200,000,000!
Old recycled post. But it frames liberals very well I think While driving home the other afternoon, I laughed so hard I almost got into a wreck. I literally had to pull my car over. Rush repeated (my first time hearing) a clip from Rep. Major Owens (D-NY) that he first aired in 1996. He currently has an article on his website (for subscribers) but hell Sniff has the gist.
Anybody who is a long time listener to the Rush Limbaugh show or listened to the show back in the Clinton era may remember this information about Rep. Owens. Rush highlighted in his show an ABC World News Tonight report in June of 1996, by Carole “Jennings” Simpson reported that 100 million slaves were thrown overboard during the slave trade.This is what Rep. Major Owens (D-NY) claimed in a speech a year earlier on the house floor, in an except he said 200 million slaves were thrown overboard and that this genocide changed the ecology of the ocean so much that the sharks still swim the slave routes! I thought OH MY GOD! You know I hear and read a whole lot of stupid shit but to hear it come out of an elected officials mouth and the dumbass said it on the house floor was nothing less than stunning.This idea was first expressed by Owens during Special Orders a year earlier 1995.
So dude had been processing this info for quite some time.
Owens insisted that 200 million slaves on their way to America had been thrown overboard during the slave trade and that this had changed the ecology of the ocean to the point that sharks still swam the old trade routes in the hope of finding more bodies to feed upon.
Rush of course found this claim of 200 million a bit absurd. The population of North America at the time was far less than 100 million, and it is hard to imagine that 200 million slaves could have been transported across the Atlantic over 200 years.

Rush’s staff ran the numbers and found that to have 100 million drowned slaves, the slave traders would have had to put out nine ships a day with 152 slaves in each ship. This would have had to continue every day for 200 years, which works out to 1,370 slaves a day and 499,977 slaves per year thrown overboard, not counting leap years.
No matter how the numbers are worked, this figure of 100 million drowned slaves would still be impossible, especially since some of these slaves had to reach the New World alive. And Owens originally claimed that the number of drowned slaves was 200 million, which means all of these numbers would have had to have been doubled.
Rush exposed the absurdity of Owens’ claim on his radio and TV show at the time, and Owens then reworked the figures down to 100 million, claiming he had gotten some “bad data.” (no he pulled it out of his ass) However, even 100 million drowned slaves is hard to imagine, but that didn’t stop ABC from reporting this as fact.

Yes ABC was as stupid as Owens was. Where the hell was Peter Jennings then!?
The population of the world at this time, though, was only 400 million, which means that the slave trade would have killed nearly a quarter of the world’s population over these 200 years.
This simply is not possible, so Rush has to wonder if he could check these numbers so easily, why couldn’t ABC?
My point to all of this is people process information all the time and come up with all kinds of bullshit to make their position re sound. Few of us actually process and challenge what we read and what we hear.
This is why we are a country of tired bullshit cliches. Major Owens trying to prove a point to forward his agenda on the supposed behalf of his constituents ended up tarnishing his reputation and permanently making him into a laughing stock.
But what is worse is that this crazy bastard is still in office!
Can you begin to comprehend how either out of touch or flat ignorant the constituents in the 11th congressional district of New York must be to have kept this idiot in office for so many years?
I looked long and hard for credible information on just how many slaves were lost. After exhaustive Google University Research I determined that……..we have no fucken idea. And what the hell difference does it make today.
Regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum, whatever information you process be sure to study BOTH sides of an argument.
I state over and over that the reason why I STUDY liberals, not only what they say but how they say it is what consistently drives me to the conclusion that liberalism is not only wacked but sociologically corrosive. To make their points liberals will do what Major Owens did and do it with a straight face hoping nobody is paying attention.
Oh you better believe Sniff is paying attention.
The potential to be enslaved and to make our tentative way to freedom is perennially within us. It’s not simply that each generation is commanded to feel as if it was personally brought forth from Egypt, but that at every moment we are presented with the opportunity to liberate ourselves
Roberta Israeloff




![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://politicalpartypoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png)
May 11th, 2006 at 8:33 pm
Here’s a wonderful example of crazy liberal bad math:
http://www.mobilization2-21.com/missing.htm
============================================
Look on your bookshelf and pull out a copy of the World Almanac. Turn to the section where they have world population data…:
Africa Europe
1650 100 100
1750 95 140
1850 95 265
1950 200 530
Interesting?? Just look at the numbers. During the 200-year period from 1650 to 1850, there was a 165 million increase in the European population. The population of Africa declined.
You might say, quite correctly, that the Africans were being transported to the “New World.” However, so were Europeans. Besides, the African population of all North and South America in 1850 was, maybe, 20-25 million maximum. Thus, we are missing a bunch of folks; by any measure (that is, unless you think white folks simply multiply faster than we do).
===========================================
Here’s a wonderful example of “What’s missing?” What was going on from 1650 to 1850 in Europe that was not going on in Africa? How about only the single most significant social movement of the millennium? Europe had an industrial revolution during that time which resulted in higher food production and doubled life expectancies across the continent and caused the population to grow. Africa did not. Simple freaking answer.
And yet the liberals miss it.
And then they wonder why only they take themselves seriously.
May 11th, 2006 at 9:53 pm
Ah yes! I remember that original Major Owens shark story very well. Rush takes it out and dusts it off from time to time. lol I have to say that there are times when it’s truly embarrassing and more than a little disturbing to know we have individuals of such limited intellect representing our country.
Unfortunately, since I live in PA, I have Arlen “Magic Bullet” “Scottish Law” Specter to contend with. :(