<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 200,000,000!</title>
	<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/11/200000000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: El Borak</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/11/200000000/#comment-188</link>
		<author>El Borak</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 20:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/11/200000000/#comment-188</guid>
					<description>Here's a wonderful example of crazy liberal bad math:
http://www.mobilization2-21.com/missing.htm

============================================

Look on your bookshelf and pull out a copy of the World Almanac. Turn to the section where they have world population data...:

	Africa	Europe
		
1650	100	100
1750	95	140
1850	95	265
1950	200	530

Interesting?? Just look at the numbers. During the 200-year period from 1650 to 1850, there was a 165 million increase in the European population. The population of Africa declined. 

You might say, quite correctly, that the Africans were being transported to the "New World." However, so were Europeans. Besides, the African population of all North and South America in 1850 was, maybe, 20-25 million maximum. Thus, we are missing a bunch of folks; by any measure (that is, unless you think white folks simply multiply faster than we do). 

===========================================

Here's a wonderful example of "What's missing?"  What was going on from 1650 to 1850 in Europe that was not going on in Africa?  How about only the single most significant social movement of the millennium?  Europe had an industrial revolution during that time which resulted in higher food production and doubled life expectancies across the continent and caused the population to grow.  Africa did not.  Simple freaking answer.

And yet the liberals miss it.

And then they wonder why only they take themselves seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a wonderful example of crazy liberal bad math:<br />
<a href="http://www.mobilization2-21.com/missing.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobilization2-21.com/missing.htm</a></p>
<p>============================================</p>
<p>Look on your bookshelf and pull out a copy of the World Almanac. Turn to the section where they have world population data&#8230;:</p>
<p>	Africa	Europe</p>
<p>1650	100	100<br />
1750	95	140<br />
1850	95	265<br />
1950	200	530</p>
<p>Interesting?? Just look at the numbers. During the 200-year period from 1650 to 1850, there was a 165 million increase in the European population. The population of Africa declined. </p>
<p>You might say, quite correctly, that the Africans were being transported to the &#8220;New World.&#8221; However, so were Europeans. Besides, the African population of all North and South America in 1850 was, maybe, 20-25 million maximum. Thus, we are missing a bunch of folks; by any measure (that is, unless you think white folks simply multiply faster than we do). </p>
<p>===========================================</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a wonderful example of &#8220;What&#8217;s missing?&#8221;  What was going on from 1650 to 1850 in Europe that was not going on in Africa?  How about only the single most significant social movement of the millennium?  Europe had an industrial revolution during that time which resulted in higher food production and doubled life expectancies across the continent and caused the population to grow.  Africa did not.  Simple freaking answer.</p>
<p>And yet the liberals miss it.</p>
<p>And then they wonder why only they take themselves seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinity</title>
		<link>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/11/200000000/#comment-189</link>
		<author>trinity</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/05/11/200000000/#comment-189</guid>
					<description>Ah yes!  I remember that original Major Owens shark story very well.  Rush takes it out and dusts it off from time to time.  lol  I have to say that there are times when it's truly embarrassing and more than a little disturbing to know we have individuals of such limited intellect representing our country.  

Unfortunately, since I live in PA, I have Arlen "Magic Bullet" "Scottish Law" Specter to contend with.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes!  I remember that original Major Owens shark story very well.  Rush takes it out and dusts it off from time to time.  lol  I have to say that there are times when it&#8217;s truly embarrassing and more than a little disturbing to know we have individuals of such limited intellect representing our country.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, since I live in PA, I have Arlen &#8220;Magic Bullet&#8221; &#8220;Scottish Law&#8221; Specter to contend with.  :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
