The Fascist Disease
Sphere: Related Content”Islamic fascism” is an accurate–and important–term.
by Joseph Loconte
PRESIDENT BUSH used the fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks to remind Americans of the nature of the fight against radical Islam. “It’s been called a clash of civilizations,” Bush said. “It is a struggle for civilization.” The president warned that a terrorist victory over the United States would bring a “desert of despotism” and “a totalitarian ideology that hates freedom.” Yet he stopped short of repeating the phrase he used last month–”Islamic fascists”–to describe terrorist groups such as al Qaeda. The administration ought to reprise the phrase as a legitimate and important tool in the war of ideas.
Many liberals think this rhetoric too simplistic, that it is a moralistic ploy to justify military adventurism. Others, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim Council of Britain, fear it will spark hate crimes and divide communities. “In the Muslim world you’re going to have a difficult time having the mainstream community marginalize extremists when they feel that their faith and their culture is under attack,” complained Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR. “And phrases like ‘Islamic fascist’ make people feel like the entire faith of Islam is under attack.”
This is the language of denial, a refusal to admit spiritual corruption from within. Nevertheless, advocates of a fascist link to extremist Islam should recall that it was the West that conceived this corruption in the last century. We cannot neglect the fact that “Christian Europe” enabled the growth of fascism in the 1920s and 30s–in states such as Austria, Belgium,
Croatia, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Indeed, the fascist virus even managed to invade the bloodstream of the Christian church.
![[Valid RSS]](http://politicalpartypoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")