Comments on: Democrats GOT PAID BIG TYME! WHO HOO!! http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/ They said it: "man this dude is Krazy!" “you sir are an idiot” “you are a lunatic” “are you really black?” “meanest, most divisive, most irrelevant blog I have ever read” Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:33:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: JABBS http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1352 JABBS Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:09:00 +0000 http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1352 The key line is "according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee." Since when is that a credible or unbiased source? And what is "Abramoff-linked cash" mean? Seems that's very careful wording -- technically correct but misleading -- in keeping with the general style of anything written by Ken Mehlman or his pals. Find a legitimate source that offers a legitimate list, and then you might have something. Democrats are willing to concede the failures of its leaders. We aren't blind followers like the conservative mythmakers proclaim. The key line is “according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee.”

Since when is that a credible or unbiased source?

And what is “Abramoff-linked cash” mean? Seems that’s very careful wording — technically correct but misleading — in keeping with the general style of anything written by Ken Mehlman or his pals.

Find a legitimate source that offers a legitimate list, and then you might have something. Democrats are willing to concede the failures of its leaders. We aren’t blind followers like the conservative mythmakers proclaim.

]]> By: JABBS http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1353 JABBS Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:10:00 +0000 http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1353 The key line is "according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee." Since when is that a credible or unbiased source? And what is "Abramoff-linked cash" mean? Seems that's very careful wording -- technically correct but misleading -- in keeping with the general style of anything written by Ken Mehlman or his pals. Find a legitimate source that offers a legitimate list, and then you might have something. Democrats are willing to concede the failures of its leaders. We aren't blind followers like the conservative mythmakers proclaim. The key line is “according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee.”

Since when is that a credible or unbiased source?

And what is “Abramoff-linked cash” mean? Seems that’s very careful wording — technically correct but misleading — in keeping with the general style of anything written by Ken Mehlman or his pals.

Find a legitimate source that offers a legitimate list, and then you might have something. Democrats are willing to concede the failures of its leaders. We aren’t blind followers like the conservative mythmakers proclaim.

]]> By: Snoop http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1354 Snoop Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:52:00 +0000 http://politicalpartypoop.com/2006/01/06/democrats-got-paid-big-tyme-who-hoo/#comment-1354 The key line is "according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee." Since when is that a credible or unbiased source? C'mon J can't you see when you are being set-up? http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/1/6/100900.shtml Now your liberal homies did the same thing http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010506Z.shtml LETS TRY THIS AGAIN: NOTE THE DATE J. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/02/AR2005060202158.html The key line is “according to a list compiled by the Republican National Committee.”
Since when is that a credible or unbiased source?

C’mon J can’t you see when you are being set-up?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/1/6/100900.shtml

Now your liberal homies did the same thing
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010506Z.shtml

LETS TRY THIS AGAIN: NOTE THE DATE J.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/02/AR2005060202158.html

]]>