Senator Clinton says her “husband” (doesn’t call him that much, anymore) — The Bill — with the same information Bush had about bin Laden, would have taken terrorism more seriously than the current president or his national security team.
But five years after 9/11, what evidence is there that Mrs. Clinton’s Democrats take the fact that terrorists already struck us seriously? Every tool we use to fight terrorism, Democrats oppose it:
• Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid boasted, prematurely, that Democrats “killed the Patriot Act” — which thwarts terrorist cells inside America.
• Our covert program to wiretap calls to and from overseas terrorists was leaked to liberal newspapers, then opposed by Democrats. Same with our covert program to track and disrupt the flow of terrorist finances.
• We catch terrorists, we lean on them for information about future plots — and Democrats falsely accused the military of torture. They demand terrorists be accorded rights under treaties they never signed or honored.
• Democrats even demand we stop “offending” terrorists by calling them what they are: Islamofascists.
• Though bin Laden himself declared Iraq the central front in the war, Democrats demand we withdraw our forces from the very battlefields where we kill these people!
• Though we have succeeded in degrading Al-Qaeda’s leadership, Mrs. Clinton’s Democrats demand our Secretary of Defense quit.
Terrorists struck American interests multiple times on the Democrat Party’s watch, folks. If they responded as obsessively as they now claim, history would be their best witness — as it will be for the current president and his national security team. Take that, Mrs. Clinton — and your “husband.”
http://www.myspace.com/maharushy
http://groups.myspace.com/maharushygroup
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com
Sphere: Related Content
![[Valid RSS]](http://politicalpartypoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")