<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Limbaugh Laws</title>
	<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: thewaronterrible</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-312</link>
		<author>thewaronterrible</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 18:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-312</guid>
					<description>Limbaugh is just a bad comedian.
I treat these ideas the same as I would had they come from
Adam Sandler or David Spade on how to deal with the
immigration problem. But at least those guys might be funny
when they offer ideas.
But, unlike conservatives, I am one to go beyond name-calling
so I will point out a least one fatal flaw in
Limbaugh's reasoning: Should such a policy be imposed
upon "illegal immigrants" who were born in the U.S.
and who have no say in how they got here?
Moreover here is what right-wingers forget.
IT IS REPUBLICAN CORPORATE
INTERESTS that desired cheap
labor available from immigrants, who, corporations know
won't join unions or otherwise seek better wages and
more hospitable working conditions, DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE
FOR INCREASING THE PROLIFERATION OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
IN THE U.S.
It is Bushie Republicans wanting to continue this source of cheap
cheap labor who are
working against tougher immigration policies.
I have read sniffer's thoughts on immigration on this blog
to know
he is applying the conservative spin on how "liberals"
approach this issue, rather than anything approaching
a true informed Liberal approach to immigration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limbaugh is just a bad comedian.<br />
I treat these ideas the same as I would had they come from<br />
Adam Sandler or David Spade on how to deal with the<br />
immigration problem. But at least those guys might be funny<br />
when they offer ideas.<br />
But, unlike conservatives, I am one to go beyond name-calling<br />
so I will point out a least one fatal flaw in<br />
Limbaugh&#8217;s reasoning: Should such a policy be imposed<br />
upon &#8220;illegal immigrants&#8221; who were born in the U.S.<br />
and who have no say in how they got here?<br />
Moreover here is what right-wingers forget.<br />
IT IS REPUBLICAN CORPORATE<br />
INTERESTS that desired cheap<br />
labor available from immigrants, who, corporations know<br />
won&#8217;t join unions or otherwise seek better wages and<br />
more hospitable working conditions, DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE<br />
FOR INCREASING THE PROLIFERATION OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION<br />
IN THE U.S.<br />
It is Bushie Republicans wanting to continue this source of cheap<br />
cheap labor who are<br />
working against tougher immigration policies.<br />
I have read sniffer&#8217;s thoughts on immigration on this blog<br />
to know<br />
he is applying the conservative spin on how &#8220;liberals&#8221;<br />
approach this issue, rather than anything approaching<br />
a true informed Liberal approach to immigration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sniffer</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-313</link>
		<author>Sniffer</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-313</guid>
					<description>The liberal approach to immigration is to let them all in illegal or otherwise because liberal Democrats see them as a voting constituency. That is not my spin. Dude c’mon
You have been reading this blog long enough to know I don’t need to SPIN anything.

This is also why Democrats oppose any type of voter registration, voter identification, voting rights for felons and so on.

As far as Republicans corporate interests desiring cheap labor, sure there is something to that but this is why the federal government should fine their asses to the Stone Age if they are caught hiring illegal immigrants.
I also will be very much against and all conservatives should rally against any republican candidate who (speaks like Bush) on immigration. If they are not going to attack this issue aggressively then they don’t deserve the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal approach to immigration is to let them all in illegal or otherwise because liberal Democrats see them as a voting constituency. That is not my spin. Dude c’mon<br />
You have been reading this blog long enough to know I don’t need to SPIN anything.</p>
<p>This is also why Democrats oppose any type of voter registration, voter identification, voting rights for felons and so on.</p>
<p>As far as Republicans corporate interests desiring cheap labor, sure there is something to that but this is why the federal government should fine their asses to the Stone Age if they are caught hiring illegal immigrants.<br />
I also will be very much against and all conservatives should rally against any republican candidate who (speaks like Bush) on immigration. If they are not going to attack this issue aggressively then they don’t deserve the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinity</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-315</link>
		<author>trinity</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 23:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-315</guid>
					<description>(the war on terrible said...)
"Limbaugh is just a bad comedian.
I treat these ideas the same as I would had they come from
Adam Sandler or David Spade on how to deal with the
immigration problem. But at least those guys might be funny
when they offer ideas."

WHOOOOOOOOOSH!  That was the sound of the irony rushing over twot's head as he missed the point that Rush was making with "The Limbaugh Laws" of immigration.  lol  You may not like Rush as a comedian, twot, but he can be an excellent satirist when he wants to be.  In any case, his brilliance is obviously lost on you.

(the war on terrible said...)
"It is Bushie Republicans wanting to continue this source of cheap cheap labor who are working against tougher immigration policies."

Before I even address this comment, twot, I would ask you to please do your best to explain to us why all of your Democrat Party leaders are praising the way President Bush is handling this issue?  Or aren't you aware of your party's position on illegal aliens?  Tell us what "a true informed Liberal approach to immigration" means to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(the war on terrible said&#8230;)<br />
&#8220;Limbaugh is just a bad comedian.<br />
I treat these ideas the same as I would had they come from<br />
Adam Sandler or David Spade on how to deal with the<br />
immigration problem. But at least those guys might be funny<br />
when they offer ideas.&#8221;</p>
<p>WHOOOOOOOOOSH!  That was the sound of the irony rushing over twot&#8217;s head as he missed the point that Rush was making with &#8220;The Limbaugh Laws&#8221; of immigration.  lol  You may not like Rush as a comedian, twot, but he can be an excellent satirist when he wants to be.  In any case, his brilliance is obviously lost on you.</p>
<p>(the war on terrible said&#8230;)<br />
&#8220;It is Bushie Republicans wanting to continue this source of cheap cheap labor who are working against tougher immigration policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Before I even address this comment, twot, I would ask you to please do your best to explain to us why all of your Democrat Party leaders are praising the way President Bush is handling this issue?  Or aren&#8217;t you aware of your party&#8217;s position on illegal aliens?  Tell us what &#8220;a true informed Liberal approach to immigration&#8221; means to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinity</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-317</link>
		<author>trinity</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 02:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-317</guid>
					<description>(Sniffer said...)
"I also will be very much against and all conservatives should rally against any republican candidate who (speaks like Bush) on immigration."

I'm with you on that 100%, Sniffer.  Which is why McCain had better not be the GOP candidate.  I think I'd like to see Sen. George Allen of Alabama get the bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sniffer said&#8230;)<br />
&#8220;I also will be very much against and all conservatives should rally against any republican candidate who (speaks like Bush) on immigration.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on that 100%, Sniffer.  Which is why McCain had better not be the GOP candidate.  I think I&#8217;d like to see Sen. George Allen of Alabama get the bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvrrtist</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-389</link>
		<author>Silvrrtist</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 17:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/22/the-limbaugh-laws/#comment-389</guid>
					<description>I've seen this floating around the internet and after looking at Rush's site and the transcript from that piece, I noticed the last but most important bit was not 
included. Here's the bit that's left out: &lt;B&gt;"You think the Limbaugh Laws are harsh? Well, every one of the laws I just mentioned are actual laws of Mexico today! That’s how the Mexican government handles immigrants to their country. Yet Mexicans come here illegally and protest in our streets!How do you say 'double standard' in Spanish? 
How about: 'No mas!'" &lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this floating around the internet and after looking at Rush&#8217;s site and the transcript from that piece, I noticed the last but most important bit was not<br />
included. Here&#8217;s the bit that&#8217;s left out: <b>&#8220;You think the Limbaugh Laws are harsh? Well, every one of the laws I just mentioned are actual laws of Mexico today! That’s how the Mexican government handles immigrants to their country. Yet Mexicans come here illegally and protest in our streets!How do you say &#8216;double standard&#8217; in Spanish?<br />
How about: &#8216;No mas!&#8217;&#8221; </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
