new Storm Worm variant attacks the machines of unsuspecting users when they open an e-mail attachment, click on a malicious e-mail link or visit a malicious site, said Dmitri Alperovitch, principal research scientist at Secure Computing.

But the twist comes when these people later post blogs or bulletin board notices. The software will insert into each of their postings a link to a malicious Web site, said Alperovitch, who rates the threat as “high.”

“We haven’t seen the Web channel used before,” he said. “In the past, we’ve seen malicious links distributed to people in a user’s address book and made to look like it’s an instant message coming from them.”

The danger in this most recent case, he added, is that the user is actually posting a legitimate blog or bulletin board notice, unaware that a malicious link has been slipped into the text of the posting.

Read the rest

This is just a FYI, I can’t come up with any way to comment on this stupid shit. I thought this was a dead issue, apparently not.

I don’t read enough to be a credible source on book suggestion. But I highly recommend you folks read this book by Thomas Sowell.
Frankly after reading it should be “required” reading for all Negros and liberals.
It puts articles like this in perspective.
But as I have said before if you white people want to write me a check out of guilt I’ll be happy to cash it, even ones from Bank of America! 

This past weekend Virginia became the first state in the country to pass a resolution apologizing for the state’s role in slavery. Now, a federal bill that would establish a commission to study reparations proposals for African Americans has a chance to finally pass in Congress. New York, Atlanta and other major U.S. city governments have passed resolutions supporting the bill and Congress should too. Earl Ofari Hutchinson
 

(link) LOS ANGELES — A reparations bill currently floating around Congress and being debated in the House Judiciary Committee may, for the first time since it was hatched two decades ago, actually have a chance at passing. The idea to establish a reparations commission is the brainchild of Michigan Democrat John Conyers. It has been kicked around Congress since 1989, but supporters are optimistic that it will pass since Democrats now have control of the House. Several cities, including Chicago and New York, have passed resolutions in support of the bill. Los Angeles city council vote on a resolution Tuesday.

On the surface, the bill is straightforward, and even innocuous. It calls for establishing a commission to study reparations proposals for African-Americans, not for doling out money. But as the past hyper-charged and contentious history of this debate has amply shown, when it comes to talking about reparations it’s anything but simple and straightforward. Yet there are ten reasons why Congress should back the commission.

1. The U.S. government, not long dead Southern planters, bears the blame for slavery. It encoded it in the Constitution in article one. This designated a black slave as three-fifths of a person for tax and political representation purposes. It protected and nourished it in article four by mandating that all escaped slaves found anywhere in the nation be returned to their masters. In the Dred Scott decision in 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that slaves remained slaves no matter where they were taken in the United States.

2. Major institutions profited from slavery. Several states and cities now require insurance companies to disclose whether they wrote policies insuring slaves. This is recognition that insurance companies made profits insuring slaves as property. The insurance industry was not the only culprit. Banks, shipping companies, and investment houses also made enormous profits from financing slave purchases, investments in southern land and products, and the transport and sale of slaves.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Published on Sunday, April 29, 2001 in the Chicago Tribune 

by Rob Sullivan - Link
 
The 4,000-square-foot house is a model of environmental rectitude.
Geothermal heat pumps located in a central closet circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground where the temperature is a constant 67 degrees; the water heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. Systems such as the one in this “eco-friendly” dwelling use about 25% of the electricity that traditional heating and cooling systems utilize.

A 25,000-gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof runs; wastewater from sinks, toilets and showers goes into underground purifying tanks and is also funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is used to irrigate the landscaping surrounding the four-bedroom home. Plants and flowers native to the high prairie area blend the structure into the surrounding ecosystem.

No, this is not the home of some eccentrically wealthy eco-freak trying to shame his fellow citizens into following the pristineness of his self-righteous example. And no, it is not the wilderness retreat of the Sierra Club or the Natural Resources Defense Council, a haven where tree-huggers plot political strategy.

This is President George W. Bush’s “Texas White House” outside the small town of Crawford.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

This is an informative and humorous post from The Anti-Idotarian Rottweiler.  If you are not familiar with this scam you need to look deeper into it.
But the bottom line is folks Gore is free to fuck up the environment as he sees fit.
However instead of reducing HIS energy consumption he “buys” these freaken carbon credits from others. It’s just over the top retarded and again incredible hypocritical.
If it were any other dude nobody would give a damm but now that he had received an academy award for his bullshit movie the gloves are coming off. But he need not worry there are millions more working class stiffs like Chris who will kiss Gore’s global warming ring no matter how much is he exposed as being a fraud.

***

While perusing an article about Hannity nailing the GoreBot for his rampant hypocrisy when he’s traveling all over the world spewing CO₂ like it’s going out of style while demanding that the rest of us quit breathing in order to save the polar bears, I once again came across something that makes me laugh like a deranged hyena every time I run into it.

You see, the GoreBot’s propaganda ministry promptly “rebutted” by claiming that the Inconvenient Moron “maintains carbon neutrality” for his jet-setting by buying “carbon offsets.”

So what are these “carbon offsets”, and why do they cause such enormous mirth in His Majesty’s daily life every time they’re mentioned?

Well, to answer the first question (and the last, really), they’re a scam that would have made Ponzi himself feel like a rank amateur. Not that the Enviroloons came up with the idea, they actually stole it from the Catholics of yore. Back then, they were called “indulgences” and, for a “modest” fee, you could buy instant forgiveness for any and all of your sins. Just confess (it’s good for the soul), let the kindly father ring up your tab, pay the fee and you were as pure as the driven snow again.

Let’s explain how the modern Indulgence Scam works: Let’s say that you own a business. Somewhere, somebody will be happy, for a “modest” fee of course, to calculate your business’s “carbon footprint”, which is a number describing how much you’re despoiling the virgin body of Mother Gaia with your wicked, capitalist ways. Now let’s say that you’re exceeding your “quota” by, say, 20 Kt of CO₂/year. That’s bad. You evil, WICKED Zoot!

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

The latest summary of yet another revised edition of a report by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control has evoked all the usual fears predicting the deaths of millions by 2080, and other end of the world scenarios.2080 is a mere 73 years from now. In meteorological terms, it is a blink of the eye. Real climatologists measure time far differently than the rest of us. While the IPCC, Al Gore, and the other fear mongers are warning of the horrors of Global Warming, it is useful to look at the time scales. The end of the last Ice Age was 11,500 ago.

It is also useful to keep in mind that the known cycle of time between Ice Ages is about 11,500 years. If you believe the fear mongers, in less than the lifetime of the average American, coastal cities will be under water. If the Ice Age cycle holds true, however, at some point it is far more likely that they will be under a thick sheet of ice.  Read More

This is from the Lawrence Journal World , this is just over the top retarded. You have to wonder if those who believe they have the right to determine what everyone else reads have even cracked the cover of these books before they determine them unsuitable. A silly question I know.

When I was in 7th grade I was given a book as a birthday gift called “Bad Nigger” the story of Jack Johnson, I was fascinated with the things he did and what he was able to accomplish in an era where most black men if they were kicking the shit out of white dudes and dating white women would be strung up.
Of course this is a tale that no respectable white family would let their kids read therefore it should be banned.
Yes Snoop is right winger and conservative but I freely admit that there are just way too many wacko types on my side, particularly here in Kansas, hey what ya gonna do?

***

Topeka — A Lawrence English teacher said Monday that proposed legislation to reduce protections for teachers from obscenity laws could result in students missing out on important literature.

“We do our kids a disservice when we start censoring” books that have been read for years, said Lori Stussie, who teaches a class called Diverse Voices at Lawrence High School.

The House Federal and State Affairs Committee has recommended approval of House Bill 2200, which would limit a legal protection for elementary and secondary teachers from laws governing obscene materials. College and university instructors and professors would retain the protection.

Kansas House obscenity bill

• House Bill No. 2200 (.pdf)
• Supplemental Note on House Bill No. 2200 (.pdf)

Supporters of the bill said there is potential harm to minors in being exposed to obscenity or pornography in novels, plays, books and films.

“The practical effect of this defense is that materials that would be illegal if sold at a porn shop may be legal if displayed to a kindergarten class,” said Rep. Lance Kinzer, R-Olathe, who sought the legislation.

But State Board of Education Chairman Bill Wagnon, D-Topeka, whose district includes Lawrence, opposed the bill, saying local school districts — not the Legislature — should handle any conflict about literature.

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

This is for Chris:  

Al Gore’s posh home in the Nashville suburbs might be “carbon neutral,” but it still uses a lot of power.

So much that last August Tipper and Al Gore used twice as much electricity in their two-building property as an average U.S. household uses in an entire year, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, a think tank, reported Tuesday.

Public power and gas bills turned up by the group show that the man behind the Oscar-winning global warming wakeup documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” uses much more overall carbon-based fuel than the average American, spending thousands of dollars a month on electricity and gas.

 I don’t really give a crap about this but since this is my blog and I get to post meaningless crap if I wanna!

I’m not a playa hata, if some dude has a big crib he is entitled to run up his utility bills as he sees fit.
However Al Gore is a fat ass hypocrite as are most liberals.
People who drive hybrid cars because they believe they are saving the planet and folks who buy weird light bulbs because they have been told that they save greenhouse gases.
I’m gonna keep saying it as long as I have this little sounding board.
Global warming is a fucken fraud. You only have to look at the biggest proponents of it (Al Gore) to get a sense of how ridiculous the notion is.
All of those Hollywood jackasses who flew their tired boring asses to Hollywood in private jets and limousines don’t give a shit about GW, but they sure as hell want you to do your part.

So to you folks driving around in that 1988 Honda with the muffler falling off, or you idiots still using incandescent light bulbs, or you people leaving your lights on when you leave a room shame on you. Look out your collective windows and see the mess you are making and the destruction you are causing.
Now imagine Al Gore looking out of the window of his beautiful estate and imagine how sad he must feel because YOU are fucking up the environment.  

POWER: GORE MANSION USES 20X AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD; CONSUMPTION INCREASE AFTER ‘TRUTH’

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

One of the early — and quite amazing — sidelights of the race for the Republican nomination for President in ’08 is how so many prominent conservatives are lining up behind Rudy Giuliani, who has perhaps the slimmest conservative credentials of any of the major GOP hopefuls.

The Republican Party has had a strong pro-life plank in its national platform since 1980, but the former New York mayor still characterizes himself as “pro-choice” and has never reversed his oft-stated 1990s opposition to a ban on partial-birth abortion.  When I questioned him during the recent California Republican convention about his support of gun control while mayor and his Bush-like support of a guest-worker program for illegal immigrants, Giuliani again declined to change his past, non-conservative stances.  He did, though, refuse to use the term “guest-worker program,” instead describing his position as favoring “immigration, assimilation and Americanization.”

While never actually endorsing gay marriage, Republican Giuliani broke with the President and most GOP members of Congress by opposing a constitutional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.  During his stint as mayor from 1993-2001, Giuliani actively courted the gay community by appointing gays to various city offices and marching in gay-pride parades. “How could we not be for Rudy?” is how James Vaughn, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, responded when I asked him who his group would support in ’08.

Many New York Republicans still bitterly recall how Giuliani, while New York’s first elected Republican mayor in nearly 30 years, endorsed Democratic Gov. Mario Cuomo in Cuomo’s losing bid for re-election in 1994.

Read the rest at Human Events

Found via Tom DeLays blog . No true conservative would ever cave in to a moronic California audience.
It’s obvious that dude is desperate.  

*** 

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was on the stump in California yesterday with Governor Schwarzenegger and had a mouthful to say on the subject of global warming. PressTelegram.com reports that,

“It’s now widely acknowledged to be a great threat to our planet, our children and our grandchildren,” McCain said. “Time is not on our side, we must act.”

He also used the opportunity to blast the Bush administration as unresponsive to global warming.

“This administration’s record on global warming is terrible,” McCain said. “I’ve held hearings for years and got no cooperation from the administration on this issue.”

We’ve gone on record a number of times arguing the highly questionable science behind global warming. What is of more interest to us in this specific case is the hypocrisy of Senator McCain, who is apparently trying to align himself with the radicalized green element of the left – which is in direct contrast to his past stances.

McCain has long been on the record as an opponent of ethanol subsidies, but has recently changed his tune with the looming Iowa Caucus. It might also be noted that his recent ‘conversion’ to ethanol actually aligns him with the administration (if you remember the President’s ethanol discussion during the State of the Union Address) although he probably would not be the first person to point that out.

Furthermore, McCain has voted YES on ANWR drilling which is a cardinal sin amongst the enviro-nuts he seems to be courting. Maybe he’s hoping some cheap digs at the administration can revamp his credibility with the old media types that used to love him and now dismiss him as yesterday’s news.

Ultimately, McCain has built a reputation around his criticisms of Republicans and Republican policies, and this time he’s using the global warming straw man to score points amongst blue state California greenies. His most recent outburst will only leave conservatives seeing red.

yup!

Found via the blog L’Enfant Terrible. Looks like another skank hoe from American Idol has been exposed because she has some “revealing” pic of herself available for viewing on the web.
Wow what a shock, yes this is obviously “American” Idol.
Parade a bunch of non singing skanks and goofy looking idiots and give them a shot at stardom.
In between show segments of them with their ailing grandmother and how they are single moms (a least all of the negro contestants) hoping to become a star so they can raise their little boy, boo fucken hoo!Yes I hate this show with a passion, and I am growing tired of so called reality TV.
American Idol is a breeding ground for no talent types to help nurture a new group of Brittany Spears wannabees. Oh and before you spit out Jenifer Hutson, that was a blip on the radar screen. She likely will be singing in a dark Vegas nightclub in 10 years.

As soon as one of the young skanks are invited to Hollywood the first thing they do is buy a digital camera, take a few tit shots and presto their porno career is launched.
Who cares that Simon trashes their singing prowess, a hot body will always trump a good singling voice.

***
Now Antonella Davis is in the hot seat. The pictures that have come out include revealing photos taken at the national World War II memorial and pictures of her performing fellatio. (Note: Most of the reports I’m seeing are now saying that the oral sex photos are with someone who looks very similar but not actually her.)

Will American Idol ban her from the competition for these photos? Will the fact that they were personal photos (as opposed to a porn site like Frenchie’s) make a difference? Will she pull a very public mea culpa and be redeemed like Tara Connor? Or will it be the end like it was for Miss Nevada?

Antonella should be off American Idol–but not for any of this. Her singing in the last round was awful, especially compared to some of the other women who really set a high standard. The reality, however, is that she will likely pay a price for this. If not imposed by Idol then by some of the fans. We are titillated but cannot admit it. As a country we quite enjoy attempting to monitor and control female sexuality in a rather public manner. Americans are likely to make her pay a price in public, even as we run to look at the photos in private.

Yes Snoop did look, shame on me, but it technically was for blog research, oink, oink, LOL!  

(See the photos here)

This from Little Green Footballs 

A Nutroots blogger whines about the right-wing noise machine (yes, again) in Salon.com, and advocates that “bomb-throwers” like Pandagon stay apart from campaigns, so that Democrat candidates can benefit from the Nutroots’ deranged personal attacks and smear jobs without getting any Nutroots goo on them: Why I refused to blog for Edwards.

And without paying anything either! It’s a win-win situation.

In general, because of the candidate’s popularity, and because of the relationships it had cultivated, the Webb campaign was able to benefit from much rowdier surrogates than Amanda Marcotte without paying for them. In addition to the “macaca” storm, pro-Webb blogger Mike Stark actually got arrested while covering an Allen campaign rally. The incident made national headlines. The video of Stark being carted away in handcuffs reinforced Allen’s image as a bully in the last days of the campaign. It’s unclear whether Stark’s self-assigned political theater ultimately helped the Webb campaign at the polls, but it didn’t hurt.

The Edwards campaign wants decentralized people-powered politics. Ironically, by hiring well-known bloggers to manage a destination Web site, it was actually centralizing and micromanaging. Every campaign needs a blog, but the most important part of a candidate’s netroots operation is the disciplined political operatives who can quietly build relationships with bloggers outside the campaign. And the bomb-throwing surrogates need to be outside, where they can make full use of their gifts without saddling a campaign with their personal political baggage.

 I found this on Ankle Biting Pundits. This post really interests me because illegal immigration is likely my number ONE issue in determining who I vote for in “08”.
I too lean heavily towards Rudy, but it is obvious I need to pay closer attention to his immigration stance and listen to him more closely.

I’m already pealing away my (no so firm support) of dude.
As a hard core conservative I along with many other conservatives are going to be out of luck in choosing a candidate that carries the banner for true conservative issues.

Romney is a fraud, Rudy is too liberal, McCain is old and tired and I don’t trust his immigration stances and the fact that while typing this I am drawing a blank on other Republican candidates despite knowing there are several more shows how this country is going to get fucked in 08.   

***

I was perusing NRO’s invaluable blog “The Corner” when I came across this post by John Derbyshire in which an emailer claimed that Rudy’s record on immigration was very McCain-like (i.e. Amnesty). The “Derb” is a big Rudy fan, but is also very much a hard-liner on the issue of illegal immigration and his views on the subject are very much in line with Tom Tancredo’s.  Here was Derb’s response.

 As I said a couple weeks ago:  “My heart says Tom [Tancredo] but my head says Rudy.”

We’re not going to get President Tom, or anyone like him.  There is no-one in the field, or likely to be in it, who is (a) fully aware of, and outspoken about, the immigration issue, and (b) at all likely to win.

So what do we do?  How about:  Support a tough-minded patriot who

(a) shows no signs of a deep ideological commitment to unrestricted immigration,

(b) is not in political hock to any of the invite-the-world business, race, guilt (Guilt?  Rudy?  Ha!), or Mexican-influence lobbies (although his consulting firm has, or had, Mexico City as a client),

(c) has never, in his extensive chief-executive experience, had to put immigration issues at the front of his mind, and so has a “position” on immigration like I have a position on the blocking rule in ice hockey,

(d) has a personality and intellect not the least, NOT THE LEAST, inclined towards the sappy-sentimentalist kumbaya view of humanity at large, or of immigrant humanity in particular (here, at least, his family background will have been informative),

(e) is going to have to go through some learning/repositioning exercises on several topics if he’s going to get conservative Republican voters out in sufficient numbers,(f) understands very, very well the cluelessness and incompetency of unionized civil-service bureaucracies (you don’t survive 8 years as mayor of New York without learning that!) and so will be properly contemptuous of any scheme or legislation that calls for a tripling of the workload of the federal immigration bureaucracy—the most clueless and incompetent of them all,(g) can make things happen,

(h) is Rudy Giuliani.

‘Nuff said? 

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

This from the Washington Times - Link 

The women of Tecalpulco, Mexico, want the U.S. government to enforce its immigration laws because they want to force their husbands to come back home from working illegally in the United States.
They have created an English-language Web page where they identify themselves as the “wetback wives” and broadcast their pleas, both to their men and to the U.S. government.
“To the United States government — close the border, send our men home to us, even if you must deport them (only treat them in a humane manner — please do not hurt them),” it reads.
In poignant public messages to their husbands, the women talk about their children who feel abandoned, and worry that the men have forsaken their families for other women and for the American lifestyle.
“You said you were only going to Arizona to get money for our house, but now you have been away and did not come back when your sister got married,” one woman writes to a man named Pedro. “Oh how I worry that you have another woman! Don’t you love me? You told me you love me.”

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

(MRC - link) In introducing and promoting a Sunday night 60 Minutes story, CBS reporters trumpeted “dissension in the ranks” showing “new opposition” to the Iraq war from “a large group of soldiers.” But it is neither new or large. Steve Kroft set up the Sunday piece by touting how “tonight you’ll hear dissension in the ranks from a large group of soldiers and Marines who are fed up and have decided to go public.” He explained that “they’re not going AWOL, they’re not disobeying orders or even refusing to fight in Iraq,” they’re bypassing the chain of command to denounce a war they’re in the middle of fighting.” On Friday’s CBS Evening News, fill-in anchor Russ Mitchell had previewed the story by asserting how “there is new opposition to the war tonight, and it comes from the very Americans fighting it — men and women in uniform.” Mitchell explained: “Hundreds of them are very publicly asking Congress to stop it. Lara Logan has this exclusive 60 Minutes report.”

The “new opposition” from a “large group,” however, is hardly “new” by daily broadcast journalism standards or “large” when compared to the number who have served in Iraq.

On Friday, Logan previewed her 60 Minutes story about a relatively minuscule number of servicemen who have signed a petition from an organization called “Appeal for Redress,” a group formed last year and which delivered some petitions to Congress way back on January 16. Logan announced how “over a thousand servicemen and women have done something normally unthinkable for the military: protest the war they’re in the middle of fighting….They’ve all sent a petition called ‘Appeal for Redress’ to their individual members of Congress letting them know that ’staying in Iraq will not work,’ and it’s ‘time for U.S. troops to come home.’” Logan’s piece featured soundbites from three soldiers, but none were identified by her or on screen. The CBSNews.com page previewing the story, however, includes names as did the subsequent Sunday night piece on 60 Minutes.

In a February 7 speech on the Senate floor Hillary Clinton said that her plan to cut funding for Iraqi troops is needed to “send a message” to the Iraqi government “that there are consequences to their inaction.” Those consequences would be a disaster for the Iraqi forces and the nascent Iraqi democracy according to the chief spokesman for the Multi-National Forces in Iraq says otherwise.

HUMAN EVENTS asked Maj. Gen. William Caldwell what would happen if Congress cut funding for Iraqi forces last week. Caldwell did not comment on Clinton’s plan directly, but he said that cutting funding to Iraqi forces “would have a devastating effect.”

“A lot of equipment that these street forces need is being purchased through our military,” he said. “If there was ever a time to follow through it’s right now as they [Iraqis] are stepping up to take the lead and take charge.

But, cutting funding for our Iraqi allies is exactly what Clinton would like to do.

Read more at Human Events

By Austin Fenner
 
The Rev. Al Sharpton, a descendant of slaves, stands in front of papers documenting his ancestors were owned by the family of Sen. Strom Thurmond. 
 
In a revelation that will stun the nation, the Rev. Al Sharpton, one of America’s most powerful black leaders, has unearthed a shattering family secret - his ancestors were slaves owned by relatives of the late South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond.
It is an ironic twist of fate that inexorably links one of the most vocal civil rights activists and an icon of Deep South segregation.

A team of some of the country’s most trusted genealogists spent two weeks examining Sharpton’s family background.

Sharpton learned the results of their work this week. Today, in the first part of a Daily News series, Sharpton talks about the emotional shock of learning how his family was so closely linked to a man who embodied everything he despises.

The Rev. Al Sharpton sat silently in the sanctity of his Manhattan radio studio as his family’s roots were laid bare before him.

With each revelation, the feeling of disbelief grew. His lips drew thin and his face tightened as the findings, projected onto a beige wall, brought home the enormity of the moment.

Sharpton - one of America’s most vocal and prominent civil rights campaigners, a man who has dedicated most of his grown life to furthering the cause of the black community - was stunned to learn how his history was bizarrely intertwined with a man with whom on the surface he had nothing in common - the late right-wing Sen. Strom Thurmond.

Read it all here

By Thomas Sowell

One of the many failings of our educational system is that it sends out into the world people who cannot tell rhetoric from reality. They have learned no systematic way to analyze ideas, derive their implications and test those implications against hard facts.
“Peace” movements are among those who take advantage of this widespread inability to see beyond rhetoric to realities. Few people even seem interested in the actual track record of so-called “peace” movements — that is, whether such movements actually produce peace or war.
Take the Middle East. People are calling for a cease-fire in the interests of peace. But there have been more cease-fires in the Middle East than anywhere else. If cease-fires actually promoted peace, the Middle East would be the most peaceful region on the face of the earth instead of the most violent.
Was World War II ended by cease-fires or by annihilating much of Germany and Japan? Make no mistake about it, innocent civilians died in the process. Indeed, American prisoners of war died when we bombed Germany.
There is a reason why General Sherman said “war is hell” more than a century ago. But he helped end the Civil War with his devastating march through Georgia — not by cease fires or bowing to “world opinion” and there were no corrupt busybodies like the United Nations to demand replacing military force with diplomacy.

(more…)

From John Hawkins: Right Wing News

After reading my column at Townhall, Lee Tabin sent me an email that included this line:

Can you imagine how the media would treat an inexperienced albeit appealing senator like Obama if he were a Republican?

Well, Lee, we already have an answer to that. The Republican in question was Dan Quayle. The media called Quayle stupid and said, over and over and over again, that he was too green and inexperienced to be Vice-President.

So, how much experience did Quayle have? He spent four years in the House and eight years in the Senate, which meant that he had almost as much experience in Congress (12 years) as Barack Obama, John Edwards, and Hillary Clinton combined (14 years).

Barack Obama is a lightweight who is only in the Senate because the Republican opponent who would have crushed him, Jack Ryan, imploded after a sex scandal and Barack only had to beat Alan Keyes to get elected. If Obama actually managed to take the Democratic nomination, he would lose in a Dukakisesque landslide when he would be forced to take positions on issues other than “working together” and “hope.”

This is a transcript from Rush today (Friday) I listen to the discussion about these stupid ass light bulbs the environmentalist punks want to shove up our collective asses.

The text speaks for itself. I’m just bleary folks seeing and reading all of this ridiculous wacked out shit I see from these liberal nuts.
I had no idea that Australia mandates this damm bulb.

I’m a pretty reasonable person I can understand the concern that some people have for the environment and “mother earth” but the more I read from environmental religious zealots, (make no mistake environmentalism is a religion) the more I tune you moronic bastards out. You people are sick and stupid.
If there is anybody that believes that replacing fucken light bulbs saves the planet, frankly you need either serious psychiatric help or a nice tall glass of Crown Royal on the rocks!  

 (full transcript) Also, yesterday we talked about this lightbulb BS, the compact fluorescent bulb. I finally saw a picture of one. I didn’t even know what one looked like. Somebody sent me a picture of a compact fluorescent. Do you know there’s a movement — you probably do. People follow this sort of stuff. I have more important things to do. It’s called the 18-second movement. The 18-second movement. That’s a campaign to make you idiots replace your incandescent bulbs which are destroying the planet with these new earth friendly CFC bulbs. The 18-second movement is so-called because 18-seconds is the average time it takes to change a lightbulb. The energy department, the EPA, Yahoo, Wal-Mart, are joining forces with all these wacko lightbulb activists, and there are lightbulb activists, make no mistake about it, to try to shame you into changing your bulbs. Now, one of these days you people are going to have enough these busybodies butting into your lives. It’s finally going to become oppressive and you’re going to tell them to butt out. I learned something — 18 seconds to change a lightbulb. I had no clue that it took 18 seconds to change a lightbulb. I always thought that’s what staff were for.

Rush, I just want to let you know I’m a liberal myself, okay, and I’m getting tired of the ridiculousness or if you want to say a party or ideology, you know, kind of stoops to, you know? I hear these people talk about the environment all the time. You know, you’ve got these movie stars talking this and that. For instance, this one movie star, her name is Cameron Diaz. They asked her, “What are you doing for the environment?” She was at one of these environmental conference things. She goes, “Well, I’m going carbon neutral.” I guess that’s the hot term now. I’m carbon neutral this. I do this. I do that. You know, she doesn’t know what carbon neutral means. This is just a hot term. You know those lightbulbs you were talking about earlier, Rush?

RUSH: Yeah. Yeah.

CALLER: Well, guess what? Those lightbulbs, the new ones that are coming out, they have mercury components in them, okay?

RUSH: Yes, we discussed this yesterday, shocking many people who didn’t know that there were mercury components.

CALLER: Exactly. And you’re supposed to dispose of those lightbulbs at a certain facility. The nearest facility for me is –

RUSH: Wait a minute. Wait a minute, whoa, whoa, whoa! I thought these carbon fluorescents were recyclable.

CALLER: You can’t throw ‘em out and a lot of people don’t know that. So what happens is they just throw them away.

RUSH: No! I thought you took ‘em back to the store, got them rejuiced, and put them back in the socket.

CALLER: No, no, no, you can’t take them back to the store. You can’t go to Home Depot or any other — you have to recycle them –

RUSH: You mean environmentalists are pitching a bunch of stuff that are not recyclable?

CALLER: No, they are but you have to take them to a certain place. The nearest place for me is 55 miles. Am I going to drive 55 miles for three little lightbulbs, and then they’re going to charge me?

(more…)

Sphere: Related Content

 The very idea of this is just over the top nutz! Just posting FYI folks. Cringe at your leisure.

There is an idea out there. Perhaps not a fully formed one. Perhaps more like the whisper of one gusting like a sudden draft through the rafters of the conservative house, causing some to look toward the attic and ask fearfully, “What was that?”

This wisp of a notion is simply this: Maybe a Democrat should win in 2008.

Personally, I don’t believe in this poltergeist, at least not yet. But every now and then, I must confess, I do shiver from its touch.

The idea goes something like this: If you believe that the war on terror is real — really real — then you think it is inevitable that more and bloodier conflicts with radical Islam are on the way, regardless of who is in the White House. If the clash of civilizations is afoot, then the issues separating Democrats and Republicans are as pressing as whether the captain of the Titanic is going to have fish or chicken for dinner. There’s a showdown coming. Period. Full stop. My task isn’t to convince you that this view is correct (though I basically believe it is), but merely that it is honestly and firmly held by many on the right and by a comparative handful on the left.

And that’s the problem: Only a handful of people on the left — and far too few liberals — see radical Islamists as a bigger threat than George W. Bush. Which is why if you really think that we are in an existential conflict with a deadly enemy, there’s a good case for the Democrats to take the reins. Not because Democrats are better, wiser or more responsible about foreign policy. That’s a case for Democrats to make about themselves and certainly not one many on the right believe. No, the argument, felt in places we don’t talk about at cocktail parties, is that the Democrats have been such irresponsible backseat drivers that they have to be forced to take the wheel to grasp how treacherous the road ahead is.

Read more